Top Stories

Oscar Roundtable: Brad, Leo, Helen & Co.

Oscar Roundtable: Brad, Leo, Helen & Co.

Newsweek sat down with Brad Pitt, Cate Blanchett, Forest Whitaker, Helen Mirren, Penelope Cruz, and Leonardo DiCaprio for their Oscar Roundtable at the Egyptian Theater in Hollywood. Watch the videos here; check out the transcript after the jump! Two excerpts below…

How strippers changed Brad Pitt’s life: “Yeah, my job was to drive them to bachelor parties and things. I’d pick them up, and at the gig I’d collect the money, play the bad Prince tapes and catch the girls’ clothes. It was not a wholesome atmosphere, and it got very depressing. After two months I went in to quit, and the guy said, “Listen, I’ve got this one last gig tonight.” So I did it, and this girl—I’d never met her before—was in an acting class taught by a man named Roy London [a famous acting coach]. I went and checked it out, and it really set me on the path to where I am now.”

When Penelope Cruz knew she was famous: “One day I came out on the street for a walk with my dad, and somebody screamed from a car, “I love you!” And a minute later, somebody else screamed, “Whore!” [Laughter] Then I knew I was famous.”

What did your parents think when you told them you wanted to be an actor?
HELEN MIRREN: My parents were very against the idea, so I trained as a teacher for three years. I was a horrible, really bad teacher. I didn’t become a professional actress until I was about 22.
FOREST WHITAKER: My parents really wanted me to go to West Point—something practical like that. Ten years into my acting career they were still trying to get me to go back to school. I wasn’t making much money, and sometimes really struggling, but I was, like, “No, Ma. This is what I want to do.” Those were difficult conversations because I had my own doubts. It took me a long time to feel comfortable thinking, “I’m an actor. I can do this.”

Cate, is it true that your first acting job was as an extra in an Arabic boxing movie?
CATE BLANCHETT: I was at university studying fine arts, and I took a year off and went traveling. I had 2,500 Australian dollars, which is nothing, and I traveled for a year on that, so I ended up in places like a bunker in Istanbul with water dripping from the ceiling. Later, I was staying in this place in Cairo. I literally had no money, and some Scottish guy who was printing money and passports in the foyer said, “Do you want to earn five Egyptian dollars?” It wasn’t to sleep with anyone. It was to be an extra in this boxing movie, so I said, “Sure.” They had free falafel.
MIRREN: We’re all in it for the free food, actually. We are all, in our hearts, out-of-work actors.


It seems every actor, no matter how successful, thinks he’ll never work again. Do you feel that way, Brad?

BRAD PITT: Not really, no. [Laughter]

You all had some surprising early jobs before you became actors. Forest was a classical tenor. Helen was a sort of carnival barker.
PITT: I had a job driving strippers around.
LEONARDO DICAPRIO: Really?
BLANCHETT: Just last month.
PITT: I love her. Yeah, my job was to drive them to bachelor parties and things. I’d pick them up, and at the gig I’d collect the money, play the bad Prince tapes and catch the girls’ clothes. It was not a wholesome atmosphere, and it got very depressing. After two months I went in to quit, and the guy said, “Listen, I’ve got this one last gig tonight.” So I did it, and this girl—I’d never met her before—was in an acting class taught by a man named Roy London [a famous acting coach]. I went and checked it out, and it really set me on the path to where I am now.

A stripper changed the course of your career.
PITT: [Nods] Strippers changed my life.

We’ll see that in the National Enquirer next week.
PITT: [Looks toward the ceiling] I just want one week off. Just one.

Leo, you made your first film, “This Boy’s Life,” at 16. What was that like?
DICAPRIO: I didn’t know how to conduct myself on a film set. The director, Michael Caton-Jones, really took me under his wing. He said things like, “When you’re rehearsing with Robert De Niro, you don’t talk about what baseball cards you’re collecting.”
MIRREN: I was like a rabbit in headlights for years on film sets, not understanding who was doing what, and how you’re supposed to behave. It is a terrifying environment, really.

Penelope, in “Jamón, Jamón” you played the daughter of a prostitute, and you became a sensation, and a sex symbol, at 17. What was that like?
PENELOPE CRUZ: One day I came out on the street for a walk with my dad, and somebody screamed from a car, “I love you!” And a minute later, somebody else screamed, “Whore!” [Laughter] Then I knew I was famous. It was unbelievable. I was 16 when I made the movie. I didn’t tell my parents, and I was hiding the script from them. Then they took my grandmother to the premiere, and I always felt bad about that. But the movie was good, and it did a lot of good things for my career. Every role I accepted after that I was covered up to here. [Raises her hand to her neck]

Leo, you became a teen idol at an early age also.
DICAPRIO: I had a brief run at that on television, being thrown on the cover of teen magazines, and I was trying to work away from that. I wanted to establish myself as an actor who put a lot of thought into his characters and did good work. And then I did a movie called “Titanic,” and there I was, right back into that position of being looked at as another piece of cute meat.
PITT: That you are. [Laughter]
DICAPRIO: It was pretty disheartening to be objectified like that. I wanted to stop acting for a little bit. It changed my life in a lot of ways, but at the same time, I can’t say that it didn’t give me opportunities. It made me, for the first time, in control of my career. But yeah, it was weird.

Brad, Hollywood wanted you to be a conventional leading man. You didn’t.
PITT: Acting is about discovery, for me, and these “leading man” scripts—Leo can testify to this—they’re all the same guy. You can plug any one of us into it and you get a variation on a theme, but anyone can do it. Where is the discovery in that?
BLANCHETT: So did you guys look to a relationship with a director to help champion the way out?
DICAPRIO: I definitely sought out the relationship with Martin Scorsese. It was important to me to find somebody I could trust. It’s a weird thing to put your performance in another person’s hands. We so often sit in rooms with directors and you hear their vision about a specific project, but there’s a huge difference between what they say and what actually shows up on screen.
PITT: Do directors want you to [play a version] of them?
DICAPRIO: Sometimes you get that feeling, yeah.
MIRREN: It doesn’t happen to women. You get to play their fantasy instead. But you know, [the industry] is always trying to put you in a box, and you’re always having to fight your way out of it. They don’t want you to grow up or grow older or change, so it’s great when a role comes up that allows you to take that next step. It happened with me on “Prime Suspect.” Suddenly I was allowed to look like a woman of the age that I was. I didn’t have to have glamorous lighting. I didn’t have to wear makeup. It was fabulously liberating, and it’s really why I’m still working, because I was allowed to step forward.

Forest, you’ve played roles that weren’t actually written for black actors.
WHITAKER: I had moments where the directors were open enough to let me do that, yeah. In “Good Morning, Vietnam,” my character was written as a nerdy Jewish guy. In “The Color of Money,” the character was originally a Yuppie.
DICAPRIO: Was it really? That character was stellar. I remember seeing you in “The Color of Money” at a very young age, going, “Who is this guy?”
WHITAKER: I was a replacement. They fired somebody, and I flew in and auditioned. That’s how it happened.
MIRREN: My husband [Taylor Hackford] directed … what was it called? Oh, God, I forgot the name of it. Famous movie with Debra Winger?

“An Officer and a Gentleman.”

MIRREN: Thank you. The Lou Gossett Jr. role was written for a white man, and Taylor forced the studio to cast Lou. Lou won an Oscar for it, in fact.

Which movie made you want to become an actor?
CRUZ: Pedro Almodóvar’s “Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down!” I was 13 when I saw that movie. I came out of the theater completely fascinated. I started to become obsessed with Pedro, and I decided then to become an actress.
BLANCHETT: The only role I wanted to play was Lucy in “You’re a Good Man, Charlie Brown.” I also wanted to be Gregory Peck.
PITT: I remember sneaking into “Saturday Night Fever,” and it had a profound effect on me. [Laughter]
MIRREN: The first movie that caught my imagination was “L’Avventura,” by Antonioni. Until then I had seen only Rock Hudson/Doris Day movies, and I wasn’t into them very much.
WHITAKER: When I was a kid there weren’t a lot of black actors working in films, so acting didn’t seem like a possibility. The first actor I remember being struck by was Sidney Poitier.
DICAPRIO: I tried to get an agent when I was around 7. I was a break-dancer and had a mohawk, and I was rejected. I knew I wanted to be an actor, but it wasn’t until “This Boy’s Life,” when I was 16, that I started to research quality films. I remember watching James Dean in “East of Eden.” I said to myself, “Wow, I didn’t know it was possible to give a performance this good.”
PITT: Although you were extraordinaryon “Growing Pains.”
DICAPRIO: Thank you, buddy. As were you.

Leo, didn’t you get thrown off the set of “Romper Room”?
DICAPRIO: Yeah, when I was 3 years old. I ran up to the camera and started shaking it, saying, “Look at me!”

Dustin Hoffman famously asked Laurence Olivier once what acting was all about, and Olivier replied, “Look at me, look at me, look at me.”
MIRREN: I hate being looked at.
BLANCHETT: I think it’s probably “Look into me.” What we perceive to be naturalism or realism has been utterly eroded by so-called reality television, where people are performing themselves. But what we do, actually, is unmask and reveal what it means to be human, and allow someone in. It’s taken me a long time to allow myself to be exposed in front of a camera.
PITT: Acting is really a team sport. A lot of times one actor will become the MVP, but just like in tennis, your game is elevated if you’re playing with someone better. I mean, just look at the way Cate compensated for George Clooney in “The Good German.” [Laughter]

Are there roles that you look at and think, “I wish I could have played that”?
DICAPRIO: Tons. Burt Lancaster in “Sweet Smell of Success.” De Niro in “Taxi Driver.”
CRUZ: Either of the two women in “Terms of Endearment.” Carmen Maura in “Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown.” Shirley MacLaine in “The Apartment.”
BLANCHETT: Anything Elizabeth Taylor has ever done.
MIRREN: It’s not that you want to play the role; you’re inspired by it. It’s not as if you’re sitting there going, “Oh, I would have been better.” [Pause] Well, sometimes you are. [Laughter]
BLANCHETT: There’s a moment in “A Streetcar Named Desire,” where Vivien Leigh has just gone into the bathroom, and Marlon Brando’s banging on the door, and she opens the door and his hand flinches. It’s the most astonishing shot. This guy that Brando could have played with complete brutality, and [instead he shows] his vulnerability, in that hand.
DICAPRIO: I wanted to ask everyone something: we all talk about being “in the zone”—becoming our character—but there are so many technical things that happen when you’re making a movie, it’s impossible not to realize that there’s a camera there, and your character has to emote this specific emotion. Those moments where it all disappears, and you’re really speaking as this other person? I’m lucky if that happens more than once on a movie.
PITT: I find alcohol helps. [Laughter]

When you’re watching a movie, are you always aware of the actors’ technique, or can you get lost in it the way we do?
MIRREN: Completely lost.
BLANCHETT: Well, I didn’t get lost in “Battlefield Earth.”

Was there a role you’d wished you’d played that you didn’t?
BLANCHETT: I’ve been lucky in a way. In school I was tall and my sexuality was dubious. I was always playing men. And then my nationality has been dubious, having played Elizabeth I quite early in my film career. So I feel like I got some weird and wonderful choices.
PITT: [To DiCaprio] Our sexuality has been dubious as well. [Laughter]

Would you care to discuss that?
PITT: No, there’s been enough discussion.
BLANCHETT: We have photographs.

Was there a role that caused you more anxiety than others?
BLANCHETT: They all scare me. But I tell myself that anxiety is just misplaced excitement. You’re constantly risking failure, so I never watch the films I’m in. That way, I always feel like, “OK, that worked.” I had an experience on “Babel” which I’ve never had shooting a film. I thought, “God, that was a really great take.” And then I saw the film, and the whole scene was played on Brad. [Laughter]

Helen, do you know what Queen Elizabeth thinks of your portrayal of her?
MIRREN: Of course I don’t.

Has she seen it?
MIRREN: I’m sure. Who could resist? Someone who is very close to the queen, a great historian named Robert Lacey, said he thinks she would have said, as the credits rolled, “That wasn’t too bad, was it? I think I’ll have a gin and tonic.”
PITT: How did you start shaping her? She’s got this great fireplug walk, and your glasses were always halfway down the bridge of your nose.
MIRREN: Obviously there’s a lot of film on her, but it’s of her in her formal role—hardly anything behind closed doors. Playing a real character, you have to behave likea detective and see things that maybe no one else has. She’s unbelievably composed, but on the films I noticed that her thumb is always turning her wedding ring round and round and round. There’s this inner beat, this tension.

When you’re creating a character, do you need to find something external like that? Penelope, in “Volver”—
CRUZ: I know what you’re going to ask.

You wore a padded butt for your role.
MIRREN: I had a padded butt in “The Queen,” as well. It wasn’t just Penelope.
CRUZ: Oh, I’m so happy! Now every time someone asks me this, I’m going to say, “Helen had one, too.”

Did the butt help?
CRUZ: Completely. Pedro and I didn’t talk about it. Maybe a one-minute conversation. It just made me work in a different way, move in a different way. It was like finding the right shoes for the character.

You’ve all done some impressive accent work in your careers. Cate has done three different ones this year. Is it a hurdle to get over when you’re building a character?
WHITAKER: Accents help me figure out how to move, how to gesture. I think sometimes when an actor’s accent doesn’t work, it’s because it isn’t connected to the body.
MIRREN: Until you nail the accent it is paralyzing. You can’t act—you can’t do anything—because all you can hear is your voice making the wrong sound. What’s even more difficult is what Penelope has done. I think to act in a foreign language is the most unbelievably difficult thing. I can’t imagine it.

Penelope, your first English-language film was “The Hi-Lo Country.” Was that scary?
CRUZ: Oh, so scary. I didn’t understand a word [director] Stephen Frears was saying. He’s very sweet, but he has a very strong accent, and I only knew my dialogue for the character. I was always going to the bathroom to cry and coming back and trying to hide it.

Brad, your Irish Gypsy accent in Guy Ritchie’s “Snatch” is so great that we can’t understand a word you’re saying.
PITT: That was last-minute, night-before, full-panic mode. I kept trying to get the dialect—I probably started a little late—and it was just too stiff. I went to Guy the day before and said, “You’ve got to do this part. I can’t do it.” And he’s, like, “Yeah. Right.” But it occurred to me that the genius of what Benicio Del Toro had done in “The Usual Suspects” was that you couldn’t understand what he was saying a lot of times. So about midnight, I started walking around the North End of London, working on it and working on it, and it just kept getting more and more indecipherable. Thank God it worked.
BLANCHETT: I never think of accents as something that’s slapped on. It’s syntax and rhythm and breath. It’s about when people choose to pause, what words they emphasize. You can say it’s accent, but it’s actually thought process. It’s got to be organic. And I think the earlier you can start the better.

Brad. [He mimics being stabbed in the heart.]

MIRREN: You’re absolutely right. It’s not something that you glom on the top, as if language and accent are separate. Americans are always saying, “Oh, I love your accent.” I don’t have the bloody accent. You’ve got the accent. [Laughter] No, I never say that. I say, “Thank you so much. How sweet of you.”

Do you feel differently about your work than you did when you started acting?
PITT: When I started I had this idea that the films I did defined me, and that my life would be interesting based on the characters I’d chosen. I don’t feel that way anymore. I’m a father now. There are other things that are important to me. I was chasing something that wasn’t fulfilling. I caught myself on the phone the other day—Leo has been playing some real strong men these last few years—and I found myself saying, “I want to play more of a man.” I got off the phone and I thought, “No. Live like a man, and the movies will follow.”
WHITAKER: I had to learn to not divorce my life from my work. My work is a continual process of growth for me; it’s an expansion of myself. In the last couple of years, I’ve been taking things I learn about myself in my work and using it to be more completely there for my kids, my family, my friends. It’s flowing in a complete way. It has been a bit of an awakening.
DICAPRIO: Man, I’ve got to get some kids, huh? I only really started enjoying acting when there was a certain level of detachment from the end result. I remember being 15 and going on 160 auditions, and not getting a single role for a year and a half. I realized I was turning into one of those Hollywood kids: “Hi, I’m Leo! And I’m going to be reading today! Oh yeah, I had a great day at school! I love school!” [Laughter] I had become a product of this system where everyone is aiming to please the director, the casting director, whomever. So I started to think about the character—the work—instead of the result. You know, kids are always asking me what they should do to become actors. You give them the pat answers: “Study your lines. Work hard. Don’t give up.” But what I want to tell them is, “You have to not care what these people think about you.”
MIRREN: You were lucky to learn that at 15. Marlon Brando’s great acting advice was, “Don’t care too much.” I never understood that, because I cared so much, and still do. But what he meant was, let go of that total investment in “Are they going to love me?” “Am I going to be good?” F—- that. Maybe that’s what Brad is saying as well.
PITT: Yeah, but it took me 800 words to say what he did in four.

You’re all rich. You’re all famous. You’ve all received critical acclaim. Why work? Why keep acting?
DICAPRIO: I love it. There’s no other art form in the world that affects me more. There’s nothing that I walk away from feeling transformed by the way I do with cinema. There’s something so gratifying about being burned into celluloid and knowing that I can look back later in life and have stories about those experiences. It’s an amazing gift.
WHITAKER: It’s magic. Who wouldn’t want to be a part of that?
CRUZ: It gives me so much happiness to know that I will never know everything about acting. That fear of not knowing will always be with me, no matter what happens.
PITT: It’s the love for the story, and a respect for the business. I want to be better in it, and better for it. I’m still striving for that. And I believe in the power of films.
BLANCHETT: Krzysztof Kieslowski said that filmmaking is a conversation with an audience. When you’re connecting with other people, it’s utterly thrilling. I feel alive when I’m acting. It’s tragic, but true. I would die in a rehearsal room if I could.

Helen, what keeps you acting?
MIRREN: Money. [Laughter] And it’s incredibly good fun. Of course, there are some intense artistic reasons, but I’m not going to go into them. So, yeah, fun and money.

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Kim Kardashian gets a make-under - PopEater
  • Mark Wahlberg screens The Lovely Bones - PopSugar
  • One of Tiger Woods' alleged mistresses will hold a press conference today - TheSuperficial
  • A magazine makes strange claims about Tom and Katie - Dlisted
  • Two Harry Potter stars get close - LaineyGossip
  • Lady Gaga was deemed ineligible for a Best New Artist Grammy - Celebuzz
  • Ashley Tisdale is Styl'n - JustJaredJr
Jemal Countess/Getty

1,036 Comments

Pages: « 119 20 21 [22] 23 24 2542 » Show All

I am just so glad, Angie is giving them the “silent treatment”.

feel THE LUV… Thanks

#521 think positive!Thank you.I am sick of people crying about this.If the haters want to gett-off on this article,let them.It Will not change a thing, Brad’s career is on FIRE,Jen-Jen can’t buy a job.

feel THE LUV Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 7:19 am
http://i3.tinypic.com/33ng379.jpg

+++++++++++++++

That’s sweet. there are several cute and sweet pic of this happy couple in GG. but ironically these anti-AJ media only saw the glumly pic of Angie.

Angie is the real thing! @ 01/22/2007 at 7:48 am

jmms@Bradforums Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 7:34 am

+++++++++++++++++++

Angelina is meeting with World Bank executives/experts about improving the income of farmers. The real people who call the shots, apporve the loans/donations and sign the cheques are meeting and listening to Angelina Jolie. This is much better than going to Davos … concrete decision making and actions are taking place, instead of giving a speech, whcih may fall on deaf ears.

How many times do we hear Angelina say that she does not care how she is perceived. If Angelina does not worry, why would I worry? Actually her silence just adds to her mystery … causing some people to explode.

think positive! @ 01/22/2007 at 7:53 am

524
Meli Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 7:44 am

I can’t get enough of this picture.

http://pics.livejournal.com/pittimpression2/pic/00137kcf
—————–
Man I can not get enough of it either. God I’m so jealous. I can’t believe that she gets to kiss him any time she wants in any part she wants.. ;)

She deserves it anyway.. :)

feel THE LUV @ 01/22/2007 at 7:58 am

524
Meli Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 7:44 am
I can’t get enough of this picture.

http://pics.livejournal.com/pittimpression2/pic/00137kcf

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Thanks Meli. That was goin’ to be my next one!
Not to worry, plenty more where that came from!

Bradforums @ 01/22/2007 at 7:59 am

For respect, we shoud not copy and paste posts from private forums. Let’s show some class and if anyone has a problem with a poster at bradforums or any other poster in other private Brad or Angelina forum make the trouble there not here.

ANSWER THE HATERS @ 01/22/2007 at 8:02 am

I had to click on this NYT article link and honestly, I am sooo disappointed. It is such a desperate non-article. but I thoroughly understand where it is coming from. Unless you have a Brad this or Angelina that headline, nobody is going to so much even look at your publication. Basic Economics people.

And I pray that NYT and their dog are reading this. Caryn you never even had grace - who are you to talk about a fall from grace? Whilst we throughly understand your need for attention - which you are now getting, there are many ways in which to do it. And you just choose to be less honourable about it. I am sure that is going to get you ahead, considering the amount of traffic all and sundry get on a mere mention of Brad or Angelina.

This whole notion in the media world of “only bad news sell”, is fabricated and it is going to come back and haunt you all. You could have chosen to write a balanced article, you could have chosen to respect that Angelina is a mother, you could have chosen to respect the fact that further tarnishing her reputation might have a negative impact on too too many of those who can’t even afford one meal a day - let alone buy a newspaper. But you are privileged and have a job and clean water and you can walk freely and talk freely. Great stuff for you.

But for every action will always be an equal reaction. Bask in your new-found glory and wait.

feel THE LUV @ 01/22/2007 at 8:03 am

Action speaks louder than voice!

http://i1.tinypic.com/4ca5b8h.jpg

shweet!!!

jmms@Bradforums @ 01/22/2007 at 8:05 am

SORRY!

OT-Ted C is implying in today’s The Awful Truth that Tom and Katie celebrated Suri’s BIRTHDAY very recently at a dinner out in LA. Gossip never ends does it. Look for the fur to fly in tabloids as to this.

Oh jesus Brangelina, Brangelina, Brangelina. I’m so sick of them. To the Leo haters: Leo is way more talented and better looking than Brad. You are just jealous!

feel THE LUV @ 01/22/2007 at 8:10 am

http://i3.tinypic.com/4gsu61s.jpg

all warm & touchy feelin’!

ANSWER THE HATERS @ 01/22/2007 at 8:19 am

leofan….

oh satan Leo Leo. He’s so great. That’s why you’re (NOT) on his sites ans blogspots. That’s why you have such insights to inspire others here to like hime as much as you do. That’s why you’re sick of Brange and Leo isn’t. Brad should be jealous of Leonardo. It’s not like his life is PERFECT and incomparable. No wonder Leonard wants to have kids.

NYCGalnVA @ 01/22/2007 at 8:19 am

Poor US Weekly! While they seek to become “relevant” by providing tabloid fodder to the NYT, People Magazine ALWAYS gets it right about the Jolie-Pitts. It is People Magazine that has the information about Angelina’s trip to Vietnam and it’s purpose while US tries to pump up its circulation numbers with their hackable poll results.

The last US Magazine I brought had Angelina w/ Maddox on the cover with the trying for a baby headline…… and she was already pregnant! While they claim that Angelina told them about moving to NO while at the GG, US magazine has been banned from several venues that involved Brad & Angelina. They have been aced out of the baby & family pictures that Brad & Angie have practically hand delivered to People Magazine.

Angelina is such a confident, “balsy” woman, that she doesn’t care about what folks say about her……and neither should we. Look at it for what it is…..tabloid journalism seeking to be relevant…….If things get to the point that Cindy G needs to respond, she will as I believe she speaks for both of them now, but specifically for Brad……she was on the Red Carpet with them, holding their GG tickets in one pic.

The tabloids plant a seed. We water it by talking about it……causing it to grow and take root in places we never expected……

feel THE LUV @ 01/22/2007 at 8:22 am

http://i12.tinypic.com/2nuq7es.jpg

Always by her side!

Incidentally, all this mouth pieces have the right to whine & what nots,
what about Angelina’s rights. In this so-called land of the free, isn’t she free to come on the red carpet with whatever attitude she chose so long she did not end up disturbing public peace (although that pic. posted by Meli and the smolderin’ one where they were almost kissing was disturbing my peace!!!).
Angelina came out smokin’, elegant, content, happy with her man & therein lies the problem with the “unhappy bunch”. Oh well!

ANSWER THE HATERS @ 01/22/2007 at 8:30 am

THE ONLY REASON PEOPLE HATE ANGELINA IS ONE.

THEY CAN’T BE HER. AND WITH THEIR OWN TALENTS, THEY CAN’T EVEN BE LIKE HER.

TOO BEAUTIFUL TO BE UNDERSTOOD.

Here’s Proof:

“The first time I saw Angelina Jolie she was shimmering in the moonlight of the garden of Hollywood’s excluside Chateau Marmont hotel.

She was wearing jeans and a silky top, but radiated an unnerving sexiness. Her eyes locked into conversation with whoever intrigued her. It was as if they were the only person in the world, which was either charming or shy, depending on which way you looked at her.

Men stared in slack-jawed lust, a little afraid of her. Women stared at the ground or at each other in a mumbling, pouting sort of way.

This was long before there was Angelina and Brad. It was even before Billy Bob.

It seems that Angelina - striking, sexy, strong - is built in a way that women do not warm to. They see her as Alpha Vamp, too gothic to be a real mother.

Well, not any more - she’s having twins. There was never a love cauldron that raised more heat than the Brad/Jennifer/Angelina pot.

Female columnists around the world declared, “Angelina has a mouth designed for hoovering up husbands”.

Slogan T-shirts went on sale last year. Team Aniston outsold Team Jolie 25-1 because women identified with Jennifer’s pain. She was the victim.

She’d been dumped, like every one of them. Angelina is a different kind of woman. Just because she does not wear her pain on her sleeve and play the victim card, it does not mean she’s not vulnerable.

Actually, she does wear her pain on her arm. She has a tattoo, in Latin, that says “What Nourishes Me Also Destroys Me”. She’s a complex individual who has led a complicated life.

She says, “I think it’s more important to be understood than to be loved”.

Maybe that’s the same thing. What nobody seems to understand in this triangle is Brad left Jennifer. Angelina didn’t beg him or cajole him, manipulate or hoover him.

It’s shameful to perpetuate a myth of misogyny that says she was the one lacking in empathy or morals, especially when she states, “To be intimate with a married man when my own father cheated on my mother is not something that I could forgive. I couldn’t look at myself in the morning if I did that. It’s not nice to be breaking up a marriage.”

She was working on a mission in Niger when news reached the world that Jennifer and Brad had finally separated. Interesting the way that chauvinistic prejudice works. Brad was married. Angelina was single. It was Brad’s decision to end his marriage. This is all the evidence we have for sure, and surely it’s unfair for Angelina to carry all the blame.

Why, as women, do we identify with the victim? Angelina is not like other women. This makes her idiosyncratic, powerful, mesmerising. It should not make us hate her. She’s emotionally articulate. She’s lived, she’s learnt, she’s suffered, she’s smart.

She won an Oscar for her role in Girl Interrupted, set in a mental institution, and a Golden Globe for Gia, as the heroin-addicted bisexual model.

She kicked ass with last year’s blockbuster Mr and Mrs Smith, in which she literally tried to blow up her onscreen husband, Pitt.

She also fell for her husband Billy Bob Thornton on the set of Pushing Tin, but, hey, it’s not so unusual to meet your partner at work.

Her body is beautifully sculpted and she’s a true artist. She doesn’t care about the red carpet or handbags. Note, she’s always seen with the same one, a big old thing stuffed with baby paraphernalia. She does not believe in nannies.

“I am not going to be a mother who uses a nanny to do all the hard work while I have fun. That’s not my ethic.”

She works tirelessly, hands on and feet in the mud for the United Nations, and is its greatest ambassador since Audrey Hepburn.

She adopted Maddox in 2001 from Cambodia, while she was researching the part of an Aid worker for Beyond Borders. She adopted Zahara from Ethiopia last year.

The UN High Commissioner for Refugees later appointed her Goodwill Ambassador. There is only one. She is not tokenistic in any way. Not a movie star on a vanity project.

She doesn’t do it to give her life more meaning. She does it to save people’s lives.

Aid workers who worked with her tell how she’s not afraid to ride for two days on a motorbike in the mud without showering. She sees herself as just one extra pair of hands able to dig. She makes $12 million to $20 million (R72 million to R120 million) a movie and gives a third away to charity.

She says, “If I have three million, I know one of them I can live without.”

She doesn’t just turn up and smile. She lobbies Congress to get aid, to get Bills passed, to change the world. In her role as Goodwill Ambassador she has visited more than 15 countries, including Kenya, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Haiti, Kosovo and Sierra Leone. In Pakistan, it was after the earthquake. Brad was with her. She has effected a transformation in him too.

“I put my head together, cover my tattoos, get into my suits, look clean, don’t dress sexy and try to present the woman that I’m not sure I am, but would like to aspire to be a little more. Everyone is always expecting me to be, or it’s been easier, to be the other girl.”

That other girl was from the dark side. The one who admitted to experimenting with drugs, knives and other women. She spoke about them all with searing honesty in a hope to explain herself, alienated her further from the world.

Her father was Jon Voight, the enigmatic actor who starred in Midnight Cowboy. Her mother is actress Marcheline Bertrand. They separated when she was one.

“I was always the punk in school. I didn’t feel clean or pretty. I felt interesting, odd or dark. I could understand the darker things, the moody things, the more emotional things.”

She grew up relating more to pain than happiness. She married actor Jonny Lee Miller when she was in her early 20s wearing black rubber trousers and a white shirt on which she had scrawled his name in blood. They split, but she is still close to him, saying that she was just too young.

“I wanted more from him than I could give him.”

This was the other girl who was hard on herself, who thought she had nothing to give - and now she’s giving so much.

She never thought she would be a mother. She was never the kind of child who was asked to babysit. In fact, when she needed to cry in movies, all she would do was extend her hand and imagine a child taking hold of it. Then the tears would come.

“I was always sure that I would never know that feeling.”

That feeling came when she first picked up baby Maddox at the orphanage in Cambodia. He was the last baby she visited that day. She held him and held him and when he opened his eyes there was a connection that made her whole life change.

With those eyes locked she fitted in a way that she never thought she could. No more slashing herself with knives “just to be able to feel something”.

Now holding Maddox was as profound.

“I held him for the longest time. When he finally woke up and stared at me we stared at each other and I was crying and he smiled.

“My discomfort with children was because I always assumed

I could never make them happy because I was accused of being dark. I wasn’t sure if I could be a great, loving, perfect mom, but

I wanted to be, so bad. He smiled and we hung for a few hours and I could make him happy and we felt like a family.”

Feeling like a happy family was something she had never had and, subsequently, jealously guarded.

She didn’t suddenly fall out of love with Billy Bob Thornton, to whom she was married at the time. Suddenly Maddox was her prime and primal concern. She didn’t think Billy Bob would be a great father to Maddox. “He wasn’t ready.”

This may seem, to the uninitiated, ruthless, but it was also strong and protective. She had changed dramatically. Maddox consumed her world. She didn’t want to be that person who carried a pendant of Billy Bob’s dried blood around her neck. She was more interested in flesh and blood.

She was out of the darkness because of Maddox and was determined he would never know its shadow. Her relationship with her own father had been at times close - and at times destructive. He disapproved of her adopting Maddox. She made the decision to keep him out of her life also, to protect Maddox.

“If you have people who put knots in your stomach, it makes you feel bad about yourself. You cry and then you get them out of your life. Be strong and focus your love elsewhere.

“I had some beautiful times with my father and I don’t think he’s a bad person. I just think we’re not a good family - there’s far too much pain.

“I never wanted to come home and yell at Mad because I was stressed after a bad lunch with my father.

“I am a good mother and a good friend. I am a good adoptive mother because I don’t see blood as family. I see it as time and love. You earn it.”

Although this may seem unorthodox, it doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a logic that is both profound and true. One must take into consideration that her childhood was painful.

Children from troubled upbringings usually only revisit that trouble in their own families, or decide that that will be too painful an experience and therefore never want children of their own.

Angelina had been adamant that she only wanted to adopt children, both because of this past and because “giving birth to one meant I could give one less child a home”.

Now she’s expecting twins, I see this more as a submission to Brad than an angle to ensnare him.

In fact, there was nothing of the ensnaring. She made it clear to him and to the world, if it cared to listen, that she is pretty independent and doesn’t need a man, and at least the kind of man she wanted would be hard to find.

“I just naturally don’t rely on men. That’s part of my problem with relationships. I have to be watchful not to allow myself to be too independent, to allow myself to need a man and let him help me.”

To live a life that is not needy or clingy would be pretty much an ideal one. It would be what most women want to achieve, yet why do we hate her instead of aspire to be like her? Because she’s got Brad? Because she’s a threat? And would we like her more if she were fat?

She is the Alpha female which other Alpha females are genetically programmed to destroy. Alpha females can only attract Alpha males. That is their problem and why they often end up lonely.

What she was looking for in a man was a real man.

Before she and Brad got together this was her plea: “I know if I saw a man who was great with my children that would be it for me.”

In fact, she staunchly protected her children from even meeting men that she might become involved with. She didn’t want any darkness or disappointment and would rather sleep alone with Maddox saying,

“It was Maddox who made me feel like a woman”.The way the media reacted it was as if she used her children as man bait, or at least Brad bait.

Since when did a single mother with two children under four become sexually compelling? Most men would run a mile. Is it only Angelina that makes the exception to the rule and is that why we hate her?

She doesn’t play with her children as a Hollywood fashion accessory. She lives in Buckinghamshire and loves Legoland more than the red carpet. She uses her fame to raise money, not sell herself.

“The press can say what they like about my films or whoever I’ve dated, but misinterpreting something to do with refugees could affect them in a bad way. Maybe the mistakes I’ve made and how I’ve recovered might help somebody. Nobody identifies with a perfect person.”

And here’s the problem. We misjudge her as being too controlled, too perfect, too lusted after. She doesn’t see herself like that at all.

She’s been linked with many of her co-stars, but just because she looks like she has a voracious sexual appetite, doesn’t mean she doesn’t starve herself.

“There was the time that I hadn’t had sex for a year.”

We see the perfect Lara Croft body. We see a luxuriant sexual appetite. She sees herself nervous at addressing Congress and shy as a public speaker, and worries about her capacity to juggle her work and her babies.

When she first got Maddox she had never changed a baby before.

In the middle of Africa with a 7-month-old infant she was daunted.

“I feel most beautiful . . . when I’m in the middle of a field or in the jungle with no make-up on.

I think yeah, that looks like the real me. If only other people would see that as the real Angelina.” - Tribune Foreign Service”

Angelina jolie once said these words ”Without pain there is no suffering.Without suffering we will never learn from our mistakes to make it right,pain and suffering is the key to all windows,without it there is no way of life”

”thats why bad things in life have to be accepted,just like the good things.Life is a double bladed knife.”

So after reading these words from Angelina I am not worried at all,She is a very intelligent woman.IF THERE IS ANY WOMAN WHO KNOWS HOW TO FIGHT FOR HERSELF,IT ANGELINA.BAMZS SIT BACK AND RELAX.

think positive! @ 01/22/2007 at 8:34 am

544
Angelina says Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 8:32 am
——————-
Thank you very much for all the quotes you provited. She is such a grounted and solid person.

538
leofan Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 8:08 am

So, you think Leo is more talented and better looking than Brad, so what?
It doesn’t bother me if you’ll love your Leo forever.
I still love and admire Brad..
And oh, before I forget … for your eyes only, Leofan…check the comment of #539 feel THE LUV.

OT-Ted C is implying in today’s The Awful Truth that Tom and Katie celebrated Suri’s BIRTHDAY very recently at a dinner out in LA. Gossip
++++++++++++++++++++++++
I saw a post about this the other day at JJB, people were saying that they celebrated Suri´s “real birthday” people are never going to let it go.

NYCGalnVA Says:

Thanks for your words of wisdom, especially- “The tabloids plant a seed. We water it by talking about it……causing it to grow and take root in places we never expected……” SO TRUE, AND SOMETHING TO CONSIDER WHEN POSTING A COMMENT.

I too have noticed that Cindy G now appears to speak for both Brad and Angelina if something is said. She was also with them at the GGTOU premiere, and of course with Brad at his solo appearances.

People has aced out US Weekly as to acquiring any accurate info re the Jolie-Pitts, that race has been won by People and is over. US Weekly is now on par with Star, Life and Style, In Touch, OK, and National Enquirer. Good way to pass time in supermarket lines, or to line trash cans.

Suggestion @ 01/22/2007 at 8:43 am

Here’s a suggestion, you guys need to do is form a private forum where you can discuss these things, talk about your course of action away from the prying eyes. By providing links to fans, you’re also providing links to the haters. I’m not suggesting you abandon Just Jared, I’m saying instead of providing links the haters can use for their own agenda here, use the Private Forum.

ANSWER THE HATERS @ 01/22/2007 at 8:46 am

520
jmms@Bradforums Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 7:34 am
I can’t beleive the NYT is using info from UsWeekly, that’s awfull. Usually Angelina doesn’t care what they think or say about her, but everyone has a limit, the last couple of months have been insane and she’s probably more than annoyed. This whole circus has made her loose some credibility (like that comment from the guy in Davos). What they want? are they expecting that she will finally get tired and leave Brad? Is that what the want?.

__________________________________________________________________

I guarantee that Angelina remains UNAFFECTED. If you read the latest news (actual news!), she’s trying to meet high-level executives, she is trying to save lives, she’s trying to create a world that her children can live in.

SHE IS NOT READING TABLOIDS. She can’t afford it, she’s not that rich (sic) in terms of time and opportunity cost. For every made-up story, she could be reading up on nature conservation, or staring into Shi’s big eyes, or running after Zee or teaching Mad to read, or just pinchng herself coz Brad sees nothing but her… y’know whaddamean?

Pages: « 119 20 21 [22] 23 24 2542 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.