Top Stories

Oscar Roundtable: Brad, Leo, Helen & Co.

Oscar Roundtable: Brad, Leo, Helen & Co.

Newsweek sat down with Brad Pitt, Cate Blanchett, Forest Whitaker, Helen Mirren, Penelope Cruz, and Leonardo DiCaprio for their Oscar Roundtable at the Egyptian Theater in Hollywood. Watch the videos here; check out the transcript after the jump! Two excerpts below…

How strippers changed Brad Pitt’s life: “Yeah, my job was to drive them to bachelor parties and things. I’d pick them up, and at the gig I’d collect the money, play the bad Prince tapes and catch the girls’ clothes. It was not a wholesome atmosphere, and it got very depressing. After two months I went in to quit, and the guy said, “Listen, I’ve got this one last gig tonight.” So I did it, and this girl—I’d never met her before—was in an acting class taught by a man named Roy London [a famous acting coach]. I went and checked it out, and it really set me on the path to where I am now.”

When Penelope Cruz knew she was famous: “One day I came out on the street for a walk with my dad, and somebody screamed from a car, “I love you!” And a minute later, somebody else screamed, “Whore!” [Laughter] Then I knew I was famous.”

What did your parents think when you told them you wanted to be an actor?
HELEN MIRREN: My parents were very against the idea, so I trained as a teacher for three years. I was a horrible, really bad teacher. I didn’t become a professional actress until I was about 22.
FOREST WHITAKER: My parents really wanted me to go to West Point—something practical like that. Ten years into my acting career they were still trying to get me to go back to school. I wasn’t making much money, and sometimes really struggling, but I was, like, “No, Ma. This is what I want to do.” Those were difficult conversations because I had my own doubts. It took me a long time to feel comfortable thinking, “I’m an actor. I can do this.”

Cate, is it true that your first acting job was as an extra in an Arabic boxing movie?
CATE BLANCHETT: I was at university studying fine arts, and I took a year off and went traveling. I had 2,500 Australian dollars, which is nothing, and I traveled for a year on that, so I ended up in places like a bunker in Istanbul with water dripping from the ceiling. Later, I was staying in this place in Cairo. I literally had no money, and some Scottish guy who was printing money and passports in the foyer said, “Do you want to earn five Egyptian dollars?” It wasn’t to sleep with anyone. It was to be an extra in this boxing movie, so I said, “Sure.” They had free falafel.
MIRREN: We’re all in it for the free food, actually. We are all, in our hearts, out-of-work actors.


It seems every actor, no matter how successful, thinks he’ll never work again. Do you feel that way, Brad?

BRAD PITT: Not really, no. [Laughter]

You all had some surprising early jobs before you became actors. Forest was a classical tenor. Helen was a sort of carnival barker.
PITT: I had a job driving strippers around.
LEONARDO DICAPRIO: Really?
BLANCHETT: Just last month.
PITT: I love her. Yeah, my job was to drive them to bachelor parties and things. I’d pick them up, and at the gig I’d collect the money, play the bad Prince tapes and catch the girls’ clothes. It was not a wholesome atmosphere, and it got very depressing. After two months I went in to quit, and the guy said, “Listen, I’ve got this one last gig tonight.” So I did it, and this girl—I’d never met her before—was in an acting class taught by a man named Roy London [a famous acting coach]. I went and checked it out, and it really set me on the path to where I am now.

A stripper changed the course of your career.
PITT: [Nods] Strippers changed my life.

We’ll see that in the National Enquirer next week.
PITT: [Looks toward the ceiling] I just want one week off. Just one.

Leo, you made your first film, “This Boy’s Life,” at 16. What was that like?
DICAPRIO: I didn’t know how to conduct myself on a film set. The director, Michael Caton-Jones, really took me under his wing. He said things like, “When you’re rehearsing with Robert De Niro, you don’t talk about what baseball cards you’re collecting.”
MIRREN: I was like a rabbit in headlights for years on film sets, not understanding who was doing what, and how you’re supposed to behave. It is a terrifying environment, really.

Penelope, in “Jamón, Jamón” you played the daughter of a prostitute, and you became a sensation, and a sex symbol, at 17. What was that like?
PENELOPE CRUZ: One day I came out on the street for a walk with my dad, and somebody screamed from a car, “I love you!” And a minute later, somebody else screamed, “Whore!” [Laughter] Then I knew I was famous. It was unbelievable. I was 16 when I made the movie. I didn’t tell my parents, and I was hiding the script from them. Then they took my grandmother to the premiere, and I always felt bad about that. But the movie was good, and it did a lot of good things for my career. Every role I accepted after that I was covered up to here. [Raises her hand to her neck]

Leo, you became a teen idol at an early age also.
DICAPRIO: I had a brief run at that on television, being thrown on the cover of teen magazines, and I was trying to work away from that. I wanted to establish myself as an actor who put a lot of thought into his characters and did good work. And then I did a movie called “Titanic,” and there I was, right back into that position of being looked at as another piece of cute meat.
PITT: That you are. [Laughter]
DICAPRIO: It was pretty disheartening to be objectified like that. I wanted to stop acting for a little bit. It changed my life in a lot of ways, but at the same time, I can’t say that it didn’t give me opportunities. It made me, for the first time, in control of my career. But yeah, it was weird.

Brad, Hollywood wanted you to be a conventional leading man. You didn’t.
PITT: Acting is about discovery, for me, and these “leading man” scripts—Leo can testify to this—they’re all the same guy. You can plug any one of us into it and you get a variation on a theme, but anyone can do it. Where is the discovery in that?
BLANCHETT: So did you guys look to a relationship with a director to help champion the way out?
DICAPRIO: I definitely sought out the relationship with Martin Scorsese. It was important to me to find somebody I could trust. It’s a weird thing to put your performance in another person’s hands. We so often sit in rooms with directors and you hear their vision about a specific project, but there’s a huge difference between what they say and what actually shows up on screen.
PITT: Do directors want you to [play a version] of them?
DICAPRIO: Sometimes you get that feeling, yeah.
MIRREN: It doesn’t happen to women. You get to play their fantasy instead. But you know, [the industry] is always trying to put you in a box, and you’re always having to fight your way out of it. They don’t want you to grow up or grow older or change, so it’s great when a role comes up that allows you to take that next step. It happened with me on “Prime Suspect.” Suddenly I was allowed to look like a woman of the age that I was. I didn’t have to have glamorous lighting. I didn’t have to wear makeup. It was fabulously liberating, and it’s really why I’m still working, because I was allowed to step forward.

Forest, you’ve played roles that weren’t actually written for black actors.
WHITAKER: I had moments where the directors were open enough to let me do that, yeah. In “Good Morning, Vietnam,” my character was written as a nerdy Jewish guy. In “The Color of Money,” the character was originally a Yuppie.
DICAPRIO: Was it really? That character was stellar. I remember seeing you in “The Color of Money” at a very young age, going, “Who is this guy?”
WHITAKER: I was a replacement. They fired somebody, and I flew in and auditioned. That’s how it happened.
MIRREN: My husband [Taylor Hackford] directed … what was it called? Oh, God, I forgot the name of it. Famous movie with Debra Winger?

“An Officer and a Gentleman.”

MIRREN: Thank you. The Lou Gossett Jr. role was written for a white man, and Taylor forced the studio to cast Lou. Lou won an Oscar for it, in fact.

Which movie made you want to become an actor?
CRUZ: Pedro Almodóvar’s “Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down!” I was 13 when I saw that movie. I came out of the theater completely fascinated. I started to become obsessed with Pedro, and I decided then to become an actress.
BLANCHETT: The only role I wanted to play was Lucy in “You’re a Good Man, Charlie Brown.” I also wanted to be Gregory Peck.
PITT: I remember sneaking into “Saturday Night Fever,” and it had a profound effect on me. [Laughter]
MIRREN: The first movie that caught my imagination was “L’Avventura,” by Antonioni. Until then I had seen only Rock Hudson/Doris Day movies, and I wasn’t into them very much.
WHITAKER: When I was a kid there weren’t a lot of black actors working in films, so acting didn’t seem like a possibility. The first actor I remember being struck by was Sidney Poitier.
DICAPRIO: I tried to get an agent when I was around 7. I was a break-dancer and had a mohawk, and I was rejected. I knew I wanted to be an actor, but it wasn’t until “This Boy’s Life,” when I was 16, that I started to research quality films. I remember watching James Dean in “East of Eden.” I said to myself, “Wow, I didn’t know it was possible to give a performance this good.”
PITT: Although you were extraordinaryon “Growing Pains.”
DICAPRIO: Thank you, buddy. As were you.

Leo, didn’t you get thrown off the set of “Romper Room”?
DICAPRIO: Yeah, when I was 3 years old. I ran up to the camera and started shaking it, saying, “Look at me!”

Dustin Hoffman famously asked Laurence Olivier once what acting was all about, and Olivier replied, “Look at me, look at me, look at me.”
MIRREN: I hate being looked at.
BLANCHETT: I think it’s probably “Look into me.” What we perceive to be naturalism or realism has been utterly eroded by so-called reality television, where people are performing themselves. But what we do, actually, is unmask and reveal what it means to be human, and allow someone in. It’s taken me a long time to allow myself to be exposed in front of a camera.
PITT: Acting is really a team sport. A lot of times one actor will become the MVP, but just like in tennis, your game is elevated if you’re playing with someone better. I mean, just look at the way Cate compensated for George Clooney in “The Good German.” [Laughter]

Are there roles that you look at and think, “I wish I could have played that”?
DICAPRIO: Tons. Burt Lancaster in “Sweet Smell of Success.” De Niro in “Taxi Driver.”
CRUZ: Either of the two women in “Terms of Endearment.” Carmen Maura in “Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown.” Shirley MacLaine in “The Apartment.”
BLANCHETT: Anything Elizabeth Taylor has ever done.
MIRREN: It’s not that you want to play the role; you’re inspired by it. It’s not as if you’re sitting there going, “Oh, I would have been better.” [Pause] Well, sometimes you are. [Laughter]
BLANCHETT: There’s a moment in “A Streetcar Named Desire,” where Vivien Leigh has just gone into the bathroom, and Marlon Brando’s banging on the door, and she opens the door and his hand flinches. It’s the most astonishing shot. This guy that Brando could have played with complete brutality, and [instead he shows] his vulnerability, in that hand.
DICAPRIO: I wanted to ask everyone something: we all talk about being “in the zone”—becoming our character—but there are so many technical things that happen when you’re making a movie, it’s impossible not to realize that there’s a camera there, and your character has to emote this specific emotion. Those moments where it all disappears, and you’re really speaking as this other person? I’m lucky if that happens more than once on a movie.
PITT: I find alcohol helps. [Laughter]

When you’re watching a movie, are you always aware of the actors’ technique, or can you get lost in it the way we do?
MIRREN: Completely lost.
BLANCHETT: Well, I didn’t get lost in “Battlefield Earth.”

Was there a role you’d wished you’d played that you didn’t?
BLANCHETT: I’ve been lucky in a way. In school I was tall and my sexuality was dubious. I was always playing men. And then my nationality has been dubious, having played Elizabeth I quite early in my film career. So I feel like I got some weird and wonderful choices.
PITT: [To DiCaprio] Our sexuality has been dubious as well. [Laughter]

Would you care to discuss that?
PITT: No, there’s been enough discussion.
BLANCHETT: We have photographs.

Was there a role that caused you more anxiety than others?
BLANCHETT: They all scare me. But I tell myself that anxiety is just misplaced excitement. You’re constantly risking failure, so I never watch the films I’m in. That way, I always feel like, “OK, that worked.” I had an experience on “Babel” which I’ve never had shooting a film. I thought, “God, that was a really great take.” And then I saw the film, and the whole scene was played on Brad. [Laughter]

Helen, do you know what Queen Elizabeth thinks of your portrayal of her?
MIRREN: Of course I don’t.

Has she seen it?
MIRREN: I’m sure. Who could resist? Someone who is very close to the queen, a great historian named Robert Lacey, said he thinks she would have said, as the credits rolled, “That wasn’t too bad, was it? I think I’ll have a gin and tonic.”
PITT: How did you start shaping her? She’s got this great fireplug walk, and your glasses were always halfway down the bridge of your nose.
MIRREN: Obviously there’s a lot of film on her, but it’s of her in her formal role—hardly anything behind closed doors. Playing a real character, you have to behave likea detective and see things that maybe no one else has. She’s unbelievably composed, but on the films I noticed that her thumb is always turning her wedding ring round and round and round. There’s this inner beat, this tension.

When you’re creating a character, do you need to find something external like that? Penelope, in “Volver”—
CRUZ: I know what you’re going to ask.

You wore a padded butt for your role.
MIRREN: I had a padded butt in “The Queen,” as well. It wasn’t just Penelope.
CRUZ: Oh, I’m so happy! Now every time someone asks me this, I’m going to say, “Helen had one, too.”

Did the butt help?
CRUZ: Completely. Pedro and I didn’t talk about it. Maybe a one-minute conversation. It just made me work in a different way, move in a different way. It was like finding the right shoes for the character.

You’ve all done some impressive accent work in your careers. Cate has done three different ones this year. Is it a hurdle to get over when you’re building a character?
WHITAKER: Accents help me figure out how to move, how to gesture. I think sometimes when an actor’s accent doesn’t work, it’s because it isn’t connected to the body.
MIRREN: Until you nail the accent it is paralyzing. You can’t act—you can’t do anything—because all you can hear is your voice making the wrong sound. What’s even more difficult is what Penelope has done. I think to act in a foreign language is the most unbelievably difficult thing. I can’t imagine it.

Penelope, your first English-language film was “The Hi-Lo Country.” Was that scary?
CRUZ: Oh, so scary. I didn’t understand a word [director] Stephen Frears was saying. He’s very sweet, but he has a very strong accent, and I only knew my dialogue for the character. I was always going to the bathroom to cry and coming back and trying to hide it.

Brad, your Irish Gypsy accent in Guy Ritchie’s “Snatch” is so great that we can’t understand a word you’re saying.
PITT: That was last-minute, night-before, full-panic mode. I kept trying to get the dialect—I probably started a little late—and it was just too stiff. I went to Guy the day before and said, “You’ve got to do this part. I can’t do it.” And he’s, like, “Yeah. Right.” But it occurred to me that the genius of what Benicio Del Toro had done in “The Usual Suspects” was that you couldn’t understand what he was saying a lot of times. So about midnight, I started walking around the North End of London, working on it and working on it, and it just kept getting more and more indecipherable. Thank God it worked.
BLANCHETT: I never think of accents as something that’s slapped on. It’s syntax and rhythm and breath. It’s about when people choose to pause, what words they emphasize. You can say it’s accent, but it’s actually thought process. It’s got to be organic. And I think the earlier you can start the better.

Brad. [He mimics being stabbed in the heart.]

MIRREN: You’re absolutely right. It’s not something that you glom on the top, as if language and accent are separate. Americans are always saying, “Oh, I love your accent.” I don’t have the bloody accent. You’ve got the accent. [Laughter] No, I never say that. I say, “Thank you so much. How sweet of you.”

Do you feel differently about your work than you did when you started acting?
PITT: When I started I had this idea that the films I did defined me, and that my life would be interesting based on the characters I’d chosen. I don’t feel that way anymore. I’m a father now. There are other things that are important to me. I was chasing something that wasn’t fulfilling. I caught myself on the phone the other day—Leo has been playing some real strong men these last few years—and I found myself saying, “I want to play more of a man.” I got off the phone and I thought, “No. Live like a man, and the movies will follow.”
WHITAKER: I had to learn to not divorce my life from my work. My work is a continual process of growth for me; it’s an expansion of myself. In the last couple of years, I’ve been taking things I learn about myself in my work and using it to be more completely there for my kids, my family, my friends. It’s flowing in a complete way. It has been a bit of an awakening.
DICAPRIO: Man, I’ve got to get some kids, huh? I only really started enjoying acting when there was a certain level of detachment from the end result. I remember being 15 and going on 160 auditions, and not getting a single role for a year and a half. I realized I was turning into one of those Hollywood kids: “Hi, I’m Leo! And I’m going to be reading today! Oh yeah, I had a great day at school! I love school!” [Laughter] I had become a product of this system where everyone is aiming to please the director, the casting director, whomever. So I started to think about the character—the work—instead of the result. You know, kids are always asking me what they should do to become actors. You give them the pat answers: “Study your lines. Work hard. Don’t give up.” But what I want to tell them is, “You have to not care what these people think about you.”
MIRREN: You were lucky to learn that at 15. Marlon Brando’s great acting advice was, “Don’t care too much.” I never understood that, because I cared so much, and still do. But what he meant was, let go of that total investment in “Are they going to love me?” “Am I going to be good?” F—- that. Maybe that’s what Brad is saying as well.
PITT: Yeah, but it took me 800 words to say what he did in four.

You’re all rich. You’re all famous. You’ve all received critical acclaim. Why work? Why keep acting?
DICAPRIO: I love it. There’s no other art form in the world that affects me more. There’s nothing that I walk away from feeling transformed by the way I do with cinema. There’s something so gratifying about being burned into celluloid and knowing that I can look back later in life and have stories about those experiences. It’s an amazing gift.
WHITAKER: It’s magic. Who wouldn’t want to be a part of that?
CRUZ: It gives me so much happiness to know that I will never know everything about acting. That fear of not knowing will always be with me, no matter what happens.
PITT: It’s the love for the story, and a respect for the business. I want to be better in it, and better for it. I’m still striving for that. And I believe in the power of films.
BLANCHETT: Krzysztof Kieslowski said that filmmaking is a conversation with an audience. When you’re connecting with other people, it’s utterly thrilling. I feel alive when I’m acting. It’s tragic, but true. I would die in a rehearsal room if I could.

Helen, what keeps you acting?
MIRREN: Money. [Laughter] And it’s incredibly good fun. Of course, there are some intense artistic reasons, but I’m not going to go into them. So, yeah, fun and money.

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Gwyneth Paltrow talks Morocco - LaineyGossip
  • Anne Hathaway and her BF get in a minor accident - PopEater
  • Ashlee Simpson and Bronx head to the mall - PopSugar
  • Elin Nordegren talks to a divorce lawyer - Dlisted
  • Miley Cyrus shops in Dublin - JustJaredJr
  • Courtney Love lashes out on Facebook - TheSuperficial
  • Check out Kristen Stewart as Joan Jett- Celebuzz
Pascal Le Segretain/Getty

1,036 Comments

Pages: « 123 24 25 [26] 27 28 2942 » Show All
sad 4 angie @ 01/22/2007 at 12:58 pm

not beatrice . its good to know that im not the only one that feels this way though.

NYTimes Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 12:57 pm
That NYtimes writer just want to deliver an article to her publication quick and gets her pay, i think she doesnt want to work hard do her own research, so what she did was to get all these quotes from the tabloids and spin it as her own story at Angelina’s expense. I bet she probably ask angelina for an interview and gets rejected. Most of these writers that writes negative stuff on celebrities are those that dont get sitdown interviews from them, and they try to hit them back with negative articles.

She is a mean person, i hope all the emails to her gets to be read by her boss in NYtimes so that he/she will know what a lazy and stupid writer this Caryn james is. NYtimes should fire her!!!!!

Nov visit to Cambodia @ 01/22/2007 at 1:00 pm

Angelina Jolie Makes a Surprise Visit to Cambodia
WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 22, 2006 12:30 PM EST

By Tim Nudd

Angelina Jolie

Angelina Jolie, whose son Maddox is Cambodian, on Tuesday made an unannounced visit to the country, where she is involved in conservation efforts.

Jolie, who had been filming A Mighty Heart in India, paid a brief visit to the Pailin area of northwestern Cambodia, the Associated Press reports.

She was there to meet with officials to discuss a forest conservation project for which she has promised some $1.3 million over five years.

Kong Duong, the head of Pailin information office, said the actress and her party flew in on two helicopters and stayed very briefly before flying out.

Jolie, 31, has also supported Adopt-A-Minefield’s efforts in Cambodia and met with refugees there as part of her role as a United Nations Goodwill Ambassador.

She adopted Maddox, who is now 5, after filming Lara Croft: Tombraider in the country.

623
sad 4 angie Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 12:53 pm

Don’t be sad for angie. She knows she is in a good place right now!!! And she loves Brad.

I bet the writer is racist ritzy.

Hello BAMZS fans….. This is too amusing, sorry but I am ROFLMAF!!!!

We have been throught this for two years and it still is the same old sh*t…….Who gives a rats behind about what tabbies say just to make money. Our wonderful couple have three gorgeous kids and many more to come, they are in love, also great careers.
So, let us celebrate their love and their wonderful and growing family; they are building by ignoring the haters and focusing on their kids, humanitarian efforts and work. We should be backing them up by getting involved. JMHO, that is the best support we can give to the family we have grown to love, not by reacting to lies from tabloids. I just received a wonderful letter from MJP/Cambodian Health Commitee for my X-mas donation for MJP fund. It made me feel good as opposed to fuming over what that short insecure, talentless little shrimp RS said….. IMHO as usual….

OK. if you haven’t seen this video please watch it….. Ohhh, LOVE is a wonderful thing ;-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiAFlieArXQ

OK, back to lurking, miss you all….Love BAMZS forever…..

Re posting links to articles, especially negative ones: I believe someone had pointed out before that these sites live on the number of clicks that they receive. Everytime a fan follows a link from here to the site of, for example, NYT, that click counts in favor of NYT. The more people go to those sites to read negative articles, the more it encourages those sites. May I therefore suggest that if you really need to show others the content of the article, then quote the article in your post, complete with details of the original sitem authorship and date. If you are asking people to email the site, then post also the email address of the publisher, editor and author.

Just a suggestion, of course. Cheers!

dragonfly @ 01/22/2007 at 1:07 pm

619
African Girl Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 12:46 pm
May
Simply put….Give a man a fish, you have fed him for a day, teach a man to fish and you have fed him for a lifetime. Whether people believe it or not, whether they like it or not what AJ and BP are doing in Cambodia is a big deal…..they are changing the Economy of a Country. These people are going from $25 a month to $500 a month. Money they will invest back into the community for say Education, Health care, clean water…e.t.c In the long run, It is in the best interest of the country for its people to be educated and healthy. So yeah, I can safely say you are absolutely right and I agree with your analysis. The JPs are doing a worthy thing and it I won’t be surprised if 20 yrs from now, they are presented with a Noble Prize or if their work in Cambodia receives recognition and used to help other countries.

*****************************************

Yes, yes, and that’s how they are able to be so content and sleep with a clear conscience every night. They know they are doing the right thing and changing the lives of people far, far, away from LA and New York. They aren’t doing it for awards and prizes, they are doing it because they can and they feel a responsibility to help. Sure the Nobel may someday come their way, but I feel that is the furthest thing from their minds right now. If I had their resources and exposure I would like to think I would also be involved more directly with Millenium Villages and other projects, so they certainly have my admiration for doing what they do. It will interesting follow them in the years to come.

Jolie goes to DC @ 01/22/2007 at 1:07 pm

Angelina Jolie Goes to Washington
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 08:00 AM EDT

By Linda Kramer, Maiya Norton and Stephen M. Silverman

After leaving Canada – Angelina Jolie went to Washington, D.C. on Wednesday and put in a full day’s work tied to her role as a United Nations goodwill ambassador.

Her first stop was the ornate Lyndon B. Johnson room of the U.S. Capitol for a Congressional briefing organized by the Global Business Coalition on HIV/AIDS – where someone remarked that she’d given up a night’s sleep to attend the meeting.

Jolie, referring to her young children Maddox and Zahara, laughed and replied: “Actually, it was my first night away from the kids, so it probably was the first night I slept for a few hours.”

She later joined Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and U.S. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) at the Kennedy Center, where the three were speakers at the coalition’s benefit dinner, which raised $1.3 million.

At the Congressional gathering, Jolie sat at a large conference table with Virgin CEO Richard Branson and Sens. Joe Biden, John Kerry and Barbara Boxer, as well as other CEOs and members of Congress. Boxer led off the discussion about pending AIDS legislation, prompting a question from Jolie about where funding would come from. “The U.S. taxpayers,” replied Boxer.

Jolie, who occasionally took notes during the session, noted that her newly adopted daughter is an AIDS orphan, and told the group that she was there “to learn more about what I can do. I’m really trying to understand what we’ve done and haven’t done and why.”

Afterwards, she told PEOPLE that what most impressed her about the two-hour meeting was “how honest everybody was. … I was really excited about the idea of working on a vaccine and how close they were and the chances of that. At the end of the day, this has been a wonderful event to learn so many things.”

She added: “But to feel everybody’s frustration I think was the most surprising. It seems like we’re all, every single person sitting here, very aware that there needs to be a lot more done and that no one has the perfect answer.”

Still, Jolie left the meeting on an upbeat note. “There’s a lot of good will,” she said, “but we all need to work much harder.”

Speaking at the dinner, Clinton got one of the big laughs of the evening when – in reference to Jolie – she pondered the life of a glamorous movie star. “It’s hard being a beautiful celebrity,” Clinton said. “I wouldn’t know, but I’ve got to imagine it has to be very difficult.”

Andrómeda @ 01/22/2007 at 1:07 pm

Oh God the media for North America are crazyyyyy….

I really wish that Angie and Brad with the kids leave USA as soon as possible….Please go to France, Germany, Namibia, any country….Don´t stay there.
USA, your own country doesn´t love you like the rest of the world does.
You are good and nice people, you don´t deserve this.

I love them !!!

Andrómeda @ 01/22/2007 at 1:11 pm

I meant, the media of North America,….sorry for the mistake.

615
sad 4 angie Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 12:36 pm
I really hate Brad for leaving angie hanging like this. he only cares about his own celeb status. he needs to be dumped cause ange might as well be alone and single right now.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Honey don’t be sad for Angie, she has a wonderful and successful career; three wonderful children and a loving parner in BRAD PITT.

Of course nothing will please you more if she were to dump him. You are so transparent, you expect him to go running back to X___.

Get over it honey, it will never happen. Even if They break up, the reunion you all Fanistons are waiting for is not going to happen.

I agree with 635 and I’m an American.

move to namibia? @ 01/22/2007 at 1:13 pm

I think they should move to another country where they can be happier. They will never find any peace in the United States.

They should move to Europe. At least some countries like France have laws againts paparazzis.

I WOULD LIKE TO SAY GOOD JOB TO ALL OF AJ FANS WHO NEVER LEARN TO LET THINGS GO.YOU are not doing Angelina any good,you take things and run and run with them,why,you made the NYT article more than it was.

Those who formed the Yahoo group should use that to discuss certain things because you are feeding the tabs and blogs.

626
sad 4 angie Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 12:58 pm
not beatrice . its good to know that im not the only one that feels this way though.

I don’t believe you.

sad 4 angie @ 01/22/2007 at 1:24 pm

chinochio can go to hell or blasted to pluto for all I care. I wouldnt put it past tha lame jealous ***** to pay some people to create this supossed backlash ****. the articles are a little ridiculous to be real and we all know what a little $$ can get people to do.

After All That Goodness, a Sudden Fall From Grace

By CARYN JAMES

Before she set a toe on the red carpet at the Golden Globes last week, Angelina Jolie’s carefully molded image as humanitarian and mom was already showing some cracks. The Internet had been flooded with reports, picked up from European interviews, that she had called her biological daughter “a blob” with less personality than her two adopted kids, and had criticized Madonna’s adoption of a baby boy from Malawi. Women’s Wear Daily reported she was being difficult about designs from St. John, the staid company whose ads she appears in and whose conservatively elegant gown she wore to the Globes.

By the time she reached the end of a haughty, humorless walk down that red carpet on Brad Pitt’s arm, the Good Angelina image had crumbled to dust. In the next days columnists from The Washington Post to LA Weekly attacked her for a television interview with Ryan Seacrest on E! that made it clear she was above such drivel. His red carpet questions were drivel, but that was no reason to sneer the words “Cereal, we made cereal” when asked how the family had spent the morning.

Video of the interview was spread and ridiculed on Web sites like TMZ and YouTube; Mr. Seacrest complained about her on his radio show; the current issue of Us Weekly reported on more behavior fit for a queen in an article headlined “An Angelina Backlash?” There was really no need for the question mark.

Once famous as a tattooed wild woman, Ms. Jolie has soared to the saintly realm and plummeted again in record time. Madonna, her only rival in shape-shifting, has maintained the devoted wife and mother image for more than six years now, despite her recent adventures in adoption. Good Angelina didn’t even last two. That shattered image, a lesson in the limits of spin, is the product of a lethal combination: a public that never bought into the reformed persona and a star who may have bought into it too much.

The backlash had been building all along, and not simply because, while married to Billy Bob Thornton, she wore a vial of his blood around her neck. (No fair blaming the press for her vampirish image.) She adopted her son, Maddox, from Cambodia just before that marriage broke up, and has always seemed sincere about motherhood. But from the minute her name was linked to Mr. Pitt’s, there was plenty of snickering at her claim that they were just friends while filming “Mr. and Mrs. Smith,” when he was married to Jennifer Aniston. Only the Jolie-Pitts know the truth; let’s just say the public remains skeptical. Once they became an acknowledged couple, Ms. Jolie assumed a saintly manner, deglamorizing to the point of wearing a bandanna on her head for a “Today” interview while visiting orphans in Africa; did she think viewers wouldn’t spot her cat’s-eye makeup and heavily glossed lips?

Such doubts about the noble Angelina accelerated especially fast over the last month. In the January issue of Vogue, talking about how her relationship with Mr. Pitt developed, she restated that they were “very, very good friends” for a long time, sounding as disingenuous as ever. And she added, “It was clear he was with his best friend,” which on the surface is matter-of-fact, yet manages to desexualize Ms. Aniston. Venom in the guise of kindness?

The new Us Weekly article reports that Ms. Jolie was “a nightmare” during the Vogue photo shoot with Annie Leibovitz; that she pushed through a crowd at the premiere of “God Grew Tired of Us,” a do-gooder documentary about the lost boys of Sudan that Mr. Pitt helped produce; and that she coolly pulled him away from a conversation with Courtney Cox Arquette, Ms. Aniston’s close friend, at the Golden Globes. Even if some of those incidents are exaggerated, the backlash is real. A kitschy painting of Ms. Jolie as the Virgin Mary holding her children and hovering saintlike above a Wal-Mart, a work too banal to be half-good as satire, made a media splash when it was shown at Art Miami 2007.

The backlash isn’t entirely her fault. The press helped it along by playing fast and loose with her quotations, gleefully picking up the Shiloh-is-a-blob comment without context. In the full interview in British Elle, when Ms. Jolie hesitated in describing her newborn daughter, the reporter suggested the word blob. Ms. Jolie foolishly responded: “Yes, a blob! But now she’s starting to have a personality.”

In response to a question about Madonna, she did tell the French magazine Gala that adoptions are illegal in Malawi and, “I prefer to stay on the right side of the law.” You can almost hear her coo her superiority as she says it, and you can almost hear anyone who reads it thinking, “Witch.” But her first response was to say that the happiness of Madonna’s child is all that matters; most second-hand reports made that seem like an afterthought.

Still, at best her own bumbling led her to this state. At worst, blame her self-importance. When she was interviewed on the Globes red carpet for “Access Hollywood,” she was shown an old clip of herself jumping into a swimming pool fully clothed after the 1999 awards, not exactly a tough reminder of her wild past. Yet New Angelina seemed royally unamused. And while she looked ultra-glamorous at the premiere of her latest film, “The Good Shepherd,” the perfectly upswept hair and self-contained demeanor of her recent appearances have also made her seem plastic.

In part she is suffering from a common problem: movie stars who make too few movies and are forced to coast on their fame. In “The Good Shepherd,” as the wife of a buttoned-down C.I.A. agent (Matt Damon), she goes from vibrant young femme fatale to brittle, middle-aged alcoholic. It’s a fine performance but a minor part. Her next film, “A Mighty Heart,” isn’t scheduled to arrive until June. That leading role might help restore her saintly image; she plays Marianne Pearl, whose husband, Daniel, was kidnapped and murdered while reporting in Pakistan.

But as Ms. Jolie’s horrific month has shown, reshaping an image is harder than you might think. Despite the charity work and the bun on her head, the burning question all along has been: Who is that woman in the St. John suit, and what has she done with Angelina Jolie?

oh god k you think that is new news? lol.

Mediterranean @ 01/22/2007 at 1:31 pm

to 601-ORIGINAL JPF,

This is the way I would have like to tell my feelings and thoughts if my English was much better. It seems like a waste of time to try convincing someone who insists to hate. So, their hatred and jealousy don’t affect me at all. The Jolie-Pitts don’t even know that these dump creatures exist!

to DRAGONFLY,

Thank you very much for your information of bleeding which calmed me down until the morning when I spoke with my doctor.

Thanks to all who have supported me.

Rollin my eyes @ 01/22/2007 at 1:36 pm

http://img108.imageshack.us/my.php?image=shuttersnormal006fq8.jpg

I blame ^ her too. Angelina will get through this she always does.

644
k Says:

Aren’t you horrified with the sexism displayed by a woman towards a woman? I read the whole piece thanks to your efforts, and it is not surprising to see NYT enrolled another sexist writer, following closely D Brooks. If this sexism is something you feel to gloat about, by all means do so.

~curly

Aniston Troll @ 01/22/2007 at 1:38 pm

k Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 1:25 pm
After All That Goodness, a Sudden Fall From Grace

By CARYN JAMES

Before she set a toe on the red carpet at the Golden Globes last week, Angelina Jolie’s carefully molded image as humanitarian and mom was already showing some cracks. The Internet had been flooded with reports, picked up from European interviews, that she had called her biological daughter “a blob” with less personality than her two adopted kids, and had criticized Madonna’s adoption of a baby boy from
______________________________________________

What is your point???? why are posting the NYtimes article again????

OT Lindsey Lohan mother today on The Insider said: “I’m her mother, not her keeper.” I don’t like Lindsey but I really fell bad for her, both of her parents are pretty mess up, I totally get why she end up in rehab, she has a lot of Drew Barrymore in her, I hope that she can get out of the mess.

Pages: « 123 24 25 [26] 27 28 2942 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.