Wed, 17 January 2007 at 5:46 am
Sin City 2: Angelina Out, Rachel In
A source close to the production of Sin City 2 is claiming that Angelina Jolie is out of the running and Rachel Weisz is in. Director Robert Rodriguez has always wanted Angelina to star in his sequel Sin City 2: A Dame To Kill For but because of scheduling conflicts, it looks like Rachel might be taking on the role of Ava Lord. Rachel Weisz: A Dame To Kill For? Hmmmm…








Older









1,619 Comments
For all the money that Jen has, why didnt she pick up her mother’s living expense. Please remember, her mother is in LA indignant care.
I am NOT asking her to reconcile, talk, or see her mother. She can just WRITE A CHECK.
Charity begins at HOME
please please bamzs no the seacrest story today,please this man is a joke can we talk about something relate to the beautiful couple and childrens bamzs.Thank you, have a nice day.
973
paris27 Says:
January 19th, 2007 at 11:53 am
********************************
We can like whoever we want, what is your problem? Angelina has always had fans. Did you just wake up?
The problem with you is that you can’t tell the diference between Tabloid & Legit news. The tabloids exploit people just like you. They will run scenarios that never happend and put words in people’s mouth’s and you swallow it whole. Did you not see the video? She even smiled at him. First last year it was Isaac Mizrahi touching Scarlett Johannson’s breast on TV now Seacrest is imagining things and his sidekick on the radio program is putting words in Angelina’s mouth. .What about Penelope Cruz who is now the patron saint for Celebrities for what she did to Ryan on TV? Do the reseach if you want to know why people will know follow her lead when doing these inane interviews.
Frenchy, please tell us more about the Penelope Cruz thing. I have no idea what you are talking about. As for the other poster’s rant, YAWN. We have addressed those topics so many times.
people who think Angelina was being a ***** just wish that that is who she ls. she’s the most down to earth celeb ever. Brad and Angie were both a nervous wreck and Ange didnt want to leave the kids. thats why they didnt go to the after parties.
Please ignore Paris
979
ntt Says:
January 19th, 2007 at 12:15 pm
Frenchy, please tell us more about the Penelope Cruz thing. I have no idea what you are talking about. As for the other poster’s rant, YAWN. We have addressed those topics so many times.
We all know Cruz has been getting raves for Volver and may be the only threat to Helen Mirren for an Oscar. Cruz goes and talks with Ryan, bah, blah, blah..then he mentions something about Orlando Bloom and if the rumors are true..something like that…..She stopped talking and gave him this look like ‘you just crossed the line amigo”.
980
insider knows ja is completely out of the pic Says:
January 19th, 2007 at 12:16 pm
Why didn’t she want to leave the kids?
Ryan was doing his job. he did not go chasing after her, she walked up to him knowing full well he may ask questions she may not like. The questions were not unusual, and Jolie has always invited questions and answered in an open manner - - when she was promoting GS, she was asked about more babies and she offered, “I’m on the pill.” That’s extremely personal. Nevermind the fact of award shows years past where she’s always made a spectacle of herself whether with BBT and talking about how they just had sex in the limo to tonguing her brother. (Again, this is not the point and in fact this is why I used to like her but now she spouts off about how she deplores the exact things that made her unique and admirable) Marc Anthony stayed off the podium thereby allowing JLo to speak/have the spotlight. The stars go on all the nighttime and morning shows for pr before a movie or whatever comes out. They are always ask the same questions over and over. I think it is refreshing when Ryan or others ask other things. It breaks the monotony. Maybe Ryan asked questions that didn’t fall into her talking points. I think she may have been caught off guard as she memorizes her talking points when she’s plugging something.
Thanks for making sense. #962
983
what happened Says:
January 19th, 2007 at 12:40 pm
980
insider knows ja is completely out of the pic Says:
January 19th, 2007 at 12:16 pm
Why didn’t she want to leave the kids?
Angelina said “we left one crying” I guess thats what she meant.
956
Peaches Says:
January 19th, 2007 at 10:58 am
and I also think Brad and Angelina will also be starting on BIO Baby #5 VERY soon after an adoption (or she could be pregnant right now, according to all those rumors, lol), just based on the remark AJ made on ‘wanting to raise their kids while young.’
IA. They want a large family and she said they didnt want to still be having children ten years from now. They want to have this large family and just raise their children. In cases like that the children are going to have to be close in age for that to be accomplished. That is probably why she mentioned just wanting to be a housewife for a while. Kate C. married to Steven Speilburg had two babies at one tme, one adopted, one biologial, that were only a couple of months apart in age.
I’m thinking they will adopt one more and have one more, that would make 5.
———————-
I agree Peaches.
I think so too, she’ll be pregnant sometime this year I bet..if she isn’t already. I also think she’ll sneak another bio in (or 2), when she’s like, Maniston’s age. Muahaha. heh.
984
paris27 Says:
January 19th, 2007 at 12:43 pm
Ryan was doing his job. he did not go chasing after her, she walked up to him knowing full well he may ask questions she may not like. The questions were not unusual, and Jolie has always invited questions and answered in an open manner - - when she was promoting GS, she was asked about more babies and she offered, “I’m on the pill.” That’s extremely personal. Nevermind the fact of award shows years past where she’s always made a spectacle of herself whether with BBT and talking about how they just had sex in the limo to tonguing her brother. (Again, this is not the point and in fact this is why I used to like her but now she spouts off about how she deplores the exact things that made her unique and admirable) Marc Anthony stayed off the podium thereby allowing JLo to speak/have the spotlight. The stars go on all the nighttime and morning shows for pr before a movie or whatever comes out. They are always ask the same questions over and over. I think it is refreshing when Ryan or others ask other things. It breaks the monotony. Maybe Ryan asked questions that didn’t fall into her talking points. I think she may have been caught off guard as she memorizes her talking points when she’s plugging something.
————————————————————————————————
You just proved why Ryan Seacrest is a liar. Angelina’s last awards show was three years ago at the Oscars where she was a presenter. She did not make a spectacle of herself. BBT has to share in on the spectacle as he is one all unto himself. But he was her husband. The past is the past. Why can’t you get that?
You seem ridiculous talking about things that happend years ago. Enough with that recycled sh__t
984
paris27 Says
——
TGS was HER film, her turn to answer questions. BABEL was HIS film, and he was all but ignored and the mike was shoved in her face. Whe she tried to deflect the questions, Ryan was too ignorant to buy a clue. That is all on him, She wasn’t the only one to ignore his questions, why does he dwell on her? He knows people have the right to ignore his questions, especially when they’re personal, or involving a 3rd party. You’re just as clueless as he is, get lost!
There’s an interesting poll on the website for the entertainment newspaper Variety. It’s “Who do you think will win an Academy Award.” (Not who do you want to win) The choices for Best Picture include Babel and The Good Shepherd. Angie is a choice for Best Supporting Actress but, this is the interesting part, Brad isn’t a choice for either Best Supporting or Best Actor. There is an option to write names in, so if anyone felt that Brad was going to win they could still say so. But there are a lot of names there and one would think that he’d be there because he was nominated for a Golden Globe. Variety is well read and in tune with what’s happening within the movie industry, so, putting all of that together with the lack of a SAG nomination for Brad, it looks like we might not be seeing him on the podium this year. I’m sure, no matter what, we’ll see them on the Red Carpet, anyway, for Babel, The Good Shepherd and The Departed. I just want to see both Brad and Angie win, but I guess I’m being too greedy.
http://www.variety.com/awards_personalize.asp?layout=awardcentral&content=jump&jump=oscar_nomination&nav=tracker
On another topic, in this picture, and in others where Brad’s eyes look have closed, he is actually staring at Angelina’s lips. ;0)
http://img16.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=66236_HQCB.net_Angelina_Jolie_117_122_371lo.jpg
Good evening to all,
Most probably, Angie and Brad will adopt 2 more, one from the country of Maddox, the other one from Zahara’s. And Angie will give a birth one more time. That’s my opinion.
This Ryan guy got what he wanted, he asked stupid questions and pissed off Angie, now it has been 5 days everybody has still talking about him, writing comments concerning his interview. There is NO BAD PR, right?
If he asked the questions which have been expected to be asked, do any of you think that you would have talked about him for 5 days or more?
This is my 3rd attempt at posting this, and I’m not receiving anything about “awaiting moderation.” So if it shows up 3 times, that’s why!
There’s an interesting poll on the website for the entertainment newspaper Variety. It’s “Who do you think will win an Academy Award.” (Not who do you want to win) The choices for Best Picture include Babel and The Good Shepherd. Angie is a choice for Best Supporting Actress but, this is the interesting part, Brad isn’t a choice for either Best Supporting or Best Actor. There is an option to write names in, so if anyone felt that Brad was going to win they could still say so. But there are a lot of names there and one would think that he’d be there because he was nominated for a Golden Globe. Variety is well read and in tune with what’s happening within the movie industry, so, putting all of that together with the lack of a SAG nomination for Brad, it looks like we might not be seeing him on the podium this year. I’m sure, no matter what, we’ll see them on the Red Carpet, anyway, for Babel, The Good Shepherd and The Departed. I just want to see both Brad and Angie win, but I guess I’m being too greedy.
http://www.variety.com/awards_personalize.asp?layout=awardcentral&content=jump&jump=oscar_nomination&nav=tracker
973
paris27 Says:
January 19th, 2007 at 11:53 am
————————
You’re full of sh*t.
I never spout off at anyone unprovoked, and if I call someone a mofo (what you’re alluding to I guess) they deserve it — like you do, mofo.
Also, Angelina never made any comment about award shows being ‘a waste of time and money.’ ‘Lyin’ Pee Crust’ and his sidekick on the radio made that crap up.
Angelina was polite and reserved, and hopeful that ‘Lyin Pee Crust’ would focus on Brad, dissappointingly, and as he NOW dumbly admits, Angelina ticked him off, shook him off his game, and so he was obsessed with getting her to answer him at all cost, even to the point of wasting precious time with Brad, and trying to force Angelina to answer him by ’sticking the mic in her face and letting it sit!’ Meanwhile Brad, the nominee of critically acclaimed important film, is standing patiently by waiting for ‘Pee Crust’ to stop obsessing over his woman, and maybe ask him a question about..oh, you know..BEING NOMINATED…and ummmm….THE FILM, before he turns gray. THAT is outrageous.
‘Pee Crust’ has been outed, he’s displayed his ugly b*tchy cattiness for all the world to see.
982
GG’s are over Says:
January 19th, 2007 at 12:28 pm
We all know Cruz has been getting raves for Volver and may be the only threat to Helen Mirren for an Oscar. Cruz goes and talks with Ryan, bah, blah, blah..then he mentions something about Orlando Bloom and if the rumors are true..something like that…..She stopped talking and gave him this look like ‘you just crossed the line amigo”.
==============
Thank you so much for answering. I remember someone posted about it before, but completely forgot about it. Good for Penelope Cruz. Just because you work for a tv network covering a movie award show, it doesn’t mean you can poke in an actor’s private life, with tabloid speculations. These are big A-list movie stars, not the like of tv starlettes. He is getting complacent. And just because the actors appear in movies, doesn’t mean they have to oblige you with every details of their private life.
As for who deserves this year’s BA award, I saw both movies, and I think the role PC played is much more difficult and diverse than HM’s role. And I hope they don’t give the award to Meryl Streep, even though she is an indisputably talented actress. But not this year, because she was less in the movie than Anne Hathaway, and there was not much range to the character. Penelope Cruz deserves to win this year.
973
paris27 Says:
January 19th, 2007 at 11:53 am
————————————————————————————————
YES! Someone who actually makes sense! I like coming here and reading what everyone has to say because 80% of the time the discussion is interesting and informative about Brad. But I never post because of the very facts you pointed out!
I applaud you paris27 for saying what needed to be said. Of course, now you know it’s OFF with your head. lmao……
Maybe by the time Shiloh is 1, there will be a new member of the Jolie-Pitt family. I think the pattern will be the same as before. Adopt, then a few month’s later get pregnant. I’m so happy that Brad & Angelina are fullfilling their dreams of having a large boisterous family. I could easily see them with 6 children. I could also see Angelina doing what Annette Benning has done. She made a couple of films here & there while getting pregnant & raising a family with Warren Beatty and being involved in charity. She’s managed to keep a toe in the Hollywood community while having other outside interests and committments.
Tres-Jolie-Pitt says…
I wish Annette Bening would star in more movies. She is my favorite actress over forty. She is a very classy lady and a great actress. May be this will be her year to get an Oscar.
973
paris27 Says:
January 19th, 2007 at 11:53 am
Very, very well said.
on to the smut and the editorial I promised on the Page Six blind item. Many, many, many of you have written to follow up, sorry for the delay - travel, awards, trying to stay warm in Park City. Still, the extra few days gave me more time to get some more information…recap below.
First a refresher on the Page Six Blind Item – a humanitarian who hooked up with a rock star friend in LA 5 months ago and got strung out on heroin. At the time, when only the item came out, I wrote that it sounded to me to be more Pam Anderson than Angelina Jolie.
Humanitarian: Pam is AIDs spokesperson for MAC Cosmetics, hardcore party rumours for years, contracted Hep C, commonly infected through needles, a long list of rock star connections…and of course, you have to admit, the girl looks bunk-f*ckin’ ROUGH.
However, in a subsequent column about Marilyn Manson two days later, screwed up in his own right, there was a mention of Marilyn’s friendship with Angelina, followed by the online dissemination of photos of a painting he created of her with nails popping out of her arm, which naturally led many to conclude that the heroin-using humanitarian is none other than Mrs Pitt herself, especially since she’s so thin and walks around pouting and reminding you of that Deep, Dark, Harrowing Past.
First of all, I have no idea if that is indeed the answer behind their mystery. It’s their blind item, not mine. I’m not sure how they go about giving clues and I’m not sure whether or not they deliberately drop red herrings to divert from the real culprit. All I can tell you is what is told to me about Angelina’s behaviour and the observation coming from my own sources.
Is she weird? Yes. Is she demanding? Yes. Can she be a *****? Hell yes. Has she had a troubled past? Absolutely. Did she make out with her brother? Uh huh. Did she use heroin in the past? Rumoured to, yes. Was she headed for self destruction not too long ago, pre-Maddox? Obvious and admittedly so.
But seriously y’all. The Pitts might be courting the media and they might do it very well but have you ever for a second characterised Angelina Jolie as America’s Goth Sweetheart and Favourite Homemaker?
Please.
The girl is a badass. She looks better with blood dripping from her lips and her neck than she does in a bikini sunbathing in Malibu. Angelina Jolie was Lindsay Lohan BEFORE Lindsay Lohan – a dysfunctional family, a dangerous and wild past, and the anti-everything that glossy Hollywood usually peddles.
In recent years however, since Maddox, since ditching BBT, since becoming involved with the United Nations, Angelina Jolie has said that she’s become a new person – the kind of person who no longer hurts herself, Earth Mother and Mother Theresa, saving the world one adoption at a time, criticising Madonna, pissing off the MiniVan Majority, playing perfect wife to Brad Pitt, shunning Hollywood and the luxe life.
According to the anti-Angelina movement however, the façade is starting to crack. According to some, Angelina is too f&cked up to be this mentally stable and too strong willed to be tied down and she buys babies and she hates The Chosen One and is going to ruin her baby’s life and now…courtesy of Page Six, she’s shooting up.
Because heroin is apparently so benign one can use it casually without fear of addiction. Because she supposedly used to be an addict and she fell off the wagon and when you fall off the wagon after a serious addiction, it is actually possible to have the self control to avoid the feast or famine syndrome, only using occasionally without affecting your work life and family life and self destructing all over again. Because that’s how addiction works? Because that’s how harmless heroin can be?
Okay. Sure. Why not?
But take this for what it’s worth – even though she’s absolutely freaky and manipulative and calculating and bitchy, even though she’s all those things, I absolutely agree – according to my sources, Angelina Jolie is not using heroin.
Angelina Jolie is a Goodwill Ambassador for the UN. Representatives of the UN are expected to go through medical procedures like immunisation and drug testing before and after missions on a regular basis. As you know, a Goodwill Ambassador is responsible for drawing attention to important issues advocated by the UN, Angelina’s star has certainly helped the organisation in the few years she’s been involved. And of course the UN is happy with the relationship, so long as her celebrity and her actions do not jeopardise the message and the work.
Which is why she, like all employees and representatives of the UN, is tested and tested often. Which is why I hear she has never been observed to be engaging in behaviour that would compromise the organisation. Which is why she hasn’t yet been fired. Which is why there hasn’t been a carefully worded statement announcing her intention to step back from her duties because she needs more time to care for her children.
If that were to happen, perhaps the suspicions might be founded.
Right now however I’m told she passes each drug test with flying colours. But then again, you are welcome to draw your own conclusions about cleverly avoiding detection. Conspiracy, coincidence, conspiracy, coincidence.
As for her body and her behaviour at the Golden Globes: does she exhibit signs of a junkie? Is she bored with Brad? Was she fidgety? Did she hate being there? Is she a smug ass ***** who can’t be bothered to speak to people?
I spoke with the always delightful Nelson Branco who had the privilege of being inside the ballroom that night, seated behind Kyra Sedgwick. Nelson is a writer for TV Guide and In Touch, a ‘Mo of course, and therefore as catty as they come and deliciously so, with the trademark gay man’s eye for detail and observation and a nose for the dirtiest smut ever, especially the kind barely noticeable to some, but absolutely 100% obvious to a Queen.
According to Nelson, the Pitts were lovely, Angelina did not leave the table once, she is extremely calm, she was engaged and chatty with her tablemates, she and Brad sipped water all night, they sat close together, and she is thin but not disgustingly so.
Nelson also said that Matthew Perry was nuzzling the neck and kissing the shoulder of his co-star Sarah Paulson who has had a longterm lesbian relationship with Cherry Jones for years…weird, non? Sorry, I digress. But I’m kind of bored now. Editorial over.
Pages: « 1 … 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 … 65 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!