Angelina Jolie’s In-Depth Interview

If you haven’t already, you really need to read this Angelina Jolie interview published on Page G1 of the Dec. 22 issue of the Philippine Daily Inquirer. It’s one of the most in-depth looks into Angie’s life… Here’s an excerpt:

As I’m looking at you from the side, you and Brad could be brother and sister. Well, thank God we’re not (laughter).

Even in your voice and the way you respond to questions. Oh, no. Really?

Do you think your relationship is based on the fact that you are alike? You know, it’s funny. When we first came together, everybody commented on how different we were. So now it’s funny to hear somebody comment on how similar we are. Oh my God, I think you’ve scared me into thinking we’re starting to be that couple that morphs (starts looking like each other). We are very different in many ways — certainly in the way he is at home and the way I am at home. But we balance each other quite well.

Read the full interview after the jump! Pictures include: Angelina Jolie posing next to the film poster Beyond Borders (2003) at the Ziegfeld Theater.

angelina-jolie-interview-01.jpg
angelina-jolie-interview-02.jpg
angelina-jolie-interview-03.jpg
angelina-jolie-interview-04.jpg



Angelina Jolie - Philippine Daily Inquirer Interview

We haven’t talked to you in almost two years. Can you recap the high points in your personal journey in the last couple of years? The high points are the obvious. My coming together with Brad; Brad and Maddox coming together; and Zahara coming into our family. The low or scarier point was when Zahara got sick. Her surviving that was a high point. My having a baby (Shiloh) and now her personality is coming out—it’s fun. It’s great to see all three kids together.

On a professional level, this film was wonderful to work on. That I’ll be working a lot less and spending a lot more time at home was a welcome decision at the end of the day.

And you have been going on these missions for the UN. I’ve been working for the UN for five years now. I have been involved with projects in Cambodia for four years. I’m still pushing for different bills in Washington and they haven’t gone through. We have a new Congress. Maybe they will (pass those bills).

I’m trying to educate myself more to be able to handle discussions on issues better and not just be emotional about them. I would try to actually deal with them on a stronger level and make some changes.

As I’m looking at you from the side, you and Brad could be brother and sister. Well, thank God we’re not (laughter).

Even in your voice and the way you respond to questions. Oh, no. Really?

Do you think your relationship is based on the fact that you are alike? You know, it’s funny. When we first came together, everybody commented on how different we were. So now it’s funny to hear somebody comment on how similar we are. Oh my God, I think you’ve scared me into thinking we’re starting to be that couple that morphs (starts looking like each other). We are very different in many ways — certainly in the way he is at home and the way I am at home. But we balance each other quite well.

Can you give an example of how different you are? He’s very methodical and takes time with things. I’m very impulsive like on a decision we made yesterday. But (when we travel), he packs at the last minute while I pack three days ahead with all the kids’ stuff and five different things. I like to organize each moment of our travel but he likes to be more (spontaneous). But we appreciate each other. We need it. I need to be not so crazy about things.

How are you going to spend the holidays? We’re going somewhere this Christmas. We’ll spend the morning with our children, have a wonderful time with them and make it special for them and not forget that. We’re going to spend the day with some other people, bring them some things, listen and talk to them. I want to teach my kids that it’s not about what they’re going to get but it’s about who they’re going to think of, what they’re going to do, what they’re going to learn and who they are going to extend kindness to. The season is a good excuse to teach our children something really nice.

Spiritually, are Brad and you on the same page?
Yes, I would say that. We’re not of any one faith ourselves but we are teaching the children about different faiths. We believe (in teaching them about) that. We believe that you should understand and learn about all the different faiths. Then teach your children and see where they fall and celebrate many different things. I suppose that is a unique thing to be very much in agreement on.

Do you have any respite from the paparazzi at all? We were just recently in our home in Cambodia and nobody was there. So there are ways and there are places (where there are no paparazzi). We also went to Brad’s parents’ house for about five days. That was lovely and quiet. Hopefully in the years to come, maybe if we work less, we’ll have more of a quiet life. Then our kids will have a more normal life. We just try not to let it (the paparazzi issue) affect us. It only does when we want the kids to have more freedom but other than that, we try to ignore it. There are worse problems so we’re OK.

Would you like to get married again? I have had two beautiful marriages (first to British actor Johnny Lee Miller and then to American actor Billy Bob Thornton) in my life. I don’t feel a need to get married at all at this moment. But I am committed to another person (Brad) and three children. I think that’s the most important. For people who want to be married, it’s a beautiful thing. It’s a wonderful thing and I’m all for it.

How much do you enjoy flying your own plane? I love it. It certainly gives me a freedom that I don’t have on the ground. Flying is a real skill. I know that sounds odd but I have spent my whole life with a job that is kind of odd. I interpret behavior, tell stories and I emote—those are not practical skills. So it was really wonderful for me as a woman and as a person to go back to school, take tests, study and learn a proper physical skill I can expand on. Hopefully one day, I would be able to give service as a pilot.

How often do you fly? I flew until I was about six and a half months pregnant. And then I wasn’t allowed to fly anymore. I flew about two months after Shiloh was born. I fly whenever I can. I haven’t been able to fly recently but probably I’ll fly in January and February.

Which of your movies made the most impact on you personally? I think everything does one way or the other. The funniest and probably the truest example is “Lara Croft: Tomb Raider” because it was about other countries. It was about being physically strong, fit and focused. So it got me healthy and let me travel to Cambodia. Cambodia changed my life. The next film let me travel to Africa. So in working with local people, you learn about these countries not just as a tourist. But I would say that Cambodia was the most significant one. Learning about land mines and refugees and the history of a country I knew very little about changed me and made me start to question. That was really the beginning of me questioning things.

Has being famous hindered or blocked your desire to help in many countries? It has been the best use of my celebrity. When I was younger, I didn’t know quite what to do with my celebrity status. You don’t really do interviews to talk about other topics. You haven’t come to many conclusions. You don’t have a lot to say. So to find a purpose in my life really helped me. I wake up and I don’t think about meaningless little things that I am worried about for myself. I’m able to focus outward and that is just a healthier way to live. Certainly the position I’m in has made it very easy for me to be able to meet with officials, get briefings and do things quicker. That’s an even exchange. The negative side of it is your credibility is questioned. A lot of people are out to make a very silly story when you’re trying to focus on something else or question why you do things. That’s to be expected.

Is it more difficult to be a mother of a boy or of girls? I don’t know. They’re very different. My boy was my first baby so that was hard. Perhaps when they’re teenagers, I’d say it’s harder to be a mother of a girl or I’d be more nervous about the girls going on dates than about the boy. That’s when it comes back at us. They’re interesting, crazy and wild in their own ways.

My son is very close to me. I don’t know if that’s because we were alone for a long time. I can see a little bit of a difference between a mother and son and between a daddy and his girls. It’s quite interesting. On giving birth to a child or adopting a child, I honestly did expect that there would be a different feeling. I was very concerned that there would be and I prepared for that. There was absolutely none. Other than sometimes I look at Shiloh and I see Brad—that’s sweet—I don’t feel any differently. That was a wonderful surprise. I was so happy to have Shiloh in Africa, that we could do that and for her to have a Namibian passport. She has that connection to another country and to her sister’s part of the world. I think that ties them together a little.

It must be easier now to have somebody around to help with the kids. It’s easier to be with somebody. But it’s better to be single if you’re with the wrong person (laughter). There were so many times with Mad when he was growing up that I’d be up in the middle of the night, exhausted, rocking him. Nobody was there—except for friends—who saw me exhausted, who appreciated my efforts. Nobody was there whom I could look at or explode in excitement with when Mad said his first word. That was a bit sad. It made me very close to Mad but there’s the joy now of waking up in the middle of the night, like last night, and looking at the other exhausted parent, sharing the burden and learning, smiling about a child’s new tooth and just enjoying children. As a woman, having a partner who appreciates you as a mom, who remembers your history with your children is special.

Even though I had Maddox, I didn’t have a family somehow. I have a very small family myself. Brad has a wonderful way—he really does invest in our daily life together. He makes the most of every single moment whereas I tend to move very quickly through things. So he slowed me down to really enjoy this time. That’s probably the greatest gift and what I love about him. I think I expected a lot of things when I met him. I didn’t know anything about him as a man except what you all write (laughing). I found a really kind, funny, down-to-earth man. Just a wonderful man that you usually expect in a different package. He is who he is in the world but at home he is a really wonderful friend and father.

Can you talk some more about how Brad has taught you to slow down and enjoy life? If I want to go on some trip because I want to have an adventure, explore and learn something, he’ll make sure that we have enough days to just be with our kids or we do something special with the family. He reminds me that it’s OK to take a deep breath, sit down, enjoy life, not race through it and let it go past you. He’s been very good for me in that aspect.

After the controversy of Madonna adopting a child, the cynical reaction from media was that some celebrities are “buying” babies. Did that hurt the chances of some babies being adopted? I hope not. I hope people are smart enough to understand that it was a very specific situation of a country that didn’t have foreign adoption (policy). So it’s a very specific legal situation. I hope everybody wishes the best for that little boy and his new life. Again, it’s the negative and positive media. It’s good for media to question whether there’s something at play that you need to understand or may not be right. Then there are people who decide to run stories in the most negative way possible just to sell magazines.

I was working in India and I didn’t go out of my way to study everything about it (Madonna’s adoption of a boy issue). I don’t know a lot about that country (Malawi). I have not been there. I have gotten lists of counties to adopt from and that country has never been on those lists. I believe that anybody who adopts a child has that commitment to that child for the rest of his life. There’s got to be some love in that situation. I don’t think it’s fair to just look at it in a negative way. We have to hope that’s the best for that little boy.

You grew up in a show business environment. Do you think your children will follow the same path? Strangely enough, because I didn’t live with my father (actor John Voight), I didn’t go to a bunch of film sets and things like that. But I did grow up in Hollywood and somewhat around that. What I am trying to give to my children—and it’s the one thing I didn’t have—is at least half a year, if not more, in a foreign country. On occasion, they’ve been on film sets. They’re around this stuff every once in a while but they really spend the majority of their lives not around this (Hollywood). I am trying to give them balance, like with Mad, he came to work with me in India and he played with the local kids. He hung out at the local places and he didn’t live a Hollywood life during that time.

It was the same case when we were in Africa. I am glad I can bring Mad to these foreign countries and he’s not looking for a Nintendo and a hotel room. He’s happy to go to some neighbor’s house that’s very modest and just play outside with rocks. So I hope with that balance, I’ll instill in the children something that’s more than just wanting to be in this business. But if they want to, God help us, we will let them (laughter).

Where is home for you? We don’t actually know. We have a lot of our stuff in Los Angeles but we’re looking for a home outside of that. We just went back to Cambodia which I consider home.

How was your experience working with Robert De Niro as director? On the set, Bob was so great to work with. When I first met him, somebody said to me, “Look, he doesn’t like to talk a lot. He’ll probably talk to you for five minutes.” We talked for almost two hours because we ended up talking about world affairs. He’s not a casual person.

Please comment on—first, how you look different in this movie because of your blonde hair. And second, how everybody talks about your beauty. (On the first question), that certainly makes me feel good. I have always seen myself as different looking. In “The Good Shepherd,” I had to go quite WASP-y whereas I am more ethnic looking. It’s easier for me to go darker than lighter and my character was quite light. (On the second question), I have gotten used to myself, my face. I don’t think of myself one way or another—kind of beautiful or ugly. I look like my mom and so that’s nice to me (laughing).

In portraying a woman, wife and mother from the 1930s and 1940s, what are some of the differences from your own experience living today? Many things. It wasn’t just the 30s and through. On top of it, she’s married to the CIA. She’s unable to express her independence. That was probably the hardest thing. She could not even have an improvised fight. How far could I (her character) take an aggressive attack or an insult? I always had to stay in my place and there wasn’t anywhere to go.

It was not possible (for my character) to say, “I’m leaving,” “I want a divorce,” “I want this” or “I want this for my child.” It was very claustrophobic in that marriage. It was very hard for me as an actress to do that, to make myself less opinionated, powerful and strong. On a funnier note, I was sent to manners classes—for lessons on how to hold a cup of tea, to cross my legs the right way and to tilt my head a little and listen. It was funny that the natural way we hold ourselves today as women is not as gracious and elegant as the women of that time.

That element of the film was lost on my character who was just drinking and ignoring it. But in my life, that element is there, even when it’s just going out with the kids or where I go. Or plans for the holidays or even trying to figure out anything really. When I was pregnant and I just wanted to go to my doctor’s appointments, I had to try to find some way to get there without people following me. All that felt very uncomfortable, to be honest. But it’s just a part of this business.

What do you think is the message of this film? To be honest, I’ve not seen the film yet so I don’t know which pieces were taken out or put in and how exactly it was told. I know that Bob’s intention was—and he probably says it better—not to give a specific, this-is-what-you-should-be-questioning element or feeling. Bob’s aim was to show people and situations. It’s up to the moviegoers to read into them.

My personal feeling on the political nature of the film is, it is always important to question your government and what it is doing, not just blindly trusting that it’s going to make the right decisions, and if it’s being moral or not. I think now is no exception. This is a time when we must be questioning, as we all are, the decisions of our current administration regarding foreign policy and so forth.

Will you and Brad do a sequel of “Mr. and Mrs. Smith” or perhaps another movie? There was talk at one point about another one of those but it would just be too weird since it would be so much our life (laughter). It would be like a home documentary. They said, “No, we’ll make another one and you’ll have children” and we thought, “Oh, good” (laughter). We’d love to work together on something but it’s tricky when you’re a couple and the world knows it. The movie should be a comedy. It’s easier for people who are in a relationship to have fun with each other, take shots at each other, than take each other seriously. Nothing has come across us yet, though.

With your career, family and UN work, how do you juggle all of them? Brad says I’m obsessive with schedule (laughing). I’m very fortunate to have him in my life. He’s a great father—really dedicated. We take turns working and we both love being with our kids. It’s a decision we made so it’s something we’ve wanted to do.

You must get exhausted from all your commitments. I love everything that I do. I love to work for the UN and in film. I relax with Brad and my kids. We do get exhausted like normal parents but we love it. If we plan to have a very large family, we shouldn’t stretch it out over the next 10 years or else we’ll be raising kids forever. So we’ve thought about it. I am sure we won’t wait forever to build our family.

So will you adopt again sooner than later? I think so, yeah.

In “Alexander” and “The Good Shepherd,” you played older women. How do you feel about aging? I’m looking very much forward to growing older. I want to be an exhausted older woman but with a very full life behind me and one still going. As an actress, they tell you things like don’t look this way or don’t age. Somebody even gave me advice not to play older women. To me, it has always been about the story and the character. Clover, my character in “The Good Shepherd,” was such an interesting woman. I loved the challenge of how she broke down and aged. Personally, I like to see age on faces.

959 Comments

Pages: « 126 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 » Show All
Nonbeliever @ 12/29/2006 at 2:01 pm

“Julia Roberts Expecting Baby No. 3″

Say what you will of how she and her husband got together. Julia Roberts is America’s Sweetheart. Not Jennifer Aniston, not any other blonde airhead out there trying to match Julia’s box office power. She will always have the hearts of America supporting her. I am not a fan myself. And I do not care for that label but I have no doubt that what she has is what Jennifer Aniston wants and can not have. She is 39 years old and is having her third child. She has the package that the fanistons wanted with Jennifer Aniston and never or will ever get. I seriously doubt anyone out there believes the sweetheart tag in relation to Jennifer Aniston. Her career is dead in the water.

Awwww..just saw the pics…AJ looks cute with her little rounded tum…although I think that’s less of a ’rounded tum’ and more of an arched back - it’s the way she’s standing folks.

To all those saying Angie shouldn’t have answered the JA ?….. for the past 2 yrs she said NOTHING, but every fr*gging wk, L&S, Out a Touch, US and Star Mag, had her saying all kind of sh8t, so what difference would it have made…. she said her piece and thats that… end of story

By the way people, I am a BAMZSer.

Eid Tsum Sretah @ 12/29/2006 at 2:06 pm

please Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 1:47 pm
==============================

Keep grasping at straws FATSO.

You dumb ugly delusional *****.

dragonfly @ 12/29/2006 at 2:06 pm

panama pic Says:

December 29th, 2006 at 1:55 pm
# please Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 1:47 pm

Take note haters..Angelina is doing something Brad likes. Meaning spending an hour looking at stetches of buildings. Haters always say Brad follows Angelina around. Here we can see Angelina doing something she would have never done if Brad had not been in her life.
************************************

Yes, Panama Pic, I am sooooo glad this “please” person knows what Brad and Angie do every single minute of the day that she knows just how deprived poor Brad is of his own free will….. Well “please”, Brad is a grown up, powerful man. He doesn’t do anything with anyone that he doesn’t want to. “please” and her/his ilk are gonna be so ’shame when Brad gets up on the Oscar podium and says how much he loves Angie. I cannot wait! haha!!

================

she needs to throw him a bone at least once in a while or else she will lose her “good friend” who’s sole purpose is to help her out with the kids.

********************************************************************
lol, ok believe what you need to believe to get you through the day jennifer.

dragonfly @ 12/29/2006 at 2:08 pm

Shoot…. my remarks are in the middle of that last post……

Andrómeda @ 12/29/2006 at 2:09 pm

Nice pictures of Brad and Angie in Panama….I hope JJ put htem here too. I want to see more pics.

Chanel Says:

December 29th, 2006 at 1:58 pm
Denise I agree with lyou. Angie should have made it clear that the subject of Jennifer Aniston was off limits, and that she would not answer any questions on her. It is too touchy a subject ….
***************************************************
I totally disagree, how long should the subject be off limit ? Forever ???
That stupid, pathetic JA should just get a grip och get over it, move on for god sake !

You never know @ 12/29/2006 at 2:09 pm

I think angelina look wonderful in the two panama pics we have. she had a baby 7 months ago… that’s just her natural belly…i think. maybe she is pg?

I wonder how many degrees that back of hers get when they do the thang :twisted:

PeopleMag Says:

December 29th, 2006 at 1:57 pm
Does anyone knows if there is a Jan 1, 2007 issue of People and who is the cover? It seems to me that they didnt come out with a new issue and we are now getting the Jan 8 2007 new issue of Half their Size. Which means they were really cashing in on the Dec 25 B&A issue since they were selling it for 2 weeks, so they probably had them printed twice or thrice.

++++++++

The dec 25 issue was a double end of the year issue.. they do this every year I think. Skipping a week during the holidays.

CLINIQUA Says:

December 29th, 2006 at 1:48 pm
GALA: Can you define love?
Pitt: The term love changes meaning when one gets older. When I was 13 years old and I had my first girlfriend, I thought that I was in love with her. But not until today I understand, what is important . The better I get to know the woman, whom I love, the more I understand, what is important to her and what for us as a team (partners). I have never better, have never been happier than today. In order that remains in this way, one should always be creative in love.
——————————————–

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!! WOW, who else besides me takes thes above quote from Bradley as a complete and utter dismissal of all that have come before Angelina?! If you don’t, you’d better. Because THAT is what it is - though it’s couched very diplomatically and said as only a true gentleman would. He’s telling you that whatever he felt before AJ was kid stuff baby.

I love the ‘when I was 13 I thought I was in love too,’ line (Paltrow, Maniston, Lewis, etc. - he’s talkin’ to all ya’ll mickey mouse fools..muahaha!) - then followed by, but not until today do I know what is important…. (

888888888888888888

calm yourself girlfriend. most of these quotes were from his time with jennifer. they have spliced together some old stuff with a couple of factoids about AMH.

seing that your an expert on all things brangelina, i’m shocked…SHOCKED you didn’t know that. muahahahahahaha or whatever the hell you say.

WTF?… I applaud your post. Brad and Angie do not have to live their lives tiptoeing around Manistons feelings. Hell, she is not the only woman in the world who have gotten a divorce.

1) Have you ever thought that Brad and Jen’s marriage cant be salvaged? Think about it, there were cracks in the marriage before Angie came along. Have you ever read those past magazine interviews ?They were apart for much of the year in 2003? She was busy making the movie “Along came Polly” in addition to taping FRIENDS. He was out of the country for much of the year filming Troy and O12. Brad and Jen got married, grew apart !!!! He wanted kids. She pretended to want kids. In fact, she wants Oscar. Did you see her speech on the stage when she accepted the Emmy ?

2) Regarding your comment on “having a moment”, why is this unusual? Have you ever had very young children? Think about that, she has 3 very young children. Z and Shiloh are still very young. It’s a hand full. Kids that young can be having a tantrum. They cant express themselves in words. You cant reason with them. Their crying and “having a moment” can drive any young mother crazy. But this “crazy” is not the same as mentally unstable. ( I say this just in case you try to exploit this. ) True, she has nannies. But she is so hands on that I believe she uses the nannies to the minimum. I still remember when my children were so young ( they are only 14 months apart), I was so overwhelmed that at times I needed to run and hide. As for Angie , where can she go? The photogs are everywhere. Ask any mother, they will tell you they all have the same feeling. I dont find this as “odd behavior”.

3) Regarding the “trust”, she does trust Brad as can be seen from the rest of the interview. One does not have to have 100% trust to be classified as in a stable relationship. Also the word “trust” could be interpreted in many ways. She did not specify what aspect. So dont speculate. The trust could mean “I still have to learn to take care of myself” because anything could happen. It doesnt have to be divorce. It could be anything. I am married to a physician, yet I still cant trust my husband, not because of him leaving me, but because he may go to heaven sooner than I want. Therefore, I cant trust anything or him to take care of me for the rest of my life. Hence, I still maintain my professional license, just in case I have to stand on my feet. So stop this speculating !!!!.

dragonfly @ 12/29/2006 at 2:15 pm

I Says:

December 29th, 2006 at 2:09 pm
Chanel Says:

December 29th, 2006 at 1:58 pm
Denise I agree with lyou. Angie should have made it clear that the subject of Jennifer Aniston was off limits, and that she would not answer any questions on her. It is too touchy a subject ….
***************************************************
I totally disagree, how long should the subject be off limit ? Forever ???
That stupid, pathetic JA should just get a grip och get over it, move on for god sake !
********************************************

I don’t have an opinion one way or another about whether or not she should have answered the question or not, but I will say that he response is typical AJ…..she faces things head on like she always has. She doesn’t hide behind quotes taken from her friends in an attempt to make others look bad. It’s not her style. It’s also one of the things I am sure Brad loves about her.

African Girl @ 12/29/2006 at 2:16 pm

jamie Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 1:26 pm
Awww….Jaime, thanks for the article. People keep saying they never express thier love for each other. Please…that article was almost a love letter to AJ and this is why BP does not need to have his tongue down AJ throat in public. A few chosen words will do just fine.

panama pic @ 12/29/2006 at 2:16 pm

# I Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 2:09 pm

Chanel Says:

December 29th, 2006 at 1:58 pm
Denise I agree with lyou. Angie should have made it clear that the subject of Jennifer Aniston was off limits, and that she would not answer any questions on her. It is too touchy a subject ….
***************************************************
I totally disagree, how long should the subject be off limit ? Forever ???
That stupid, pathetic JA should just get a grip och get over it, move on for god sake !
___________________________________________________

Yes this whole thing involves Angelina too, not just Jennifer. Angie has every right to talk about it if she wants to. She has been just as affected by the triangle.

You never know @ 12/29/2006 at 2:16 pm

Angelina has every right to try to defend herself. I don’t know how she went as long as she did without talking. Some people go on Oprah to clear up rumors, ya know?

Original jpf @ 12/29/2006 at 2:17 pm

African Girl Says: December 29th, 2006 at 1:53 pm

Original jpf

Oooooh, you said Dead alongside JA’s name. You’re gonna get the blog police on you so fast….she’s gonna say you wished JA dead. I see you point though, it is quite perplexing that people don’t take time to read the interview before jumping the gun. Anyone with common sense knows that’s not what AJ meant. I am just glad she doesn’t read the tabloids because she will be an emotiona wreck right now.

^^^

AG, I wouldn’t have had one problem if JA hadn’t been mentioned, but she was, and I think AJ was simply being AJ by answering honestly. She’s not the one who brought up the subject.

“Of course, the elephant in the room here with us is Jennifer Aniston. When I finally find the nerve to ask if they have ever talked or met, Jolie says, at first, no. But then, a minute later, she interrupts me. “But . . . so . . . you asked if I have ever met Jennifer and I said no. I did, but it was not a proper meeting. We’ve, like, passed each other and said hi briefly, shook hands. But not a real sit-down-and-talk kind of meeting.”

Do you imagine that happening at some point?

“That would be her decision, and I would welcome it.”

That’s it! That’s all there was to it, and somehow it’s become more twisted than a night in TomKat’s bed! She was asked a question, and gave a ten/10 word answer that has set it off a stink like rotten eggs.

jpf

Observer2 @ 12/29/2006 at 2:17 pm

That Gala quote from Brad is from 1998 during his MJB press tour, it’s not recent.

As for Angelina not answering about Aniston. Whereas, Aniston lets the elephant in the room, Angelina escorts it from the room by not making it an issue. You see the difference? Aniston makes it an issue, Angelina doesn’t. Who wins that one? Angelina.

lurker opinion @ 12/29/2006 at 2:19 pm

PeopleMag Says:

December 29th, 2006 at 1:57 pm
—–
I think the mag with Brad and Angelina on the cover was a double year end issue. Yes the increased the price just like when the new pics of Shiloh came out in People.

Original jpf @ 12/29/2006 at 2:21 pm

Ok, question…

We have two/2 Chanel’s now? One is “Chanel” and the other is “((((chanel)))” right?

jpf

If Angie refused to comment on JA, people would have said she was hiding something.

African Girl @ 12/29/2006 at 2:24 pm

guli Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 1:58 pm
Hey Guli….I am so sorry I made you relive that. Out of respect to you and Elena, I am not going to use this as a basis for a stupid argument….Let the ignorant loony fan carry on with her tirade. Anyone with brains can tell what horrible people the Fanistons are. Again, I apologize…i wish we still had the flag button.

Observer2 Says:

December 29th, 2006 at 2:17 pm
That Gala quote from Brad is from 1998 during his MJB press tour, it’s not recent.

As for Angelina not answering about Aniston. Whereas, Aniston lets the elephant in the room, Angelina escorts it from the room by not making it an issue. You see the difference? Aniston makes it an issue, Angelina doesn’t. Who wins that one? Angelina.

++++++++++++++++++++

Excellent point!!

African Girl @ 12/29/2006 at 2:33 pm

Original jpf Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 2:17 pm
You know what….I didn’t remember the exact quote but I was sure AJ didn’t mention her. Now that I have re-read it…I am flipping mad. What part of that quote says AJ will like to meet her?

Question - Do you imagine that happening at some point?
Answer - “That would be her decision, and I would welcome it.

How else could she have answered the question?

Question - Do you imagine that happening at some point?
Answer - No comment

Or

Question - Do you imagine that happening at some point?
Answer - I don’t want to discuss it.

Can you imagine the headlines….Jolie afraid to mee Aniston” Jolie feels guilty, refuses to meet Aniston” Honestly, only an IDIOT will fault AJ for saying what she said.

Maniston per Liz Smith/ritzygal should not even dream of getting an attitude with Angie, after all her VF piece mentioned Angelina throughout, she herself commented on AJ, she had the goddesses comment on her, Leslie Bennetts threw in her slurs, and BAM! we were off to the races. Maniston has gall to even go there…”grapevine” or no.

Rather than being infuriated with the ‘would you meet with her business?’ I tend to think that one little blurb in the tabloid story ‘How Dare She!’ lolol — (’In Touch’ I believe - which I scanned in the last thread or thread before last) has more of chance of being true — it said Maniston was angered by Jolie characterizing ‘her relationship with Brad as more of a ‘friendship.’ If you’ll recall in Vogue, AJ was sayings he didn’t know much about Brad in the beginning except that he was ‘with his best friend whom he loved and respected.’ Ahahahaha.

Now sure, if you were a self-conscious embittered as h*ll b*tch, like Man, you might take AJ’s remark as a diss…but I’m sure AJ was just speaking truth to power. Plus, Brad I’m sure, is the ONLY one who gave AJ an impression/perception of his relationship to Maniston at that time. AJ just didn’t create that out of thin air- so it stands to reason, Maniston’s beef should be with Brad for apparently letting AJ know the nature and basis of his relationship with Man.

Brad is the one, who faced with getting hit by the thunderbolt and “enchanted” by AJ, may have wanted to communicate to her - the basis on how and why he and Man came together, i.e., we were FRIENDS. THAT, would be pretty telling.

Everyone knows, in love and relationships, you can have a comfortable old sock of a relationship…and you can have mind blowing passion and devotion. I think we can very safely say, Maniston was THE SOCK in Brad’s life. She’s mad because she perceives Angie is telling the world that she is THE SOCK.

I think Maniston knows, that maybe Brad had portrayed her thusly TO Angie, hence her supposed infuriation at her for blabbing what she takes as a diss, that fact to the world.

The really REALLY sad part is, I think Brad had indeed communicated that Maniston was his friend to AJ, I think he meant what he said in those pre-Brangelina interviews…that she meant a lot to him…and that they wanted to exit as beautifully as they entered the relationship, as friends who had and would ‘keep the love,’ — and it BREAKS MY HEART to think Brad had said this not only to Maniston herself and meant it, but to their friends, in front of Angelina, and to the whole world….ONLY to have Maniston stab him in the back, and twist the knife. It was a betrayal tantamount to GP’s.

Brad got trashed IN PUBLIC, in BOTH instances. Both Paltrow and Maniston are EQUALLY embarrassing for him.

lora Says:

December 29th, 2006 at 2:25 pm
Observer2 Says:

December 29th, 2006 at 2:17 pm
That Gala quote from Brad is from 1998 during his MJB press tour, it’s not recent.

As for Angelina not answering about Aniston. Whereas, Aniston lets the elephant in the room, Angelina escorts it from the room by not making it an issue. You see the difference? Aniston makes it an issue, Angelina doesn’t. Who wins that one? Angelina.

++++++++++++++++++++

Excellent point!!

****************************************************

NO,NO The quote is from 2005 promoting BABEL

Observer2 @ 12/29/2006 at 2:38 pm

Ell;

No, it’s not. Unless Brad is so practiced at this point, that he says the same exact thing he did in 1998, it’s a recycled quote, word for word. LOL!

Pages: « 126 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 » Show All