Brad Pitt to Paparazzi: “You Guys are Unbelievable”

Tue, 30 January 2007 at 6:44 am

Brad Pitt was spotted leaving an office in West Hollywood, Calif late last night for a business meeting, reportedly. He was seen carrying a copy of a the Ron Hansen book, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (one of Brad’s new films that wrapped up last year and due out later this year). Brad, for obvious reasons, wasn’t very welcoming of the horde of paparazzi that swarmed around him as he hopped into his car. Before leaving, Brad addressed the paparazzi saying, “You guys are unbelievable.”

Other pictures include Brad and Angelina Jolie driving around L.A. earlier in the day. Also included is one scan of Brad Pitt in the table of contents of this week’s Entertainment Weekly.

Brad Pitt calls paparazzi “unbelievable” [via FlynetOnline]

Posted to: Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt
Related posts:

762 Comments

Pages: « 1 … 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 … 26 » Show All

# 631

truth @ 01/31/2007 at 12:54 am

Patti, people here said they don’t want her mentioned, I think that about says it all.

# 632

curly @ 01/31/2007 at 12:55 am

625
kearnie Says:

Kearnie, I owe everything I know to not having a TV, conscious choice. All the rest, including what I do for a living, is –as Herodotus would put– “As fate has it…”

627
ntt Says:

It is similar in my native country as well, especially for TV. People who complained thought they were the minority, because the outlets consistently bombarded with the same motto “people watch it, so they demand it, and we give what they want.” One day a hotline collecting complaints was opened. A couple of months later, it turned out that majority of complaints was about indecency in programs. Finally, there came a regulation and it got better. It turns out the outlets which disseminate the information (pictures, programs, providing the captions) can set the rules for their paps, and following the regulation they did.

fyi:

I am checking out for the night. If you wish, we can continue the conversation later.

~curly

# 633

ATTENTION @ 01/31/2007 at 12:58 am

Ignore Patti and anyone who brings up ja. their plan is to turn this into a brangie vs aniston thread. the triangle crap is OFFICIALLY over now and some cant stand it.

# 634

[Fug Face Maniston] @ 01/31/2007 at 1:03 am

I am shocked and amazed at the vile spew of disgusting hate that is being said to me and about me. I cant believe the pure hatred people can have in their hearts . I’m so hurt and appalled at those comments. this is suppose to be a positive thread of mourning!

I come on this site everyday like all of you, I voice [type] my opinion on different topics like every body does. And I have never, ever said anything thing mean to anyone on. And I’m ashamed,astonished, baffled, bewildered, and flabbergasted. I haven’t stopped crying since I read those mean, rude, bad, hurtful, depressing, malicious vulgar comments. I think this might be my last night on this site. I cant believe people can be so mean to a fellow Brangelina Fan.

# 635

BCBG @ 01/31/2007 at 1:03 am

629
Patti Says:
__________________

The Jen fans are the one who are trouble-makers. I can tell by the way they wrote. Can you honestly tell me the majority of the hate posts are not from those rabid Jen fans? You mean none of them???? Are you that naive?

Convince me they are not.

# 636

ATTENTION @ 01/31/2007 at 1:06 am

see fug face just needed some attention. [Lmao]

# 637

ntt @ 01/31/2007 at 1:13 am

635
BCBG Says:

January 31st, 2007 at 1:03 am
==================

Just ignore them. Please don’t bring the name here.

# 638

Lurker Alert!! @ 01/31/2007 at 1:13 am

#634 [Fug Face Maniston]

have a good trip!!

# 639

please have love @ 01/31/2007 at 1:14 am

to all haters -

I can not believe that even during this time you haters can’t put aside your hatred and have compassion for another human being

# 640

new year luv. @ 01/31/2007 at 1:31 am

634
[Fug Face Maniston] Says:

January 31st, 2007 at 1:03 am
—————-
I’m sure you have waited a long time after posting “LMAO” repeatedly to say that.

LMAO!!!!

# 641

Ednonymous @ 01/31/2007 at 1:40 am

He went out and got himself famous… he hangs his shorts with someone famous and he has famously gone out of his way to publicize his ‘private’ life.
Tough titties for him! He’s the one who did this to himself. If he doesn’t like it, he can quit the movies and live like a normal human being… goodness knows he doesnt’ need the money.
The only thing he’s pissed off at is the realization that he’s getting close to Angelina’s boredome limit with men… She’s due for a replacement soon.

# 642

mary lou @ 01/31/2007 at 1:44 am

634
[Fug Face Maniston] I cant believe people can be so mean to a fellow Brangelina Fan.
********************************************************************yyour name is mean ans uncalled for also..Jennifer is human to. u r mean

# 643

ALISTER @ 01/31/2007 at 1:44 am

Odd Patti is not a fan of Brad & Angelina & evertime there’s a thread about the couple Patti will leave her posts as usual. I know it is a free blog but if you do not like & you hate someone will you go there & post? You are just torturing yourself.

I for one do not like Aniston. In fact, I hate her but I neither post on her thread nor read the comments. It’s just a waste of my time. I will not give Aniston my precious moments…that is reserved only to my family, friends & of course the Jolie-Pitts.

Lastly, on behalf of the BAMZS fans thanks for your condolences Patti. God Bless all.

# 644

Ed d'witch @ 01/31/2007 at 1:49 am

I guess Ed (or should I say Edwina) is back again in her own self. Ednonymous..is that your new monicker now moron? When will Anuston will replace Vince? Or could it be she not getting sick with threesome with the Cox-Arquettes.

# 645

EdwinASS @ 01/31/2007 at 1:52 am

Your 15 minutes of fame is up Ed. We remember all you too well. Pissed off too ‘cuz you are not famous & rich as Brad. Jealous much?

# 646

LMAO!!! @ 01/31/2007 at 1:54 am

He went out and got himself famous… he hangs his shorts with someone
famous…..hahahahahahahahahahah …ROTFLMAO… what a gifted writer.

# 647

()()()() @ 01/31/2007 at 1:59 am

Anyone noticed that Jennifer Aniston only visited her Dad when he got a heart attack? She’s a millionaire & will not spare her millions to her Mother…I heard she reconciled with her Mom ( for publicity) . Where is her Mother now?

How childish Aniston can be…she got upset with her Mom for making criticism about her looks? How shallow can she be. Gosh, no wonder she can only attract shallow & degenerate fans like herself. Pity? Not in a million years.

# 648

Lurker Alert!! @ 01/31/2007 at 2:06 am

I see it’s the cuckoo hour… watch your back BAMZS!!
the freaks come out at night!!

I’m Out!!!!!!!!

# 649

hey hey @ 01/31/2007 at 2:08 am

I’m so shallow, but looking at Braddy’s pictures still send me into quiveration. He is such a good-looking man, despite sorrow and grief, coupled with exasperation.

# 650

ntt @ 01/31/2007 at 2:09 am

Please stop bringing JA to this thread. Don’t perpetuate the triangle. You guys criticize people for bashing AJ when her mom was dying, but just consider for a moment. What if JA’s dad is very sick at this moment, and she is with him, and you are here bashing her. Go ahead and do what you want, but I would rather not have that on my conscience.

# 651

CLINIQUA @ 01/31/2007 at 2:33 am

633
ATTENTION Says:

January 31st, 2007 at 12:58 am
Ignore Patti and anyone who brings up ja. their plan is to turn this into a brangie vs aniston thread. the triangle **** is OFFICIALLY over now and some cant stand it.

———————————

The irony is, there was never REALLY a triangle. That was just a PR plan hatched by ‘Huvaniston.’ A true ‘triangle,’ implies the 3 people are somehow involved with each other, when the reality is Brad & Angelina have NOTHING to do with Maniston. It’s only the rags that fictitiously lump them together.

changing gears….

Lastly, Ednonimous, or is it Jen? Or is it one of her fat fug goddesses? Or is it one of Huvane’s homely assistants?? All I have to say to YOU is, no one has EVER accused Angelina of falling out of love with her partners - she’s never been accused of being fickle…as a matter of fact, she’s been as intense as they come, until she realized that intensity wasn’t shared. With Brad, who is the same type of man, as she is a woman - she won’t have to worry about that. It’s my opinion that they are that rare couple whose love only grows deeper, more soulful and more meaningful with time. They will always YEARN to BELONG to each other. You can feel it.

Which is why they drive you to such hateful, bat-sh*t crazy rantings….

As for the few guys Angie’s had serious relationships with - she’s on the low end of the scale in Hollywood terms. There aren’t even enough men that have been in her life that the press knows about that you can even say she’s been a love ‘em and leave ‘em type with. In one case hers was a teen marriage, and in the other BBT was a flaky ******* who freaked out when she brought Mad home - so how you’re saying SHE is the fickle one is beyond me.

This is not a woman that has 50 notches in her belt, and OF COURSE, you know that - it probably drives you fans of the VERIFIED *WH*RE* aka Chin ‘I shave my pubes myself while lying upside down on the Casting Couch’ Maniston, CRAZY!

*(See smokinggun.com, where the early writers of ‘Friends,’ said Maniston could be f*cked, for a beefy script and a diet coke. Poor Brad, his rebound from Fishsticks Paltry was not exactly the ‘girl next door,’ more like the ‘ho’ next door.)

I say all this to say….

…you could just as easily say that about J.Lo (3rd marriage), Drew Barrymore (3rd marriage), Britney Spears (3rd marriage..whoever that ‘next’ guy will be…), if Jen Garner and Ben Affleck don’t work out…she’ll be on HER 3rd marriage. If Nicole and Keith Urban don’t work out (3rd marriage), Melanie Griffith will be on #4 if she and Antonio go bust, #5 if you’re counting Don Johnson two times. Madonna’s on her 3rd if she and Guy ever go bust. Cameron Diaz is a serial ‘girlfriend’ each relationship lasting 4 years (Matt Dillon, Jared Leto, and Justin Timberlake) - and YET….

….oddly enough, somehow I think Mr.Ednonimous (aka Jen aka fat fug goddesses aka Huvaniston’s henchwomen), reserve all the trash talk solely for Angelina’s love life, and give other celebs a pass, even though statistically, she’s slept with and been with a whole h*lluva lot fewer guys than the gals I just named, and when it comes to Maniston, it’s well known among EVERYONE that she outnumbers Angelina to the 10th power in that department.

Brad knows it too, it’s just that he’s a kind of renaissance man when it comes to that stuff….

You’d have to be to marry a woman who blew you on the first date.

Hey, it was early days, he didn’t mind the paper cuts on his johnson made by her paper thin lips…plus he was, as everyone knows still despondent and convinced the fairy tale didn’t exist. It wasn’t until late 2003, that he began to believe again.

…and the rest, as they say…is history, the present…and the future….

Viva LA BAMZS!!

Ciao.

# 652

AddictedtoBAMZs @ 01/31/2007 at 2:48 am

Meli, #410, I truly hope for your sake your comment was made out of ignorance. It disgusted me as no other ever has. I hope you are not a citizen of this great country. That would be an excuse for your complete lack of regard for A Soldier’s Wife. Meli, to quote a great bumber sticker: Freedom Isn’t Free.

# 653

ntt @ 01/31/2007 at 3:02 am

I am watching Nightline. They are talking about a school in NYC teaching foreign languages (French, Spanish, Chinese, Italian) to 6 month old babies. They learn all those languages at the same time. I am curious to see how it turns out.

# 654

new year luv. @ 01/31/2007 at 3:43 am

652
ntt Says:

January 31st, 2007 at 3:02 am
————-
Basically they will never remember the language to the deepest core. My friend is Singaporean and she was taught three languages since baby: Indonesian, Chinese, and English, and she never master each languages. She is not the only one either, my cousins half Japanese half indonesian with their parents fluent in German, Now they speak mostly gibberish as well. Unless they did it to genius babies with really high IQs, It’s pretty cruel to the babies.

# 655

NaNa @ 01/31/2007 at 3:47 am

ntt,

It is very interesting story.
I think the babies will be confused, do not know the boundaries and will mix the languages. I think 6 months old is too young to catch and differentiate.

# 656

black @ 01/31/2007 at 3:57 am

He kinda reminds me of James Dean here………hmm…….

He looks cool as ever- the paps suck as always.

# 657

+++ @ 01/31/2007 at 4:02 am

650
CLINIQUA Says:

January 31st, 2007 at 2:33 am

OMG. always so funny and eloquent. I adore you !

# 658

realme @ 01/31/2007 at 4:03 am

she looks ok and her mother die a few dats, angelina is a #$$%% i hate her

# 659

stranger @ 01/31/2007 at 4:23 am

652
ntt Says:
January 31st, 2007 at 3:02 am

I grew up bilingual and then became trilingual at the age of ten. I have learnt a couple more languages along the way and the more languages you learn, the easier it is to learn a new one. And the younger you start, the higher are your chances of mastering any language to the level of a native speaker, But there is a catch.

This is only possible if the children are schooled in all the languages - not just getting language courses, other subjects like math or history must be taught in those languages and they also need contact with native speakers their own age - only then can they learn these langs. as they grow up.

But yje most common scenario is: one language at home and another at school, usually the schools are not prepared to deal with the specific needs of bilinguals or trilinguals. Then you have end up with a complete disaster.

# 660

stranger @ 01/31/2007 at 4:36 am

Sorry, it’s late and I’m typing too fast.
The last sentence should be: Then you end up with a complete disaster.

LOL, and I’m talking about mastering languages…

Anyway, babies are like a blank page, the older you get your brain stops making unnecessary distinctions. So, let’s take the case of a Japanese baby in Japan; the baby can distinguish the difference in sound of “r” and “l”, but as s/he grows, the brain stops making the distinction because it is not needed in Japanese, And since babies do not discriminate sounds like older kids, they can learn to keep making distinctions a monolingual wouldn’t.
And as we get older it gets harder to learn a foreign language because our brain has stopped making unnecessary distinctions of sounds and syntactc patterns - the synaptic connections that are not used get “pruned” so to speak.

Pages: « 1 … 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 … 26 » Show All

Comment and Share!