Britney Spears Naked in Harper's Bazaar
OH. MY. GAHHHHHHH. A black-haired Britney Spears bares it all (with strategically placed hands and arms) on the cover of the August 2006 issue of Harper’s Bazaar. The photo spread includes one pose with a pregnant Britney (in a black backless gown) carrying and covering 9-month-old son Sean Preston Federline’s bare baby butt. One more of Britney baring her burgeoning belly (wearing nothin’ but a g-string) lying down after the jump. YOWZA. High quality pictures in the gallery! Wow. Just WOW. There are no words.
UPDATE :: Apologies, images removed! Replaced with a a little Britney Spears by the sea — a hilarious side-by-side comparison of Britney and The Little Mermaid’s Ursula. In the gallery are pictures reportedly stolen and published by Us Weekly.








Older











189 Comments
very nice pics..I love Sean P.bye bye from ItalyIsabella
Wow…Umm holy airbrushing? I saw her on dateline and there was serious CHUNKAGE! Where did it go? Oh the magic of computers……
Thank you trullesand…as I see it. Most people here agree with us!#98…I agree with your perv statement too!Tealeaf…use your own name stop posting with mine. what most people are talking about is that she asked to be left alone and now she’s doing all this crap. And as for other celebs doing photo shoots. She already did one! And other celebs aren’t doing them naked after ASKING TO BE LEFT ALONE! She’s all over the map! SHE’S A NUT!!!!!Yes, most celebs use photo shop but they’re not naked on the cover! And the main point is SHE JUST ASKED TO BE LEFT ALONE!!!!She’s giving so many mixed signals…she’s losing her mind!There are a few that are compairing her to Ange and Mad but the main points are NAKED - PHOTO SHOP - NAKED - CHILD - And let’s see…really, why would you want to do this when a celeb has already done this? And she’s done something like this before she had Sean and said she regretted it…so why remove ALL your clothes now? Think she won’t say she regrets this more and blame the photographer again like she did before?
lol wow that is so shocking! haha i love Britney though and i think she looks great!
The real kellie, you brought up some valid points and you did it without using the usual adjectives like "trashy" or "dirty". I remember the photos that you’re talking. They’re the ones with her topless with only Mardi Gras beads covering her breasts and she did blame the photographer and admitted that she regretted it to Diane Sawyer. The difference was, it was way before she even met K-Fed and she did it to promote her album.Honestly, who would be jealous of her? She’s with Federline , she get scrutinized by the press and the public and she’s constantly stalked by the paparazzi. Sorry but I don’t think anyone on here would want those problems in his or hers life.Maybe, she’s doing these photo shoots for the money and just for the attention. Think about it, we have no idea how much money K-Fed had spent on making his album and how much she put into its production and promotion. For all we know, she’s doing these things to keep up with his spending.
Britney has pulled the pics. So it doesn’t look like they will come in the magazine after all.
Britney has claimed she wants to be left alone but she keeps putting herself in front of the public knowing that the reporters are going to bother her. I think she likes being in the spotlot and that doing stuff like this just proves.
Oh my god! She looks like a cast off from The Addams Family? Why would she do this??
# 48 | LOLOL I think you may be on to something with the whole wanting us to think she’s like Angelina thing. It’s a well documented fact that Brit is obsessed with Brad. Didn’t she even have a photo in a frame of the two of them or something? Didn’t she just show up the other day with the brunette hair? I wonder how these pics got in the magazine so fast when they usually have several months lead time and she is clearly very pregnant in them. Unless like someone said, it’s someone elses body. But I’m not here to start conspiracy theories. I think she looks good with the brunette hair, but there is no saving her now. I believe she is done.
Even whores can be airbrushed.
I have to admit she does look pretty good in these pictures , definitely better than a lot of pictures. The girl must be confused though, this is NOT the way to keep attention away from yourself. I do think it is trashy of her to do these pictures though.
she looks like demi moore a long time ago
gross.why why why do celebrities get nekkid pregnant pictures in magazines? i know I don’t want to see that.
OK…… u all complain about her saying were people leave us alone maybe did u think just maybe she is doing this so they do leave her alone ok maybe if she puts herself out there every now and then she wont be sucha big fascination adn she will get left alone. And as to the posing naked i think it is beautiful the female body especially when pregnant is a beautiful thing and should be appreciated not ridiculed. She may not be here best atm but she contributing to our world and i love her all the more for it. YOU GO BRITNEY!!!!!
AmayaYou have no right to call anyone stupid when you are the queen of stupid land. You are saying she goes shopping, she goe to the beacj, she goes to lunch….hello isn’t that like the everyday things we do. People just be criticizing **** they know nothing about. She should remain locked up in her house and that will prove she doesn’t want publicity. It’s one thing to consent for piture and it’s another to have people mob you when you are with you child. She almost dropped the baby and those MFs were clicking away. Personally I don’t like these pictures but to each is own. We have no right to pass judgement on the way others live. Leave the girl alone.Whoever brought up the Church and Holy, Holy talk, take it outside with your sanctimonious behind ‘k. This is a celebrity blog not your next conversion service.
Sarah From AustraliaThe only sensible comment on this blog.
The only thing sadder than Britney are Britney’s fans trying to defend her. She’s not worth it.
I love the pics and Brit adn I do love the new hair colore too
I think she looks FANTASTIC!!! For a woman who has had 2 kids in less than 2 years.. BRAVO!! It’s sad at how many jealous ppl there are in this world… I didnt hear complaints when Demi did it.. U go girl!!! And her son is such a CUTIE PATUTIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I personally don’t like her but I think the photos look good. Very Harper’s Bazaar. So many are used to looking a paparazzi photos that they have no idea what an art photography is. Bazaar is a fashion/art magazine. These are what the covers are usually like. Don’t get it twisted: the paparazzi and legit media are two different things. She should do like all the others and have a family/personal photographer on staff.Now the question, why is she on the cover? She has nothing to promote (that I know of) ,she is not a fashion icon and this is not her first pregnancy. The posing nude while pregnant was done 15 years ago with Demi Moore on the cover of Vanity Fair, so this idea for the cover is not new.
Way to rip off Demi Moore. AT LEAST BE ORIGINAL!
great airbrushing… jesus.
Nossa! Amei as fotos…O Sean é lindo, um fofucho e a barriga dela está linda..By Brazil
essa mulher é doidinha!!!!! idiota mesmo, vai fazer o que tipico de americano!!!!!
# 54 | Tealeaf ———————–I think the comparison being made was to Angie’s photo spread in some mag–not papz shots she set up in the park. Angie was in bed in her nightgown and Maddox seemed to be a "celebrity prop" in that professional photoshoot.Not saying that’s 100% wrong but both layouts just have that same tone that peeps is criticizing Brit for in these pics. Kids aren’t props, you know? Candid shots having fun with your kids is one thing. But posing them into your prof photo shoots seems like exploitation. jmo
Pages: « 1 … 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!