Brad Buys Apartment in Berlin

290
the real tita Says:

February 7th, 2007 at 2:45 pm
#267: Lady G: I’ve always said that B&A would be looped with HW’s greatest romances of all time.
************************8
I believe this too. I just love this couple. And their beautiful children too.

Friend say that it was always difficult for Aniston and Pitt to maintain the intimacy they craved while juggling their demanding work schedules, which often required long seperations. Those tensions notwithstanding, Aniston believed her marriage was the real thing. “We both did”, she says.
So what happened? I think- it changed, she says haltingly. “We both changed”.
She sighs again. “You do the best you can, and I think we did. We did the best we could”.
Both of them? She looks at me straight in the eye. “BOTH PARTIES”, she says.

300
Joy Says:
February 7th, 2007 at 2:52 pm
…Just thought you might feel better knowing that someone else read your post and read it’s true meaning…
*****************

Same here LadyG.

Wow Joy, you’re so thoughtful to go out of the way to think of mentioning it :)

300
Joy Says:

February 7th, 2007 at 2:52 pm

=====================================================

Thank you Joy. It truly hurt and upset me to be bashed that way.

Also thank you for understanding what I was saying and meant no harm to anyone especially Angie and Brad. That is not my style.

The Jolie-Pitt Smear campaign that was fueled with the Africa pictures
(which should not have been a big deal since these were two individuals that both had legitimate work in Africa - Jolie, UNHCR work and Pitt, Babel and ONE Campaign,
And the pictures were so harmless without even any follow-ups such as compromising positions or revealing skin - and, mind you they were at a beach)
has had life breathed into this only because of a powerful engine that had to be backed by insiders who would know Pitt’s movement.

Why Pitt and not the Jolie camp? Obviously, these insiders are not in the Jolie camp since her movements were harder to track unless she has public engagements or in public spaces like airports…Where are the pictures of her and her ’so-called’ lovers if the papz are so good at what they do or an insider was spilling??? She must have been in and out of hotels for them to at least get 1 picture.

And why would ‘insiders’ need to be involved? No tabloid would venture expenses unless they can secure ‘insiders’ that they can control the story. Remember, tabbies are in the bsn of making money and papz need to sell pictures.
The price has been set, the story put in place - but by whom.
Well, a puppeteer needs to orchestrate. A puppeteer who already has an engine in place to make a few quick calls here and there, access to the celebrities involved with the story unfolding, the power to influence the Hollywood/media elite groups.

So who in the Pitt camp, you ask?
- there had to have been a pact signed with the Devil by someone in the inside, since as Lainey so put it clearly when Pitt started to close all his open doors, you get media shutdown as has been occurring recently more and more.

- who on the ‘inside’ can do this, have the motivation to ’sell’ him out and provide the media outlets with such vitals as well as gain power over the media outlets. Since this ’sellout’ was to his disfavor, these ‘insiders’ would care less about him.

- who has been dictating how the spin of these pictures come out so that this would become a well-organized, well-directed marketing campaign to lure the audiences (and thus, for the tabloids - the readership) that would support their client into box-office turnouts suchas ‘The Breakup’ and, the timely entry of the Team Aniston/Team Jolie…..

- who has the most to gain if they can control this spin to their favor so that the media outlets would be feeding from their palms if they can provide the media outlets with a story that would last one year - two going on three, maybe more.

With that I’d have to agree with Cliniqua’s point, The Huvaniston camp is becoming the Invisible hand revealed.

The Huvaniston camp as well as the media outlets that have been milking this from them have been running scared of Cliniqua for doing an expose on the Exposes.
With this revealed, the readerships will feel exploited and therefore, the money train will be gone.

This marketing campaign has been better than the SuperBowl commercials put together.

The tabbies have been legitimizing their existence by saying they are part and parcel of being in Hollywood.
One doesn’t need scandal or public displays to work in Hollywood - goodness, look at Meryl Streep and Kevin Bacon and now Helen Mirren. Great work is awarded.
However, you do need to stay away from exploiters and coattail-riders who will drag you in the mud if they want to gain fame: poor Britney has seen this, Michael Jackson and Oprah have had sell-outs in their lives that have or are making their names toxic.

And, who would that be in the case of Pitt and Jolie - hmmm, who is a tabby reader??

“If I make a fool of myself, who cares ? I’m not frightened by anyone’s perception of me.”

I am an Angelina fan because She is not afraid to be honest. unlike a certain people in!

What’s the problem Reality? In your first post you bash Brad and Angie, and in the second you begin to whine why we bash The Liar, who spends her money on PR and plastic surgery. Typical hypocrite and stupid Fanidton. Or Huvane-slave.

From Premiere’s review of MMS’s dvd:

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are incredibly, unbelievably sexy people. Especially when they’re making out. Or beating each other up. If scientists could harness the power of their hotness, the country’s energy problem would be solved.

:lol:

Can someone PLEASE tell me what the Cover of the National Enquirer say?????

I’m asking for this info; because the website of the national enquirer is NOT working for me, so i cannot see the cover of the latest issue!!

So what exactly the cover say about the Brangelina/Aniston triangle?????

307
Lady G Says:

February 7th, 2007 at 3:04 pm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:)

299
Reality Says:

Your reality is the asylum, don’t forget to bring fakiston with you !

Banned from the ballot box
Why are Hollywood’s power brokers cast off by the academy?

http://theenvelope.latimes.com/awards/oscars/env-en-agents8nov08,1,7627685.story?coll=env-oscars
————————————————————

Glad the academy are run by smart people who refuse to let in untalentless people who are relentlessly push down our thoat by the over paid agents. money talks but it can only buy you a nose not Au Natural beauty or talent .

Speaking of quotes - something to take stock of (from an AJ interview circa Alexander/MAMS):

Do you read much of what is written about you? Ignore it?

AJ: I don’t actually - even if I hear there’s a nice article, I don’t read it. Cause I can’t. I don’t want that stuff in my sub-conscious. I love being an actress and work really hard when I’ve got a job, and I love a good film when I see it, but I personally don’t - it’s not something that’s important to me in life and not something that - it’s just not something I think about on a daily basis, not something I focus on. It’s not who I am, but I’m grateful I’ve had a career. I’m taking a break right now because there’s nothing I care to do, and I want to travel.