Brad Pitt Filming in the Caribbean

Oh MY 43 Yrs old and I am done,,,,,,Im old ‘– yet — I dont have wrinkles, I have my teeth, I dont lay around playing video games all day, I can still do anything I did at 18… I am not even a grama yet and my times running out. I better start living like I am 83. Back to my rocking chair…..

to Missouri Girl,

What do you think that I tried to say by saying that blood is thicker than anything?

Does everybody including yourself know the Jolie-Pitts so damn well to write comments on the threads, one after the other one? The fans and the haters write things as if they live in the house of Jolie-Pitts, why did my comment bother you so much? I don’t see you point at all for this sarcaism.

to ALL,

I am sorry that I have NOT complated my sentence which was “the blood is thicker than anything FOR SOME PEOPLE”

It’s morning in France and I have to answer the needs of my daughter and prepare breakfast for all while I was writing a comment, pardon.

everyone must be sleeping here lool!!!!!!!!

TAFTUFA!

I just came in from a nite out to have fun, are you still here? I got your message.
If you are not here I will answer it then go to sleep.

953
ntt Says:

January 6th, 2007 at 3:30 am
944
**. Thomas Stranger Says:

January 6th, 2007 at 2:42 am
Brad Pitt was on Great Hans Lollik island kissing and playing with Cate! He’s gorgeous (of course) and so is she!
================

Try something else, hun, because after the shooting, he ran back in a hurry to be with his beloved peeps. Everybody already know that he misses his peeps when he is away from them, Not like with his X, whom he can be away for months on end.

so glad you called her out on that! I was going to until I saw your post, good I’m too tired to rant ;)

From Page 6 NYPOST

Lap Of Luxury

BRAD Pitt and Angelina Jolie have cast aside their Third World lifestyle for some pricey vacation digs in the Virgin Islands. Spies at the Caneel Bay resort tell The Post’s Braden Keil that Brangelina have been living the high life with their kids and nannies in a five-bedroom, $8,000-a-night beachfront villa, formerly the private “cottage” of Laurance Rockefeller, who developed the 170-acre Caribbean playground in the 1950s. “They showed up with 97 pieces of luggage and a whole entourage,” gushed an incredulous witness. Pitt and Jolie have been spotted having candlelit dinners nightly on their veranda.

************

C’mon, the Studio is paying for their accommodation since Brad is filming and did someone really count the number of their luggages? Maybe Brad and Angie’s family spent new year’s eve with them…

Brad is not native american. when she said ‘ we are part native american ‘ she meant shiloh and her which is rather sweet.

To: 962
Did this reporter from NY Post check the contents of the luggages? Could they be diapers for the children? papers? receipts they have to sort out needed to file their income tax? It’s that time again!! Maybe they contain the guns they used when they were filiming Mr and Mrs. Smith? Why was this reporter counting the luggages.
He must have an agenda. Do anything to put the BAMZS down.
By the way, I forgot to mention that I am happy that Brad is part Native American. I am happy that Angie is too.

962
fiona Says:
January 6th, 2007 at 7:26 am

From Page 6 NYPOST

Lap Of Luxury

BRAD Pitt and Angelina Jolie have cast aside their Third World lifestyle for some pricey vacation digs in the Virgin Islands.
—————————————-
Oh really?? Vacations?? hmmmm… how about Brad SHOOTING HIS NEW MOVIE?? No?? Their vacations where in Costa Rica and Panama. So I bet according to them all the people that are humanitarians must live in camps sleep in the ground and beg in the streets for money so they can be satisfied. Or that rule only applies for Brad and Angie?? Anyway, what else you can expect from NY post..

Everyone in NY knows the Post is a conservative right wing newspaper. They are always snarky when it comes to Brad and Angelina and pretty much anyone who has a mind of their own.

This is going to be my last post on the subject of Angie’s comments in that interview, because I don’t really want to talk about it anymore and I’m quite sick of being lumped in together with “haters,” Fanistons, and ritzygirl because I had a problem with one comment of Angie’s in a long interview.

945
Passing Through Says:
January 6th, 2007 at 3:00 am

I read, I react. Thats it. No nefarious plan, or “looking” for something to hate involved. If I did such a thing, I’d use a pseudonym like Ritzygirl if all I wanted to do is cause a shitstorm and/or be negative.

++++++++++++

Okay…I’ve been reading through this drivel and I’m finally going to make a comment…and a nasty one at that…You said you “I read, I react.” BUT you didn’t say you stop and think rationally about the possible meanings. Basically YOU JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS and then, rather than admit the possibility that you’ve MIS-READ what was said (ie, “valuable” instead of “Vulnerable”) you stick by your original position even when people point out to you, in innumberable ways, how you’re wrong. It’s not the first time you’ve done it and it probably won’t be the last. Hmmm…How very Faniston of you.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

PT, you are one of the posters I respect most here, so I will respond to you here. If you go back and follow the thread from the beginning of my comments last night, I have conceded that its possible that as she’s done in the past, Angie “trailed off” on her comment and didn’t complete the thought she had in the most articulate way, thereby leaving what she actually did mean with a different meaning than what she actually intended.

“I read, I react,” wasn’t meant to indicate I always stick by my original position on everything. I understand that people have different interpretations of things. But a lot of times things Angie says are open to interpretation, other people in the thread have admitted this. Why can’t you guys see that its possible, from what she says, for people to misunderstand or misread or take something in a certain way from the face value of what she says?

Its not the first time I’ve done it? Because in the past I’ve said I disagreed with the marriage issue? How are my personal feelings on marriage WRONG? How were they proven wrong?

You know, you guys always do this. I think you rightly attack Fanistons and probably ritzygirl since she’s psycho. But since I have a less than favorable interpretation of something Angie says for the first time in quite a long time, you start with all kinds of personal bashes and attacks like “Ignore that FITR” and COMPLETELY and totally baseless “Faniston” accusations. When have ANY of you ever known me to think or say anything remotely positive about Aniston?

Cliniqua, I appreciate your response to the whole debate, because you know, I can be persuaded that my initial reaction and opinion of things is wrong. And Cliniqua’s thoughtful response and how it is laid out is really my purpose in posting what I do, I WANT to debate and I want people to show me how and why I’m wrong, but when I get attacked and accused of being a “hater” and a “Faniston” and all sorts of other things, its not cool. Everyone who has a less than glowing reaction to something is NOT automatically those things.

NY Post - they are a right wing rag and they always try to sensationalize thing. Like others have said, since when have Brad and Angie have had a “third world lifestyle?” LOL, its actually sort of funny that people are expecting that because they care about issues like poverty and refugees that means they have to be and live as though they’re in similar economic circumstances?

Brad is likely there for filming, but even if he weren’t, why is it a bad thing that theyr’e taking a break in a little luxury?

97 pieces of luggage? They travel constantly around the world with two adults and three small children. Plus, I’m sure that some of that luggage was for members of their party, like their nannies, bodyguards, assistants, etc.

Good part of that blurb, the “candlelight dinners” on the veranda of their hotel room - awww. :)