OlderSun, 03 December 2006 at 4:30 am
Cate Blanchett on Brad Pitt
“It was great to have Brad there, to have that buoyancy. Brad’s open and funny, and he makes me laugh. He makes me think about the style of a film in a way I hadn’t thought about it before. He asks questions about the script that I wouldn’t even conceive of asking. He’s a very aesthetic being, and I’m probably quite an emotional being. So for me, selfishly, he brings that out in me.” — Cate Blanchett on working with Brad Pitt on their film Babel
Share This Post:
906 Comments
be reasonable Says:
December 5th, 2006 at 2:32 pm
Tulula didn’t ask for her post to be brought to JustJared. It is possible to comment on what she wrote without bashing her.
—————————
Uh, I think you should be reasonable, ‘be reasonable.’ Tulula wrote and posted on the internet, attaching her name to her pov. That’s what happens when you post stuff like I miss the ‘OLD ANGIE’ and you have a whole fandom out there who is proud of her for not being afraid to go for hers, doing for the world, raising a beautiful family with Brad.
CLINIQUA
Maybe you should go to SoulieJolie and share your opinion of Tulula there. Or have you been banned from their forum as well?
OT - Lainey’s conspiracy theories.
Some of you were discussing Eddie Murphy’s current situation regarding a future paternity issue. Well, Lainey decided to tie an Oscar conspiracy theory to it.
As some of you remember, she attempted to link any future adoptions plans that Brad and Angelina make to a potential Oscar bid for Brad. Now she’s attempting to link Eddie’s latest hook-up and his distancing from an old hook-up and possible child as a possible way to gain Oscar momentum. I’m sorry, but her theory is a major head-scratcher.
Different approaches for the same end? I think not.
be reasonable -
how unkind of you to say something like that .
be reasonable Says:
December 5th, 2006 at 3:07 pm
CLINIQUA
Maybe you should go to SoulieJolie and share your opinion of Tulula there. Or have you been banned from their forum as well
+++++++++++++++
Now WHO is bashing WHOM?
be reasonable Says:
December 5th, 2006 at 2:32 pm
be reasonable Says:
December 5th, 2006 at 3:07 pm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Oh, I see…
You’re lecturing us for being harsh when critiquing a post and yet you made a backhanded comment when critiquing Clinique’s?
Hmmmmmm……….
be reasonable -
i dont think Cliniqua was bashing tululu at all !!! all i can see is she was just commenting on tululu’’s post.
i think tululu should step forward and clear her intent. ( in a few sentences) and NOT this long and drawn out post.
My original post did not address CLINIQUA at all. I honestly did not read any bashing of Tulula in her opinion, which is refreshing. I was addressing the other posters, too many to name, who chose to call Tulula names. CLINIQUA chose to address me for whatever reason. I responded as I saw fit.
I have been a lurker for a while reading all your post,s i am inspired with african girl missouri fan passing through or any other fan of bamzs i think angilina jolie should get a noble peace prize for all the work she has done for refugees over the year,s but now she is with brad pitt there fan base is greater than it has ever been.I live in scotland the land of the free i have been a fan of angie when i seen her in gia please e-mail me back as i would love to join the jj bamzs community please excuse any spelling mistakes as i have only been using a computer just over a year.
piper, with a low Says: December 5th, 2006 at 3:11 pm - I’ve said it before and i’ll say it again…. LAMEY is a KNOW NOTHING HAG, who loves to toot her own horn and go on and on with her ridiculous conspiracy theories…. she waits for pics to come out and then she puts her spin on it… u’ll see when the next set of BAMZS pics come out…. notice there are no pics of Angie or kids so she hasn’t had anything to say…. if she had scoop etc, regardless of pics, wouldn’t she tell “us” her exclusive…. Like i said, she knows NADA
okay….things went downhill quick fast and in a hurry…
anyhoo…is lainey on crack? how can denying your child and hooking up with the ex-wife of a music producer help eddie murphy’s oscar bid? and is anyone even considering eddie for an oscar?
I have been lurking for awhile and I must say that I have been enjoying myself until I came upon the thread where Be Reasonable made a very logical request IMO. I read previously where someone else brought that person’s thread here and I would wager that that person was just expressing their opinions to a forum that maybe shared those thoughts. I do think that it is unfair to bash that person for just sharing what was on their minds and expressing how they saw things. I am a huge AJ fan and I must say that I do not agree with all that was posted but as we are all fans should we attack one another?
BCBG, in light of the percieved tone from Cliniqua I’m sure it was just some ruffled feathers there.
Cliniqua, for the most part I absolutely love to read your post as well as some of the others. I don’t remember everyone but I do think that you are all great.
I hope I didn’t jump in an offend as I would like to participate more often. Please bare with me as this is my first attempt to enter the world of blogging. (Did I say that right?)
No one who responded to Tulula’s SJ post was bashing her, so i really don’t get where that cra*p is coming from…..
Haha..thanks for bringing that here ‘Page Six,’ I knew Oprah would get Gayle to clean that up and clear her involvement.
….and Daisy, don’t feel bad for bringing Tulula’s post here - it created great debate and I for one, am pleased to see how many people do GET AJ and don’t just cave to those former/current pseudo-fans in the face of a nice writing style. At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter how the b.s. it’s packaged - it’s still b.s.
— that was just an analogy by the way, not meant to hurt any feelings.
LOL
be reasonable Says:
Tulula (from SoulieJolie.com - on missing the “OLD ANGIE”)
She posted it on SoulieJolie, so it isn’t like she’d be surprised to get a rise out of people,,,,c’mon be reasonable
gitane Says:
December 5th, 2006 at 3:30 pm
okay….things went downhill quick fast and in a hurry…
anyhoo…is lainey on crack? how can denying your child and hooking up with the ex-wife of a music producer help eddie murphy’s oscar bid? and is anyone even considering eddie for an oscar?
+++++++++++++++++
Makes no sense to me either.. but for some reason.. there are rumors of Eddie not quite being all that heterosexual. Dont know why that matters much but some think all this press about him and two women make him seem more manly.
I have another word I would use but.. JJ wouldnt approve
:lol:
Look, whatever. Some people were being unreasonable. I called it. You people obviously can’t handle being chastised. No wonder the trolls have so much fun here.
Don’t worry. I won’t bother trying to get the best out of the bunch of you anymore. You obviously enjoy being in the mud.
did anyone see regis and kelly today? I think cate was supposed to be on. did she mention brad?
alana
i know about the rumors of his homosexuality or bisexuality. but how can lainey possibly connect that to the oscars? i wonder what we’d see if we opened up her head. nevermind. i don’t want to go there…
To bcbg, joy, alan, and piper - thanks for having my back y’all. ((hugs))
Miss ‘be reasonable,’ be Miss ‘downright nasty’ doesn’t she? lol
In answer to her question, no I haven’t (been banned). I just don’t visit that often, mainly because I find JJ much more fun and open-minded - they don’t walk around with a stick up their bum…and they aren’t dismissive of Angelina’s family (namely Brad Pitt) - they love him as she does.
Tulula writes well and I enjoyed reading her post (and the discussion that followed), but the reasoning is somewhat flawed.
First, she has crystallized Angelina as the super single woman of the years 2002-04: formidable career, humanitarian extraordinaire, great mother, adventuress, free-thinking beauty, major force on her own. But people are not fossils, they cannot be frozen in time and Angelina – as we all - is a work in progress. And relationships are a great scalpel in the carving of one’s personality,
Then, Tulula postulates Angelina as having changed (the new Angie) when she became part of an absurdly high-profile couple. But Angelina is today all she was in 2002-04, even much more so.
The only difference is the union that is more than the sum of its two halves. Was there a loss of individuality? She seems to have chosen her partner too well for that… someone with whom she feels able to be herself, only more so. And that’s the secret of being happy together.
In every union there is obviously a loss of freedom, at least the freedom to be alone. Is this a loss that could make Angelina look back in nostalgia? Hmmm… she doesn’t seem the type to lose time over inevitabilities. And, like Brad, she seems to thrive in being responsible for those she captivates.
You people obviously can’t handle being chastised.
++++++++++++++++====
Unlike yourself?
Uh?
be reasonable would you leave for that? I am just now recognizing your name but if you are here I assumed you to be a fan. I did not notice everyone attacking you or the thread that you defended and I sis say that I understood what you were trying to say. Why label everyone on this site unjustly?
Please don’t let a simple “cyber-disagreement” turn you sour.
Clooney’s pig died.
i wonder if lainey will tie this event to George’s oscar bid.
oops
I meant to say did say NOT sis say..:lol:
Pages: « 1 … 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 » Show All