Top Stories

Jennifer Aniston Eats Sushi Roku

Jennifer Aniston Eats Sushi Roku

Jennifer Aniston, carrying her fave Bottega Veneta bag, was spotted leaving one of these two restaurants this past Thursday night (there are conflicting reports): Italian restaurant Il Sole located at 8741 Sunset Blvd. in West Hollywood, CA or Japanese restaurant Sushi Roku located at 8445 W 3rd St. in Los Angeles, CA.  Either way, her mug was covered by — what looks like — one of her bodyguards to protect herself from prying paparazzi.  More pictures in the gallery!

[Pictures via x17online.com]
Aniston Sushi jennifer aniston sushi roku 01
Aniston Sushi jennifer aniston sushi roku 02
Aniston Sushi jennifer aniston sushi roku 03
Aniston Sushi jennifer aniston sushi roku 04
Aniston Sushi jennifer aniston sushi roku 05
Aniston Sushi jennifer aniston sushi roku 06
Aniston Sushi jennifer aniston sushi roku 07
Aniston Sushi jennifer aniston sushi roku 08
Aniston Sushi jennifer aniston sushi roku 09
Aniston Sushi jennifer aniston sushi roku 10

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Jennifer Garner's alleged stalker is arrested - PopEater
  • Heidi Klum and her kids go to the mall - PopSugar
  • The Jersey Shore gang rocks out - Celebuzz
  • Nicole Kidman doesn't care to talk Scientology - Dlisted
  • Celebs come out for Vanessa Hudgens' party - JustJaredJr
  • A CSI: Miami star is arrested - TheSuperficial
  • Penelope Cruz & Javier Bardem visit NYC - LaineyGossip
Rachel Worth/WENN

754 Comments

Pages: « 125 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 » Show All
thatstheway @ 08/21/2006 at 2:54 am

Jennifer Aniston and Vince Vaughn Not Taking The Next Fake Step in their Fake RelationshipAugust 17th, 2006Reports that Jennifer Aniston and Vince Vaughn are not actually engaged are popping up all over the media. It seems that Us Weekly was a little quick to pull the trigger on their cover story the other day. Unfortunately for all Vaughneston fans the couple is not taking their fake relationship to the next fake level.It’s got to be tough for them. It’s not easy being two crazy kids falling in pretending to be in love. Especially not when the whole world is watching your fictitious courtship. Sometimes you just want to be left alone with your fake boyfriend without the world preempting your next move with huge splashy magazine covers. Ok, so you don’t believe me. You think Aniston and Vaughn are really madly in love. Well, you’re wrong.Think about it. Aniston’s just done breaking up with her husband in one of the most public divorces since Henry VIII. If she’s running around town single she’s admitting defeat. If she’s not in the headlines everyone thinks she’s no longer as famous because she’s no longer with Brad Pitt. Next thing you know she’s doing one hour shows on NBC instead of having a blossoming movie career (not that I’m naming names). Boom simple as that. Pitt wins, she loses.What’s in it for Vincey-Poo? The only way the guy was going to make headlines before this was if he went Robert Blake on someone. His career was doing well but he wasn’t a “star.” Why not pretend to be dating one of the hottest actresses around? Maybe you are good friends since you shot that movie together. Maybe you wouldn’t mind hanging out together to help each other’s careers. Maybe she mixes one hell of a dry martini.Fake-o-rama.So don’t look for these two to take the “plunge” any time soon. Not unless after all this pretending they really do fall in love. It could happen. It’s not like one of them is secretly gay and trying to uphold his image as a $25 million a picture “all-American” star. That would require some kind of contractual marriage to someone whose career was falling fast and had no chance of getting back in the limelight without such a relationship. That and you’d have to pretend to have a kid together.Nope, nothing like that happening here. Doesn’t it suck when you’re wrong?thatsthewayithappened.com

oh, Stat Man @ 08/21/2006 at 2:54 am

There is no real evidence, just a comment in a snarky gossip blog. And btw, that "lesbian" comment isn’t very PC. Why does that idea bother you so much?And another thing, why would that make me like Jen less? Or are you saying Jen and Angelina should get together and the heck with Brad? What?

Aniston: Fake Engagement Not RealBen CarrozzaDose.caSorry, Team Aniston, it turns out, the world’s greatest fake unofficial relationship isn’t ready to take it to the next level. In an exclusive interview with People magazine, Jennifer Aniston has denied reports that she and Vince Vaughn are engaged, calling the stories “insane” and saying that “people are getting fed a lot of bull.”Setting the record straight, Aniston hit back at a recent Us Weekly story that claimed Vaughn had proposed.“I’m not engaged and I don’t have a ring and I haven’t been proposed to,” Aniston said. “Normally, we don’t even acknowledge these things because they’re endless, at this point. [But] my dad calls and he says, ‘Honey, it’s on the CNN crawl,’ and I’m going, ‘Wait a second!’ When it starts to travel over into the Today show and CNN and supposedly reliable and accurate news programs, then you just go, ‘This is insane.’ People are getting fed a lot of bull.”Aniston then got all boring and preachy about the media.“Tabloids are going to lie all the time. You’re prepared for that. But it’s the news. And you think, ‘Well, we need to trust what our newscasters are saying when we have this horrific situation that’s actually taking place in the world. I mean, we are getting reported the truth, right?’ she told People. “The American people need to believe [the news]. Please. Get it together. So that’s all.”As for her “relationship” with Vaughn, “We’re just being,” Aniston says. “We’re having a good time.”Whether “having a good time” really meant they were just friends forced to hang out by damage-controlling agents, Aniston didn’t say.

More Stats @ 08/21/2006 at 2:59 am

I boldened the word "some people" because there are a lot of other people (perhaps the rational majority) who are not swayed by gossips and who would not believe in suppositions unless there is solid evidence on hand.Good night very happy 4 Jen. # 675 | Statistics Man I like solid evidence, but the speed of light with which brangelina unfolded following several high profile denials is a lot more believable than a snarky remark in a gossip blog. Just saying.

Statistics Man @ 08/21/2006 at 3:00 am

There is no real evidence, just a comment in a snarky gossip blog. And btw, that "lesbian" comment isn’t very PC. Why does that idea bother you so much?And another thing, why would that make me like Jen less? Or are you saying Jen and Angelina should get together and the heck with Brad? What? # 678 | oh, Stat Man==================Read Post 665 and 675. I said it was a rumor and it is not bothering me. I was just trying to explain that rumors are not to be taken as truth if there is no evidence. Rational thinking rules.

KARMA NOW @ 08/21/2006 at 3:01 am

I would think that with all the MOVIE BOMBS and horrible bad press and DISASTROUS personal life it should be clear by now who KARMA is bitting in the ass!

Theives in Night @ 08/21/2006 at 3:02 am

haha…haterzzz like to sneak in here after fans leave and spread their hate.Figures. lol

thieves in Night @ 08/21/2006 at 3:03 am

Thieves in the night. Typo.

I like solid evidence, but the speed of light with which brangelina unfolded following several high profile denials is a lot more believable than a snarky remark in a gossip blog. Just saying. # 680 | More Stats I think I meant a lot LESS believable.

Miss Rational @ 08/21/2006 at 3:12 am

I said it was a rumor and it is not bothering me. I was just trying to explain that rumors are not to be taken as truth if there is no evidence. Rational thinking rules. # 681 | Statistics ManI agree, but you do recognize the irony of having this conversation in a gossip blog? LOL

KARMA NOW @ 08/21/2006 at 3:14 am

I would think that with all the MOVIE BOMBS and horrible bad press and DISASTROUS personal life it should be clear by now who KARMA is bitting in the ass!

"I’m not a Julia fan either but it’s interesting that you feel you need to drag others down in order to drag Jolie up. # 635 | No fan of Julia | August 21, 2006 01:22 AM "THAT’S ALL THE BAMZS psychos can do. They need to bring others down, including Oprah, Michael Douglas, Julia, Courtney Cox, Kate Hudson (even her mother), Jessica Simpson, Christina Applegate, JA, Jon Voight, Fox News, other bloggers… ANYBODY and bring down ANYTHING to create a Holie Jolie. Jolie showed her true colors by having that baby with Brad. Not a saint. She’s weak and will do anything to keep her man. she’s not independent. Jolie is so wayward, it’s unbelievable. I don’t care how much charity or adoptions she does, which I am glad she is doing, but the only reason her fans worship her is because of her physical appearance and crazy antics. She is not respected for anything except her beauty. And that’s sad. It’s sad, because you never really see the true side of her. But real people, people who aren’t in some f***ed up world aren’t blinded by beauty or charity. There are so many beautiful people out there who do charity. People who do not support Brangelina anymore, can see right through to a fricken sex psycho. What Jolie did with Brad was cold hearted and mean spirited which is why people are against her now. WHEN SOMEONE IS GUILTY OF SOMETHING, THAT’S WHEN FANS COME OUT AND BECOME DEFENSIVE AND BEGIN WAR AND THAT’S WHAT BAMZS people are doing. BAMZ fans will find any reason to put down Jen, but it doesnt matter because what they dont realize is in fact they are bringing down Angelina’s image. ANGELINA IS JUST AS TRASHY AS BRITNEY SPEARS. And her fans are trashier. "Jen is ugly." "She’s famous because of Huvane!" WHATEVER. I’m still going to support Jennifer aniston and never suppport Brangelina again. I don’t give a damn what BAMZS fans have to say about Jen, she still A-okay in my book. The only reason people support Angelina is because she’s CRAZY. But for people who dont stare at the tv all day, the rest of us mature adults, know better.

KARMA NOW @ 08/21/2006 at 3:30 am

I would think that with all the MOVIE BOMBS and horrible bad press and DISASTROUS personal life it should be clear by now who KARMA is bitting in the ass!

to just curious @ 08/21/2006 at 3:31 am

what kind of human being would enter into any relationship just to further her career? Oh that would be jen aniston. # 658 | just curious and Tom Cruise. they are so similar in personality, calculative and manipulator,.

Statistics Man @ 08/21/2006 at 3:34 am

I like solid evidence, but the speed of light with which brangelina unfolded following several high profile denials is a lot more believable than a snarky remark in a gossip blog. Just saying. # 680 | More Stats—————–If I can get you right, you seem to have a hard time differentiating between "before" and "after" facts.Before the divorce was filed, there is no evidence to suggest that Brad and Angie had an affair. All parties denied it. Brad may perhaps been attracted to Angelina when he was still married but he did not physically and emotionally cheat. When somebody tells his wife about the attraction (if the quote from CC from VF is true), then there is no cheating, ‘coz cheating is disonesty and Brad was honest to talk about it and fought it for a long time.The attraction to Angelina contributed perhaps to the divorce, but it is not the reason. Brad and Jen’s "merger" can no longer hold as both parties have different interests and priorities (one of which is family vs. career) After the divorce, Brad pursued Angelina and Vince pursued Jen. Actually Vince and Jen were the first to be photographed kissing each other passionately. The pics in Kenya shows togetherness, but was there kissing? NONEThe only thing that perhaps you cannot take is that Brad and Angie conceived a child immediately after Brad was declared legally "SINGLE" (august 15 ??? not sure about the date, will check it later). He was already single but still forbidden by law to marry until October 2. So by the middle of August, Brad was no longer married.Everybody knows that his dream is to be a father. He said in his GQ 2005 interview, that he will make his dream happen … and he did. Why would anybody deny him happiness?Vince and Jen got together but have not conceived a child … because according to the Oprah interview, Vince is not keen on having children at that time (perhaps in the future?) and perhaps Jen is not yet prepared to have a child. I only have respect for their wishes.Brad and Angie are happy. Jen is happy to move on. I agree with some Jen fans that we should no longer associate Brad and Angie with Jen .. however, others are just too bitter to move on and still trashing Brad and Angie.I try to use reason when talking with Jen fans.I have no hatred for Jen; actually I want her to be happy.

http://thebosh.com/archives/2006/08/lindsay_lohan_slams_arch_rival_paris_hilton.php#moreLindsay Lohan (a supporter of Angelina Jolie, along with Paris Hilton) said in Vanity Fair: "’Sex and the City’ changed everything for me, because those girls would just sleep with so many people!"Look at these little kids who support Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt. How embarassing for you Brad and AJ. Oh ya, Pink (whose photos came up showing her pissing out of a car and also getting her nipple ring and whatever other ugly photo), that dumb guy from Scooby Doo movie and that scary movie, Britney spears, Christina aguillera, Jessica Simpson, the idiot Anne Hathaway (you should’ve heard how she gushed uncontrollably about Angelina on some radio talk show)… all these dumb chics. Oh and some bitchy lesbians. I dont support any of these people.

Statistics Man @ 08/21/2006 at 3:38 am

I agree, but you do recognize the irony of having this conversation in a gossip blog? LOL # 686 | Miss Rational ———————-Yes, even though this is a gossip blog one can still reason as to which is true and which is not.

freevoice @ 08/21/2006 at 3:40 am

Please, not all Aniston haters are Brangelina fans. You might love her but not everyone buy her antic. just like any celebrity, they have fans and they have people don’t like them. This a blog site, people are free to voice their opinion. period.

Rock On Jen @ 08/21/2006 at 3:49 am

Statistics Man, no one cares about your psycho statistics. See how crazy BAMZ fans are? Look how far they’llgo to support a couple of celebs. People are crazy about them but that doesnt matter because they’re lunatics. Next subject…No one cares who is more beautiful or who is more popular. That said you should realize that people who support Jen support her for no shallow reasons. The people who support Jen are more mature and arent little teenagers. That’s the reason for the high hits on Angelina’s websites. She knows how to grab attention of crazy youngsters. Jen isn’t about that. She isnt about doing crazy things for selfish reasons or to fulfill any crazy wishful thinking. She’s just a down to earth normal person, which is why people like her. she’s simple and she’s cute and she’s funny. And that’s what we love about Jen. She doesn’t have do anything crazy or outlandish to bring attention to herself. She is who she is and if people can’t accept that, then so be it. All she wants is to be happy in life and that makes me happy for her. I like her personality. She’s an open, warm-hearted person. And she doesn’t go to extremes to become a celeb.

Statistics Man @ 08/21/2006 at 3:52 am

Look at these little kids who support Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt. How embarassing for you Brad and AJ. Oh ya, Pink (whose photos came up showing her pissing out of a car and also getting her nipple ring and whatever other ugly photo), that dumb guy from Scooby Doo movie and that scary movie, Britney spears, Christina aguillera, Jessica Simpson, the idiot Anne Hathaway (you should’ve heard how she gushed uncontrollably about Angelina on some radio talk show)… all these dumb chics. Oh and some bitchy lesbians. I dont support any of these people. # 692 | KA |================I think what you have is a "tunnel view". You seem to emphasize only the negative. For your better understanding, here is another view of Angelina.Colin Powell, Angelina Jolie Give Refugee Poster Awards Daniel Warshawskyfor National Geographic NewsJune 16, 2004U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell and movie actress Angelina Jolie today presented the fourth annual World Refugee Day poster awards at the National Geographic Society’s headquarters in Washington, D.C. "There is no better way to begin this important event," First Lady Laura Bush told the winners in a taped message about this year’s World Refugee Day events. Jolie is a goodwill ambassador for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). She also sponsors the annual poster contest, which encourages U.S. students to think in creative ways about refugees. As many as 40 million people worldwide may be refugees, having fled their home countries to escape danger or persecution. The U.S. is the largest financial supporter of the UNHCR and some 2.5 million refugees have made their home in the U.S., Bush said. "It is important to make them feel at home," she added. "The President and I are very proud of you," she told the poster competition winners. Three winners were chosen for their creativity and thoughtfulness in this year’s competition. Anna Mullen, a fifth grader from Northwood Elementary School in High Point, North Carolina, won in the 4th-to 6th-grade category. Phoebe Sturey, an eighth grader from Cochranton Middle School in Cochranton, Pennsylvania, won in the 7th-to 8th-grade category, while Tania Ku, a 12th grader from Saratoga High School in Saratoga, California, won in the 9th-to 12th-grade category. The winners were invited to have their photo taken with Powell and Jolie, and were flown to Washington with their families for the ceremony. UNHCR leaders and other guests were at National Geographic to celebrate the official launch of World Refugee Day events. In 2000, the UN designated June 20 as annual World Refugee Day to recognize and celebrate the contribution of refugees. More than a hundred countries take part in the event. World Refugee Day brings worldwide attention to the struggles and challenges that the millions of refugees confront each year throughout the world. During the next few days, various events will reinforce this year’s theme, "A Place to Call Home," by emphasizing refugees’ challenges relating to identity, community integration, and a sense of belonging.here is another one:June 21, 2004 - The Washington Post reports Angelina Jolie visited the National Geographic Society to launch World Refugee Day with one of her big fans — Secretary of State Colin Powell — and to announce that she’s donating $500,000 to provide attorneys for child refugees who arrive in the United States without parents.

only a pov @ 08/21/2006 at 3:57 am

I think that the big part of the haters are ex jen fans that have been betrayed from their idol. Sure there are the brangelina and bamzs fans too, but ex fans of JA are the big part because every time that i come in this blog and i read comment on the thread of JA the hateful comment are of blogger that know very well the history of JA, so from the 2: are they obsessioned by her that search news about her, or are ex fans that before loved her and now how lover betrayed they hate her. Only a point of view.

KARMA NOW @ 08/21/2006 at 4:00 am

I would think that with all the MOVIE BOMBS and horrible bad press and DISASTROUS personal life it should be clear by now who KARMA is bitting in the ass!

Rock On Jen @ 08/21/2006 at 4:12 am

Statistics Man, of course she has the support of "others" for her work in the UN. But my point was look at her supporters here in america. Angelina was and is no different than these attention getting whores like Lohan and Paris. If you compare their lives, you’ll notice similarities of how they displayed their love lives and did and said crazy wild things to grab attention. Angelina may not want to have anything to do with Hollywood, but she played right into Hollywood growing up and in her 20s. She did EVERYTHING that a typical Hollywood raised spoiled celeb kid does. She is EXACTLY like those Hollywood kids that everyone rags on in these blogs. Angelina hasnt changed. She’s still typical but modern Hollywood. The only thing she could do to raise her image is charity and adoptions and immediately having that baby.

Rock on Jen @ 08/21/2006 at 4:15 am

Statistics Man, a majority of your statistics are LIES. You are swaying words and misinterpreting events to your liking. Basically, you are another BAMZS psycho.

KARMA NOW @ 08/21/2006 at 4:15 am

I would think that with all the MOVIE BOMBS and horrible bad press and DISASTROUS personal life it should be clear by now who KARMA is bitting in the ass!

Pages: « 125 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.