Top Stories

Shiloh Nouvel Jolie Pitt Pictures

Shiloh Nouvel Jolie Pitt Pictures

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie got top dollar for the first pictures of baby Shiloh - but they made the weekly celeb glossies work for it. All the weekly magazine editors were summoned to the offices of the Getty photo agency at Canal and Varick late Saturday night. "We were sequestered into separate and un-air-conditioned offices," said one. "The photos were shown to us around 10 p.m. to midnight, and then we had to submit bids by 6 a.m. Sunday morning. No one got any sleep at all, as it was a manic game of phone-tag to top each other’s bids. I’m convinced it was Brangie’s revenge on the weekly magazines." The pictures went to People for $4.1 million.

12 hours later…  I present to you baby Shiloh Nouvel Jolie-Pitt.  She definitely has mommy’s luscious lips! Shiloh turns a whopping 10-days-old today. Worldwide fees for Shiloh’s baby pictures are reportedly going to bring in a total of $20 million to Brad and Angelina’s charity of choice.  Thanks, April!

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Sarah Jessica Parker on her twins: This is what we got - PopEater
  • Lindsay Lohan wears some torn-up tights - TheSuperficial
  • Bindi Irwin stars in a new Free Willy adventure - JustJaredJr
  • Zoe Saldana visits the Late Show - LaineyGossip
  • Robert Pattinson may be hitting the pages of Vogue - Celebuzz
  • Get the fashion roundup from the Nine premiere - PopSugar
  • Lourdes Leon and Madonna hit the red carpet together - Dlisted
Jemal Countess/Getty

684 Comments

Pages: « 17 8 9 [10] 11 12 1328 » Show All

This is a fake picture, people. 1) the kid has teeth. 2) he/she doesn’t even look caucasian, looks more asian like to me. 3) the magazine says June 13, 200x.4) why does Angelina still have the BillyBob tatoo on her arm?5) PEOPLE magazine won this bid. it cost them $4.1 million. they have exclusive rights. you think they’d just let any other magazine publish it? wouldn’t HELLO worry about being sued for this? it’s obviously fake people, get over it.

i love baby!and generally i find them beautiful!!and this one is beautiful too!!I LOVE BABIES!!!! THE PICTURE IS SO CUTE AND I LOVE THE BABY LIPS!CONGRATULATION TO BAMZ AND BAMZ’s fan§

This is a fake picture, people. 1) the kid has teeth. 2) he/she doesn’t even look caucasian, looks more asian like to me. 3) the magazine says June 13, 200x.4) why does Angelina still have the BillyBob tatoo on her arm?5) PEOPLE magazine won this bid. it cost them $4.1 million. they have exclusive rights. you think they’d just let any other magazine publish it? wouldn’t HELLO worry about being sued for this? it’s obviously fake people, get over it.

I forgot to mention that on HELLO magazine’s website, they don’t even have the picture. and they say that they will release the new issue with the Brangelina baby on June 8, 2006.I’m all excited about the picture as any of you are, but this picture is clearly fake.

But if this is her, she is as cute as a button. # 129 | khmey_srey ——————-And if it’s not her? Does that mean this baby is NOT cute as a button in your opinion. Some of you as so transparent.Speaking for myself, I dont’ think this is a particularly cute baby. Not ugly. But certainly not over the top cute either.

only curious @ 06/06/2006 at 2:44 pm

so, where did this picture come from?? Originate?

JARED!!!!This site is going to cause me to drink. what’s the deal hun????

lookwhaticando @ 06/06/2006 at 2:46 pm

Great they are turning the baby into a media ***** already!! # 207 | yuyu ++++++++++++++++++++Bascially Each and ever Hollywood Mom has posed with their new baby in People Mag or another major celeb Mag.. Brook Shields,, Jennifer Garner, Britny, Gwyneth Demi Moore, Madonna, Kate Hudson, Jessie(sp) Witterspoon, Sara Jessica Parker, Julia Roberts, Denise Richards, Live Taylor, Heidi Klum, C. Zeta Jones, Debra Messings Jude Law’s Wife, Courtney Cox, Michelle Williams, Russell Crowe, etc,, etc.. etc… NOW are all of them Media Whores, Or JUST Angie, I swear, you are really sad, Just come out and say you hate her. And stop trying to make her into something she is not. F’ing Hypocrite.

SHILOH THORNTON @ 06/06/2006 at 2:46 pm

THAT CHILD IS BILLY BOB’S - YOU CAN SEE THE RESEMBLANCE. SHE IS PRETTY BUT NOT BRAD’S KID, THAT’S FOR SURE!!

ENOUGH ABOUT THE F’ING PICS BEING FAKE.!!!!Every frigging time we have to go thru this. Thursday or whenever u’ll know if they are fake or not. Till then, just enjoy the pics and chill

Whatever you believe the child’s picture has raised $ 20 million to help other kids around the world. That’s the real miracle people!

# 229 | Yvonne HELLO is a UK publication. They probably got the rights for Britian. People magazine probably got the rights for North America. Paris Match probably got the rights to France and other French speaking countries and HOLA the parent company of Hello probably got the rights to all of South America and other Spanish speaking countries. I think HELLO put it up as a tease. It’s a nice cover but doesn’t it whet your appetite for more? They didn’t show you the complete layout. But I fear they may still be in some trouble for the leak.People underestimate the resourcefulness of BAMSZ fans!

Voting going on on eonline for those who prefer MAMS to the Beak Up.

Oh my gosh,she´s so cute!i´m so happy,God bless you Shiloh!

Original jpf @ 06/06/2006 at 3:01 pm

Would people allow those who DO believe the pictures to be real to do so, and if you don’t, so what? What is the big damn deal?! My goodnes, what harm is it doing to you who don’t believe that some don’t share your view? Why are you so bent out of fraaking shape about it?! I think they’re real, but so what if you don’t, it’s not even somthing this chica’s gonna lose sleep over. It’s seriously confusing why it’s so upsetting to some so much to the point of feeling they need to call others idiots, stupid, naive & duped. Why such drama?! We go through this once a week and it sucks much. This is not group think people! Make your choice and let others make theirs….DAMN!jpf

Alexanderina @ 06/06/2006 at 3:02 pm

# 235 | QQQQ | - ITA

QQQQ, #235: That is the funniest and most well-said (or -implied_) thing on this thread: just enjoy the pic [whether it's real or fake]! The whole subject is becoming like a religion to some people.I’m looking forward to see the real baby, or this being confirmed to be the real baby!

She’s adooooooooooorable!

Impressed @ 06/06/2006 at 3:09 pm

THIS IS THE MOST BEAUTIFUL BABY OF THE WHOLE UNIVERSE !!!

The picture is real. Glad for them and I think donating the proceeds to charity is great of them to do.

i am not a big fan of theirs…but she is adorbale!!! and if you notice…than hand that is over Shiloh would be Brad’s right hand…not his left where a wedding ring is worn……

here we go again @ 06/06/2006 at 3:12 pm

# 226 | Yvonne just because you put it in bold does not make it true. THOSE ARE NOT TEETH!!!! Even if that isn’t Shiloh look at the size of the baby compared to Brad’s hand. His hand almost covers the baby’s lower half! It is obviously a very young infant. This baby does look like she could be 10 days old. She was 7lbs which means she wasn’t scrawny. Breast fed babies also gain weight FAST. I know because I breast fed 3 children! Unless you have seen EVERY 10 day old baby in existance you can’t possibly say for sure that this child isn’t 10 days old. this baby does not look like she’s Asian…how can you even tell she’s lying down and her face is smooshed. Please you ‘people’ (and I’m trying to be nice here) are really pieces of the same idiotic work. # 234 | SHILOH THORNTONPlease put the keyboard down, turn the computer off and step away from the desk. Your age is showing. # 230 | excusa? All babies are beautiful, how cute they are is in the eye of the beholder. unless posters specifically say that ONLY SHILOH is as cute as a button, stop imposing your attitude and views on their remarks. No one said that this child wouldn’t be cute as a button if it weren’t Shiloh…so get over yourself and stop purposefully misinterpreting others post.Just as you all claim that to the BAMZS fans that this picture is fa ake. We could claim that the picture is authentic. So please spare us your savvy ‘know it all’ remarks as to why this picture is fake and the baby is not 10 days old. We’ll all know soon enough!

that’s strange, I don’t remember callling anyone an idiot, or stupid. I was excited too to see the picture at first, but as I looked closer, I couldn’t help but become more and more suspicious.so what if HELLO got the rights in the UK. why the hell would PEOPLE pay $4.1 million for the pictures if it could be leaked onto the internet so easily? and how are people who keep telling it’s real going to explain the June 14, 200X date on that mag, when HELLO’s website itself says that the issue will be out on June 8, 2006?of course, we’ll all know if I’m talking **** on June 8, meanwhile, if you believe it’s real, please do enjoy it.I personally just hate the feeling of being tricked into believing a fake picture, and I’d like to have the benifit of doubt.

Does the baby have teeth? Isn’t she only a week or so old?

shop girl @ 06/06/2006 at 3:19 pm

For those of you who won’t stop proclaiming that the picture is a fake: READ THIS, and stop already: http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_27266230.shtml

Pages: « 17 8 9 [10] 11 12 1328 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.