Brad Pitt Shopping
Paris, France :: I finally present to you Brad Pitt (wearing his tan shoes again!) shopping earlier this month at photography store La Maison du Leica located at 52 Boulevard Beaumarchais. ("La Maison du Leica" translates to "The House of Leica." Leica is a camera company, "the father of 35 mm photography" and a leading manufacturer of high precision cameras.) Brad, 42, didn’t left the camerashop emptyhanded before heading home to his family — Angelina Jolie, 30, son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, 4, and daughter Zahara Jolie-Pitt, 1. Days after, Brad was whisked away to the Dominican Republic to meet with art dealers, promoters and architects. More pictures in the gallery!








Older









461 Comments
I have a question. What’s up with Jared posting pics on Prison Break/Wentworth Miller every other day? Is he like a major fan of this show or what?
Doofus sperm donor and delusional amateur architect Brad Pitt to redesign New Orleans!
If Brad and Angie survive all these media nonsense, I think their story is going to be one of the greatest love stories ever told. I pray they do!
just when i thought the day was going well!
Passing ThroughI’ll also pass.StefJust ignore the raving moron. I believe she is close kin to the old woman I told you about yesterday.
african girl…yeah i was going to, im on a high today so no getting me out of that state of mind!
Nevermind that horrible NYDN article. Here’s a much more interesting piece on AJ THE ACTRESS. I’d never seen this story before.+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Copyright 2005 Salon.com, Inc. Salon.comLENGTH: 2499 wordsHEADLINE: Angelina Jolie’s Hollywood exileBYLINE: By Allen BarraOne of my fondest memories of Pauline Kael was a weekend at her home in Great Barrington, Mass., just a few months before she died. Newsday critic Gene Seymour and I spent two nights catching her up on a fantastic new actress, Angelina Jolie, whom she had seen once in a Mike Newell comedy, "Pushing Tin" (1999), and been delighted with. Pauline didn’t care much for "Girl, Interrupted," the film for which Jolie won the best supporting actress Oscar (neither did Seymour, who earned a hearty laugh by dubbing it "Snakepit 90210"), but she howled gleefully every time Jolie reduced one of the other actresses in the film to mere window dressing."Those poor actresses," she said. "She’s absolutely fearless in front of a camera. This girl would scare the crap out of Jack Nicholson in ‘Cuckoo’s Nest.’" Kael’s favorite performance was Jolie as the doomed bisexual supermodel Gia in the HBO film. "My God," she exclaimed, "this girl could play both the Brando and Maria Schneider roles in ‘Last Tango’! Where in the world did she come from?" From where indeed? One of her earlier directors called her "an extraordinary-looking creature, like some weird, undiscovered orchid." Never having attended college, Jolie is unencumbered by the jargon-riddled baggage that passes for modern education. The instinctual power of her work is refreshingly devoid of the anesthetizing layers that plague so much American acting. Her responses to everything are visceral and direct, a quality that has earned her a fandom that cuts across class, sex and even political lines. While other celebrities exhaust themselves trying to stay hip, Jolie, who offers no indication in her interviews that she has any knowledge or interest in popular culture, defines hip. Apparently oblivious to the mockery of a large portion of the mainstream press (such as the New York Times, which headlined a story "Can Angelina Jolie Save the World?") and even the cheap collegiate cynicism of "Saturday Night Live," Jolie, like the existential man whom French intellectuals used to worship, chooses her own loyalties and responsibilities without deference to conservative or liberal pieties.She is often referred to in magazines as Hollywood royalty, but Angelina the actress isn’t really her father’s girl or anyone else’s. Like Athena, she seems to have sprung fully formed from the head of Zeus — except that her estranged father, Jon Voight, isn’t her Zeus; she inherited his talent but not his instincts. (Combine Voight with Jolie’s beautiful mother, the French Canadian Iroquois actress Marcheline Bertrand, and her uncle, Chip Taylor, the rock singer who wrote "Wild Thing," and you might have something). Jolie is both her own Zeus and Athena, constantly re-creating herself. She may be the first great movie star ever to have no antecedents. Film critic Parker Tyler thought the pantheon of movie gods and goddesses in every era to be new versions of their predecessors; Marilyn Monroe was a reincarnation of Jean Harlow, Liz Taylor of Theda Bara, etc. But Jolie doesn’t evoke previous movie goddesses; there is a touch of her godmother, Jacqueline Bisset, who, like Angelina, was considered the most beautiful actress of her time but who was a dull screen presence compared to Jolie.There is, perhaps, a hint of the spirit of another Hollywood brat, the young Jane Fonda, in her, though it’s difficult to picture Jolie ever settling into such a doctrinaire sociopolitical stance as Fonda’s in the late ’60s. Jolie is so independent she doesn’t even qualify as a feminist, unless the definition can be extended to a woman who loved so fiercely that she carried a vial of her husband’s blood around her neck. As for politics, Jolie’s activism hasn’t lent itself to easy answers and finger pointing but to front-line involvement ("My first job today," she wrote in her journal about her U.N. missions, "Notes From My Travels," "was measuring the medicine powder at the therapeutic feeding center. Under the age of five — extra nutrition. Pregnant — measured. I wanted to be careful not to measure a spoonful too short.") Jolie’s real influences don’t appear to be other actresses, past or current, but, as Kael hinted, the great male screen rebels like Brando and Nicholson. Her performances in "Girl, Interrupted" and especially in "Gia" might be the most powerful American acting of the last 20 or so years. It’s impossible to imagine any other American actress in those roles; at her best, Jolie makes nearly every other actress of her generation look timid. (One felt afraid briefly for Gwyneth Paltrow — by no means a lightweight herself — when Jolie’s leather-clad, eye-patched fighter pilot in "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow" zeroed in on her. "What," she asks Jude Law, her voice dripping with contempt, "is that?")Angelina Jolie is the most popular movie star in the world in every conceivable way but one: She isn’t popular. At least not in terms of selling movie tickets. Tabloids, sure. Magazines, from Marie Claire to Vanity Fair to Reader’s Digest, yes. She’s the empress of Web sites (the best one I’ve found is Souliejolie.com, but you may have trouble getting on it, as I often have, because of the heavy traffic). But she’s not popular in movies. Jolie created the first truly kick-ass female action hero in films, Lara Croft — Croft’s closest living relative would be Diana Rigg’s Emma Peel on the old "Avengers" television series — yet she isn’t a substantial box office draw. The overstuffed "Mr. and Mrs. Smith," thanks in large part to all the silly postproduction gossip, may change her box office status, if temporarily, but to what avail if she has to appear in the same kind of movies to sustain it? (It does have one unforgettable sequence with Jolie, dressed in a black plastic ********** outfit, breaking a man’s neck, then slipping on a raincoat, walking off a 40-story building and sliding down a cable to the sidewalk and into a cab. Director Doug Liman is a hack, but we thank him at least for that scene.)On the whole, what David Thomson wrote in Salon regarding her performance in the 2001 Nicolas Cage vehicle "Gone in Sixty Seconds" remains true in 2005: "Angelina Jolie is … the kind of treasure that no one has the least idea how to handle." Most of her recent screen appearances have amounted to co-starring roles in big productions where she enters from a side door and then takes over the film — in "Shark Tale" as a pillow-lipped fish, the kind of femme fatale part she has never played on-screen; as the snake-wearing mother of Colin Farrell in "Alexander," in which the tedious Accent Police got on her for delivering her lines in a Slavic intonation that was actually the high energy mark of the film; and in "Sky Captain," where she’s hustled in and out of the story by filmmakers so astonishingly obtuse as to not realize that it’s Angelina we’re interested in and not some insipid romance between Jude Law and Gywneth Paltrow. Match Angelina with either one of them or get all three involved, and you’ve got a movie.Some critics are quick to suggest that Jolie’s dark and intense sexuality is part of the reason for her lack of box office success. There might be something to that. Jolie is less classically feminine than any A-list actress. Ultra-female she is, but not feminine. (Her one attempt at playing a standard woman’s role, the blond newscaster in "Life or Something Like It," doesn’t get off the ground until a scene where she goes punk and leads a group of striking bus workers in singing "Satisfaction.") I don’t think her inability to play conventional women’s roles limits her appeal to straight men — who, judging from the number of magazines calling her "the sexiest woman alive," are intrigued by her. If the number of female celebrities (Kate Beckinsale, most recently) who have gushed over her is any indication, she touches a chord in a lot of women. What Jolie’s razor-edged sexuality does do, however, is limit the kind of roles that she can be cast in.Film critics have always been fond of saying about a talented new actress that "you want to cast her in everything," but what’s remarkable about Jolie is how many roles you don’t want to see her in. She can play Lara Croft ‘ she might be the only actress who can play Lara Croft — but she’s unthinkable as a Charlie’s Angel (which she turned down) or in almost any part played in recent years by Cameron Diaz, Halle Berry or Meg Ryan. She’s too strong, too much of a presence — as her director in "Girl, Interrupted," James Mangold, put it, "She plays every role like it’s her movie." You can’t picture her in a James Bond movie because she’d take the movie away from whoever was playing Bond. (She might, however, as she herself suggested, be perfect as a Bond villain.) In fact, in virtually none of her films has she ever played a character defined by male concepts of traditional female sexuality. You wouldn’t want to see her as a hooker with a heart of gold, a frustrated suburban housewife or the loyal wife who roots her husband on to victory — in other words, about half the roles available to top Hollywood actresses. One of the best examples of the jujitsu Jolie can do on our attitudes toward movie sexuality was her performance in the elegant thriller "Original Sin," released in 2001. Instantly dismissed by critics — the fate of almost any film done in an odd style by an unknown director — "Original Sin" deserves a second look, particularly for the performances of Jolie and the sweetly reticent Antonio Banderas. Directed by Michael Cristofer, the playwright ("Shadow Box") who had previously directed Jolie in "Gia," "Original Sin" is a wonderful piece of stylish trash ("I loved it," Kael wrote on the envelope when she returned the copy I loaned her) made from the noir mystery "Waltz Into Darkness," by the cult favorite Cornell Woolrich (best known as the author of the story that became Hitchcock’s "Rear Window"). "Waltz Into Darkness" had been filmed before, most notably by Francois Truffaut in 1969 under the title "Mississippi Mermaid," starring Jean-Paul Belmondo and Catherine Deneuve. Woolrich’s novel, set in late 19th century New Orleans, is about a widower who takes a chance on a mail-order bride who turns out to be an enigmatic adventuress — like all men in these kinds of stories, he is pulled into a web of deceit and murder.Cristofer relocates the story to late 19th century Havana (actually shot in Mexico), probably to take advantage of the location and also to accommodate Banderas’ accent. Retooling the script around his female star, Cristofer retains its lurid pulp quality but turns the femme fatale theme on its head by letting Jolie’s character dominate the plot midway through the film. She stops being the victim or fantasy figure associated with the genre and becomes the protagonist. Jolie is terrific playing a character for which there is almost no movie precedent (the great Deneuve, in Truffaut’s version, played the role as the classic shallow man-trap). She is a woman who has suffered through every form of degradation, committed the grossest of crimes, and still believes in the possibilities of dignity and love. (In one remarkable scene, facing gang rape from vengeful gamblers whom she has cheated, she glares at her attackers as if to deny them, at least, the pleasure of seeing her suffer.)"Original Sin" is often scary stuff, particularly in scenes that look as if they were intended to reflect the dark corners of Jolie’s psyche. For instance, a scene in which she bonds with a lover performing a ritual with knives, a practice Jolie had often discussed in interviews. And in a sly joke, concealed from all but those who happen to catch it in the credits, the character of Satan in a stage production who is also her lover is played by her brother, James Haven. It’s as if Jolie was giving the finger to a press that foamed at the mouth when she told the world how much she loved her brother after winning the Oscar.If "Original Sin" had been a thriller in the traditional mode, it might have been a success, but critics and audiences alike were jolted by its weirder aspects and by the ways in which it subverted the noir themes — in other words, for probably the precise reasons that Jolie was drawn to the material in the first place.It isn’t so much that most of her other movies have been bad as the way in which they are bad. The writing in American movies has never been more abysmal, the characters not really written but sketched into what is always an action or sex comedy framework. (Nearly all Hollywood films are action movies or sex comedies; "Mr. and Mrs. Smith" tries to up the ante by splicing the genres.) Real actors must essentially do the work that screenwriters used to do and create their own characters from whole cloth. (Mike Newell, who directed one of her best roles in "Pushing Tin," conceded, "There really wasn’t much there on the page for her character. She filled in the blanks.") Jolie has done this in a long series of films that are notable mostly for her performances, movies that you might not see at all if you didn’t stumble on them while perusing the vast left field of cable TV. The combination of the young Jolie and Joyce Carol Oates’ unsparing novel about a high school girl gang should have produced a film that made her the James Dean of the ’90s. If the rest of "Foxfire" (1996) has been as tough as her portrayal of "Legs" Sadovsky it would have, but the script’s touchy-feely mode was at odds with Oates’ and Jolie’s edges. Her best role and her best performance before "Gia" was in "George Wallace," John Frankenheimer’s fine, too-little-seen television biography of the Alabama governor, in which Jolie played a status-hungry Southern girl forced into maturity when her husband is paralyzed by an assassin’s bullet.It’s intriguing to think what directions Jolie’s career might have gone in had she hooked up with a strong director like Frankenheimer at an earlier age. Meanwhile, we’re left to wonder why Hollywood’s best directors don’t get off their asses and build projects around the movies’ most exciting actress. Can’t Martin Scorsese see that Jolie’s energy is precisely the cure for the slack in his recent work? (Jolie would have ignited the role of Jenny, the pickpocket, in "Gangs of New York," but she would have looked as if she could have eaten Leonardo DiCaprio alive. Imagine if she had been paired off with Daniel Day-Lewis’ Bill the Butcher!) What’s wrong with Quentin Tarantino? Can’t he see that his work is now feeding off of itself and that what he needs to recharge is a dynamo like Jolie?This woman has much to tell us about our fantasies, fears and aspirations. But she can’t do it through the medium of supermarket tabloids. Are America’s best male filmmakers afraid, perhaps, that Angelina Jolie unleashed would threaten their status as auteurs? Because she would, you know.LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2005
#341: Schae, sorry I took a potshot at somebody you liked. I just cannot admire a person who rans away from an incident like that. When she got home, she could have sent somebody over to inquire about the one she hit. I didn’t need to be her, it could have been anybody that worked for her. If there hadn’t been any witnesses, would she have even admitted it? That calls for character and she didn’t show any in my book. I am glad that she has done good with others though. Maybe there’s hope for her after all.I still say her speech at the Oscar was way over the top. Perhaps it was all the excitement but there were a lot of barbs thrown in where there shouldn’t be.#347: Passing through, was the author of the article Lloyd Grove or Rush and Malloy? I think it was Lloyd Grove who banned Brad Pitt’s name in his column. He said he will never ever write that name in his column again for some reason. Maybe since they couldn’t go back on their word, they have hit on the closest target instead.
# 351 | cain -I love that show, don’t complaint please, beside BAMZ, this is the only site with the complete preview of prison break. I am hook on this show….;), I am a big fan too JJ.
passing through…very good! that reporter kinda takes the words out of your mouth. i totally agree with it. wicked post thankyou for sharing.
Most people who were not aware of Angie’s work since 2001 just got acquainted with it because of her relationship with BP. When Angie was asked during an interview what the difference is between the Clinton administration and Bush administration as far as her work as an ambassador, she refused to be political. When pressed further, she said that personally speaking non-Americans were more friendly to Americans at the beginning of her mission in 2001 than they are now. My opinion - Given the fact that Americans do not get so much of a good reception outside now, I think probably because of the war going on in Iraq, why is the media calling some few Americans who are trying to do good outside names like media whores? They say a prophet is not acceptable in his own country. No wonder Jesus performed 35 miracles in the New Testament and could not perform a single one in his own town. Makes me to wonder!
# 357 | Passing Through-thank for the article, I agreed with the author, beside "Gia", AJ’s second best work is in the "Original Sin". I actually like her role in " Sky Captain" as well, the movie would do better if she in it more, too bad…
Estelle…i totally agree with you! 100% girl interupted is a definate favourite on my list!i really liked what i saw of angie/frankie in sky captian, the movie had no strengh but angies parts were good!
#357: Passing through, that was a great article. I totally concur that she would have made a better Jenny in The Gangs of New York than Cameron Diaz. Didn’t know she was offered a part in Charlie’s Angels. The guy was right though, she couldn’t have been one of the 3 but she could have played the part played by Demi Moore, the fallen angel real well.That Sky Captain put me to sleep, really. So I missed Angelina’s part in it. I just returned the movie back without watching it again because I thought it was so boring with GP and JL, why would I go through that torture again. GP annoys me with mealymouthed portrayals of anything but I did watch her stewardess movie (I forgot the title). It’s like she doesn’t open her mouth and she moves too slow for my liking. No energy.I think now that Angie’s getting more offers and her profile had been raised higher than it was, she’ll be able to do more roles that will do her justice. You know that HW always wants to go after who’s hot at the moment. For a while it had been Nicole Kidman but she’s not that big a draw with the ticket buyers.Jessica Alba and Scarlett Johansen are too young and mostly offered parts that bare their bodies so there’s not that much competition there. Reese Witherspoon is a very good actress but I don’t see her and Angie being rivals for roles. There’s a lot of other actresses who probably will compete for the same parts such as CZJ, Uma, Kate Beckinsale, Charlize (but I think she’s another boring presence even if she did win an Oscar), Julia and who else?
# 364 | the real tita - I read somewhere that Drew Barrymore called AJ and offer her DM’s part in CA3, but AJ was busy. I was wishing that AJ will play the female part in the movie " Da Vinci Code", while reading the book, I always pictures the character face as AJ, but now with Tom Hanks as the leading man, I guess I am glad she is not in the movie…TH and AJ?
# 359 | Estelle Don’t worry! I was just wondering since I see it here so often. Haven’t seen the show myself personally so I don’t have an opinion.# 357 | Passing Through Excellent Excellent article. I can respect any writer that bothers to find out about the true background of a person and not just what was stolen by another clueless writer.
# 359 | Estelle Don’t worry! I was just wondering since I see it here so often. Haven’t seen the show myself personally so I don’t have an opinion.# 357 | Passing Through Excellent Excellent article. I can respect any writer that bothers to find out about the true background of a person and not just what was stolen from another clueless writer.
There’s a lot of other actresses who probably will compete for the same parts such as CZJ, Uma, Kate Beckinsale, Charlize (but I think she’s another boring presence even if she did win an Oscar), Julia and who else?# 364 | the real tita They all bring a different screen presence and I’m not sure they have the fierceness that Angelina does. She truely does cast almost everyone else in a pale light whenever she’s on screen. This is evident enough from watching the Sky Captain. Jude? Nah. Gweneth? Nah. Angelina? Yes!I want more birthing stories! Those were hilarious.
This is where they may be getting married.http://www.namibian.org/travel/lodging/private/sesfontein.htm
Passing ThroughWow, that was an awesome article. Link, please. I want to print this out for my sisters. Angelina Jolie is so misunderstood. She defies hollywood’s convention, that’s why no one knows what to do with her. Great Screen Presence. This is exactly what she has and it’s no wonder most people are intimidated by her.Is it possible to admire this woman more and more every day…..because I do. To thinks she is only in her early thirties. Can’t imagine what she’d be like in her fourties but I am sure she’ll be just as amazing.
hey my little chums, im signing off now, i got work in the morning so ill chat with you tomorrow. as for now im going to bed. take care till then.
It so great that Angie was able to work with Robert Deniro and that Richard Rodriguz(sp) is waiting for her befor starting the filming of Sin City 2.I think better projects that will use all her talents will be coming her way.
Passing ThroughWonderful article. Thank you.Really, what are those Hollywood big shots waiting for? They need to write more parts specifically for her!
Hello fellow bamz+1 fans! How are you guys doing? Dandy I bet. Hi Real Tita!! Kamusta ka? I’m–scratch that– Mabuti naman po ako..lol.Hmm i think this will be my 3rd? time posting after being the first (who cares) but i totally need to catch up on reading the posts. I just read a few so far..here it goes:# 283 | 2 SEC FILM by AGNiiicccccccceeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!# 301 | stef hahaha omg lmao#357 | Passing Through I love the article, thanks for posting that. Sky captain was dark…i was like come on turn the lights on, but I indeed love AJ’s presence in that movie. Like real tita, I doozed off on some parts—not AJ’s parts though. >_She truely does cast almost everyone else in a pale light whenever she’s on screen. This is evident enough from watching the Sky Captain. Jude? Nah. Gweneth? Nah. Angelina? Yes!# 368 | Susie I feel the same way.-still on the countdown mode..dun dun dun. I truly cannot wait!!!!!!
# 357 | Passing ThroughThanks for postin that inspiring article rticle. This article is reinforcing what I always admired and loved about this woman. You know, I live in a rather small - still male dominated - caribbean country, where, to my regret, I cannot - not on a daily basis - chat,discuss, or exchange ideas with enlighted women and men posting on you are on these threads. so Articles like these, posts from enlighted, inspring posters, those free spirits, educated souls as you all are…, really make my day…oefff.. . Empowering, that is the world. If ever a woman, a couple brought a unique group like this together. it is her, for that I will be ever grateful to her and Brad for being a man, oh gosh, …. getting mellow here… must be weeekend. Anway…. BAMZ+1 forever.. Madame Jolie has style, it’s not that she is one of the best actresses, it’s he character.Be your own, do your thing, don’t be afraid….Yes, this girl got game…BAMZ always,..Nice weekend all, got to do my hobby. As I said I think last week I actually do sing in the weekends. FUNNYYYY!,DOEI…
Pages: « 1 … 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 … 19 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!