The Pitts in Panama

Joy I think the plot sounds interesting, but I think they would avoid it as the public may see it as too much like MAMS. I would love to see them do something together that has alot of sexual tension, drama, and action, which were certainly plot points of MAMS, but I think it would be cool to see a period piece, a costume drama with them in it….. and not really a straight-out love story, either. Maybe a case of star-crossed lovers. Something about time travel or love across the ages would be great. Like Angie said, they don’t want something that is too much like their real life, as it would feel too much like a documentary, i.e. MAMS with kids.

I think it would be extra difficult to do a straight out love scene with your real life partner. So many actors talk about how love scenes and the filming of them is far from sexy or romantic… you have to hold your head a certain way when you kiss or wrap your arms around the person, all for the benefit of camera angles, and many actors have said it is the most unnatural thing in the world, far from the way you would really kiss and fondle your actual lover. So, I can see where, if one had to film a sex scene with the actual lover, you would naturally kiss them like you really kiss them at home, not keeping camera angles and all that in mind….. you would have to train yourself to do it the movie way, not the natural way. I think that would make it harder for everyone involved to get a proper movie scene.

BUT, I do hope they take a chance and do something romantic with at least ONE good love scene. I’m being selfish, but I hope they do!

Angie’s hair looks really pretty.. very thick and long. She looks great either way but I like seeing her wear it down.

i hope they are having a great vacation!

it would be nice for one thread to be aniston free.

jmho

Ladies I am gone for the day and am not sure if I will be able to lurk/post this weekend due to some technical difficulties at home. (Trees are beautiful but I really think they are best at the park and not on my property–last year this time I woke up to one of the suckers on my car!)

Joy
TTFN

Joy Says: December 29th, 2006 at 4:31 pm

Ladies I am gone for the day and am not sure if I will be able to lurk/post this weekend due to some technical difficulties at home. (Trees are beautiful but I really think they are best at the park and not on my property–last year this time I woke up to one of the suckers on my car!)

Joy
TTFN

^^^

Have a nice weekend and stay safe. I live in tornadoland and understand waking up with a tree sitting on something other than the ground.

jpf

Idon’tlikeyouinthatway.com Says:

December 29, 2006

Jennifer Aniston is Insane

In the January issue of US Weekly, close friends of the Friends star say that Jennifer Aniston’s emotional health, still fragile because of Vince Vaughn’s cheating, has suffered since Angelina’s recent interview with Vogue and the Oscar-winning actress’ current promotional tour for The Good Shepherd . Outlook not good:

On the effect of seeing pictures of baby Shiloh:

“she collapses in a heap, clutching her womb like she’s been stabbed if she so much as passes a baby stroller on the street.”

On how she deal with it:

“throwing baby dolls into a bonfire on the beach behind her place in Malibu. It’s creepy, but she says it makes her feel better for a few hours.”

Hey, there’s a bright side:

“At least she’s stopped watching ‘Mr. & Mrs. Smith’ over and over again, for days at a time without eating or sleeping. That just wasn’t healthy.”

Yikes. There’s bad, and then there’s this. Jennifer Aniston could eat live bunnies and seem less crazy. In Jennifer’s defense, it must suck knowing that the only reason you were ever considered A-list has moved on and started a family with someone who is better than you in every possible way. Not in
Jennifer’s defense, it’s been two years. If my math is right, this means it takes less time for a newborn baby to speak in complete sentences than it does for Jennifer Aniston to realize Brad Pitt isn’t coming back home.

33 Comments:

That’s funny as hell. Poor Rachel.

By Anonymous, on 11:54 AM

I don’t know; I’m kind of over Angelina. It’s really kind of passive aggressive to keep telling the media she’d like to have a sit-down with Jen. To talk about what? No one would want to meet with the woman who stole her husband, either, and Angelina knows it. She’s just trying to look good.
Plus — the odds of this stuff about Aniston being true is pretty damn slim. It sounds all made up.

By Anonymous, on 11:54 AM

WTF?
Throwing baby dolls in a bonfire ????
That trumps the blood in a vial necklace. The Aniston psycho fans can shut up now.

By Anonymous, on 11:58 AM

Seriously, like her friends are telling those horrible things to US WEEKLY, trashy mag. Riiight. All of that sounds made up. People just wont leave her alone, Im sure she will be compared to Brangelina for her entire life. Poor girl.

By Anonymous, on 11:59 AM

“Plus — the odds of this stuff about Aniston being true is pretty damn slim. It sounds all made up.”
Unlike a lot of other rags, US Weekly triple checks facts and has reliable sources. Sorry, your beloved Jennifer is nuts.

By Anonymous, on 11:59 AM

As hilarious as it sounds, there is no way she is this crazy. If that were true, we’d have some sort of public breakdown by now.

By Anonymous, on 12:00 PM

“US Weekly triple checks facts and has reliable sources”
LMAO, hilarious. Whooo, that was a funny one. My sides hurt from laughing so hard.

By Anonymous, on 12:01 PM

^ Your logic is fucked. If it hasn’t happened in front of the world, it can’t be true? Do you know how many famous celebs are angels in front of cameras and batshit insane behind closed doors? The answer is MOST.

By Anonymous, on 12:03 PM

Nobody considers US a reliable source, get a grip dude. Im so sick of hearing about all three of these people, the tabloids need some new material stat.

By Anonymous, on 12:03 PM

US Weekly is more reliable than most celeb weekly mags. Get over it.
If this were about Angelina, then you Aniston fans would be all over this story. Shut up. All you psycho fans on both “teams” should kill yourselves.

By Anonymous, on 12:05 PM

FYI - As usual on an Aniston/Pitt/Jolie story, if your IP address is logged repeatedly and you’re suspected of trolling and inciting, your comments will not be approved.

By moderator , on 12:14 PM

Aniston’s friends seem like a close knit, loyal group and I’d be surprised if any of them would spill on her - this just doesn’t ring true.

By Anonymous, on 12:15 PM

A good friend of mine worked closely with Jennifer and Brad when they were in town and Brad was filming a movie here. This was a long time before he worked with Angelina. My friend told me some stories about these people. Brad and Jennifer were miserable together even back then. Jennifer is really weird and miserable and all she does is drink coffee and chain smoke cigarrettes all day. She hates going out in public. Hates it. Brad was quite the opposite.

By Anonymous, on 12:19 PM

This is bullshit. Why don’t they claim she has secretly collected Brads hair in a hairbrush he left behind and made a voodoo doll out of it, standing in her backyard, naked of course, dancing under the moonlight burning pictures of Angelina with the Brad doll clutched between her teeth?
Look, now that I wrote that, US Weekly can publish it, claiming a vague “source.”

By hopped up on hydroxycut , on 12:22 PM

^ Okay, if you don’t like the story, then it’s bullshit. I’ll remember that next time US publishes a less than flattering story about Angelina and you “Team Aniston” psychos cheer them on for publishing it.

By Anonymous, on 12:25 PM

Whoa….Obsess much Jennifer? Who knows if this story is true or not, but if it is, it sounds like Jen needs to look into getting some new compadres pronto because with friends like these- who needs enemies?

By Anonymous, on 12:30 PM

Jennifer Aniston needs to come out of the closet. It’s so obvious that she and Cox-Arquette are MFEO.
Forget teams Aniston, Vaughastin, Jolie, Jolie-Pitt-Thornton-Voight-Miller whatev.
Let’s vote: Team “I’m Here. I’m *****. Get used to it!”
This goes for Aiken, Valderama, and Travolta, too.

By Anonymous, on 12:31 PM

This probably wasn’t a “friend” but more like one of the people who works for/with her. These people have tons of people around them all the time. Assistants, housekeepers, decorators, managers, assistant managers, publicists, assistants of publicists, all these people’s secretaries, etc.

By Anonymous, on 12:33 PM

Oh, yeah. And Joey from Blossom. He’s gay too.

By Anonymous, on 12:35 PM

” moderator said…
FYI - As usual on an Aniston/Pitt/Jolie story, if your IP address is logged repeatedly and you’re suspected of trolling and inciting, your comments will not be approved. ”
Thank God. I don’t think I can take reading another one of these “Brangelina” threads.

By Anonymous, on 12:36 PM

Didn’t good ol’ Jennifer have her chance? I mean she did sleep with the man for several years. I wouldn’t be so dismissive of tabloids. They do have journalists who have worked in mainstream media and crossed over to the dark side. Plus, with sue happy lawyers and celebrities, they have to be somewhat careful of what they print.

By Anonymous, on 12:36 PM

This is so not true, i know for a fact because we are good friends. When are people gonna leave her alone.

By Anonymous, on 12:37 PM

Ew. Burnt plastic smells gross. I hope they’re cloth babydolls.

By Anonymous, on 12:38 PM

I’m not Team Aniston or Team Jolie, I think both teams are insane. I think worshipping a person that you have never met and likely will never meet should strictly be left to the 13 and below crowd, and it’s frightening that people 13 and up indulge in it.
And this story is far from “less than flattering.” It paints her as a complete psychopath, and it’s bullshit.
The media just perpetuates this lame rivalry myth and seriously? Burning baby dolls? That’s the stupidest thing I’ve seen all day.
Although I do think it was pretty cunty of Angelina to talk about a sit down with Aniston. All it did was put Aniston firmly back in the
“victim” role in the media right when everything had pretty much died down. I’m sure that was one of her motivations.

http://www.idontlikeyouinthatway.com/2006/12/jennifer-aniston-is-insane.html

You BAMZS fans ask for us JA fans to not come on here and trash ‘em, and we have the right to be fans without hating on this family but it’s okay for you to trash JA and to go on her threads?
Knock it off, JEN IS A BASKETCASE…you were doing the same thing on the JA thread.

Your a BAMZs fan, that’s great, more power to ya but why be a JA hater and ruin our threads, since you ask us not to ruin these threads.

One of your own brought up JA Says:

December 29th, 2006 at 4:37 pm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

First of all, we can’t control what other BAMZS fans do. And who’s to say that they are authentic BAMZS fans in the first place? They could be mercenary pot-stirrers who swap fan affiliations whenever it’s convenient and gets off on the antagonism that they created.

Again, despite people like Lainey labelling us as such, BAMZS fans aren’t a cult; we are not all of the same mind. Some of us hate ___, some tolerate her, some may even like her, but we, as individuals, are responsible for what we say.

You need to address specific people about their conduct.

A response to JA HATERS/BAMZS lovers Says:

December 29th, 2006 at 4:31 pm
Then stop ur talking **** about her on her threads. Gayle, Gussie, Gayle, Observer 2 keep brining Pitt/Jolie up…aren’t they BAMZS fans.
We Aniston fans are in the same boat, let’s just both leave eachother alone.

TRUCE
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=

Grow up. I can’t help it that so many don’t like Aniston. I can only speak for myself and I have a mother, I don’t need another. If you can’t handle what we have to say on any thread about her, then don’t read. Simple.

Would you like some cheese with your Whine?

these pictures of Brad in his bike gear are soooooo HOT and macho *oops*

OBSERVER2, but if a JA fan comes on here trashing BAMZS, you go on and on about how it’s not right and some of you even say that JA shouldn’t be brought up. Why can’t you be that mature? You have a major double standard, it’s okay for you to do it, but not for JA fans. Knock it off and if anyone has some growing up to do, its you. Can’t we just agree to disagree? Keep your comments about JA, limited to BAMZS threads? You ask us not to trash, you’re practically calling JARED to ban the haters but it’s okay for you?

well, I sure ain’t wasting my time on other fan threads, I’m busy enlarging Brad’s
pix, that is