Brad & Angelina: Water Fountain

it’s angelina . I remember watching the video on some paparazi site. It was a short video of them laughing and drinking water by the water cooler… no big deal.

Zenmaster- Can AJ still fly? If it is possible, then I secretly wish that they do fly somewhere else, just to stick it to those papz. Make the papz look like the idiots they are.

Oh for crying out lot please don’t start with fake pics. I am posting a link that has practically all of Angies vidoes, scroll down at the far right side is Angies double and an interview with her, It’s called body doubles exposed, plus I have seen these pics before it’s on the MAMS set. http://angiejolie.free.fr/videotvshow.htm

#52 |Passing Through|-Thanks for correcting me in this.

# 56 | COLD HARD MATH - Thanks for the Link

# 55 | guli -thank goodness you post first…I was going to say the same thing…first fake BP’s pic now fake AJ’s?…yeah, we don’t need to go there…

Since it’s still slow on the baby news front I thought I’d pass on a few storis from my BP database search of newspapers - US, UK & AU mainly. It’s amazing how often reporters report the "news" incorrectly…most of it seems to be his opinion….++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Copyright 2006 Guardian Newspapers LimitedAll Rights Reserved The Observer (England)March 19, 2006SECTION: OBSERVER COMMENT PAGES; Pg. 43LENGTH: 1672 wordsHEADLINE: 7 days: The Observer profile: Brangelina Two stars equals a supernova: No invitations, no party and no wedding.Yet. So why have star-spotters turned their gaze on a village near Lake Como? Because Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are the most potent celebrity brand on the planetBYLINE: Paul HarrisBODY:The shores of Lake Como have seen it all before. The beautiful waters, surrounded by soaring peaks and skirted by gorgeous villas, have long attracted their fair share of the rich, the famous or the just plain fabulous.But even George Clooney, the Oscar-winning actor and director who lives by the lake and is surely used to unwanted attention, will have been amazed by the media circus that has descended. Clooney’s cream-coloured villa at Laglio, a hamlet nestling between the lake and surrounding hills, is the centre of a tabloid frenzy. All of Lake Como is now firmly within the sights of an army of paparazzi.Rumours are rife. Is this when the Big Day will finally arrive? Will Clooney’s exotic estate, or the nearby luxury hotel of Villa d’Este, be the ‘oh so perfect’ setting for the ‘oh so perfect’ marriage of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. If so, it will see the consummation of more than just a relationship between two of the most beautiful people on the planet; it will be the merger of two of the most powerful brand names in Hollywood and the final birth of a new one: Brangelina. In a world where celebrity seems ever more cheapened, where a multitude of reality television stars have redefined how easy it is to be famous for 15 minutes, there has been a small set of ultra-celebrities swimming against the tide. They have been merging their fame, not diminishing it. Just like office romances writ large, celebrities have been dating other celebrities and joining together. Witness Bennifer: the relationship between Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck. Or TomKat: the increasingly bizarre engagement of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes. And now none is bigger than Brangelina.The phenomenon has been the subject of earnest analysis in the popular press, Academics have been consulted and trend researchers interviewed. More justifiably, it has been lampooned on the late-night American comedy shows, most notably by Comedy Central’s fake news anchor Stephen Colbert, who suggested actors William H Macy and Felicity Huffman should combine to form Filliam H Muffman.But behind the gags, Brangelina is a concept that is genuinely hard to beat. Even the celebrity-weary or the just plain not interested will find it hard to ignore the idea that two of the most beautiful people on earth might be about to get married. It is like the two most attractive children in school getting it together, but on a planetary scale. They make Posh and Becks look parochial.Certainly, there is no denying that Pitt and Jolie are each enormous celebrities in their own right. Pitt is widely seen as the most attractive man in the movie business, with a legion of fans wowed by his piercing eyes and muscular body. Jolie is an obsession of the male half of the world, combining bee-sting lips with a full figure that defies the obsession with skinniness that rules most celebrities’ lives.Both have mixed ‘popcorn’ movie roles with more serious projects. Pitt has mingled playing the buff Achilles in Troy with more daring choices such as the male lead in the gritty Fight Club . Jolie has shown off her physique in the Tomb Raider action series, but is also an Oscar winner for Girl InterruptedThough Jolie is already carrying Pitt’s unborn child, their wedding (should it actually occur) already comes pre-packaged with two young kids: the adopted children of Jolie, one each from Cambodia and Ethiopia. If the emergence of Brangelina means anything at all (and many might say it does not), it shows that in this modern, media-drenched age, celebrities can still be different to the rest of us.Brangelina was born, if reports are to be believed, on the set of a movie. That is probably a fitting enough place as any. Pitt and Jolie were playing opposite each other in the action film Mr & Mrs Smith , a discardable 2005 flick about a pair of assassins who are married to each other, but unaware of their respective professions. The movie disappointed most critics, but rustled up enough viewers to pass muster at the box office. Where it did succeed, however, was in its on-screen stars’ sexual chemistry - there was real-life sizzle between the two leads.In the usual way of these things, the relationship was at first strenuously denied. That was no surprise. Jolie is famously guarded about her private life. She has had two failed marriages already (to actors Jonny Lee Miller and Billy Bob Thornton) and during her entire career has had to contend with a reputation for being more than a little wild. After all, she once proudly wore a vial of Thornton’s blood around her neck and has frequently fought off suggestions that she has an incestuous relationship with her brother.Pitt, meanwhile, had a more mainstream fan base to lose. He was, pre-Brangelina, already part of the most famous couple in Hollywood due to his marriage to Jennifer Aniston, the Friends heart-throb.She is America’s sweetheart, popular with women in Middle America, regularly graces talk shows such as Oprah and is frequently a cover girl on bestselling magazines. Leaving Aniston for a wild child such as Jolie was a dangerous move. But it proved too tempting for both Pitt and the tabloid editors who quickly framed the love triangle as a ‘good versus evil’ battle that saw America choosing sides.T-shirts sprang up around the country with a slogan announcing the wearer as part of Team Jolie or Team Aniston. In the sort of meta-irony that is becoming ever more common, other celebrities began wearing them, too.Magazine articles profiled the sort of women it believed were backing each camp. Team Aniston members were claimed to be wronged and the abandoned and the girls-next-door, while Team Jolie was made up of vixens, ‘the other women’ and those who felt Aniston asked for it by pursuing her own career. To the uninitiated, it might have seemed an even match-up, but in the end, there was only ever going to be one winner: Brangelina. Such was Brangelina’s power that Aniston herself, once one of the major power players in Hollywood, has now come to be defined by it. Just last week, she complained to Vogue that she was tired of being in the ’sick, twisted Bermuda Triangle’ that coverage of Brangelina had become.’It makes my skin crawl,’ she said. Her choice of adjective was no accident either.Aniston’s career and whole media image, carefully crafted over a decade, has indeed disappeared into the ravenous monster that is Brangelina. Her career does now seem a ship lost at sea.In the meantime, the world craves every detail of the Pitt-Jolie lifestyle. They have been reported as buying houses in Malibu, Paris and Washington DC. They have travelled the world for good causes. They have been to Ethiopia together and even visited Haiti’s capital, Port-au-Prince.There, they toured the slums of one of the most impoverished nations on earth, perhaps hoping that just a tiny fraction of the attention lavished on them would rub off on the desperate people of that country. If so, they probably hoped in vain. God alone knows what Haitians felt about it all.Instead, America and the world have continued breathlessly to follow Jolie’s pregnancy and analysed what it means that her two adopted children have now taken Pitt’s name (prompting one Hollywood wag to wonder what it would do to a child to grow up with the surname Pitt-Jolie and turn out to be ugly).But how is this possible? Why is the world obsessed with Brangelina? In some ways, there is nothing that looks so new as old news. People have always loved a good story of gossip and infidelity, whether it was the toings and froings of Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton or of Marilyn Monroe and her many lovers.The story of the wronged woman versus the seductress is as old as Hollywood. Older, in fact. People have loved tales of love affairs gone awry going right back to Helen of Troy.But Brangelina is an epic taking place in the age of the internet, of newsagents’ shelves groaning with gossip magazines and of whole television channels devoted to the reporting of entertainment news. It is no wonder that Brangelina is a multi-headed media monster invading every spare column inch.At the same time too, perhaps Brangelina is a necessary distraction. Away from the showbusiness columns, the rest of the newspapers, especially in America, are filled with doom and gloom. The war in Iraq drags on ceaselessly, bird flu is spreading across the globe, the climate is warming and the administration of President George W Bush lurches from crisis to crisis. It is grim stuff.It is no wonder Americans are turning to Brangelina just to take their minds off things. The couple are a fitting tonic for the woes of the modern world. For if Nero fiddled while Rome burned, then we distract ourselves with the click of a paparazzo’s camera.The Bangelina lowdownBorn Brangelina itself was born on the set of Mr & Mrs Smith , a Hollywood blockbuster released last year in which they played married assassins. In the real world, Angelina Jolie Voight was born 4 June 1975, the daughter of actors Jon Voight and Marcheline Bertrand. William Bradley Pitt was born on 18 December 1963, in Shawnee, Oklahoma.Best of times Come on? They are Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. They are rich, together and so beautiful it actually hurts. Do they ever not have a good time?Worst of times The inevitable break-up to come and the ‘I told you so look’ that Jennifer Aniston will be wearing for at least a year.What they say ‘I need someone physically stronger than me. . . I am always on top. It’s really unfortunate. I am begging for the man that can put me on the bottom. Or the woman. Anybody that can take me down’ - Angelina Jolie on what she looks for in a lover.’Who cares what I think China should do? They hand me a script. I’m a grown man who puts on make-up’ - Brad Pitt on actors speaking out on political issues.What others say ‘[Their lovemaking] sounded like a wounded animal. Like someone being killed’ - an ‘insider’ at a safari lodge talking to Star magazine after the pair holidayed in Africa.

Here’s a story on another supposed architectural project that feel through….++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Copyright 2006 The Press Association LimitedAll Rights Reserved Press Association NewsfileJanuary 6, 2006 FridaySECTION: HOME NEWSLENGTH: 493 wordsHEADLINE: PITT `COOLS’ ON SEAFRONT COMPLEXBYLINE: Anna Farley, PABODY:Brad Pitt may not be as involved in a multi-million pound seafront development as previously thought, it has emerged.The Hollywood star was understood to have teamed up with Frank Gehry, one of the world’s leading architects, to help design part of a £290 million residential and leisure complex in Hove, East Sussex.And developers Karis even suggested he might buy one of the luxury penthouse apartments at the eye-catching King Alfred development. Josh Arghiros, chairman and chief executive of Karis, told the Press Association in May: “He was there at inception and will be involved all the way.“Frank has asked him to take on the design of one of the restaurants and one of the penthouse flats. Brad is looking for a place to live in Britain and it may well be that he’ll take one of the flats in Brighton.”But Mr Gehry, whose designs include the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao and the Maggie’s Centre in Dundee, is quoted in US magazine Newsweek as saying that when he asked Pitt if he would like to be involved in the project only he said “maybe”.“We were - I don’t know if we are any more - working in Brighton, England, and the guys at Brighton knew I knew Brad Pitt and knew he was interested in architecture,” Mr Gehry is reported to have said.“And they asked me if he would like to participate and design the bar, or an apartment or something. So I called him and asked him and he said maybe.“And he came by the office and looked at it, and somebody here took a picture of him leaning over the model next to me. I don’t know how it got into the press. My guys didn’t do it. Somebody took that picture, he must have sent it to somebody or we must have inadvertently sent it to somebody.“From that day, I’ve never heard from him.”A spokeswoman for Karis said today: “(Pitt) has been involved in the project. We have photos of him working on the King Alfred project.”But she said she did not know what the star’s role in the project was at the moment.“We haven’t commissioned Brad to work on the scheme,” she said.“We don’t have any direct contact with Brad Pitt. Brad’s involvement has always been through Frank.”She added: “We never sought to promote that (celebrity) element of the scheme.”She said Mr Gehry was due to visit the southcoast resort in connection with the project later this month.In an interview in 2004, Pitt spoke of his love for architecture and his respect for Gehry.He told Vanity Fair magazine: “I’m really into architecture, structure and design. Give me anything and I’ll design it. I’m a bit nutty with it.”He added: “I’ve got a few men I respect very much and one would be Frank Gehry. He said to me, ‘If you know where it’s going, it’s not worth doing.’That’s become like a mantra for me. That’s the life of the artist.”A spokesman for Brighton and Hove City Council said as Karis had submitted a planning application for the 750-flat and £40 million sports centre development, he was unable to comment.

What others say ‘[Their lovemaking] sounded like a wounded animal. Like someone being killed’ - an ‘insider’ at a safari lodge talking to Star magazine after the pair holidayed in Africa.wow… my I knew it..lol… go Brad take her down!

Yes sara, on her last concert. Damn i wish she announced the news b4 florida..when i saw her in daygo. Whhoooo bamz+

# 58 | pm | I know the one you are talking about, it was around the same time BP gave the Diane Sawyer interview. I have it saved somewhere give me a second unless someone else posts it before me :)

Never let it be said that I only passed on the articles that only praised B/A. I give you all in one article - the good, the bad and the ugly…++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Copyright 2005 MediaNews Group, Inc. and New England Newspaper Group Inc. The Berkshire Eagle (Pittsfield, Massachusetts)December 9, 2005 FridaySECTION: MILTON BASSLENGTH: 1101 wordsHEADLINE: Sympathy for BradBYLINE: Milton BassBODY:Sunday, December 11 RICHMONDWITH EVERYTHING else that’s been going on — war, tsunamis, hurricanes, earthquakes, Christmas — one of you may have missed the fact that actors Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt were divorced earlier this year. It seemed to have come as much of a surprise to Jennifer as to everyone else.I had a bad feeling about the marriage of the "perfect" couple after seeing Jennifer on the Dave Letterman show not too long after she hooked up "permanently" with Brad. Letterman inquired about their first date and she reported that they had been fixed up by friends [managers] and they had met in a rented hotel suite. "We never left the room that night," she reported. "We had room service and just stayed there all night." Dave seemed as appalled as I by the bad taste of this "romantic episode" and changed the subject.We, the public, have no idea how smart entertainment icons might be. We know they are good to look at and have a natural sense of timing and can play make believe better than most, but whether they have enough fingers and toes to manage their economic lives or enough perception to know when water is boiling is usually beyond our ken. If they make it big, they have legions of underlings who handle all mundane matters.When we do know a little about the star’s qualities, it comes from interviews and public statements made in response to reputable journalists rather than supermarket tabloids and fan magazines although lately it has been difficult to tell the difference between the two.My family makes fun of me because I like looking at attractive women. Their basis for the teasing is that I quite often watch certain television programs because I find the female lead pleasant to behold. [I also like to look at my wife. She should be on television.] When the program is over, I groan at the dumb plot, the stupid dialogue and the weak acting, and they ask me why I wasted the time watching it for a half or full hour, and I say it is because I like to look at Jennifer Aniston or Catherine Bell or the blonde on "Cold Case" whose name I have never bothered to stick in my brain file.I have seen Pitt in a few movies but am unmoved by his looks and less than impressed by his acting. The last time I tried was when he played Achilles in the movie "Troy," but all I could stand was about a third of this tedious attempt at the Homeric epic. After turning off the DVD, I dug out my copy of the "Iliad" and read it for about an hour. Then I put it away again. Thank you, Brad Pitt.The breakup of the marriage, however, is sticking in my mind because Jennifer is getting all the magazine covers and sympathetic stories while Brad is being shunted aside as a boy toy for the weird Angelina Jolie. This 30-year-old woman is rather bizarre with her numerous body tattoos and international wanderings as a United Nations goodwill ambassador. She is the adoptive mother of Ethiopian and Cambodian infants and is usually seen with one or the other clasped to her bosom. And she pops up in all the places that God has torn asunder the past couple of years, talking to refugees who huddle around her as if she were a soft porn Mother Teresa.What she is doing is important because it brings public attention to areas that were devastated by nature and abandoned by all the countries that promised aid when disaster first struck. Just as President Bush and the U.S. Congress have reneged on most of the aid they promised to victims of Katrina, Rita and Wilma, so it is in Pakistan as the winter closes in on the hundreds of thousands still without adequate shelter and supplies. But the cameras follow Angelina wherever she goes and the public gets another look at what horrors still exist.Brad and Angelina discovered each other while making a spy movie titled "Mr. & Mrs. Smith," which garnered a most respectable box-office last summer strictly on the sexual affinities of the two stars. They also discovered each other, which ostensibly led to the breakup between Pitt and Aniston.The thousands of journalists who have written on this subject all seem to feel that the breakup was caused by sex. I believe it was caused by politics. It is possible that being married to America’s current sweetheart might have become rather mundane to Pitt, and Jolie’s much-publicized sexual freakiness might have been temporarily alluring, but I feel it goes deeper than that. The 42-year-old multi-millionaire probably contemplated the kind of life ahead of him — trying to stay beautiful while making more movies like the Smith saga and going to openings with Jennifer — and decided he wanted more.One of his best friends is George Clooney, the politically active actor who tries to do consequential movies as well as claptrap. Aniston has four meaningless movies coming out in the next several months and spends an inordinate amount of effort trying to fend off what nature is inevitably doing to her body. She is a beautiful and reportedly charitable person who is most likable. Jolie keeps in shape by making a movie now and then but spending the rest of the time traveling to the devastated places in the world and adopting children who otherwise wouldn’t have a shot in hell of leading happy lives.And now Pitt accompanies her, usually holding one of the kids, and looking very serious. He also takes notes in a black notebook. He recently sat still with Angelina while a spokesman for the Center for Global Development elucidated on world trade. Pitt spent the whole day listening to experts expound on the ins-and-outs of African nations and their needs for the future. He was a journalism major in college but quit just short of graduation to go into films where he became "the sexiest man alive."When asked what he thought of himself when he looked in the mirror, Pitt replied, "I should floss more." He is no dummy and obviously has yearnings for a more meaningful existence than the one he had with Jennifer Aniston. It is doubtful that Jolie is more than a stop on his journey because she lives in a world of her own that has little to do with Earth people. But I think we should cut Pitt and Jolie some slack because they are focusing our attention on the abandoned areas of our planet.P.S. The latest stir of the pot has Pitt seeking to legally adopt Jolie’s two adopted children. The legal ramifications of this could be infinite so I stop my personal coverage of this matter and turn you over to "Entertainment Tonight."Milton Bass is a regular Eagle contributor.

sorry meant birth not christening