Aniston Debuts Short Film at Santa Barbara

jen’s fans crawl out at night. creepy jen and her creepy fans. LAURA, i’d see that you working at a psycho hospital the CRAZINESS and thinking abilities has carried over to your brain. CRAZY and LOONIES! who can blame you for getting CRAZY and LOONIES cuz after all, most of the people you work with at the hospital are CRAZY!

i believe that at one point or another we don’t know what we want or the direction to take during our youth and some at a later time in life, including yourself. don’t sit there telling me that you’ve always had your head straight in life cuz that’s bs’ing and will make you a LIAR just like your AMERICA SWEETHEART! angie went through that stage at her early age and was confused and there was nothing for her to get her busy, other than parties and become wild. i don’t need to go farther on angie. just look at the young celebrities like paris, lindsay, nicole and etc….they’ve grown up in the public eyes and are already rich. when they already have of that and nothing to fight for to appreciate life, what to do with their money and time, other than to party. think about it, if anything you’re the PSYCHO and only think and see what is in the box. it doesn’t take a genius to figure it out. because you work at a PSYCHO place, your theory doesn’t support or suffice anything. if anything, your being critical and judgmental SIMPLY cuz you’re the BIG NOSE and LONG CHIN’s fan.

angie has found happiness and passions in her mid 20’s! her first happiness was MADDOX. MADDOX made her see things that are more important than being wild and a party girl. she saw a sense of direction in him and changed her thinking and life completely. then, her passions, is to help others locally and around the world by becoming a humanitarian. then she met brad and they both have similiar interests and passions! when 2 people have similiar interests and goals and at that stage of their life time, don’t you think it’s time to start a family and that is exactly what brad did with angie “started a family”.

as for jen in her early 40’s what has she done or achieved? she was with brad for 7 years, plenty of time to start a family, but what happened. the only few reasons i can think of is that, she’s too busy on the self-absored, getting attention and more importantly BUSY lying to herself, YOU, her fans and the world. in the end she achieved “nothing” at this stage of life, other than sit there LYING!

543Westwood Says:
_________
It’s more likely the other way around; the existence of the JP’s sends you guys to multiple spasms..come on, admit it, you know you love ‘em.

553:) Says:
February 7th, 2007 at 1:13 am
______

definitely

__ is crazy, you know she has all multiple litle __’s on the side talking to her. LMAO she cant even keep up with her previous & present lies. Face it, you are America’s superficial lying frigid homely girl–> homely? yes, go cry at a corner or announce the world who does not care that you’re hurt due to the homely comment.

http://www.celebrityplasticpics.com/angelinajolie.htm

581
Fabiola Says:
=======================

I’m a total Jen hater, but what’s due is due. Props for providing a link. I stand corrected. Now how hard was that? You could’ve shut us up a long time ago [re: that subject]

580
tiger Says:
———————
if you aren’t a Jen fan, why are you on this thread, so late to the party, defending her? hmmmmmmm?????

WHoever posted the link to this article, thanks! Shows what a manipulative, sorry ass pathetic moron Jen was and IS. Don’t you just love how she cries at the very end?? So she’s a liar, a crybaby, AND delusional. Phew.

——————————————-

“APRIL 1998 - You know you’ve been doing this celebrity shtick too long when you start running into the same stars on different publicity tours and they pretend to remember you.
“That’s right! I remember you!” Jennifer Aniston gushes to me as she sits her perky but approachable self down at a cram-packed interview table in the Beverly Hills Four Seasons. Her compliment comes in response to my casual comment that we last talked in New York, while she was plugging Picture Perfect and shooting The Object of My Affection, the pretty darn good film she is now promoting.

“Oh, come on,” I say gently, not believing her for an instant. She’s accompanied by her boyfriend, Tate Donovan, who silently sits about four feet behind her. He has bad skin and looks too thin.

“No I do!” Aniston insists. She’s wearing almost the same outfit as the last time I talked to her: a too tight tan skirt that nicely accentuates her callipygian asset, a sleeveless blouse (last time white, this time green), no stockings, sandals with heels, lots of makeup but perfectly applied.

“That’s nice of you to say,” I say, keeping a mildly irritated tone out of my voice. She looks great. She makes eye contact. I want to like her.

“But I DO! I DO remember you!” she insists more vociferously this time. Then she makes a big mistake. “I recognize a lot of familiar faces today, like you and you…” she says, pointing at faces around the interview table.

Other writers disagree: “Uh, no,” one says. “I didn’t talk to you in New York,” says another. “I’m a newbie,” says an awed college girl. Strike three.

“Oh,” says Jennifer Aniston, pursing her lips and looking a little chagrined. “But you!” she says, pointing to another writer. “You were in New York, right?”

Strike four. “No,” says the writer. Then, obviously feeling bad, he adds “Sorry.”

“Oh. Oh my,” says Jennifer Aniston. There is silence. The table is uncomfortable. This is quickly turning into a debacle, so I decide to turn it around and talk about good stuff.

“Hey, let’s get this going on a better foot,” I say. “Honestly, I think this is the best movie yet by anybody out of ‘Friends’…”

She looks very relieved. “Wow. That’s wonderful. Thank you.”

“…But do you think there’s going to be that age-old resistance to TV stars trying to get into movies working against this picture, too?” I finish. In the world of delicately phrased inquiries, I have become a master at taking a question that starts out like an ass-kiss and turning it into a spank.

Aniston is totally prepared for the question. “I think that resistance is lessening. I really do. People are realizing that everybody is an actor and just trying to do what they do. I hope it is.” There is a pause in which no one says anything, and she goes on. “If it wasn’t for the show I wouldn’t have the opportunity to do movies, you know. I couldn’t get a reading to do a feature film. Before, I was petrified, too intimidated at the thought of auditioning for a movie. But ‘Friends’ has given all of us an unbelievable trump card.”

This is a fairly honest answer, trying to be optimistic while at the same time giving insight to a young woman who doesn’t sound nearly as confident in herself as she should be considering the circumstances. Somebody asks if it was an intentional touch to keep her hair so casual in the new film – a very un-Rachel ‘do – and Aniston says “Absolutely.”

“Do you think a backlash is inevitable no matter who you are, after fame hits?” I ask.

“That seems to be the course of events,” Aniston responds smoothly. “I remember I was talking to Steven Spielberg, actually, having this exact conversation. I met him once when ‘Friends’ first came on, then about two years later, when the backlash was really kicking in, and he asked me ‘How are you doing with all this?’ and I told him that it was heartbreaking. You don’t expect it. You’re not prepared for it. All you know is you went to do a job…and…And he said, ‘They do that to everybody. It’s all part of it.’ And that was the first time anybody had said that to me. It’s just boredom. They need to stir up the people who buy ‘People’ magazine. The people who want to put you on the cover and then rip you inside. It’s just the way it works. But you have to get used to it. It’s a weird business. It’ll break your heart if you let it.”

A couple starry-eyed writers ask goo-goo type questions that she answers politely before I ask “How about your first movie, Picture Perfect? Are you satisfied with the way that turned out?”

Again, she’s painfully frank. Cocking her head to the side and looking at me like we’re connecting, she says “I don’t know how I feel about how it turned out. It was hard. Of course, I’m told ‘Never say that!’ But there were things we hoped would be different than they actually were and I don’t know if it was ready to go when we got started. I don’t know if the script was ready. But there was a lot of…uh…pages were coming down right before you’d shoot a scene just to try and have it make sense…” She stops talking. I don’t blame her.

“Was it good training?” somebody else queries.

“You know what?” she asks rhetorically, “I have to say that one had absolutely nothing to do with the other. That was a whole ‘nother lesson from that. The business end of the industry. [The Object of My Affection] was a lot more creatively satisfying. You just barely felt like you were making a movie. It was an unbelievable experience working with [she lists everybody in the cast, then goes off on how great the crew, the director, etc., etc., were, before actually saying] the whole experience, that it came out so great, was just like a cherry on top.

Though I liked her new movie a great deal — a romantic comedy about a single mom who convinces her gay male friend to move in and help raise the child — I did think it copped out at the end, so I ask “Then you’re satisfied with the end product? The movie has this beautiful melancholia, then sort of ends with this happy sitcomish finish…”

“Well it depends on your interpretation,” Aniston says thoughtfully. “What do you think the film is about?”

“I think it’s about how most people want what they can’t have,” I suggest.

“Uh-huh,” she agrees.

“But by the end of the film, most people have what they want.” I list a few examples. “It gets very commercial by the end.”

“Well, there was a different ending,” she says.

Three people at the table say simultaneously, “Really?!?”

Not noticing our surprise, Aniston continues, “But they have these things called test audiences…”

We’re all surprised because somebody is lying. I leap into the breach. “That’s odd,” I say. “When we interviewed [director] Nicholas Hytner, he said there were no other filmed endings.

It’s immediately apparently that Aniston is the one lying. She stammers out, lamely, “Uh … well, it was pretty much the same ending. It…It was just told … uh … a little differently. It’s not important actually. The characters ended up in a different area of the city, that’s all.”

Hmmm. Sensing her discomfort, a few folks ask softball questions that she answers gamely. The last question touches on the types of roles she is attracted to. So I follow up with “Have you noticed that both your major films roles have something big in common? Both characters want a man that she can’t have.”

“I like to see real life,” she answers nonchalantly.

“Is that real life?” I ask, figuring that here’s an opportunity for genuine insight into this actress.

We’re looking at each other. I’m trying to look interested, not challenging. She begins to stammer again. “It’s boring to just sort of…of…I don’t know why I love that…wanting something and not being able to have it…I don’t know why I picked…why I picked….”

I’ve talked to her before. I know her background and history. I keep pushing. “Do you think the estranged relationship you’ve had with your father might have something to do with it?”

She flinches. “I don’t know why I love these … these roles.” Aniston touches her hand to her face. “Maybe it is something I’m trying to work out in my own life.”

The rest of the table has gotten very quiet. I’m leaning forward in my chair, toward her. It’s like it’s just us talking. I find this woman very interesting and very easy to talk to and I’m surprised at what a good actress she’s become but I’m not really sure if she has what it takes to be a movie star and I want to know what she thinks about that and there’s no time like the present so here goes. “Look,” I say, “Do you think your popularity on TV might be working against you on the big screen? I’ve really thought your performances in both movies were good, but on TV you just seem so approachable. Even in the movies, you play down to earth people. Do you think that people just want movie stars that are glamorous and untouchable? Could that be working against you?”

Disaster. Aniston arches her back in the chair and casts me a wounded look. “Uhhhh…I don’t know if anything’s working against me yet,” she says. Then she adds, her voice breaking, “Are you working against me?”

I backpedal furiously, glancing at Tate Donovan, who looks at me with nothing short of hatred. “No! I don’t want to make it sound like a negative thing! But everybody’s looking for the person who’s going to open a film with a $25 million weekend…”

Aniston cuts me off. “But that shouldn’t be the main concern! If it was, I’d be doing Scream 3! It isn’t always so important to have a big hit! I want to have a career that lasts for a while!”

“I agree,” I agree. “But when we talked last year, you stated how the ultimate goal is to get from TV to film. You want to be an independent force, a star on your own. But in order for you to do that, you need to open a film. Now, I’m not trying to cast any aspersions of doubt on your talent. But your image is that you appear very accessible. Movie stars do not make it by appearing accessible.” Then, still trying to throw Aniston a curveball, I instead inadvertently make it a beanball right at her pretty head. “I mean, are you concerned that you don’t have what it takes to be a movie star?”

It is now obvious that she and I connected emotionally during the course of this interview, because I have genuinely hurt her feelings. We’ve still got eye contact, and I am beyond dismayed to see that hers are welling up with tears – genuine tears for chrissakes! — and her lower lip is trembling. “Are you…are you saying I don’t have what it takes?” she asks, her voice breaking.

“No! Please, no!” I sputter, hating myself and turning ass-kisser mode into overdrive. “I’m just saying that even though you’re such a beautiful woman, one of the things that makes you so appealing is that you seem so approachable. I mean, you’re a ‘Friend,’ we invite you into our home every week. Movie stars are different. What I’m asking is if you fear you’ll have to sacrifice what I feel is your greatest asset in order to take a chance on becoming a movie star.” Everyone at the table is looking at me with thinly veiled contempt. I don’t blame them. “Look, I’ve offended you and I’m sorry. Let’s move on to somebody else,” I finish. Literally.

Coolly, her eyes now far away, Aniston says, “No, you haven’t offended me. You definitely haven’t. I understand the question you’re trying to say now. But I don’t see where I need to become unapproachable. I hope not. I don’t want to.”

But she’s much less receptive now and it’s all my fault. I don’t ask another question for the rest of the session. No one seems to mind.
—————————————————-

ROTFLMFAO!!!! Whahahaha! That last part was HI-larious. Omg, I can just imagine the tears welling up, the wounded looks, the “But I am a movie star! I am!” yelps with the frantic Rachel hand waving and stuttering. Clearly Jennifer manipulates people into feeling like they need to protect her because of her fragile ego and lack of self esteem. She behaves like an insecure little girl. That interviewer had no right to feel bad.

Laura -

I cant believe you can hate a person so much as to run a smearing campaign on Angie. Not only that, you pretend you are an expert, in writing something which is not true.

I’ve seen many of your posts. You start from this “ugly feet” poster.

Let me tell you, psychiatrists wont give you an opinion without seeing a patient. So stop being a *******.

You will be infested with cancer. Remember you reap what you sow.

I swear, someone in Jen’s camp leaked a rumor that she was going to adopt just so she can get her face on Extra for 5 seconds while they say her publicist “denies it, ALTHOUGH they can’t rule it out in the future.” That b*tch wouldn’t adopt a kid unless it was a 15 year old girl that could do her nails, or a 15 year old boy that could do her hair!

Oh cool I didn’t know that Jennifer was interested in directing. I am interested to see this short film and see if she has directing skill. I wonder who wrote the script, if she had any input in it. Anyways, I heard that Jennifer is gueset starring on Courney Cox’s show Dirt. I have been watching Dirt and love it. I’m a huge fan of Friends so I’m excited to see both of them working together again. If anyone is interested there is a sweepstakes to win the entire Friends dvd collection and a new laptop at http://us.cyworld.com Has anyone heard of Cyworld? It’s a fun social networking site with avatars, virtual miniroom, a sketchbook, you can upload unlimited pics/video, and join lots of clubs. I just joined the Vip Club where they have cool contests and prize giveaways each month. I work w/Cyworld so check it out and enter the sweepstakes!

Laura -

Laura, I did not criticize Jen’s physical appearances, her personality. The only thing I said about Jen is

” Jen, by lying to the public, is doing the public a dis-service. She is essentially saying that if anyone has a breathing problem, see a plastic surgeon and NOT a ENT doc”. and I said this is wrong.

No, I did not call any names.

Laura, my husband is a physician. No, you are wrong. No medical doctor dish out advice without seeing a patient.

592
tiger Says:
_______________

I am referring to Laura, when I said, “…you reap what you sow…”.
Honest to God, I dont wish evil things on Jen, never slender her. I cannot police other people. When I said , “…reap what you sow…”, I am directing that at Laura.
Laura has written the most EVIL post I’ve seen in the last couple months.

Laura;

Your thesis on Angelina is full of holes because you’re basing it purely on actions that happened at least 6 years ago. You’ve completely negated that Angelina has grown up and changed due to some very extraordinary circumstances in her life. She became an ambassador for the U.N. and saw conditions and people living in them that wrecked her and changed her forever. Her words and also becoming a mother. She said she knew she’d never do another self destructive thing again and that she found a positive outlet for her feelings. She’s exhibited that in the 6 years since.

To sit there and say she’ll start drugs again because that’s her M.O. is b.s. That she’ll revert back to her behaviors when she hasn’t exhibitied those behaviors in 6 years. Is gross negligence on your part as well, as your so-called professionals part.

And you can not determine a diagnosis on anyone without talking with that person. Especially based on interviews in magazines when things are edited to tell the story the way the interviewer or magazine wants it presented.

All the people that know Angelina and know her well, have all said that she is the most perperceived person by the media that they know.

You can not get a clear cut thesis when you don’t know your subject.

You don’t want to know Angelina Jolie because you don’t like her. You’re thesis is already biased in that sense to come out on the short end of the stick. You were never objective. You’ve misrepresented her throughout your entire diatribe. You want Angelina to be in that box that you’ve placed her in without giving credence to the theory that what the hell happened? She grew up, that’s what happened.

And anyone that is going to support the theory that someone at 31 is the same person they were at 23 is full of crap. Including you.

Are your eyes brown? They should be because your full of s.h.i.t.

** the training of a medical doctor ***

A med student has to finish 4 years of medical school. He/she has to pass Step 1, Step 2, Step3 exams before he/she can graduate from medical school and be awarded an M.D. The 1st 2 years of medical school is basic science. The last 2 years of med school is clinical, rotation in each discipline.

The M.D. then will go thru 3 or 3 + trainings depending which specialty he/she choose. All doctors are governed by the medical board.

A psychiatrist will go thru 4 years of residency (training).

A doctor is trained to see a patient , diagnose and prescribe a treatment. All the doctors are trained to ask question, get answers, from the patient. This is always DONE FACE to FACE with a patient. Why? Because very often, a patient misses telling the doctor certain info., may describe certain symptoms in error. Therefore, a doctor is trained to detect . Think, if certain information is missing, the diagnosis will NOT be ACCURATE.

Therefore, NO doctor will give a medical opinion WITHOUT seeing a patient face to face.

If any post in this blog talks about this person has this or that problem or ailment based on TABLOIDS , this immediately is a red flag. Use your thinking cap.

Laura’s post talking about BPD is BASELESS !!!!