Tom & Katie Take Suri For A Walk

At first I thought Suri looked a lot like Tom but now I think she may be favoring Katie. She definitely has Tom’s nose; there’s very little bridge to it. She’s a cute little girl. Almost funny-looking in a way but I’ll be she’s going to grow up beautifully

They look like they are trying to appear to be something they’re not. Suri is dressed like she’s going to her christening not dinner. This whole weekend of wedding events would be so sweet and great if it wasn’t such an obvious publicity circus. They’re loving it and that’s what makes it sick.

Katie can’t f*cking take her baby to the park or the mall or out for a walk, but suddenly they whip her out all dressed up when they need to?

I would give them more credit if Katie (who is clearly not working since she’s in Paris one day then shopping at Barneys in BH the next) was walking around BH or Brentwood or wherever they live pushing her child and doing regular mommy things.

Brangelina, Gwen, even Britney drag their brats around with them. Maybe its actually because they care and want to see their kids.

Geez Katie snap the f**k out of it!!!!

Where is that kid from Vanity Fair? This one looks almost nothing like her.

@ Why, re: “Why are they walking around in the afternoon all dressed up like that? “parading” is the right word. I love how other celebs who take their kids with them all the time are accused of parading them, but here you have a couple who truly ARE doing that. Unless they are going to some formal event..why the fancy dress? and why now are they not hiding the baby? Odd. ”

Duh. They’re out to dinner. THAT’S why they are dressed up. They’re not allowed to take their daughter to dinner now? Come on….

@ DL : Brangelina, Gwen, even Britney drag their brats around with them. Maybe its actually because they care and want to see their kids.

Really? Brad and Angelina have been seen out with Shiloh, what once? Twice possibly? That’s it. I don’t see you guys slagging Angelina off because she hasn’t taken Shiloh to the park. We’ve never seen her either.

Suri is Katie and Tom’s daughter. They are getting married this weekend and they took her out to dinner, as well as Tom’s other children. I really don’t get why you see this as a big deal or a ”parade”. Whatever they do, you people are never happy. I think Tom’s beliefs are wierd as hell, but that doesn’t make him or Katie bad parents. If they take their child out with them, you say they are parading her. If they don’t take Suri, she either doesn’t exist, or they don’t care about her. Honestly people..listen to yourselves….it’s getting beyond ridiculous now

I hope they are very happy together. Suri is a gorgeous little girl.

What the h*ll happened to that kids face?

Nothing like the magazines a couple months ago..

I think people must be blind. She’s an OK-looking baby but to say she’s beautiful or gorgeous is stretching it a bit TOO far - really. I’ve seen way cuter babies in the Sears portrait studio. And anyway, who cares?

My sister was born with a strawberry mark on her forehead like that. It is rather endearing and it went away before she was 3 years old.

I am of the opinion that the baby looks like both. She has Katie’s eyebrows and lips and Toms nose.

She will grow up to be a normal looking girl

Okay, for all of you saying Suri looks different than 4 months ago….Hello she is a baby and they change from month to month. Also about the hair cut, I have a son that was born just a few weeks after Suri and he has a lot of hair and I don’t want to cut it because, he is only 6 months old and He was born with a lot of hair and when I first seen him…his hair looked that way and it reminds me of the day he was born. I love Suri, I think she is so cute. I can’t belive you people would say someone else is baby is ugly. I am very happy for them I hope they stay together. I love the family. Can’t wait for the wedding picts.

talk about ugly kid

dean Says:

November 16th, 2006 at 3:40 pm
Suri is a normal cute baby. She does not look like the same Suri that was in VF 4 months ago.
dean says:
As much as Tom puts into looks and appearances, I am really surprised that Suri’s hair is not in a cute little clippy or something.

If you notice her hair in the back is so short it looks almost shaved. NOW DON’T BAG ON ME, it is totally normal for babys hair to do this.
I am just suggesting that maybe their stylist should trim the front of her hair so it is not so stringy and shaggy.

____________________________________

I agree she would look even cuter with a hair clip. Maybe they comb her hair down like that to try and cover the birthmark? I dont think they should though. some babies are born with strawberry birthmarks like that and they usually fade away. It is nothing to be ashamed of or try to cover up in my opinion.

Katie looks beautiful, although she doesn’t look like herself. She looks like Angie Harmon.

You guys have such imaginations. Imagining a strawberry birth mark is going a bit too far. There is not a birthmark on that baby girls face. Talk about clutching at straws.

Katie looks like she has a bump. She’s been so skinny the last couple of months, so maybe she’s preggers again?

I am surprised that all of you are not inspecting her diapers to see if she is not a he!!! What a bunch of idiots! That child will always be theirs no matter what you think. As far as I am concerned she looks so much like Tom its scarey…including the large nose…He is an extremely nurturing parent. All the time they were in London (2 yrs) Nicole was never seen with the kids..Tom was always in the park with them…as he is today…I guess its in the nature of the mob that they have to destroy…so its crush and rush to try and take down this No. 1 Actor. He will outlast all of us…Go Tom, Katie and Suri.