Brad Angelina Berlin

nobody can just become an instant family of four… life just doesn’t work that way, unless you’re so simple minded that you just accept everything. my guess would be that brad and angmarriage-wrecker are complicated individuals and although they presumably experienced one year of bliss, they bring a lot of baggage to the relationship … who knows what feelings are felt, expressed ane exchanged behind closed doors, unless of course, they are not honest with their feelings.

jjoy, I´m adding that link to my favourites! Thank YOU!

THERE ARE SOME NEW BP PICS OUT. And this guys hair looks crazy. Im so hoping this is just the doings of his son. Because if it not he needs to put that rapped out hat back on.http://community.livejournal.com/brad_news/132571.html

JA is more complex as a person then her "American Sweetheart" persona. BP has said this in an interview. It’s pretty obvious AJ is complex. The difference is that AJ doesn’t try to present herself otherwise. It’s moronic to try and "guess" what have been discussed b/w AJ and BP. Its obvious Jolie-Pitt wants to be together. Will it last? Only the shadows knows.

i have seen the interview that JA did at the red carpet, i felt sorry fo the guy who was doing the inerview the look that she give him, that was not nice at all.Some women are alike vampires the suck the life out of their husbands. We as women must see what the sings of unhappy marriages does to their husbands.Love, respect, Marriages are 2 way street, you can’t have one of the couple happy and the other one miserable.

I’m not a Jennifer fan at all..I am very pro BAMZ, but I don’t think you can entirely blame JA for coming across as defensive.,…she has had an ultra difficult time with the media in her biz and making all kinds of claims…love BAMZ all the way!!

134,Would you please do tell, on what happened. What was he asking her? Why did she gave her the looks?

you all are way too fanatical about this.

Angie - home wrecker… honest? Point blank: "I would never sleep with a married man" yeah, that’s real honest. Who are we kidding?

we all need to have more sex, and less sleep because other peoples life wouldn’t look that good to us anymore.

Thanks for the pictures JARED - I LOVE THEM ALL. This is the only site I visit to get updates on BAMZ. I love your site especially because there are no BAMZ haters here. I’m happy for them & I love seeing how happy they are just being a family. Its nice to see that they are just being that now & living a down to earth type of lifestyle. I’m so tired of seeing the majority of celebrities who are shallow & constantly just care about their hair, nails, clothes etc. At least Brad & Angie are doing humanitarian work & its inspiring to see that not everything in HOLLYWOOD revolves around shopping or plastic surgery. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK JARED!! Can’t wait to see new pics & updates. I LOVE BAMZ!!! I WISH THEM THE BEST..

Mary, #133 @ 12:07pm— Awesome point! It never occurred to me that by seeing their movies we are donating to people who need help, because that is what they do. You are so right! Shout out to BAMZ: Phone Home! What’s going on?

Hi guys, I’ve attached the following article published in the Economist, one of the most respected journals. I was glad to read it. I never actually buy star or in touch etc though I might scan them for the pictures. Also, never read Post Chronicle or National Ledger. Having never been a real celebrity follower until BAMZ, I use to browse through some women magazines from time to time and read the gossip and actually believed them. Not in a "OMG, that’s fascinating" way but rather in a "huh, so that’s what’s happening". One thing my current obsession with BAMZ has taught me is that these tabloids are full of lies and they definitely don’t tell you about what is happening to the people they report on at all. I’m not spending my time or money on badly written lies. Trashy magazines junked!A limitless appetite for nothing may have been sated at lastTHEIR headlines are as captivating as ever: “Jessica & Jude Steamy Hotel Romp!” (the Star); “Hillary Attacks Bill’s Secret Lover” (Globe); “Farrah Fawcett: My Drug Hell!” (National Enquirer); and, most thrilling of all, “Giant polar monster attacks cruise ship!” and “10 New Commandments Found!” (Weekly World News).Viewed in a vacuum, American Media, the owner of these publications, has never been more on its game, producing all the flotsam one could ever wish to know, and that ever-important little bit more. Behind the gloss, as it might say, lurks a darker picture. If these publications had business pages, the headline might read “Investors Pelted by Crumbling Bonds!”. Paddy Hirsch of Standard & Poor’s points out that since early February the yield on the group’s debt has risen to a junkier-than-junk level of 14%, up from a pristine 4.3% a year ago.Collectively, American Media continues to sell millions of copies, but the numbers are contracting. The National Enquirer lost more than 20% of its circulation between 2003 and the middle of last year. Stricter industry standards for measuring circulation numbers are expected to push down reported sales further, for at least half of the group’s publications when the new numbers are released in June. On February 15th, American Media announced it would restate financial returns dating back to March of 2004.Meanwhile, sales of the Star, American Media’s flagship publication, have been, “soft” recently, the company acknowledged, though it claimed that they have rebounded. Advertising is lagging as well. Given the magnetic quality of American Media’s mastery of low culture, what could be going wrong?Based on The Economist’s investigative trip to a news-stand, a possible conclusion is that the industry now faces the consequences of its own genius. Half-a-dozen publications now use exclamation marks on their covers to describe the divorces, pregnancies, affairs, eating disorders and assorted depravities of the same small group of celebrities—notably Jessica Simpson, Britney Spears, “TomKat” (Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes), Jennifer Aniston and, most important, Angelina Jolie and her “bump”.The formula for filling out the rest of these publications has been standardised: spotting cellulite, tracking breast augmentation and all around liposuction; a smattering of scoops bought from gossipy make-up artists and bouncers, etc; and a bit of slavish grovelling in the “exclusive interview”. For a while, these magazines grew as a response to the fully airbrushed portraits in glossier establishments such as Vogue and Vanity Fair. But demand may at last be sated. On current trends, the number of magazines could soon exceed the number of celebrities they feature.Worse still, price competition has entered the business. In Touch and OK! have both been introduced recently with cover prices of $1.99, compared with the prevailing $3 and above. People want their cheap thrills, but more cheaply.