OlderBrad Pitt's Driver's License
A salesman faces trial for forging a labour card by pasting Hollywood actor Brad Pitt’s photo on it and an Arabic name.
The 29-year-old Jordanian, T.H., said he did not know whose photo it was he had downloaded from the internet. The Dubai Public Prosecution charged him with forgery, using a fake document and trying to embezzle Dh82,600 from a money exchange house in collaboration with his brother H.H., who works there as a teller.
An informant told police that T.H. was planning to collect the money in collaboration with his brother. Police arrested T.H. from a mall in Ghusais. In his statement to the police, he said his brother had informed him about the money which had not been collected. He confessed that he forged the card with Brad Pitt’s picture from a website.
A website, eh? Do you think T.H. took Brad Pitt’s picture from JustJared.com? I betcha he did. I betcha! I betcha! I betcha! And yes, Brad Pitt’s Driver’s License is a total fake if the name "Usama Bin Mohammed Bin Laden" printed on the card didn’t give it away… Thanks to Grace for the heads up!
Share This Post:
1,257 Comments
#1053 | COLD HARD MATH CHM - From what I remember reading the adoption papers were actually filed BEFORE the name change papers. I could try to hunt up the article, but I’m pretty sure it was on the People website. I’m not sure if they still have that BAMZS special section that they had up while waiting for Shiloh to be born, but thats where I saw the article on the adoption followed by the name change. Once they decided that Brad would adopt, then they ALL changed their names. I’m a dog with a bone!# 1055 | COLD HARD MATH LOL! I was just about to post the above message when I saw that you’d found the People article that I was talking about.
Passing Through - I understand you’re a Leo like myself!# 1060 | Tijen++++++++++++++Tijen - Acutally I’m a Virgo. I’m on the cusp between Leo & Virgo, but most astrologers list Aug 23 as Virgo. Some of the older almanacs say Leo. My younger sister is a Leo, so I’d rather be a Virgo. You know how that sibling stuff is!
# 1072 | Me Again! The Lake Havasu trip - Scottsdale AZ? I saw read a story on EA that gave teh date as Aug 1. If that’s accurate, then they couldn’t have gotten married then because Brad’s divorce wasn’t final. Personally I don’t think they got married until after the adoption papers were filed. I’d say sometime between Dec 5 and the end of the year.
For those interested…CNN Showbiz Tonight is on right now. The one with the preacher talking about Aj/BP
# 1073 | Jen sees Shiloh! | - Where did you post it?
# 1071 | Passing ThroughThanks! From what I can tell, so far, Namibia allows for the child to take her dad’s surname even if the parents aren’t married. Unfortunately, in some African countries the government and the mothers are having difficulty getting some of the men to acknowledge their children (this happens in the US too) so rules regarding the birth certficate are a little more flexible. I’m still trying to verify this though.I really don’t care if Brad and Angie are married. I believe them to be committed to each other marriage or no marriage. Long live the Jolie-Pitts!
From queebee Bradforums:If you guys remember a while back when leslie gornstein from the L.A times wrote that article about angelina shopping for kids? And how a whole bunch of us wrote an email to leslie and the L.A times. Well it looks like we weren’t the only ones outraged.www.latimes.com (go to entertainment section)http://blogher.org/node/7016the l.a times is trying to back peddle, saying it was meant to be a satire, who the hell do they think they’re fooling? certainly not us and certainly not these people who wrote in.like christina from pittwatch said "I think someone needs to re-read the definition of satire. This was no satire, this was a scathing blast against Brad and Angelina, and I guess she has received the attention she was looking for when writing it. Pitiful."On a poll they did almost 62% said that the articvle was unfunny and hurtful.here’s what the editors response was"The editors and writer Leslie Gornstein were satirizing a specific person, Angelina Jolie, who had remarked that her next adoption would depend on “which country, which race would fit best with the kids.” The satire was in no way intended to be a commentary on all individuals who adopt."yeaaaah pitiful!, and one more thing, no where was it listed in the article that this was satire. This is just plain shameful backpeddling, plain and simple!
sorry, it should’ve said: From Queenbee at Bradforums
we should write back and explain what satire means to this knuckleheads.
A satire is something different….and you say that appeard in L.A Times?…I believed that was a "serious" newspaper…Shame on them…
******JERRY FALLWELL*********He’s just trying to get in the media by underhandedly using AJ/BP to state his cause/schtick/racket. He’s no better than anyone pointing fingers. Jerry Falwell is the poster boy for the seven deadly sins. He’s passe.What’s interesting is that everyone automtatically thinks that the "out of wedlock" comment pertained to Jolie-Pitt and not TomKat or other couples. Tom Cruise, supposedly the biggest film star in the world and supposedly a homosexual, is not even on the radar with the out of wedlock birth of Suri by mama Kate Holmes. Miss Cindy Adams didn’t discuss him. I guess TC has to get married now and outdo Nicole Kidman to get on everyone’s radar again.Jolie-Pitt should copyright themselves because too many people are using their named for their own gain.
Jolie-Pitt should copyright themselves because too many people are using their named for their own gain. # 1086 | FrenchyI 2nd that!!
You know if they copyright themselves, people will tear them to pieces for being too arrogant. They can’t win!
How many people who write regularly on this site are the product of marriageless parents — just wondering - by this I mean mother and father living together raising children into adult hood - not how many of you were raised by a single parent either from death of one parent or divorce or pregnancy outside of marriage — so the question again is how many of you were raised in a two parent family but your parents wern’t married - your biological parents that is — and how do you feel about it?
# 1088 | ughyea either way they can’t win :sighs:
********I FEEL THEY ARE MARRIED******In my gut I think that Brad & Angelina are married. I haven’e always thought so but I would say from early on this year, their actions were leading me to think they had a quickie marriage. Also in this business when something is commonly known to insiders, there is no need to really ask certain questions. For instance if it already understood that a particular actor/actress is closted gay or lesbian you will never hear a reporter, who’s in the know, ask about a love life. So many reporters could have asked Brad or Angelina if they are married, But they haven’t. They have asked, when is the wedding? And as Angelina has said, "we don’t need a ceremony". Those are code words in my opinion. It’s propbably going to be harder now to ask as Brad is wary of discussing his personal life and Angelina taking his cues in being cautious about questions directed at her about he personal life.They will let the world know when they are ready to say. The haters will not sulk away. They will just twist things and say that BP & AJ decieved their fans (like they really care), that they lied, were sneaky, blah, blah , blah.I always thought that all a man had to do was acknowledge that a child is his and his name is given to the baby and on the birth certificate. How is it in Namibia?
#1089 ao - the issue is not for us to tell you how we feel about it because frankly I don’t think anyone should be point fingers to thoe raising kids out of wedlock when it is very likely that there is a high percentage of families with a married couple doing much worse than families with unmarried couples.In short, before , I, you or Mr Jerry something get all worked up about couples having kids out of wedlock, check the so called "right" family model - the married couple with kids - an ensure it is ALL RIGHT….100% without problems/flaws…and last but most important, that ONLY KIDS BORN IN A FAMILY WITH MARRIED MOM AND DAD…COME OUT FINE. As far as I know, it is false. Hence, no issue.case closed.
Good Night All, it has been a long day, talk to you all manana
| #1091 Frenchy |Angie has always said, we don’t need a WEDDING CEREMONY. Bingo! ITA. Those rings that BOTH of them wear mean something……..This time last year, LIVE 8 was going on. After that, Brad/Angie/Maddox were on their way to Ethiopia to pick up Zahara……….I’m out. Nite All!KEEP ON ROCKIN BAMZS!
# 1086 | Frenchy *****Exactly BP and AJ are not the only current "in couple "to have children out of wedlock. Big time stars as in Johnny Depp and Vanessa P? or Heath Ledger and Michelle Williams.I don’t know if BP and AJ are married but I think it would be cute if fact quite beautiful if the judgethat okays the adoption also married BP and AJ on the same day. # 1044 | Missouri Fan Amen, Bless BAMZS
alero, you are absolutely right. I dunoo why Brad & Angie is just the guilty ones. I know why, because they sympathize with the pathetic Aniston & whatever Brad & Ange do with their lives is always be seen in a bad light. That is why I admire Brad & Angelina more & more & hate & despise the moron Aniston.
I MISS BRAD SHILOH ANGIE I WANNA SEE PICTURE OF THEM? WHO THE HELL ARE????I NEED NEW PICS OF BAMZS!!!!!
alero and leira: I agree with both of you….I want to see new pics of Angie and Brad….Please…I hope both of them go together to the Toronto Film Festival…Can you picture them walking together on the red carpet?….Uauuuu
What exactly will happen if they copyright themselves? If it is a good idea we might want to write their attorney like someone did the other time when their pics were stolen. I wouldn’t mind them benefitting from those who use their name. Their name sells a lot of things because the most searched actress in Hollywood is Angie, but those who want to write about them and portray them negatively should at least contribute something to their charity for using their names.
# 1089 | ao |Not moi. My parents are both still alive and have been married 52 years. And your point in asking is what? That the "regulars" here are pro Jole-Pitt because we were "possibly" raised by a single parent? HUH?
Pages: « 1 … 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 … 51 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!