Top Stories

Sin City 2: Angelina Out, Rachel In

Sin City 2: Angelina Out, Rachel In

A source close to the production of Sin City 2 is claiming that Angelina Jolie is out of the running and Rachel Weisz is in. Director Robert Rodriguez has always wanted Angelina to star in his sequel Sin City 2: A Dame To Kill For but because of scheduling conflicts, it looks like Rachel might be taking on the role of Ava Lord. Rachel Weisz: A Dame To Kill For? Hmmmm…

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Paris Hilton's on a billboard...and isn't happy - TheSuperficial
  • Levi Johnston and Jon Gosselin film together - Dlisted
  • David Beckham and Cruz sport matching 'dos - LaineyGossip
  • Carrie Prejean: Sex tape was "the worst mistake of my life" - PopEater
  • Penelope Cruz is bella in Rome - PopSugar
  • Taylor Lautner covers Men's Health's December issue - JustJaredJr
  • Check out Emma Watson's Elle Girl outtakes - Celebuzz
Photo: RHS/WENN

1,619 Comments

Pages: « 150 51 52 [53] 54 55 5665 » Show All

I will be the bigger person and say that I enjoyed that breakdown tremendously. LOL (Yes, and I know that saying I’m the bigger person is no conciliatory gesture - it is however, fact. lmao…jo…king…people…joking…) Seriously, I enjoyed that tremendously PT. I am sooo buying STAR. Whose got the yummiest pics of the rags? STAR should be commended (okay that was too extreme), for the story and for the butt ugly w/ plastic boobs smaller photo of Man on the cover, which I grabbed off their site earlier this week and linked here. I wonder if the hard copy is just as fug.

ROTFLMAO, PT. Now I know why I couldn’t go to sleep tonight. I was waiting for your tabloid report! To channel the Master Card ad :”Star mag and Lies&Style are $1.99 each. PT’s rendition, PRICELESS.” :lol:

TO: Passing Through @ 01/20/2007 at 6:48 am

Passing Through
you are too funny. Thank you for that. I’m sitting infront of my computer laughing like I’m on something and its all thanks to you. God if I could read your posts everyday about the tabs I think I would live longer. I can only imagine what its like to live with you.
again, thanks for that.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ………………………………………………………………..

whoops…almost forgot…I say all that to say thanks PT.

re 1299

….and so it’s spread to the la times, well at least they tried straddling the fence, they couldn’t resist bringing up past history even though the woman names but 3 award shows, and AJ’s attended about a dozen more, the most recent being the 2004 Oscars, where she was lovely and resplendent in white satin, she had the same demeanor as someone pointed out via links, to her demeanor at every other award show. Calm, serene, not overly smily when walking and posing.

Hey you insecure talking host monkeys and infotainment whores — Angelina wasn’t mad at you, or anyone - she wasn’t moody either…she was happy for Brad, as the many clips, and pics can attest…stop dissecting every twitch of her ******* brow and looking for reasons you can bring up ‘the blood vial’ and ‘kissing her brother,’ and I see this writer went for extra credit, we got ‘drug use,’ and ‘bisexual lovers’ (plural?…hmm shyeah), ‘tatoos,’ and the evil that is the evilest of all….’black leather jeans!’

…and please stop with the ever growing fabrication that you celebrity gossips are trying hard to make as fact, that Angelina, ‘doesn’t like going to award shows and would rather be helping the poor,’ firstly - AJ seems very adept at helping others AND living a great life, with benefits. She’s not one of these types to look a gift horse in the mouth, so why are they trying to destroy that which she herself has said actually enables her to do the charitable work she does.

Seriously, why are you people talking straight out of you ****!

It’s all so diabolical in my opinion, what they’re trying to make her out as now. It’s this newly created (and in my belief Huvane inspired) ‘backlash,’ and ooooh what a coinky dinky that it debuted the night Brad had HIS walk down the red carpet.

It almost seems designed to attempt to cause some kind of trouble between them. Let’s harrass Angelina so bad in the days after the red carpet, they both will want to avoid you nasty vultures and your horrible critical eyes dissecting every glance, every movement, and every infitismal slight expression and creating science fiction for the masses from it.

Here’s THE WORST of it - I don’t know how many of these so-called reporters do their research or if their too busy digging for stories up their a s s…but AJ talks of having to do such an event (award show) after going on her first field mission, she sees death and poverty, and disease, and violence…and she worried that, that once being back in HW, she’d think the event would be so shallow, and unimportant and frivolous, and she says she was SHOCKED, because she realized while there looking around, she just felt for everyone in the room, thinking of them getting ready, and dressing frantically saying goodbye to their kids, etc.

Well, a lot of people unfortunately are not that astute and they won’t/don’t GET what she’s saying here, REALLY saying….the others may get it, but they won’t acknowledge it, because they’re having too much fun hating on her, dragging up old sh*t from her past and pulling out the old ‘wild child’ file, breaking it down for everyone who perhaps missed some of this stuff…don’t worry AJ these types will be around in 15 years to talk about ‘the limo,’…..

But what Angelina is saying, is that what confronting some of the worst, most impoverished situations has done, what helping others has done, and what SEEING atrocities and how the human spirit can prevail in spite of them has done for her, IS MAKE HER MORE COMPASSIONATE FOR ALL PEOPLE (even the ‘Lyin’ Pee Crusts’ of the world), and in doing THAT - she is conveying that helping others FIXES those bad parts of you that perhaps would have been disdainfully looking down upon people gathered in a luxurious setting at an award show. Angelina is saying, HAVING THAT ATTITUDE, is the wrong one - it would have been the WRONG reaction to have….she knows this because her work in the field has given her more compassion for everyone.

..and isn’t it nice, that tabloid gossip pieces of sh*t, can write this pablum and totally make her into something she’s not, just recreate her for their readers that don’t know any better. They turn Angelina into an obnoxious full of herself young woman who looks down on those colleagues and peers who want to share in each other’s achievements, and it also makes of her a hypocrite, because despite these rag writers telling you she feels this way, they’re also telling you she’s right THERE at the show.

The young woman that voiced such a profound realization about HERSELF, and journeyed all the way to Darfur or the Sudan or Cambodia to see pain and suffering, was in turn given an inadvertent gift by the refugees on how she could better view all people….and just be a better human being amongst human beings when she got back to Hollywood.

The fact that this fact is trashed and ignored in the rush to ‘backlash Angelina,’ is pretty heartbreaking.

They want to make of her a cartoon (‘Snooty Angie, who’d rather be in Africa helping the poor than mingling with you rich pigs’ - did I get all of it Stephen? E!? Ryan? lol…great would you mind just wiring that to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences? That way when Brad doesn’t get nominated, the rags and tabs and E! and Ryan, can quickly begin their second round of missives that Angelina with her snooty, I hate award show attitude, RUINED BRAD’S CHANCES. I can see it now.)

Sometimes the media/press is the heart of all evil…to do that to such a wonderful person, with so many positive and profound experiences to share.

ploypaphat @ 01/20/2007 at 7:53 am

1293
Passing Through Says:

January 20th, 2007 at 5:03 am

**************************

Thank you! Thank you! for your hard work ;D
I love it … LOL :D

African Girl @ 01/20/2007 at 7:56 am

Was plagued by insomnia, so I decided to catch up….20 something pages. Jeez, you guys sure know how to have fun.

Passing Through - I lying in bed laughing my behind off and hoping I don’t wake the house. I swear….as soon as Jared gets the new site going, we must campaign for your own special thread “PT’s Tabloid Recap”. Honestly, you’ll have more hits than….than…whatever ever it is that has more hits right now. Apart from saving people a lot of money (hey, 1.99 is a lot of money somewhere), you also manage to strip the tabloids down to it’s core. I doubt anyone who reads your breakdown is gonna take tabloids seriously again. I tell ya, you will be doing a public servie. Thanks for the laughs and I agree with you Star is the Master.

Great….just great, now I’m all sleepy. I hate when that happens. Spend the night wide awake and as soon as the sun rises….my body is starts setting (I know, I know….that was horrible, Let’s blame it on lack of sleep)

African Girl @ 01/20/2007 at 8:02 am

Before I go back to sleep….

CLINIQUA - I see you got yourself a new friend. Man, you and PT always get fans….what am I doing wrong? Honestly I don’t get it. Me and you gots to talk….you must share your secrets….can’t have you hugging all the fans.

BBL

FORBES TOP 100 The Celebrity 100
1. Tom Cruise
2. Rolling Stones
3. Oprah Winfrey
4. U2
5. Tiger Woods
6. Steven Spielberg
7. Howard Stern
8. 50 Cent
9. Cast of The Sopranos
10. Dan Brown
11. Bruce Springsteen
12. Donald Trump
13. Muhammad Ali
14. Paul McCartney
15. George Lucas
16. Elton John
17. David Letterman
18. Phil Mickelson
19. J.K. Rowling
20. Brad Pitt
21. Peter Jackson
22. Dr. Phil McGraw
23. Jay Leno
24. Celine Dion
25. Kobe Bryant
26. Michael Jordan
27. Johnny Depp
28. Jerry Seinfeld
29. Simon Cowell
30. Michael Schumacher
31. Tom Hanks
32. Rush Limbaugh
33. Denzel Washington
34. Cast of Desperate
Housewives
35. Jennifer Aniston
35. Angelina Jolie
37. The Olsen Twins
38. Nicole Kidman
39. The Eagles
40. Rod Stewart
41. Shaquille O’Neal
42. Jerry Bruckheimer
43. David Beckham
44. Jessica Simpson
45. Andrew Lloyd Webber
46. LeBron James
47. Neil Diamond
48. Alex Rodriguez
49. Will Smith
50. **** Wolf
51. Dave Matthews Band
52. Tom Brady
53. Ronaldinho
54. Jodie Foster
55. Ray Romano
56. Paris Hilton
57. Adam Sandler
58. Derek Jeter
59. Jennifer Lopez
60. Rick Warren
61. Scarlett Johansson
62. Katie Couric
63. Maria Sharapova
64. Valentino Rossi
65. Halle Berry
66. James Patterson
67. Leonardo DiCaprio
68. Kiefer Sutherland
69. Jim Carrey
70. Cameron Diaz
71. Gisele Bundchen
72. Renee Zellweger
73. Carson Palmer
74. Michelle Wie
75. Reese Witherspoon
76. Bill O’Reilly
77. Kate Moss
78. Diane Sawyer
79. Sean (Diddy) Combs
80. John Grisham
81. Rachael Ray
82. Dave Chappelle
83. Larry the Cable Guy
84. Tyra Banks
85. George Lopez
86. Regis Philbin
87. Serena Williams
88. Ryan Seacrest
89. Wolfgang Puck
90. Venus Williams
91. Annika Sorenstam
92. Matthew Broderick/
Nathan Lane
93. Mel Brooks
94. Emeril Lagasse
95. Nicole Richie
96. Heidi Klum
97. Mario Batali
98. Eric Idle/
Mike Nichols
99. Adriana Lima
100. Ty Pennington

Price of Fame and Fortune @ 01/20/2007 at 8:19 am

Childless…the price of being famous

By Sarah Wescott

TO get ahead in the cut-throat world of showbusiness as a woman you should forget having children, it seems.

Well over half the 20 richest women in entertainment are childless, according to the first list of its kind.

Head and shoulders above the rest is talk-show host and international philanthropist Oprah Winfrey, who is now worth £750million.
Eleven other childless stars make the 20 Richest Women In Entertainment list compiled by Forbes magazine, including four more in the top 10.

A rift over whether to have children was reported to have played a part in the break-up of actress Jennifer Aniston and her husband Brad Pitt. He went on to become a father with actress Angelina Jolie, but the former Friends star – who is worth an estimated £55million – remains childless .

Cameron Diaz, whose hit movie There’s Something About Mary helped her to a fortune of £40million, has not ventured into motherhood.

Nor has actress Renee Zellweger – just like frustrated singleton Bridget Jones, whom she played in two films, helping her to accumulate a £25million fortune.

Janet Jackson has earned £75million through her singing career, although this has seemingly left her no time to start a family, and the same is true of Latino singer and actress Jennifer Lopez, who has earned £55million.

To build the foundations for a stellar career, women have to make sacrifices early on – and putting off having children appears to be one of the major ones. Helen Bartimote, a chartered psychologist, said many factors conspired against successful women in showbusiness choosing to have children. “There is a fear of what is going to be taken away from them if they have a child,” she said. “For men, there is simply not the same threat. “These are very driven, ambitious and powerful women who are very goal-orientated. They know they can put off having children and so they do. “Once they start becoming more successful in their careers, even more opportunities open up for them and they feel they have to take on more to stay at the top and compete with male counterparts.”
She added that there is also an element of addiction to fame – and fear of obscurity.
“There is the threat of younger women coming up and stealing their thunder,” said Ms Bartimote. “They are also concerned about being forgotten and being out of the limelight. Taking nine months off to have a baby might not be seen as the easiest option.”
But some on the list have found motherhood no bar to huge wealth.
Mother-of-three JK Rowling, 41, is the only Briton on it, but her massive earnings from the creation of young wizard Harry Potter shot her to second place.
And American TV celebrity Judge Judy has amassed £47million, despite raising five children.
Madonna, who has two natural children and one adopted, is at No4 in the league. “Our estimate of her net worth – £165million – is definitely on the conservative side,” said Lea Goldman, author of the report.

Finance magazine Forbes scoured the music, film, television and publishing industries in search of the female celebrities who have amassed the greatest fortunes in entertainment.
It included only “working” celebrities, not stars of the past like Barbra Streisand, who are mainly living off their royalties.
“Only a bona fide superstar can parlay a moment’s stardom into a long and lucrative career,” said Ms Goldman.
“And even that is not enough to land a coveted spot on our first-ever listing of the 20 richest women in entertainment.”
“Most of the women on our list cull their earnings from multi-media enterprises. Jennifer Lopez, for example, boasts valuable perfume and fashion lines in addition to her film and music careers.”

The Haves and Have Nots:
1) Oprah Winfrey £750m 0
2) J.K Rowling £500m 3
3) Martha Stewart £320m 1
4) Madonna £165m 3
5) Celine Dion £125m 1
6) Mariah Carey £115m 0
7) Janet Jackson £75m 0
8) Julia Roberts £70m 2
9) Jennifer Lopez £55m 0
10) Jennifer Anniston £55m 0

dragonfly @ 01/20/2007 at 8:23 am

Hay ya’ll! Wish I had something interesting to say this morning as I am rushing out the door, but I did want to say that PT, girl, thanks for the tabby report, you are priceless! The hilarity made my morning cup of coffee go down easy.

Cliniqua, you are dead on lady! I agree completely about all this “backlash” garbage. It’s all created and manufactured, and it is despicable. I have no doubt Brad and Angie are strong enough to remain unaffected by it, but I hate it, just the same.

I am also not on any baby or adoption trains yet. I don’t buy into anything that doesn’tcome right from the J-P’s or CindyG. It’s fun to watch it all unfold. Later!

fanistons needs a year of therapy…….they’ll give up when branjie are very old!

1293
Passing Through Says:

January 20th, 2007 at 5:03 am

Thank you for the recap. and the laugh.
I’m glad some of the tabs. (Us, star mag.) are finally accepting the truth.

” BLAMING THE OTHER WOMAN ISN’T REALISTIC. THERE HAD TO BE PROBLEMS TO BEGIN WITH FOR A MAN TO LEAVE HIS WIFE FOR SOMEONE ELSE. “MEN DON’T LEAVE HAPPY MARRIAGES.”
why does it took that long ( two years )for them to finally speak the truth ?

Passing Through Says
+++++++++++++++
Thanks for the recap, I fell of the chair laughing.

Have you guys seen the photos of Alicia Keys at the premiere of her new movie Smokin’ Aces. Her outfit and her hair reminded of how Angie looked at the L.A. premiere of Mr and Mrs Smith.
BTW I love them both and think they could totally swap outfits and look good in either.

1281
bunch of loonies Says:

January 20th, 2007 at 1:33 am
Oh yes I just wanted to add. Does anyone think it’s just a little odd that Cindy confirmed the NO house rumour?

****
I think CG felt the need to explain that the move is not permanent. From what I remember she has not confirmed that they purchased the home. But since all real estate purchases are made public, it can be assumed that the Mondo Bongo trust is own by Brad and Angelina.

What a great post Passing Through !!

watch star daily yesterday and this bonne fuller said about the infamous meeting of angie and the x (that would be her all thing)…that the x wasn’t happy about it!….sure!and that according a marriege expert=====no one can apart a husband,if the husband is happy…….bwahahahaha!correct!she also said that the marriege wer not solid!h!ll yeah!so true!!!!!.in my crazy hopenion…..i dont have the guts to that so called call meeting if brad didn’t till angie whatz going on with his marrieges.that would be the x most embarrasing setuation!

PT, loved your recap. encore, encore

1293 PT

You had me ROTFL and SOTS so much my side hurt. Don’t you just love those side chair expert?

Thanks for the lovely breakdown of the tabs!

Great post PT and as always I bow to Cliniqua’s analysis.

Don’t forget to support the Goddess:

http://www.hellomagazine.com/vote/mostattractivewoman/index.html

And the other one:
http://www.hellomagazine.com/vote/mostattractivewoman/index.html

What a joke to think that the afghan hound is in the running!

Lynn Campbell @ 01/20/2007 at 9:30 am

Thanks, PT, for the tab info!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Here’s an interesting article about Golden Globe choices vs. Oscar choices from St. Petersburg Times.

Some Globe winners will get Oscar’s cold shoulder
Professional jealousy and award-season overkill may leave some of the latest Golden Globe winners alone on the mantel without one of those other golden trophies for company.

By STEVE PERSALL
Published January 17, 2007

Don’t expect next month’s Academy Awards to follow the script provided by Sunday night’s Golden Globe awards.

Neither Babel nor Dreamgirls are locks for best picture Oscar nominations, even after respectively claiming the best drama and best musical-comedy prizes.

Part of the reason is professional jealousy. More than 6,500 Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences voters are tired of people believing that 88 Hollywood Foreign Press Association members tell them what to do — especially when it comes to choosing the year’s best film.

In the past two years, the academy voted to prove that after shifting its balloting time line to minimize the Globes’ influence.

Last year the Globes selected Walk the Line as best musical-comedy and Brokeback Mountain as best drama. The academy countered by giving its best picture statuette to Crash. The Aviator and Sideways won best picture Globes in 2005, and Million Dollar Baby stole away the top Oscar.

With only five best-picture nomination slots, academy voters will be pickier than Globes voters, who nominate 10 movies in separate best picture categories.

There’s also an overkill factor to be considered in the acting categories. Dramatic film winners Helen Mirren (The Queen) and Forest Whitaker (The Last King of Scotland) have claimed nearly all the best-of-the-year awards, with the Screen Actors Guild likely to agree.

Academy voters may decide enough is enough, as Sissy Spacek experienced in 2002 with In the Bedroom, when a similar streak snapped and the Oscar went to Halle Berry (Monster’s Ball).

All the Dreamgirls hype is bound to cause a backlash, prompting Oscar voters to wonder if Globes supporting actress winner Jennifer Hudson has paid her dues, or if merely a nomination is a proper reward. It could even dampen supporting actor contender Eddie Murphy’s advantage as a veteran making the kind of comeback Hollywood loves.

We’ll see when Academy Award nominations are announced Tuesday. Until then, here’s a few rare moments when the Globes show wasn’t as uninteresting as the Oscars are accused of being:

THE WINNER IS…NOT ME: Hope you noticed Entourage’s Jeremy Piven having a “Stephen Boyd moment” when Jeremy Irons (Elizabeth I) was named best actor in a television series or miniseries.

Kudos to the seating arranger who placed the competing nominees together, so we could see Piven emotionally implode when the “Jeremy” called to the stage wasn’t him. He barely managed getting his hands together to applaud. Not as melodramatic as Boyd collapsing in 1966’s campy The Oscar, playing egotistic actor Frank Fane in the same-name position (Sinatra wins), but close.

SPEECH IMPEDIMENTS: Any Globe winner with an Oscar in mind had better brush up on public speaking. Sunday’s acceptances ranged from unacceptable to academy tastes (Sacha Baron Cohen’s scatological comments) to downright dull (everyone else).

How winners may appear onstage can make a difference to some academy voters. You’d better believe that Roberto Benigni, Robin Williams and Michael Moore got votes just to see how far they’d push the envelope in Oscar remarks.

The academy wants to put on an entertaining TV show that will spark water cooler conversations the next day, but not one that’s so far out that the FCC gets involved.

Whitaker causing dead air because he’s emotionally overcome won’t work unless he goes the extra distance and starts sobbing. Mirren should loosen up by adding some of her suggestive comments reported from backstage.

Hudson can’t stay naïve forever; not thanking her co-stars suggests she isn’t. Murphy has floundered too long to be humble.

Don’t go all Cuba Gooding Jr. on us, but try harder.

BEST ACCEPTANCE GESTURE, PART 1: Best comedy-musical actress Meryl Streep (The Devil Wears Prada) urging complaints to theater managers when prestige films such as The Queen, Pan’s Labyrinth and Little Children aren’t playing: “It’s amazing how much you can get if you quietly, clearly and authoritatively demand it.”

BEST ACCEPTANCE GESTURE, PART 2: Justin Timberlake accepting the best song trophy for the absent Prince while ducking below the microphone, mocking His Shortness.

Passing Through…
Brava……………..!
I miss your humor around here………… :)

nut alert! @ 01/20/2007 at 10:06 am

Guys!

Nut Alert!

California…Paris 27… CPA…Lainey … and a host of other names, are
all one and the same.

Jolie voted most attractive woman

When it comes to her looks, Angelina Jolie can rest assured that there’s no other woman on the planet who can compete with her, for she recently topped a poll for the ‘Most Attractive Woman’.

The online poll, conducted by Hello magazine, saw 25 percent of readers and Jolie fans voting to make sure that the brunette mum-of-three topped the poll.

Coming in on the actress’ heels was TV series House MD star Jennier Morrison who laid claim to the second spot, reports Hello magazine.

She was followed by the woman Brad Pitt dumped in favour of Jolie – Jennifer Aniston, who was named the third ‘Most Attractive Woman’.

The top five was rounded of by the princess of pop Christina Aguilera, and reality TV star Nicole Richie, who came in fourth and fifth place respectively.

The list for top ten ‘Most Attractive Woman’, as per hellomagazine.com is:

1.       Angelina Jolie

2.       Jennier Morrison

3.       Jennifer Aniston

4.       Christina Aguilera

5.       Nicole Richie

6.       Queen Rania

7.       Emma Bunton

8.       Nicole Kidman

9.       Cate Blanchett

10.   Salma Hayek

PT, we are now so addicted to your tabloid reports, we DEMAND one from you, each Friday night. Like the SNL show, we are going to have the “Friday Tabloid Report with Passing Through”, only on Just Jared. :lol:

Interesting @ 01/20/2007 at 10:51 am

The trophy wife is extinct

By Ellen Connolly

DONALD Trump has one, and John Singleton is probably looking for a new one - but the trophy wife is a dying breed.

Academics have found the first evidence that successful males prefer a partner with a high-powered job to one who stays at home with the children.

“We’ve seen a significant shift,” Sydney University anthropologist Stephen Juan says.

“Society now tends to look down on the trophy wife. It’s now OK to be a power couple.”

Dr Juan says male acceptance of female success began about five years ago, and has gained momentum in the past year.

This has resulted in the emergence of the power couple, here and in Britain and in the US.

Among the high-profile ones are Hollywood’s Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, political power couple Bill and Hillary Clinton and Australia’s own Cate Blanchett and Andrew Upton, Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman, Lachlan and Sarah Murdoch and Baz Luhrmann and Catherine Martin.

The media and arts are represented by Jessica Rowe and Peter Overton, Andrew Denton and Jennifer Byrne, actor Max Gillies and publisher Louise Adler, and literary duo Don and Hilary Watson.

Australia’s political power couples include Anthony Albanese and Carmel Tebbutt, and Malcolm and Lucy Turnbull.

Gerry Harvey and Katie Page are the ultimate power couple in business.

A British study compared men’s incomes with the number of hours women worked.

The higher a man’s salary in the 1980s, the lower the averagenumber of hours worked by his wife.

Two decades on, the situation has reversed.

A professional man’s salary is now 5.5 per cent higher for every 1000 hours a year worked by his wife.

“What has driven the shift is that there are more and more women in the workforce and more and more women who are attaining leadership roles,” Dr Juan says.

“There has been a massive shift in the thinking of men.”

The latest findings are supported by Sydney chief executive Martin Walsh, whose wife, Michelle, is a successful businesswoman.

He says being able to discuss business with, and seek advice from, his wife is an important part of their relationship.

“I think a woman’s drive, energy and perspective are the things that make this world tick,” Mr Walsh, who owns Chadwicks Model Agency, says.

“I think any man who finds successful women a threat is usually pretty incompetent.”

Michelle Walsh, who is juggling motherhood with running a clothing company, believes the notion of a trophy wife “has been relegated to the really, really old men”.

Among the T-shirts she sells is one that reads: “My husband is a bit of fluff.”

Dr Juan says society has lost respect for the “trophy wife”.

“Women are nobody’s trophy. We’ve seen that particularly over the past year.”

Yet there are still males who disagree, he says.

“Donald Trump is a dinosaur in this - but like dinosaurs, they’re destined for extinction.”

Pages: « 150 51 52 [53] 54 55 5665 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.