Baby Suri Pictures

Baby Suri Pictures

X17online has the very first baby Suri pictures!!!!  New mom Katie Holmes is seen gazing out of fiance Tom Cruise’s Beverly Hills mansion… surprisingly with the bay window curtains not drawn.  Suri Cruise, 4 months, looks to be just wearing a diaper.  More pictures in the gallery!

As reported yesterday, Vanity Fair magazine will supposedly publish the first official photos of Suri Cruise in an upcoming issue this fall. Celebrities that have seen baby Suri up close and personal (and lived to tell the tale) include Penelope Cruz, Jada Pinkett Smith, and Leah Remini.  They all described Suri as "beautiful."

UPDATE :: Check out this link if you’re looking for the baby Suri Cruise pictures from Vanity Fair.

Baby Suri baby-suri-pictures-01
Baby Suri baby-suri-pictures-02
Baby Suri baby-suri-pictures-03
Baby Suri baby-suri-pictures-04
Baby Suri baby-suri-pictures-05
Baby Suri baby-suri-pictures-06


Posted to: Celebrity Babies, Katie Holmes, Suri Cruise, Tom Cruise
Related posts:

128 Comments

# 1

I’ll belive it when I see the baby in the flesh…

# 2
What the hell @ 08/10/2006 at 12:42 pm

Where is the baby?

# 4

I have to agree with stef. Once I see Suri in the flesh, up close w/ mom and dad, I’ll believe it then.

# 5

It looks more like a window than a baby…. :)

# 6
Sarah-Jean @ 08/10/2006 at 12:46 pm

Oh that’s ridiculous…

# 7

Ugh, I got the shivers looking at this picture. It is very Omen-esque…like the scary nanny and the mansion. So very scary.

# 8

It looks too big to be a baby…it’s probably Tom wearing diapers. It is truly scary as mentioned in other comments…I think when I do see the baby I will still never belive it is truly the couple’s real child. :(

# 9

am i the onlyone who finds it kinda wrong that they peeked into their windows with a telephoto lens?sure i want to see thekid,but this makes me feel kinda weird.

UberGoober @ 08/10/2006 at 1:02 pm

Katie says, "Let me out, you ********!"But I do see what looks like a baby wearing a diaper.

Sarah-Jean @ 08/10/2006 at 1:19 pm

Looks like it’s a baby… in a white blankey.Either that or it’s the stunt baby…I suppose if they fly around in the air long enough, they are bound to get a picture sooner or later.Watch Tomkat close all the curtains now.

Marcheline @ 08/10/2006 at 1:35 pm

Um, why are they showing an enlargement of the window NEXT TO the window that Katie is standing in front of? Are we supposed to believe that Suri is standing by herself in front of the other window?Come on. peeps - these are just pics of the front of a house. There is no baby in any of these pics.Suckered again…….. now give it three more minutes before the photos are removed from the site because they’re "too personal"…. like they did with all the Angelina/Shiloh pics….

This looks so set up. Suri Looks really big. Why doesn’t she have clothes on? Is that some scientology thing?

this baby looks too big to be 4 months!! katie looks scarey looking out the window. i got chills, they’re multiplying!

Oh please!!Where is the baby??!!!!hahahahhaoO

The "baby" is on the bed, and some babies are quite big at 4 months, with long arms/legs, Katies has long arms/legs so maybe she’s taking after her….although the wait could have been until the adoption went through. Who knows..why do we care?

The baby is in the first picture getting her diaper changed….and so what if the baby looks big, maybe she’s extrememly healthy.I also think that this is kind of wrong, to have someone looking in the window, to take pictures, that is a violation of privacy.

I’d feel bad that we were peeking into their house if the whole thing didn’t scream "STAGED!!!!"I hope Katie is planning her escape."Tom Cruise in diapers" That’s genius! Too Funny!!

UberGoober @ 08/10/2006 at 2:25 pm

My friend’s baby is 10 months, 28" tall and 18 pounds. My baby is 3 months old, 23" tall and 15 pounds.Don’t make me cry by saying Suri couldn’t POSSIBLY be that big already- my guy’s a Sumo! :)

lookwhaticando @ 08/10/2006 at 2:29 pm

Ugh, I got the shivers looking at this picture. It is very Omen-esque…like the scary nanny and the mansion. So very scary. # 7 | MMM ===================ITA, the pic is very spooky

your right-this screams"staged!"

The both the picture and the whole Suri thing is creepy.

WHO CARES!?? Enough with these two. Yes, I’m one of those ‘I’ll believe it when it see it’, and then, I might still NOT believe it.

I can’t stand Tom or Katie, but I think the paps are going too far. I’d be pissed if they were taking pictures of people in my damn house! Disgusting. What a culture we live in.

HeyBabyHeyBabyHey @ 08/10/2006 at 3:01 pm

Looks like a scene out of a horror movie. Woman gazes out of window of large country manor house as child of satsn lulls behind her in crib plottin end of the world. Whatever! So tired of Tom, Katie (Kate) and even the child that they could show up at my door and I wouldn’t care. TC so jumped the shark about 15 years ago right before Days of Thunder.

YOU REALLY CAN’T SEE THE BABY?!?!?!?!?!?! :)

umm. here’s my take on it: tom cruise is sterile, katie holmes is being paid to marry him and go along with the lie that they made a baby together. in reality it was a fake pregnancy and the baby was just adopted. that’s why her parents took so long to visit. they were mad at her for being so money-hungry. the end.

umm. here’s my take on it: tom cruise is sterile, katie holmes is being paid to marry him and go along with the lie that they made a baby together. in reality it was a fake pregnancy and the baby was just adopted. that’s why her parents took so long to visit. they were mad at her for being so money-hungry. the end.

i think katie is trying to spot the helicopter.wellthe baby (actually the whole pic) looks way to grany to see anything, so vanity fair still got their scoop.however i think it’s wrong to take these kind of pics, even though i can’t bring myself to not look at them.still i feel kinda bad for them.

Katie is locked up in the tower!!! help her!

redonkulous @ 08/10/2006 at 4:00 pm

Uh, that looks like a 2 year old…and something is DEIFINTELY rotten in Denmark. I am so over Tom "Crazy Pants" Cruise.

redonkulous @ 08/10/2006 at 4:01 pm

Uh, that looks like a 2 year old. I am so over Tom "Crazy Pants" Cruise.

Miss Orleans @ 08/10/2006 at 4:29 pm

Poor Katie. She looks like the princess trapped in the tower. Chris Klein should buy himself a white horse to rescue Katie and Suri from the Evil Tomster Cruise

You all might try looking on x17online they may have more…..always check x17 they rock.

PennyCruz @ 08/10/2006 at 4:31 pm

She’s the most beautiful baby ever!…….that’s what I’m supposed to type…..right??? Tom….are you watching me? HELP ME! Tom’s not looking at the computer right now….PLEASE HELP ME!

dragonfly @ 08/10/2006 at 4:54 pm

Tom is sterile. That’s why he and Mimi Rodgers got divorced, right? Mimi wanted children, and Tom was in his late twenties, Mimi was already in her early-mid thirties, and her clock was ticking, so the amicably spilt when they found out his sperm count was so low it was practically underground. It was all swept under the rug because Tom was coming to the height of his popularity, and there were alot of people banking on him who stood to lose alot of money if it got out that the Top Gun was actually shooting blanks. He and Nic adopted, because he didn’t have the squiggly wigglies to impregnate her.I am on the band wagon with the theory that Katie did indeed have a baby, but it is on "his" in the sense that he paid for the insemination. That kid is not his genetic offspring. It is all PR to prove how "manly" he is. An elaboate show orchestrated by Scientology because they fear losing one of their biggest cash cows as his screws slowly work themselves loose. The guy has all the signs of mental illness. He’s paranoid, delusional, and obsessive-compulsive. He’s also over.

I can’t see anything, just looks like a blur

maybe it’s a doll.

it´s a freakin doll my friends….

Is Katie aware that IF it is a real baby, Suri can easily fall off the bed? She should better watch her than look outta the window…….

Could be anything - a doll???

Female President @ 08/10/2006 at 5:43 pm

PEOPLE ARE SO DUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Of course there is a Suri!!!!!!!!!Did you ever think that maybe they just don’t want to share the baby with the press?If you don’t think there is a Suri, then answer these questions:1) The many photos of her VERY pregnant stomach in the flesh?2) Why would all these celebs with credibility LIE and say there is a baby?3) Tom Cruise is VERY famous - do you think he is that stupid that he would fake a baby that everyone would find out about anyway?4) How do you think he is faking the baby - you think they are going to use someone else’s baby and say it is there’s?5) If so, then explain Katie Holmes’ pregancy!!Just because he does not want to share the baby pics with the world and Paps does not mean there is no baby.6) Tom is very VERY rich. If he wanted to pull this off, he could of just had her fertilized with someone’s sperm and have the baby look like her or something. he is too rich to pull such a dumb scam. Suri is alive and well and his baby. He just wants to share the photos when the right price is offered.Or it is a publicity stunt to keep his names in the papers but the baby is real and it is his.There are NO good arguments against it.

Female President @ 08/10/2006 at 5:43 pm

PEOPLE ARE SO DUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Of course there is a Suri!!!!!!!!!Did you ever think that maybe they just don’t want to share the baby with the press?If you don’t think there is a Suri, then answer these questions:1) The many photos of her VERY pregnant stomach in the flesh?2) Why would all these celebs with credibility LIE and say there is a baby?3) Tom Cruise is VERY famous - do you think he is that stupid that he would fake a baby that everyone would find out about anyway?4) How do you think he is faking the baby - you think they are going to use someone else’s baby and say it is there’s?5) If so, then explain Katie Holmes’ pregancy!!Just because he does not want to share the baby pics with the world and Paps does not mean there is no baby.6) Tom is very VERY rich. If he wanted to pull this off, he could of just had her fertilized with someone’s sperm and have the baby look like her or something. he is too rich to pull such a dumb scam. Suri is alive and well and his baby. He just wants to share the photos when the right price is offered.Or it is a publicity stunt to keep his names in the papers but the baby is real and it is his.There are NO good arguments against it.

dragonfly @ 08/10/2006 at 5:46 pm

I think the baby is real, and Katie did give birth. I just don’t think she is his genetic offspring.

those are scary pictures. i wish i could see a better picture but at least its some proof for now. i bet it is tom in diapers. and katie should start planning her escape. she looks really sad.

I couldn’t care less about this baby; her father is a total crackpot and her mother is brainwashed, If anything, you should feel sorry for her. I mean seriously, is there any way she can avoid Scientology?

I completely agree with most of these comments, this is going too far. There comes a point when invasion of privacy, stalking, trespassing, and many other things come into order with these pictures. (They are releasing a family picture, by the way, it says on x17’s site. Vanity Fair, I believe?)Anyhow, this is very wrong, in so many ways. Not only on the obvious level of the invasion of privacy, but also in the pure fact of people actually thinking and saying things such as, ‘they deserve it!’ to justify these acts. All they did and are doing, is trying to raise their child as they feel is the proper way to do so, as any of our parents have done. Just because people are so curious and unable to accept that perhaps not everything in a ’star’s life should be public, it drives them to do unacceptable acts and justify it to themselves in meaningless ways. As far as Katie feeling trapped and the symbolism in this picture, I agree, however I cannot be so sure it is Tom or Scientology as much as the press and pressure to ‘do what everyone else is doing.’ I can’t even imagine not being able to take my child for a walk, or play with them outside, or even be able to get a little bit of sunshine by opening a window without someone hovering over my house with a helicopter and a telephoto lens ready to ruin and endanger everything I believe in.It’s just wrong, and I don’t think any price of fame should be so personal, and so threatening. Do you realize that a lot of the stars now fear for their safety, their reputation, even their lives can be at risk with how much the paparazzi are crossing the line? It has never been this bad, and if something isn’t done about it soon I fear it is going to get a lot worse. Something should be done, and I really feel that this crossed way to many lines to even mention.

Alright now, finally they’re here - you can’t see anything, but you can recognise that there at least IS a baby.. I won’t post another hate comment like some others do, I’m not too fond of Katie’s weird relationship with Tom either but - oh my gosh, I LOVE this huge window and the fact that their baby sleeps there, it looks lovely!

Gonna say something else, as I forgot it in my comment: The way these photos were taken is horrible indeed! Celebrities can’t even stand at their ******’ windows without being photographed! No miracle that Suri hasn’t seen the day of light yet - when they even take pictures of her when she’s IN the house!

Answering ‘Female President’’s questions:1. It’s called a pregnant belly prosthesis - used in movies all the time to make women look pregnant!!! Did you touch it? Can you prove it’s actual flesh? A prime example of how REAL a pregnant belly prothesis looks: http://www.oregoncoast.com/chimera/pregnant.htmlThe other side is that Katie may have been pregnant, but Cr-uise-azy isn’t the biological daddy.2. They’re all close friends of Cr-uise-azy and he is pretty powerful in Hollywood. Wouldn’t you lie for a close, powerful friend?3. Don’t think the baby is fake, but I bet it’s not Cr-uise-azy’s biological child4. Adoption!!! People adopt other people’s babies and say the child is ‘their own’ all the time! Hello!!!!5. See answer to # 36. If he’s actually infertile, he can’t use his own sperm! And using someone’s else’s says exactly what I say - she’s not biologically Cr-uise-azy’s baby.Either way, if that baby is not biologically Cr-uise-azy’s baby, then it’s a sham because they are leading the public to believe she’s biologically theirs.’Female President’, you have NOT proven your opinion to be truth any more than those of us who believe Suri is not Cr-uise-azy’s biological daughter or that she even exists.

Female President @ 08/10/2006 at 7:32 pm

If he is infertile and she was inseminated by a sperm donor - that is Tom’s business. Why should he tell the world?I know plenty of people who have kids this way and who adopt kids and don’t tell anyone!It is a private matter. It is not lying.

I didn’t read all comments, just the last two and I can only say: Stop thinking about this **** that long! Just because there haven’t been any photos around yet Katie wasn’t even pregnant at all, Tom isn’t the biological father or the kid is somehow ugly or what?? That’s absolutely crazy, and I feel sorry for everyone like Aisling who invent crazy, weird stuff in their heads. That’s complete bullshit, there haven’t been any pictures of Tom’s adopted kids at the beginning either, he just obviously didn’t want it - look at all the Scientology rules, people aren’t even allowed to do baby talk in Suri’s presence, so why should the public be allowed to even SEE her? Just forget about this baby and live your own life! You’ll see the pictures when they’re released, end of story!!

congrats! to Katie and Tom, Jesus who cares if they choose to be diffrent, everyone is diffrent and that does not make you a weird or freak. They just want to experience this special blessing without everyone looking and judging. They have done nothing worng, 90% of hollywood are more troubled, addicts, or whores, those are the once that should be criticized, I yet to see why all the bashing!

Kudos to Ana!!! =D

I agree with Ana - I’m not fond of Scientology and all that crap, but it’s their choice and it’s no-one else’s business!

Fake…its a prop. Plus, why would you leave a baby just laying on a bed alone? Its staged and fake?!?!

I know from a very good source, who works inside the house, that there IS a baby, who was adopted, and that Katie signed a contract to be his "escort" or something. Nicole Kidman had one too, but hers was for ten years. Exactly how long they stayed together. The baby is not theirs biologically, and Tom Cruise is GAY! This from someone who works veeeerrrrry close to them.

I have a good friend who lives in Atlanta, he’s an attorney, and he is gay. He’s from a very wealthy family, and he partied in the 80’s with alot of the "beautiful people" in and around the entertainment industry. He does not have AIDS, but seriously, from some of his antics, I am surprised he doesn’t….anyhoo, he swears, SWEARS that he knows people who have been with Tom, and that he is ***** as a football bat. Personally, I don’t get a gay vibe off Tom, he doesn’t set off my gay-dar, but I do get a major Napoleonic Complex thing just oozing out of him.

It’s a scene from Amityville Horror meets Rosemary’s Baby.

# 57 | Anonymous , I totally agree with you. I know an insider, as well, who swears that Tom is gay, that he knows of assorted men and "rent boys" that have been brought in for Tom (he’s that close to the situation) and that the baby Nicole miscarried was her driver’s (not Ewan MacGregor’s) and Tom was PISSED that she violated her contract, just shy of its 10-year stipulation…that’s why he TRIED to get away with not giving her the pay-off on their business contract sham of a marriage. People have been PAID to keep their mouths shut; others have been PAID to lie their asses off! Tom has NOT fathered any biological child because he has not had sex with any of his so-called wives…they have ALL been under contract in their "marriages" to pose as a real wife and have been paid well and signed papers that they cannot disclose ANY information on Tom, their relationship or his involvement with the Church of $. So, you will NOT be hearing any negative or contradictory comments from Nicole. He even bugged her house after they split. There is a baby, but it was born back in December. That is the reason Katie’s belly has fluctuated so much in size…yes, she was pregnant, but she was pregnant long before it was announced. They cannot show the baby at this time, because the baby is too big to be passed off as a four-month-old, because it is, in fact, eight months old. The baby IS NOT TOM’S! As far as the paps go, this is an invasion of privacy. I don’t know if that picture is really Suri, yet. But Suri is not a four-month-old baby! Tom may release photos when she gets large enough to "fudge" her age, but right now, she could NOT pass for a four-month-old. End of story.

i to think it is wrong to peeking in her widow if she wanted her baby to be seen she would have broght her out a long time ago people leave this people alone!!!!!!!!!1

Compare the size of the baby to the size of Katie in the pic….that is one HUGE baby?? Either that or its totally a photoshop job. Good on Tom and Katie for keeping Suri out of the limelight, its their choice, respect it or piss off. So what if they jumped up and down on couches and Tom carried on like a teenage twit when he fell for Katie? He wasnt hurting anyone was he? Katie was visibly thrilled and you could see she loved him back. They knew they werent hurting anything or each other by doing this….they have ahad a child and they have enought respect to shelter that child from the world which - contrary to what most conspiracy theories claim - shows a lot of maturity AND IT IS THEIR CHOICE NOT YOURS!!!!! I dont have a love or hate thing going for them, but come on everyone!! If they shoved Suri in to the limelight there would have been criticism all round, they are sheltering her and they still get picked on?If you dont like the way someone chooses to raise their child, unless you have PROOF that they are doing something illegal, get a life and dont look at pics and posts about them! How simple is that??

celebitchy @ 08/11/2006 at 6:15 am

You guys, your comments are excellent and I’ve reprinted many of them on my celebrity website. If you see your comment listed and would like me to remove it, just e-mail me from my contact info on my site, or comment on this post about it:http://www.celebitchy.com/2006/08/favorite_comments_about_the_su.html

I think Suri is very real people, given how rich Tom is, makes total sense to have a child or two. Tom’s not lying, these days, you can go public if you are gay, you can go public if you are sterile!! Even if after Tom annouses he can’t have children, got left out by producers for "manly" acting jobs, so he doesn’t play Ethan, he can still play stuff Jim Carrey or Robin Williams do. The guy’s enjoying his life, don’t make him shut all his draps. Why on earth do I have to show every one my baby girl!

LOOK AT THAT! That is SCARY , man! That photo of Kate like that with the baby in the background, my gosh, that is really, really weird and scary looking. Like the OMEN or something, I dunno. What’s that other old movie called, with young Mia Farrow in it, about having the devil’s child or something? ‘Rosemary’s Baby’?Where’s the light in the room? And why is it so shady? Don’t these celebs let in natural light into their nurseries?Do you think Katie purposely kept the curtains open for the papz to take photos as some sort of little retaliation against Tom? Because if this photog is sitting in a helicopter, it would be really loud, even from far away. Especially in a quiet neighborhood/ suburb.

Hi Dragonfly: All my gay men friends have told me that Tom is gay. I don’t give a horse wallop if he is gay, I just don’t like the guy. He’s so one dimensional in his acting — although I did like the last Samauri — but only for the Japanese cast. Gosh, I loved Ken Watanabe. Didn’t see any of his MI movies, though. As far as his ‘cult’ religion goes, like some people said, ‘it’s his choice’. If it makes him happy, fine. Just don’t try pushing it down people’s throats. Maybe the ‘elders’ told him to stay away from the anniversary celebration so they wouldn’t get ‘negative’ publicity. One day ‘little girl’ will wake up and realise that she’s married a poster on her wall, and life ain’t no fairy tale.

Hi Dragonfly: Didn’t Nicole miscarriage? At least, I think I read that in a mag — but then again, it was a ‘rag’ mag.

Why has the cat got a nappy on it ?

Hi Angelika: I so agree with you, but while people still buy the ‘rags’, there will be blood suckers out there trying to get pictures to sell. These men/women don’t care about anyone or anything, they are out there to get their pictures which sell for alot of money. This is why Angie and Brad were so smart. They worked with People. People got their scoop and Angie and Brand got their monies for their charities. Once you become a Hollywood thing, your life isn’t yours anymore. It’s a shame, but that is the way it is. I mean, you can’t pick your nose in public in fear that someone will take a picture and sell it to the Star with the caption, "bugger lady", or "bugger man". It’s horrible. I only buy one mag — which I don’t consider a ‘rag’ and that’s People. All the rest can be blown up for all I care.

Tom is infertile, like somebody already said, that is why he and his 1st wife Mimi Rogers split up. She wanted kids. And he and Nicole had to adopt. Nicole had a miscarriage just before she and Tom split up, Nicole cheated and that is how she became pregnant. Tom is not suri’s biological father. A sperm donor was used or else the baby was adopted.

How interesting that some of you say she was born in december. Why in the world would they do that? Why would they fake a pregnancy so long? They should have just come out and said what was going on, its like they are digging the hole much deeper. So….you so called insiders…..you should share more info!! What can I say, Im a sucker for gossip!!

I’m sure everything "will come out in the wash", as they use to say. You can’t hide to much in Hollywood. If it’s not Tom’s and it’s someone else’s, why wouldn’t he just tell the truth, unless it’s another ‘quirk’ thing from his religion. Strange, very strange.

This baby looks way too big to be a three-month-old baby.

This baby looks way too big to be a three-month-old baby.

I believe that there is a Suri. This picture is very creepy. To AmyV, it clearly said she’s a 4 month old. And also, it does not look to big to be a 4 month old. Although it kind of looks more like a monkey to me…Katepunzel, Katepunzel, let down your hair.

The close-up shots are complete fakes. The things you can do with Photoshop — but if you’re not REALLY good at it, it just looks weird or creepy.

Angelika, thanks for singling me out as being the one with ‘crazy, weird stuff’ in my head. I’m not crazy, just extremely skeptical. There is a difference. And guess what, we’re all entitled to our opinions and should be respected for them, no matter how ‘crazy’ and ‘weird’ you think they might be. I’ve never said anyone was wrong in thinking that Suri is Tom’s or Suri was real or whatever… I just don’t share the same opinion. And it’s doubtful I am in the minority.

katie looks too tall in this pic (IF it’s her). looks as though someone took a pic of the window and then pasted her on. also, on our left it is dark in the house and on the right there is light. doesn’t match up. reminds me of the movie Flowers in the Attic. spooky!!

Unless it’s a big sham and then how do you get yourself out of that???

Tanya Turner-Gate @ 08/11/2006 at 2:58 pm

Come on people, this man can’t and has never produced any children. He’s been married 3 times all of which have been arranged by the studios to act as a cover/beard. Did he and Mimi Rodgers ever produce any kids, and poor Nicole forced to adopt, to keep up his big lies. Just come out of the closet Tom…Lance Bass did. It won’t hurt your career, since there’s really nothing let of it any way. Come out and start a hole new career. And please free Katie!!!

Tanya: You are too funny!!

delicious_dysfunktion @ 08/11/2006 at 8:37 pm

I agree with you #60,its just like back in the day where studios payed gossip outlets to confirm that certain closeted actors were straight or had arranged marriages to make the public think they werent gay.Tom Cruise is,theres no other way.Besides him losing his bankability Co$ condemns homosexuality,so even if he wanted to come out of the closet theyd kick him out of the religion.When I think on it he’d be better off,Co$ is nothing but a cult made up by a deranged money hungry writer of bad science fiction.

If you copy and paste the picture, and zoom in on it, Suri’s face looks flat. It doesn’t look like a normal baby’s face, which tells me that it’s either a fake picture, or that something is indeed wrong with this baby and that’s why they have kept her out of the media. I agree with the fact that it doesn’t make sense how one couple can be so public with their sickening relationship-yet hide their child from the world. Very, VERY strange.OH, and the pictures are DEFINITELY creepy!

Julian Francis @ 08/11/2006 at 9:05 pm

Why don’t people look at these pictures before automatically commenting "uMm WhErE?"big baby for only 4 months..

I would like to see ‘proof’ of this ‘contract’ Nicole was in with Tom.

That pic IS a bit freaky. Looks like a baby there too.

You people are really funny, You can’t tell **** by looking at those pictures. Yet yaull could see katie by the window and 4month old baby. Hell yaull sound like bigger weirdos than Tom himself. And hell it gets better when you doctors confirm that Tom cant have children. Maybe Tom doesnt have children because his ladies didnt want any. Hollywood didnt use to have children, it just now got popular. Thats why you either have the young ones like britney or the old ones like Madona just now having children. So its Tom’s turn and nothing more. Weird People!

Baby exists. Not Tom’s. He is sterile. He used Ron Hubbard’s frozen sperm (Scientology founder) to impregnate Katie. Penelope cruz split because she was unwilling to do this.Only other people who know are Nicole and Mimi Rogers.He has proved to the word that he is virile, not gay and nota would-have-been homosexual priest.

wundersmack @ 08/12/2006 at 9:55 am

I agree with everything posted by #60… the baby was born in December, and that’s because Katie was already pregnant when she and Tom rush-rush-rushed through the fake relationship, engagement. They have staged this ruse so that Katie and Tom BOTH could save face. Think about it — he was actively searching for / "interviewing" potential beards/mates. Katie had a problem (unintentional pregnancy by some other dude), Tom had a problem (wanted to continue to fake his manliness in the interest of box office booty)… so they hooked up and this is the result. I have no doubt that Katie actually had a baby (just look at her now, barely recognizable and bloated), but there’s no way it’s Tom’s or that she had the kid on the published timelines.

The baby in the photo does look big - bigger in fact than my 10 month old niece. BUT that doesn’t make her not real OR not really 4 months old - my nephew was this big (of not bigger) when he was 4 months old.I don’t subscribe to all the conspiracy theories.Is it too hard to believe a couple could meet and fall pregnant and have a baby?And who cares if the baby has never been seen in public? That doesn’t mean she hasn’t been outside!!!The photos show Katie at the window, and a maid/nanny attending to Suri. Not unreasonable.As for people’s ’sources’ who know of contracts and adoptions and everyone being paid to keep quiet… well, for a big shot like Tom he’s not doing too well if these ’sources’ are talking… :)

seconds before katie jumps:LOOK SURI, IT’S ALL FOR YOU, IT’S ALL FOR YYOOUUUUUUU!!!!

That is just CREEPY!!!!

I believe Suri is real, I just think they have kept her hidden 1# because of Toms Scientology belief, that you shouldn’t expose the baby for a certain lenghth of time, or#2..hes trying to up the price he will get for the pics…I don’t know if this is a pic of the baby or not..and I do think he shouldn’t have hyped everyone up while Katie was pregnant, and then not show pics of the baby, he absolutely is a nut case…

Tanya: get your lies straight, you said Tom was married 3 times, I believe it was only 2 times, Mimi Rogers, and Nicole Kidman…And I don’t believe there was any contract for Nic to adopt kids as a cover for Tom being Gay,,,I actually am one of the few people who don’t believe he’s gay…there has never been a shred of evidence to prove that rumor…ever since he did Interview with a Vampire, the stories have been going around…Brad Pitt was in that movie, why didn’t anyone accuse him of being gay?

I must be blind, because I can’t see anything but blurr and fuzz!

# 95 | judi | Stories about Tom being gay have been around long before IWTV. Not saying they are true, just that they were out there.

# 95 | judi |and christian slater or antonio banderas were in the movie with brad and tom! i think that tom is a crazy man but not gay.

Razzmatazz @ 08/12/2006 at 5:02 pm

It is a creepy pic!! Katie looks so lonely. If there is one negative thing i remember X Nichol saying about Tomkat, it was on the Jay Leno show when she said " living with Tom was a very alienated life. My ears perked as I was surprised she even made the comment. The contracts TC has/had drawn up for his wives, maids,Nannies’ ,etc are signed and sealed in cement. A former Nanny who is/was/ writing a book on her past few clients was at one time Tomkat and Nicole’s Nanny . She said Tom’s contract had her so saddled in she really couldn’t admit she ever worked for the Family. Except for Nicole as she didn’t have one drawn up. I see poor Katie being very alone. I bet she would love to show Baby"Surie"? off. *if she was with someone else. Nichole K was a very busy women , A fantastic A-Lister actress so her time was always busy and yet she still felt alienated when at home ?? Katie was on the list of interviews for this career or position with Tomkat as well as Scarlett Johansson and other young actress’s . S.H. turned Tomkat down when he invited her for dinner at the scientology center where he was holding the interview, supposedly for a role in the M.I.3 movie. S.H. spoke out and said, why was this man who was old enough to be her father coming onto her??? When TC invited her into a fancy dining room where other aging scientologist were waiting to see/be introduced to TC’s choice of "baby oven" So she immediately had a weird feeling , She excused herself by telling TC that she had made other arrangements with her Mother. When it was Katie’s turn for her interview., She was missing for 17 days, not a phone call, NIL was heard from Katie. KH was an adult, Her friends and Family did know she was going for that interview, BUT there was much concern for Katie during that time . We will never know just how frantic the family and friends were as that was not in Katie’s nature. She was a happy loving down to earth young lady who was a communicator. She had regular days/ nights sharing her time with her friends, keeping in touch and seeing her Family. Apparently on the 17th day Katie came back for her belonging’s, a "new Katie" who had fallen madly in love with Tom Cruise Control. The contract for whatever ??? was already in the makings .Little did anyone know how fast Katie’s happy going life was about to change.

well if that is a baby then it looks normal baby size. my daughter was born te day before suri so IF that is suri then the baby looks like your average baby

Glamour Diva @ 08/13/2006 at 2:54 pm

LOL I know what’s going on with Baby Suri:http://sexandthesushi.blogspot.com/2006/07/news-droppingsmind-where-you-step.html

# 95 | judi - why the **** you have to bring up Brad Pitt’s name all the time… you are obsessed with him. Leave him alone and deal with the subject at hand. Do you always have to compare?

Lonely judi @ 08/13/2006 at 3:08 pm

Judi is an Aniston fan…what do you expect from a Faniston. Typical whiners just like their freaking idol…By the way, we heard she was engaged with GAY VINCE.

People people these things about the scientology religion having rules about showing their children is so Bullshit. John Travolta and his wife are scientologists and we saw pictures of their kids shortly after birth. Tom Cruise is just plain weird or even worse. Whats gonna be real funny is when Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban have ‘baby news’!! Katie Holmes will find out soon, if not already, what Nicole K. meant by being alienated living with Tom C. TC is gonna wind up being like Howard Hughes did: very rich and very nuts and very alone

come on guys, obviously it looks like suri is as big as katie’s entire torso, but don’t forget, scientologist four-month-olds are the size of regular five-year-olds. and can’t you just see the single tear in the proud mother’s eye? *gleam*

lillie belle @ 08/14/2006 at 11:26 am

are you people really buying into this nonsense or is it just a goof? tom and nicole didnt publicize their two children..why should he do so with this child? i can remember a time when clebs didnt want the public to see their child they hid them behind blankets..wanting to keep them out the limelight for as long as possible…….next!

Anonymous @ 08/14/2006 at 1:33 pm

sarah,F.Y.I.- I do believe the baby could have been "born" in December, because now that I remember correctly, the insider who saw the baby said Tom’s other two adopted children would be playing in the morning with the baby in the living room. I heard this in early July and thought it was odd that a baby was ‘playing’ with siblings at such a young age. If she was in fact born in December, then that would have made it a six-month old and would sound more reasonable.They can only cover all this for so long. And the look on Katie Holmes face on all the pictures since she met Tom Cruise is SCARY, and they progressively get worse. Right now she resembles a depressed mummy (no pun intended). What he’s doing to her should be illegal. It’s a form of purchasing a wife or slavery. Whatever attorneys would call it, it just sounds illegal. Tom Cruise must be the incarnation of SATAN. So much for selling your soul Katie…..

celeb watch @ 08/14/2006 at 6:11 pm

It is terrible that this company x17 would try to sell private photos taken through a window. There are laws in California protecting people especially a celebrity’s privacy in their home. Regis Navarre and his Agency X17 is pushing the limit on safe professional photography with their tactics. They drive unsafely, and will go to any length to get a photo so that they can profit from it. This is disgusting. A baby should be off limits, especially inside their own home.We hope Tom Cruise will go after Regis and his agency and win back his privacy. If you agree write or phone x17 and complain and tell them they are wrong and they should stop doing these bad things.Francois Regis Navarre1633 Amalfi DrivePacific Palisades CA 90272work 310-899-1803mobile 310-505-9733e mail: rnava17@aol.comregis@x17agency.com

I am going to call him and complain! I feel sorry for all the abuse some of these celebrities get from the paparazzi. They should grow up!

Terri - Lynn Lace @ 08/14/2006 at 9:38 pm

It is a creepy pic!! it looks like a scene from Nichole’s movie "The Others" and the baby looks way too big to be a 4 month-old baby. I think its a fake. but i give the press a "2 thumbs up" for trying. Nobody’s buying it! nice try though.

Terri Lacey @ 08/14/2006 at 9:38 pm

It is a creepy pic!! it looks like a scene from Nichole’s movie "The Others" and the baby looks way too big to be a 4 month-old baby. I think its a fake. but i give the press a "2 thumbs up" for trying. Nobody’s buying it! nice try though.

christina @ 08/15/2006 at 7:31 am

just before nicole and tom split she miscarried his child, there was a problem with nic not tom, thats why they had adopted.tom and katie maybe very happy and want to keep there daughter out the spotlight others celebs do this to but tom and kate went the wrong way about it, they had a very public romance and a very public pregnancy then they change there minds as soon as baby is here and keep her locked up, that is not the way to go about it if you want privacy!

Marcheline @ 08/15/2006 at 2:23 pm

The truth is, Suri is a Grey - an alien accidentally left behind the last time the mother ship came down to visit Tom. Suri is actually 3,000 years old, but since Greys don’t get much taller than a human infant, they can pass it off as a baby for a while. The reason we haven’t seen any actually discernable photographs of Suri is that every photographer that looks at it through a lens is instantly killed by the death rays shot from its eyes.In the language of the Greys, "Suri" means "career pump".- M

I’m emailing Regis….I think thats just wrong

I thought that was Michael Jackson in the window, with possibly Macaulay Culkin on the bed waering the diapers.

It is a scary and horrible picture. I would not have published it anywhere. It does not do justice to Tom and his family. Tom never did anyone wrong. Why would x17 publish such a horrible picture? Shame on them.

I agree with Natalie. It’s creepy to peek into someone’s window to try to get a glimpse of a stranger’s baby. Freaks.

Suri Cruise looks like actress Camilla Belle

crazyeedayzee @ 08/20/2006 at 5:18 pm

for those of you who say she looks too big–your’e right! suri was born 3 months before we THINK she was born. (the belly was a fake, folks). katie was knocked up while she began negotiating to be the new "mrs. cruise by contract". we will see the baby when it’s not so noticeable that the she’s too big for her age. in the meantime, she’s hidden in that creepy house with that creepy daddy of hers. poor katie, looking like a stepford wife, doesn’t know what she got herself into.!

I dont see no baby,and how low are some people to want money for pictures of a baby. I would never do that to my daughter. BRING OUT THE BABY TOM AND KATIE.

Gawd, some of these post are cracking me up, they are good. I totaly agree with Whisper and Anonymous. I remember the big People magazine spread (years ago) when Tom and Nic adopted, it was because he has such a low sperm count he cant reproduce. John Tavolta’s kids are never with them either, although I heard he had Turetts syndrome or something and therefore they keep him home. I do think Katie bite off more than she can chew. Katies dad being a lawyer, we should hear something out of this when they split..Tom is Bi-Polar big time….he just doesnt know it yet!

didnt anybody read the magazine a few years ago that when he was with nicole kidman they adopted because he was sterile? TELL ME SOMEBODY READ IT..

My old teacher is Katie’s god mother. Her old house and school is 10 minutes away from me. And my friend met her and said she is so weird. Why would she marry someone that old when she had someone like her old fiance? I would never change my religion for someone that old and digusting. It doesn’t even make sense!!

Who ever can get a picture before any are officially published will have a huge payday. I work in an industry where a client of mine mentioned how much his company would be willing to pay for a verified picture of Suri before any are published. It blew me away. journeyman38@safe-mail.net

This is such a low quality STALKERAZZI pic that I’m sorry I even looked at it.Having said that, here’s my take on the sitch.Tom has lost his mind, and is probably definitily gay. Remember Nicole nude in "Dead Calm"? That was a "boyish" figure. Before that, Mimi was more like a mother/mentor, and if I weren’t such a fan I would use the term "*** hag" (I’m really not trying to be mean, just a bit brutal in my honesty)Now to poor little Katie. Did she get preggers w/someone else, and Tom leapt at a lucky break to quell the rumors? Or was she truly smitten by her idol, and her mind overpowered by one with a higher "E-meter" and impregnated by means possibly nefarious? I’m leaning more to the first idea,with maybe a smidge of the second, because that explains why they’re hiding the baby. They want all the furor to die down so that when the baby is revealed no one will be thinking clearly enough to finagle a DNA sample from a puddle of drool left by a dropped binky or some such. Yes, be vigilant for your chance you stalkerazzi!Ahhhhaaahahahahahaaaaaaaaahaahaha(maniacal laughter seems the most appropriate response of all)

BathoryCarpathia @ 08/30/2006 at 9:49 am

That picture is awesome! Its so creepy, but I agree those idiots had no right spying on her through her window like that. Yes the baby looks a bit big, but just for reference. My baby was born right around the time Suri was supposedly born, and he passed the 16 lb mark at four months 1 week. He is now barely 5 months and weighs 16 and a half pounds. My baby is a big baby, and its possible their baby is as well.

wow she’s very cute ….

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.