Brad Pitt Going to Golden Globes?

Wow, these threads blow up faster scud missiles.
Brad looks really happy…good for him. Good for “Babel” with the seven nominations.

I’ve been reading this stuff the “They won’t last….” from the haters since year 2005. but whose relation when kaput in less than 1 yr - Jen and Vince. thats karmza.

135
Ahem Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 7:53 pm
The only Ent show that was whack was E and the Insider. The Insider did a cut up job of David’s interview but all the other and especially Access Hollywood allowed you to watch David in full context. Howard was egging him on and David was joking and then he went into all kidding aside…

David though, man, between him giggling like a girl and being spaced out I don’t know which is worse. He’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer. You can see why CC lets JA hang with her 24/7. She needs to be able to conduct a conversation with someone

———————-

Agreed ahem. In the clip I saw on ET, he came across like he was drunk off his ass, and extraordinarily stupid. The fact that these shows ran this clip, says more about the power of Brad & Angelina to dictate the celebrate news cycle, than it did about David Cox revealing all. He came across as being too dumb and stoned out of his mind to know his own f*ckin’ name, let alone what went on in Brad’s personal life. That’s the only saving grace to any of this coverage, I don’t think anyone can take dude seriously after that appearance — he was slurring words, and looking and acting half sleep. I wouldn’t have been able to understand what he said, if I hadn’t also read a bit of the transcript earlier. If he did say, “all kidding aside..” it was buried in between slurs and the others talking over him. I thought the audio might help in that perhaps you’d hear laughter and it would be apparent he was joking, as is, to me comes across as wanting to be discuss what he thinks he knows about the situation, because he’s high as a f*ckin’ kite and has no inhibitions.

What I get upset about, and it’s not just this kind of celebrity bullsh*t news, but the entire news industry in the country, is that they leap to conclusions. Robin asks him, very clear and loud, ‘When did you know Brad was sleeping with Angelina?’ Now if he had actually answered the question with…a clear-cut oh we found out in December of 2004, because Jen found Angie’s thong under her pillow…..they would have something….as is, he remarks, slurring his words, talking stoned and slow, eyes half-mast, half giggling, speaking at the pace of a snail….’…huh..ehhh………well…that..was…a surrrprise…ehr.huh…

I was like you dumb piece of slow moving sh*t, that’s NOT an answer.

But of course, the media outlets don’t care.

David Arquette said he was surprised…which means he and Courtney were surprised….well…TELL ME…what were they surprised at??

…that Brad and Angelina were sleeping together??

Yes.

Okay, but WHEN did he find that out??

…well he didn’t say….

were they surprised because Brad was still WITH MANISTON when he was sleeping with Angie??

….well he didn’t say that.

well, um…were they surprised they got together AFTER he and Maniston split…??

Um, could be, but again, I couldn’t say.

Were they surprised that Brad and Angelina ended up together so soon after the split with Maniston…..

well, he didn’t specify…it could have been that…but I don’t know…all he managed to say was that ‘it was a surprise.’

Well then, I ask ALL YOU DUMB MOTHERF*CKERS who call yourselves ‘reporters’…..

What F*CKIN’ SECRETS WERE REVEALED?

It seems like these pissants are missing something? What was David Cox Arquette SURPRISED at?? That Brad, this great guy that he loves, that he text messaged on the birth of his child, that is such a GOOD guy…committed adultery and cheated?

Hmmm…if THAT were the case, and his ‘friend was hurt,’ from Brad ‘doing some stuff,’ …..and if the “stuff” was that he was f**king Angelina under ‘his friend’s’ nose….why THEN, would Arquette be showering Pitt with praise?!

It makes no sense.

Also, if he’s ‘revealing secrets’ as some of these crap infotainment shows want you to believe, those seem to fly directly in the face of HIS WIFE CC, (and Maniston)who said Brad did not cheat, and that he was honest with Jen - and who also said Brad is not a liar.

So again, I submit to all you haters and psuedo-reporters…what in the h*ll do you think you HAVE on Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie…it appears to me, they are the only consistent truth tellers in this whole business.

They also apparenty are content to let the Arquettes, the Cox’s and the Manistons of this world go up in flames for trying to sling mud at them right before a ceremony honoring Brad’s achievement TWO YEARS AFTER THEIR SPLIT, those pathetic TV HACKS.

By the way…I got this from Howard’s site:

BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU SAY

After a discussion about more rumors concerning a potential merger between SIRIUS and XM, Howard brought up that portions of his interview yesterday with David Arquette was already being printed on gossip Websites. Howard went on to read the topics covered in one of the articles, and admitted he was able to get a good deal of information out of David. Howard added he felt badly for David given some of the negative remarks people left for him on the Website he saw.

Heh. Looks like Howard might read JJ.

190
Passing Through Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 8:49 pm
Damn…I just finished reading the last thread…only to find out there’s a new one! Oh well…I was going to post this over there, but now I’ll put it here…

I’ve been MIA for a couple of days and I see all kinds of sh#t has hit the old fan.

I was going to comment on the David Arquette thing, but he’s not really worth the effort is he? Howard Stern baited the hook and reeled in a crapper.

Then I was going to comment on the Angie/Madge adoption issue and realized that’s not worth the effort either. If Angie wanted to say something bad about Madge she’d call her crusty old ass on the phone and tell her, she sure wouldn’t do it in a French tabloid.

After that I saw some folks were actually believing some bullshit tabloid from Oz about Brad having dinner with X on the QT and Angie blowing a gasket over it. Now that one I will comment on - are you people really that stupid? How in the hell do people 5,000 miles from US have a story that no US tabloid has? And just when in the hell did Brad have time to meet with X? He’s practically been glued to Angie and their kids for the last 18 months. Could ya just maybe use a little bit of common sense? If ya just think about how stupid that their lead-inwas, ya wouldn’t even have to finish more than the first paragraph to know it was totally made up.
=====================================================
ROTFLMFAO, good one PT :lol:

cary grant was known to have ritzy tastes. too bad it took him so long to settle down with one gal.

http://www.jossip.com/gossip/jossip-juxtaposition/jossip-juxtaposition-angelina-jolie-branded-a-hypocrite-for-calling-madonna-a-babysnatcher-20070111.php

175
fan Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 8:29 pm

Please note that I defended Ms Jolie.I stated that at the time she adopted Maddox there was no reasonable way she could have known that there was a problem with her agency.It was clear to me that the reporter was looking for a negative slant on the adoption and the controversy.I was glad to provide some balance to her report.
********************************

I got the same reply from David Ptasnisk from Americans Adopting Orphans. :lol:

190
Passing Through Says:
January 11th, 2007 at 8:49 pm

After that I saw some folks were actually believing some bullshit tabloid from Oz about Brad having dinner with X on the QT and Angie blowing a gasket over it. Now that one I will comment on - are you people really that stupid? How in the hell do people 5,000 miles from US have a story that no US tabloid has? And just when in the hell did Brad have time to meet with X? He’s practically been glued to Angie and their kids for the last 18 months. Could ya just maybe use a little bit of common sense? If ya just think about how stupid that their lead-inwas, ya wouldn’t even have to finish more than the first paragraph to know it was totally made up.
+++++++++++++++

ITA. people who believed that Aussie tabloid must be leaving in the cave. let them have their delusion and frustration later on.

123
Brad’s tiny weiner Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 7:44 pm

++++++++

I’ll bet you your next paycheck from Huvane that Brad’s weiner is bigger than your brain.

Please note that I defended Ms Jolie.I stated that at the time she adopted Maddox there was no reasonable way she could have known that there was a problem with her agency.It was clear to me that the reporter was looking for a negative slant on the adoption and the controversy.I was glad to provide some balance to her report.
********************************

Thanks for posting this :D

218
Passing Through Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 9:20 pm
You know I love me some Angie…but…let’s hope her dress is better than that shiteous number she wore to the TGS premiere. That sucker was downright matronly…despite Brad staring down the front of it! I think Angie needs to get her Sex Goddess on for Monday night. Something clingy and low-cut that’ll keep Brad’s mind off his nomination and on…other things…

******************************************

You know what? In pictures it was blah but live, when you see the videos it was beautiful. I think she was going more for the Shi, Z and Mad’s mom going to charity ball look as opposed to uber sex bomb. More “fashion” than sexy. The GG’s will not be as formal as the Oscars. I think she can carry “fashion” more than most becasue of her size. We’ll see. Look back at her past GG looks.
BTW, I love your snark and how you and Cliniqua cut through the cheese on this board. keep it up.

BBL.

19
gitane Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 5:36 pm
wait. the GG’s are on the same night as the 24 premiere? that’s a problem. thank god for PIP!

————————————————————————————————
Hiya Gitane, I know, I can’t believe it either. I will have to record “24″ because I CAN”T miss a second of it, but Gitane, remember that the premiere of “24″ is on Sunday and continue on Monday, so there is a 2 hours premiere on Sunday and then another 2 hours on Monday. I am the biggest “24″ fan in the whole world, I love that Show and I love Kiefer Sutherland aka Jack Bauer

241
bluemoon Says:

January 11th, 2007 at 9:44 pm
Please note that I defended Ms Jolie.I stated that at the time she adopted Maddox there was no reasonable way she could have known that there was a problem with her agency.It was clear to me that the reporter was looking for a negative slant on the adoption and the controversy.I was glad to provide some balance to her report.
********************************

Thanks for posting this

—————–

Yeah but it was the other person quoted in the article that was the *******. Did anyone e-mail that d*ckhead? lolol That article was particularly scuzzy in that it starts out trying to infer that Angie is facing the wrath of adoption agencies and adoptees everywhere….something like ‘Jolie faces a barrage of criticism from the adoption community! — or some such sh*t, and when you read it…they find one person, in one po-dunk so-called association who’s ripping on Angelina. One person (most likely a faniston, just getting her digs in), does not a rash of criticism, or wealth of criticism, or barrage of criticism…MAKE.