Top Stories

Oscar Roundtable: Brad, Leo, Helen & Co.

Oscar Roundtable: Brad, Leo, Helen & Co.

Newsweek sat down with Brad Pitt, Cate Blanchett, Forest Whitaker, Helen Mirren, Penelope Cruz, and Leonardo DiCaprio for their Oscar Roundtable at the Egyptian Theater in Hollywood. Watch the videos here; check out the transcript after the jump! Two excerpts below…

How strippers changed Brad Pitt’s life: “Yeah, my job was to drive them to bachelor parties and things. I’d pick them up, and at the gig I’d collect the money, play the bad Prince tapes and catch the girls’ clothes. It was not a wholesome atmosphere, and it got very depressing. After two months I went in to quit, and the guy said, “Listen, I’ve got this one last gig tonight.” So I did it, and this girl—I’d never met her before—was in an acting class taught by a man named Roy London [a famous acting coach]. I went and checked it out, and it really set me on the path to where I am now.”

When Penelope Cruz knew she was famous: “One day I came out on the street for a walk with my dad, and somebody screamed from a car, “I love you!” And a minute later, somebody else screamed, “Whore!” [Laughter] Then I knew I was famous.”

What did your parents think when you told them you wanted to be an actor?
HELEN MIRREN: My parents were very against the idea, so I trained as a teacher for three years. I was a horrible, really bad teacher. I didn’t become a professional actress until I was about 22.
FOREST WHITAKER: My parents really wanted me to go to West Point—something practical like that. Ten years into my acting career they were still trying to get me to go back to school. I wasn’t making much money, and sometimes really struggling, but I was, like, “No, Ma. This is what I want to do.” Those were difficult conversations because I had my own doubts. It took me a long time to feel comfortable thinking, “I’m an actor. I can do this.”

Cate, is it true that your first acting job was as an extra in an Arabic boxing movie?
CATE BLANCHETT: I was at university studying fine arts, and I took a year off and went traveling. I had 2,500 Australian dollars, which is nothing, and I traveled for a year on that, so I ended up in places like a bunker in Istanbul with water dripping from the ceiling. Later, I was staying in this place in Cairo. I literally had no money, and some Scottish guy who was printing money and passports in the foyer said, “Do you want to earn five Egyptian dollars?” It wasn’t to sleep with anyone. It was to be an extra in this boxing movie, so I said, “Sure.” They had free falafel.
MIRREN: We’re all in it for the free food, actually. We are all, in our hearts, out-of-work actors.


It seems every actor, no matter how successful, thinks he’ll never work again. Do you feel that way, Brad?

BRAD PITT: Not really, no. [Laughter]

You all had some surprising early jobs before you became actors. Forest was a classical tenor. Helen was a sort of carnival barker.
PITT: I had a job driving strippers around.
LEONARDO DICAPRIO: Really?
BLANCHETT: Just last month.
PITT: I love her. Yeah, my job was to drive them to bachelor parties and things. I’d pick them up, and at the gig I’d collect the money, play the bad Prince tapes and catch the girls’ clothes. It was not a wholesome atmosphere, and it got very depressing. After two months I went in to quit, and the guy said, “Listen, I’ve got this one last gig tonight.” So I did it, and this girl—I’d never met her before—was in an acting class taught by a man named Roy London [a famous acting coach]. I went and checked it out, and it really set me on the path to where I am now.

A stripper changed the course of your career.
PITT: [Nods] Strippers changed my life.

We’ll see that in the National Enquirer next week.
PITT: [Looks toward the ceiling] I just want one week off. Just one.

Leo, you made your first film, “This Boy’s Life,” at 16. What was that like?
DICAPRIO: I didn’t know how to conduct myself on a film set. The director, Michael Caton-Jones, really took me under his wing. He said things like, “When you’re rehearsing with Robert De Niro, you don’t talk about what baseball cards you’re collecting.”
MIRREN: I was like a rabbit in headlights for years on film sets, not understanding who was doing what, and how you’re supposed to behave. It is a terrifying environment, really.

Penelope, in “Jamón, Jamón” you played the daughter of a prostitute, and you became a sensation, and a sex symbol, at 17. What was that like?
PENELOPE CRUZ: One day I came out on the street for a walk with my dad, and somebody screamed from a car, “I love you!” And a minute later, somebody else screamed, “Whore!” [Laughter] Then I knew I was famous. It was unbelievable. I was 16 when I made the movie. I didn’t tell my parents, and I was hiding the script from them. Then they took my grandmother to the premiere, and I always felt bad about that. But the movie was good, and it did a lot of good things for my career. Every role I accepted after that I was covered up to here. [Raises her hand to her neck]

Leo, you became a teen idol at an early age also.
DICAPRIO: I had a brief run at that on television, being thrown on the cover of teen magazines, and I was trying to work away from that. I wanted to establish myself as an actor who put a lot of thought into his characters and did good work. And then I did a movie called “Titanic,” and there I was, right back into that position of being looked at as another piece of cute meat.
PITT: That you are. [Laughter]
DICAPRIO: It was pretty disheartening to be objectified like that. I wanted to stop acting for a little bit. It changed my life in a lot of ways, but at the same time, I can’t say that it didn’t give me opportunities. It made me, for the first time, in control of my career. But yeah, it was weird.

Brad, Hollywood wanted you to be a conventional leading man. You didn’t.
PITT: Acting is about discovery, for me, and these “leading man” scripts—Leo can testify to this—they’re all the same guy. You can plug any one of us into it and you get a variation on a theme, but anyone can do it. Where is the discovery in that?
BLANCHETT: So did you guys look to a relationship with a director to help champion the way out?
DICAPRIO: I definitely sought out the relationship with Martin Scorsese. It was important to me to find somebody I could trust. It’s a weird thing to put your performance in another person’s hands. We so often sit in rooms with directors and you hear their vision about a specific project, but there’s a huge difference between what they say and what actually shows up on screen.
PITT: Do directors want you to [play a version] of them?
DICAPRIO: Sometimes you get that feeling, yeah.
MIRREN: It doesn’t happen to women. You get to play their fantasy instead. But you know, [the industry] is always trying to put you in a box, and you’re always having to fight your way out of it. They don’t want you to grow up or grow older or change, so it’s great when a role comes up that allows you to take that next step. It happened with me on “Prime Suspect.” Suddenly I was allowed to look like a woman of the age that I was. I didn’t have to have glamorous lighting. I didn’t have to wear makeup. It was fabulously liberating, and it’s really why I’m still working, because I was allowed to step forward.

Forest, you’ve played roles that weren’t actually written for black actors.
WHITAKER: I had moments where the directors were open enough to let me do that, yeah. In “Good Morning, Vietnam,” my character was written as a nerdy Jewish guy. In “The Color of Money,” the character was originally a Yuppie.
DICAPRIO: Was it really? That character was stellar. I remember seeing you in “The Color of Money” at a very young age, going, “Who is this guy?”
WHITAKER: I was a replacement. They fired somebody, and I flew in and auditioned. That’s how it happened.
MIRREN: My husband [Taylor Hackford] directed … what was it called? Oh, God, I forgot the name of it. Famous movie with Debra Winger?

“An Officer and a Gentleman.”

MIRREN: Thank you. The Lou Gossett Jr. role was written for a white man, and Taylor forced the studio to cast Lou. Lou won an Oscar for it, in fact.

Which movie made you want to become an actor?
CRUZ: Pedro Almodóvar’s “Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down!” I was 13 when I saw that movie. I came out of the theater completely fascinated. I started to become obsessed with Pedro, and I decided then to become an actress.
BLANCHETT: The only role I wanted to play was Lucy in “You’re a Good Man, Charlie Brown.” I also wanted to be Gregory Peck.
PITT: I remember sneaking into “Saturday Night Fever,” and it had a profound effect on me. [Laughter]
MIRREN: The first movie that caught my imagination was “L’Avventura,” by Antonioni. Until then I had seen only Rock Hudson/Doris Day movies, and I wasn’t into them very much.
WHITAKER: When I was a kid there weren’t a lot of black actors working in films, so acting didn’t seem like a possibility. The first actor I remember being struck by was Sidney Poitier.
DICAPRIO: I tried to get an agent when I was around 7. I was a break-dancer and had a mohawk, and I was rejected. I knew I wanted to be an actor, but it wasn’t until “This Boy’s Life,” when I was 16, that I started to research quality films. I remember watching James Dean in “East of Eden.” I said to myself, “Wow, I didn’t know it was possible to give a performance this good.”
PITT: Although you were extraordinaryon “Growing Pains.”
DICAPRIO: Thank you, buddy. As were you.

Leo, didn’t you get thrown off the set of “Romper Room”?
DICAPRIO: Yeah, when I was 3 years old. I ran up to the camera and started shaking it, saying, “Look at me!”

Dustin Hoffman famously asked Laurence Olivier once what acting was all about, and Olivier replied, “Look at me, look at me, look at me.”
MIRREN: I hate being looked at.
BLANCHETT: I think it’s probably “Look into me.” What we perceive to be naturalism or realism has been utterly eroded by so-called reality television, where people are performing themselves. But what we do, actually, is unmask and reveal what it means to be human, and allow someone in. It’s taken me a long time to allow myself to be exposed in front of a camera.
PITT: Acting is really a team sport. A lot of times one actor will become the MVP, but just like in tennis, your game is elevated if you’re playing with someone better. I mean, just look at the way Cate compensated for George Clooney in “The Good German.” [Laughter]

Are there roles that you look at and think, “I wish I could have played that”?
DICAPRIO: Tons. Burt Lancaster in “Sweet Smell of Success.” De Niro in “Taxi Driver.”
CRUZ: Either of the two women in “Terms of Endearment.” Carmen Maura in “Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown.” Shirley MacLaine in “The Apartment.”
BLANCHETT: Anything Elizabeth Taylor has ever done.
MIRREN: It’s not that you want to play the role; you’re inspired by it. It’s not as if you’re sitting there going, “Oh, I would have been better.” [Pause] Well, sometimes you are. [Laughter]
BLANCHETT: There’s a moment in “A Streetcar Named Desire,” where Vivien Leigh has just gone into the bathroom, and Marlon Brando’s banging on the door, and she opens the door and his hand flinches. It’s the most astonishing shot. This guy that Brando could have played with complete brutality, and [instead he shows] his vulnerability, in that hand.
DICAPRIO: I wanted to ask everyone something: we all talk about being “in the zone”—becoming our character—but there are so many technical things that happen when you’re making a movie, it’s impossible not to realize that there’s a camera there, and your character has to emote this specific emotion. Those moments where it all disappears, and you’re really speaking as this other person? I’m lucky if that happens more than once on a movie.
PITT: I find alcohol helps. [Laughter]

When you’re watching a movie, are you always aware of the actors’ technique, or can you get lost in it the way we do?
MIRREN: Completely lost.
BLANCHETT: Well, I didn’t get lost in “Battlefield Earth.”

Was there a role you’d wished you’d played that you didn’t?
BLANCHETT: I’ve been lucky in a way. In school I was tall and my sexuality was dubious. I was always playing men. And then my nationality has been dubious, having played Elizabeth I quite early in my film career. So I feel like I got some weird and wonderful choices.
PITT: [To DiCaprio] Our sexuality has been dubious as well. [Laughter]

Would you care to discuss that?
PITT: No, there’s been enough discussion.
BLANCHETT: We have photographs.

Was there a role that caused you more anxiety than others?
BLANCHETT: They all scare me. But I tell myself that anxiety is just misplaced excitement. You’re constantly risking failure, so I never watch the films I’m in. That way, I always feel like, “OK, that worked.” I had an experience on “Babel” which I’ve never had shooting a film. I thought, “God, that was a really great take.” And then I saw the film, and the whole scene was played on Brad. [Laughter]

Helen, do you know what Queen Elizabeth thinks of your portrayal of her?
MIRREN: Of course I don’t.

Has she seen it?
MIRREN: I’m sure. Who could resist? Someone who is very close to the queen, a great historian named Robert Lacey, said he thinks she would have said, as the credits rolled, “That wasn’t too bad, was it? I think I’ll have a gin and tonic.”
PITT: How did you start shaping her? She’s got this great fireplug walk, and your glasses were always halfway down the bridge of your nose.
MIRREN: Obviously there’s a lot of film on her, but it’s of her in her formal role—hardly anything behind closed doors. Playing a real character, you have to behave likea detective and see things that maybe no one else has. She’s unbelievably composed, but on the films I noticed that her thumb is always turning her wedding ring round and round and round. There’s this inner beat, this tension.

When you’re creating a character, do you need to find something external like that? Penelope, in “Volver”—
CRUZ: I know what you’re going to ask.

You wore a padded butt for your role.
MIRREN: I had a padded butt in “The Queen,” as well. It wasn’t just Penelope.
CRUZ: Oh, I’m so happy! Now every time someone asks me this, I’m going to say, “Helen had one, too.”

Did the butt help?
CRUZ: Completely. Pedro and I didn’t talk about it. Maybe a one-minute conversation. It just made me work in a different way, move in a different way. It was like finding the right shoes for the character.

You’ve all done some impressive accent work in your careers. Cate has done three different ones this year. Is it a hurdle to get over when you’re building a character?
WHITAKER: Accents help me figure out how to move, how to gesture. I think sometimes when an actor’s accent doesn’t work, it’s because it isn’t connected to the body.
MIRREN: Until you nail the accent it is paralyzing. You can’t act—you can’t do anything—because all you can hear is your voice making the wrong sound. What’s even more difficult is what Penelope has done. I think to act in a foreign language is the most unbelievably difficult thing. I can’t imagine it.

Penelope, your first English-language film was “The Hi-Lo Country.” Was that scary?
CRUZ: Oh, so scary. I didn’t understand a word [director] Stephen Frears was saying. He’s very sweet, but he has a very strong accent, and I only knew my dialogue for the character. I was always going to the bathroom to cry and coming back and trying to hide it.

Brad, your Irish Gypsy accent in Guy Ritchie’s “Snatch” is so great that we can’t understand a word you’re saying.
PITT: That was last-minute, night-before, full-panic mode. I kept trying to get the dialect—I probably started a little late—and it was just too stiff. I went to Guy the day before and said, “You’ve got to do this part. I can’t do it.” And he’s, like, “Yeah. Right.” But it occurred to me that the genius of what Benicio Del Toro had done in “The Usual Suspects” was that you couldn’t understand what he was saying a lot of times. So about midnight, I started walking around the North End of London, working on it and working on it, and it just kept getting more and more indecipherable. Thank God it worked.
BLANCHETT: I never think of accents as something that’s slapped on. It’s syntax and rhythm and breath. It’s about when people choose to pause, what words they emphasize. You can say it’s accent, but it’s actually thought process. It’s got to be organic. And I think the earlier you can start the better.

Brad. [He mimics being stabbed in the heart.]

MIRREN: You’re absolutely right. It’s not something that you glom on the top, as if language and accent are separate. Americans are always saying, “Oh, I love your accent.” I don’t have the bloody accent. You’ve got the accent. [Laughter] No, I never say that. I say, “Thank you so much. How sweet of you.”

Do you feel differently about your work than you did when you started acting?
PITT: When I started I had this idea that the films I did defined me, and that my life would be interesting based on the characters I’d chosen. I don’t feel that way anymore. I’m a father now. There are other things that are important to me. I was chasing something that wasn’t fulfilling. I caught myself on the phone the other day—Leo has been playing some real strong men these last few years—and I found myself saying, “I want to play more of a man.” I got off the phone and I thought, “No. Live like a man, and the movies will follow.”
WHITAKER: I had to learn to not divorce my life from my work. My work is a continual process of growth for me; it’s an expansion of myself. In the last couple of years, I’ve been taking things I learn about myself in my work and using it to be more completely there for my kids, my family, my friends. It’s flowing in a complete way. It has been a bit of an awakening.
DICAPRIO: Man, I’ve got to get some kids, huh? I only really started enjoying acting when there was a certain level of detachment from the end result. I remember being 15 and going on 160 auditions, and not getting a single role for a year and a half. I realized I was turning into one of those Hollywood kids: “Hi, I’m Leo! And I’m going to be reading today! Oh yeah, I had a great day at school! I love school!” [Laughter] I had become a product of this system where everyone is aiming to please the director, the casting director, whomever. So I started to think about the character—the work—instead of the result. You know, kids are always asking me what they should do to become actors. You give them the pat answers: “Study your lines. Work hard. Don’t give up.” But what I want to tell them is, “You have to not care what these people think about you.”
MIRREN: You were lucky to learn that at 15. Marlon Brando’s great acting advice was, “Don’t care too much.” I never understood that, because I cared so much, and still do. But what he meant was, let go of that total investment in “Are they going to love me?” “Am I going to be good?” F—- that. Maybe that’s what Brad is saying as well.
PITT: Yeah, but it took me 800 words to say what he did in four.

You’re all rich. You’re all famous. You’ve all received critical acclaim. Why work? Why keep acting?
DICAPRIO: I love it. There’s no other art form in the world that affects me more. There’s nothing that I walk away from feeling transformed by the way I do with cinema. There’s something so gratifying about being burned into celluloid and knowing that I can look back later in life and have stories about those experiences. It’s an amazing gift.
WHITAKER: It’s magic. Who wouldn’t want to be a part of that?
CRUZ: It gives me so much happiness to know that I will never know everything about acting. That fear of not knowing will always be with me, no matter what happens.
PITT: It’s the love for the story, and a respect for the business. I want to be better in it, and better for it. I’m still striving for that. And I believe in the power of films.
BLANCHETT: Krzysztof Kieslowski said that filmmaking is a conversation with an audience. When you’re connecting with other people, it’s utterly thrilling. I feel alive when I’m acting. It’s tragic, but true. I would die in a rehearsal room if I could.

Helen, what keeps you acting?
MIRREN: Money. [Laughter] And it’s incredibly good fun. Of course, there are some intense artistic reasons, but I’m not going to go into them. So, yeah, fun and money.

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Adam Lambert will appear on Thursday's The View - PopEater
  • Zac Efron and Vanessa Hudgens have a fun night with friends - JustJaredJr
  • Is Taylor Lautner gearing up for Max Steel? - PopSugar
  • Evan Rachel Wood and Marilyn Manson are back together again - TheSuperficial
  • Drake and Chris Brown share the cover of Vibe - LaineyGossip
  • A Housewife shows off her gymnastics skills - Celebuzz
  • More women come forward about alleged affairs with Tiger Woods - Dlisted
Apega/WENN

1,036 Comments

Pages: « 118 19 20 [21] 22 23 2442 » Show All
Angie is the real thing! @ 01/22/2007 at 6:50 am

486
konnitiwa Says:

This is why Japan’s biggest cosmetic company Shiseido hired her to promote their new line in Asia. She represents strong independent female power with humanity.

+++++++++++++++++

According to an article in Washington Post, Angelina’s Shiseido commercial made Shiseido lipstick an all time best seller, even surpassing Shiseido’s most optimistic sales projection.

I wonder whether Angelina gets a percentage of the sales. I hope she does, ‘coz many charities will benefit as she is known to donate 1/3 of her earnings to charity.

What a wonderful woman Angie is …. not included among the top 20 richest women in entertainment, yet has donated more to charity than most of them.

That NYT article is NOTHING new. It’s the same crap that was printed last week and the same image “make-over” speculation that’s been printed for the LAST YEAR. Caryn James had NOTHIING else to write about because B&A dominated the news last week.

Lula29 Says:
January 21st, 2007 at 4:29 pm

Why is it that people have to pit two people, Leo and Brad, who obviously get along against each other. They are both very good looking and intelligent men. I don’t care who looks younger or older than who.

And when did youth become the measure of beauty. A person might look young, but still not be attractive. Looking young shouldn’t be the goal, being attractive at your age should be. I think that’s why you have so many crazy looking people walking around with all kinds of plastic surgery trying to perserve their youth, but forgoing real beauty in the process.

For example, young or old, Jennifer Aniston ain’t all that cute. She might look 25 to some, to some, but that doesn’t make her automatically attractive. I’m just using her as an example, because I always hear this, oh she looks young BS and I’m like so.

Brad Pitt looks better with some age on him IMO. He was always so pretty when he was younger, now he looks more and more rugged and manly and I love it. So does Leo. I like the weight on him. He looks like a man.

I’m a big fan of a man. I love them.
*****************************

100% agree.

I was never really interested in the pretty golden boy Brad Pitt. Now that he looks like a real “MAN”. He looks absolutely stunning. Leo too is attractive, a few more years and he will look more manly.

ANSWER THE HATERS @ 01/22/2007 at 6:59 am

Ok - that assumption about ALL BAMZSs being intelligent… scrap that. Most

lurker opinion @ 01/22/2007 at 7:03 am

People People People Most media is crap. We have alot of knowledge about Brad and Angelina so it is easy for us to detect. But the same thing happens about serious things like Iraq. We need to read everything with the understanding that the writer or publication has an agenda.

People,calm down.So there is a bad article in New York Times.So what?Not everyone loves Angelina.So what?Many people attack her.So what?
Angelina has proved that she doesn’t care about what people say about her,so why should we?And if you ask me,i think that all this “bad press” is logical.When a person is on top,everyone is trying to take this person down.When a person is on top causes love and hate,fanatic fans and fanatic haters.That’s how it works.
Angelina is unconventional,indepedent,wild,free,fearless,honest.She is like nothing we have ever seen before.A lot of people can’t stand this,maybe because they can never be like this.A woman that knows no limits,with rare beauty,a great career,fame,a happy family,a gorgeous man,that’s too much for them.But those are the same reasons why millions of people love her and respect her.
I would be much more worried if everyone loved her.That would mean that something is wrong with her.Angelina Jolie is a woman that inspires passionate feelings.There are not many women in the world who can claim that.

496 May

Is there a way I can donate directly to the MJP.thanks

ANSWER THE HATERS @ 01/22/2007 at 7:10 am

If it takes 200 years to break sense into a thick skulls, then so be it.

505
feel THE LUV Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 7:09 am
http://i3.tinypic.com/2cgng9i.jpg

B&A so in luv!

———————————————-
Great pic.Thanks.

I think it’s hilarious that the supposed movie critic from NYT was commenting on how Angie look at GG and her supposed behavior, rather than focusing her attention on the winning actors and films in GG. No wonder these great actors and great movies were overlooked by the public.

I don’t get what the media wants, maybe they are expecting that she can’t handle the pressure anymore and leaves Brad. She’s the one that is getting trashed left and right, not him (In the last couple of months). After all these crap, which most of it was made of misquoting her interviews, this time I really think that when the press junket of AMH is done she’s going to be more reserved, whick sucks. But I wouldn’t blame her, I know she doesn’t care but there is a limit in every person. Finally I don’t have a problem with people disliking angelina, they can say so, BUT using info from a tabloid to make a point when you work at a “serious” newspaper like the NYT is just lame.
Next month Angelina is expected to attend the Berlin Film Festival with Deniro and Matt Damon, it will be interesting to see how she’s going to handle the press after all these ****.

think positive! @ 01/22/2007 at 7:19 am

41
The only thing I am going to say is this Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 2:44 am
The worst possible thing you can all do is turn this article into a major issue. Let it go and it won’t be a big deal. Angelina doesn’t care. Brad doesn’t care and so neither should the fans. Don’t make it a big deal. Angie has always been criticized and it never stopped her from living her life before and it won’t her stop this time. Have you all learnt nothing from the past? How many times have people attacked Angelina and how many times did it all pass over? This will pass as do all things. Don’t worry and focus on the positive and don’t let the people trying to pull you into the trap of continuously mentioning this article fool you. Focus on the positive and stop making things like this a big deal. We have all had this conversation before. It will pass.
• 457
I’m #441 Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 3:12 am
448
AddictedtoBAMZs Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 2:55 am

Why should you think it is not necessary to speak out and defend Angelina?
***
Because neither Angelina, nor Brad, nor any of their friends or family members think it’s necessary to speak out. Since this article just came out and IF someone from the Jolie-Pitt camp does speak out against it then I will take back my reasoning. But until then, that’s my reason for ignoring this kind of bullsh*t that the media puts out.
This article, like everything else is written to gain attention and if it does, then it’s successful, but if it’s not given any merit, then they fail. This is just to provoke a response by Angelina and Brad. Nothing bothers the media more than the fact that Angelina and Brad refuse to play along. They refuse to fall into the trap of having a public war of words with the media for the sake of entertainment. Because if they did, it would only mean more profit for those in the media and it would add more fuel to the fire.
————————-
I 100% agree with this point. I didn’t even click on the link. I didn’t even read it. I realized that it is a negative article by your commentary. Am I the only that I’m not surprised that all these so called ”legimate” outlets are quoting tabloids?? There is not a border line anymore between them. They are all the same. Their circulation is going down and down every day. All they see is $$$. They have realized where their bread is buttered. Sensationalism is bringing money and lot’s of attention. That is exactly what they want to achieve. And the more you are talking about it (even in a dismissing way) the more this kind of articles will surface in the future. It doesn’t matter to them if it gets positive or negative reaction as long as it gets ATTENTION!

And of course they are not writing this kind of articles about other stars because who gives a f*ck about them nowadays?? All they care about is Brad and Angie. THEY are the MONEY all these publications are craving for. Even those who hate them can not seem to get enough of them. They can’t stop talking about them in every chance they get.

The best way to get any kind of revenge in such things is to completely IGNORE THEM. They will finally figure that this irresponsible and crappy journalism and all this negativity towards a certain woman don’t get acknowledged by anyone. It doesn’t make them to sell papers. It doesn’t make any hits in their sites and they are not getting any attention. Hens NO MONEY for them. That is they only way they will stop.

And on another note please try to not get so emotional regarding those kind of worthless things. These things are not affecting Brad and Angie’s lives. As someone already said here Angie had her quotes from her interviews twisted since ages ago and she had her humanitarian work questioned for the first time she started it. And she is rising above it every time and she is still living her life to the fullest. She was in Vietnam working on a project with the MJP center while all the Entertainment shows where picking apart her “attitude” at the Globes. And now she is back with her family in NOLA. If she really cared how she is perceived by others she would have a whole PR team behind her but she doesn’t. Because she is simply DON’T CARE!!!

You may feel frustrated reading all these bullshits around and it’s understandable but that doesn’t reflect to what Angie feels about the situation.

Maybe she even finds it beneficila in someway because all these attention she gets (either positive or negative) will help bring even more light to her humanitarian work and the projects she supports. Maybe more people will be curious to know about those things and there is a chance that they will do a research and try to be more educated even for the sake of critisizing critisize her. I believe that this is the goal she wants to accomplish. That is the kind of person she has proved by her action that she is.

Plus to anyone that said that all of her fans are only posting here is completely naive. I don’t thing that the whole population of America is posting on Jared.. :lol:
And I don’t think that the majority of the people do even care about all this gossip stuff. They admire her for her acting talent and her humanitarian work and that’s it.
And some people must stop thinking that the whole world is America. There are four more continets on this earth that are full of admirers of Angelina and Brad as individuals and as a couple and they don’t give an slight **** about what NYT is writing about them.

feel THE LUV @ 01/22/2007 at 7:19 am

http://i3.tinypic.com/33ng379.jpg

Their joy/happiness in each other…palpable… & this is why detractors are in full panic mode! Too bad! For B&A it gets b-e-t-t-e-r & b-e-t-t-e-r!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ATTN BAMZS FANS….

NEW YORK TIMES
TABLOIDS
NEW YORK POST…everyone…

is lurking here and taking information to use for their articles against Angelina and Brad.

Do not post your hard found articles here.

Just remember they are lurking…

Why are some of you losing your sh#t over this Caryn James of the NYT?This person has ALWAYS hated Brad and Angelina.You can go back to when they first hooked up and this witch was writing c r ap from day one,but guess what IT DIDN”T AFFECT THEM!Jen-Jen is the one at home waiting for the phone to ring EVEN with the media holding her hand the past 2years.She is a almost 40 year old woman with a career haging by a thread.Please shup up about this poison pin article,nothing new from this writer.We have the Oscar nods to look forward to remember?

503
Meli Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 7:04 am

ITA. This always happen on famous persons esp. woman, it seems the society can’t stand a strong, independent successful woman.

think positive! @ 01/22/2007 at 7:29 am

508
jq Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 7:13 am

I think it’s hilarious that the supposed movie critic from NYT was commenting on how Angie look at GG and her supposed behavior, rather than focusing her attention on the winning actors and films in GG. No wonder these great actors and great movies were overlooked by the public.
———————
EXACTLY!! And what is that is what makes THEM sound completely stupid. Anyone with a brain can see through it. In the long run all these publication who wants to call the selves serious continue to get their information through tabloids they will lose all their credibility (if they still have any left) and it will do more harm than good to them.

feel THE LUV @ 01/22/2007 at 7:30 am

caryn james (aka shitzyloon) can take this-

http://i12.tinypic.com/3z1jswm.jpg

oh la la!

jmms@Bradforums @ 01/22/2007 at 7:34 am

I can’t beleive the NYT is using info from UsWeekly, that’s awfull. Usually Angelina doesn’t care what they think or say about her, but everyone has a limit, the last couple of months have been insane and she’s probably more than annoyed. This whole circus has made her loose some credibility (like that comment from the guy in Davos). What they want? are they expecting that she will finally get tired and leave Brad? Is that what the want?.

think positive! @ 01/22/2007 at 7:36 am

516
feel THE LUV Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 7:30 am
———————-
Thank you thank you!! That is just to show how happy and proud Angie was to stand next to her man!! The truth is out there people. If some wants to be delusional let them. Their lies will catch up with them.

In the first pic you posted it seems like like they wanted so bad to kiss each other. Their are both looking at eachothers lips. HOT!!!

jmms@Bradforums,You need to chill!

516
feel THE LUV Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 7:30 am
caryn james (aka shitzyloon) can take this-

http://i12.tinypic.com/3z1jswm.jpg

oh la la!

———————————————
You’re turning the words “focus on positive things” into action.Give us more.

think positive! @ 01/22/2007 at 7:41 am

517
jmms@Bradforums Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 7:34 am
——————–
Can we please stop with these controversies please??

Angie had this kind of press long before she hooked with Brad as Brad had his share of bad press long before he hooked with Angie. Just because this is new for you it doesn’t mean that it’s new for them. And there where worst times than this last tow months in the press about them.

We come to love not by finding the perfect person,but by learning to see an imperfect person perfectly,only after we have lost everything are we free to do anything.Throw things out there and not be perfect and not have answers to anything and see if people understand.

Pages: « 118 19 20 [21] 22 23 2442 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.