Top Stories

Oscar Roundtable: Brad, Leo, Helen & Co.

Oscar Roundtable: Brad, Leo, Helen & Co.

Newsweek sat down with Brad Pitt, Cate Blanchett, Forest Whitaker, Helen Mirren, Penelope Cruz, and Leonardo DiCaprio for their Oscar Roundtable at the Egyptian Theater in Hollywood. Watch the videos here; check out the transcript after the jump! Two excerpts below…

How strippers changed Brad Pitt’s life: “Yeah, my job was to drive them to bachelor parties and things. I’d pick them up, and at the gig I’d collect the money, play the bad Prince tapes and catch the girls’ clothes. It was not a wholesome atmosphere, and it got very depressing. After two months I went in to quit, and the guy said, “Listen, I’ve got this one last gig tonight.” So I did it, and this girl—I’d never met her before—was in an acting class taught by a man named Roy London [a famous acting coach]. I went and checked it out, and it really set me on the path to where I am now.”

When Penelope Cruz knew she was famous: “One day I came out on the street for a walk with my dad, and somebody screamed from a car, “I love you!” And a minute later, somebody else screamed, “Whore!” [Laughter] Then I knew I was famous.”

What did your parents think when you told them you wanted to be an actor?
HELEN MIRREN: My parents were very against the idea, so I trained as a teacher for three years. I was a horrible, really bad teacher. I didn’t become a professional actress until I was about 22.
FOREST WHITAKER: My parents really wanted me to go to West Point—something practical like that. Ten years into my acting career they were still trying to get me to go back to school. I wasn’t making much money, and sometimes really struggling, but I was, like, “No, Ma. This is what I want to do.” Those were difficult conversations because I had my own doubts. It took me a long time to feel comfortable thinking, “I’m an actor. I can do this.”

Cate, is it true that your first acting job was as an extra in an Arabic boxing movie?
CATE BLANCHETT: I was at university studying fine arts, and I took a year off and went traveling. I had 2,500 Australian dollars, which is nothing, and I traveled for a year on that, so I ended up in places like a bunker in Istanbul with water dripping from the ceiling. Later, I was staying in this place in Cairo. I literally had no money, and some Scottish guy who was printing money and passports in the foyer said, “Do you want to earn five Egyptian dollars?” It wasn’t to sleep with anyone. It was to be an extra in this boxing movie, so I said, “Sure.” They had free falafel.
MIRREN: We’re all in it for the free food, actually. We are all, in our hearts, out-of-work actors.


It seems every actor, no matter how successful, thinks he’ll never work again. Do you feel that way, Brad?

BRAD PITT: Not really, no. [Laughter]

You all had some surprising early jobs before you became actors. Forest was a classical tenor. Helen was a sort of carnival barker.
PITT: I had a job driving strippers around.
LEONARDO DICAPRIO: Really?
BLANCHETT: Just last month.
PITT: I love her. Yeah, my job was to drive them to bachelor parties and things. I’d pick them up, and at the gig I’d collect the money, play the bad Prince tapes and catch the girls’ clothes. It was not a wholesome atmosphere, and it got very depressing. After two months I went in to quit, and the guy said, “Listen, I’ve got this one last gig tonight.” So I did it, and this girl—I’d never met her before—was in an acting class taught by a man named Roy London [a famous acting coach]. I went and checked it out, and it really set me on the path to where I am now.

A stripper changed the course of your career.
PITT: [Nods] Strippers changed my life.

We’ll see that in the National Enquirer next week.
PITT: [Looks toward the ceiling] I just want one week off. Just one.

Leo, you made your first film, “This Boy’s Life,” at 16. What was that like?
DICAPRIO: I didn’t know how to conduct myself on a film set. The director, Michael Caton-Jones, really took me under his wing. He said things like, “When you’re rehearsing with Robert De Niro, you don’t talk about what baseball cards you’re collecting.”
MIRREN: I was like a rabbit in headlights for years on film sets, not understanding who was doing what, and how you’re supposed to behave. It is a terrifying environment, really.

Penelope, in “Jamón, Jamón” you played the daughter of a prostitute, and you became a sensation, and a sex symbol, at 17. What was that like?
PENELOPE CRUZ: One day I came out on the street for a walk with my dad, and somebody screamed from a car, “I love you!” And a minute later, somebody else screamed, “Whore!” [Laughter] Then I knew I was famous. It was unbelievable. I was 16 when I made the movie. I didn’t tell my parents, and I was hiding the script from them. Then they took my grandmother to the premiere, and I always felt bad about that. But the movie was good, and it did a lot of good things for my career. Every role I accepted after that I was covered up to here. [Raises her hand to her neck]

Leo, you became a teen idol at an early age also.
DICAPRIO: I had a brief run at that on television, being thrown on the cover of teen magazines, and I was trying to work away from that. I wanted to establish myself as an actor who put a lot of thought into his characters and did good work. And then I did a movie called “Titanic,” and there I was, right back into that position of being looked at as another piece of cute meat.
PITT: That you are. [Laughter]
DICAPRIO: It was pretty disheartening to be objectified like that. I wanted to stop acting for a little bit. It changed my life in a lot of ways, but at the same time, I can’t say that it didn’t give me opportunities. It made me, for the first time, in control of my career. But yeah, it was weird.

Brad, Hollywood wanted you to be a conventional leading man. You didn’t.
PITT: Acting is about discovery, for me, and these “leading man” scripts—Leo can testify to this—they’re all the same guy. You can plug any one of us into it and you get a variation on a theme, but anyone can do it. Where is the discovery in that?
BLANCHETT: So did you guys look to a relationship with a director to help champion the way out?
DICAPRIO: I definitely sought out the relationship with Martin Scorsese. It was important to me to find somebody I could trust. It’s a weird thing to put your performance in another person’s hands. We so often sit in rooms with directors and you hear their vision about a specific project, but there’s a huge difference between what they say and what actually shows up on screen.
PITT: Do directors want you to [play a version] of them?
DICAPRIO: Sometimes you get that feeling, yeah.
MIRREN: It doesn’t happen to women. You get to play their fantasy instead. But you know, [the industry] is always trying to put you in a box, and you’re always having to fight your way out of it. They don’t want you to grow up or grow older or change, so it’s great when a role comes up that allows you to take that next step. It happened with me on “Prime Suspect.” Suddenly I was allowed to look like a woman of the age that I was. I didn’t have to have glamorous lighting. I didn’t have to wear makeup. It was fabulously liberating, and it’s really why I’m still working, because I was allowed to step forward.

Forest, you’ve played roles that weren’t actually written for black actors.
WHITAKER: I had moments where the directors were open enough to let me do that, yeah. In “Good Morning, Vietnam,” my character was written as a nerdy Jewish guy. In “The Color of Money,” the character was originally a Yuppie.
DICAPRIO: Was it really? That character was stellar. I remember seeing you in “The Color of Money” at a very young age, going, “Who is this guy?”
WHITAKER: I was a replacement. They fired somebody, and I flew in and auditioned. That’s how it happened.
MIRREN: My husband [Taylor Hackford] directed … what was it called? Oh, God, I forgot the name of it. Famous movie with Debra Winger?

“An Officer and a Gentleman.”

MIRREN: Thank you. The Lou Gossett Jr. role was written for a white man, and Taylor forced the studio to cast Lou. Lou won an Oscar for it, in fact.

Which movie made you want to become an actor?
CRUZ: Pedro Almodóvar’s “Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down!” I was 13 when I saw that movie. I came out of the theater completely fascinated. I started to become obsessed with Pedro, and I decided then to become an actress.
BLANCHETT: The only role I wanted to play was Lucy in “You’re a Good Man, Charlie Brown.” I also wanted to be Gregory Peck.
PITT: I remember sneaking into “Saturday Night Fever,” and it had a profound effect on me. [Laughter]
MIRREN: The first movie that caught my imagination was “L’Avventura,” by Antonioni. Until then I had seen only Rock Hudson/Doris Day movies, and I wasn’t into them very much.
WHITAKER: When I was a kid there weren’t a lot of black actors working in films, so acting didn’t seem like a possibility. The first actor I remember being struck by was Sidney Poitier.
DICAPRIO: I tried to get an agent when I was around 7. I was a break-dancer and had a mohawk, and I was rejected. I knew I wanted to be an actor, but it wasn’t until “This Boy’s Life,” when I was 16, that I started to research quality films. I remember watching James Dean in “East of Eden.” I said to myself, “Wow, I didn’t know it was possible to give a performance this good.”
PITT: Although you were extraordinaryon “Growing Pains.”
DICAPRIO: Thank you, buddy. As were you.

Leo, didn’t you get thrown off the set of “Romper Room”?
DICAPRIO: Yeah, when I was 3 years old. I ran up to the camera and started shaking it, saying, “Look at me!”

Dustin Hoffman famously asked Laurence Olivier once what acting was all about, and Olivier replied, “Look at me, look at me, look at me.”
MIRREN: I hate being looked at.
BLANCHETT: I think it’s probably “Look into me.” What we perceive to be naturalism or realism has been utterly eroded by so-called reality television, where people are performing themselves. But what we do, actually, is unmask and reveal what it means to be human, and allow someone in. It’s taken me a long time to allow myself to be exposed in front of a camera.
PITT: Acting is really a team sport. A lot of times one actor will become the MVP, but just like in tennis, your game is elevated if you’re playing with someone better. I mean, just look at the way Cate compensated for George Clooney in “The Good German.” [Laughter]

Are there roles that you look at and think, “I wish I could have played that”?
DICAPRIO: Tons. Burt Lancaster in “Sweet Smell of Success.” De Niro in “Taxi Driver.”
CRUZ: Either of the two women in “Terms of Endearment.” Carmen Maura in “Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown.” Shirley MacLaine in “The Apartment.”
BLANCHETT: Anything Elizabeth Taylor has ever done.
MIRREN: It’s not that you want to play the role; you’re inspired by it. It’s not as if you’re sitting there going, “Oh, I would have been better.” [Pause] Well, sometimes you are. [Laughter]
BLANCHETT: There’s a moment in “A Streetcar Named Desire,” where Vivien Leigh has just gone into the bathroom, and Marlon Brando’s banging on the door, and she opens the door and his hand flinches. It’s the most astonishing shot. This guy that Brando could have played with complete brutality, and [instead he shows] his vulnerability, in that hand.
DICAPRIO: I wanted to ask everyone something: we all talk about being “in the zone”—becoming our character—but there are so many technical things that happen when you’re making a movie, it’s impossible not to realize that there’s a camera there, and your character has to emote this specific emotion. Those moments where it all disappears, and you’re really speaking as this other person? I’m lucky if that happens more than once on a movie.
PITT: I find alcohol helps. [Laughter]

When you’re watching a movie, are you always aware of the actors’ technique, or can you get lost in it the way we do?
MIRREN: Completely lost.
BLANCHETT: Well, I didn’t get lost in “Battlefield Earth.”

Was there a role you’d wished you’d played that you didn’t?
BLANCHETT: I’ve been lucky in a way. In school I was tall and my sexuality was dubious. I was always playing men. And then my nationality has been dubious, having played Elizabeth I quite early in my film career. So I feel like I got some weird and wonderful choices.
PITT: [To DiCaprio] Our sexuality has been dubious as well. [Laughter]

Would you care to discuss that?
PITT: No, there’s been enough discussion.
BLANCHETT: We have photographs.

Was there a role that caused you more anxiety than others?
BLANCHETT: They all scare me. But I tell myself that anxiety is just misplaced excitement. You’re constantly risking failure, so I never watch the films I’m in. That way, I always feel like, “OK, that worked.” I had an experience on “Babel” which I’ve never had shooting a film. I thought, “God, that was a really great take.” And then I saw the film, and the whole scene was played on Brad. [Laughter]

Helen, do you know what Queen Elizabeth thinks of your portrayal of her?
MIRREN: Of course I don’t.

Has she seen it?
MIRREN: I’m sure. Who could resist? Someone who is very close to the queen, a great historian named Robert Lacey, said he thinks she would have said, as the credits rolled, “That wasn’t too bad, was it? I think I’ll have a gin and tonic.”
PITT: How did you start shaping her? She’s got this great fireplug walk, and your glasses were always halfway down the bridge of your nose.
MIRREN: Obviously there’s a lot of film on her, but it’s of her in her formal role—hardly anything behind closed doors. Playing a real character, you have to behave likea detective and see things that maybe no one else has. She’s unbelievably composed, but on the films I noticed that her thumb is always turning her wedding ring round and round and round. There’s this inner beat, this tension.

When you’re creating a character, do you need to find something external like that? Penelope, in “Volver”—
CRUZ: I know what you’re going to ask.

You wore a padded butt for your role.
MIRREN: I had a padded butt in “The Queen,” as well. It wasn’t just Penelope.
CRUZ: Oh, I’m so happy! Now every time someone asks me this, I’m going to say, “Helen had one, too.”

Did the butt help?
CRUZ: Completely. Pedro and I didn’t talk about it. Maybe a one-minute conversation. It just made me work in a different way, move in a different way. It was like finding the right shoes for the character.

You’ve all done some impressive accent work in your careers. Cate has done three different ones this year. Is it a hurdle to get over when you’re building a character?
WHITAKER: Accents help me figure out how to move, how to gesture. I think sometimes when an actor’s accent doesn’t work, it’s because it isn’t connected to the body.
MIRREN: Until you nail the accent it is paralyzing. You can’t act—you can’t do anything—because all you can hear is your voice making the wrong sound. What’s even more difficult is what Penelope has done. I think to act in a foreign language is the most unbelievably difficult thing. I can’t imagine it.

Penelope, your first English-language film was “The Hi-Lo Country.” Was that scary?
CRUZ: Oh, so scary. I didn’t understand a word [director] Stephen Frears was saying. He’s very sweet, but he has a very strong accent, and I only knew my dialogue for the character. I was always going to the bathroom to cry and coming back and trying to hide it.

Brad, your Irish Gypsy accent in Guy Ritchie’s “Snatch” is so great that we can’t understand a word you’re saying.
PITT: That was last-minute, night-before, full-panic mode. I kept trying to get the dialect—I probably started a little late—and it was just too stiff. I went to Guy the day before and said, “You’ve got to do this part. I can’t do it.” And he’s, like, “Yeah. Right.” But it occurred to me that the genius of what Benicio Del Toro had done in “The Usual Suspects” was that you couldn’t understand what he was saying a lot of times. So about midnight, I started walking around the North End of London, working on it and working on it, and it just kept getting more and more indecipherable. Thank God it worked.
BLANCHETT: I never think of accents as something that’s slapped on. It’s syntax and rhythm and breath. It’s about when people choose to pause, what words they emphasize. You can say it’s accent, but it’s actually thought process. It’s got to be organic. And I think the earlier you can start the better.

Brad. [He mimics being stabbed in the heart.]

MIRREN: You’re absolutely right. It’s not something that you glom on the top, as if language and accent are separate. Americans are always saying, “Oh, I love your accent.” I don’t have the bloody accent. You’ve got the accent. [Laughter] No, I never say that. I say, “Thank you so much. How sweet of you.”

Do you feel differently about your work than you did when you started acting?
PITT: When I started I had this idea that the films I did defined me, and that my life would be interesting based on the characters I’d chosen. I don’t feel that way anymore. I’m a father now. There are other things that are important to me. I was chasing something that wasn’t fulfilling. I caught myself on the phone the other day—Leo has been playing some real strong men these last few years—and I found myself saying, “I want to play more of a man.” I got off the phone and I thought, “No. Live like a man, and the movies will follow.”
WHITAKER: I had to learn to not divorce my life from my work. My work is a continual process of growth for me; it’s an expansion of myself. In the last couple of years, I’ve been taking things I learn about myself in my work and using it to be more completely there for my kids, my family, my friends. It’s flowing in a complete way. It has been a bit of an awakening.
DICAPRIO: Man, I’ve got to get some kids, huh? I only really started enjoying acting when there was a certain level of detachment from the end result. I remember being 15 and going on 160 auditions, and not getting a single role for a year and a half. I realized I was turning into one of those Hollywood kids: “Hi, I’m Leo! And I’m going to be reading today! Oh yeah, I had a great day at school! I love school!” [Laughter] I had become a product of this system where everyone is aiming to please the director, the casting director, whomever. So I started to think about the character—the work—instead of the result. You know, kids are always asking me what they should do to become actors. You give them the pat answers: “Study your lines. Work hard. Don’t give up.” But what I want to tell them is, “You have to not care what these people think about you.”
MIRREN: You were lucky to learn that at 15. Marlon Brando’s great acting advice was, “Don’t care too much.” I never understood that, because I cared so much, and still do. But what he meant was, let go of that total investment in “Are they going to love me?” “Am I going to be good?” F—- that. Maybe that’s what Brad is saying as well.
PITT: Yeah, but it took me 800 words to say what he did in four.

You’re all rich. You’re all famous. You’ve all received critical acclaim. Why work? Why keep acting?
DICAPRIO: I love it. There’s no other art form in the world that affects me more. There’s nothing that I walk away from feeling transformed by the way I do with cinema. There’s something so gratifying about being burned into celluloid and knowing that I can look back later in life and have stories about those experiences. It’s an amazing gift.
WHITAKER: It’s magic. Who wouldn’t want to be a part of that?
CRUZ: It gives me so much happiness to know that I will never know everything about acting. That fear of not knowing will always be with me, no matter what happens.
PITT: It’s the love for the story, and a respect for the business. I want to be better in it, and better for it. I’m still striving for that. And I believe in the power of films.
BLANCHETT: Krzysztof Kieslowski said that filmmaking is a conversation with an audience. When you’re connecting with other people, it’s utterly thrilling. I feel alive when I’m acting. It’s tragic, but true. I would die in a rehearsal room if I could.

Helen, what keeps you acting?
MIRREN: Money. [Laughter] And it’s incredibly good fun. Of course, there are some intense artistic reasons, but I’m not going to go into them. So, yeah, fun and money.

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Steven Tyler: Aerosmith is not breaking up - Dlisted
  • Ashley Tisdale rocks red lips - JustJaredJr
  • Sharon Osbourne apologies to Susan Boyle - PopEater
  • More from Justin Timberlake on the Social Network set - PopSugar
  • Amy Winehouse shows off her new self - TheSuperficial
  • Meryl Streep rules New York City - LaineyGossip
  • Taylor Swift covers InStyle in 3-D! - Celebuzz
Photo: Andres Otero/WENN

1,036 Comments

Pages: « 125 26 27 [28] 29 30 3142 » Show All

“BEST STUFF IN THE WORLD!”

Do you know this site?
http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/

Look at AJ’s titles…

Angelina Jolie

The Best Actress
The Best Goodwill Ambassador
The Best Most Beautiful Hollywood Starlet
The Best Celebrity
The Best Looking Woman In The Whole World,
The Best Sex Symbol
The Best Person Ever
The Best Hair
The Best Lips
The Best Idol
The Best Smile
The Best Breasts
The Best Sexiest Mother
The Best Reason To Become a Lesbian
The Best Eyes
The Best Laugh
The Best Left-Handed Celebrity
The Best 90’s Icon
The Best Female Role Model
The Best Secret Agent Woman,
The Best Body
The Best Freckles
The Best Female Action Star
The Best Facial Expressions

:)

TO THE FANS @ 01/22/2007 at 2:30 pm

Honestly the Jolie-Pitt fans on this site just never learn from their mistakes. People have been pleading with you to ignore the hate and concentrate on the positive stuff (of which there are many) about this beautiful family but you guys just never seen to be able to let it go.

You get too emotional letting things that could have passed turn into a big deal and I’m sorry to say this but the article making its way to perez was because of the reaction it received here.

Blaming Brad is not the answer either after all it was not him that gave the interview it was Angie and her true fans know what she is like and what she was trying to say, it only the haters that will put the negative spin on her words. But I do see you point of view that her life was a lot easier without Brad but even you (Angie fans wanting her to leave Brad) have to admit that they love each other, I truly believe they are happy.

COME ON FANS PLS STOP GETTING SO UPSET BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT MAKES THINGS WORST.

SHE WAS NEVER A MEDIA DARLING WAS SHE, SHE HAS ALWAYS BEEN PICKED APART AND COME OUT STRONGER SO I KNOW IN MY HEART THAT SHE WILL BE FINE. THE WILL FIND A NEW VILLAIN SOON ENOUGH.

Angelina Jolie is one of America’s strengths and she makes America proud no matter what others say. While she was in an important meeting with the IFC to help with the economic recovery in Cambodia, Ryan Seacrest and Caryn James were on a path of bashing her and that makes them America’s shame.

Enough with the NYT. Let’s talk about Oscars nominations.

According to The Envelope, Brad has a good chance to get nominated tomorrow. Here is his take:

Confusion reigns over the candidacy of DiCaprio, who was submitted to the SAG awards by Warner Bros. in the supporting category for “The Departed” and in lead for “Blood Diamond.” Now support for his role in “Blood Diamond” has waned and many believe he can win the lead-acting prize if voters promote him to the top race at the Oscars for “Departed,” the frontrunner for best picture.

The academy doesn’t have an eligibility committee like the Golden Globes, which placed DiCaprio in lead for both “Departed” and “Blood Diamond,” thus contributing to the star’s category confusion. At the Oscars, voters can put an actor in either race and usually look for guidance from the “For Your Consideration” ads run by the studios. Unlike the Globes, actors may only be nominated once per Oscar category.

“Voters are confused by his campaign, or lack of it, over being specific,” says Hammond.

The trade ads for “Departed” group DiCaprio with Jack Nicholson, Matt Damon and Mark Wahlberg under a heading for “The Actors,” even though it’s clear that Wahlberg is considered a supporting player. Possibly Nicholson and Damon, too.

Confusion also surrounds where to nominate Brad Pitt for “Babel.” While trade ads target him for supporting, voters might promote him to lead based upon his placement in the reminder list sent to academy members, which features movies alphabetically and lists their stars according to the way they appear in a film’s final credits. At the end of “Babel,” when the credits roll, Pitt gets top billing.

Osborne believes that Pitt has a strong chance to be nominated for lead. He was nominated in the supporting slot at the Globes, but was snubbed by SAG, which only agreed with the Globes on one nominee: Eddie Murphy (”Dreamgirls”).

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Aside from the DiCaprio and Pitt question marks, there are lots of candidates in the running. Sure bets seem to be Murphy and Alan Arkin (”Little Miss Sunshine”).

Other contenders are Nicholson and Wahlberg, Michael Sheen (”The Queen”), Jackie Earle Haley (”Little Children”), Michael Caine (”Children of Men”) and Djimon Hounsou (”Blood Diamond”).

Alec Baldwin and Martin Sheen are the only actors from “The Departed” that have been firmly promoted as supporting candidates.

Angelina’s Visit in Vietnam is now being carried by some 43 news agencies.

Spread the word. Probably Jared may put up a thread for the this.

Angelina Jolie visits Vietnam
22 January 2007
Hollywood actress Angelina Jolie is paying a visit to Vietnam in order to promote her charity.

The star travelled to the Asian country for a meeting on behalf of the Maddox Jolie-Pitt Project, which generates funds for Jolie’s son’s native country Cambodia.

Jolie met with financial bigwigs in order to establish a number of projects including one which will help farmers to grow and sell bamboo.

The star’s visit to Vietnam comes as she and Brad Pitt are moving home to New Orleans.

The celebrity couple, along with children Maddox, Zahara and Shiloh, have bought a $3.5m (£1.77m), six-bedroom house.

Vietnam borders Cambodia to the south-west, with China to the north and Laos to the north-west.

The country is one of the most densely populated in south-east Asia, with a population of 85m and is popular among tourists for its outstanding natural beauty, including Ha Long Bay, a natural heritage site.

Relax & Breathe @ 01/22/2007 at 2:33 pm

661
Rollin my eyes Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 2:02 pm
http://i3.tinypic.com/2cgng9i.jpg

loves it!

And there are sooo many like it on the red carpet floating around. Eyewitnesses have posted on fansites exactly how they were, as only fans can do, not snarky reporters. It’s all the same…the photos of them don’t do them justice. In real life they are stunningly beautiful and Zen like. What a great couple they make. Brad seems to have revived energy in his personal & professional life.

It’s funny, since they have been around for quite a while, they both must be amused and a little annoyed at all this constant attention on them. They are probably like “what, again”? Is there no one else to talk about? These two have been around the block in the film industry and are not exactly new. Even their coupling isn’t new. What are we going on now….2 or 3 years? That’s old news. LOL!!!!

I think if they were both just starting out in the biz, they would be caught all up in the frenzy and adjusting their lives to suit others opinions. The fact that Brad & Angelina are established actors help them keep a balanced view of their industry, pro & con. I’m sure their children help put everything in perspective. I love the idea put forward by someone on here that suggested his leaving the interview was because it was a call from a family member.

Mama Angelina & Papa Brad’s priorities in life have changed. Hollywood has to acknowledge & respect this.

Cliniqua, Dump Truck has his crappy show on NBC and they hosted the GGs. In addition, the next day he had his self-indulgent star on the walk of fame photo op with his ticking clock current family.

I tend to agree that perhaps the head of steam is coming from the x’s team. After all, they and their friends are greasing all the entertainment types, shows you how far the X has fallen….can we say D list?

Cliniqua, Dump Truck has his crappy show on NBC and they hosted the GGs. In addition, the next day he had his self-indulgent star on the walk of fame photo op with his ticking clock current family. I don’t think he would put effort into Angelina, after all he has Barbara Walters to get back yet.

I tend to agree that perhaps the head of steam is coming from the x’s team. After all, they and their friends are greasing all the entertainment types, shows you how far the X has fallen….can we say D list?

Dear Brangelina-Fan

Thanks to the link

http://brangelinafans.blogspot.com/2007/01/ok-its-on.html

And here my answer let’s join them!

Thank you for writing the letter to Caryn James. I was also very annoyed about it and I am honestly not used to write blogs. But I wish that something must be done and it is necessary to stop certain people who misuse Angelina for selling their headlines (tabloids’ journalists) and others misuse her for their personal trash (bad-mouth gossipers). I consider it as a kind of modern whitch-tracing and am horrified how the mass media (including New York Times) joins in stirring up hatred against a person who tries to do good things and just wants to live in peace.
I fully support you in your letter and I hope many other would join you.
Kindest
another brangelina-fan

671
Isabelle II Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 2:22 pm
653
CLINIQUA
=========
Kat Williams video, soooo true! Like your mama used to say, the’re just jealous.
They were dogging Angelina a LOT worse 2 yrs ago. Getting through this **** is like dipping cherries

*********************************************

ITA. It was worse during the BBT years OY! He was so much older than her you’d think he would be a kind of role model or mentor & teach her about things but no. It was Angelina who grew on her own during Tomb Raider but BBT still thought he was some punk teenager and stayed the same.

Angelina Jolie is one of America’s strengths and makes America proud with her altruism. While she was in an important meeting with the IFC to help with the economic recovery in Cambodia, Ryan Seacrest and Caryn James were on a path to bash her and that makes them America’s shame.

Angelina Jolie Makes a Surprise Visit to Cambodia
WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 22, 2006 12:30 PM EST

By Tim Nudd

Angelina Jolie

Angelina Jolie, whose son Maddox is Cambodian, on Tuesday made an unannounced visit to the country, where she is involved in conservation efforts.

Jolie, who had been filming A Mighty Heart in India, paid a brief visit to the Pailin area of northwestern Cambodia, the Associated Press reports.

She was there to meet with officials to discuss a forest conservation project for which she has promised some $1.3 million over five years.

Kong Duong, the head of Pailin information office, said the actress and her party flew in on two helicopters and stayed very briefly before flying out.

Jolie, 31, has also supported Adopt-A-Minefield’s efforts in Cambodia and met with refugees there as part of her role as a United Nations Goodwill Ambassador.

She adopted Maddox, who is now 5, after filming Lara Croft: Tombraider in the country.

first and last post @ 01/22/2007 at 2:48 pm

Re: 655 Frenchy Says: January 22nd, 2007 at 1:48 pm and others
“…why is this sexist Caryn Jayson Blair reporting news third hand? It’s not an op-ed piece so why isn’t she reporting things first hand like an “authentic” reporter? Aren’t you supposed to put your personal opinions aside when doing a story and just report the FACTS?”

Caryn James is a critic for NYT arts and leisure section and editor of the NYT book review. She’s an armchair writer who never gets out of her chair and values the byline credit more than the facts.

I guess JJ is now one stop shop for everything Jolie-Pitt. Have we created a monster?
++++++++++++++++++++++
Yes, it’s true. It would be easier if it was a private forum, so you can ban the haters and control the lurkers but since this is a open forum we should try to stay positive. Also we should not forget to support with good feedback the media that usually carries the good news, like People magazine. They usually print the feedback from the main stories, so lets start with that.

#
673
THANKS Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 2:22 pm

“After logging visits to more than 20 countries, Angelina is one of the busiest goodwill ambassadors in UN history. And her charity isn’t limited to face time; she has donated millions of dollars to various causes around the globe.”
+++++++++
It’s always interesting to see how petty people try to bring down those who are much greater than them. They are the ones to be pitied.

When do they announce the Oscar nominations?

Thank you #498 for your nice remarks. I agree with you 100%. As for Angelina’s critics on the bad side. They are a bunch of jealous people(I bit majority of them are women), because Angelina is the epitome of what they want in their lives and can’t have it, so they ranting and venting around through their “suspect” journalist ability to discredit her. But, it won’t work, we know better.

crosseyed for Brad @ 01/22/2007 at 2:58 pm

677
bluemoon Says:

January 22nd, 2007 at 2:32 pm
_____________________________________________________________________

I’m crossing my fingers, toes & eyes for Brad tomorrow. That story about some wanting to put Leo in for Supporting for The Departed all of a sudden got me scared. You know what’s messing up this supporting category? It’s the possibility of Jack Nicholson. He’s the aging bad boy that the Academy loves.

Knock them down to build them back up, but angie ain’t playing that game. If they knock her down she won’t even be aware of it, she is too busy living her life and trying to help the world a little. She’ not trying to SAVE the world she’s just doing her part and helping out the best she can .

I’ve just been visiting a site where they call BP… TLBITKU.

Now, who can guess what TLBITKU means? It has something to do with AJ… well, everything really.

I’ll give you all five minutes…

(no googling allowed)

:)

new year luv. @ 01/22/2007 at 3:07 pm

I’m proposing for Angelina haters to wear a badge…. and maybe a blue Donald Duck hat. They’re invading blogs after blogs, and whenever possible used an uglified photoshopped icon of Angelina Jolie. They’re so vocal and proud of their hate of Jolie, they want everyone to know they hate her, from deep inside their wretched mind and soul. Even though they’re not fan, they would flock all the blogs about her, just to say she’s so boring bla bla bla. They write more about her than Angelina Jolie fans itself. So why don’t they just wear a badge and maybe organize a parade with balloons and confettis? A few weeks ago someone in NYT wrote something about ‘Misery chic’ in Hollywood, about how everyone suddenly involved in charity because of Angelina Jolie. I think it’s not so much about misery chic anymore, it’s more of ‘hate Angelina Jolie chic’ in the world of journalism. It’s such a trend to hate Angelina, every writers did it to gain fame, since no one would notice their writing unless they mention Angelina in their column. Anyone agree?

gussie dont bring negatives here

to 695
I do agree with you. As I don’t live in the US, I wouldn’t have known who the hell is Ryan nor Caryn James, and I don’t watch “Friends” either, as I find them a bit boring (sorry Friends-fan), so I even didn’t know who this David Arquette is… until they uttered something stupid that however is related to Angie, mostly not in a positive way. In fact they all profit from their own nonsense.

Don’t care about you Gussie, i won’t even read your ’solution’.

694
Gussie Says:
January 22nd, 2007 at 3:05 pm

I’ve just been visiting a site where they call BP… TLBITKU.

Now, who can guess what TLBITKU means? It has something to do with AJ… well, everything really.

I’ll give you all five minutes…

(no googling allowed)

:)

***************

The
Luckiest
B astard
In
The
Known
Universe

:lol:
Delicious, isn’t it?

CNN says Brad is a shoo in for a BSA nom

Best supporting actor

Shoo-ins: Eddie Murphy (”Dreamgirls”), Jack Nicholson (”The Departed”), Brad Pitt (”Babel”), Michael Sheen (”The Queen”)

On the bubble: Alan Arkin (”Little Miss Sunshine”), Jackie Earle Haley (”Little Children”), Mark Wahlberg (”The Departed”)

Deserves it but doesn’t stand a chance: Ben Affleck (”Hollywoodland”), Adam Beach (”Flags of Our Fathers”), Michael Caine (”Children of Men”), Ken Davitian (”Borat”), Danny Huston (”The Proposition”)

For good or ill, it was impossible to ignore Jack Nicholson in “The Departed,” and a nomination is in the bag for one of Oscar’s most loyal attendants. Brad Pitt and Eddie Murphy showed us something new this year, and will reap the rewards. After that it gets tricky: a pedophile? A homophobic drug-taking grandpa? Or Mark Wahlberg’s exercise in creative profanity? It would be nice if enough members widened the net to show some respect to Ben Affleck for “Hollywoodland” (and his costar Diane Lane, for that matter), but my hunch is Wahlberg will get the nod.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/Movies/01/22/oscar.preview/index.html

Pages: « 125 26 27 [28] 29 30 3142 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.