Angelina Jolie Lovin’ it at McDonald’s

^^The pix is definitely hot, but I really really don’t appreciate Perez calling her a ****! Confusing Angie with his airhead namesake, maybe?
Or, maybe Perez sold out already to the Huvanistons???

NEW THREAD!!

No prob, Susie

susie Says: November 16th, 2006 at 10:27 am

Clearly Perez is a BAMZ hater and Haggiston fan, but he post has a great picture.

^^

Not true. As vile, putrid and downright disgusting as the man can get, he adores Angelina AND Brad, and has a hate on for Jennifer A. the likes of I havent seen from a gossip site owner.

Perez is most definitely NOT a Angie hater. He worships her. He absolutely loathes Jennifer Aniston. I am sure he was just trash talking when he said “Congrats *lut.”

Oldie Says: November 16th, 2006 at 9:50 am

As the names of Jolie & Pitt raised the profile of this film shoot, I wonder how other producers in Hollywood will now look at India.

I read before that Bollywood is keen on attracting Hollywood to shoot movies in India, but the news from the AMH shoot seems not be positive. Will the money savings justify the aggravation that the actors and crew have to go through?

^^

Lurking here a few mths back somebody put up this article about filming there and Im so happy it got saved.

Passage India rough for foreign filmmakers
Bharti Dubey

[ 23 Oct, 2006 0057hrs ISTTIMES NEWS NETWORK ]

MUMBAI: Two road accidents, numerous fisticuffs and schedules gone awry. These jottings in the Brangelina tour diary of Pune’s heat and dust say it all. Will the reel-life Mr and Mrs Smith ever return to India to shoot a film?

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt may have realised by now why veteran Hollywood director Oliver Stone didn’t shoot his controversial movie ‘Alexander’ in India, despite his much-publicised reconnaissance trip.

They may even sympathise with the British crew who were not on talking terms with their Indian counterparts towards the completion of the Oscar-winner ‘Gandhi’ almost three decades back.

The truth is that Bollywood’s countryside is different from Planet Hollywood. Here, postponements are nothing out of the ordinary and laptops are alien to film sets. In contrast, Hollywood teams stick to schedules and juggle their production needs with computers. Stone flew out the moment he hit Indian red tape.

Worst, say actors who have been part of western filmmaking, there is a tendency to make a quick buck from unsuspecting foreign crews. When Hollywood actor Matt Damon and the ‘Bourne Identity’ crew came down for a shoot in Goa, they overshot the estimated budget by almost a double. Bollywood lore has it that room rates were overstated and so were local manpower costs. Hollywood teams depend on desi line producers, who keep accounts on paper unlike their Hollwood counterparts. Richard Attenborough’s ‘Gandhi’, too, had gone over budget.

Recalls a unit member of the film, “The total budget allotted that time was Rs 6.5 crore, but the amount was exhausted in making half the film.” Thankfully, the government of the day backed the project and the film was completed.
In hindsight, the unit member feels the British crew didn’t understand the Indian crew’s way of functioning, leading to costs spiralling. “But there is no denying the tension between the British and Indians. More often than not, they didn’t communicate with each other, which again affected the film,” he insists.
Twenty-four years later, the storyline is the same. The Indian line producers are still not able to handle the budgets allotted to them. Not surprisingly then, the Hollywood production ‘Marigold’, which boasts of an Indian star, has gone over budget.

India’s greatest defeat in this regard has been its failure to come up with efficient service providers a concept that has made countries like Thailand and South Korea a favourite with Hollywood. Service providers are literally people who hold the foreign crew’s hand through local paperwork and jargon.

In the absence of such professionals, Hollywood crew depend on word-of-mouth recommendations. The reccomendations are not always apt. Says Udayshankar Pani, who has worked for ‘Gandhi’ and has been a line producer for many German films shot in India, “There are not enough service providers and Indian film schools don’t treat production as a serious subject.”

Gulshan Grover, who has worked in many Hollywood films, feels both sides are to be blamed for the communication gap. He says, “We have some of the most talented guys who are good at multi-tasking despite the poor infrastructure, but a few among us have the habit of getting more out of the dollar-spending guys.
The foreign crew, too, have to shoulder a bit of the blame. They treat us very badly and behave as if they are doing us a favour.” German filmmakers like Michael Enke confess that though their companies are ready to invest in India, many are put off by their previous experiences.

Enke was helped by Pani for his film, but says that many other filmmakers are at the mercy of tour operators who double up as service providers. Hollywood’s favourite locales Goa, Kerala, Ladakh and Rajasthan in fact, have many such tourist operators doubling as service providers and making a hash of the job.
Says Dilip Borkar, who has been a service provider for Indian and foreign film units for 15 years, “Most often these so-called service providers fleece the foreign producers who are ignorant about India. The stories float around and international film producers prefer not to return because of the negative stories.”
But Arjun Bagga of Nora Films, who was the production manager for Omar Sharif’s ‘One Night With The King’, refuses to take a dim view of things. He feels we need to start by clearly revealing the ground realities of our country.
“For instance, it takes four days to get equipment cleared from the customs. If the foreign crew is informed about this and organises itself accordingly, lot of heartburn will be avoided,” Bagga adds.

source - http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/article…975,curpg-1.cms

info Says:

November 16th, 2006 at 5:16 am
I was lurkig on Men’s Style forums and I found this great post re Jennifer Aniston’s Man of the Year GQ cover. I’ve always wanted a guy’s perspective on JA, and I think this sums it up:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Ok. I’m a guy, you know, the base audiance of this magazine. I have to tell you Jennifer Aniston ain’t my idea of a woman with grace or whatever lame thing you gave her. She had one tired joke-”billy idol wants his hair back”, he’s -brad- is missing a “sensitivity chip.” That’s all. That was a sense of humor? Please, this is lame guys. Can’t anyone tell the difference between a bitter shot and a joke? You can do better than this. Is this Cosmo or GQ.? Leave this pitty party stuff to the ladies to fawn over and obssess about. Let them have their mags with the stupid and airheaded “you go jen ref.s’” In the future please spair us the women gossip-touchy feely ****. Do us that one tiny favor.

Don’t get me wrong. I ain’t mad at seeing a naked chick on a cover-little boney for my tastes but whatever-nice breast shot-wonder if they are real, like that matters

The problem I have is she isn’t different from any body else, so why all the fuss? She got a legal separation from pretty boy Brad-her choice. She filed for divorce-again her choice. She wollowed in pitty-her choice. She obsessed over her body-her choice. And she gave a lame interview where she and her sorority sisters slamed Brad. Which by the way was so freakin’ funny considering that I don’t think those chicks where in the bed with them when the lights went out-unless they were into that kind of thing-which is much more interesting to read about then this

Such a shame home girl wants to play the victim. Gotta say men do not find desperation attractive-unless we are in a club looking to score-oh, almost forgot, way to go VINCE V!. Rebound sex is the best sex you can have brother.

No one is reading this stuff, watching her on tv shows to see her doing well, they want to hear her gab on about her failed relationship. That’s all. She has nothing to offer them. Not that she’s not talented. It’s just that for now all she is to the world at large is a joke. A person to pitty till we are all blue in the face. You guys could have done better in getting a real choice for this title. She is no victim and she is no role model either.

If I had a choice, shame I don’t, I would have picked Angelina Jolie. Why? well isn’t it obvious? Hot ass woman that loves to help others and not wine like a baby about define me and oh don’t take my picture. I love a woman that knows when to speak and when to shut up. Jenn A. should take a page from her. News yrs resolution for her should be: “I must learn to be quite and stop boring people with my pitty part/moving on talk”

But hey, only one guys opinion, not like I help keep this mag. afloat with a subscription, oh wait I do.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Anyone that believes this came from ‘a guy’ is very likely taken advantage of on a daily basis, LMFAO.

“ANNOUNCING - A Breakthrough Trading System Specially Created for Newbie’s, That Could Earn You an Extra $50, 100 or Even $200 a Day Just By 15 Minutes A Day. GUARANTEED!”

http://tradingcourses.biz/

I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100% regarding s | Angelina Jolie : Just Jared, but it’s just my opinion, which could be wrong