Top Stories

New Tom & Katie Wedding Pictures

New Tom & Katie Wedding Pictures

Here’s what looks like a mock-up (final version?) of the upcoming issue of People Magazine, out on newsstands this Friday. The cover is a new picture of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes on their wedding day, which was this past Saturday. To the right is a Good Morning America exclusive screencap from yesterday’s show, showing Tom and Katie sharing their first kiss together as an official couple. Cheers to TomKat!

tom-katie-wedding-kiss-01
tom-katie-wedding-kiss-02


JJ Links Around The Web

  • A possible D.C. Housewife crashes a White House dinner - Dlisted
  • An ambulance is called to David Hasselhoff's home again - PopEater
  • Justin Timberlake hangs out on the Social Network set - LaineyGossip
  • Zoe Saldana poses in a bikini for Details - TheSuperficial
  • Glee will make way for American Idol - Celebuzz
  • Zac Efron gets starstruck - JustJaredJr
  • Kate Hudson and Ryder check out Cirque du Soleil - PopSugar

68 Comments

# 2

That was a beautiful wedding and a big one I would of been soooo nervous but I guess when your movie stars your use to that.I wish them the best.

# 3
London BAMZS fan @ 11/21/2006 at 9:45 am

I think they make a lovely couple and wish them the best. Suri is absolutely gorge (don’t care what anyone says) :)

# 4

thanks jared for the pics, and for just wishing them well without the typical slant put on them. very sweet pics.

# 5

i hope suri will have a wonderful life!

# 6

Cheers!!! Thanks Jared…
Just lovely!

# 7

I just love this couple!

# 8

i thought there would have been more guests…seems kinda small to be a BIG Wedding.
but despite my aversion against all things scienco (well religion in general) they do look really happy together…and so i wish them well.

# 9

It is SO wonderful that to actors are able to get together for a part. They seem to be able to make it look like it’s real!

Suri will have a life filled with worldly things. The only wants she will have is for the love and affection from her mom.
MAybe someday her mom will be able to attend a church that believes in parent chaild bonding.

Package it up any way you want. This “marriage” is still fake, fake, fake.

“Package it up any way you want. This “marriage” is still fake, fake, fake. ”

YA THINK?

with ref to PAT , What right do you have to accuse Katie of not loving her daughter? No right. Just because you don’t like them does not mean that her parents do not love her. You can clearly see that Katie adores Suri. It’s very sad that many people want to tear both Katie, Tom and their beautiful baby apart. You have NO REASON and NO PROOF that Katie does not shower her daughter with love and affection.

Just because you do not like them, or think that they make bad decisions, does not mean that they are bad parents. I think that Tom has some very strange and wierd ideas, and i wouldn’t do a lot of the things he does, but this does NOT mean he does not love his daughter, nor does it mean Katie doesn’t love her daughter. It means i think some of the things they believe in are strange.

Stop being so judgemental. Just because someone has different views from you does not make them a bad person.

Katie’s dress was wonderful. They looked like they had an awesome day. I am very happy for them and wish the entire family all the best.

What a joke these two are! They claim to just want to be private and live their lives, then have 22 page baby photo shoots and release tons of wedding pictures. If you’re going to talk to the talk, you should walk the walk. Then, again, “Tomkat” and privacy are on opposite ends of the spectrum. These two jokers don’t want to live out of the spotlight, as once the cameras are turned off they have no one to pose for.

“H” the church of co$motogy does not allow a mother to bond with their babies. I have NO doubt that Katie would LOVE to have and hold HER daughter Suri, 24/7. And she’d LOVE to be able to take her out in the FRESH SoCal air when she and Tom go to the park for the weekly photo-ops!

I was NOT judging anyone, I was merly going by THEIR cult beliefs

These two are pathetic, disgusting, fake, media whoring, Xenu loving cult freaks. I think that is one People magazine I can do without.

Please explain @ 11/21/2006 at 12:00 pm

John Travolta and his wife Kelly are Scientologists and so are heck of a lot of other stars, yet Tom Cruise is the only one getting dissed. I still don’t understand why you are coming down so hard on people who don’t share your religious beliefs. I thought we had some religious tolerance in this country.

Well, i believe Katie is first and foremost a Catholic, and Tom has said in the past that you can be a Catholic and yet still hold scientological beliefs.

I don’t believe that Katie has not bonded with her child. I believe scientology believes that the baby should be in a calm atmosphere, and quiet for the first hours of it’s life. I think Hubbard actually stated to leave the baby alone for 24 hours. Whereas i don’t agree with that, it still doesn’t make these people bad parents. We don’t even know if Katie did so with Suri. Regardless, it is still possible for mother’s to bond with their babies, a day or so after giving birth.

This People Cover story will NEVER be able to catch Shiloh’s, Tom can forget it. LOL a 14 day old baby has kicked his @ss. lolol

WHAT IS SAD AS F***K IS YOU MISERABLE PEOPLE WHO CONSTANTLY TAKE SHOTS AT SURI !!! SHE IS A BABY FOR GODS SAKE . EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO THIER OWN OPINION .. SO LET ME EXPRESS MINE .
ALL OF YOU WHO TAKE THESE LOW BLOWS TO SURI , MUST HAVE F*CKED UP PARENTS WHO NEVER GAVE YOU NO LOVE OR ATTENTION .

one’ld think after all the shinanigans and build up to the wedding day which turned out to be an anti-climax there’ll be something special about the dress and ceremony but there isn’t,the ceremony from the pics looks so ordinary and plain something everybody and anybody could afford, i mean look at that hall for christ sakes apart from the two bouquets of flowers(which looks ugly and not at all special,just plain bare) there’s nothing else spectacular just same old same really guys think about it weren’t you expecting some sort of heaven after all the TOMKAT brags but then they are classless media whores with no taste also with all the hitch they had on the day they weren’t even sure they’ll be allowed to get married explains why they couldn’t dress up in the hotel and had to go to the haunted castle for that and TC arrived after the bride which shouldn’t be but as you fans say they’re SCIENOS ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

“H” No one EVER said that Katie was a “bad parent”. But the first few months are the MOST important of an infants life, it is a shame that Katie spends SO MUCH time alone shopping. She should be able to bring her daughter with her or she should stay home and take care of her.

KMILLZ you are so MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAN but htax absolutely made my day did you see the part that ays TOM KILLS OPRAH that is well HILARIOUS

“Well, i believe Katie is first and foremost a Catholic, and Tom has said in the past that you can be a Catholic and yet still hold scientological beliefs. ”

The Bible says that you cannot serve 2 masters ……….

Aww how beautiful, I guess People scored more pics of them.I can’t wait to see em!

Interesting article about the wedding:

Tom Cruise’s stunt wedding
Fiona Hudson

November 21, 2006 12:00am

THE wedding of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes has been branded a stunt after the pair admitted they got hitched days before the celebrity bash.

Critics have labelled the Italian ceremony a sham intended to promote the Church of Scientology.

Scientology weddings, which include elements such as a vow never to go to bed angry, are not legally recognised in Italy.

But the couple’s agent said they had “officialised their marriage in Los Angeles prior to their departure for Italy”.

A US gossip show yesterday said the couple would follow the Italian ceremony with a Catholic service in Los Angeles.

Bracciano Mayor Patrizia Riccioni is considering taking back the honorary citizenship she offered the couple before they wed because the small village was offended by their behaviour.

“It would have been nice for them to stop and wave,” she said.

A Catholic priest in the Italian village, Father Nicola Fiorentini, said the town felt insulted.

“It wasn’t a wedding at all. It was just for publicity,” he said.

“I can’t believe such an event was allowed to take place at all.”

The bride and groom are believed to be honeymooning in the Maldives.

It has emerged a Scientology adviser sat at every table during the reception to answer any questions guests had about the unusual ceremony.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,20792950-5006023,00.html

Scientology is a FOR-profit CULT organization, banned in many countries to be recognized as a religion.

Stop bringing up Shiloh, move on please…

Yes, this wedding is ridiculous and I am pretty sure Katie Holmes has been brainwashed. This wedding is completely fake and you are seriously lacking if you don’t see through it. The only reason this relationship is taking place is because Tom is trying to hide the fact that he is a homosexual. Everybody in Hollywood knows it. It’s really quite sad that he has gone to such measures.

London BAMZS Fan @ 11/21/2006 at 1:48 pm

hullo people, how sheltered are your lives? It was a ‘religious’ ceremony which lots of people have nowadays. e.g. I have Hindu friends who sign the civil register one day and then organise a big (Hindu) wedding do on another. Why does it have to be a ’sham wedding’ just because they officially got hitched earlier?

Over here in the Europe we usually have 2 ceremonies; the register office one (where some people wear wedding dresses to also), and the symbolic one (which is usually the big affair).

Man you guys are hysterical, and to the Haters - GET A LIFE!!!

London BAMZS Fan @ 11/21/2006 at 1:49 pm

PS. Christianity also started out as a ‘cult’ - read up on your history morons.

London BAMZS Fan @ 11/21/2006 at 1:50 pm

PPS. I’m not a Scientologist btw, just in case (hehehe). I just don’t like small mindedness and intolerance, it’s the reason there’s so much bloodshed in the world today.

PEACE OWT!

Cruise's Gerbils @ 11/21/2006 at 2:00 pm

Blech. Cruise looks like he’s having root canal.

HE’S JUST NOT THAT INTO HER.

London's an idiot @ 11/21/2006 at 2:08 pm

The Romans described Christians as a cult - Jesus and his followers did not have any interest in labelling themselves.

London's an idiot @ 11/21/2006 at 2:12 pm

Oh and another thing - calling people “morons” is not exactly showing tolerance - London must be extremely “small-minded”. Talk about a hypocrite. :-)

Pat, re: “H” No one EVER said that Katie was a “bad parent”. But the first few months are the MOST important of an infants life, it is a shame that Katie spends SO MUCH time alone shopping. She should be able to bring her daughter with her or she should stay home and take care of her.”

Come ON. Give me a break. She’s rarely seen out, and you expect her to bring Suri out all the time amongst the hundreds of photogs that follow them everywhere? You cannot seriously expect Katie to be at home with her child 24 hours a day seven days a week. Even women who are not famous still have breaks from their children. She doesn’t spend sooo much time alone shopping. We don’t see her out that often, since Suri’s birth. Besides, you really don’t know how much time Katie spends with Suri, so rather than jumping to conclusions from a few pictures, accept the fact that neither i nor you really knows what goes on behind closed doors, and stop automatically assuming the worst, - and speaking this like you are speaking facts.

I wish them a happy life together. Hear Tom is a doting father. Katie is a lucky girl.

@ Rage

How exactly did it turn out to be an anti-climax? How on earth would you know that? Did you go?

The wedding day was not for us, it was for them! A wedding day is always a special day, regardless as to where it is held, or who is part of it. It would have been spectacular for them which is what counts. Katie’s dress was absolutely gorgeous. Simple and stunning, as it seems was the ceremony.

Honestly, they get criticised for having a big wedding. Now, they’re getting criticised because they kept it simple, and it wasn’t some outlandish, spectacular, (well, what you judge as that) ‘’some sort of heaven”. They can’t win either way. If they had gone over the top, you would have said that they went too far and went over the top. Just accept the fact that they are happy, they had the wedding that THEY wanted, and that is all that matters.

They were allowed to get married, if you pay attention, they had already signed the paperwork back in L.A the week previously, because otherwise the ceremony would not have been legalised while they were in Italy. They were officially married by the paperwork in L.A, and then had the blessing of sorts, which they classed as their real wedding, in Italy this past weekend. (Which many couples do, finalise the details at home and go abroad for their big day)

Why would they have to get dressed at the hotel, when they were marrying at the castle?

And Katie arriving with Suri and her mother before Tom, what’s your deal with that? I think you’re clutching at straws now….Generally it’s the actual wedding, i.e in the church/beach/wherever you are having the wedding where the groom is waiting first. Not who is first to arrive at the area in which you are getting married. Gosh you just seem so desperate to criticise you’re picking on things that aren’t even important nor make sense.

For the record i am not a TC fan. I don’t believe in the scientology stuff and i think he has very wierd beliefs. But some people are just picking on ridiculous things. At the end of the day, it was THEIR day. As long as they are a happy family, that is all that counts.

h’s lengthy-useless-diatribe
————–
I think when they decided to invite the world into “their” day they lost the priviledge of having any privacy!

@ What’s short pointless sentence

When did i mention privacy? I don’t believe i did. I said it was their day, and they had the day they wanted, and that’s all that matters. Perhaps you should re-read.

Oh h - stop whining @ 11/21/2006 at 3:16 pm

Not worth the re-read - sorry. :-)

@ h darlin don’t get me in ur TOMKAT squabble and how did i know well honey the BBC NEWS aired it apart from what i saw they also described it as ANTI-CLIMAX and perhaps it wasn’t but all i’m implying is they both (well TC) bragged so much about it that at the end of the day no one saw anything special but a complete sham i’m sure it was special to them cos it’s their day PERIOD and honey what is it with the EPISTLE you got all that from that little comment of mine seriously you are OBSSESSED hope you are this good in your profession /academics saying i’m desperate to criticise is typical coming from you also saying at the end of your post that you are not a TC fan is sly and hypocrtical cos if you are not you wouldn’t have gone thru the pain to read my post let alone do a write up on it how long did it take you to write that uhhhh seriously get a grip and stop tripping if pple are laughing at them they brought it on themselves not my fault to Oh h - stop whining: Not worth the re-read - sorry. Absolutely correct nothing about them is worh re-read just a laugh

I wonder if that’s true about the town’s residents feeling insulted. I would have been.

@ rage

At least i can type properly, and use punctuation. I stopped reading your post halfway through as apparently, you’ve never heard of a full stop.

MEDIA WHORES.
What an exercise in complete & utter over-the-top Hollywood excess.
You probably could have fed a 3rd world nation for the cost of the (cliched) fireworks alone.
Yawn.
Next!

All you people need to be locked up in a mental ward. All this back and forth about two people who are not worth the time of day. You All need help.

“h” How do YOU know that they really got married in Los Angeles? Well, maybe that’s how others know what they now.
Katie took off to Paris for a week when her baby was supposedly 4 mos old. The ONLY reason there are always cameras around is because their peeps call and ask them to show up and take the pics!

THAT IS THE ONLY REASON! They are in the same class as Lohan and the hilton sisters, LOW CLASS MEDIA HO’s!

Okay, TomKat definately uses the media to their advantage but I wouldn’t go as far as putting them in the same category as Lohan and the Hilton sisters. And let’s not forget that most celebrities use the media, how do you think they become celebrities? I would agree that this time TomKat went way too far. They act like they’re loyalty or something. Lots of big egoes in Hollywood!

this is so funny.. my favorite part is that Tommy took his best man (the head of the Church of Scientology) to the honeymoon. At least someone will have sex!

The wedding day was not for us, it was for them! A wedding day is always a special day, regardless as to where it is held, or who is part of it. It would have been spectacular for them which is what counts. Katie’s dress was absolutely gorgeous. Simple and stunning, as it seems was the ceremony
___________________________

Honey, if you think this wedding was just FOR THEM.. you are a bit naive. We knew exactly when and where it was going to be.. we knew who was going to be there.. we know what they had for dinner the night before. We know where the are going on their honeymoon..hopefully that is all we will learn about of the honeymoon.

We have pics of the ceremony,.. we have pics of the wedding kiss. this wedding was NEVER meant to be a private affair. It is all part of Tom’s PR campaign to turn his image around to women. And it seems to be working.. some women get soo turned on and sentimental about weddings and babies etc. Tom may or may not be crazy… but no one accused him of being stupid.

millie Says:

November 21st, 2006 at 10:51 pm
this is so funny.. my favorite part is that Tommy took his best man (the head of the Church of Scientology) to the honeymoon. At least someone will have sex!

_____________________________________

ROTFLMAO!! :lol:

Love this couple ,very happy for them.

millie Says:

November 21st, 2006 at 10:51 pm
this is so funny.. my favorite part is that Tommy took his best man (the head of the Church of Scientology) to the honeymoon. At least someone will have sex!

————————————
I smell something fishy. Tom , his best man and new bride in their honeymoon ?

The wedding is all stage and PR move to show he still the powerful actor in Hollywood. How did the press knew every specific detail of his marriage including where and when will they have their honeymoon. all these news were given by Tom PR machine. but anyway, that’s a beautiful and lavish wedding, hope they last.

WELL THEN @ 11/22/2006 at 8:57 am

Tom was a better match for Jennifer Anniston than Brad! Darn it!

WELL THEN Says:

November 22nd, 2006 at 8:57 am
Tom was a better match for Jennifer Anniston than Brad! Darn it!
_______________

LMAO, So True, both are famewhore and media *****.

jq Says:

November 22nd, 2006 at 9:12 am
WELL THEN Says:

November 22nd, 2006 at 8:57 am
Tom was a better match for Jennifer Anniston than Brad! Darn it!
_______________

LMAO, So True, both are famewhore and media *****.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Now that was the best post ever!!!!

l”ll say Says:
November 22nd, 2006 at 3:26 am
Love this couple ,very happy for them.
*********

You do mean Tom and his best man, right?

LOL!

where are you people getting this best man crap from? Only that uk article is reporting this, every other report has him with Suri and their bodyguards. This report about him taking his best man to his honeymoon is pure nonsense.

And do you people know anything about weddings? they legalized papers in LA only because scientology ceremonies isnt recognized in Rome, doesnt make their ceremony a stunt or a fake. The ceremony in Rome was their only wedding. Stop coming out with these silly remarks, people do that all the time if they want to have their wedding in another country.

IF they “legalized” this shame in LA before they went to rome, then why has no one come up with a copy of the marriage license??? It is public record that ANYONE has access to.

Dont like the dress, too ordinary! KH has bad fashion taste!

according to @ 11/25/2006 at 2:40 pm

According to the Roman government, by the supposed wedding day, no such certificate of marriage was presented by Cruise or his camp. So unfortunately this is STILL a sham!!! And for those who can’t see through all this media hype…you deserve whatever hits your naive a$$es in the face down road. This man has done absolutely nothing to help anyone but himself. He screwed his ex-wife and she was classy enough to give him and his fool of a bride a wedding gift. He spends upwards to 2.5 million dollars on this farce, making sure the media nad the public know every last detail but when the tides turn against him he’ll scream “We just want our privacy!” what an a$$.

This small town rolled out the red carpet for him, going out of their way to make sure all was “just perfect” and this jacka$$ didn’t even bother to so much as wave to the crowd of well wishers. He’s never really cared about the masses in need, but now that his rep is in the sh*thole, he decides to drag his immature brat of a fiance to a black tie affair to help needy children BUT he made sure that the media was there to suck it up. People call other couples and celbrities media wh*res but ladies and gents I give you the biggest media wh*res on the planet.

And ask yourself: why this hand picked guest list. We know that Leah R. is on the payroll. But what about the others? When was the last time you actually saw Jennifer L. hanging out with TC and or KH? Brooke was humiliated by the shrimp, so why is she there? Sure she said she forgave him but I’ll tell you why. She has a reprising role on ‘Nip / Tuck’ and needs the publicity. You see it works both ways. Now on to Jada and Will. They are friends with TC but Will also has a movie coming out. Posh and Beck are plain opportunist and will show up to anything star studded.

So we know who was there, but what about those who weren’t. His best buds the Travoltas. What could have kept them away? After all JT has a fleet of jets and could have popped in and out without disturbing his schedule. His wife sure as h*ll ain’t working. Kelly gave a simple “congrats” and that was all. So why didn’t they go. Then there was the whole Oprah issue. He used her to promote his farce of a relationship, but now he doesn’t want the one person on earth who could bring with her all the publicity he could ever want at his wedding. I wonder why. While I’m not a fan of ‘Lady O’ we all know that she is one of the most powerful if not the most powerful person in the media. What didn’t he want her to know? They say he was upset about her remarks regarding his couch jumping. “BULL!” And last but not least what happened to his ‘bestfriend’ Mr. Jamie Foxx, who was invited but said no thank you. Come one people get a clue…this has all been a staged performance from the beginning, and its far from over. When will it be over? When the true scandal that caused the rift between TC and Paramount is discovered and it will be…sooner thena you think. I’ll tell you this, it’s adoozy and TC’s rep will never rebound after it comes out and he knows it.

If you don’t believe me, let me leave you with a few things why would Paramount get rid of a man who is a walking cash cow. This man has made paramount almost 3 billion dollars through out his career. lossing a few million would never cause such a rift, when weighed against that. There have been other scandals, much worse than ‘couch jumping’ and “bickering” in Paramount’s history. So why get so bent out of shape over these little minor icks? So pissed you’d cut one of HW’s most powerful men loose. When this billion dollar man was cut loose, why didn’t any of the other large production company come to his aid? Word gets around in the business and this word travelled quickly and quietly. Last but not least the head of Paramount has said some not so nice things about TC lately and he has yet to argue. We know he likes to argue, especially if he believes he’s in the right or has been wronged. So why the silent act?

You can believe what you want but know this, TC is scrambbling to build a house of stone, one that can withstand one H*LL of a natural disaster, a disaster that’s coming soon…

Katie’s wedding gown’s a blah…….expected a la Kidman stunning
gown…..so disappointed….

it was just too much for me, with all those has been A-lists. it was even fake because the church of scientology is recognized as a sect in Italy as it is in many european countries so it can’t officialize a marriage! the lavish ceremony was just too snazzy for nothing that to show off how much money they can spend on it! wish them the best though, but definitely it was much ado for nothing for me

To pat who said:

” the church of co$motogy does not allow a mother to bond with their babies.”

Do you have any proof that the church of scientology does not allow a mother to bond with their babies? Can you please show me where you read this or how you know this?

“I was NOT judging anyone, I was merly going by THEIR cult beliefs ”

Please show proof of this. Thanks.

“expected a la Kidman stunning gown…..so disappointed….”

Why does everyone keep bringing kidman into this? Didn’t she get dumped? Obviously it didn’t matter what she wore as her frizzy haired and freckeled ass got dumped regardless! Absolutely NOTHING stunning about that scarecrow so GET OVER IT!

Loserville @ 12/04/2006 at 10:02 pm

To the moron who calls himself according,

OMG dude, I can’t believe you would write this long a post about some HW person you don’t like. Why would you lose so much sleep over TC??? You’re either nuts or you’re a scorned Nicole Kidman!!!

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.