Oscar Roundtable: Brad, Leo, Helen & Co.
Newsweek sat down with Brad Pitt, Cate Blanchett, Forest Whitaker, Helen Mirren, Penelope Cruz, and Leonardo DiCaprio for their Oscar Roundtable at the Egyptian Theater in Hollywood. Watch the videos here; check out the transcript after the jump! Two excerpts below…
How strippers changed Brad Pitt’s life: “Yeah, my job was to drive them to bachelor parties and things. I’d pick them up, and at the gig I’d collect the money, play the bad Prince tapes and catch the girls’ clothes. It was not a wholesome atmosphere, and it got very depressing. After two months I went in to quit, and the guy said, “Listen, I’ve got this one last gig tonight.” So I did it, and this girl—I’d never met her before—was in an acting class taught by a man named Roy London [a famous acting coach]. I went and checked it out, and it really set me on the path to where I am now.”
When Penelope Cruz knew she was famous: “One day I came out on the street for a walk with my dad, and somebody screamed from a car, “I love you!” And a minute later, somebody else screamed, “Whore!” [Laughter] Then I knew I was famous.”
What did your parents think when you told them you wanted to be an actor?
HELEN MIRREN: My parents were very against the idea, so I trained as a teacher for three years. I was a horrible, really bad teacher. I didn’t become a professional actress until I was about 22.
FOREST WHITAKER: My parents really wanted me to go to West Point—something practical like that. Ten years into my acting career they were still trying to get me to go back to school. I wasn’t making much money, and sometimes really struggling, but I was, like, “No, Ma. This is what I want to do.” Those were difficult conversations because I had my own doubts. It took me a long time to feel comfortable thinking, “I’m an actor. I can do this.”
Cate, is it true that your first acting job was as an extra in an Arabic boxing movie?
CATE BLANCHETT: I was at university studying fine arts, and I took a year off and went traveling. I had 2,500 Australian dollars, which is nothing, and I traveled for a year on that, so I ended up in places like a bunker in Istanbul with water dripping from the ceiling. Later, I was staying in this place in Cairo. I literally had no money, and some Scottish guy who was printing money and passports in the foyer said, “Do you want to earn five Egyptian dollars?” It wasn’t to sleep with anyone. It was to be an extra in this boxing movie, so I said, “Sure.” They had free falafel.
MIRREN: We’re all in it for the free food, actually. We are all, in our hearts, out-of-work actors.
It seems every actor, no matter how successful, thinks he’ll never work again. Do you feel that way, Brad?
BRAD PITT: Not really, no. [Laughter]
You all had some surprising early jobs before you became actors. Forest was a classical tenor. Helen was a sort of carnival barker.
PITT: I had a job driving strippers around.
LEONARDO DICAPRIO: Really?
BLANCHETT: Just last month.
PITT: I love her. Yeah, my job was to drive them to bachelor parties and things. I’d pick them up, and at the gig I’d collect the money, play the bad Prince tapes and catch the girls’ clothes. It was not a wholesome atmosphere, and it got very depressing. After two months I went in to quit, and the guy said, “Listen, I’ve got this one last gig tonight.” So I did it, and this girl—I’d never met her before—was in an acting class taught by a man named Roy London [a famous acting coach]. I went and checked it out, and it really set me on the path to where I am now.
A stripper changed the course of your career.
PITT: [Nods] Strippers changed my life.
We’ll see that in the National Enquirer next week.
PITT: [Looks toward the ceiling] I just want one week off. Just one.
Leo, you made your first film, “This Boy’s Life,” at 16. What was that like?
DICAPRIO: I didn’t know how to conduct myself on a film set. The director, Michael Caton-Jones, really took me under his wing. He said things like, “When you’re rehearsing with Robert De Niro, you don’t talk about what baseball cards you’re collecting.”
MIRREN: I was like a rabbit in headlights for years on film sets, not understanding who was doing what, and how you’re supposed to behave. It is a terrifying environment, really.
Penelope, in “Jamón, Jamón” you played the daughter of a prostitute, and you became a sensation, and a sex symbol, at 17. What was that like?
PENELOPE CRUZ: One day I came out on the street for a walk with my dad, and somebody screamed from a car, “I love you!” And a minute later, somebody else screamed, “Whore!” [Laughter] Then I knew I was famous. It was unbelievable. I was 16 when I made the movie. I didn’t tell my parents, and I was hiding the script from them. Then they took my grandmother to the premiere, and I always felt bad about that. But the movie was good, and it did a lot of good things for my career. Every role I accepted after that I was covered up to here. [Raises her hand to her neck]
Leo, you became a teen idol at an early age also.
DICAPRIO: I had a brief run at that on television, being thrown on the cover of teen magazines, and I was trying to work away from that. I wanted to establish myself as an actor who put a lot of thought into his characters and did good work. And then I did a movie called “Titanic,” and there I was, right back into that position of being looked at as another piece of cute meat.
PITT: That you are. [Laughter]
DICAPRIO: It was pretty disheartening to be objectified like that. I wanted to stop acting for a little bit. It changed my life in a lot of ways, but at the same time, I can’t say that it didn’t give me opportunities. It made me, for the first time, in control of my career. But yeah, it was weird.
Brad, Hollywood wanted you to be a conventional leading man. You didn’t.
PITT: Acting is about discovery, for me, and these “leading man” scripts—Leo can testify to this—they’re all the same guy. You can plug any one of us into it and you get a variation on a theme, but anyone can do it. Where is the discovery in that?
BLANCHETT: So did you guys look to a relationship with a director to help champion the way out?
DICAPRIO: I definitely sought out the relationship with Martin Scorsese. It was important to me to find somebody I could trust. It’s a weird thing to put your performance in another person’s hands. We so often sit in rooms with directors and you hear their vision about a specific project, but there’s a huge difference between what they say and what actually shows up on screen.
PITT: Do directors want you to [play a version] of them?
DICAPRIO: Sometimes you get that feeling, yeah.
MIRREN: It doesn’t happen to women. You get to play their fantasy instead. But you know, [the industry] is always trying to put you in a box, and you’re always having to fight your way out of it. They don’t want you to grow up or grow older or change, so it’s great when a role comes up that allows you to take that next step. It happened with me on “Prime Suspect.” Suddenly I was allowed to look like a woman of the age that I was. I didn’t have to have glamorous lighting. I didn’t have to wear makeup. It was fabulously liberating, and it’s really why I’m still working, because I was allowed to step forward.
Forest, you’ve played roles that weren’t actually written for black actors.
WHITAKER: I had moments where the directors were open enough to let me do that, yeah. In “Good Morning, Vietnam,” my character was written as a nerdy Jewish guy. In “The Color of Money,” the character was originally a Yuppie.
DICAPRIO: Was it really? That character was stellar. I remember seeing you in “The Color of Money” at a very young age, going, “Who is this guy?”
WHITAKER: I was a replacement. They fired somebody, and I flew in and auditioned. That’s how it happened.
MIRREN: My husband [Taylor Hackford] directed … what was it called? Oh, God, I forgot the name of it. Famous movie with Debra Winger?
“An Officer and a Gentleman.”
MIRREN: Thank you. The Lou Gossett Jr. role was written for a white man, and Taylor forced the studio to cast Lou. Lou won an Oscar for it, in fact.
Which movie made you want to become an actor?
CRUZ: Pedro Almodóvar’s “Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down!” I was 13 when I saw that movie. I came out of the theater completely fascinated. I started to become obsessed with Pedro, and I decided then to become an actress.
BLANCHETT: The only role I wanted to play was Lucy in “You’re a Good Man, Charlie Brown.” I also wanted to be Gregory Peck.
PITT: I remember sneaking into “Saturday Night Fever,” and it had a profound effect on me. [Laughter]
MIRREN: The first movie that caught my imagination was “L’Avventura,” by Antonioni. Until then I had seen only Rock Hudson/Doris Day movies, and I wasn’t into them very much.
WHITAKER: When I was a kid there weren’t a lot of black actors working in films, so acting didn’t seem like a possibility. The first actor I remember being struck by was Sidney Poitier.
DICAPRIO: I tried to get an agent when I was around 7. I was a break-dancer and had a mohawk, and I was rejected. I knew I wanted to be an actor, but it wasn’t until “This Boy’s Life,” when I was 16, that I started to research quality films. I remember watching James Dean in “East of Eden.” I said to myself, “Wow, I didn’t know it was possible to give a performance this good.”
PITT: Although you were extraordinaryon “Growing Pains.”
DICAPRIO: Thank you, buddy. As were you.
Leo, didn’t you get thrown off the set of “Romper Room”?
DICAPRIO: Yeah, when I was 3 years old. I ran up to the camera and started shaking it, saying, “Look at me!”
Dustin Hoffman famously asked Laurence Olivier once what acting was all about, and Olivier replied, “Look at me, look at me, look at me.”
MIRREN: I hate being looked at.
BLANCHETT: I think it’s probably “Look into me.” What we perceive to be naturalism or realism has been utterly eroded by so-called reality television, where people are performing themselves. But what we do, actually, is unmask and reveal what it means to be human, and allow someone in. It’s taken me a long time to allow myself to be exposed in front of a camera.
PITT: Acting is really a team sport. A lot of times one actor will become the MVP, but just like in tennis, your game is elevated if you’re playing with someone better. I mean, just look at the way Cate compensated for George Clooney in “The Good German.” [Laughter]
Are there roles that you look at and think, “I wish I could have played that”?
DICAPRIO: Tons. Burt Lancaster in “Sweet Smell of Success.” De Niro in “Taxi Driver.”
CRUZ: Either of the two women in “Terms of Endearment.” Carmen Maura in “Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown.” Shirley MacLaine in “The Apartment.”
BLANCHETT: Anything Elizabeth Taylor has ever done.
MIRREN: It’s not that you want to play the role; you’re inspired by it. It’s not as if you’re sitting there going, “Oh, I would have been better.” [Pause] Well, sometimes you are. [Laughter]
BLANCHETT: There’s a moment in “A Streetcar Named Desire,” where Vivien Leigh has just gone into the bathroom, and Marlon Brando’s banging on the door, and she opens the door and his hand flinches. It’s the most astonishing shot. This guy that Brando could have played with complete brutality, and [instead he shows] his vulnerability, in that hand.
DICAPRIO: I wanted to ask everyone something: we all talk about being “in the zone”—becoming our character—but there are so many technical things that happen when you’re making a movie, it’s impossible not to realize that there’s a camera there, and your character has to emote this specific emotion. Those moments where it all disappears, and you’re really speaking as this other person? I’m lucky if that happens more than once on a movie.
PITT: I find alcohol helps. [Laughter]
When you’re watching a movie, are you always aware of the actors’ technique, or can you get lost in it the way we do?
MIRREN: Completely lost.
BLANCHETT: Well, I didn’t get lost in “Battlefield Earth.”
Was there a role you’d wished you’d played that you didn’t?
BLANCHETT: I’ve been lucky in a way. In school I was tall and my sexuality was dubious. I was always playing men. And then my nationality has been dubious, having played Elizabeth I quite early in my film career. So I feel like I got some weird and wonderful choices.
PITT: [To DiCaprio] Our sexuality has been dubious as well. [Laughter]
Would you care to discuss that?
PITT: No, there’s been enough discussion.
BLANCHETT: We have photographs.
Was there a role that caused you more anxiety than others?
BLANCHETT: They all scare me. But I tell myself that anxiety is just misplaced excitement. You’re constantly risking failure, so I never watch the films I’m in. That way, I always feel like, “OK, that worked.” I had an experience on “Babel” which I’ve never had shooting a film. I thought, “God, that was a really great take.” And then I saw the film, and the whole scene was played on Brad. [Laughter]
Helen, do you know what Queen Elizabeth thinks of your portrayal of her?
MIRREN: Of course I don’t.
Has she seen it?
MIRREN: I’m sure. Who could resist? Someone who is very close to the queen, a great historian named Robert Lacey, said he thinks she would have said, as the credits rolled, “That wasn’t too bad, was it? I think I’ll have a gin and tonic.”
PITT: How did you start shaping her? She’s got this great fireplug walk, and your glasses were always halfway down the bridge of your nose.
MIRREN: Obviously there’s a lot of film on her, but it’s of her in her formal role—hardly anything behind closed doors. Playing a real character, you have to behave likea detective and see things that maybe no one else has. She’s unbelievably composed, but on the films I noticed that her thumb is always turning her wedding ring round and round and round. There’s this inner beat, this tension.
When you’re creating a character, do you need to find something external like that? Penelope, in “Volver”—
CRUZ: I know what you’re going to ask.
You wore a padded butt for your role.
MIRREN: I had a padded butt in “The Queen,” as well. It wasn’t just Penelope.
CRUZ: Oh, I’m so happy! Now every time someone asks me this, I’m going to say, “Helen had one, too.”
Did the butt help?
CRUZ: Completely. Pedro and I didn’t talk about it. Maybe a one-minute conversation. It just made me work in a different way, move in a different way. It was like finding the right shoes for the character.
You’ve all done some impressive accent work in your careers. Cate has done three different ones this year. Is it a hurdle to get over when you’re building a character?
WHITAKER: Accents help me figure out how to move, how to gesture. I think sometimes when an actor’s accent doesn’t work, it’s because it isn’t connected to the body.
MIRREN: Until you nail the accent it is paralyzing. You can’t act—you can’t do anything—because all you can hear is your voice making the wrong sound. What’s even more difficult is what Penelope has done. I think to act in a foreign language is the most unbelievably difficult thing. I can’t imagine it.
Penelope, your first English-language film was “The Hi-Lo Country.” Was that scary?
CRUZ: Oh, so scary. I didn’t understand a word [director] Stephen Frears was saying. He’s very sweet, but he has a very strong accent, and I only knew my dialogue for the character. I was always going to the bathroom to cry and coming back and trying to hide it.
Brad, your Irish Gypsy accent in Guy Ritchie’s “Snatch” is so great that we can’t understand a word you’re saying.
PITT: That was last-minute, night-before, full-panic mode. I kept trying to get the dialect—I probably started a little late—and it was just too stiff. I went to Guy the day before and said, “You’ve got to do this part. I can’t do it.” And he’s, like, “Yeah. Right.” But it occurred to me that the genius of what Benicio Del Toro had done in “The Usual Suspects” was that you couldn’t understand what he was saying a lot of times. So about midnight, I started walking around the North End of London, working on it and working on it, and it just kept getting more and more indecipherable. Thank God it worked.
BLANCHETT: I never think of accents as something that’s slapped on. It’s syntax and rhythm and breath. It’s about when people choose to pause, what words they emphasize. You can say it’s accent, but it’s actually thought process. It’s got to be organic. And I think the earlier you can start the better.
Brad. [He mimics being stabbed in the heart.]
MIRREN: You’re absolutely right. It’s not something that you glom on the top, as if language and accent are separate. Americans are always saying, “Oh, I love your accent.” I don’t have the bloody accent. You’ve got the accent. [Laughter] No, I never say that. I say, “Thank you so much. How sweet of you.”
Do you feel differently about your work than you did when you started acting?
PITT: When I started I had this idea that the films I did defined me, and that my life would be interesting based on the characters I’d chosen. I don’t feel that way anymore. I’m a father now. There are other things that are important to me. I was chasing something that wasn’t fulfilling. I caught myself on the phone the other day—Leo has been playing some real strong men these last few years—and I found myself saying, “I want to play more of a man.” I got off the phone and I thought, “No. Live like a man, and the movies will follow.”
WHITAKER: I had to learn to not divorce my life from my work. My work is a continual process of growth for me; it’s an expansion of myself. In the last couple of years, I’ve been taking things I learn about myself in my work and using it to be more completely there for my kids, my family, my friends. It’s flowing in a complete way. It has been a bit of an awakening.
DICAPRIO: Man, I’ve got to get some kids, huh? I only really started enjoying acting when there was a certain level of detachment from the end result. I remember being 15 and going on 160 auditions, and not getting a single role for a year and a half. I realized I was turning into one of those Hollywood kids: “Hi, I’m Leo! And I’m going to be reading today! Oh yeah, I had a great day at school! I love school!” [Laughter] I had become a product of this system where everyone is aiming to please the director, the casting director, whomever. So I started to think about the character—the work—instead of the result. You know, kids are always asking me what they should do to become actors. You give them the pat answers: “Study your lines. Work hard. Don’t give up.” But what I want to tell them is, “You have to not care what these people think about you.”
MIRREN: You were lucky to learn that at 15. Marlon Brando’s great acting advice was, “Don’t care too much.” I never understood that, because I cared so much, and still do. But what he meant was, let go of that total investment in “Are they going to love me?” “Am I going to be good?” F—- that. Maybe that’s what Brad is saying as well.
PITT: Yeah, but it took me 800 words to say what he did in four.
You’re all rich. You’re all famous. You’ve all received critical acclaim. Why work? Why keep acting?
DICAPRIO: I love it. There’s no other art form in the world that affects me more. There’s nothing that I walk away from feeling transformed by the way I do with cinema. There’s something so gratifying about being burned into celluloid and knowing that I can look back later in life and have stories about those experiences. It’s an amazing gift.
WHITAKER: It’s magic. Who wouldn’t want to be a part of that?
CRUZ: It gives me so much happiness to know that I will never know everything about acting. That fear of not knowing will always be with me, no matter what happens.
PITT: It’s the love for the story, and a respect for the business. I want to be better in it, and better for it. I’m still striving for that. And I believe in the power of films.
BLANCHETT: Krzysztof Kieslowski said that filmmaking is a conversation with an audience. When you’re connecting with other people, it’s utterly thrilling. I feel alive when I’m acting. It’s tragic, but true. I would die in a rehearsal room if I could.
Helen, what keeps you acting?
MIRREN: Money. [Laughter] And it’s incredibly good fun. Of course, there are some intense artistic reasons, but I’m not going to go into them. So, yeah, fun and money.








Older











1,036 Comments
A whole week has gone by, yet that twit from the NYT is still rehashing about the GG’s! What that reiterates for me is that when there is no news from the Jolie/Pitt camp, the media will simply dig up some old dirt to rehash and voila! we have that senseless, immature, drivel from the NYT. Of course, Angie’s trip to Vietnam last week, to establish some type of loans to improve the lives and economy of many in Cambodia, does not make for sensational copy, so it’s ignored.
Thanks Guli for sharing, and yes, I do agree, some things don’t seem to change when it comes to criticism of Brad & Angie. Yet, I feel that they will endure, and my love and admiration for them only grow, as theirs will too.
http://img108.imageshack.us/my.php?image=shuttersnormal006fq8.jpg
caption this^ “DURRR…. i didn’t do it!”
This is ridiculous. There has NEVER been a more obvious and contrived SMEAR JOB.
AOL has the ‘Angelina Backlash’ story (aka Manufactured Bullsh*t & HIT JOB) on it’s slideshow of headlines when you log on. It links you to, yeah - you guessed it…Caryn James incoherent Us Magazine plagiarized column, where as US did first and before her — she throws the proverbial kitchen sink at AJ’s head.
POSSIBLE CULPRITS BEHIND THE SMEAR and/or HIT JOB:
1) HUVANE/HUVANISTON
2)DONALD TRUMP
3)E!
My vote is Huvane, I see this as a ploy resurrect Manistons waning syndicated tv guest starring career. Because everyone knows, the default position to ‘hating Angelina,’ is ‘loving Maniston,’ she has seen to that with every victimhood embracing rag and mag cover she’s done. The woman is worth 110 mil, with Huvane getting a hefty percentage of that — so you see why Huvane is trying his damndest to revive her through trying to destroy AJ - he bought Maniston a cheesey PCA first, which she geared up for by buying new boobs, and now he’s trying to take Angelina down (I guess he’s seen that Brad is virtually impenetrable, but AJ is fair game…people, especially women, are anxious to hate away on her…so he’s decided to run with it).
Also, Huvane has another one of Brad’s exs who can’t catch a break who just had a bad PR move to contend with. Paltrow. Saying her country of origin are dumb f**ks tends to make you not too popular (can you imagine if AJ had said what she did?), not that she was popular before, but turning Angie into the devil, will aid her as well. Just as it’s aided Madonna, who only weeks ago was being ridiculed and roasted alive by all of these media outlets and mini-vans herself, but let AJ say one misconstrued word perceived to be anti-Madge, and the Angie hate resurrects Madonna as well. ‘Oh, Angelina ‘hates’ Madge and is cutting her down…well, that’s IT!! My 25 year Madonna hating binge is over, ‘cuz I hate AJ more!
It’s all contrived, and all planned.
Donald Trump was a possibility as I could see him contracting with hacks in the press to stick it to her good. I thought it highly bizarre that he showed up at the GGs, knowing that Angie & Brad were going to be reigning supreme on their night! Considering the nasty vile way he slurred her a couple months before on Larry King and elsewhere, that just seemed a deliberate and perverse thing to do. It wouldn’t surprise me for him to have orchestrated something like this either. I think he’s obsessed frankly.
Finally, AJ is not letting this get to her, I’m pretty sure. Bottomline, though I’d rather Angelina was understood and appreciated for the amazing wonderful woman she is…this kind of stuff only makes people MORE famous and larger than life. This happens to legends, it happened to Liz Taylor (talk about a woman who lived her life and gave a hearty F.U. to whoever cared to say a da*n thing to her about how she lived it), Marilyn, Ingrid Bergman, Sophia Loren, Marlon Brando, James Dean…all were unconventional, all came under fire on a constant basis…all are legends.
AJ’s one already and she’s just 31.
Think about that.
Hate is a sign of greatness.
My fav new comedian, Kat Williams put it like this (sound down if you’re at work - if you don’t dig profanity don’t click): http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1562061092
I found the article to be harsh and over exaggerated ironically as he accussed other articles of being. He also sounds petty and like he is trying to pick a fight with her. The NYT’s really has lost its edge.
WTF? The New York Times? Not Surprised. Ever since the Jayson Blair scandal which took down this legenday newspapers reputation by fabricating stories of him being in Iraq, covering the war, while while in reality he was sitting at home in Brooklyn. Ever since then, it’s take what you read in the NYT with a grain of salt.
This Caryn James is another Jayson Blair, fabricating stories out of thin air and using tabloids as a source. No it’s not about Iraq or any other world or national story but still as someone who is part of the UNHCR, she should have been much more careful in getting facts about Angelina. There are many great things Ms. James could have done. First not discuss something that happend last week in Hollywood. It’s called newspaper, not old newspaper. Second coming from the NYT she should have formally asked for an interview with Angelina regarding her recent humanitarian endeavors. It would have been more interesting read.
She could have done a complete recap on the work Angelina has done outside of Hollywood because lord knows Ms. James has done a recap culled from some gossip playbook and has done a rundown on Brad’s film career. There would have been international interest in this article even if many never heard of Angelina before. Maybe it’s too much “work” to do research & fact check. You would thnk she worked at a real newspaper.
Third why is this sexist Caryn Jayson Blair reporting news third hand? It’s not an op-ed piece so why isn’t she reporting things first hand like an “authentic” reporter? Aren’t you supposed to put your personal opinions aside when doing a story and just report the FACTS?
That article was pure trash and most people with a tenth of a brain will recognize it for what it is. We don’t have to do a thing but the regular astute readers of the NYT who may have been tricked into thinking that this was a possibly interesting article out of Hollywood will let the reporter know of their feelings. Ms. Caryn Jayson Blair James blew a golden opportunity not to kiss up to a celebrity but to report facts on a lot of missinformation about Angelina’s works outside of Hollywood.
For those lurking (we know there are tons) who may want to read a little of Angelina’s works away from Hollywood, PREMIERE magazine did a great article last year about celebrities and their humanitarian work. Also read Angelina’s book Notes From My Travel and log into the UNHCR website. So many celebs are doing interesting things besides their work but Angelina is the only one who gets criticised? I want to see someone in the media slam Wyclef Jean for his Yele Haiti fondation or Leo’s enviromental works, or basketball player Dikembe Motumbo’s dedication and building a state of the art hospital in Kinshasa.
All you budding real journalists, take the idea of putting together an article of Angelina’s works and do the research of any organization or foundation she is involved in. Report on her as just another young American woman. You’ll be amazed at the type of article that shines through.
Like most trash articles, Angelina will ignore this too because it’s not an interview she did. It’s some hack rehashing from ***gulp*** tabloiods. That’s a new low. LOL!!!!
bbl.
http://www.unchr.org
http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/help?id=3f94ff664
http://www.dmf.org
http://www.globalgreen.org/
This is the picture that’s all over the net and in newspapers:
http://i3.tinypic.com/2cgng9i.jpg
http://pics.livejournal.com/pittimpression2/pic/00137kcf
I have to go to work now…I´ll post form there if I can….But I want to say this one more time:
I LOVE ANGIE AND I ALWAYS WILL !!!!!
Aniston would be DEVASTATED if ANGELINA was Nominated for another OSCAR! I heard there was a chance that she could be nominated again and then all this crap comes out.
the funny thing is Angelina probably doesn’t even care if she gets nominated or not.
GOOD LUCK to Brad re: the Oscar nominations tomorrow–I would love to see another red carpet appearance by B & A.
Angelina is living her life, loving her man and her children. She does not worry about such silly simple people and neither should we.
You know not everything is from Jennifer Aniston. I feel sorry that you can not have one conversation without bringing her name up. It was one reporters nasty article. Not Jennifer Aniston. Like her or don’t like her. I can’t stand the woman. BUT not everything that is negative is from her side. Angelina Jolie has had plenty of people attacking her for years. Why would anyone all of a sudden believe it Jennifer Aniston behind it? I know I’m going to get a long winded five page reply, too bad I don’t care to read it, in reply to that question. But enough is enough. This is how the media works. They are negative to be negative. Negative sells, it get’s people’s attention. No one here went on and on with long posts about Camboida or Angelina Jolie’s other charity works. You hate this article yet you will go on and on and on about it. Then cry when it is picked up by the blogs and the likes of AOL.
I enjoy reading here but I really doubt some here really understand what a waste of a time this article is. Focus on the positive. People have lives and don’t really care either way about Angelina Jolie or anyone. Just move on from it. And for god’s sake let go of the Jennifer Aniston does everything. Even the Donald Trump may have done it thing is weird.
http://i3.tinypic.com/2cgng9i.jpg
loves it!
Please let it go. They are just words. Play of words to make money. Words will not hurt Angie. The fans (enemies in disguise) have really given this woman the attention she does not deserve.
I don’t think Angelina will be nominated. This is not her year. But I’m crossing my fingers for Brad in Best Supporting Actor and babel is almost a shoo in to be nominated for best Film. It may do like Crash did last year and win it, DESPITE all the other critics lauding Brokeback mountain. I think the Academy, who is getting younger, may resent the over commercialism & promotion of films like Dreamgirls and the overly fawning of certain films to win. There has been no over commercialism and promotion and fawing over Babel. Yet it’s a quality film that has global appeal. Sounds like Babel is the winner to me. LOL!!!!!!
BBL for real this time.
The person who put the NYT article wants you to dicuss it over and over again,dont fall for it,let it go.I cant even believe fans gave that much time to such a silly article.
653
CLINIQUA Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 1:41 pm
This is ridiculous. There has NEVER been a more obvious and contrived SMEAR JOB.
AOL has the ‘Angelina Backlash’ story (aka Manufactured Bullsh*t & HIT JOB) on it’s slideshow of headlines when you log on. It links you to, yeah - you guessed it…Caryn James incoherent Us Magazine plagiarized column, where as US did first and before her — she throws the proverbial kitchen sink at AJ’s head.
POSSIBLE CULPRITS BEHIND THE SMEAR and/or HIT JOB:
1) HUVANE/HUVANISTON
2)DONALD TRUMP
3)E!
My vote is Huvane, I see this as a ploy resurrect Manistons waning syndicated tv guest starring career. Because everyone knows, the default position to ‘hating Angelina,’ is ‘loving Maniston,’ she has seen to that with every victimhood embracing rag and mag cover she’s done. The woman is worth 110 mil, with Huvane getting a hefty percentage of that — so you see why Huvane is trying his damndest to revive her through trying to destroy AJ - he bought Maniston a cheesey PCA first, which she geared up for by buying new boobs, and now he’s trying to take Angelina down (I guess he’s seen that Brad is virtually impenetrable, but AJ is fair game…people, especially women, are anxious to hate away on her…so he’s decided to run with it).
Also, Huvane has another one of Brad’s exs who can’t catch a break who just had a bad PR move to contend with. Paltrow. Saying her country of origin are dumb f**ks tends to make you not too popular (can you imagine if AJ had said what she did?), not that she was popular before, but turning Angie into the devil, will aid her as well. Just as it’s aided Madonna, who only weeks ago was being ridiculed and roasted alive by all of these media outlets and mini-vans herself, but let AJ say one misconstrued word perceived to be anti-Madge, and the Angie hate resurrects Madonna as well. ‘Oh, Angelina ‘hates’ Madge and is cutting her down…well, that’s IT!! My 25 year Madonna hating binge is over, ‘cuz I hate AJ more!
It’s all contrived, and all planned.
Donald Trump was a possibility as I could see him contracting with hacks in the press to stick it to her good. I thought it highly bizarre that he showed up at the GGs, knowing that Angie & Brad were going to be reigning supreme on their night! Considering the nasty vile way he slurred her a couple months before on Larry King and elsewhere, that just seemed a deliberate and perverse thing to do. It wouldn’t surprise me for him to have orchestrated something like this either. I think he’s obsessed frankly.
Finally, AJ is not letting this get to her, I’m pretty sure. Bottomline, though I’d rather Angelina was understood and appreciated for the amazing wonderful woman she is…this kind of stuff only makes people MORE famous and larger than life. This happens to legends, it happened to Liz Taylor (talk about a woman who lived her life and gave a hearty F.U. to whoever cared to say a da*n thing to her about how she lived it), Marilyn, Ingrid Bergman, Sophia Loren, Marlon Brando, James Dean…all were unconventional, all came under fire on a constant basis…all are legends.
AJ’s one already and she’s just 31.
Think about that.
Hate is a sign of greatness.
My fav new comedian, Kat Williams put it like this (sound down if you’re at work - if you don’t dig profanity don’t click): http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1562061092
=====================================================
I love Kat Williams too — even if the profanity is too much for me.
I remember watching his HBO Special and he was talking about the haters and all I could do was shake my head in agreement. People only hate on you when you are living your life and doing something good.
The more some hate on Angie the more other will see through the wool that has been pulled over their eyes. And finally understand the reason so people goes after Angie.
660
Can we move on ? Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 2:01 pm
Open your eyes… this is HOLLYWOOD we’re talking about here. Anything is possible.
one more link before i go.
http://brangelinafans.blogspot.com/2007/01/ok-its-on.html
Thank you to those who have posted the links to those wonderful videos.
Keep them coming!! I am really enjoying them.
Avoid the NYT virus posted by one who wants to get more material for the next publication. DO NOT FALL FOR IT!!!!!!!!!
I had seen the photos, but never read the article…
Do you remember that Maxim cover of Angelina as Woman of the Year 2006?
http://www.maximonline.com/articles/index.aspx?a_id=7350
Gift From the Gods: Angelina Jolie is Our Woman of the Year
She may be the most hyped female star of our time, but what really differentiates this 31-year-old mother of three is her authenticity. From her tireless generosity to her award-winning work to her stunning looks, Angelina Jolie completes a package of mind, body, and spirit that will make her legendary for generations. We wish there were more like her, and celebrate the fact that there never will be.
Maxim, Dec 2006
By James Heidenry
Gazing into Angelina Jolie’s eyes is like beginning a familiar journey. You don’t know how it all started, but the desire to further explore is intense. When did you first notice her? Was it in 1998, when she won a Golden Globe for Gia? Or maybe a year later, after she picked up an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress for Girl, Interrupted? Whenever it was, you probably never imagined this impossible beauty, once better known for her famous father, Jon Voight, and ex-husband Billy Bob Thornton, would become the self-determined woman she is today.
For five years now Angelina has served as a goodwill ambassador for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. And they didn’t call her; she called them. It was while filming Tomb Raider on location in Cambodia—where she met her son, Maddox—that Angelina began her transformation from self-mutilating wild child to citizen-of-the-world activist. And unlike many celebrities who dabble in geopolitics just to pass the time or score a few headlines, Angelina gets her hands dirty.
Brad Pitt’s better half has built mud huts in Tanzania, detonated land mines in Southeast Asia, and visited camps in war-torn Darfur. “I was shocked by what I saw,” she explained. “We cannot ignore the fact that millions of people are out there suffering.” After logging visits to more than 20 countries, Angelina is one of the busiest goodwill ambassadors in UN history. And her charity isn’t limited to face time; she has donated millions of dollars to various causes around the globe.
The Devil and Miss Jolie
The actress’ heart may be as big as Jupiter, but there’s a reason she frequently portrays characters who are either unstable or capable of shedding vats of blood: She’s in touch with her dark side. “When other little girls wanted to be ballet dancers, I kind of wanted to be a vampire,” she once said. Not so long ago, that meant collecting knives and carrying a vial of Billy Bob’s blood around her neck. Now she channels that same ferocity into her hungry intellect. She can quote Keats and reel off statistics like Bill Clinton at a wonkfest. She’s also a licensed pilot, and she performs many of her own stunts.
And Angelina’s dark side is by no means dissipating. With her upcoming CIA drama, The Good Shepherd, and her role as slain journalist Daniel Pearl’s wife in the film A Mighty Heart, the actress has yet to flinch from complicated, emotional projects. Her contradictions—the do-gooder and the bad girl—are something she’s not only aware of but embraces, and they’re perhaps best summed up by a tattoo—one of at least 13—right beneath her navel that reads: quod me nutrit me destruit. Translated from Latin: “That which nourishes me destroys me.”
Appetite for Seduction
Angelina could never be labeled “cute” or “pretty,” because what defines her fiery beauty is that it comes off as a natural extension of her personality. The body of a sexual assassin, the smooth jaw of a fantasy-novel queen, the sultry voice that addresses the whole world as lover…and, of course, those hungry lips. “I need more sex,” she’s famous for saying. “Before I die I want to taste everyone in the world.”
That, of course, is wishful thinking. But so, too, is the quest to define Angelina Jolie the actress, the wife, the mother, the sex bomb. For the only person who’ll ever truly know the soul behind those sultry eyes is the woman looking out from behind them.
523
Meli Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 7:37 am
516
feel THE LUV Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 7:30 am
caryn james (aka shitzyloon) can take this-
http://i12.tinypic.com/3z1jswm.jpg
oh la la!
———————————————
You’re turning the words “focus on positive things” into action.Give us more.
*************************************************
So true, so true, hope the rest of us will follow suit.
516
feel THE LUV Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 7:30 am
caryn james (aka shitzyloon) can take this-
do you really think thats who she is?
653
CLINIQUA
=========
Kat Williams video, soooo true! Like your mama used to say, the’re just jealous.
They were dogging Angelina a LOT worse 2 yrs ago. Getting through this sh!t is like dipping cherries
I’m very sorry for this stupid article! It’s just an unjustifiable attack vs. Angelina, the last one from the US press! If i was in Angie and Brad, after that, i should consider the opportunity to go abroad for ever…maybe in europe, where we love her so much!!
“After logging visits to more than 20 countries, Angelina is one of the busiest goodwill ambassadors in UN history. And her charity isn’t limited to face time; she has donated millions of dollars to various causes around the globe.”
Indie
Done and Done. I hope it makes a difference….thanks for the heads up.
Dragonfly
You know it occured to me as I wrote “20 years from now” that what BP and AJ have chosen to do is not something…anyone interested in instant gratification will undertake. I only hope it will show those people who scream “Phot-Op” and “For Publicity” how serious and committed to BP and AJ are to their Humanitarian work.
I guess JJ is now one stop shop for everything Jolie-Pitt. Have we created a monster?
BBL
Pages: « 1 … 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 … 42 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!