OlderWed, 10 January 2007 at 10:36 pm
Brad Pitt Back to Being Benji Button
Brad Pitt is back filming The Case of Benjamin Button! He was spotted earlier today on the streets of New Orleans filming scenes in a nearly unrecognizable costume. Is that really him? Why yes, yes it is.
Pictured in this entry: Some old pictures of Brad Pitt in L.A. late last month supposedly “waiting patiently at his office for a look at some artwork painted by one of his friends.” Hawt.
Share This Post:
594 Comments
oh, speaking of vogue…does anybody need a copy of angie’s? i’ve got two.
436
gitane Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:16 pm
431 lookwhaticando
i thought so too. made me a little misty-eyed. but i watch adoption stories every morning and cry so i’m just weepy anyway.
====================================
I feel the same way, You don’t want to go with me to a sad movie, I’ll have tears all over your shoulder
Access Hollywood has now picked up on the Arquette story, and since the Arquette side is still silent, my guess is this **** was planned to happen to smear Brad and angies read carpet walk.
452
gitane Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:36 pm
oh, speaking of vogue…does anybody need a copy of angie’s? i’ve got two.
===========================================
I have two also, but I aint sharing,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>running>>>>>>>>>
Got this comment off from another site
===========================================
Interesting that Rupert Murdoch owns the New York Post, and Elle Magazine. He also own the UK Sun, UK Mirror and News of the World in Australia. Those are publications that Angelina threatened with a lawsuit when they claimed Zahara’s mother was alive (lie) and that the same publications Jolie sent cease and desist orders to for quoting her in an interview she never did. I’m beginning to believe that Angelina never gave that Elle UK interview and Murdoch has been served notice. All of a sudden they’re running five year old false stories in the Post? I hope she sues his old **** A**
449
Yeah right Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:32 pm
Why are you all focusing all of your attention on what rumors are being spread about them? If you are REAL fans of Brad and Angelina, then learn from them.———
Your right. People should focus on the real issues. Things that matter. But please don’t assume that we don’t. The topic here wasn’t the war in Iraq. Its about the tabloids. There are plenty people here that do care about real issues and do talk about them. So let not lecture and assume false things.
==============
I’m assuming because the fans on this blog are giving way too much importance to the tabliods. We all moan that the Jolie Pitts are not given the privacy they deserve yet we jump at the chance of seeing pictures of them, whether they were harassed in the process of those photogs getting those pictures seems not to matter to the fans anymore. We seek every detail of their lives. What tattoos Brad has, people make timelines of their life for two years. They discuss their every movement they make and want to find out every detail they can get their hands on. I am talking about the fans, not the trolls. I say “we” because sometimes I’m guilty of it too.
I’m basing my assumption on what I have read here. The kinds of details being discussed about them is not right. If the fans want them to get privacy and respect from the paparazzies and media, then the fans have to stop craving every detail of their lives or begging for new pictures. There is hypocrisy in that. We all say we admire the Jolie Pitts for the good they are doing in the world and making change happen. Shouldn’t people stop worrying to the degree they do about Brad and Angelina and worry about the world? Isn’t that the purpose of what Angelina and Brad are doing. They go to these third world countries to put the spotlight on the needy and they go to the premiere of GGTOFS to focue the attention of those Lost Boys of Sudan.
All I see is bickering about how the Jolie Pitts look, what the rags are saying, and Maniston is doing. I do see some intelligent discussion but that has become very rare.
454
sad Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:45 pm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yeah,
Arquette is as solid as Gilbralter. {eye roll}
Of course AH is going to pick up on it. They have been Team Aniston for two years. They refused to talk about Angelina’s Vogue interview by itself. They only talked about it when Us Weekly wrote the story about “Jen’s pain.”
I really don’t care what he said at this point. He is a low person to bring all that up again and to once again drag Brad and Angelina through this mess again. I had alot of respect for that guy but with his big mouth he has lost it. I thought he was the last sane decent person in that godess circle. Clearly I was wrong.
If Jennifer Aniston is trying to have a new pr stratagy why can’t she do it without bringing up the past? Be a “strong’ woman all you want. Do the crybaby yoga till you are blue in the face. But why does she need to allow her friends to play the pitty card again? How is that strong?
Two years later and her friends are still talking about this. Do any of these people shut up?
Frustrated
—–
I hear you but you can’t really get upset that people come here to vent and chat. If you want to start a conversation about social issues and politics fine but because others don’t want to take part doesn’t mean any one of us can say what they focus on in their daily lives. Like I was saying in my post before, I wouldn’t lecture the people here. Really, its a comment section. Where lots of conversations take place. If we or I or you don’t like them we can go someplace else to find what we are looking for.
I do see your point and I’m not trying to bash you or anything.
409
CLINIQUA Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 1:13 pm
First of all…let me address this ‘Brad should speak out’ business.
I find this fascinating. So was it angie’s “not caring” attitude that caused her to come out and say the Gala quote were falsehoods and took her words out of context? Was Angie “not caring” when she went on the ridiculous PR campaign and her newfound “tell all” strategy about her family starting with the Vogue interview and going on through the UK Elle “blob” interview?
Face it. Angie really isn’t that hard to read. She ignores the press when it doesn’t suit her and plays to them and manipulates them when it does suit her. Her quote about Madonna were ridiculous, whether taken out of context, lost in translation or whatever. She realized she was getting heat for it and getting slammed for it and put out a statement. It may not have been something superficial regarding a baby bump like a lot of the stupid rag headlines but don’t act like she’s so above it all. She knows how her bread gets buttered.
And, by the way, I’m glad to know that your boycott of certain gossip sites and magazines affected their editorial staff enough for them to “change” their tone. Next I think you should start boycotting certain gas stations to see what you can do to get OPEC to bring down the cost of oil. I’m very impressed with your influence. (for you slow kids, this is known as sarcasm).
Off Topic - click if you care .. it’s about KD and her flop Vogue cover .. Huvane mentioned
+++++++++++++++++++++
Anyone knows how much the Angelina one sold?
435
CLINIQUA Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:13 pm
433
Alexanderina Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:10 pm
Okay it seems that we have two Alexanderinas in here, I am the original one and Post 411 is not me, but Post 412 is mine. So, what are we going to do, cause I am not changing my name, been using this name on JJ for over a year now
———————————-
LMAO, you go Alexanderina, with your feisty self!
————————————————————————————————
When it comes to my name I don’t play, especially if it a name that means a lot to me, and this one does :)
456
L Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:46 pm
Got this comment off from another site
===========================================
Interesting that Rupert Murdoch owns the New York Post, and Elle Magazine. He also own the UK Sun, UK Mirror and News of the World in Australia. Those are publications that Angelina threatened with a lawsuit when they claimed Zahara’s mother was alive (lie) and that the same publications Jolie sent cease and desist orders to for quoting her in an interview she never did. I’m beginning to believe that Angelina never gave that Elle UK interview and Murdoch has been served notice. All of a sudden they’re running five year old false stories in the Post? I hope she sues his old **** A**
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here is why I think the ELLE magazine interview was false
- Angelina mentioned the number of kid they wanted: 10. She nor Brad has mentioned how many kids they wanted together in the past two years.
- Angelina doesn’t say stuff like Knocked up
- there wasn’t one picture of Angelina in India with the reporter
- the interview was very cut and past. there was no flow
- Angelina wouldn’t diss mormons. I don’t know why but I don’t think she would
- The part about Brad dancing and Zahara screaming didn’t make any sense
- A reporter flew all the way to India for the interview? Even for Brad’s Esquire interivew, the interview didn’t fly to Namibia.
- They mentioned the yellow make up Angelian had to for the The Good Shepard. They made it sound like the person who did the make up for her in TGS was the same person who did her make up for her in A Mighty Heart. That doesn’t make sense. Don’t movie productions have different stylists?
anon Says:
Her Madonna quotes made perfect sense to me.
to GUSSIE = Hey Med!
I wish that my English was better to tell you the things I would like to but I’ll do my best with what I have.
My close friend and her husband are very fertile people. They had their first kid when they believed that they had protection like condom and sponch (?) and top of it the day was not the day she was supposed to get pregnant. Not even one, THREE protection all together. And she got pregnant. It was even found a suprise by her own doctor.
Same friend and the same husband decided to have a second child. No protection at all and regular sex, specially on the days she is supposed to get pregnant, it took them 5 “FIVE” YEARS to get pregnant for the second child.
They don’t smoke, they drink wine occasionally, eat well, no other problem with their health. When they had their first baby as an “accident” with all these THREE protection, they believed that the second time will much easier which means NO STRESS at all; at least at the beginning.
The second pregnancy was very much planned with all things including the vitamins. But it didn’t happen as they expected.
Now, do not lecture me with all these long comments. I know what I am talking about. I am 4O years old and have a daughter who is 3 and pregnant with the second.
Frustrated Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:24 pm
The nerve….you’re obviously, not as worried about the country as you claim or you won’t be here worrying about what we worry about…, nah, you’d be picketing in front of the whitehouse….completely oblivious to a celebrity blog called JJ and the people posting on it. So much for your concern, eh?
Okay, that was not nice….Me doubting your concern for this great country just because you are posting here….was uncalled for. Why, for all I know, you could be writing letters to congress and posting on JJ at the same time…or you could be on the phone with someone who knows someone who can make changes…while reading the posts on JJ or maybe you’re here because you’re taking a break from all your letter writing and phone calls….The point is, I made a snap judgement about your concern just because you are here and like I said…it was uncalled for. So… What do we do now?
I don’t think the Elle interview was fake, because the press made a big deal of the shiloh comment and if the interview was fake it was the perfect chance to say so, just look how fast she made a stament to people in the Gala-Madonna quotes.
I just read the access hollywood stuff that David A. said. He ( refering to Brad) did some stuff to hurt our friend. So, JA is blameless in the her marraige failing? Your friend did nothing to contribute to it or nothing to hurt Brad? So, once again she gets her friends to do her speaking for her. David looks like such a puppet.
What I don’t get is why are they talking about Brad at all wasn’t Vince JA last boyfriend? Isn’t that the relationship she should be getting over not the one with Brad? What does that say about her relationship with Vince if she is still having her friends talk about Brad. She is one sick puppy.
452
gitane Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:36 pm
oh, speaking of vogue…does anybody need a copy of angie’s? i’ve got two.
————————————————————————————————
No Gitane, but thanks anyway :)
Alex -
relax, it was your post which you did way back. someone repost it because it’s very good.
not trying to use your name.
anon Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:55 pm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Angelina address the Gala interview because it involved someone else, David and Madonna. If it comes to herself, she doesn’t care, but if it involves someone else, then it’s important to clear it up.
Angelina did all these recent interview to promoter her movies.
Just like every celeb does. But because there is so much attention on what she does, her interviews become headlines. Movie studios require that the stars do interviews to promote their movies. That’s what she was doing. She’s always been very open. So why should she hold back now?
NonBeliever Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:54 pm
Frustrated
I forgot to add. I have had some nut following me around so my name was changed. I go by NonBeliever. In case you didn’t understand my post Frustrated :)
Alex -
please dont change your name.
please read post 438 who said it well.
Did People.com pick up any of the Elle quotes?
457
Frustrated Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:46 pm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sorry, but your logic is somewhat flawed.
Yes, Brad and Angelina are very active and very aware, even to the extent of their spending large amounts of their time invested in their causes, but they aren’t compelled to invest every single moment of their lives on it. Yes, they bring their experiences home, but home is home. It is doubtful that either of them would swat Maddox, Zahara, and Shiloh away if any of them came forward with a need. Neither of them would say ‘Go away, boy or girl… you’re distracting me from my thoughts about the state of the world.
Get this concept… there’s a time and place for everything and it isn’t selfish to occupy minutes, hours, etc. to triviality, especially when the vast majority of time spent in a day is for essentials. You don’t really know any of us, so who the h@ll are you to wag your finger at what we hold dear. I can tell you that BAMZS occupy less than .009% of my thoughts. I don’t share the 99.991% of my thoughts on this board because, while I’m cool with some on this board, my woes shouldn’t become their woes.
I’m through wagging my finger at you; I wonder if you have spread your message of searching for depth or meaning in life on Perez Hilton, DListed, PITNB, etc.
Pages: « 1 … 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 … 24 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!