Top Stories

Brad & Angelina’s Pictures in Cambodia

Brad & Angelina’s Pictures in Cambodia

Here are some pictures of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie at MCCC (Maddox Chivan Children’s Center), a center in Cambodia named after their son, Maddox Jolie-Pitt. The MCCC provides a unique program of multidisciplinary care for Cambodian children infected and affected by HIV/AIDS. Also pictured below: Marie-Pierre Fernandez, director of the MCCC, and co-founder of the CHC (Cambodian Health Committee) Anne Goldfeld, and a child who currently attends the MCCC. Find out how you can donate here

Other pictures include Angie from Vogue’s January 2007 issue…

brad-angelina-cambodia-01.jpg
brad-angelina-cambodia-02.jpg
brad-angelina-cambodia-03.jpg
brad-angelina-cambodia-04.jpg
brad-angelina-cambodia-05.jpg
brad-angelina-cambodia-06.jpg
brad-angelina-cambodia-07.jpg
brad-angelina-cambodia-08.jpg


JJ Links Around The Web

  • ANTM's Miss J is the co-father of a 7-year-old boy - Dlisted
  • Nicole Richie and Harlow grab coffee - PopSugar
  • Tracy Morgan fans didn't like his strong language - PopEater
  • Twilight tops People's Choice nominations - JustJaredJr
  • Britney Spears is a bikini babe - TheSuperficial
  • Holly Madison's not a Girls Next Door fan - Celebuzz
  • Emily Blunt and John Krasinski are adorable together - LaineyGossip
Photo: Amy Sussman/Getty

795 Comments

Pages: « 123 24 25 [26] 27 28 2932 » Show All
dumb bitch @ 12/21/2006 at 7:14 pm

ritzygal Says:
December 21st, 2006 at 6:41 pm

FYI:

A little birdie told me today that B.W. has made a PRELIMINARY (I repeat, PRELIMINARY) inquiry to Guagenti to see if Brad AND Angelina will sit for a JOINT interview for her Oscar night special.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

dumb bitch @ 12/21/2006 at 7:15 pm

ritzygal Says:
December 21st, 2006 at 6:41 pm

FYI:

A little birdie told me today that B.W. has made a PRELIMINARY (I repeat, PRELIMINARY) inquiry to Guagenti to see if Brad AND Angelina will sit for a JOINT interview for her Oscar night special.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

go **** yourself :)

anyone familiar with BW pre oscar interview? Are there sometimes celebs on the show who are not being considered for oscar? seems i remember this being the case but it has been many years since i watched one of those programs.

Hello everyone. I have to go now but will come back and read the rest of the messages for today.

LOVE BAMZS and thanks JJ.

piper, with a low Says:
December 21st, 2006 at 6:28 pm

I, for one, will not watch Larry King; I am through with him, after watching his disgraceful interview with the cast of TGS. And I am not in the mood to looking at DT’s pelican-looking puss. I watched him popping off on Inside Edition about Rosie O’Donnell. He killed me when he said that Rosie was a bully; she is, as she proved during the Tom Selleck interview and her attack on Star Jones, but in this instance, she wasn’t bullying Donald Trump.

He engaged the press in a sanctamonious, stilted manner, talking about second chances, as if he’s Father Christmas, with a tabby cat sleeping on top of his head. That press conference warranted comment; his position endorsing second chances when he turns up his nose at women who turned their second chance into something brillant deserves comment. He defined Rosie as a bully because she didn’t respond to his latest attacks, that bullies turn tail and run when they get socked in the nose… WRONG!!

In my experience, bullies are those who attack without provocation and engage in a campaign of insults, taunts, and even physical attacks. The shooters at Columbine were bullies; wife/husband/child beaters are bullies; criminals are bullies; Donald Trump, Michael Douglas and Danny Bonaduce are bullies. PERIOD!!!
____________________________________________________________________

ITA. Great post

fifi Says:

December 21st, 2006 at 11:26 am
This may bother some people about Angie’s pill comment — The thought of Brad and Angie ******* like rabbits. Now that is where I envy her the most!!! he he he! LOL! Imagine doing *it* with Brad all the time … whenever …. wherever … whew! I need a cold shower! Calm down, me, that is Shiloh’s dad!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Now you know X was frigid. Did you see Brad’s pic? full monty and all” How did X stay away from “it” wink, I meant, Him for more than one day, let alone months.
Now, X is sitting alone in her home, blaming everyone else for her mistakes.
You had “it”, did not know what to do with “it”, Guess what? our girl Angie has “it”, appreciate “it” ,and she is doing it and doing it and doing it…..OK. I need to stop now.

leni Says:

December 21st, 2006 at 7:15 pm
anyone familiar with BW pre oscar interview? Are there sometimes celebs on the show who are not being considered for oscar? seems i remember this being the case but it has been many years since i watched one of those programs.
=================

I don’t watch every year, but the few times I did, she had actors on that didn’t win. I don’t remember if there were non nominated ones or not. Personally, I don’t think B or A would appear on that show. They don’t need the publicity. BW didn’t even get them to interview for her Ten Most Fascinating. Instead, she had to use old clips.

CLINIQUA Says:

December 21st, 2006 at 6:32 pm
lindsey Says:

December 21st, 2006 at 6:10 pm
angelina says she’s had two beautiful marraiges, but she feels the need to get married at all. Huh so BBT she felt she should commit to, but Brad Not so much?
http://img73.imageshack.us/my.php?image=hello03bv0.jpg
—————————————

Let me explain something to you…

AJ, was lost — and always searching for ‘meaning’ in her life, the ’symbolic’ back then was very important to her…as she felt whether it was tattooing someone’s name on her skin, shedding her blood, or having a ‘ceremony’ and binding things up all legal — it gave her the security she was looking for, the more things she could do…whether it was writing someone’s name in blood on her T-shirt in a ceremony, or climbing Billy on the red carpet while wearing his name on her arm…those ’symbolic’ things she did, hoping to become secure in her union….this is not too difficult to understand or comprehend when you know she was abandoned and left at 6 mos, by the most influential man a woman has in her life - her Dad…then watched her mother cry over him for most of her young adulthood, and never get over him.

It would indeed create the kind of restless, scared young girl who felt worried that she would never ‘feel’ that kind of strong emotional bind and so would cut, and bleed, and marry, and have ceremonies, and do all kinds of over-the-top things as well as everything she could do to try and achieve that bond that she feared she would never FEEL…… (marrying a lot, is but one of those things she tried to do - she has since said, she ‘knows now she married friends.’)…

THAT SAID –

It makes PERFECT SENSE, than when she finds the ‘love of her life,’ a man that she “knows she can count on,” that she knows will be there for her and her children…fear of abandonment…fear of losing that love…or not feeling it….all goes away….and her way of thinking is, there is NOTHING that could make her MORE committed, more in love, more secure, and/or more dedicated…certainly NOT a piece of paper that she’s already filled out twice before.

In a way, it’s a beautiful thing.

In other words, THAT to them is secondary, it’s no big deal — as lindsey said, ’she doesn’t feel the need.’ Not that they’re saying they never will, but the need to bond together legally, can’t surpass or be tighter than the bond and committment they’ve already shown each other.

This is a man, whom she has given her children.

Doing what Britney did with K-fed is not going to legitimize them or make them more ‘married’ than what they’ve been since summer of 2005.
*********************************************************************

Brilliant summation CLINIQUA.
cheers.

I also loved your response Think Positive :)

BTW, no Christmas tree shopping pictures this year, JJ? :lol:

ritzygal -

i doubt if you have inside info. in fact, you come here to get info because you know we are the one who searches the net. you come here because you know this is your one stop shop. i remember sometime around september, around the time of toronto film fest, you said, “you guys make my job easier”. you should be thankful that we do the work for you , that we are the one who searched the net for links, pics, articles, etc.

this is the season to be giving, peace etc. so be gracious and appreciative. and by the way, stop changing your name to little spark, and have guts to own your posts.

I also pray for the Jolie/Pitt family everyday.

Ameema Says:

Guess what? our girl Angie has “it”, appreciate “it” ,and she is doing it and doing it and doing it…..OK. I need to stop now.

lol.. :) lucky lucky Angie.

Hey ritzygal…. when are we going to hear you spill the beans about what Cindy Adams supposedly whispered about Brad?????? supposedly negative things according to you.. and all we read from her column was postives….

care to share?

coalharbourqt @ 12/21/2006 at 7:45 pm

Lola - I’m with you - so tired of the bashers who can’t handle that BAMZS challenges their ideal of the “perfect Nuclear Family” that they cling on to for dear life. This is the new Global Family of the future people, and BAMZS are here to stay!

Thanks you guys for keeping the politics out of it - BAMZS has fans internationally who are on here and really don’t want to read through a run down of American politics that we are all familiar with anyway. Let’s keep focused on what this family stands for and fight all the negativity together. Brad and Ang have shown an openness to people of all races, religions and politics so their thread should reflect that too (and it certainly seems to for the most part!) I know it’s hard to sit mum on a subject when you feel strongly about it though :-)

To “Little Spark - I think it goes without saying that most, if not all, BAMZS supporters are well versed about and active supporters of organizations such as one.org, makepovertyhistory.org, worldvision.org, UNICEF, and the various JP foundations that are set up. Why do you think we admire and support them so? There are plenty of attractive couples in Hollywood, but a rare few who are as focused on making this WORLD a better place, as they are. I think it goes without saying that we are also involved on a local level with food banks etc. as well. Just because we don’t feel the need to brag about our contributions on an ongoing basis does not mean that we aren’t doing anything.

The cynics accuse AJ of getting involved in humanitarian causes and adopting Mad to “revamp” her “failing” image and career and they couldn’t be more wrong. Anyone who has travelled to an area of the world that is still suffering from abject poverty and sees families living in tin shacks with dirt floors by the side of the road is forever changed - I know I was! It was a life altering experience and all that energy that was being diverted into self-destructive tendences was re-routed into a positive channel. AJ has had the same experience and I can relate to her in that sense.

I also recall an interview of Bono from U2 a few years ago in which he mentioned that BP had called him up and invited him over for dinner to discuss how he could become more involved with aid in Africa - this was when BP WAS STILL WITH X! So BP was already beginning his humanitarian efforts BEFORE AJ was even in the picture. I’m sure it is a large part of why they grew to love each other - they are like-minded in their drive to shed light on a number of different issues.

I notice a couple of people on here wondering about why AJ & BP have chosen not to adopt a child from the US and I believe it has a lot to do with wanting to bring attention to the atrocious living conditions of orphans in other parts of the world. Yes, there are orphans in the US too - many of them are likely living in orphanages or with foster parents etc. in DECENT living conditions. They are NOT living in orphanages with dirt floors and dying of malnutrition, malaria, or AIDS. Which of course is not to say that orphans in the US (or other developed nations) don’t deserve to be loved and adopted - they ALL do. But when you have seen the living conditions that Maddox and Zahara were living in, you understand the choice the AJ & BP made.

So those are some of my thoughs on BAMZS and why I support them. I noticed some of you on here who have been here for a while but get tired of the negativity and I just wanted to let you know that you have an educated, informed supporter in your ranks! :-) Most of the naysayers are on other sites (you know which ones) and they like to wander over to try and rile you up and bait you - just ignore them. They aren’t worth your time or emotional energy - negativity only begets more negativity. WE are ALL angels in our own rights and so are BAMZS!! Don’t forget to make your charitable contribution this month (locally and/or internationally) and have a VERY MERRY CHRISTMAS!!! PEACE AND LOVE TO ALL.

Observer2 @ 12/21/2006 at 7:49 pm

Ditzygal;

A little bird told me you’re full of shite. I could’ve guessed that she’d ask them to be on her Oscar night special. She had them on her MFP special.

But, if you like talking to birds, I’ve got one for you.

The only person that ever got Brad and Angie from the start was Joan Colins. She said it was true love and Brad’s ex underestimated the power of children in his life.

Mrs. Smith @ 12/21/2006 at 7:59 pm

Think Positive….ITA….being great friends with your partner/husband is a big plus in any relationship. When Angie talks about their road trips, biking in the desert, sharing these types of adventures, you know they enjoy doing things together, other than just having hot sex. (Although I would have loved to hear about the hot sex too!!!)

GRACE…I’ve also noticed that most women who are fans of Angie, are women who are strong, independent women, the go-getters.

Thanks Jared for the lovely picx.
BTW, did anyone notice that the Vogue mag does not have that pic of Angie in the white suit, stepping into the plane. I saw it on one of the earlier threads but it’s definitely not in the mag because I looked on every page. I wonder what happened to it.

One more present to buy and I’m done! Whew!

truth Says:
December 21st, 2006 at 7:52 pm

The only person that ever got Brad and Angie from the start was Joan Colins. She said it was true love and Brad’s ex underestimated the power of children in his life.

yep and One More Joan Colins .. quote. Jennifer said Brad was not the love of her life.
You can’t keep a Man and say that.

While messy divorces aren’t uncommon in Hollywood, Hawke never makes disparaging remarks about his gorgeous ex. “She’s my children’s mother. You have to keep that above anything else.” Spoken like a true gentleman. You hear that,

NYCGalnVA @ 12/21/2006 at 8:02 pm

^^ Hey Truth Says……That was her sister “Jackie Collins” that gt Brad & Angie right.

coalharbourqt Says:

December 21st, 2006 at 7:45 pm
———————————————-
Well Said, great post. Thank you.

Just to add regarding adoption in the US. Firstly: It is so difficult for a “couple” to adopt here in the US and it more so or impossible for a “single” person to adopt a child here in the US. That is why so many people are looking outside the States for adoption. There are so many bureaucracy levels of requirements, that most of the people are just so discouraged and finally gave up.
2ndly, Angie did said that she did not see a “border” on adopting a child…. Like coalharbourqt said to bring attention to the world of the area that need attention and the child here in the states are still better off than most of the children in the poorest countries in the worlds.

NYCGalnVA @ 12/21/2006 at 8:05 pm

Jackie Collins was on the View and a few other Entertainment shows and said Brad & Angie had true true love….

yes it was Jackie Collins.

Thanks for the correction.

As I see it @ 12/21/2006 at 8:09 pm

Olene Says:

December 21st, 2006 at 7:13 pm
The Real Tita. Thank you , i did not know she was giving stateside too, i thought only abroad. Because i beleive charity starts at home.

++++

Always strange to me about the charity begins at home thing. When you think on charity you think of those in need, but when someone is told where they should help it kinda takes the idea and turns it into something not so charitable. It tells me that the person given is not doing so from the heart since a geography criteria must be met first. Just saying

Pages: « 123 24 25 [26] 27 28 2932 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.