Oh, Danny’s Boys
Premiere Magazine has a little preview of Ocean’s 13 as Matt Damon, George Clooney, and Brad Pitt head back to Vegas — A little let down by Ocean’s Twelve? You’re not alone. “We got away from the reality and that disappointed me,” Bernie Mac says. “But this one is what Ocean’s Twelve should have been.” The original eleven return to Vegas, and theri former enemy Terrry Benedict (Andy Garcia) having butted heads with badass mogul Willie Banks (Al Pacino), comes to them for help. The crew must engineer a nine-minute period during which every gambler will win at Banks’s casino, and the plan hinges on Banks’s right-hand lady. While Thirteen explains the demise of Danny’s relationship with his wife Tess, the leader of the pack still managed to get his hands on some booty. “George kept grabbing my ass [on the set],” Mac says. “There are two things that you dont’ do to a black man: one, talk about his mama; two, grab his ass. Please tell George that.”
Brad Pitt is rumored to be re-shooting scenes for Ocean’s Thirteen soon, hence his haircut after returning to LA after his trip out to NYC with Angelina Jolie and kids.
Ocean’s 13 is set for a June 8 release. Poster below!








Older










298 Comments
Oh my I cant believe this site http://www.flickr.com/photos/jwillys/326686912/ is blocked in our office I cant open the link…. I want to see it, what site can I also find the same pics? :(
Us weekly has a new cover out this week all about Jen, Brad and Angie. How long does US weekly think that they can drag out this story. I don’t think that Brad, Angie or Jen want this. Because the editor is mad at Jen she always brings in Brad and Angie or else their is nothing else to say. I really think that all parties are over all this and the magazines keep bringing it up in hopes of sales. I am sure that none of the three want headlines like this.
Anyway I really think that US weekly does this in hopes to get bloggers talking and buying the magazine. I realize that alot of bloggers still talk about Jen look at this blog here for example a good number of the posts on the Brad site are about Jen. Honestly I sometimes think that some of the stuff they use in US is from blogs like this. Often it sounds just like what is said here.
So I really think that as bloggers we need to stop this triangle here. On all sites whenever you see Brad and Angie Jen’s name is mentioned all the time. Really I don’t think that their names should be mentioned together. Why would someone discuss jennifer on a Brad site anymore? I don’t get it. What good does it do? I really think that US weekly scans the blogs and realizes that so many bloggers still connect the three together and think that that is what people want to hear about so they write about it. For example if you looked at this site with all the talk about jennifer even if it is negative, you would assume that jennifer is still a very talked about part of the brad/Angie triangle. This keeps the triangle going. I really believe that if all bloggers stopped connecting these three people some of this crazy magazine stuff would stop as US weekly uses bloggers as their way to figure out what people like to hear about.
On the US weekly site there is always huge arguments with multiple posts whenever posts come up about jennifer/Brad or Angie. always arguing about these three and the past. With so many posts I am sure they think that these are hot topics and then they write about them.
Anyway sorry for the long post. But something to think about. Maybe as bloggers we can stop this by not brining up and arguing about these people anymore.
Notice how the most posts on the US web page always makes it to the cover. EG britney, etc. If no one posts the magazine thinks that no one cares and doesn’t run the story? Maybe we should try it and see. Do hundresds of posts on some entry and see if US weekly then rus a larger story? Just a thought.
ANGIE WRITTEN UP AS ‘POWERFUL & INFLUENTIAL’:
QUOTES:
Powerful and influential women such as Oprah Winfrey, Angelina Jolie and Martha Stewart are all said to be big donors and rich women. These women know how to draw wealth to themselves and plenty of it. Oprah Winfrey is best known for her hit television talk show that airs daily on national television. Martha Stewart is known for her amazing television cooking shows and the Martha Stewart Living daily television program. Angelina Jolie is of course known for her acting in popular movies.
All of them seem to have money. They are all giving and powerful in what they do. They are known to be top experts in their areas.
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=18146
Sarah Silverman and Jimmy Kimmel MAKE A GREAT COUPLE!!!
THEIR SO CUTE
Thanks for the new thread Jared. Can’t wait to see this movie in the summer.
BTW, the CR interview was incredible. I wish it was shown before that LK interview, at an earlier time. CR could give LK some lessons on hosting this type of program. Can’t wait to see TGS. I haven’t gone to see so many adult movies in a long time, as it’s usually children’s movies. Now, I tell my husband that since I became such a big fan of B&A, it means that we have to go see it on opening weekend, and not wait for the video. LOL
I have a suggestion that we put justjared link in sites where they like to say bad things about Brad and Angie, instead of trying to argue, let’s say Angie and Brad’s fans should come to this site and find out more about them for people who are interested in the truth. A lot of people don’t like the lies that are written up about them on other sites, yet the sites get the hits for the to and fro arguments and probably we can stop the triangle this way.
http://img157.imageshack.us/my.php?image=star122506pitaau8.jpg
Not sure I believe that Angie actually said all this since this is STAR mag.
GREAT IDEA!
…………………
truth Says:
December 19th, 2006 at 8:14 pm
I have a suggestion that we put justjared link in sites where they like to say bad things about Brad and Angie, instead of trying to argue, let’s say Angie and Brad’s fans should come to this site and find out more about them for people who are interested in the truth. A lot of people don’t like the lies that are written up about them on other sites, yet the sites get the hits for the to and fro arguments and probably we can stop the triangle this way.
Ughhhh! Just got home, turned on the TV and it happened to beThe Insider and they asking Matt Damon how the love scene was with AJ. Goodness, it that all the movie was about? I mean if it was an X-Rated movie….I’ll understand this strange facination with the love scene. Poor Bobby D, he tried to make a movie about a very heavy subject and all everyone can ask about is the love scene.
Here’s the Important Question
“Did Brad give you any advice..threaten you or anything?”
MD Laughs “Yeah….here’s how to kiss my wife”
Okay…they interviewing Matt Damon right…why in the world are they bringing up AJ’s past and how she’s changed? SOMEBODY PLEASE TELL ME WHY?!!! I don’t have a problem with AJ’s post….but bringing it up during an interview with another star? Come on! This is ridiculous.
Okay….Breath in, Breath out. I may have to throw my TV out the window if this continues.
That star magazine is something else…now they are trying to start a fight between brad and courtney!!
http://sammie323.blogspot.com/
In the new Time magazine, The Good Sheperd is one of the 10 best movies of 2006!
” The Good Sheperd: Maybe, as the famous whifenpoof song would have it, the sons of Wasp privilege are just lost lambs. But since some of them spent their post-graduate years founding the CIA, Robert De Niro’s finely tuned film wonders if their arrogant sense of entitlement subverted this naton’s best, most idealistic impulses. Good question, good movie: very dark, very well written and acted - and very, very worrying.”
Anna Says:
December 19th, 2006 at 8:20 pm
GREAT IDEA!
…………………
truth Says:
December 19th, 2006 at 8:14 pm
I have a suggestion that we put justjared link in sites where they like to say bad things about Brad and Angie, instead of trying to argue, let’s say Angie and Brad’s fans should come to this site and find out more about them for people who are interested in the truth. A lot of people don’t like the lies that are written up about them on other sites, yet the sites get the hits for the to and fro arguments and probably we can stop the triangle this way
————————————–
Or, it could bring a lot of haters here and the to-ing and fro-ing would continue. Right now I’m kind of liking the relative quietness of JJs without the haters. A lot of BA fans already know about JJs as we’re public Enemy #1 with the haters.
It has its pros and cons, but I was happy when I found this site since I got sick of all the lies out there. I’m open to new suggestions.
Cliniqua:
The Jazz Center is not on Lincoln center - it is part of the Lincoln center theater, which is located at the new Time Warner building overlooking Central Park on Columbus circle….
Shoot! I lost my post….too tired to write another one.
Truth
I love that idea….yeah instead of Bamzs fans giving the crappy websites more hit, we divert it to JJ. BRILLIANT!!! :clap:
Mrs. Smith Says:
December 19th, 2006 at 8:09 pm
——————————————
I agree with you Mrs. Smith. I didn’t have the chance to see LK interview firsthand since it was airing too late here where I live but I read the transcript that AG posted on the previews thread and it was a mayor disappointment. What the hell this man was thinking about?? The interview was supposed to be part of the promotion of the movie. He kept asking and asking all those very personal questions. Their ages, how many kids do they have, the sex of their kids, their health…WTF?? I was wondering why he didn’t ask their height or something.. :lol:
And as for Angie she did really great. Just answering all those stupid questions fast and straight to the point. How many times do they have to ask the wedding question and even bring a Tabloid rumour to the table?? I didn’t know journalist and especially in LK league had OK! Star or Life & Style on their desks :lol:. Even DS interview was more about the movie. LK was a waste of time. He barely asked questions about the main subject. Just showing a few clips it doesn’t save anything. I really can not understand why the Journalists and in a wide percentage the Media can not do their job properly any more. Why do they have to sensationalize everything?? Why all this misinformation and misguidance??
On the other hand I saw a brief clip of CR’s interview on youtube.com and the difference was so obvious. He focused on the movie and the whole discussion was very interesting and informative about CIA and the movie it’s self. I hope I can see the whole interview soon.
On another note: Alexanderina-I know you are packing right now but I just wanted to wish you a safe trip to England and have a wonderful time with your family. Our thoughts will be with you. Be safe and we will catch up with you when you return!! :)
Who said Z can’t walk?
http://img157.imageshack.us/my.php?image=star122506pitcgb6.jpg
thanks bunch of loonies to the link. I just saw some haters buzzling that Z can’t walk. want to slap this to their face! :)
OMG. We’re back to the ‘triangle’ again??!! Where all 3 parties are once again entertwined, and people can ‘choose teams?’ Hey Janice Min, I know you like socking it to Maniston and Huvane since they made you look a damn fool with the wedding story on National TV, but is it possible for you to rip Maniston without putting Brad & Ange in the mix.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
the only reason we are back at the triangle is because Angelina was way toooo open in her interview, and thats why sometimes i wish she could follow the PR aprouch, she talked about things that happened in 2004 (she fell for Brad).
if she only had talked about her new life as mom and her new movie, the tabloids wouldnt have material, i love her but sometimes i wish she could keep some personal stuffs for herself. i really dont understand how this interview could help her image, it only made things worse. If she continue to be so open and let the inteviewer ask her anything, this break up still will be a topic five years from now, so i hope nexxt year she shut up.
Hey C, the link gave me nothing. :( what am I doing wrong?
Melissa Says:
December 19th, 2006 at 8:44 pm
OMG. We’re back to the ‘triangle’ again??!! Where all 3 parties are once again entertwined, and people can ‘choose teams?’ Hey Janice Min, I know you like socking it to Maniston and Huvane since they made you look a damn fool with the wedding story on National TV, but is it possible for you to rip Maniston without putting Brad & Ange in the mix.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
the only reason we are back at the triangle is because Angelina was way toooo open in her interview, and thats why sometimes i wish she could follow the PR aprouch, she talked about things that happened in 2004 (she fell for Brad).
if she only had talked about her new life as mom and her new movie, the tabloids wouldnt have material, i love her but sometimes i wish she could keep some personal stuffs for herself. i really dont understand how this interview could help her image, it only made things worse. If she continue to be so open and let the inteviewer ask her anything, this break up still will be a topic five years from now, so i hope nexxt year she shut up.
+++++++
I disagree with you. Angie said her side of story, and it is done now. She doesn’t need to coment on it any more. It was expected that in her first interview she would be asked these questions - she said it, so there is no need for those questions to be asked again.
Quote for Askmen.com
71% The Good Shepherd
The cast is stellar, the visuals are stunning… and Angelina Jolie is still smoking hot.
Melissa Says:
December 19th, 2006 at 8:44 pm
juligan is that you bitching again?
Melissa Says:
December 19th, 2006 at 8:44 pm
OMG. We’re back to the ‘triangle’ again??!! Where all 3 parties are once again entertwined, and people can ‘choose teams?’ Hey Janice Min, I know you like socking it to Maniston and Huvane since they made you look a damn fool with the wedding story on National TV, but is it possible for you to rip Maniston without putting Brad & Ange in the mix.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
the only reason we are back at the triangle is because Angelina was way toooo open in her interview, and thats why sometimes i wish she could follow the PR aprouch, she talked about things that happened in 2004 (she fell for Brad).
if she only had talked about her new life as mom and her new movie, the tabloids wouldnt have material, i love her but sometimes i wish she could keep some personal stuffs for herself. i really dont understand how this interview could help her image, it only made things worse. If she continue to be so open and let the inteviewer ask her anything, this break up still will be a topic five years from now, so i hope nexxt year she shut up.
__________________________________________________________________
Actually, whether Angie gave the interview or not, the magazines are still going to connect the triangle either way. They will milk it until people are bored of reading it and it doesn’t sell. I loved the interview Angie did and I applaud her for not being afraid to tell her side of things no matter what. Her image is only damaged to the same people who never sided with her or liked her in the first place and who always criticized her. I like that she is controversial and is not some conventional type of person. Even though some people keep on saying that the Vogue interview will hurt her career, I don’t think it will at all. She will be all right, both personally and professionally. I never want her to stop talking ever because I enjoy reading her interviews and listening to her on the televised interviews.
Melissa Says: December 19th, 2006 at 8:44 pm - well, she said this last nite to LK, she has waaay too much going on her life to care what the world thinks/says about her and her family. She doesn’t give a cr*p.
GC looks much older than his two cohorts.
His second beauty crown was sooo undeserved. :)
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 … 12 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!