Wed, 17 January 2007 at 5:46 am
Sin City 2: Angelina Out, Rachel In
A source close to the production of Sin City 2 is claiming that Angelina Jolie is out of the running and Rachel Weisz is in. Director Robert Rodriguez has always wanted Angelina to star in his sequel Sin City 2: A Dame To Kill For but because of scheduling conflicts, it looks like Rachel might be taking on the role of Ava Lord. Rachel Weisz: A Dame To Kill For? Hmmmm…








Older









1,619 Comments
I hope this thread goes to 2000+. JJ should conduct an experiment to see if what you all say is true about the tabs stealing from JJ. If JJ or fans put new info in the thread as opposed to starting a new thread with that info, will the tabs & other blogs have nothing or no new information to write about? Hmmmmmm. People.com seems to get their info here to. I read about the Vietman trip here then it popped up in People.com.
I like Passing Through’s tabloids dissection. Did she break it down or what? I feel that each magazine cited whould get a copy of her “review” every week.
Estelle,
Whoa now lol Obviously, you know where I stand when it comes to that…but uh…it’s an not easy job and I have to tip my hat off to anyone who choose to run for that position. Although Paris would become a nun before I ever get elected. Compared to Hillary people would call me a commie :lol: Even though I’m just a bit more left leaning than her.
peace
1410 Adopting again too soon? Says: January 20th, 2007 at 2:33 pm
I think maybe Brad and Angelina should give the two younger children, especially Shiloh, a chance to fully bond and find their places within the family without mixing up the dynamic. Maybe Angelina’s intentions are good, but this is just too soon.
I know I am getting ready to be crucified, because I disagree with many on this.
^^^^
I don’t assume that people who feel this way do so primarily because they have firsthand experience of being a child among many. That would be presumptious let alone insulting. That said, there are a those that I do know were part of fairly large clans, and who felt daily they were being short changed in every way, suffering especially from the “not enough love to go around” syndrome.
Well I got to thinking about these people as I know them now as adults, and I gotta say that as much as I love them all, it is without a doubt, that each of them would still be people who would have suffered the same feeling of being shortchanged had they been the only child :)
Brad & Angie will do just fine with 3 or 6 all now or later. Bonding has nothing to do with quantity and everything to do with quality, and we know that these kids get alone time with each parent alone, with both parents alone, and as a group. I don’t think there’s anything to worry about.
jpf
1419
freidaflo Says:
January 20th, 2007 at 2:55 pm
Montserrat=-
Thanks for mentioning JLDreyfus’ absence from the list.
I read also sometime ago her relation to the founders of the DREYFUS FUND, a big corporation hdqtered in NY.
She didn’t have Huvane on her side to trumpet her wealth and perhaps when you have much you don’t flaunt it. Well for some reasons, it seem right.
Yes that’s right Julia is a heiress to a global financial fortune. It’s her father who created the Dreyfus Hedgefund I think. Her family, going back generations, is very successful in business. She is also of French descent (Louis pronounced Louwee, the French way) and more importantly has made her own money on top of her family’s fortune. Those Seinfeld reruns have made all involved very wealthy. Julia is a moden day Grace Kelly who came from a similar aristocratic background. When you compare heiress Julia Louis-Dreyfuss to that other heiress, Paris what’s herface…It’s a different world. Everyone should take listings like that with a grain of salt. I’m sure there are a lot of inflated numbers on there.
Thanks for posting, Amandine.
((((((((paging all lurkers, your post are a welcome fresh air, do post more, thank you)))))))))))
Amaya- trust me lady, you can untight those tightassknowitall in the white house right now with one hand…..hahahahha ;)
Frenchy- thanks for those beautiful pictures of Angie. Imagine, she started the white solft elegant trend in 2004 and just now this year people start to wearing them?..hahahaha ( the GG new trend, white is in….what a joke). She looked stunning and regal… did you know that was the last time both of them at the Oscar?….BP was there as well…wondering what he was thinking when he saw her up there….penny for your though Brad? :)
I don’t think Brad was at the oscars in 2004.
The tabloid press can’t stand Angelina because she is making being a nasty snark to A list actors seem unfashionable. Here she is being nice, cordial, honest & cooperative with the press and looking generally fanstastic, happy, in love and centered, outside interests outside of Hollywood and just plain ol beautiful. She’s doing nothing wrong to anyone, has nothing bad to say about any fellow actor and she’s not the train wreck of the Z list celebrities. But here she is a big star with a big star boyfriend and the hens want something to cluck about. Since there’s no train wreck to report on, they take any normal activity in a person’s life like adopting, parenting, vacationing, working, home buying/selling, shopping, having a cold, etc..and twist it to make a negative story where there is none. They are so used to reporting on the train wrecks that when the radar focuses on someone like Angelina or Zen non-talking Brad, the’re out of their element. They don’t know what to do.
Good day everyone, I have a birthday party to go to.
be good. ;)
1434
Quack Quack Says:
woot …
AMEN!!
1323
Hello Says:
January 20th, 2007 at 10:37 am
Jolie voted most attractive woman
When it comes to her looks, Angelina Jolie can rest assured that there’s no other woman on the planet who can compete with her, for she recently topped a poll for the ‘Most Attractive Woman’.
The online poll, conducted by Hello magazine, saw 25 percent of readers and Jolie fans voting to make sure that the brunette mum-of-three topped the poll.
Coming in on the actress’ heels was TV series House MD star Jennier Morrison who laid claim to the second spot, reports Hello magazine.
She was followed by the woman Brad Pitt dumped in favour of Jolie – Jennifer Aniston, who was named the third ‘Most Attractive Woman’.
The top five was rounded of by the princess of pop Christina Aguilera, and reality TV star Nicole Richie, who came in fourth and fifth place respectively.
The list for top ten ‘Most Attractive Woman’, as per hellomagazine.com is:
1. Angelina Jolie
2. Jennier Morrison
3. Jennifer Aniston
4. Christina Aguilera
5. Nicole Richie
6. Queen Rania
7. Emma Bunton
8. Nicole Kidman
9. Cate Blanchett
10. Salma Hayek
Oh my god!!! Ladies this list is totally rediculous. If you want to sing the praises of a couple of these ladies you should also look at the other winners…Nicole Ritchie???, Christina ????. Obviously this IS a bogus and biased poll as none of these women except a few should even be in the running. Wake-up!! But you people will take any win for your queen. BTW if Angelina wasnt on the list you would be saying the EXACT SAME THING!! Its easy to appear to soar like an eagle if your floating around with the turkeys! And NO I dont think Aniston should even be on a list like this - and where did they conduct this poll?? Who did they ask??
1433
babyface Says:
January 20th, 2007 at 3:59 pm
I don’t think Brad was at the oscars in 2004.
======================================
He wasn’t.
Brad was only at the OSCARS in 1992, 1996 and 2000.
1423-Frenchy
People who make a big thing about Angie ’s jumping into the pool are full of bs.
NOne of these people couldn’t probably win even a sack race, bah.
Anyone who follows golf tournaments, some of past winners really jumped into water/lake ( one time with a gator seen not too far-florida ) for a bet or for sheer fun. A. Sorrenstam , LPGA’s top player did it but in a shallow water.
The joy of winning something is pure excitement.
1437 And you buy this?
We voted for the one who is truly attractive.!! That’s all…
And who voted for the fuglies?????
The tabloids and most of the media they don’t know what they want when it comes to celebrities. They want them to be open and invite the cameras into their lives. Angelina has never closed the door on them yet look at how they treat her. They twist her words around to make her seem like a b*tch, they insult her or both.
From my POV I would think they’d love her because she’s not a closed book but she also not Paris Hilton letting everyone in on her business..literally. But if she did a 180 and became reclusive, then she would still have trash written about her saying that she’s a snob that can’t handle fame. No matter what they say or write about her, they can’t deny that she is one of the most sought after and admired actresses of our time.
Look at people who are at the GG and the Oscars…who don’t we see there? The “Hollywood It Girls” like Paris, Nicole, Mischa etc..because they don’t belong there. Sure they’re invited to the after parties because that’s the only thing they’re good at. And unlike Angelina, none of them are talented, thoughtful, intelligent and they didn’t earn their fame and fortune, it was handed to them. Nor are they respected like she is by people who actually matter like politicians, directors, producers, former presidents, the list goes on. Yet the tabloids keep on featuring her and these twits on their covers and pages trying to put them on the same level when all know (especially those in the industry) that they’re not. The tabloids and most of the media are going to continue this BS for $$$ and to feed the haters but in the end of day, Angie is going to continue to flourish personally and professionally.
I am glad that People officially set the record straight on why Angelina was in Vietnam. Sure it may be a cover for other stuff. IF so Its unfortunate she needs one due to lack of privacy. I really hope that when they adopt again that there are no rumors beforehand. Let the announcement by them be the first real info other than the general speculation that they will adopt again at some point.
I salute “Passing Through” for the tabloid round-up.
**I hope you’ll do it every week so for some of us will not bother to buy those tabloids, except of course People Magazine. I hate giving those lying tabloids business & hand over my hard-earned money to them.****
BAMZS 4 life
Way to go Cliniqua. I always admire your comments. I read that you got some stalkers on this thread. Those pesky trolls/haters seemed good at one thing…responding & agreeing with their own posts. How sick can you be haters? LOL
Amaya, my thoughts exactly. I cringe when I go through the blogs and I see Angie listed in a demeaning form along with Hollywood starlets that party all night and seek attention. This is very unfortunate. A lot of us have decided to stay with JJ where meaningful and intelligent coversations are brought up about Brad and Angie.
Anytime Brad and Angie are supposed to show up somewhere you see all these reporters disappointed when they don’t see Angie. Why? They want to use her as their meal ticket for ratings and find fault in what she does. I wonder how many of these reporters will feel nice if they had their faces pasted on the front pages of tabloids for two years with negative news. How many of them will be able to face the media and smile? I remember when Ryan Seacrest was photographed kissing Teri Hatcher. Their pictures were all over the news and tabloids, he claimed that he dropped Teri because he couldn’t stand the publicity. Fast forward two years Ryan is saying someone should not support their man if they don’t want to be interviewed???
In an emotional interview on Thursday’s ”Access Hollywood,” Jon Voight went public about his estrangement from daughter Angelina Jolie, pleading with her fans and handlers to see that she gets help for unspecified ”mental problems”.
Voight says his daughter, who won an Oscar for playing a mental patient in ”Girl, Interrupted,” began showing signs of mental illness as an infant. (He divorced Jolie’s mother before their daughter was a year old but says he remained a presence in her life.) He said he was ”brokenhearted…because I’ve been trying to reach my daughter and get her help, and I have failed and I’m sorry. Really I haven’t come forward and addressed the serious mental problems she has spoken about so candidly to the press over the years, but I’ve tried behind the scenes in every way.”
He said he had confronted his daughter a number of times. During the making of ”Girl,” he said she told him, ”You can’t help me! You can’t help my pain!” They had a brief reconciliation when they worked together on ”Lara Croft: Tomb Raider,” but it didn’t last. He said he tried to greet her recently at a Hollywood party, but her manager blocked him and said, ”She doesn’t want to see you.”
1306
African Girl Says:
January 20th, 2007 at 7:56 am
Passing Through - I lying in bed laughing my behind off and hoping I don’t wake the house. I swear….as soon as Jared gets the new site going, we must campaign for your own special thread “PT’s Tabloid Recap”. Honestly, you’ll have more hits than….than…whatever ever it is that has more hits right now. Apart from saving people a lot of money (hey, 1.99 is a lot of money somewhere), you also manage to strip the tabloids down to it’s core. I doubt anyone who reads your breakdown is gonna take tabloids seriously again. I tell ya, you will be doing a public servie. Thanks for the laughs and I agree with you Star is the Master.
++++++++++++
Ntt, AG, et. al. - Thanks for the vote of confidence in my abilities to recap the tabs, but I couldn’t do this on a weekly basis. Doing so would eventually rob me of my ability to deductively reason. I’m pretty sure that long-term weekly exposure to the Life & Style magazine would lead to blindness and baldness. I’d be blind from the tears of my laughter and bald because their stupidy made me pull all the hair out of my head!
Haha, PT, you made me laugh again. No, we don’t want you to be blind and bald lol, don’t sacrafice yourself for us. But occasionally it’s such an amusement to read your tab recaps.
Has angie gotten help yet #1447 — I really think that she is a ticking bomb. All the wonderful things she is doing now are not going to eliminate the pain she has buried. Jon Voight may not have been a perfect father but he is a father no less and is seriously interested in the welfare of his child. She turned her back on him because he knows her. He tried to get her help. One day she will explode - the constant moving from one place to another is a girl on the run.
Pages: « 1 … 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 … 65 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!