OlderFri, 04 August 2006 at 12:00 am
Jennifer Aniston: NEW DOG!!
Jennifer Aniston looks on the bright side of life, snuggling up with a new dog on the balcony of her digs in Los Angeles. A white-shepherd mix puppy, perhaps? Jen’s other constant companion that you may be familiar with is Norman, a Corgi-Terrier mix dog that she got from the animal trainers on Friends. Boyfriend (though they still haven’t confirmed) Vince Vaughn was MIA… More pictures in the gallery!
[Can we leave the hate comments out
of this post? Please and thank-you!]
of this post? Please and thank-you!]
Share This Post:
274 Comments
Wow!! She’s so cute and fresh!Jen is the most beautiful and adorable actress on earth! I love her!!!
No. 168, please read what BBT said about AJ, AFTER the divorce. I hope it says tons abouther. How about the MANIPULATIVE, NO-talentAniston? Better not going there!"Instant family"? WHAT makes you think so?!They are together in life and in work, NEVERbeen separated in almost two years. They HAVEthree ADORABLE kids, one of them biological.They may even have a dog, and a balcony!
No. 168, please read what BBT said about AJ, AFTER the divorce. I hope it says tons abouther. How about the MANIPULATIVE, NO-talentAniston? Better not going there!"Instant family"? WHAT makes you think so?!They are together in life and in work, NEVERbeen separated in almost two years. They HAVEthree ADORABLE kids, one of them biological.They may even have a dog, and a balcony!
Sorry for the double post.
Sorry for the typos and incorrect subject verb agreement (believe me I know the correct way) It has been a very long day! Oh yeah here is something else-I don’t know how the Aniston fans feel about Huvane (would be interesting to know) but I think he is terrible-He dimishes her as a person in everything he does-Ok she was a sitcom star-ok she divorced Brad Pitt-Ok she has a great body-we get that-but why is she not known for her artistic ability-she is always accused of tanning and partying (which has some validity) but where are the pictures of the jewlry she makes and gives to friends? Whatever happened to the Picture that was displayed at the MET-Where are the sculptures-At least I know BP likes Marley and Loves Architecture. At least I know he loves Ducati motorcycles-I know what movies he likes, I know what he thinks of the way he was raised. I don’t think JA is an empty-headed starlett (like some of these young girls runing around) but I see no advantage in focusing on materialistic and physical attributes while denying what’s inside.
Funny you said that. I seem to remember AJ for still not speaking to her father and not letting him see the kids for equally being "disloyal" to her. So in your own words, AJ also fits the mean and vindictive description! And pls don’t come up with the explaination that AJ’s father deserve it while Jen’s mother doesn’t etc, as that will be total BS. AJ’s father was merely stating the truth. # 106 | Square toesNo you got your facts wrong; Jon Voight did not simply say “my daughter is a spoiled brat” like Nancy Aniston. Her father was not there for her when she was growing up, her father was the one who left their mother and them to be with another woman. Her father admitted he regrets how he didn’t spend much time with his kids because he wanted to focus on his career. After all that he had the audacity to diss his daughter on national tv and humiliate her, he knows his silliness could end depriving her from ‘Maddox’, he tried to stop her from traveling when she first started her UN work. Who the hell is he to seek a ‘father’ role now when he abandoned her as a kid? Who gives him the right to criticize her publicly when his daughter never spoken badly about him and kept his dirty secrets under wrapped? She was more protective of him and pls don’t come up with the lame excuse “he couldn’t reach her in private so he sought public tv”, he could do that via her mother and brother who she adores but apparently her father was more concerned about his image as a father to the public so he humiliated her so the public knows he is a *good* father who is trying to help his daughter. Nancy Aniston was the one who raised her daughter when her dad left them for another woman, you don’t compare AJ to JA because one estranged from the parent who raised her while the other estranged from the parent who neglected her as a child and most of her adult life.
# 94 | Me | I don’t usually post on a Jen thread but here are my responses:I am not an aniston fan - her VF interview turned off my sympathy as well. I believe she was trying to manipulate me, obtain my sympathy. I have no doubt that her answers were not spontaneous. No one in their right minds go to an important interview such as VF without preparation. She had given plenty of thinking of the way she could spin her answers. She got her friends to do teh dirty work (Brad didn’t want a baby?? please). And I also believe she ALLOWED VF to go ahead to write the really nasty stuff about Angelina (the "blood vial wearing, do gooder etc..). Did this little diatribe throw any light on Jennifer’s sadness - whichh is what that interview was about? To the best of my knowledge, Angelina’s self mutilation in her youth didn’t have anything to do with jennifer’s pain? Could Angelina’s description be phrased in a less nasty way. Of course, it could have been and had Jen and Huvane strongly protested the inclusion of these nasty bits which were about another party whom Jennifer has PUBLICLY stated had NOTHING TO DO WITH HER BREAK UP WITH BRAD, they could have taken it out without changing the tone of the VF interview or anything Jen had to say about her marriage. Jen wanted to come out looking nice and clean but got others to do her dirty work. She wanted to hurt Brad and Angelina but got or allowed others to do it instead. Sorry,but I cannot respect her. At least Hilary Swank did her own dirty work. "I need to say that I CRINGE at some of the posts."me too. I too cringe at the "Angelina is a homewrecker" and "Brad is a cheat" comments. None of which are proven or confirmed by Jennifer and Courtney in the infamous VF interview of subsequent interviews. Why are people so quick to judge a situation which they know nothing about. I don’t judge Jennifer based on what happened in the triangle. I judged her based on how she would NOT DO her own dirty work in the VF interview and how I perceive she wanted to MANIPULATE PUBLIC SYMPATHY for her. And yes she did so want to manipulate public sympathy for her, just like hilary swank did. Why else would YOU go public with your dirty linen -telling MILLIONS OF STRANGERS about this stuff. I DON’T LIKE BEING MANIPULATED so blatantly by anyone. To me, Her actions in the VF interview are vindictive and spiteful. Yes she was hurt so she hurt back. Who can blame her?? Well, I can because she TOOK those actions." JA is 37… life is not over. She can have a child now if she wants and she can adopt as well. But think about what all the AJ fans would say about that?? "If Jen wants children and has them great. I personally believe her mother damaged her and having children can be an immensely healing experience for her."ANother thing, calling someone barren is one of the cruelest insults I have ever heard." It is cruel but NOT THE CRUELEST thing people have said about the parties in this triangle. Death wishes to the BAMZS. Calling Zahara an ugly monkey. Saying things like, well, Z and Maddox won’t be loved anymore. Wishing that Brad and Angelina will break up (come on, think about the children), must be equally cruel and in my opinion, more cruel because innocent children are involved. To even write down these things is to wish for them to happen. That they may not happen is not the point. Would it make YOU happy if the children, become orphans or little Z and M are less loved then Shiloh. Isn’t that just nasty??"You have to believe that not having kids with her husband was the right thing to do if she didn’t have the proper amount of time to invest in that endeavour… That is someone to respect, not the one who has 3 kids at home with 2 nannies to raise them and has made herself so busy that those kids will grow up neurotic… please!! "I so agree with the fact that no person should have children unless they are prepared to spend the time. That is not the issue I and other like me have with Jennifer. IF (and this is an IF), she didn’t want children and wanted to wait till her 3 or 4 movies after friends were done, that’s fine. All we aee saying is, IF Brad wanted children from DAY 1 and she didn’t, why should we keep asking BRAD to keep his life on hold for something which he clearly desired. Frankly, Brad and Jennifer did not want the SAME THING, - kids, at the same time. That’s OK but I don’t believe either party needs to wait and wait. It’s another thing if Jennifer couldn’t have children. But take it from a woman who has had to try IVF for mine, Jennifer did not really try to have children."Also, as far as AJ being such a humanitatian… the only time she needs to promote any do gooding is when she is doing it on behalf of the UN… why do we need to know how much $$ they donate? What are you trying to erase? i bet JA has given a lot more that you think.. and even if she hasn’t. what rule book is it in that you have to donate your income.. no matter if it is $3000 a month OR $3000 an hour! "Charities like to publish the donations from wellknown people to encourage others to give. The PR releases came from the UN. I didn’t know she had contributed to a wild life fund in cambodia till she was awarded honorary citizenship, or that she had given to the harnas wildlife fund until harnas published it. As for her wanting to erase something - what is wrong with that? Speaking as a buddhist, we believe we gain merit by doing good works and giving donations. In our philosophy, repentance alone, may not be sufficient. Karmic debt requires action. And WE ALL HAVE KARMIC DEBT or we would be in a buddha state.Finally, I’ve written this before so I’m just going to do a cut a paste job:I just want to add that had AJ wanted to do humanitarian work for PR purposes only she would focus all her efforts on working on projects in the US. As we have been told plenty of times, there’s a lot to do right her in the US so why doesn’t she do it? There are over 40% of Americans who are inadequately insured for medical and health insurance. Then there’s the handicapped kids, the katrina victims, the American Indians stuck on reservations, the orphans etc. If she were to throw the sort of energy into thos issues in the US, I’m sure she’ll get plenty of publicity. Plenty of benefit concerts to organise, plenty of photo opportunities to play in FRONT OF THE PAPS.What she has done is in fact the opposite. She has chosen to try and highlight those who are forgotten. Sierra Leone, Darfur (I mean, its not exactly in the news is it until the last couple of weeks), Bosnia, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Many of the places she visited were actually dangerous and NOT ONE OF THE PAPPARAZI WERE PRESENT. So, for someone who is supposedly a brilliant media manipulator, she’s chosen a lot of hard work with doubtful returns to focus her energies to generate good PR for herself.And do you know why the PAPS were not present in Sierra Leone and Darfur and other places?? FOR 2 REASONS:1) because NO ONE IS ACTUALLY THAT interested in reading about Darfur and Sierra Leone so, Paps don’t want to cover those stories so BANG, there goes the Photo Opportunity right?? and2) Because there is always the risk of being kidnapped, of being killed. Even that pseudologist, Laura what her name acknowledges that those would be dangerous places. Do you think the paps followed George Clooney and his father to Darfur recently? I’m sure there would have been plenty of Photo opportunities but nope, I guess it would have been better if Clooney and his Dad just attended a demonstration and a benefit dinner about Darfur in the Washington DC eh???
I am a Jolie -Pitt fan. A BIG THANK YOU for JA. Call it destiny or fate. BP is now a new person with a greater vision in life. Mad, Zahara, Shiloh and Angelina are now in the loving care of your EX.THANX AGAIN> …. …
# 174 | To "To sad"Very good post. Very touching.
Hi, I have read where someone say wouldn’t Jen have said if they cheated. I don’t think so because that make her look worse and to get evidence for a divorce not look good either, plus California is community proprty law. I think Vanity Far report was fine why should she care about writer’s comment on Angelina, not her responibility. It was wide secret in HW on Mr Smith set what was going on my cousin was a PA. Still she said what she was going to try to believe not what heart told her.
Check out this AJ and JLM video kissinghttp://www.lulop.com/tag.php/Events/paternityand looking at the cameras
#181 human:I read Nancy Aniston’s 2 books, and I honestly don’t know what JA is upset about. Her mother obviously loves and cherishes her. Her criticisms are very minor…more like observations, and certainly nothing like Jon Voights tearful character assasination of his daughter. It will all even out in the end. It always does. My prediction? JA will be diagnosed with cancer due to her excessive smoking and only that will reconcile her with her mother. We all only have one mother, and no matter what JA is fantasizing about, it certainly isn’t Jane Pitt or Courtney Cox. I think JA has serious emotional problems left over from her father’s abandomnent. Too bad it is her mother she punishes.
Perry, do you know JA? been invited to her house for coffee? How can you talk about someone getting cancer…what a horrible thing to say..you also don’t have any idea what kind of relationship Jen had with her mother…and have no right to comment on her emotional state, unless you are her therapist, are you? I wish the very best for Jen, and hope she can have a relationship with her mom soon..I am a fan of hers and wish her well.
Okay, if anyone has any doubts about who is doing all the hating, head on over to the new thread. There isn’t a single negative comment on there, proving that it isn’t JA fans who are so rabidly virulent. It would be ever so lovely if the AJBP fans would offer the same respect and just stay out of it the next time JA pics are filed. How you can so loathe someone you don’t even remotely know says so much about you… Like I said before, take the time you spend spewing negativity online and give it to those less fortunate than you. Emulate what you think the people you so idolize are doing and go help other people rather than spilling venom. It sure isn’t what the world needs right now.
Her mom should not have written a book about her. period. no matter what side you come down on, that is just wrong.
#186 me,That video was from Jan 2004,almost 2 years ago.Some of the tabloids have been LYING about the date.
188 I didn’t say I hope or wish JA to get cancer, I am just predicting what will happen if she keeps up smoking. I predict this out of experience with other smoking friends. They have all ended up diagnosed with either breast, lung or throat/mouth cancer (and who is terribly deformed as a result of the many surgeries at age 50,,,which cannot be fixed by plastic surgery as there is not enough of her face left…she also has lost her tongue and can’t eat or drink anymore as she might choke). Anyway, maybe JA’s mom deserves her fate. If she does she must be evil. I haven’t read anything to support this, so I think the estrangement is simply a result of JA’s emotional fragility. JA interests just like people who win $50,000, 000 lotteries and blow it. I find it astounding to know people can be that stupid, weak, or simply believe their luck will somehow continue to defy gravity. Maybe I should be her therapist.
#191 I meant over 2 years ago.
Oh…and my friend with no face below her nose? She smoked to stay thin…guess what. Well, now she is very thin. She is also deformed and suicidal. We should all watch what we wish for. We will probably get it.
I’m not sure what’s your point. JA probably has many emotional problems, as many or most of us do, but I don’t think we should be judged for them. She does smoke a lot, and she also said she was trying to quit. I don’t think someone who smokes is ignorant about the consequences of it and the reason for doing it isn’t about being stupid. My father died from a stroke and one of the reasons for that was his smoking, but I wouldn’t call him stupid for that and I wouldn’t have respected him less.Other personal issues like not talking to a parent should’t be used to judge someone either, and there’s no point in comparing them to other people’s problems, as much similar as they can be. JA’s issues with her mother must be as serious to her as to AJ are her own issues with her father. The parameter you’re looking in order to determine whose problems are more reasonable doesn’t exist. Each of us have our own particular problems and we deal with them our own way. Having friends, feeling devastated about ending an important relationship, or smoking, doesn’t make a person weak or stupid, or inferior to others, that’s just what makes them an individual, unique and important as any other.Also, the fact that Jen doesn’t talk about her artistic or cultural interests in an interview isn’t enough to call her materialistic. I think there are many people in this thread who are too judgemental and assume anything about anyone just to prove a point, and the bottom line is that they all end up just being mean and hurtful.I already said it and I’ll say it again.. No one knows what happened between Brad and Jen, or what their lives were like, or what kind of people they are, even if you are their biggest fans. You can like one of them more than the other, but you can’t forget they’re human beings, they’re not just people who get paid for entertaining you.
sabi…I don’t have a "point" only observations, and, like you I have formed opinions. Unlike you, I don’t admire JA, but I also don’t pity her (too many other people in terrible circumstances get that) . I do find her strange and ungrateful for the fact that her life is easier than 99% of her fellow human beings. She is wealthy, healthy, not deformed, has her family living…etc. Yet it dosen’t seem enough. She seems to need and expect more without it seems investing herself in anything other than herself. I believe what goes around comes around. She rejected her mother, and Brad rejected her. What is the difference? In neither case do we know the details. Lets just assume there are good reasons and all parties are guilty. Are you willing to agree that her tratement of her Mother is just like Brad ’s treatment of her. Or do you have inside information?
Perry: No, I do not have inside information, but I think we have different perspectives of life and I’m not sure if discussing this makes sense. You can compare what Jen did to her mother with what Brad did to her, but I don’t believe that’s what she deserved. Maybe what goes around comes around, or "what you give is what you get", but this karma thing can get a little extreme at some point, and with that logic you can easily justify anything that you or that others do to you, and I don’t think that’s how things work. If I think about my own experience, I don’t know if I can say that every bad thing that happened to me happened for a reason, or if that was the way "something" was coming around to me. In Jen’s case, none of us knows, but we can’t say that Jen was the one doing this to her mother if it goes both ways. I certainly don’t think all of us deserve what we get.And about what you said that she has an easier life than many people for being whealthy, healthy, etc., I agree.. there are people who have much harder lives, and there are those who don’t appreciate what they have, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t take our own problems seriously or be affected by them just because there are more serious things going on in the world.This argument could go on forever so I think we better respect each other’s opinion, as you said, and that’s the end of it.
Sabi I also believe in the statement "From much is given, much is expected". She is in a position to help so many less fortunate people. She rich in every aspect, yet poor in spirit. I don’t pity her, but I do find her pitiful.
Sabi: Sorry…I meant to say…From those who much is given, much is expected". I don’t know why you think this isn’t worth discussing. It isn’t about convincing and being right or wrong. Each of us is just expressing our views. Do either of us know the details of these peoples lives? Of course not. There are celebrities with equal or even more good fortune than JA that I admire. Of course everyone has the right to deal with there own problems as they see fit, as long as they do it privately. I just wonder why we hear when Jane Pitt does/does not call Jennifer, and what the conversation is about, and when they go to lunch, but we don’t hear about JA talking to her own mother and what the conversation is about, and we don’t see pictures of her having lunch with her own family. I believe she has used her PR machine inappropriately. I am sorry she is hurt. We have all been there, but we all go on with our lives without discussing it publicly.
Sabi: My last observation, it you are still there. I am 40 years old with 3 kids ( a woman) and I just can’t relate to JA. My 13 year old daughter does. I find that interesting, given JA and I are much closer in age, and you would think have a more shared view of the world given we have grown up at the same time, and her friends (CC, Sheryl Crow etc) are my age. I do relate to them. So why not JA? Toodles.
Pages: « 1 … 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!