Oscar Roundtable: Brad, Leo, Helen & Co.
Newsweek sat down with Brad Pitt, Cate Blanchett, Forest Whitaker, Helen Mirren, Penelope Cruz, and Leonardo DiCaprio for their Oscar Roundtable at the Egyptian Theater in Hollywood. Watch the videos here; check out the transcript after the jump! Two excerpts below…
How strippers changed Brad Pitt’s life: “Yeah, my job was to drive them to bachelor parties and things. I’d pick them up, and at the gig I’d collect the money, play the bad Prince tapes and catch the girls’ clothes. It was not a wholesome atmosphere, and it got very depressing. After two months I went in to quit, and the guy said, “Listen, I’ve got this one last gig tonight.” So I did it, and this girl—I’d never met her before—was in an acting class taught by a man named Roy London [a famous acting coach]. I went and checked it out, and it really set me on the path to where I am now.”
When Penelope Cruz knew she was famous: “One day I came out on the street for a walk with my dad, and somebody screamed from a car, “I love you!” And a minute later, somebody else screamed, “Whore!” [Laughter] Then I knew I was famous.”
What did your parents think when you told them you wanted to be an actor?
HELEN MIRREN: My parents were very against the idea, so I trained as a teacher for three years. I was a horrible, really bad teacher. I didn’t become a professional actress until I was about 22.
FOREST WHITAKER: My parents really wanted me to go to West Point—something practical like that. Ten years into my acting career they were still trying to get me to go back to school. I wasn’t making much money, and sometimes really struggling, but I was, like, “No, Ma. This is what I want to do.” Those were difficult conversations because I had my own doubts. It took me a long time to feel comfortable thinking, “I’m an actor. I can do this.”
Cate, is it true that your first acting job was as an extra in an Arabic boxing movie?
CATE BLANCHETT: I was at university studying fine arts, and I took a year off and went traveling. I had 2,500 Australian dollars, which is nothing, and I traveled for a year on that, so I ended up in places like a bunker in Istanbul with water dripping from the ceiling. Later, I was staying in this place in Cairo. I literally had no money, and some Scottish guy who was printing money and passports in the foyer said, “Do you want to earn five Egyptian dollars?” It wasn’t to sleep with anyone. It was to be an extra in this boxing movie, so I said, “Sure.” They had free falafel.
MIRREN: We’re all in it for the free food, actually. We are all, in our hearts, out-of-work actors.
It seems every actor, no matter how successful, thinks he’ll never work again. Do you feel that way, Brad?
BRAD PITT: Not really, no. [Laughter]
You all had some surprising early jobs before you became actors. Forest was a classical tenor. Helen was a sort of carnival barker.
PITT: I had a job driving strippers around.
LEONARDO DICAPRIO: Really?
BLANCHETT: Just last month.
PITT: I love her. Yeah, my job was to drive them to bachelor parties and things. I’d pick them up, and at the gig I’d collect the money, play the bad Prince tapes and catch the girls’ clothes. It was not a wholesome atmosphere, and it got very depressing. After two months I went in to quit, and the guy said, “Listen, I’ve got this one last gig tonight.” So I did it, and this girl—I’d never met her before—was in an acting class taught by a man named Roy London [a famous acting coach]. I went and checked it out, and it really set me on the path to where I am now.
A stripper changed the course of your career.
PITT: [Nods] Strippers changed my life.
We’ll see that in the National Enquirer next week.
PITT: [Looks toward the ceiling] I just want one week off. Just one.
Leo, you made your first film, “This Boy’s Life,” at 16. What was that like?
DICAPRIO: I didn’t know how to conduct myself on a film set. The director, Michael Caton-Jones, really took me under his wing. He said things like, “When you’re rehearsing with Robert De Niro, you don’t talk about what baseball cards you’re collecting.”
MIRREN: I was like a rabbit in headlights for years on film sets, not understanding who was doing what, and how you’re supposed to behave. It is a terrifying environment, really.
Penelope, in “Jamón, Jamón” you played the daughter of a prostitute, and you became a sensation, and a sex symbol, at 17. What was that like?
PENELOPE CRUZ: One day I came out on the street for a walk with my dad, and somebody screamed from a car, “I love you!” And a minute later, somebody else screamed, “Whore!” [Laughter] Then I knew I was famous. It was unbelievable. I was 16 when I made the movie. I didn’t tell my parents, and I was hiding the script from them. Then they took my grandmother to the premiere, and I always felt bad about that. But the movie was good, and it did a lot of good things for my career. Every role I accepted after that I was covered up to here. [Raises her hand to her neck]
Leo, you became a teen idol at an early age also.
DICAPRIO: I had a brief run at that on television, being thrown on the cover of teen magazines, and I was trying to work away from that. I wanted to establish myself as an actor who put a lot of thought into his characters and did good work. And then I did a movie called “Titanic,” and there I was, right back into that position of being looked at as another piece of cute meat.
PITT: That you are. [Laughter]
DICAPRIO: It was pretty disheartening to be objectified like that. I wanted to stop acting for a little bit. It changed my life in a lot of ways, but at the same time, I can’t say that it didn’t give me opportunities. It made me, for the first time, in control of my career. But yeah, it was weird.
Brad, Hollywood wanted you to be a conventional leading man. You didn’t.
PITT: Acting is about discovery, for me, and these “leading man” scripts—Leo can testify to this—they’re all the same guy. You can plug any one of us into it and you get a variation on a theme, but anyone can do it. Where is the discovery in that?
BLANCHETT: So did you guys look to a relationship with a director to help champion the way out?
DICAPRIO: I definitely sought out the relationship with Martin Scorsese. It was important to me to find somebody I could trust. It’s a weird thing to put your performance in another person’s hands. We so often sit in rooms with directors and you hear their vision about a specific project, but there’s a huge difference between what they say and what actually shows up on screen.
PITT: Do directors want you to [play a version] of them?
DICAPRIO: Sometimes you get that feeling, yeah.
MIRREN: It doesn’t happen to women. You get to play their fantasy instead. But you know, [the industry] is always trying to put you in a box, and you’re always having to fight your way out of it. They don’t want you to grow up or grow older or change, so it’s great when a role comes up that allows you to take that next step. It happened with me on “Prime Suspect.” Suddenly I was allowed to look like a woman of the age that I was. I didn’t have to have glamorous lighting. I didn’t have to wear makeup. It was fabulously liberating, and it’s really why I’m still working, because I was allowed to step forward.
Forest, you’ve played roles that weren’t actually written for black actors.
WHITAKER: I had moments where the directors were open enough to let me do that, yeah. In “Good Morning, Vietnam,” my character was written as a nerdy Jewish guy. In “The Color of Money,” the character was originally a Yuppie.
DICAPRIO: Was it really? That character was stellar. I remember seeing you in “The Color of Money” at a very young age, going, “Who is this guy?”
WHITAKER: I was a replacement. They fired somebody, and I flew in and auditioned. That’s how it happened.
MIRREN: My husband [Taylor Hackford] directed … what was it called? Oh, God, I forgot the name of it. Famous movie with Debra Winger?
“An Officer and a Gentleman.”
MIRREN: Thank you. The Lou Gossett Jr. role was written for a white man, and Taylor forced the studio to cast Lou. Lou won an Oscar for it, in fact.
Which movie made you want to become an actor?
CRUZ: Pedro Almodóvar’s “Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down!” I was 13 when I saw that movie. I came out of the theater completely fascinated. I started to become obsessed with Pedro, and I decided then to become an actress.
BLANCHETT: The only role I wanted to play was Lucy in “You’re a Good Man, Charlie Brown.” I also wanted to be Gregory Peck.
PITT: I remember sneaking into “Saturday Night Fever,” and it had a profound effect on me. [Laughter]
MIRREN: The first movie that caught my imagination was “L’Avventura,” by Antonioni. Until then I had seen only Rock Hudson/Doris Day movies, and I wasn’t into them very much.
WHITAKER: When I was a kid there weren’t a lot of black actors working in films, so acting didn’t seem like a possibility. The first actor I remember being struck by was Sidney Poitier.
DICAPRIO: I tried to get an agent when I was around 7. I was a break-dancer and had a mohawk, and I was rejected. I knew I wanted to be an actor, but it wasn’t until “This Boy’s Life,” when I was 16, that I started to research quality films. I remember watching James Dean in “East of Eden.” I said to myself, “Wow, I didn’t know it was possible to give a performance this good.”
PITT: Although you were extraordinaryon “Growing Pains.”
DICAPRIO: Thank you, buddy. As were you.
Leo, didn’t you get thrown off the set of “Romper Room”?
DICAPRIO: Yeah, when I was 3 years old. I ran up to the camera and started shaking it, saying, “Look at me!”
Dustin Hoffman famously asked Laurence Olivier once what acting was all about, and Olivier replied, “Look at me, look at me, look at me.”
MIRREN: I hate being looked at.
BLANCHETT: I think it’s probably “Look into me.” What we perceive to be naturalism or realism has been utterly eroded by so-called reality television, where people are performing themselves. But what we do, actually, is unmask and reveal what it means to be human, and allow someone in. It’s taken me a long time to allow myself to be exposed in front of a camera.
PITT: Acting is really a team sport. A lot of times one actor will become the MVP, but just like in tennis, your game is elevated if you’re playing with someone better. I mean, just look at the way Cate compensated for George Clooney in “The Good German.” [Laughter]
Are there roles that you look at and think, “I wish I could have played that”?
DICAPRIO: Tons. Burt Lancaster in “Sweet Smell of Success.” De Niro in “Taxi Driver.”
CRUZ: Either of the two women in “Terms of Endearment.” Carmen Maura in “Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown.” Shirley MacLaine in “The Apartment.”
BLANCHETT: Anything Elizabeth Taylor has ever done.
MIRREN: It’s not that you want to play the role; you’re inspired by it. It’s not as if you’re sitting there going, “Oh, I would have been better.” [Pause] Well, sometimes you are. [Laughter]
BLANCHETT: There’s a moment in “A Streetcar Named Desire,” where Vivien Leigh has just gone into the bathroom, and Marlon Brando’s banging on the door, and she opens the door and his hand flinches. It’s the most astonishing shot. This guy that Brando could have played with complete brutality, and [instead he shows] his vulnerability, in that hand.
DICAPRIO: I wanted to ask everyone something: we all talk about being “in the zone”—becoming our character—but there are so many technical things that happen when you’re making a movie, it’s impossible not to realize that there’s a camera there, and your character has to emote this specific emotion. Those moments where it all disappears, and you’re really speaking as this other person? I’m lucky if that happens more than once on a movie.
PITT: I find alcohol helps. [Laughter]
When you’re watching a movie, are you always aware of the actors’ technique, or can you get lost in it the way we do?
MIRREN: Completely lost.
BLANCHETT: Well, I didn’t get lost in “Battlefield Earth.”
Was there a role you’d wished you’d played that you didn’t?
BLANCHETT: I’ve been lucky in a way. In school I was tall and my sexuality was dubious. I was always playing men. And then my nationality has been dubious, having played Elizabeth I quite early in my film career. So I feel like I got some weird and wonderful choices.
PITT: [To DiCaprio] Our sexuality has been dubious as well. [Laughter]
Would you care to discuss that?
PITT: No, there’s been enough discussion.
BLANCHETT: We have photographs.
Was there a role that caused you more anxiety than others?
BLANCHETT: They all scare me. But I tell myself that anxiety is just misplaced excitement. You’re constantly risking failure, so I never watch the films I’m in. That way, I always feel like, “OK, that worked.” I had an experience on “Babel” which I’ve never had shooting a film. I thought, “God, that was a really great take.” And then I saw the film, and the whole scene was played on Brad. [Laughter]
Helen, do you know what Queen Elizabeth thinks of your portrayal of her?
MIRREN: Of course I don’t.
Has she seen it?
MIRREN: I’m sure. Who could resist? Someone who is very close to the queen, a great historian named Robert Lacey, said he thinks she would have said, as the credits rolled, “That wasn’t too bad, was it? I think I’ll have a gin and tonic.”
PITT: How did you start shaping her? She’s got this great fireplug walk, and your glasses were always halfway down the bridge of your nose.
MIRREN: Obviously there’s a lot of film on her, but it’s of her in her formal role—hardly anything behind closed doors. Playing a real character, you have to behave likea detective and see things that maybe no one else has. She’s unbelievably composed, but on the films I noticed that her thumb is always turning her wedding ring round and round and round. There’s this inner beat, this tension.
When you’re creating a character, do you need to find something external like that? Penelope, in “Volver”—
CRUZ: I know what you’re going to ask.
You wore a padded butt for your role.
MIRREN: I had a padded butt in “The Queen,” as well. It wasn’t just Penelope.
CRUZ: Oh, I’m so happy! Now every time someone asks me this, I’m going to say, “Helen had one, too.”
Did the butt help?
CRUZ: Completely. Pedro and I didn’t talk about it. Maybe a one-minute conversation. It just made me work in a different way, move in a different way. It was like finding the right shoes for the character.
You’ve all done some impressive accent work in your careers. Cate has done three different ones this year. Is it a hurdle to get over when you’re building a character?
WHITAKER: Accents help me figure out how to move, how to gesture. I think sometimes when an actor’s accent doesn’t work, it’s because it isn’t connected to the body.
MIRREN: Until you nail the accent it is paralyzing. You can’t act—you can’t do anything—because all you can hear is your voice making the wrong sound. What’s even more difficult is what Penelope has done. I think to act in a foreign language is the most unbelievably difficult thing. I can’t imagine it.
Penelope, your first English-language film was “The Hi-Lo Country.” Was that scary?
CRUZ: Oh, so scary. I didn’t understand a word [director] Stephen Frears was saying. He’s very sweet, but he has a very strong accent, and I only knew my dialogue for the character. I was always going to the bathroom to cry and coming back and trying to hide it.
Brad, your Irish Gypsy accent in Guy Ritchie’s “Snatch” is so great that we can’t understand a word you’re saying.
PITT: That was last-minute, night-before, full-panic mode. I kept trying to get the dialect—I probably started a little late—and it was just too stiff. I went to Guy the day before and said, “You’ve got to do this part. I can’t do it.” And he’s, like, “Yeah. Right.” But it occurred to me that the genius of what Benicio Del Toro had done in “The Usual Suspects” was that you couldn’t understand what he was saying a lot of times. So about midnight, I started walking around the North End of London, working on it and working on it, and it just kept getting more and more indecipherable. Thank God it worked.
BLANCHETT: I never think of accents as something that’s slapped on. It’s syntax and rhythm and breath. It’s about when people choose to pause, what words they emphasize. You can say it’s accent, but it’s actually thought process. It’s got to be organic. And I think the earlier you can start the better.
Brad. [He mimics being stabbed in the heart.]
MIRREN: You’re absolutely right. It’s not something that you glom on the top, as if language and accent are separate. Americans are always saying, “Oh, I love your accent.” I don’t have the bloody accent. You’ve got the accent. [Laughter] No, I never say that. I say, “Thank you so much. How sweet of you.”
Do you feel differently about your work than you did when you started acting?
PITT: When I started I had this idea that the films I did defined me, and that my life would be interesting based on the characters I’d chosen. I don’t feel that way anymore. I’m a father now. There are other things that are important to me. I was chasing something that wasn’t fulfilling. I caught myself on the phone the other day—Leo has been playing some real strong men these last few years—and I found myself saying, “I want to play more of a man.” I got off the phone and I thought, “No. Live like a man, and the movies will follow.”
WHITAKER: I had to learn to not divorce my life from my work. My work is a continual process of growth for me; it’s an expansion of myself. In the last couple of years, I’ve been taking things I learn about myself in my work and using it to be more completely there for my kids, my family, my friends. It’s flowing in a complete way. It has been a bit of an awakening.
DICAPRIO: Man, I’ve got to get some kids, huh? I only really started enjoying acting when there was a certain level of detachment from the end result. I remember being 15 and going on 160 auditions, and not getting a single role for a year and a half. I realized I was turning into one of those Hollywood kids: “Hi, I’m Leo! And I’m going to be reading today! Oh yeah, I had a great day at school! I love school!” [Laughter] I had become a product of this system where everyone is aiming to please the director, the casting director, whomever. So I started to think about the character—the work—instead of the result. You know, kids are always asking me what they should do to become actors. You give them the pat answers: “Study your lines. Work hard. Don’t give up.” But what I want to tell them is, “You have to not care what these people think about you.”
MIRREN: You were lucky to learn that at 15. Marlon Brando’s great acting advice was, “Don’t care too much.” I never understood that, because I cared so much, and still do. But what he meant was, let go of that total investment in “Are they going to love me?” “Am I going to be good?” F—- that. Maybe that’s what Brad is saying as well.
PITT: Yeah, but it took me 800 words to say what he did in four.
You’re all rich. You’re all famous. You’ve all received critical acclaim. Why work? Why keep acting?
DICAPRIO: I love it. There’s no other art form in the world that affects me more. There’s nothing that I walk away from feeling transformed by the way I do with cinema. There’s something so gratifying about being burned into celluloid and knowing that I can look back later in life and have stories about those experiences. It’s an amazing gift.
WHITAKER: It’s magic. Who wouldn’t want to be a part of that?
CRUZ: It gives me so much happiness to know that I will never know everything about acting. That fear of not knowing will always be with me, no matter what happens.
PITT: It’s the love for the story, and a respect for the business. I want to be better in it, and better for it. I’m still striving for that. And I believe in the power of films.
BLANCHETT: Krzysztof Kieslowski said that filmmaking is a conversation with an audience. When you’re connecting with other people, it’s utterly thrilling. I feel alive when I’m acting. It’s tragic, but true. I would die in a rehearsal room if I could.
Helen, what keeps you acting?
MIRREN: Money. [Laughter] And it’s incredibly good fun. Of course, there are some intense artistic reasons, but I’m not going to go into them. So, yeah, fun and money.








Older









1,036 Comments
U.S. film actress Angelina Jolie spent last week in Vietnam for a meeting on behalf of the Maddox Jolie-Pitt Project, People magazine says.
The project’s executive director Stephan Bognar said that he and Jolie were in Vietnam meeting with officials from the International Finance Corp.’s Mekong Private Sector Development Facility, a privately funded World Bank initiative that promotes economic development in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, People reported.
The actress attended the meeting as a representative of the project, her charity aiding Cambodia.
Jolie is reportedly interested in a program to get farmers to grow and sell bamboo, increasing their monthly income from $25 to $100-300.
Brad Pitt and Jolie, along with their children Maddox, Zahara and Shiloh were back in New Orleans, where the couple just bought a $3.5 million house, People said.
I have just read the NYT article - I have hot been exposed to the NYT before as I am from Australia.
My first question upon reading it is: ‘Who owns NYT?’ It has a Rupert Murdoch feel to it - you know, why let truth get in the way of a good story!
My second qu is re C James: ‘How old is she for crying out loud?’
The over-riding image I had of her as I was reading it was of a teenage wannabe groupie at Salem High, joining the ‘witch’ hunt to try & curry favour with the lead teen slasher! Straight out of the Crucible! Sitting at her computer terminal, blood dripping from her fangs as she vomits bile!
Where’s the balanced journalism? Apart from all the dubious sources, she uses very obvious & heavy-handed techniques - the over-emotive words, repetition etc etc. She comes across as nothing more than a hack!
One of my daughters is studying Media & Communication at Sydney Uni - interesting that only last week she was sharing that one of the things they studied last year was how the media deliberately creates these almost mythical ‘demons’ in the public’s mind by deliberately feeding the whole thing until it develops a life of its own E.g. the ‘witch hunt’ in Australia against Lindy Chamberlain - often they are quite aware there is little truth or substance to an issue/story. but they can see potential for it to steam-roll on forever so they keep shovelling on the coal!
This has that sort of feel to it!
188
Observer2 Says:
_____________________________
I agree with you 100%
A 40 year old smart and intelligent man is not gonna go run after anyone knowing his career and his reputation is at stake. BRAD HAS MADE A VERY VERY SMART MOVE IN HIS LIFE(i.e. leave the dumb TV sitcom actress) AND I ADMIRE HIM SO VERY VERY MUCH FOR IT(anyone with half a brain will say AMEN to that).
HE HAS EMERGED VICTORIOUS!! HE IS A HAPPY MAN, HIS PRODUCTION COMPANY PLAN B IS MAKING TONS OF MONEY, HIS CAREER IS AT ITS PEAK, 2007 IS GONNA BE INTERESTING FOR BRANGELINA AND THEIR FANS. AND THAT’S WHY I AM HAPPY TO BE A FAN.
I hope Brad nominated for Best Actor for his work in CCBB and Jesse James, and I hope Angie will get nominated for Best Actress for her work in AMH. Can you imagine both of them at Oscars in 2008. I am waiting. I hoping and praying it will happen.
Not many people like Angelina Jolie. I think it’s been evident for a long time…but you refuse to accept it… she’s a fake.
I like this Newsweek issue. I am going to buy it. Thank God, Ryan Seacrest does not work for Newsweek.
there is so much hate for Angie, I can’t understand why everyone hates her. It didn’t used to bother me but now it does.. it seems only the very few on this board stand up for her these days.
477
Not many people like Angelina Jolie. I think it’s been evident for a long time…but you refuse to accept it… she’s a fake.
++++++++++++
A fake? How can a genuine humanitarian, traveling around the globe to help the less fortunate be fake?
How can a lovely woman who donates 1/3 of her salary be fake?
How can a generous woman who does not belong to the top 20 richest women in entertainment, yet donate half of her charity be fake?
How can a warm and caring woman who builds and provides a loving home for poor orphans be fake?
More and more people are loving Angelina Jolie because more and more people are discovering her good deeds.
477
I think it’s time everyone accepted Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 5:19 am
—
Nobody cares about your lame opinion.
correction ….
How can a generous woman who does not belong to the top 20 richest women in entertainment, yet donates a third of her salary to charity be fake?
Good Morning all BAMZS fans! Blessings and well wishes to Brad, Angelina, and the beautiful children!! Have a great Monday all.
angie is the real thing
=================================
she doesn’t do too many movies these days and when she does it’s only bit parts so probably not much donated to charity.. and now she’s with Brad she can probably afford to donate her whole salary…
a lot of people can see through her
Can fans please stop responding to the x fans.
I’m from Japan and I report about AJ’s popularity here in Japan. She has been always No.1 or 2 on several movie magazine’s monthly poles for years. She has a hardcore fan base. Mr&Mrs Smith was 6th big ticket seller foreign movie in 2006( It was released much later than other countries) AJ is very popular in Asia. This is why Japan’s biggest cosmetic company Shiseido hired her to promote their new line in Asia. She represents strong independent female power with humanity.
She has a real star power. Mat Damon said she is a SUPERNOVA.
I know you guys in North America must have been up nearly 24 hours because I’ve seen some of you posting.. and then you are all going to bed, but no an article from the NYTimes has you still posting.. no wonder the tabloids come here to get their stories…it’s highly entertaining..keeps me entertained all day at work…keep it up.
fan says…..
I’m not a fan of the X…can’t stand her, whiney, talentless @@@@ either but there you go.. you have such black and white thinking, either your for AJ and against talentless whiney JA or vice versa…let me tell ya.. I’m for neither.. neither one strikes me as having truly altruistic motives.
Zen that’s not very zen of you… you must care….otherwise you wouldn’t bother to respond.
Keep writing positve about our Angie. Do not discuss the above mentioned article. She (CJ of NYT) is reading all the posts and laughing and admiring herself.
You are free to e-mail her a disgusting letter, but you do not have to let us know, or discuss her article.
Right now this is what she wants, for everyone to give her attention. As far as I am concerned, she does not exist. I am sure Angie is too busy to pay attention to this attack. Let this article die a natural death.
I have to say it does seem strange that the whole article is nearly verbatim what has been discussed her for the last two weeks or so… nearly word for word… how easy has it made her job…I’m a big fan of angies and I hate to think that we’ve given her grist for her so called mill…
dont be fooled x fans alway say they are not fans.Ignore what ever she is calling herself today.keep the positive.
This thing of answering or not answering haters…?!
I am 100% and I wish to propose as follows:
ANSWER THE HATERS. ANSWER EVERY LITTLE THING THEY HAVE TO SAY. THEIR RANTS ARE HARDLY ROOTED IN REALITY, THEIR VOCAB AND GRAMMAR SEVERELY LIMITED, THEIR FACTS NEVER STRAIGHT; THEIR INTELLECT FOUND WANTING. ALWAYS.
I ALWAYS HATED HOW THE INFORMED/THE EDUCATED/THE ENLIGHTENED/THE INTELLECTUALS SAY “DON’T BOTHER YOURSELF WITH THE STUPID, BECAUSE THEY GET WORSE AND STUPIDITY IS INCURABLE ETC.” THIS MAY VERY WELL BE TRUE AS WE EVIDENCE HERE ON A DAILY…
BUT
LEFT UNCHALLENGED, THEY GATHER IN THEIR MASSES AND PRIDE THEMSELVES OF THEIR IGNORANCE - NEXT THING YOU KNOW - THEY ARE US PRESIDENT.
SO THE HATERS MUST BE ANSWERED. HIT THEM WITH THE FACTS AND THE INTELLECT LIKE CLINIQUA CAN UNTIL THEY ARE DIZZY. THIS WILL ULTIMATELY FORCE THEM TO THE BOOKS, FIRST LEARN HOW TO READ AND WRITE, HOW TO SPEAK THE TRUTH, HOW TO DEBATE INTELLIGENTLY. THEN THEY CAN AT LEAST TRY AND TALK ON OUR LEVEL.
THEN MAYBE WE CAN HAVE MORE DECENT HUMAN BEINGS ALL AROUND.
THAT WHOLE FORGIVE THEM FOR THEY KNOW NOT WHAT THEY DO… BY ALL MEANS, FORGIVE THEM. AFTER YOU SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT.
THE TRUTH MUST PREVAIL. EVEN IF IT MEANS LONGER THREADS.
489
I think it’s time everyone accepted Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 6:01 am
Zen that’s not very zen of you… you must care….otherwise you wouldn’t bother to respond.
-
Repeat: I don’t care about your lame opinion.
I don’t care if you like Angie or not as I will always admire her for what she does for UNHCR.
answering the haters for 2 years,come on and I KNOW THAT POST COME FROM AN X FAN.YOU ARE NOT FOOLING ANYONE
208
stardust Says:
January 21st, 2007 at 4:09 pm
I was reading what the People’s website story said about Angelina’s trip to Vietnam. How the Maddox Jolie Project and the World Bank are trying start a project to help farmers grow and sell bamboo. The part that really made me sit back and think:
The project could raise farmer’s income from $25 a month to almost $300 a month.
This is what Angelina is all about and what she’s trying to do. Can you imagine living life on $25 a month and then having people assist you in a way that it could help you increase your monthly income 12 times as much. Being able to earn $300 a month is going to significantly raise the standard of living for these farmers and their families. I have seen lots of people living in extreme cases of poverty. In India, it was a part of daily life to see kids sleeping on the sidewalks or parents literally begging for food.
If some people only want to focus on how Brad looks or who’s copying who, that’s fine, but that kind of petty fighting will not accomplish anything. I think Angelina realized that and anyone who has seen people live in such extreme poverty will realize what really matters.
***************************************************************
TO STARDUST,AFRICAN GIRL,CLINIQUA,PASSING THROUGH,TEAM LARA CROFT AND EVERYONE OUT THERE
***************************************************************
Am also from India. studied and lived in Pune for 12 years until we moved here to Ghana, West AFrica in 2003
I like the fact you pointed out that what Angie is trying to do for the farmers in Cambodia i.e. increasing their income from 25$ to $300, which is an incredile project, as individuals from another third world country, I think we understand this perfectly which our peers from developed countries might find it a little difficult to understand the situation for which I don’t blame them, coz they’ve never really witnessed or seen such conditions!
This is the very reason why I’ve become a Brangelilna fan of course, they are good looking and I love their movies oh, yes I love the other movies starring Tom Cruise and others but I’ve fallen hard for this couple. I must confess that the very reason why I am so drawn to this couple is the work they are trying to do or the difference they are trying to make in the lives of the underprivileged people around the world.
Look at Nobel Peace Prize winner (2006) Prof. Muhammad Yunus from Bangladesh, he set up a bank(called Grameen bank) for micro financing(small loans of about $75) small businesses for women in Bangladesh, over the years, it has changed the pathetic lives of millions of women in the country. My husband use to go to Bangladesh as a visiting professor and he would always comment on the work done by Grameen bank and its positive effects on the impoverished women in Bangladesh and when Prof. Yunus won the Noble peace prize in 2006, my husband was excited and he said it was well deserved.
http://www.grameenfoundation.org/nobel_prize/?gclid=CNvos-Ht84kCFQJPQgodTHM1KQ
Now coming to Angie and Brad’s project. Their project is just taking off, and the plans are fantastic. Cambodia is a small country, which means, if all plans go well, and over the years lets say a minimum of 15 to 20 years, their project is gonna change the FACE of cambodia which means the entire country. Imagine a common man’s income from $25 to $300.
I would like draw similarities between Prof. Yunus and The Pitt’s.(I won’t want to call them Brangelina, they don’t deserve that name any longer,sounds too cheap)
1. Their project is on a small country i.e. Bangladesh and Cambodia. Please look at both the countries on your map, they are of the same size.
2. Their project is on the upliftment of the masses. Dr. Yunus on the plight of the women in Bangladesh and The Pitts on the upliftment of the downtrodden i.e. the farmers and the low income group of Cambodia.
3. Dr. Yunus is an educated man, he got the best of American higher education and went back to Bangladesh to change the FACE of Bangladesh especially in the lives of millions of improverished women who would otherwise be in brothels, battered women (beaten up by their husbands) or unemployed.
The Pitts may not have the degrees, but they have their millions and star power. I must admit that the Jolie-Pitt combination is too powerful for anyone to ignore. Therefore, with their millions and their sheer star power they are be able to set up their project and will eventually accomplish their goals with careful planning and execution. WE will continue to pray for them(the Pitts), God will grant them health and strength as they empower the poor around the world.
And for my conclusion.
Prof. Yunus(and his Grameen Bank) was awarded the Noble Peace Prize for his work in Bangladesh.
The Pitts are also working towards a project to uplift people of Cambodia and the country as a whole. And therefore with the help of God and the prayers and well wishes of people around the world. The Pitts will accomplish their goals in Cambodia and therefore, in around 15 to 20 years time, THERE IS A HIGH PROBABILITY OF THE PITTS BEING AWARDED THE NOBLE PEACE PRIZE.
Mind you, “Old Angie” was branded as “wild and crazy” in Hollywood and made it as an A-lister, now that the “New Angie” is turning her “wild and crazy” ways for a positive cause, I AM WAITING TO SEE THE EFFECT YEARS DOWN THE LINE.
I can’t beleive the NYT is taking info from USWeekly. Now, that’s a new low.
the media should leve her alone they should concentrate on the war going in iraq instaed of trying to bring her down. But one thing is sure, truth will always prevail and the Jolie-Pitt family will continue to succeed and their love will continue to be stronger and stronger.
Love them
Pages: « 1 … 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 … 42 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!