Brad Pitt Plays Beautiful in Boxers

With respects to Lainey, while she does admit that she fascinated with BAMZS, I do think that she placates the straggler X fans who still read her blog. Personally, I don’t think it’s at all necessary for her to label us ‘Brangelunies’ simply because some fans are dilligent enough to contact her about incorrect info. I like her analysis, but she definitely gets off on getting people pissed off at her and unfortunately, some of us are feeding into her compulsion.

testing 1 2 3

Funny Says:

October 31st, 2006 at 9:34 pm

So she cries when she watches The Champ with Rick Schroeder, well guess who was the lead in that movie: Jon Voight.

ntt, thanks for the compliment.

Just a little more in defence of Lainey. I agree that she writes a lot of SH** a lot of the time, like other gossip columnists, especially when it comes to the BAMZS who seem to have locked down on all their leaks. On my scale of reading Gossip SH**, I would place Lainey above any of the Tablies except People Magazine or an actual interview. I would also place Lainey above Ted C, who IMHO, seems most truly overflowing with SH**. I can never understand that guy. (Is that just me or is it you. I’ve stopped reading TC)

When Lainey writes well, it is entertaining to read her SH**. At least, where BAMZS are concerned, she isn’t saying they are splitting up or what ever. She just doesn’t know and just speculates, like the rest of us.

Anyway, we can all agree to disagree on the matter of Lainey bcoz, in the scheme of things, except when Lainey is clarifying Brad and Angelina’s charity efforts, the rest of her column is just fluff to entertain ourselves with. Not life and death, which the charities could be. Will BB much later.

http://www.souliejolie.com/forum/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=26861

Jolie-Pitt in the park - bigger picture..

deena Says:
October 31st, 2006 at 10:10 pm

Sooooo…..it’s OK if I STEAL the magazine?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

just rip the cover off and run

jpf,

Whatever - this isn’t a competition. I respect your opinion, mine just happens to differ - and I said why. I’m not about one upmanship, that’s not where I come from. I enjoy talking and discussing and various differing opinions don’t bother me at all…I welcome them! So your tone is not needed. I hold the opinion I do because Brad has indeed issued a statement, which in my opinion validates what I’m saying. If Brad hadn’t done that, IMO what you say would make a great deal of sense. But at the end of the day - he’s ‘disappointed’ that they used and unauthorized image and questions their ‘motives and integrity.’ That’s a VERY strong statement, that tells me where he’s coming from. You may not see it that way - and that’s cool. But in my experience, it’s pretty unprecedented.

Ooooh believe me, QQQQ, I wouldn’t put a penny in their coffer after what they did and continue doing to our sweet Bradley.

To the Lainey conversation I would like to repost somethin I saw this morning that made me chuckle:
*******************************************************************
Be sane Says:

October 31st, 2006 at 7:43 am
Brad is doing exactly what he said he will do in 2005 Sawyer interview; He can’t get out of the press so he would bring them to those who can’t get into the press. A certain sitcom actress can learn from him and do something for others for change. As Lainey says, sniffing on Oprah’s couch doesn’t feed babies.
********************************************************************
She can turn a phrase!

Here is Brad Pitt as you’ve never seen him before. Clad in a pair of white boxer shorts, the 42-year-old Hollywood star oozes sex appeal.

The image, which features on the cover of the latest edition of Vanity Fair, is the work of avant-garde New York impresario Robert Wilson.

CLICK HERE to check out the video art starring Brad. It was inspired by the character Winnie in Samuel Beckett’s play ‘Happy Days.’ Wilson’s subjects were asked to “think of nothing” and limit their movements to one or two slow-motion gestures.

The resulting high-definition video was then turned into a sequence, with each portrait costing about $50 000 to produce. The work will be displayed at New York galleries in January.

Vanity Fair is out on November 9.

Today’s show is featuring Madonna tomorrow, I think. Madonna said she knew they were going say her adoption was a PR job because she heard what they said about Angie but she never expected people to say she kidnapped a baby. Also ET is going to show Angie in TGS but I didn’t hear when. Does anyone know when?

CLINIQUA: October 31st, 2006 at 10:21 pm

I’m really disappointed that you’ve viewed this as anymore than my opinion being expressed. I thought I chose my words carefully and with a determined plan to not have them be viewed as anything other than “this is how I see it, and how I see it differently than you see it.” I’m not at all sure what you mean by “your tone is not needed.” That one sincerely confuses me, and I’m truly sorry that an opposing view can’t be debated without it being seen as simply what it is, and opposing view. It’s all good. In the grand scheme of it all I’m sure we both have bigger fish to fry.

jpf

Eversince Brangelina, this guy has become hotter by the day.
Go BAMZS!!!