Angelina Jolie’s In-Depth Interview
If you haven’t already, you really need to read this Angelina Jolie interview published on Page G1 of the Dec. 22 issue of the Philippine Daily Inquirer. It’s one of the most in-depth looks into Angie’s life… Here’s an excerpt:
As I’m looking at you from the side, you and Brad could be brother and sister. Well, thank God we’re not (laughter).
Even in your voice and the way you respond to questions. Oh, no. Really?
Do you think your relationship is based on the fact that you are alike? You know, it’s funny. When we first came together, everybody commented on how different we were. So now it’s funny to hear somebody comment on how similar we are. Oh my God, I think you’ve scared me into thinking we’re starting to be that couple that morphs (starts looking like each other). We are very different in many ways — certainly in the way he is at home and the way I am at home. But we balance each other quite well.
Read the full interview after the jump! Pictures include: Angelina Jolie posing next to the film poster Beyond Borders (2003) at the Ziegfeld Theater.
Angelina Jolie - Philippine Daily Inquirer Interview
We haven’t talked to you in almost two years. Can you recap the high points in your personal journey in the last couple of years? The high points are the obvious. My coming together with Brad; Brad and Maddox coming together; and Zahara coming into our family. The low or scarier point was when Zahara got sick. Her surviving that was a high point. My having a baby (Shiloh) and now her personality is coming out—it’s fun. It’s great to see all three kids together.
On a professional level, this film was wonderful to work on. That I’ll be working a lot less and spending a lot more time at home was a welcome decision at the end of the day.
And you have been going on these missions for the UN. I’ve been working for the UN for five years now. I have been involved with projects in Cambodia for four years. I’m still pushing for different bills in Washington and they haven’t gone through. We have a new Congress. Maybe they will (pass those bills).
I’m trying to educate myself more to be able to handle discussions on issues better and not just be emotional about them. I would try to actually deal with them on a stronger level and make some changes.
As I’m looking at you from the side, you and Brad could be brother and sister. Well, thank God we’re not (laughter).
Even in your voice and the way you respond to questions. Oh, no. Really?
Do you think your relationship is based on the fact that you are alike? You know, it’s funny. When we first came together, everybody commented on how different we were. So now it’s funny to hear somebody comment on how similar we are. Oh my God, I think you’ve scared me into thinking we’re starting to be that couple that morphs (starts looking like each other). We are very different in many ways — certainly in the way he is at home and the way I am at home. But we balance each other quite well.
Can you give an example of how different you are? He’s very methodical and takes time with things. I’m very impulsive like on a decision we made yesterday. But (when we travel), he packs at the last minute while I pack three days ahead with all the kids’ stuff and five different things. I like to organize each moment of our travel but he likes to be more (spontaneous). But we appreciate each other. We need it. I need to be not so crazy about things.
How are you going to spend the holidays? We’re going somewhere this Christmas. We’ll spend the morning with our children, have a wonderful time with them and make it special for them and not forget that. We’re going to spend the day with some other people, bring them some things, listen and talk to them. I want to teach my kids that it’s not about what they’re going to get but it’s about who they’re going to think of, what they’re going to do, what they’re going to learn and who they are going to extend kindness to. The season is a good excuse to teach our children something really nice.
Spiritually, are Brad and you on the same page? Yes, I would say that. We’re not of any one faith ourselves but we are teaching the children about different faiths. We believe (in teaching them about) that. We believe that you should understand and learn about all the different faiths. Then teach your children and see where they fall and celebrate many different things. I suppose that is a unique thing to be very much in agreement on.
Do you have any respite from the paparazzi at all? We were just recently in our home in Cambodia and nobody was there. So there are ways and there are places (where there are no paparazzi). We also went to Brad’s parents’ house for about five days. That was lovely and quiet. Hopefully in the years to come, maybe if we work less, we’ll have more of a quiet life. Then our kids will have a more normal life. We just try not to let it (the paparazzi issue) affect us. It only does when we want the kids to have more freedom but other than that, we try to ignore it. There are worse problems so we’re OK.
Would you like to get married again? I have had two beautiful marriages (first to British actor Johnny Lee Miller and then to American actor Billy Bob Thornton) in my life. I don’t feel a need to get married at all at this moment. But I am committed to another person (Brad) and three children. I think that’s the most important. For people who want to be married, it’s a beautiful thing. It’s a wonderful thing and I’m all for it.
How much do you enjoy flying your own plane? I love it. It certainly gives me a freedom that I don’t have on the ground. Flying is a real skill. I know that sounds odd but I have spent my whole life with a job that is kind of odd. I interpret behavior, tell stories and I emote—those are not practical skills. So it was really wonderful for me as a woman and as a person to go back to school, take tests, study and learn a proper physical skill I can expand on. Hopefully one day, I would be able to give service as a pilot.
How often do you fly? I flew until I was about six and a half months pregnant. And then I wasn’t allowed to fly anymore. I flew about two months after Shiloh was born. I fly whenever I can. I haven’t been able to fly recently but probably I’ll fly in January and February.
Which of your movies made the most impact on you personally? I think everything does one way or the other. The funniest and probably the truest example is “Lara Croft: Tomb Raider” because it was about other countries. It was about being physically strong, fit and focused. So it got me healthy and let me travel to Cambodia. Cambodia changed my life. The next film let me travel to Africa. So in working with local people, you learn about these countries not just as a tourist. But I would say that Cambodia was the most significant one. Learning about land mines and refugees and the history of a country I knew very little about changed me and made me start to question. That was really the beginning of me questioning things.
Has being famous hindered or blocked your desire to help in many countries? It has been the best use of my celebrity. When I was younger, I didn’t know quite what to do with my celebrity status. You don’t really do interviews to talk about other topics. You haven’t come to many conclusions. You don’t have a lot to say. So to find a purpose in my life really helped me. I wake up and I don’t think about meaningless little things that I am worried about for myself. I’m able to focus outward and that is just a healthier way to live. Certainly the position I’m in has made it very easy for me to be able to meet with officials, get briefings and do things quicker. That’s an even exchange. The negative side of it is your credibility is questioned. A lot of people are out to make a very silly story when you’re trying to focus on something else or question why you do things. That’s to be expected.
Is it more difficult to be a mother of a boy or of girls? I don’t know. They’re very different. My boy was my first baby so that was hard. Perhaps when they’re teenagers, I’d say it’s harder to be a mother of a girl or I’d be more nervous about the girls going on dates than about the boy. That’s when it comes back at us. They’re interesting, crazy and wild in their own ways.
My son is very close to me. I don’t know if that’s because we were alone for a long time. I can see a little bit of a difference between a mother and son and between a daddy and his girls. It’s quite interesting. On giving birth to a child or adopting a child, I honestly did expect that there would be a different feeling. I was very concerned that there would be and I prepared for that. There was absolutely none. Other than sometimes I look at Shiloh and I see Brad—that’s sweet—I don’t feel any differently. That was a wonderful surprise. I was so happy to have Shiloh in Africa, that we could do that and for her to have a Namibian passport. She has that connection to another country and to her sister’s part of the world. I think that ties them together a little.
It must be easier now to have somebody around to help with the kids. It’s easier to be with somebody. But it’s better to be single if you’re with the wrong person (laughter). There were so many times with Mad when he was growing up that I’d be up in the middle of the night, exhausted, rocking him. Nobody was there—except for friends—who saw me exhausted, who appreciated my efforts. Nobody was there whom I could look at or explode in excitement with when Mad said his first word. That was a bit sad. It made me very close to Mad but there’s the joy now of waking up in the middle of the night, like last night, and looking at the other exhausted parent, sharing the burden and learning, smiling about a child’s new tooth and just enjoying children. As a woman, having a partner who appreciates you as a mom, who remembers your history with your children is special.
Even though I had Maddox, I didn’t have a family somehow. I have a very small family myself. Brad has a wonderful way—he really does invest in our daily life together. He makes the most of every single moment whereas I tend to move very quickly through things. So he slowed me down to really enjoy this time. That’s probably the greatest gift and what I love about him. I think I expected a lot of things when I met him. I didn’t know anything about him as a man except what you all write (laughing). I found a really kind, funny, down-to-earth man. Just a wonderful man that you usually expect in a different package. He is who he is in the world but at home he is a really wonderful friend and father.
Can you talk some more about how Brad has taught you to slow down and enjoy life? If I want to go on some trip because I want to have an adventure, explore and learn something, he’ll make sure that we have enough days to just be with our kids or we do something special with the family. He reminds me that it’s OK to take a deep breath, sit down, enjoy life, not race through it and let it go past you. He’s been very good for me in that aspect.
After the controversy of Madonna adopting a child, the cynical reaction from media was that some celebrities are “buying” babies. Did that hurt the chances of some babies being adopted? I hope not. I hope people are smart enough to understand that it was a very specific situation of a country that didn’t have foreign adoption (policy). So it’s a very specific legal situation. I hope everybody wishes the best for that little boy and his new life. Again, it’s the negative and positive media. It’s good for media to question whether there’s something at play that you need to understand or may not be right. Then there are people who decide to run stories in the most negative way possible just to sell magazines.
I was working in India and I didn’t go out of my way to study everything about it (Madonna’s adoption of a boy issue). I don’t know a lot about that country (Malawi). I have not been there. I have gotten lists of counties to adopt from and that country has never been on those lists. I believe that anybody who adopts a child has that commitment to that child for the rest of his life. There’s got to be some love in that situation. I don’t think it’s fair to just look at it in a negative way. We have to hope that’s the best for that little boy.
You grew up in a show business environment. Do you think your children will follow the same path? Strangely enough, because I didn’t live with my father (actor John Voight), I didn’t go to a bunch of film sets and things like that. But I did grow up in Hollywood and somewhat around that. What I am trying to give to my children—and it’s the one thing I didn’t have—is at least half a year, if not more, in a foreign country. On occasion, they’ve been on film sets. They’re around this stuff every once in a while but they really spend the majority of their lives not around this (Hollywood). I am trying to give them balance, like with Mad, he came to work with me in India and he played with the local kids. He hung out at the local places and he didn’t live a Hollywood life during that time.
It was the same case when we were in Africa. I am glad I can bring Mad to these foreign countries and he’s not looking for a Nintendo and a hotel room. He’s happy to go to some neighbor’s house that’s very modest and just play outside with rocks. So I hope with that balance, I’ll instill in the children something that’s more than just wanting to be in this business. But if they want to, God help us, we will let them (laughter).
Where is home for you? We don’t actually know. We have a lot of our stuff in Los Angeles but we’re looking for a home outside of that. We just went back to Cambodia which I consider home.
How was your experience working with Robert De Niro as director? On the set, Bob was so great to work with. When I first met him, somebody said to me, “Look, he doesn’t like to talk a lot. He’ll probably talk to you for five minutes.” We talked for almost two hours because we ended up talking about world affairs. He’s not a casual person.
Please comment on—first, how you look different in this movie because of your blonde hair. And second, how everybody talks about your beauty. (On the first question), that certainly makes me feel good. I have always seen myself as different looking. In “The Good Shepherd,” I had to go quite WASP-y whereas I am more ethnic looking. It’s easier for me to go darker than lighter and my character was quite light. (On the second question), I have gotten used to myself, my face. I don’t think of myself one way or another—kind of beautiful or ugly. I look like my mom and so that’s nice to me (laughing).
In portraying a woman, wife and mother from the 1930s and 1940s, what are some of the differences from your own experience living today? Many things. It wasn’t just the 30s and through. On top of it, she’s married to the CIA. She’s unable to express her independence. That was probably the hardest thing. She could not even have an improvised fight. How far could I (her character) take an aggressive attack or an insult? I always had to stay in my place and there wasn’t anywhere to go.
It was not possible (for my character) to say, “I’m leaving,” “I want a divorce,” “I want this” or “I want this for my child.” It was very claustrophobic in that marriage. It was very hard for me as an actress to do that, to make myself less opinionated, powerful and strong. On a funnier note, I was sent to manners classes—for lessons on how to hold a cup of tea, to cross my legs the right way and to tilt my head a little and listen. It was funny that the natural way we hold ourselves today as women is not as gracious and elegant as the women of that time.
That element of the film was lost on my character who was just drinking and ignoring it. But in my life, that element is there, even when it’s just going out with the kids or where I go. Or plans for the holidays or even trying to figure out anything really. When I was pregnant and I just wanted to go to my doctor’s appointments, I had to try to find some way to get there without people following me. All that felt very uncomfortable, to be honest. But it’s just a part of this business.
What do you think is the message of this film? To be honest, I’ve not seen the film yet so I don’t know which pieces were taken out or put in and how exactly it was told. I know that Bob’s intention was—and he probably says it better—not to give a specific, this-is-what-you-should-be-questioning element or feeling. Bob’s aim was to show people and situations. It’s up to the moviegoers to read into them.
My personal feeling on the political nature of the film is, it is always important to question your government and what it is doing, not just blindly trusting that it’s going to make the right decisions, and if it’s being moral or not. I think now is no exception. This is a time when we must be questioning, as we all are, the decisions of our current administration regarding foreign policy and so forth.
Will you and Brad do a sequel of “Mr. and Mrs. Smith” or perhaps another movie? There was talk at one point about another one of those but it would just be too weird since it would be so much our life (laughter). It would be like a home documentary. They said, “No, we’ll make another one and you’ll have children” and we thought, “Oh, good” (laughter). We’d love to work together on something but it’s tricky when you’re a couple and the world knows it. The movie should be a comedy. It’s easier for people who are in a relationship to have fun with each other, take shots at each other, than take each other seriously. Nothing has come across us yet, though.
With your career, family and UN work, how do you juggle all of them? Brad says I’m obsessive with schedule (laughing). I’m very fortunate to have him in my life. He’s a great father—really dedicated. We take turns working and we both love being with our kids. It’s a decision we made so it’s something we’ve wanted to do.
You must get exhausted from all your commitments. I love everything that I do. I love to work for the UN and in film. I relax with Brad and my kids. We do get exhausted like normal parents but we love it. If we plan to have a very large family, we shouldn’t stretch it out over the next 10 years or else we’ll be raising kids forever. So we’ve thought about it. I am sure we won’t wait forever to build our family.
So will you adopt again sooner than later? I think so, yeah.
In “Alexander” and “The Good Shepherd,” you played older women. How do you feel about aging? I’m looking very much forward to growing older. I want to be an exhausted older woman but with a very full life behind me and one still going. As an actress, they tell you things like don’t look this way or don’t age. Somebody even gave me advice not to play older women. To me, it has always been about the story and the character. Clover, my character in “The Good Shepherd,” was such an interesting woman. I loved the challenge of how she broke down and aged. Personally, I like to see age on faces.








Older











959 Comments
Joy Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 12:03 pm
Moder, 37, and Roberts, 39, met on the set of The Mexican — she was costarring with Brad Pitt and Moder was working as a cameraman. The couple tied the knot in July 2002 at their sprawling ranch in Arroyo Seco, New Mexico, near Taos, after Moder dumped his wife of five years, makeup artist Vera Steinberg.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I can’t believe they actually used the word ‘dumped’
—–
But you see they did not write that Roberts stoled Moder. See the media has a different standard when it comes to Angelina and Brad. Mostly Angelina.
lora Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 12:00 pm
Pass wind? Is that what they call burping? LOL must be a British expression. We say it in the states but it usually refers to another part of the body…
*****************************************
I thought the same thing. That article is merely a rehash/rewording of their recent quotes with a”new” headline insinuation thrown in to get us to read it, (i.e. pass wind = f-a-r-t) to get us thinking that Brad has made a new gas comment. Lame, but all too common. :(!
Angelina didn’t want that man to interview her,if you google Angelina jolie you will find the article.It is a couple of weeks old,before the article came out,now I know why.
I think even him the interviewer was surprised by the love between Brad and Angelina.I like the part were Angelina says ”lets go and scare your mother”
lurker opinion Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 12:10 pm
Joy Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 12:03 pm
Moder, 37, and Roberts, 39, met on the set of The Mexican — she was costarring with Brad Pitt and Moder was working as a cameraman. The couple tied the knot in July 2002 at their sprawling ranch in Arroyo Seco, New Mexico, near Taos, after Moder dumped his wife of five years, makeup artist Vera Steinberg.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I can’t believe they actually used the word ‘dumped’
—–
But you see they did not write that Roberts stoled Moder. See the media has a different standard when it comes to Angelina and Brad. Mostly Angelina.
**********************************************
I agree! You see how fast all the other break up gossip has dissipated. Kate Hudson openly living with Owen Wilson before her divorce was even filed, yet people are still raking Angie and Brad over the coals for getting together AFTER he was legally separated and the divorce was announced. The indigance of how people say Angie had the “nerve” to get pregnant before the divorce was final….. ARGH! Brad hadn’t even lived with __ for over a year by then, but you know….. none of that matters, because Angie MUST be painted as the villain at all costs. People who are still harping on that after all this time are stooooopider than they look.
lurker opinion Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 12:10 pm
Joy Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 12:03 pm
Moder, 37, and Roberts, 39, met on the set of The Mexican — she was costarring with Brad Pitt and Moder was working as a cameraman. The couple tied the knot in July 2002 at their sprawling ranch in Arroyo Seco, New Mexico, near Taos, after Moder dumped his wife of five years, makeup artist Vera Steinberg.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I can’t believe they actually used the word ‘dumped’
—–
But you see they did not write that Roberts stoled Moder. See the media has a different standard when it comes to Angelina and Brad. Mostly Angelina.
==================================================
this hypocracy does not only stem from who Angelina is but also who Vera Steinberg wasn’t
from people mag
THURSDAY JULY 13, 2006 03:25 PM EDT
FRIDAY JULY 14, 2006 08:00 AM EDT UPDATED
By Mary Green and Stephen M. Silverman
Angelina Jolie will play Mariane Pearl, the widow of slain Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, in a movie produced by Brad Pitt’s Plan B production company, Pitt has confirmed to PEOPLE.
“The film will focus on the deep collaboration between people around the world in search of Daniel in 2002,” Pitt tells PEOPLE. “We hope the film can increase understanding between people of all faiths and portray the story and the people involved as honestly as possible without anger or judgment.”
CONTRARY to reports claiming that Pitt’s ex, Jennifer Aniston, was earlier cast as Mariane Pearl, a rep for Pitt and Jolie tells PEOPLE, “Jennifer was NEVER attached to that role. When the project was first brought to Plan B, Jen was a partner in the company at the time.” Pitt has been developing the project with Mariane Pearl for two years.
The film will be adapted from Pearl’s memoir, A Mighty Heart: The Brave Life and Death of My Husband Danny Pearl, which chronicles her experience after her husband was abducted by Islamic extremists in Pakistan in early 2002. A month later, his captors released a video depicting his murder.
Pearl, a French journalist, was pregnant when her husband was kidnapped and gave birth to their son Adam in May of that year.
“I am delighted that Angelina Jolie will be playing my role in the adaptation of my book,” Pearl said in a statement released Thursday by Paramount Vintage. “I deeply admire her work and what she is committed to.”
The film will start shooting in the fall. It is Jolie’s first dramatic role since the May 27 birth of her daughter with Pitt, Shiloh Nouvel.
Earlier this week it was reported that Jolie will lend her voice to the DreamWorks animated feature Kung Fu Panda, in the role of Tigress, a martial arts teacher. The film, due next May, also stars Jack Black.
Keith Urban: summoned to Australia
You might be sick of my tagline but even the most amateur of gossips, the most hardcore of Nicole believers has to concede at this point that this recent well timed photo opp, in Australia no less, is much more Conspiracy than it is Coincidence.
Especially since some flooze decided to blow the top off of her long term relationship with Keith, complete with illustrations and suggestive photos, to expose the fraud that is the Kidman/Urban marriage.
As you likely already know, her name is Amanda Wyatt, she lives in Nashville, she met him at a bar, she says he was ******** her before Nicole and has continued to screw her after Nicole, just days in fact before he entered rehab in October, on the heels of a report in The National Enquirer exposing another incident of infidelity only three months before their public Sydney wedding. And as I told you back then – exclusively I might add – there will be more women and there will be more scandal and there will be more hollow denials and there will most certainly be more image-saving and image-making.
But even though Amanda Wyatt is certainly not innocent, even though she probably deserves the cheap and opportunistic labels now associated with her name, and even though Keith is the sinner and the drug user and the cheater, you might want to hold off before shedding any sympathy tears for Nicole Kidman.
As I’ve reported all along, word from Nashville is that this is a relationship based not on love but on business: a contracted husband for her in exchange for the fame and international crossover success he has craved forever. “Marry me and I will deliver Hollywood and Australia. Especially Australia” – it’s the widely held belief among Country gossips, that her dangling apple was the gift of conquering his home country, where she is the reigning princess, where he has always wanted to achieve a level of superstardom that had eluded him pre-Freeze.
According to my sources, Nicole knew about his exploits and she knew about his reputation and neither made a difference. Their arrangement allegedly exists on a “hear no evil, say no evil” basis: as long as he doesn’t embarrass her, as long as he doesn’t get “caught”, she supposedly couldn’t give a **** what he does, as long as he continues to publicly profess his devotion, as long as her shiny skin continues to bear the illusion of a woman in love, a woman for whom a man would pen a cheesy-ass love song, a woman almost 40 still desirable to a man desired by others, so long as this picture remains firmly planted in the public consciousness and the contract honoured, everything else was not only condoned, it was accepted.
But then…the most curious development.
Nicole the Bride becomes Nicole the Honourable – standing by her man, a softer image, an Ice Queen not so icy, dealing bravely with an addicted husband, “it was the alcohol that cheated…not Keith!” Suddenly Nicole Kidman has become the Jennifer Aniston of 2006, much more personable and more “relatable” to the MiniVan Majority and having spent a decade with the Master Manipulator, the Gay Midget Dwarf, Nicole is nothing if not shrewd. Which is why so she has elected NOT to bail, dutifully respecting her vows, of course, but also milking the generous hearts of a sympathetic public suffering along with her…
Well played, non?
So here you have it – just in time for Boxing Day, in a show of solidarity against the claims of Amanda Wyatt, Keith took a “break” from rehab to join his wife in Australia. And yet, despite being apart for months and therefore craving some privacy and intimacy, somehow photographers found them leaving a film studio, her face as smooth as a baby’s bottom, fresh flowers adorning her head, a smile and a wave perfectly presented for the hungry pappies fortuitous enough to be in the right place at the right time…
Coincidence or conspiracy???
Well, for those of you still unwilling to believe the elaborate lengths of the aforementioned plan, consider that throughout his “ordeal”, throughout this course of “treatment”, his mother has not been seen at all. His mother who toured with him, who adores him, his mother who has established many ties of her own in Nashville, his mother has been glaringly absent. And believe me, this is a woman who has been trotted out very ceremoniously when required.
The fact that she has stayed away from the circus speaks volumes, as told to me by a Nashville source today, unedited below:
“She (his mother) wants the best for Keith and we want the best for Keith. Keith has his issues, no doubt about that but Keith is Country. We don’t invite the paparazzi to take pictures of us and our demons. We get better, we move on, we sing about it, and we deal. We just want Keith back the way he used to be instead of whatever he is now. That’s what this Amanda Wyatt is trying to say – you come here to Nashville and I guarantee you you’ll hear the same thing from a hundred other people. We don’t know the new Keith. And we don’t know Nicole – and don’t’ go believin’ it when they say she lives here. She don’t live here, no way.”
And finally…what of Amanda Wyatt? Have a look at this special treat.
Nicole Kidman, despite the immovable forehead, and the creepy shiny skin, Nicole Kidman’s elegance and style is totally undeniable. So imagine… imagine you’re Nicole Kidman, head to toe Balenciaga, the face of Chanel, imagine your husband preferring THIS to you? A drag queen over the incomparable Satine?
****, forget the cheating. I’d divorce my husband for simply eyeballing this girl, nevermind tapping it, though as he just told me five minutes ago: you can’t fine dine every day, “sometimes you just gotta pig out on Taco Bell for the grease and the followup farts”…which is apparently guy-speak for going ghetto once in a while and clearly, Keith Urban likes to go ghetto more often than that.
I don’t think that Lainey cares too much for Nicole Kidman! LOL ;)
ladies,all of this magz are in brad and anjies coattails…. mnm .,/…m bmy baby help me type..sorry.
Hey Joy, thanks for posting this Nicole/Keith stuff….. I had no idea about all that. I guess I truly have been living under a rock. Other than movies, I don’t follow Nicole, and don’t like country music (yes, a Georgia Girl who hates country music and NASCAR!) I truly hope she hasn’t gotten herself into another “fake” marriage.
Eh…. I do recall she and Lenny Kravitz had a brief “thang”. Now that was hot. She shoulda stuck with Lenny. I think Keith is not-so-much to look at, and it seems he ain’t so much to admire, either.
Dragonfly -
it’s good to see your post again….it’s been a long time !!!
lora Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 11:27 am
I agree, the article was great because of Angie! I was a bit surprised he was doing the interview with Angelina cause I never liked what he said when he interviewed Gwyneth Paltrow. He said this in response to her complaints about the media interest in her, :
“On the one hand she has a point, Paltrow is not Angelina Jolie.Though she once dated Brad Pitt, she does not get tattoos, say shocking things, feud publicly with her parents, or steal other people’s husbands.”
I thought that was uncalled for..
++++++++++++++++
You guys are acting like Van Meter has total control over his article. He doesn’t. ANNA WINTOUR DOES. And therein lies the answer to the unevenness of the Vogue article. Wintour has a magazine to sell and I’m sure she had Van Meter re-write and re-write that story to HER satisfaction. The story had to be controversial enough to kick up interest and get people who don’t normally buy the mag to buy it. Wintour doesn’t give a cr-ap if she pisses off Angie or anyone else. And I’m sure Angie was aware that the story wouldn’t all be positive when she gave the interview. My gut feeling is that Wintour edited that story down to the last dotted i.
BCBG Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 12:39 pm
Dragonfly -
it’s good to see your post again….it’s been a long time !!!
***********************************
I’ve missed you guys!
If somebody ever wished to be me for a day, they’d be the most pissed-off person once they got here. They would be, like, in hell.
– Jennifer Aniston *(and THIS, while she was WITH Brad…lovely)
**************
Now you guys see what Brad had to put up with. The guy needs a medal for having put with that woman for all those years.
Chanel Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 12:42 pm
If somebody ever wished to be me for a day, they’d be the most pissed-off person once they got here. They would be, like, in hell.
– Jennifer Aniston *(and THIS, while she was WITH Brad…lovely)
**************
Now you guys see what Brad had to put up with. The guy needs a medal for having put with that woman for all those years.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
;)
Passing Through Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 12:39 pm
lora Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 11:27 am
I agree, the article was great because of Angie! I was a bit surprised he was doing the interview with Angelina cause I never liked what he said when he interviewed Gwyneth Paltrow. He said this in response to her complaints about the media interest in her, :
“On the one hand she has a point, Paltrow is not Angelina Jolie.Though she once dated Brad Pitt, she does not get tattoos, say shocking things, feud publicly with her parents, or steal other people’s husbands.”
I thought that was uncalled for..
++++++++++++++++
You guys are acting like Van Meter has total control over his article. He doesn’t. ANNA WINTOUR DOES. And therein lies the answer to the unevenness of the Vogue article. Wintour has a magazine to sell and I’m sure she had Van Meter re-write and re-write that story to HER satisfaction. The story had to be controversial enough to kick up interest and get people who don’t normally buy the mag to buy it. Wintour doesn’t give a cr-ap if she pisses off Angie or anyone else. And I’m sure Angie was aware that the story wouldn’t all be positive when she gave the interview. My gut feeling is that Wintour edited that story down to the last dotted i.
**********************************************
Great point, PT! I can totally beleive that. It also makes me wonder what Angie said that didn’t get included, yet so much is being made about a remark, that to me, seems as if it was made in passing.
Pssssst! Also, ITA with your comments on the inspirational stuff! I was reading and scrolling through all that stuff and got to your post and said “YES! Thank you PT!” HAhahaha!!!
dragonfly Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 11:52 am
HAY YA’ll!!
I have missed so many threads and soooo many great convos for the last couple of weeks, but I am more than ready to jump right back in!
++++++++++++
Dragonfly! There ya are! Just last night I was wondering where the heck you were! I hope you’re enjoying the holidays and the break between semesters! It’s nice and quiet here, too bad the students will be back in a week!
Passing Through Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 12:39 pm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Very insightful. I bet you could find a needle in a haystack! :lol: What do you do for a living?! I could have used you on my team back in the day. To bad I fly solo with my work nowadays.
Hey guys, I hope everyone is doing well. I take almost everything that comes from tabloids as a grain of salt. I mean they once..actually twice, hinted that Britney was dating her dancer/choreographer….the problem is he’s GAY lol And he’s out. I know this for a fact because my sister’s gay friend took a dance classes with him and he said “He was the biggest queen ever” lol His words, not mine. Ms. Spears may not be the brightest crayon in the box but I doubt she’s Grace looking for her Will.
****, forget the cheating. I’d divorce my husband for simply eyeballing this girl, nevermind tapping it, though as he just told me five minutes ago: you can’t fine dine every day, “sometimes you just gotta pig out on Taco Bell for the grease and the followup farts”…which is apparently guy-speak for going ghetto once in a while and clearly, Keith Urban likes to go ghetto more often than that.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
that’s so funny. I HAD this one boyfriend, and I thought he was asleep, so my girlfriend and I were talking about her one night fling that she was wracked with guilt about. I said “what’s done is done, learn from it and don’t do it again. Then just to make her feel better I added “you can eat steak every night and still feel like having a Whopper once in a while” My boyfriend got up and said “Am I a steak or a Whopper??’
dragonfly Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 12:39 pm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Don’t know what happened to my post to you but here I attempt again.
I didn’t know that her and LK were an item!!!!!!!!!!! I with you I never paid too much attention to her myself. I think she is a little overrated and thank God she did not take the role in MMS!
It is nice to see your name again!
Passing Through Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 12:47 pm
dragonfly Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 11:52 am
HAY YA’ll!!
I have missed so many threads and soooo many great convos for the last couple of weeks, but I am more than ready to jump right back in!
++++++++++++
Dragonfly! There ya are! Just last night I was wondering where the heck you were! I hope you’re enjoying the holidays and the break between semesters! It’s nice and quiet here, too bad the students will be back in a week!
*******************************************
I know! So nice and quiet in here right now…..I am getting TONS of work done, ::wink, wink::….
dragonfly Says:
December 29th, 2006 at 12:08 pm
HA! And I see there’s a new theory afoot that __ claimed to be preggers to get Brad to marry her….LMAO! What a hoot! What poetic justice if the very thing that Angie is repeately accused of (having a baby to catch/keep Brad) is ACTUALLY what little miss Zone Diet did? I know it’s only a piece of ninth-hand gossip, but funny as s-h-i-t just the same. And in her case, much more likely she’d have to resort to that kind of tactic to get Brad than Angie.
+++++++++++++
What? Where’d you hear this at Dragonfly? That’s a new one on me. Hell…I can just see X pulling that tired old “I think I’m pregnant” line on Brad. That’s so soap opera-ish. I wonder where she could’ve gotten the idea from…surely not her father’s show?
Passing Through Says: December 29th, 2006 at 12:39 pm
re: lora Says: December 29th, 2006 at 11:27 am
I agree, the article was great because of Angie! I was a bit surprised he was doing the interview with Angelina cause I never liked what he said when he interviewed Gwyneth Paltrow. He said this in response to her complaints about the media interest in her, :
“On the one hand she has a point, Paltrow is not Angelina Jolie.Though she once dated Brad Pitt, she does not get tattoos, say shocking things, feud publicly with her parents, or steal other people’s husbands.”
I thought that was uncalled for..
++++++++++++++++
You guys are acting like Van Meter has total control over his article. He doesn’t. ANNA WINTOUR DOES. And therein lies the answer to the unevenness of the Vogue article. Wintour has a magazine to sell and I’m sure she had Van Meter re-write and re-write that story to HER satisfaction. The story had to be controversial enough to kick up interest and get people who don’t normally buy the mag to buy it. Wintour doesn’t give a cr-ap if she pisses off Angie or anyone else. And I’m sure Angie was aware that the story wouldn’t all be positive when she gave the interview. My gut feeling is that Wintour edited that story down to the last dotted i.
^^^
I agree….to a point. AW edited, but I also believe she made certain not to burn the bridge to a sure thing TRANSLATION “Angie moves mags.” No VF fiasco’s here, or backtracking down the road for AJ, and so I have a strong vibe that both Brad and Angie got a gander at it before it hit the stands and waved it on through. I also just feel Angelina gets a respect from people like AW that stops them from even attempting a VF type of interview. They no better. JMHO
jpf
new pic at perez
You guys are acting like Van Meter has total control over his article. He doesn’t. ANNA WINTOUR DOES. And therein lies the answer to the unevenness of the Vogue article. Wintour has a magazine to sell and I’m sure she had Van Meter re-write and re-write that story to HER satisfaction. The story had to be controversial enough to kick up interest and get people who don’t normally buy the mag to buy it. Wintour doesn’t give a cr-ap if she pisses off Angie or anyone else. And I’m sure Angie was aware that the story wouldn’t all be positive when she gave the interview. My gut feeling is that Wintour edited that story down to the last dotted i
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
That makes sense for Angie’s interview, but I just didnt see the need to diss Angie like that in the GP interview. ESPECIALLy since he had met Angie and interviewed her before. It stirred up no interest for GP’s interview at all.
Pages: « 1 … 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 … 39 » Show All