Angelina Jolie on Good Morning America

ooopps … correction

I read somewhere that Brad called Angie his “missus”…

SWOON!!!!!

Thank you Jared!! At last I saw the whole first part!!
Although Diane Sawyer gets on my nerves but Angie was great!!

Rod can you please stop farting??? It stinks… :lol:

Good Morning BAMZSers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Has anyone seen this? It’s an article about what Billy O’Reilly feels (like we care) about the JP’s pics in OPeople and elsewhere…

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Even absent, O’Reilly pontificates on Pitt, Jolie, Cruise…
Reported by Chrish - December 15, 2006 - 11 comments
John Kasich subbed for Bill O’Reilly on The Factor tonight 12/14/06, but as usual the biggest head on cable pre-recorded several segments so viewers wouldn’t forget him over the long weekend. In one segment he deigned to psychoanalyze the behavior of celebrities who allow some pictures of their children to be published and of course, he is outraged. Outraged!

Of interest, introducing the segment Kasich said that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s beautiful baby Shiloh was splashed all over the tabloids today, and the graphic was of the NY Daily News and the NY Post (owned by Murdoch and frequently used as a reference to bolster - echo - a talking point.)

In the video, O’Reilly asserted that these babies should be out of the public eye, and that for the parents to “market” them for fame, fortune, publicity (yeah, Brangelina needs the money) is “just low, is it not?” His guest, Katrine Szish of US Weekly magazine, said of course exploitation would be wrong, but fans want to know details and celebs who allow a peek and then say now leave us alone…. O’Reilly interrupted and whined, they’re not going to leave them alone anyway! That’s a bogus argument.

He concluded that they - Cruise, Jolie, Pitt, et al - allow these pictures to “get people to like them - aaww, look at the cute little baby; they’re just like you and me.” It’s wrong, he insists, just wrong. Szish argued that it is bizarre, but Hollywood is a bizarre place. O’Reilly wants to know why society doesn’t say hey, knock it off, you people. O’Reilly said he loooathes the paprazzi - he hates them! They’re intrusive and dishonest.

This from a man who sent his producers after judges who handed down light sentences, going so far as to harrass a man into his garage. Another time his producer followed a tee-shirt maker down the streets for daring to make shirts listing the names (to date) of US soldiers killed in Iraq (Bush lied, they died) . If O’Reilly disapproves of you he has no problem sticking a camera in your face and barring that, he’ll use his national soapbox to call you names, call your morals into question (see above), and pass judgment on your decisions and positions.

If society DID say hey, knock it off O’Reilly would be out of a job. If society said “we don’t want to know the details of strangers’ lives,” which is essentially what he’s calling for, FOX would have to stop carrying stories of the Natalee Holloways, the Laci Petersens, the JonBenet Ramseys, (remember how much mileage they got out of that non-story?) the teens who talk back, the 14-year-olds who have had abortions - all of it. It’s none of our business and it’s wrong - just wrong. So yeah, knock it off.

Last year O’Reilly spent huge chunks of his show on whether or not people were saying Merry Christmas instead of Happy Holidays, and he called it The War on Christmas. He tried to whip up some huge public frenzy about a ridiculously trivial non-issue. Finally a NY Times columnist (I think) started taking up online donations to send O’Reilly to Darfur so that he could see some REAL problems–true story. However, O’Reilly is still on his big duff in his warm, comfy studio–as are Limbaugh and Hannity–bloviating about nothing, and trying unsuccessfully to ride the Brangelina badwagon in some form or another.

Thanks Guest Blogger (Dooby). You have done a good job this week, except for your obsession on those OC girls. Rule #1 of being a Guest Blogger, feed the hungry BAMZS fans. (just kidding-you did great)
AJ is a forthright and candid woman. She answered the questions directly and did not reveal too much information. AJ knows what she has with BP. She knows how the relationship developed and she is not ashamed of it. So much media lies and distortion have been written about the couple, that it is nice to get another perspective. She is a very intelligent and aware woman. She has done great things with her humanitarian work that the tabloid media, mainstream media and distracters try to downplay. However, I greatly admire and respect her.

See that´s what I mean…..people on TV should show more of these interviews with her.
Just to see how she really is. Shy but still outspoken to a certain degree. Very nice too.

But still there is something about the way she talks about adoption that is kinda “off”……
She shouldn´t consider adopting again out of the need to have another asian or black child for Mad and Zahara.

But oh well…..that´s just my humble opinion.

Thanks Dooby for the new Thread

that’s a lot of promoting the personal life, sorry, i meant movie. poor DeNiro, he’s smelling trouble at the box office. Rob, don’t botter, just don’t. the end is near, not too worry. she’s going to look for the next “obstacle”.

somebody has to descent. there is no objective thinking whatsoever when it comes to these two, let’s just say ———. yes, i rob and i agree with myself. did anyone ever tell you that you’re a genius?

Why Fanistons like to use man name, I mean Rob, Gus…. it’s silly :D

gus why are here?

Gus, are you gay? It’s Sunday, shouldn’t you be watching the NFL pregame shows? Why are you on a gossip board?….Unless you aren’t a man at all, but another stupid Maniston fan pretending to be male.

Original Curious, Estelle, African Girl and guli I’ve updated “Mean Boys”
http://intothegray.blogspot.com/2006/12/chapter-10.html