Brad & Angelina’s Pictures in Cambodia
Here are some pictures of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie at MCCC (Maddox Chivan Children’s Center), a center in Cambodia named after their son, Maddox Jolie-Pitt. The MCCC provides a unique program of multidisciplinary care for Cambodian children infected and affected by HIV/AIDS. Also pictured below: Marie-Pierre Fernandez, director of the MCCC, and co-founder of the CHC (Cambodian Health Committee) Anne Goldfeld, and a child who currently attends the MCCC. Find out how you can donate here…
Other pictures include Angie from Vogue’s January 2007 issue…








Older










795 Comments
RE: Trump
Sorry guys no offence meant to women or gays, im also a woman and i have a lot of gay friends, what i meant is that women/girls and gays, would normally say stuff such as ugly, fat, or thin, or whatever bad physical characteristics when we talk about people we dont like but not generally “real” men. You know, women/gays care and talk more about beauty and appearance, but not men, although there are more and more vain guys now but not necessarily bitchy as DT. They would probably say those things among themselves(all men) but not with other women and most especially not in front of national TV. Its only DT who is such a ***** (and maybe Howard Stern, but he does it for his radio show) and i think its just rude and very ungentleman.
Joy Says:
December 22nd, 2006 at 11:29 am
lookwhaticando Says:
========================
Thank You Joy, I feel the exact same way, I love Jolie not only for her acting ability, but for her heart of gold, She looks at people not for what they have, what they look like, the color of their skin, religious, etc.. but for what theyare inside. And I see Brad as being the same way. I do respect others opinions and ideas, I am not in any way, rattled at what fion said, I just wanted to understand the meaning behind the statement. I can only hope it was not meant in a discriminatory way. I am also so a black woman. Who sees each individual as that, a indivisual. I love/like people for their heart and mind set. The world is a better place because of Angelina Jolie, and though she is younger than I am, I have learned a lot from her on many levels, I wish not only more people, but the world had the loving and giving qualities as Angie
BTW, I am from VA to, Northern Va, about 10 minutes from DC.
Merry Christmas
OT:i’m watching De Niro right now @ Live w Regis & Kelly
new thread alert
and the reviews for TGS is not that bad..it’s B!…
here’s the link http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1808716032/info
fiona Says:
December 22nd, 2006 at 11:57 am
RE: Trump
Sorry guys no offence meant to women or gays, im also a woman and i have a lot of gay friends, what i meant is that women/girls and gays, would normally say stuff such as ugly, fat, or thin, or whatever bad physical characteristics when we talk about people we dont like but not generally “real” men. You know, women/gays care and talk more about beauty and appearance, but not men, although there are more and more vain guys now but not necessarily bitchy as DT. They would probably say those things among themselves(all men) but not with other women and most especially not in front of national TV. Its only DT who is such a ***** (and maybe Howard Stern, but he does it for his radio show) and i think its just rude and very ungentleman.
=================================
Hey Fion, I feel that you did/do not mean any harm. And I do know that “Some” gay men can be a bit catty at times, when it comes to looks. I am a black women, and not “All” of us Gays are mean spirted. I know that I am not, nor are any of my friends, or they would not be my friends, and I have friens from all walks of life, White, Latin, Striaht, gay, men and women, etc,,, etc… I just don like blanket statements about any particular group of people. At any rate, They are letting us leave work early today, Need to do some last minute shopping,,
Merry Christmas, and Happy New Year
The stalwart supporting cast includes Billy Crudup as a British KGB mole, John Turturro, Joe Pesci, John Hurt, Alec Baldwin, Timothy Hutton and De Niro himself as the four-star general who sets up the CIA as an old boys’ network for Yalies, but admits to profound misgivings the film obviously shares: counterespionage is at best a necessary evil. One character suggests that’s only half true — that the Cold War was a politically expedient sham.
Angelina Jolie stands out because she’s allowed to express the emotions the men have buried inside them, but in a strange way Wilson has closer relationships with two Soviet spies: a defector, Mironov (John Sessions), and his KGB opposite number, Siyanko, codename Ulysses (Oleg Stefan).
Perhaps “The Good Shepherd’s” discreet tone occasionally works against its possibilities; a couple of shoot-outs and a chase scene or two might have been welcome. But it’s the patient delineation of sympathetic adversaries and untrustworthy friends that makes this such a thoroughly engrossing picture. “The Good Shepherd” does not lack for power.
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Movies/12/22/review.shepherd/
***POST ON THE NEW TOPIC***
Thanks Janet, BeeLoved, Original Curious and Too Long for the kudos re: my post. I have never really posted re BAMZS before primarily because sites that shall remain unnamed (*cough* perezhilton , etc. *cough) always had so many snarky posters who won’t listen to anything positive about this family and whose best comeback would be something like “shut up sh*thead” (hereafter called the “you’re a poophead” comeback). The “you’re a poophead” comeback seemed vaguely familiar and I was trying to think of where I heard them before and finally realized….I heard them in the school playground in kindergarten :P Anyway, I can’t remember how I finally found this site (took me a while to figure out what “JJ” a poster on another site was referencing) but I’m glad I found y’all since even though you may disagree on things, you have better responses to posts than “you’re a poophead.”
“Questioning my fan status” I agree with others’ responses that you may be taking our favorite couple too seriously. Sure people like me love them to pieces but no need to undergo serious faith crises on their behalf. Although the world may be a bit darker if these two don’t work out, I don’t think the earth will stop spinning–at least I don’t think it will….a big asteroid may hit the earth and wipe us all out though (j/k) As for this observation:
**************
Questioning my fan status Says:
December 22nd, 2006 at 4:09 am
One question was how comitted are these two to each other. Every serious relationship they have had, it seems like they jumped into head first. They give those relationships their all and in a matter of few years, they all come to an end. Angelina stated that she realized JLM and BBT were her friends, not the love of her lives after she separated for them. She talked about both of them so lovingly when she was with them. Even then, she mentioned that she wanted to spend the rest of her life with each of them respectively. Now, I read Angelina talking about her love for Brad and I wonder, is this true? I do think they are in love but how does Angelina know she is in a relationship with her love, not a friend whom she shares common interests with and love for their children.
************************
This situation is not all that unique to Angelina or Brad. Most people go through several relationships before they settle down. Most people will also tell you that during each or at least most of those “failed” relationships, they believed themselves “in love” and really thought it will last. Some people will say that they must have been wrong when they thought themselves in love during those past relationships. I don’t think this is the case with most people though. At 18, I believe I was in love with my first boyfriend and the fact that we didn’t end up together forever does not diminish that. My idea of love at 18 years old is not the same as my idea of love now at 28 and most likely when I’m 50, I will look back and realize that my concept of love has changed 10 times in the past 20 years. As we grow older, our concept of love evolves to reflect our shifting priorities and values when it comes to relationships so no one should criticize/judge/doubt other people’s commitment to their current partner based on how many relationships they’ve had before and on the those people’s fervent belief during their past relationships that they were truly in love. Isn’t one of the most often asked question–”how did you know that your partner was ‘the one’”? As far as I know, relationships don’t come with a guarantee and so the question of how does Angelina know her love for Brad is “true” is really a no-win and unfair question.
CLINIQUA and Lola’s rendition or otherwise short essay’s on all that’s unique and complex about Jolie is true – except for when you continue to assert, The critics are disillusioned…., Critics are baffled…., The critics’ problem with Angelina…., Similarly, to critics, it is impossible that….In a way, the critics are very limited in the way they want to view the world.
This repetitive language may be persuasive and dazzling to the naïve, but not to someone with half a clue. I’m not a critic, just someone who simply lives in reality. I agree with what your saying about Jolie – I can agree when it comes to the different facets of an individual and I can disagree when it comes to how my views have changed regarding Jolie’s integrity and truthfulness. Jolie’s statements don’t even fall into the category of “truthiness” – she just blatantly lies. And yes, it was a shock when the veil lifted and I was propelled into REALITY. It doesn’t mean that I don’t like her – it just means I see her in a different light. Again, the point is her hypocrisy - because at one time I did believe she copped to all her sh*t, but it’s apparent she’s not doing that by her continual blatant lies. She’d be a tad less full of crap if she’d just cop to the sh*t she pulled on the set of M&MS because it makes her statements ludicrous. Statements such as (paraphrasing) : “I’d never be with a married man…I couldn’t look at myself in the morning..” “ That (cheating) behaviour is so disgusting to me I could barely shoot the scene..” “ We kind of just became a pair..” The way in which she has chosen to be incredibly righteous and sanctimonious about cheating and sleeping with married men – is the exact opposite of her actions. It’s the very REASON why it’s so disappointing. No Lola, it’s you who has a very limited and uneducated view – and I’ll just address one little part of your lengthy rendition because it goes to show how y’all talk out your ass and have little concept of reality. Your statement:
“For example, to the critics, its unfathomable how a person who makes a living out of the glamorous Hollywood can be so at home in some of the most seemingly desolate places in the world pursuing charity work. They would rather believe that Angelina has ulterior motives rather than believe that a person is capable of straddling both worlds comfortably. “
This statement tells me you haven’t traveled outside your realm of the dream world that’s dissecting celebrities lives and talking as though you know them, as opposed to offering an opinion about them. If you’ve done any kind of traveling at all to any of those “most seemingly desolate places in the world” you would know that ANYONE would feel at home and very comfortable in those places – it’s NOT difficult to be stunned and inspired by people who experience unspeakable suffering – and Jolie has asserted that herself. People fortunate enough to travel to those “most seemingly desolate places in the world” feel very insignificant and are forever changed. Do you understand the paradox? You stated the “critics” - “Rather than to believe a person is capable of straddling both worlds comfortably.” Huh? Um, no I believe a person is capable of straddling both worlds comfortablly because WE are the insignificant ones when we travel to the “most seemingly desolate places in the world.” It’s not a mystery, nor is it uncomfortable or difficult (especially for someone like Jolie, who has millions and goes back to her 5 star hotel after the photo op.) Those people in the “most seemingly desolate places in the world” without effort make you feel at home and comfortable. They are giving and they are giving and they are giving. So, why do you think it would it be difficult or such a feat or an accomplishment or heroic to “straddle both worlds comfortably?” I don’t understand how that makes sense – because even if you haven’t traveled, surely you’d have the sense to understand it wouldn’t be difficult for Jolie or anyone with millions of dollars to travel to and offer hands on help to people in remote corners of the world.
LittleSpark
Come on. Reread your post to Lola. You’re babelling. The point of your post is puzzleling. You’re saying Angelina lies. What is your proof? Lola was only speaking of her impression with regards to how the critics have written about Angelina. The majority of celebrities haven’t worked nearly as hard as Angelina and critics seem to write about her dubiously and cynically because they’ve concluded what you have about the reason for her humanitarian work…..MMS and cheating. Only the reliable facts are appropriate when drawing conclusions. No assumptions are necessary.
So much anger LittleSpark! My observations wasn’t a response to anyone in particular. Why are you so riled up? Statements like ” talk out your ass and have little concept of reality” and assumptions like “you haven’t traveled outside your realm of the dream world that’s dissecting celebrities lives and talking as though you know them, as opposed to offering an opinion about them.” That’s a lot of venom, especially towards someone you’ve never met.
Let me tell you how off base you are. I was born and raised in a country that many people call “third world” but am now living in a country that probably owns half of the world’s riches. As a child, I have seen fellow children scavenge through landfills to help their family eat, went to school with children who lived in shacks made of junk pieces of wood and iron, had known neighbors who died of the illnesses that where I live now could have been cured with a single prescription, have known personally what it’s like to be hungry for days and to forego basic care that is otherwise to expensive to pay for. So please don’t presume to know what I’ve seen or what I experience or what I understand about poverty. I’ve traveled the world several times over and have seen rich and poor alike. Sorry to burst your bubble.
As for the straddling the two worlds comment, apparently you read that wrong too. I wasn’t painting it as heroic that people can be comfortable in desolate places. I was saying that a person that can fit in in Hollywood doesn’t necessarily mean that when they go to poverty-stricken places that their help and work there are not sincere. I am saying that it IS possible for celebrities to pursue charity work not because they think it will help their image or want to generate positive PR but because they truly care and want to make a difference. This observation was addressing those who think that Angelina’s work abroad is only a major effort to overhaul her image and nothing more. What I was saying was that contrary to this belief, you CAN be part of a rich and glamorous world AND have a caring heart. The point is Angelina being a famous actress is not mutually exclusive with being a sincere ambassador of good work.
Okay enough now…there’s a new thread :P
cook Says:
December 22nd, 2006 at 2:42 pm
LittleSpark
Come on. Reread your post to Lola. You’re babelling. The point of your post is puzzleling. You’re saying Angelina lies. What is your proof? Lola was only speaking of her impression with regards to how the critics have written about Angelina. The majority of celebrities haven’t worked nearly as hard as Angelina and critics seem to write about her dubiously and cynically because they’ve concluded what you have about the reason for her humanitarian work…..MMS and cheating. Only the reliable facts are appropriate when drawing conclusions. No assumptions are necessary.
********************
Lol–at least cook got my point :)
Little spark is obsessed!LMAO!Honey it’s almost 2007,let it go!
Love Angelina.
As usual “little Spark” is a former poster on previous threads of Angelina. Anew name, same person. The clue…”riiight”
Dear Jen: Coming in 3rd place ain’t so bad, is it? After all, you just won a bronze medal! Do you know how many people would kill for a bronze medal? To be a mere mortal and, for a short time, to have basked in the glow of an earthly Adonis? Hey, I’m not Greek and even I can appreciate that. Chin up, girl. Zeus has spoken, the God goes with the Goddess and the homely girl goes with the pudgy funny guy. The Force is in balance once again.
I love that quote from Lainey. Does this mean JA is really a loser? She could not even keep VV.
Sometime around their 4th year together, they’ll get around to having their permitted sexual encounters with others, but one will eventually get jealous (most likely Brad jealous of Angie). She’ll get irritated by his controlling, jealous behavior and leave. . They’ll stay committed to their kids and get back together a few more times. It’ll be on and off, and in the end, in their final interviews they’ll both declare each other as their one “true love”, but made each other too crazy to be together. And the world is balanced again.
Thanks for your fan fiction jez. You got one vivid imagination. You are freaky just like those idiotic fanistons! Well it is typical for haters & fanistons to think that way. It runs in their blood & their tiny teeny brain they got.
hello everyone I’ve been having technical difficulties on my keyboard so I’ve been lurking, can’t find comment/reply feature on the Costa Rica thread, where is eveybody?????????????????
Hope everyone had a happy holiday.
how awesome they are angie is so cute and brad seems very happy between all these poor childrem but they are so so so so awesomeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!
Pages: « 1 … 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!