Gwyneth Paltrow: FLOATING HAND!!

Tue, 08 August 2006 at 12:00 am

Gwyneth Paltrow takes next month’s cover of Harper’s Bazaar, the Fall Fashion September 2006 issue. But it seems these pictures are incomplete… just look at Gwyneth’s dangling/floating hand! The touch-up artists seem to be in the middle of Photoshop-ing the final product, so I wonder what the final prints will look like. Were they Photoshop-ing her arm in, or Photoshop-ing her hand out? One more cover possibility in the gallery!

Gwyneth Hand gwyneth-paltrow-harpers-bazaar-01

Gwyneth Hand gwyneth-paltrow-harpers-bazaar-02

Gwyneth Hand gwyneth-paltrow-harpers-bazaar-03

Gwyneth Hand gwyneth-paltrow-harpers-bazaar-04

Posted to: Gwyneth Paltrow
Related posts:

18 Comments

# 1

msguidedmama @ 08/08/2006 at 4:05 pm

looks like they are shaving quite a bit of fabric off the front to make her look thinner….which is insane, she is already just perfectly shaped!

# 2

Lena @ 08/08/2006 at 4:15 pm

FUG

# 3

ED @ 08/08/2006 at 4:45 pm

OMG! They’ve been exposed! Scandalous! I remember when she was just as thin as Keira Knightley and was so flat chested. She used to be a walking clothes hanger, but now she looks healthy.

# 4

Rachel @ 08/08/2006 at 4:54 pm

Looks like they have "helped" her out in the chest area too. Can’t believe what you see can you?

# 5

lea @ 08/08/2006 at 4:58 pm

the 3rd picture from 1st row looks extremely heavily photoshopped to flattened that tummy . her right hand or rather right elbow look strange in that picture

# 6

angelah @ 08/08/2006 at 5:49 pm

LoL @ the floating hand!

# 7

k @ 08/08/2006 at 5:58 pm

why can’t she smile like a normal person? Just a nice smile instead of a snotty, smug smirk. uck!!

# 8

josiekate @ 08/08/2006 at 6:18 pm

I don’t think they gave her help in the chest area. Not sure when this cover was taken but she was probably pregnant or nursing, both of which increase the ol’ bustline.

# 9

Lauren @ 08/08/2006 at 6:23 pm

Yup - they’re making her thinner. It’s a sad world. I think it is safe to say that 100% of all cover pictures are digitally fixed.

# 10

GwynethLooksGood @ 08/08/2006 at 7:05 pm

As Gwyneth gets older and matures, I am starting to like her more and more. There’s a humbleness to her. And she is aging gracefully, might I add. I never use to think she was pretty at all and didn’t know what guys saw in her. But I now think she looks very pretty. She looks very good.But here in this photo with the cut off arm/hand, it looks like they were trying to photoshop her tummy. How fake! And the third photo…. you KNOW that is SO fake. I wonder what she said in the interview in this magazine. What’s she up to? Her husband’s ugly though. I did fall in love with one of his first songs though. I think it was called ‘trouble’ or something like that. And Apple, despite the genetic makeup of her parents (Gwyneth’s face and her husband’s face… uh, no, I would have never put them together), Apple looks like an angel. Just a cutie pie. I bet you Apple’s younger brother is going to grow up to be the ugly one, like Gwyneth’s brother.

# 11

suri @ 08/08/2006 at 9:37 pm

can’t stand this *****…

# 12

Cathryn K. @ 08/09/2006 at 7:48 am

Humbleness? From Gwen? Seriously?

# 13

Monica @ 08/09/2006 at 10:23 am

Ok, so seriously, I’m a graphic designer. 100% of all the mag covers, catalog models, advertisements, TV commericals…everything in print is airbrushed! I work for a ballet/dance supply co. and they have me make 90 lb. BALLERINA’S look skinnier–because honestly it’s the way the market wants to see them…it makes sales believe it or not.

# 14

msguidedmama @ 08/09/2006 at 10:46 am

she is nursing, they didn’t increase her breasts, her baby did…

# 15

... @ 08/09/2006 at 1:27 pm

She has all but formally denounced the U.S. in the media. Send her back to the U.K. if she likes it so much better than the country in which she was born!

# 16

Bon-Bons in Bath @ 08/09/2006 at 1:28 pm

hahaha…that’s hilarious!

# 17

Deborah @ 08/09/2006 at 3:13 pm

Isnt this the same mag that photoshopped Britney not so long ago?? Why are we all so surprised that they did it again? pft..shouldve left them like they are and only taken away blemishes and stuff….

# 18

ya ya @ 08/09/2006 at 3:43 pm

====== I think that they should give the magazine covers back to regular models. I know it’s all to promote the actors, especially when one of their movies or cd’s is coming out, but it’s like they are everywhere! Let the models have that back. ======== You can’t tell what’s real in photos anymore. =========Terry Hatcher was on some cover a while back, and you could tell that they photoshopped that ***t to death! She looked worse than in other photos! ===== Her face looked like silly putty! ===I bet she was pissed off!

Comment and Share!