Jennifer Aniston Eats Sushi Roku

Thank you again Clinqua for reinforcing C-2 and making me a hard-core Jennifer Aniston Fan. My opinion, JA added a lot to that movie and Vince seemed to think so, too. And if you think I can’ t find an critic who said Angie wasn’t much in the MAMS film, just give me a minute. LMAO.

Sarah, you give new meaning to the word hypocrit. Your pious sermon went in one ear and out the other. You don’t know the meaning of charity. If you did, you would not condone people calling others names based on tabloid lies. You played along just like the rest of the posters. If you have something better to do with your time, then by all means, go ahead. You are no better than anyone else that post on this board pro or con.

# 224 | ManistonISaHONo! Maniston would never have sex at age 13 or blow Brad on their first date or lie like a rug to keep herself in the headlines. Afterall she is Rachel Green and Rachel Green would never ever do such a thing. LMAO

What BAMZS fans will go through to defend these celebs. It’s just evil. BAMZS people believe in revenge and anger. I believe in karma. I have never once caught an anti-Brangelina whomever hating on other bloggers like that. (And yes I know, BAMZS fans will scour the blogs and look for one that has). # 213 | Sarah ============That is a sweeping generalization that an uninformed, biased and closed minded person can only take. You cannot substantiate what you say, other than your clouded judgement.You speak of lies because there are blog sites there who spew curses and death threats to innocent children. Go to FemaleFirst, to see for yourself.

Team Aniston’s clever spinWithout a doubt, the biggest story of the day: Us Weekly’s bold pronouncement that Jennifer Aniston and Vince Vaughn are engaged. Not exactly a surprise considering it’s been building for months now but what WAS surprising was the fanfare surrounding the report and the clever way it’s been launched around the world. The American weeklies usually go to print on Monday, by Tuesday afternoon, certain stories are leaked to the mainstream papers and the blogs to generate interest in newsstand sales. Sometimes though, if a particular scoop is particularly juicy, the magazines will keep their covers cloaked, preferring instead to let the bomb drop with a loud enough thud the next day. In this case, no one had a whiff of Us Weekly’s coup until this morning, when Janice Min supported her brand with an interview on the Today Show, during which she confidently declared that they had ‘multiple sources’ and one ‘very, very good’ account. But as quick as you can say ‘not so secret cocaine habit’, Aniston’s super flack Stephen Huvane released a statement from the Team: She is wrong. There is no engagement. On the surface, it looks like the makings of a full on battle, especially since Us Weekly quickly retorted on their blog, pretty much calling Huvane a liar and listing 4 previous fabrications he’s made with regards to his most attention starved client. But while it appears as though Us is throwing down the bloody gossip gauntlet, consider that the resulting *** for tat, word for word war has actually turned the engagement cover into a bigger deal than it was ever going to be in the first place, giving the story longer legs than it would have had if the whole situation just came and went. I mean, think about it. Since May, when press for The Break Up was starting to pick up momentum, has there been a week that’s gone by withOUT a ‘they’re getting married! At Oprah’s house!’ angle??? Also for your consideration: Us Weekly is EXCEEDINGLY specific with the details they’ve provided. They claim to know the precise date of the engagement (June 27), they claim to know where it happened (during a flight back from Mexico), they even claim to know how Vince originally planned to propose and why he changed it up. Now if you’re a tabloid junkie, you should be familiar with the tabloid tale telling standard - vague on logistics, vague on timing, vague on everything but the crux: ‘pregnant! Divorcing! Anorexic!’. If you need an example, please see Life & Style Weekly - they suck donkey ass. Officially. This time, however, Us Weekly’s information is so exact, you just know it came from an inside leak. And these days, when it comes to Jen’s ‘protective’ and publicity-savvy entourage, it’s hard to believe the leak wasn’t sanctioned. And if the leak was sanctioned, it’s hard to believe Stephen Huvane wouldn’t know about it. A publicity virtuoso is he … n’est-ce pas? Because not only does his star grace the week’s most exciting cover, the ‘controversy’ surrounding it has elevated the situation from just another Hollywood engagement to THE HOLLYWOOD ENGAGEMENT that everyone is talking about. Roll your eyes all you want, laugh it off all you want, but remember - she isn’t on the A list by accident. Jennifer Aniston, for all the mediocrity, can play it with the best of them. And if you’re willing to believe that some celebrities will go to great lengths to make babies or to hide babies or be gaygays and hide gaygays, why wouldn’t you believe that two celebrities would get into bed with a tabloid to stoke public fascination with their love lives? Oh wait. She’s America’s golden sweetgirl, right? She’s totally not insecure, right? She’s totally not ambitious, right? She’s not vain and starving or famewhorish, right? She would be your best friend in a Hollywood second, right? Please. If you believe that, you probably still believe that Clay Aiken ain’t gay. War or not, conspiracy or not, Jennifer Aniston and Vince Vaughn are engaged. And they desperately want you to know about it without wanting you to know that they want you to know. Get it? PS. Did you know that ‘Vince Vaughn’s Wild West Comedy Show was among the world premieres announced yesterday at the Toronto International Film Festival . The festival added 15 world premieres and five international premieres to the films expected to ATTRACT BUYERS at the 31st annual festival Sept. 7-16′ Totally just a coincidence, right???

# 233 | For Cliniq & FansMr & Mrs Smith made = Worldwide: $478,207,520. Nuff said.

One of my favorite quotes from a review of MAMS:"Pitt and Jolie play secret agents who don’t know each other’s line of work when they get married, then become rivals and eventually partners in the licensed-to-kill game. The movie is a mish-mash of action-adventure clichés, book-ended with lame attempts at psychological interest. Written, directed, and acted with ham-fisted heaviness." # 233 | For Cliniq & Fans******************Er, and your point is? That 1 out of 1000 critics didn’t like MAMS? Which you think combats the fact that 999 out of 1000 critics thinks Aniston is a BAD sitcom tv hack who shouldn’t be in films at all, as demonstrated in Rumor Has It, Derailed, TBU, and Friends w/ Money??Bottom line: MAMS= FRESH tomato, All 4 of Maniston’s films this year = ROTTEN tomato

In a recent interview with GQ magazine, Mr. Pitt states, "The idea that marriage has to be for all time - that I don’t understand." So what he is really trying to say that next time in the marriage vows, he would like to remove that old fashion notion of "till death do us part" and change it to "till I find someone better." I see. I conclude Brad feels permanent marriage is something he doesn’t believe in. How about sharing your lettermans jacket and you can just go steady?from: conversationsaboutfamouspeople - very funny blog, but sadly gone now. # 229 | Alaughanyone? =====================Actually, Brad described his marraige to Jennifer Aniston as a "merger" and Aniston says their marriage is an "experirment".If these are the words they used to describe the marriage, then we should not all be surprised that their marriage ended. In an interview with Charlie Rose, Brad said that he and Jen have opposite directions. A merger and/or experiment cannot survive if both parties do not walk on the same path.Should we not all be happy that their pretense and masquerade has finally ended.

I’m OUT! Back to the beautiful Angie’s thread - dogface is making me ill. Let’s go.

Girls, girls, what has happened to the "sisterhood" anyway. It’s very disconcerting to read the venomous posts from both sides against Jennifer and Angelina; only Brad seems to get a free ride here on JJ. I can’t trash talk another woman in this manner. Brad should have a mark on his forehead - Beware! Every relationship he has had ended badly with recriminations from him or the ex. I support Jennifer and Angelina and send best wishes to both women.

ANISTON IS A FAME SEEKING *****..EVERYONE KNOWS IT…HOLLYWOOD KNOWS IT!HER FAT COWS ARE STUCK ON RACHEL MODE!

# 235 | CLINIQUA You are full of **** as ever I see. You don’t fool me and you never will. Thanks for playing.