OlderAngelina Jolie Does Charitable Work
There was a supposed rift between Angelina Jolie and Nicole Kidman after Scotland’s Daily Record quoted Kidman as saying, “It’s not like Angelina is any better than a nurse working in a hospital, but she’s getting the publicity for her contribution.”
Yesterday, The Daily Record admitted that Kidman never said those things about Angelina and apologized for “any upset caused.” Instead, Kidman’s publicist, Catherine Olim did release a statement on behalf of Nicole Kidman:
“Ms. Kidman has tremendous admiration for Angelina Jolie and her tireless, worldwide charitable work, as well as for the work of countless less well known volunteers in areas of need around the world.”
Pictures in this entry include Angelina Jolie driving around Los Angeles this past Friday, September 15. More pictures in the gallery!
Share This Post:
1,055 Comments
I think that these haters are not going to stop this insanity until Brad and Angelina finally legally get married and publish their wedding photo. Until then these crazies will continue to hope against hope that Brad and Jennifer will reunite someday.
318 | Barb |
****************
Eh, then they’d just say Angie forced him into it or blackmailed him or something. I do think their group is shrinking considerably, though. More and more people are seeing things as they really are. Love always shines through, and Angie and Brad have found true love.
sarah - here’s a question ofr Jen. When did you first boink Vince? Or was all that dry humping on the balcony just for the publicity? If Brad’s gotta answer you vile Q&A, Jen should have to own up to her own hanky panky BEFORE THE DIVORCE WAS FINAL.
WHAT KIND OF MENTAL HEALTH FACILITY LET THAT SARAH PATIENT USE THE INTERNET?? NOW ALL CAN SEE HOW SICK SOME OF THESE X FANS ARE!! WHAT KIND OF IDIOT ASKS A STRANGER QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT STRANGER’S LIFE?? I HAVE NEVER EVEN SEEN ANYTHING THE X WAS IN THAT WOULD CAUSE SOMEONE LIKE SARAH TO COMPLETELY LOSE HER MIND BUT THAT MUST BE THE CAUSE OF HER COMPLETE LOSS OF HER MENTAL COMPETENCY. BRAD PITT WAS NOT MARRIED TO YOU STUPID. HOW DARE YOU CAST DOUBT ON SHILOH, SHE IS THE IMAGE OF BRAD PITT. YOU ARE SICK SICK SICK.
Hey Guys, talk to you all later going home now
32. What does he think about the negative opinion rating he received from the Gallup Poll of May 2006 (42% favorable; 35% unfavorable: men - 30%, women: 40%)?
33. What does he think about the negative opinion rating Jolie received from the Gallup Poll of May 2006 (43% favorable; 28% unfavorable: men - 23%, women: 34%)?
34. What does he think about the fact that Jen received the highest positive rating and the lowest negative rating of the three (59% favorable; 12% unfavorable - men: 13%, women: 10%)?
273 | sarah |
“”"”"”"”"”"”"”"”
If these statistics are so accurate and JA is more favorable than B&A:
1.Why all of her movies such as “Delaired”
“Friends with money” and “Rumor has it” were the biggest flops in the box office and now everybody calls her “Box office poison”?
2.And why Mr and Mrs Smith made more than $400 mill
dollars worldwide after their images were already “damaged”?
#311
I came on here because when I went to the JJ site, the picture was there. I always get a kick out of reading your entries….look at her nails are short, they were long yesterday, Brad will never leave, etc. You guys are in some fantasyland where you think you actually know these people. And, when called on the carpet, don’t deny that you call these people “saints” or “first lady”. It’s in print people. It’s sad, really, to think that you guys spend so much time at your computer, fantasizing about what the Jolie-Pitts are doing now.
And, getting back to the Kidman comment. I’m really glad that she said something to the effect of public servants being more important. And, that said, I am talking about all celebrities here…..it’s always amazed me that celebrities, athletes, etc. make so much money…and the people that can save their lives make incredibly less. Something is wrong with this picture. I’m happy that at least Kidman gave a shout out to those people, even if she denies what she said about Jolie.
Ok, psychos…c’mon attack me lol lol
Patti
Do you know what is sadder, that you spend so much of your time waiting for us to respond to you and so much of your energies hating a couple you don’t know and so much of your time discussing why you hate them. I felt sorry for you, so here you go, a response. I’m sure you appreciate it.
Patti , When did any celeb ever say that they were more important than public servants? I agree with you that alot in life just is not fair, but are we going to blame celebs for that, Mrs. Jolie and Clooney , Oprah , have never said that “those peope” did not deserve credit.
338 | bunch of loonies
Hey girl. How you doing? Haven’t talked to you since the Great Dell Customer Service debate of summer ‘06. lol
Sarah, if you think all Brad should do is look good and give good performances, then that’s really all you need to worry about. So stop being so worried what happens in his personal life since you yourself are saying that Brad should just be an actor. Go talk about his professional life as an actor and quit worrying about statistics and useless questions.
340 | Maniston
i thought you were leaving town!
337 | Patti | -I’m attacking you. Do you feel better now?
342 | gitane
I am. Tomorrow. Right now I’m in the middle of doing laundry so that I can pack.
interesting little tidbit i got off of pittwatch.com
I know I would, but I can think of about a million things I would rather do than shop with him. Ha ha! In this (slightly odd) survey, from Fashion Monitor Toronto:
One in four Holt Renfrew shoppers say Brad Pitt is the celebrity they prefer to spend the day with when searching for that perfect evening gown or weekend look, the survey conducted by Holt Renfrew revealed.
Brad Pitt was choice #1 when it came to spending a day of shopping with, while 50% of respondents agreed that Reese Witherspoon had the best style to grace the red carpet.
shopping with brad? i dunno…only if we were picking out clothes for him and i could make him model.
And, when called on the carpet, don’t deny that you call these people “saints” or “first lady”. It’s in print people.
337 | Patti |
*********************
Spare me. Called on the carpet about what, exactly? Nobody says anybody is a saint or “First lady”. You are imagining things. I have never seen anybody write that. We are a very large and diverse group, and yet you assume “everybody” does this or that. We don’t all think alike, and there is no stereotype.
I happen to be one of those public servants, and I agree with Angie when she says that actors get paid way too much for what they do…..but I don’t think anybody os going to be changing that anytime soon, and bitching about how unjust that is isn’t going to help anybody….so, I am glad there are a few high-dollar folks like Brad & Angie, and Nicole raising awareness.
337 | Patti
Patti, I’m LMAO right now and you know what? So is everyone
else! Calling us psychos will not make us into psychos any
more that your continuing to comment will turn you into an
intelligent, thoughtful poster. NOT GONNA HAPPEN. But keep
posting, I enjoy laughing!
Attn BAMZS fans….an UPDATE on Pitt and MI4:
Credit:Hollywood-elsewhere and some comments to tie it all in…:lol:
That story about Brad Pitt supposed being “lined up” to replace Tom Cruise in the next Mission: Impossible film is ” totally untrue” and “utter fiction,” a senior Paramount Pictures spokesperson said early this afternoon.
Okay…the Pitt deal is a pipe dream. Does this mean Paramount intends to make M:I:4 (assuming they want to produce it) with Cruise, despite Viacom chief Sumner Redstone having recently booted him off the Paramount lot? The Mission: Impossible franchise “has been an extremely successful one for this studio, ” the spokesperson replied, “but whatever moves we make regarding the future makeup of these films is undetermined at this time.”
The story was linked and/or posted on Hollywood Wiretap, Jo Blo and Cinematical this morning, but the origin was an Evening Standard site called http://www.this islondon.co.uk, or “London Lite.”
The questionable “London Lite” story said that Pitt starring in the franchise would make him “the highest-paid actor in Hollywood history”, with “sources” saying that Paramount is “willing” to offer a salary topping 21 million pounds, or something approaching the vicinity of $40 million U.S. dollars.
“An insider told London Lite that ‘MI:IV will not include Cruise’s character, agent Ethan Hunt’ and that Paramount-based producers “are set on Brad taking over as a gutsy new head operative who puts together his own unique team of specialists.” The story said that “they’re considering a brief mention, saying Hunt retired to live a safe life with his new wife”, blah, blah.
Comments
The franchise is dead. Let it go. And British tabloids are not exactly the greatest source for news. There’s more information in the Weekly World News.
Posted by: The Winchester [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 19, 2006 01:43 PM
Agreed on both counts. Entertainment news from London should be disregarded by default.
Posted by: JoeGreenia [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 19, 2006 02:07 PM
The Brad Pitt fascination continues to boggle me.
With the sole exception of Mr. and Mrs. Smith, which was helped by the tabloid aura of his love life, Pitt’s biggest hits as a sole star (ie. not the Ocean’s films) are tantamount to worse than Cruise’s biggest flops.
More than any other major star working today, Pitt oozes a ‘flake’ persona.
He is no ‘art’ actor like a DeNiro, Depp or Pacino who can go back and forth between art and commerce type projects.
Pitt seems to be like many current movie stars who keep getting top salaries in big vehicles despite their performance, not because of.
A few posts down people were baffled by the appeal of Kevin Costner. Costner’s resume, from the Untouchables to say the mid nineties, is more solid than any stretch Pitt has ever done. And unlike Pitt, he doesn’t trade in on a male ditz/himbo persona.
Remember, the true star of Fight Club is Fincher, not Pitt.
Posted by: Nicol D [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 19, 2006 03:18 PM
No more Mission Impossibles. Please. Three is more than enough. And no one will care if Tom isn’t in it.
I do think Pitt is a good actor and has picked some good roles in the past (Fight Club, 12 Monkeys, Interview with the Vampire) and I thought he came across as very intelligent and interesting on the Fight Club commentary. But his choice of bland star vehicle type roles lately has been disappointing.
Nicol D, I love Fincher and all but I think the real star of Fight Club was Chuck Palahniuk’s book. Fincher will never find material of that quality again.
Posted by: sprofessor [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 19, 2006 03:39 PM
Geez, why not? This franchise could keep going with either Cruise or another actor (though Cruise looks very unlikely, obviously). Of the three movies, two of them were quite entertaining. Just keep John Woo away from any future installments.
Pitt would be good,… but why would he do it?
Posted by: Josh Massey [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 19, 2006 04:00 PM
Nicol D,
Pitt’s popularity with studios shouldn’t be boggling your mind.
The box office from his last two big movies alone, TROY & M&M SMITH, was $650 million.
And that’s just FOREIGN only.
It’s all about the foreign, which is increasingly outgrossing the domestic.
Posted by: Dixon Steele [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 19, 2006 04:43 PM
#325 — Sarah can count? Maybe she hasn’t answered any of your questions because she can only count to 2 and that’s with her fingers. The poor dear!
Alex: Good Night!! Get home safe!
337 | Patti - It is interesting the pot calling the kettle black when you yourself spend so much time analyzing the length of her nails from one day to the next. You obviously spend a lot of time fantacizing yourself.
Hey Maniston
I eventually got my laptop back! Go me!! I’ve been busy but I pop in every now and then to check out the comments and it never ceases to amaze me how people who hate bamzs write the same thing over and over for the past two years. Now they just sound really, really bitter and in way over their heads in denial when they write those same comments. I think it’s funny that these same people call us idol worshippers, when they themselves have put Jen on a pedestal so high, no amount of fact-checking can make them believe anything bad about their idol. To this day, two years later, they are still calling foul. It’s completely mental.
344 | Maniston
you’re bad, but not as bad as me. when i was younger and less traveled i’d have my bags packed a week in advance. now, it’s amazing if i’m packed an hour before i’m supposed to leave. and, i’ve been known to take dirty clothes with me to wash when i get wherever i’m going.
Did you see Stephen and him at the Emmys?
316 | Amaya | 09/19/06 8:07
Yes, yes! I LOVE Stewart and Stephen Colbert. And Steve Carell
is god (genuflecting reverently). I loved when they were all on
The Daily Show together.
Also, does JJ have a new rule, once a new B&A thread is started the old one is closed…that kind of sucks, as I could look at the banksy photos all damn day. LOLOL
10 | CLINIQUA |
++++++++++++++++++
Hey Cliniqua here the link:
http://www.splash-video.com/index.html
Sarah there are really good Mental facilities for you type of problem!!!
HELLO EVERYONE!!
Pages: « 1 … 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 … 40 » Show All