Brad Pitt in New Orleans

|#2161 Alexanderina|She is cute. She has Katie’s eyes.

|#2161 Alexanderina|She is cute. She has Katie’s eyes.

# 2175 | Passing Through ITA, At least Tom doesn’t has a big mouth X at his back. and Suri wasn’t wish death and stillborn like Shiloh by the pathetic haters.

# 2176 please I calmed down and I’ll stop.

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Actor Tom Cruise’s infant daughter made her debut on Tuesday as freshman CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric broke the story of Vanity Fair magazine landing the much-anticipated first photos of baby Suri.The photographs of the dark-haired baby born to Cruise and actress Katie Holmes on April 18 were televised about midway through the newscast, marking the first public glimpse of the actor’s first biological child.Given to CBS News by Vanity Fair as an exclusive to promote the magazine’s 22-page Suri photo spread hitting newsstands on Wednesday, the pictures were taken by celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz, magazine spokeswoman Beth Kseniak said.One shot aired by CBS News and later circulated on the Internet was the cover photo showing the smiling parents with their daughter peeking out from inside the actor’s leather jacket. A second showed Holmes lying on her back holding the baby over her.The photos put an end to speculation that had swirled in the tabloids about why baby Suri had remained out of the public eye for so long, including rumours questioning the child’s existence.The pictures were shown during a segment called "Snapshots," part of the revamped format inherited by Couric as she began her tenure as the first woman solo anchor of a major U.S. network newscast."We knew this would be a very exciting show — that everyone would be curious to see Katie on her first night. So, what better place to debut Vanity Fair’s exclusive cover featuring baby Suri and her parents," Kseniak told Reuters.She said the magazine paid nothing for the photographs and unlike pictures of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s first child together, there was no distribution deal tied to charity.Suri was born after months of nonstop publicity generated by the courtship of Cruise and Holmes, which burst into the open in May 2005 when the actor giddily professed his love for the actress during a notorious couch-hopping appearance on "The Oprah Winfrey Show."A month later, Cruise announced he had proposed marriage to Holmes at the Eiffel Tower in Paris, which was followed later by Cruise’s statement that his fiancee had embraced his faith in the Church of Scientology.Cruise made headlines again last month when Viacom Inc. Chairman Sumner Redstone revealed that his Paramount Pictures studio was severing ties with the actor’s production company after 14 years, citing the star’s off-camera behaviour.© Reuters 2006. All Rights Reserved.

# 2185 | CLINIQUA | - lol, I love it, but damn it was short, you should really continue it

She said the magazine paid nothing for the photographs and unlike pictures of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s first child together, there was no distribution deal tied to charity.—-Wonder if that Walter Scott person from Parade magazine approvs of this. I personally think its a waste. The money generated from this could go to a really worthy cause or two.

Hee! :-) Thanks Alexanderina! I have so many I need to continue at this point, I’m losing track! LOLOL! Glad you likey! :-D

# 2186 | NO MONEY Sinking career.

# 2186 | NO MONEY | - Okay call me a cynic, but come on, are we to believe that TC did not get paid for these pictures, that he just did it out of the goodness of his heart, people he wanted the world to see Suri, maybe it is true, but am not buying it

should be "because" instead of "people"

# 2198 | Alexanderina I agree. For yrs celebs were getting money without the public knowing. Its a bit fishy. But I assume Tom C.’s career is his charity. He needs it more LOL. # 2197 | Yup God, I know. I hate that. But I stoped buying that magazine since Aniston’s pitty fest. One less profit for VF, yeah! lol