Tue, 16 May 2006 at 12:00 am
Jennifer Aniston Not Sexy?
Actress Jennifer Aniston, 37, barely made the Maxim 100 Sexiest Women 2006. Aniston sank to rank #99! A penny for your thoughts? Enjoy these new stills of on-screen and off-screen couple Vince Vaughn and Jennifer Aniston from their upcoming film, The Break-Up opening in theaters nationwide on June 2nd.

Older











249 Comments
#150 YOU ARE SO effing FUNNY!!! I mean that in the right way.
one day your beloved angelina will hit the road very hard with her so high raised profile as philanthropist.i just cannot stand this one sided support of brangelina on this side.just jared gets boring
If you want to compare acting, JA wins it but as for looks, I have to admit AJ is hot. JA should stick to Rachel Green and fashion & AJ should stick to saving starving children and magazine spreds.# 109 | NO one can act I must step in:What exactly do you consider a good movie? Popcorn fluff?Aniston has made a slew of BAD movies. Angelina has made a few bad movies but a LOT of good ones as well. Gia and Girl Interruptedbeing two of them! You see they were good movies and she was so good in them that she was given A Golden Globe for both and An Oscar for one. I don’t think Jen can say the same. As for Alexander Oliver Stone, one of Hollywood’s legendary director’s, thought enough of Angelina’s talents to cast her. I don’t see him hunting down Jennifer and let’s not forget the two Tomb Raiders that grossed well over the $300 million mark. Aniston will never see numbers like this. And while I believe "The Break Up" will probably be her biggest box office total to date, I doubt she and Vince will see the $500 million(not including DVD sales which brought its totals to $586 million) mark that Mr. and Mrs. Smith has made and is still adding to (Unrated will be released in June).So as far as whose the better actress goes, Angelina wins hands down, especially since she’s acquired 3 Golden Globes, an Oscar, 2 SAG awards, a Broadcast Film Critics Association Award, a Fantasy & Horror Films award, 2 Blockbuster Entertainment Awards, National Board of Review award, Golden Satellite Award, and a ShoWest Award.And before you go there, we know Jennifer has won her share of awards, but the point is she hasn’t won an Oscar or received an Oscar nomination and in Hollywood those two ranks are what counts Oh and Angelina received all her awards by the age of 25 and as of 2005 you can add another award, one I doubt Aniston will ever strive to achieve for:Humanitarian of the Year.Now who’s the better actress?
one day your beloved angelina will hit the road very hard with her so high raised profile as philanthropist.i just cannot stand this one sided support of brangelina on this side.just jared gets boring # 153 | anonymous THEN WHY ARE YOU HERE???If you can’t stand the one-sided support of Angelina on an Angelina site/ thread then LEAVE!! Go to another site where there are others who have as negative an opinion of her as you do.Then you’ll feel right at home. What’s your deal with Angelina’s humanitarian efforts? At least she helping or would you feel more justified if she just sat on her ass and did nothing? Then you could really *****!Please! Her efforts are helping those in need. Exactly what do you find so damn bad about that?
152 - Your post was so retarted, that I know way of even responding.
Was this contest using already designated women and you had to rank or pick one. That would mean she was given a gift by being put on the list. She is defintely losing her status regardless of her lack of talent and looks.Her current Friends w/Money has estimates on Mojo instead of actuals, that usually denotes doing poorly. I can’t imagine this one doing poorly with this cast, but VV is playing the same old character too, ought to give the teeny bopper fangirls hours of Clueless watching.
150 Hmmmmmmm - I agree, its fun poking fun at X, I mean, if she had not been such a diry liar, i would not have anything against her. but once she went after Brad and Ang, it was on.
couldn’t help but comment. I understand that some of you really hate but should get you facts straight.Movies: JolieOriginal Sin Budget: 35 milion Worldwide Total: 42 million (+7 mill more than budget)Beyond Borders Budget: 35 mil (with clive) Worldwide: 11 million (-14 million)Alexander Budget: 155 million Worldwide: 167,300 million (+12 million)Aniston:Derailed Budget: 22 million (with clive) Worldwide: 57 million (+15 million)Along Came Polly Budget: 42 million worldwide: 171 million (+121 Million)Friends with Money Budget: 6 million USA (not world yet) 11 millionIn terms of dollars aniston way ahead until Jolie and Pitt teamed up. I think it was all about pitt. Since Aniston can make money expect to see a lot more of her unless she decides not.
Hmm so in other words, if pitt wasn’t with aniston then her past movies wouldve tanked too?
# 158 | fanNice biased list. Where is Lara Croft.
Yoo Hoo Fan, Stiller was the draw on along came Polly, just like Jim Carrey was for Almighty. Angelina has OSCARs, for cripes sakes grow-up and take off the rose colored glasses.
WTH aniston doesnt even act in along came polly and bruce almighty. It reached such success NOT BECAUSE OF HER. She only has about 5 % scene in those. If you wanna be fair why not compare the movies where these two woman are the leading lady.
# 158 / FanHe he he he, do you work for the Federal Govt? You do well with half truths and misdirection. Paging the Congress, you’ll do very well in that environment.
# 158 | fan You forgot Tomb Raider 1 & 2, Pushing Tin, Girl, Interrupted, and Gia you idiot! And mind you, Angelina HEADLINES. She’s on the friggin’ MARQUEE. Aniston is a SUPPORTING actress (if you can call her that). The films that did well, were because she was the sidekick, not the focus. IDIOT!
# 158 | fan What a biased comparison! Aniston was never in the same league of Jolie’s, who was and is a HW A-List, while Aniston is only a TV star. She’s been trying to make fuss on Big screen. However, you know what she’s got so far? Derailed, Rumor Has it, … all bumped!
Whatever the ahters says. MY SUPPORT GOES TO ANGELINA. LOVE HER. CARE LESS ABOUT ANISTON.
I hate seeing Jennifer Aniston’s face and hearing Jennifer Aniston’s name she’s so annoying. He face is just too ugly for movies. She can’t act, and is very unlikable. Don’t studios realise that yet?
JA plays the same character in every movie. Boring. She’s getting way too old for the coy Rachel stuff. She’ll never have a real movie career and had better start lining up tv parts. Better yet, she should count her money and retire!
MMS made about $476 mil world wide. Angie is 1000X better than the fugly maniston. that chin must go away from the silver screen. FAN is an idiot!!
laughing aloud. I didn’t realised that JA was in Bruce Almighty. I watched it because of Carrey. Too funny finding out she was in that movie ..she was so transparent … like a fly hoovering past . Anyway, most of her movies have very weak story line , either that or she is not impressionable. I can’t nail anything "outstanding" or significant about her roles in any of her movie.
fly hoovering past indeed. she kept the same hair style in every movie, just by seeing the posters made me bored already.
# 158 | fan Sorry to burst your bubble, Derail, RHI, FWM was consider boxoffice failure from the HW critique. Film budget for FWM was only 6 million? but didn’t Jen earn 9 million per film ? and to inform you, Aniston does not had international market unlike her ex. her film in foreign market prove worse than the domestic one.
# 164 | BeLinDa I want to add Bone collector with Danzel Washington and the one with Nicholas Cage.(I forget the movie title) those two movies were consider hit, make more than 100 million in domest market. and Angelina was good on both role from movie critique.
173 | toBeLinDa GONE IN SIXTY SECONDS
Gosh, I really hope this movie will do well, because when I was looking at the faces that Jen was doing during the movie premiere of FWM, I remember saying to myself: "If this movie bombs, this woman is going to have a nervous "COMPLETLY" breakdown." I’m sorry, even if it is an indie movie, FWM is not doing good at all, because the producers were counting on Jen "starpower" to bring the audiance. Also, I think that the word "Friends" was a way to attract all the Friends fanatics to the theatre. So, the movie did bomb and Jen didn’t have a nervous breakdown.Even though I just adore BAMZ + 1, I have anything against a woman who is doing the impossible to be successful in her career. But, I just saw the trailer and, I don’t think this movie is funny at all. Nothing new and, actually, no one in the theatre really laugh during the preview. But, who knows, maybe it will be a huge hit, but I really doubt it. Right now, I’m sorry, but SHE REALLY NEEDS a huge hit.What’s even worst is that there are buzzes for Oscar noms for both Brad and Angie upcomming movies. If they do (BOTH) get nomminated, Jen will definitely have the nervous breakdown. But, recently, everytime I’ve been looking at her pics (not photoshoped pics), but like the ones in the previous thread (The Arquette thread), I started to think that, emotionally, Jen is not doing well at all. If you’re a true fan of her, you won’t deny it. She needs help and, the best way to get this help is go away and grieve. Maybe she’s actually having a nervous breakdown in front of us. Ithink, right now, she should just quit acting for a while and come back with a HIT. But, she kept doing those back to back movies, which is not good at all for a girl who is not YET considered as a good actress. Come on, RHI’ Derailed, FWM, and TBU in less than a year! That’s what we called overexposure and, the sad thing is, none of them were hit.
Pages: « 1 … 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!