Top 20 Richest Women in Entertainment

celia,
Maniston will never have a child…….She is fruitless and will remain that way till she falls off this earth.

I find you all really funny this list is so not true how did janet jackson get there she just brought out an album and it did not do well, what do i know? all i know is all our arguments are baseless , and if it is true then good on them i say and if jen got any money from the divorce WHICH I KNOW SHE DIDN’T because remember it depends on how much your husband was worth when you got married and how much he made while you were still married(they never made any agreement and jen did not ask for anthing only her name she wanted back and trust me i rememeber that clearly and if she asked they would still be in the process today like alot of rich divorce settlements) and they were married for only four years she is entitled to virtually nothing i am studying law and i know what i am talking about ALL IN ALL CHARITY HAS TO COME FROM THE HEART AND WE DO NOT OWN THE MONEY AT LEAST THEY PAY THEIR TAXES and that in some way helps many people.

74
Simon Says:

January 18th, 2007 at 11:50 am
Maniston has been lying and manipulating the media and YOU for
almosst two years. She needs to pay for it! She’s been GRASPING
for “sympathy” and attention - there are NO “secret” charities for
her…And, in the process, she’s done so much damage to Angelina
Jolie! What a rotten person! Maniston is GREEDY&STINGY, and all
the worst anyone can think of. WHY do some of the US REDNECKS
still like her?? Give me one real reason!
What did Brad&Angie really do?! Fell in love?! God! Everyone knows
by now that his CHILDLESS& FRUITLESS “EXPERIMENTAL MERGER”
was kaput anyways. I am glad that they just live their lives with
their children, loving each other and doing good.
———————————————————————————–

Great well said. But why are you saying it here. This post have nothing to do with either Angelina nor for that matter Jennifer. Please STOP This is exactly the triangle everyone is trying to get out of!!!

from imdb.com

Angelina Jolie

Salary
The Good Shepherd (2006) $10,000,000
Mr. & Mrs. Smith (2005) $10,000,000
Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life (2003) $12,000,000
Lara Croft: Tomb Raider (2001) $7,000,000

Jennifer Aniston

Salary
Along Came Polly (2004) $5,000,000
Rock Star (2001) $3,000,000
Picture Perfect (1997) $2,000,000

Angelina may not be on the list but she does more with less. Why can’t Mary-Kate Olsen give 1/3 of her earnings?

Also, it is o

That Sandra Bullock, Jennifer Aniston, and Gisele Bundchen can be some of the highest earning women shows how silly this list is.

Great actors like Helen Mirren, Judi Dench and Cate Blanchett should be earning more that a girl who played Rachel Green for like 7 years. Ridiculous!

Sandra Bullock has not had a hit since God knows when.

Don’t get me started on Angelina Jolie not being on the list then again Angelina is not in the business of making herself into a brand to make money like J-Lo

This is such a good analysis by Cliniqua

you want to know where MANISTON GOT the BULK of money THAT PUT HER IN THE TOP, and why Courtney COX and KUDROW aren’t on this list WITH HER

….it’s because when she was WITH BRAD PITT, he was generous enough of a husband to include her in PLAN B, HIS PRODUCTION COMPANY…they produced, among other things - CHARLIE & THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY ….

Plan B, was NOT Maniston’s idea, nor her baby at any point in time - she was a partner IN NAME ONLY - BRAD pulled her in, because he was with her at the time, and initially it was thought that her lame TV SIT-COM HACK A S S could MAYBE get the FILM ROLES that she OTHERWISE COULD NOT HAVE GOTTEN ON HER OWN,

without BRAD PITT she’s just a blonder version of PATRICIA HEATON on Everybody Loves Raymond.)

So once again, and in all things she can thank BRAD PITT for why we have to be assaulted with her fug face and her big ol’ moneybags in the way of her bought covers courtesy of Huvane. It’s poetic she is wedged in there with the OLSEN TWINS and Judge Judy. Proof that money cannot buy you status in your field. HAHAHAHA!

ALL THAT MONEY Jen has and her MOM GOES To the INDIGENT CARE WARD in L.A.?!! What an evil b*tch! WHY DOESN’T *THAT* make the TABLOIDS in a BIG WAY…if Angelina did that, she’d be drummed out of America!

…..and PUH-LEEZE ,b>don’t tell me about this one, or that one donating and ‘keeping it quiet,’

first of all - as a celebrity, you have an OBLIGATION to make people AWARE, so that on top of your charitable giving, you MIGHT inspire others to either do the same, or at the very LEAST be aware of a situation (be it disease, famine, the impoverished or disadvantaged!) -

no CELEBRITY ’silently and quietly’ donates to issue of import. If they do it ‘quietly’ it’s only because they are CHEAP and they KNOW they could be doing MORE!

Besides, Maniston was asked POINT BLANK to HER FACE if she donated, and she responded, ‘I only concentrate on my tabloid career,’ half-serious IMO, and later said, ‘Charity is not ‘my thing.’ She’s just….AWFUL. UGH.

I think you guys are fighting over something we, as women, should be proud of. Look how far we have come. Could you have imagined 15 or 20 years ago, that females in the entertainment industry could be so powerful and wealthy!?! It’s amazing!

A lot of people are saying these people should be donating their money, my question is how do you know they don’t? I’ve seen adds where JA is the taking to a leukemia patient, and encouraging supportting their research hospital.

I also think we should stop all this cattiness between JA and AJ. They are both beautiful, and strong women. Let them be.

Sian! Cliniqua is so far up her own **** that she can’t help talking a load of ****.

Good for you Jen…. on paper as well, worth SO MUCH MORE than Jolie, in EVERY WAY.

boomstick -

We comment NOT because jolie is not on the list. We are merely analyzing how Jen got her wealth. We are commenting on why with all that money,

1) why she did NOT donate or donate “CHEAP”?
2) why her mother is in indignant care in LA?
3) why she continue to milk the divorce for public sympathy.

We comment not because of jolie not on the list.

Number One Before I Leave You Jerks - the bullk of the divorce money with Pitt was earned by her. She still gets a whopper of an income from friends.

You people on this blog are infamous losers. I was just reading about the Angie freaks on Just Jared a few minutes ago on two legitimate blogs.

Bye, losers.

I absolutely agree with the Cliniqua past.

The power of a donated sum of money is not just the money itself but the act of giving is inspiring to others. Especially if it is a celebrity donating - the effect of the donation will go far beyond the actual amount of money.

In today’s celebrity and idol obsessed world, whether we like it or not, people tend to look up to celebrities and use them as role models. People do what the celebrities do, wear what the celebrities wear and so on!

How many people had heard of the South Africa problems and Namibia if not for Oprah and Angelina and Brad.

And how many people would have donated to Oprah’s Angel network that helps people with AIDS, had Oprah made a secret private donation to a South African charity!

So you see - I have no problem with a celebrity getting publicity for an act like that if it means MORE exposure for the charities as well.

The only people that complain about celebrities getting publicity are those who dislike people more successfull than themselves!

95
Margaret Says:

January 18th, 2007 at 12:47 pm
Number One Before I Leave You Jerks - the bullk of the divorce money with Pitt was earned by her. She still gets a whopper of an income from friends.

You people on this blog are infamous losers. I was just reading about the Angie freaks on Just Jared a few minutes ago on two legitimate blogs.

Bye, losers.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Bye winner!