Top Stories

Brad Pitt Back to Being Benji Button

Brad Pitt Back to Being Benji Button

Brad Pitt is back filming The Case of Benjamin Button! He was spotted earlier today on the streets of New Orleans filming scenes in a nearly unrecognizable costume. Is that really him? Why yes, yes it is.

Pictured in this entry: Some old pictures of Brad Pitt in L.A. late last month supposedly “waiting patiently at his office for a look at some artwork painted by one of his friends.” Hawt.

brad-pitt-sunglasses-01.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-02.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-03.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-04.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-05.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-06.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-07.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-08.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-09.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-10.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-11.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-12.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-13.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-14.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-15.jpg
brad-pitt-sunglasses-16.jpg


JJ Links Around The Web

  • Nancy O'Dell leaves Access Hollywood - PopEater
  • Jude Law miscounts his kids on Letterman - PopSugar
  • Jessica Biel wraps The A-Team and heads home - LaineyGossip
  • Beyonce's parents may be getting divorced - Dlisted
  • Taylor Lautner gears up for Cancun - JustJaredJr
  • Fran Drescher goes for a swim - TheSuperficial
  • Demi Moore poses with a giraffe - Celebuzz
Frederick Breedon/Getty

594 Comments

Pages: « 117 18 19 [20] 21 22 2324 » Show All
NonBeliever @ 01/11/2007 at 3:07 pm

468
bluemoon Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 3:03 pm
I don’t think the Elle interview was fake,
——–

I do think its a fake. It was a fun read but there are some errors to it. UK and European magazines rarely get exlusives.

frustrated @ 01/11/2007 at 3:08 pm

African Girl, I like you and your intelligent comments. If you would like to be snarky, I have no problems. I’m saying my part. You have a right to disagree but I do think it needs to be said that they fans are becoming very hypocritical lately and it doesn’t do anyone any good.

464
me Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 2:57 pm
____

Murdoch has been served notice.

What does that mean?

To Aniston's Boobies @ 01/11/2007 at 3:10 pm

#
461
anon Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:55 pm

409
CLINIQUA Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 1:13 pm
__________________________________________________________________

Yeah thanks for allowing us slow kids the pleasure of your sarcasm. If you are so sure that ‘Angie cares’ so much about the tabloids and media, why does she not go correcting all the ridiculous stories that are printed about her every single day from 2005? Angie has ALWAYS given frank interviews about her personal life, ALWAYS. I know this because I’ve been a fan and read her interviews from years and years ago, so don’t start implying that she just started doing interviews about her personal life right now. Angie has corrected the media when it printed articles that affected someone else. That’s why she corrected the Madonna interview, she did the same thing with some interview in 2005 that said she had said something about comforting Brad on set, and she did it when it came to her daughter’s adoption. For years and years, they’ve written crap about her and that has never stopped her from talking. Heck, if she was so conscious about her PR strategy and image, she would not have fired the CAA agent she got in 2005 after only a few months with her.

Cliniqua…….. You Rock…..I’m just happy we’re on the same team!!
I love the way you ( brake it down ) …….Thanks!

words of advice @ 01/11/2007 at 3:13 pm

If you want to hurt David Arquette hit him where it hurts most. His wallet. Don’t watch the show dirt even to make fun of it. If his ugly mug or his overly botoxed master Courtney are on a cover of a magazine, don’t buy it. If they are on tv promoting the show turn the channel. Act like these two parasites and their dung pile aniston don’t exist. Mark my words by this time next year they’ll be begging producer Brad Pitt for a job.

482
words of advice Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 3:13 pm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

He also has a show on ABC, believe it or not.

He’s living the model that Brad was supposed to… wifey out in front now (and forever) or knifey in the back later (and, again, forever).

#
482
words of advice Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 3:13 pm

If you want to hurt David Arquette hit him where it hurts most. His wallet. Don’t watch the show dirt even to make fun of it. If his ugly mug or his overly botoxed master Courtney are on a cover of a magazine, don’t buy it. If they are on tv promoting the show turn the channel. Act like these two parasites and their dung pile aniston don’t exist. Mark my words by this time next year they’ll be begging producer Brad Pitt for a job.
+++++++++++++++++

Haha, I like your spirit. So very true.

African Girl @ 01/11/2007 at 3:28 pm

61
anon Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 2:55 pm

409
CLINIQUA Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 1:13 pm
First of all…let me address this ‘Brad should speak out’ business.

I find this fascinating. So was it angie’s “not caring” attitude that caused her to come out and say the Gala quote were falsehoods and took her words out of context?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You’re kidding right? AJ came out to refute the falsehood in the Gala mag because it had to do with something very important - ADOPTION. How do you not get that? Did she come out to refute rumors that she does not love her daughter? Did she come out to refute the tabloid c r a p that stated she and BP were broke up.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Was Angie “not caring” when she went on the ridiculous PR campaign and her newfound “tell all” strategy about her family starting with the Vogue interview and going on through the UK Elle “blob” interview?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Aaah….I see the problem here, you are confusing- seating down for an interview to talk about things that matter to you…..with caring enough about rumors to refute them. Apples and oranges my dear….apples and oranges. To be honest, I am not in the mood to explain it to you….anyone wanna help me out here.? Oh by the way…”Newfound tell all strategy?”…LMOA, you obviously haven’t read any of her past interviews.

Cox had that Dirt show.

I guess no one know David has that comedy show on ABC called something In case of emergency with very bad rating.

Which explain the need for him to talk about Brad. loser

think positive! @ 01/11/2007 at 3:30 pm

409
CLINIQUA Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 1:13 pm
———————
Thank you for that.It was a very good read.

480
To Aniston’s Boobies Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 3:10 pm
—————————
Brilliant post. Just another JA fan who is clueless about some certain facts.

Andrómeda @ 01/11/2007 at 3:34 pm

Gitane: I don´t have that copy of Vogue Magazine. It would be great if you could send it to me…but I live in Argentina, so I think it will cost you a lot, and that is why I think is okay if can´t do it.
Thanks anyway.

Alexanderina @ 01/11/2007 at 3:39 pm

471
not an imposter Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 3:03 pm
Alex -

relax, it was your post which you did way back. someone repost it because it’s very good.

not trying to use your name.

474
not an imposter Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 3:05 pm
Alex -

please dont change your name.

please read post 438 who said it well.

=====================================================
Yeah I realize that now, that it was just someone who repost my post from Brad’s Birthday’s Thread, I believe, it was just a shocked to see a post was posted with my name, but I am cool now, cause I know the person who repost it was a BAMZS fan and not a troll :)

African Girl @ 01/11/2007 at 3:39 pm

478
frustrated Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 3:08 pm

African Girl, I like you and your intelligent comments. If you would like to be snarky, I have no problems. I’m saying my part. You have a right to disagree but I do think it needs to be said that they fans are becoming very hypocritical lately and it doesn’t do anyone any good.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Okay…how have the fans become very hypocritical? By the way, i wasn’t being snarky….I made an assumption about you, based on something as ridiculous as you posting on a blog, realizing it was wrong of me to do that, I corrected it. I could easily have remained on my incorrect stance and carried on about the fact that you’re not picketting in front of the whitehouse….instead, you’re here on a celeb blog but I didn’t….so I don’t understand what you mean.

African Girl @ 01/11/2007 at 3:42 pm

Alexanderina
Oy….thank goodness the misunderstanding has be cleared. I didn’t think you with another name will be the same.

I’ve brought this comment from earlier here, because i liked it:

#
156
bunch of loonies Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 1:22 am

OMG. BRAD is one f.c.u.k.i.n.g. hot bas.tar.d. I mean what other man gets people everywhere so riled up even 2 years after the breakup and what other man still have their ex so obsessed that she is still trying after two years of headlines?

No matter what is said about Brad and no matter how much they might bash him the simple matter is that PEOPLE CAN’T GIVE HIM UP. Period. Yup. Just look at the Fraudiston. She has had her puppy publicist connect her to Brad for over two years now and it seems like the strings are not going to be cut is Huvy and the Fraud has anything to say about it. She can’t give him up. That is the simple truth. The Fraudfans knows this and that is why they are still so pissed.

So just take it as a compliment to just how darn irresistible; just how f.c.u.k.ing good in bed Brad is; just how sublimly irresistible he is. No wonder they can’t give him up. Protest they might, but fascinated and pissed that he is gone - check.
#

469
Peaches Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 3:03 pm
…..
What I don’t get is why are they talking about Brad at all wasn’t Vince JA last boyfriend? Isn’t that the relationship she should be getting over not the one with Brad? What does that say about her relationship with Vince if she is still having her friends talk about Brad. She is one sick puppy.
***************************************

I think Aniston and Co. are mum about VV because of the humiliating, and in a way, anti-climactic manner that the JA-VV “relationship” came to an end–c’mon VV exposed for fooling around with some tourist co-ed? Doesn’t do wonders for Aniston’s image to publicize that a cool guy’s man’s man (as VV’s image is portrayed) would rather fool around with a ditzy sorority girl than spend time with America’s supposed sweetheart. Much better to steer clear of discussions of VV because if such discussions come up, the pity that will be thrown at Aniston will be genuine “it sucks to be you” pity, not the righteous indignation of people who are projecting their bitterness from previous relationships onto the JA-BP-AJ triangle.

First Brad then VV–you think people would see a pattern so as to at least consider the possibility that there might be something about Aniston that doesn’t work in relationships right now. Could be bad luck but it could also be that she’s not in a place where she can keep a relationship intact–who knows. But some people and tabloids would rather keep thinking that Jolie did some voodoo on Brad and lured/seduced him away from Aniston. Is it because that Aniston is so held so high in people’s esteem that these people think that only the dark magic of Jolie can “steal” a man that was already firmly in her clutches? Lol! People apparently are ignoring VV and his sexy co-ed!

As for DA and CC, I think that perhaps they got the idea to produce Dirt not because of what they or Aniston have been subjected to in the tabloids or by the paparazzi but rather, what PR stunts they and/or their publicists pull behind the scenes (perhaps even as we speak). It’s worth pondering a bit ;)

^^^^^^

Disagree. I like Brad but I would have never paid attention to Brad if not for Angelina. If he had decided to date any other woman, I probably couldn’t care less. Angelina is very facinating and that’s why she gets most of the blame and attacks from the public and media.

I don’t want to stir up a pot of worms, but that article in Women’s Day/World? that said Brad met X at C Keener’s house and then went to dinner at II Sole, why would they print Keener’s name? Can’t she sue them for using her name if the story is false? There is something about her laying her head on Brad’s shoulder that distrubs me. Plus the fact that she appeared in that movie and went to the Sundance with X. Do you think Brad actually met with X? Why involve CK if the story is not false. Someone needs to say something about this. I apologize for not remembering names. There are just so many names and so many threads, so many comments. Please someone respond. I would hate for this story to be true. I don’t want Angelina hurt or ridiculed by the press or the fannatics. Peace

Alexanderina @ 01/11/2007 at 3:50 pm

491
African Girl Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 3:42 pm
Alexanderina
Oy….thank goodness the misunderstanding has be cleared. I didn’t think you with another name will be the same.

=====================================================
Hiya AG, I so agree, but it is cool now :). Girl, it has been a freaking crazy week hasn’t it, I am telling you AG I can’t wait for this week to be over with. The GG can’t come fast enough. You know with all these bullshits that are going on, it will only make Brad and Angie stronger.

lookee what’s going practically unnoticed on jared’s main page:

Not good news for the Dirt. Courteney Cox’s salacious new drama dropped 35% in the ratings this week.

mayhap SIIHW won’t get the chance to guest star on her girlfriend’s show and make her big comeback before it gets CANCELLED!

461
anon Says:

I find this fascinating. So was it angie’s “not caring” attitude that caused her to come out and say the Gala quote were falsehoods and took her words out of context?

Hey! Pay attention. Are comprehension skills nil? You’re what’s wrong with our dumbed down society today. You can’t read worth sh*t. There’s a difference between a publication making up stories, and getting fake ’sources’ to weigh in and a publication actually putting words/quotes in your mouth that you did not say.

Was Angie “not caring” when she went on the ridiculous PR campaign and her newfound “tell all” strategy about her family starting with the Vogue interview and going on through the UK Elle “blob” interview?

Again what part of ‘reading is fundamental’ do you NOT understand? I said Angelina did not care about the made up tabloid stories and lies. I didn’t say Angelina did not care about promoting her movies - the very thing that she has said allows her and her children to live in the lifestyle they do, and affords them opportunities to do for others. Angelina, is one of the most professional actors out there, she does not, NOT look a gift horse in the mouth. She does the press junkets, the mags, the covers - because it gets her projects seen and her causes talked about and allows her to share the wealth. How is doing an interview in Vogue or Vanity Fair talking about her life and work, the same as NE writing that that Jonny Lee Miller is the father of her baby, you idiot plant?

Face it. Angie really isn’t that hard to read. She ignores the press when it doesn’t suit her and plays to them and manipulates them when it does suit her.

It’s called PROMOTION dumb ass. “Manipulation,” is what Maniston did when she cried and writhed on the floor like a d*mn fool in her underwear in Vanity Fair while slurring her ex, Angelina and the children - Maniston had an agenda…promoting HERSELF as the third wheel and third side of the mythical ‘triangle’ — she had NO movie to promote, only her fug untalented TV hack self to present to the world for PITY’S sake…THAT is playing to the public and manipulating them. You won’t hear from Angie unless she’s DOING HER JOB for her FILMS, or her UN work.

Her quote about Madonna were ridiculous, whether taken out of context, lost in translation or whatever. She realized she was getting heat for it and getting slammed for it and put out a statement.

It’s clear to everyone Madonna was way too hasty. Who in hell wants to have to give a parent a weekly update on the progress of their kid? But that’s the situation she’s found herself in - taking care of Mr. Banda’s kid, and supporting him on the fly. Angelina, despite Madonna’s obvious mess, has always been positive about what she’s heard of her situation, saying we should support the woman, unlike 99% of the public who think Madonna is only grand-standing and trying to COPY Angelina. Bizarrely now, types like yourself are attacking Angie. I know a troll and a plant when I smell one. Tell Huvane he can go F*CK himself. Angelina, unlike your idol Maniston, would not call another person (in this case a reporter) a LIAR to save herself. That’s YOUR ‘TV’ GIRL’S m.o. If AJ says her quotes were twisted and misconstrued they were - I’ve read 10 different versions of her press conference she did in NYC….everyone has, so quit acting like a blind, deaf and dumb mute…when you know you only have the dumb part covered.

It may not have been something superficial regarding a baby bump like a lot of the stupid rag headlines but don’t act like she’s so above it all. She knows how her bread gets buttered.

See above eejit.

And, by the way, I’m glad to know that your boycott of certain gossip sites and magazines affected their editorial staff enough for them to “change” their tone. Next I think you should start boycotting certain gas stations to see what you can do to get OPEC to bring down the cost of oil. I’m very impressed with your influence. (for you slow kids, this is known as sarcasm).

The Citgo Oil & Gas campaign is in it’s 2nd year and it’s the cheapest gas around - but hey, feel free to keep wasting your money you dumb b*tch.

488 Andrómeda

postage to argentina for a mag can’t be all that bad. i used to ship stuff home from spain all the time. i even sent myself a fondue set from switzerland once. i’ll never do that again…jeesh! but hey, if you want to pony up for the postage, i’ll be happy to send the vogue your way.

497
gitane Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 3:50 pm
lookee what’s going practically unnoticed on jared’s main page:

Not good news for the Dirt. Courteney Cox’s salacious new drama dropped 35% in the ratings this week.

mayhap SIIHW won’t get the chance to guest star on her girlfriend’s show and make her big comeback before it gets CANCELLED!
**************************

Lol–I was part of the 35% drop woohoo! I was considering taking another peek at that train wreck but I think it would be much better if I help the ratings drop by resisting!

piper, with a low @ 01/11/2007 at 3:54 pm

I know that this has been discussed, but I wanted to add to the ‘Angie needs a PR rep’. discussion. The only reason anyone really needs a PR rep is to either get their name ‘out there’ or to relay information when they are unavailable to do so. Brad and Angelina’s names are already ‘out there’; when BAMZS are out of country, or rather out of LA/HW, that’s when we usually hear from Brad’s rep.

Now ____, b@t^h’s name is already ‘out there’ and add the fact that she rarely leaves the States and is rarely, physically, unavailable for comment, plus she’s a huge blabbermouth, well, mumblemouth, and her catty friends operate under a similar directive, there is no real necessity for a PR person, unless she’s not satisfied with the extent that she is ‘out there’, and to relay information that she’s too chicken$h*t to utter, ie getting dumped twice, accepting/acknowledging her part in the divorce, expressing her true feelings about herself and her life, etc.; therefore she enlist the PR person to get information and/or lies out there so she can remain distanced from any fallout or negativity.

On that basis, Angelina definitely doesn’t need a PR person.

Pages: « 117 18 19 [20] 21 22 2324 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.