Jennfier Aniston Topless in ‘The Break-Up’

Poor Jennifer Aniston.

Photos of Jennifer Aniston topless in The Break-Up have officially leaked and are making the rounds on the Internets. In the film, Jen has a nude scene with co-star (and ex-boyfriend) Vince Vaughn where she walks through their apartment in a state of undress to tease him.

The photos are real and were published by French weekly magazine Choc.

jennifer-aniston-topless-break-up-01



Posted to: Jennifer Aniston
Related posts:

726 Comments

Pages: « 119 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 » Show All
Isabelle II @ 02/17/2007 at 11:05 am

Courteney Cox Behind Jennifer Aniston & Vince Vaughn Set Up
——————————————————————————–

By Cathy Beers
Feb 16, 2007

They starred in ‘The Break Up’ together and on her birthday Jennifer Aniston and Vince Vaughn reportedly starred in ‘the set up.’ According to a report, Jen BFF Courteney Cox was the mind behind getting Vince Vaughn out to Los Angeles as a big birthday surprise for Jennifer. The National Enquirer reports that the love connection attempt was unsuccessful, but the party was a huge success.

Courteney Cox Behind Jennifer Aniston & Vince Vaughn Set Up

The buzz went all over the entertainment media and web sites quickly when Vince was spotted ant Court’s house the night before Jennifer’s 38th birthday. Many wondered if the one-time couple were headed for reconciliation.

***

“(Courteney) set the trap beautifully but it didn’t pay off,” an insider tells the magazine. The insider dishes that there was ‘no awkwardness’ during the meeting, and Jennifer took the whole thing in stride. An earlier report from veteran gossip Mike Walker had already hinted that Court’s hubby David Arquette was already looking to set Jennifer up with a man. “I feel like I’m married to two women,” Arquette told pals according to the report, explaining why he’s now asking every good-looking, successful, bachelor he runs into if they’d like him to set them up on a date with Jen.

The source told Walker that that since Jennifer’s single, she and Courteney are spending practically every spare moment together, and he’s feeling a wee bit left out. With both, Court and david searching and with Vince possibly back in the picture - how long can Jennifer stay single?
==================================

Can’t wait to get rid of her much?

Isabelle II @ 02/17/2007 at 11:10 am

How about B&A fans stop posting here when Anuston fans stop bringing up the distant past? I try to keep my posts CURRENT [unless refering to some fanuston's posts that are outragiously uninformed about the past] She’s ******** up enough now that the past doesn’t even need to be brought up.

Isabelle II @ 02/17/2007 at 11:13 am

S.c.r.e.w.i.n.g is a swear word now?

lylian Says:
————————————————————–
When david said the same thing in TRL which is a live show it was edited out as as well?
I give a **** if Brad and Angie slept with each other, or slept with X Y z the problem here is lying. They always denied their relationship till mid of 2005 , had a kid on mid of 2006. If they were seeing each other they should have guts to accept it.. dont make third person involved look bad and potray yourself as saint!

Anyways what goes around comes around. People can never escape their Karma! I am 100% sure Angie is going to *********** for what she has done!
I rest my case.

Sam, hmmm, could you give me the link and the transcript of what David actually said through the whole TRL interview, including the question the interviewer asked? As I’ve already established, when comments are edited, truth is often the victim.

And really sam, your maths sucks and you shoot yourself in the foot.

Of course Brad and Angelina denied their relationship till mid 2005. They weren’t in a relationship (other then just being friends) in 2004, when Brad and Jennifer hadn’t split up. After the split, Brad and Angelina started to explore the relationship together. But, if you read the full interviews given by both Brad and Angelina around mid 2005 they didn’t say they weren’t together. they essentially said they were working things out and when they had something to say, they would let people know. But just because you are considering and thinking about whether you want to or don’t want to, doesn’t mean that you are actually in a relationship - not of the committed sort that they have now.

However, by September 2005, it was clear that Brad and Angelina wanted to be in a committed loving relationship with each other. Hence the baby. So tell me sammie, how, even according to you, did Brad and Angelina lie?? I rest my case about the lying.

As for Karma, please, you obviously know nothing about Karma as you seem to think that karma occurs like a sort of punishment. That’s simply UNTRUE.

Let me educate you a little about Karma, assuming you are willing to learn.

Karma is cause and effect. Your actions, your thoughts, your words - will produce an effect. Karma is neutral. Wrong thoughts, wrong actions, wrong words etc will produce pain. Right thoughts, right actions, right intentions, right words, will produce good effect.

Let me explain to you how karma works. Brad wanted to help out in NO, which caused him to take an active interest in the city. Right thought, right actions, right words - because for sure, NO needs help. As a result of his desire to help out in NO he buys his new home in the French quarter because he wants to be in NO for a longer period of time to work with Global Green. Then lo and behold, some property watchers are saying that in fact, the property market in NO is a buyers market, that it is undervalued and that they expect NO to recover because it is a great city. Talks about abandoning the city of NO has been itself abandon as people seem to realise that you cannot just walk away from a city like NO, which is part of America’s history. So, it seems Brad bought the property in NO at the right time and will make a good profit from it if he decides to sell some years later. See the connection between the right thoughts, right actions, right words, and then the effect, right rewards.

Now, even thought wrong thoughts, wrong actions and wrong words can and does produce pain, this is not necessarily a bad thing, provided the person learns from the pain. Learns about where and how he or she went wrong. Then right thoughts, right actions and right words will follow and the persons life will improve and correct and she will experience good effects. Karma isn’t hell. There is no perpetual punishment. Karma is compassionate. Karma rewards the good but isn’t there to punish the wrong. Karma teaches those who get things wrong, that they need to correct and improve and learn and experience good karma again and again. That is all.

So, will Angelina and Brad experience pain from time to time. Sure. They aren’t perfect. They are going to make mistakes and experience the effects of their mistakes, which would inevitably be painful. But if they learn from these mistakes, then karma will reward them too. It’s really simple.

Liliyan

Are you in LaLa land? TRL is a TV show which comes LIVE. David was there to promote DIRT. Do you think live shows are also edited out to make it more juicer? you can check any entertainment news theye might have posted it there.

Next. Ok dear my math sucks . According to you–>”September 2005, it was clear that Brad and Angelina wanted to be in a committed loving relationship” and in May their doctor was born. So when they realized they wanted to be in a commited relationship, first thing they did was make baby,, since siloh was born on May which comes 9 months after September.

I do appreciate Angie for her humanitarian works and do think that she has grown a lot since her Bob thorton days. but when someone is at fault just don’t cover it up with a page long rubbish explanation. Brad and Angie did lie and made a mistake.. it would have been great if they had acknowledged and moved on. Unfortunately they wanted to project Jen as devil..which is my whole point.

And for the definition of Karma let me tell u sweet and simple

karma - “karma is a Hindu word—>which means the effects of a person’s actions that determine his destiny in his next incarnation .

For your reference here is the definition for Karma

karma

noun
(Hinduism and Buddhism) the effects of a person’s actions that determine his destiny in his next incarnation

WordNet® 3.0, © 2006 by Princeton University.

—————————————–
As for Karma catching up to Angie and Brad .we will all be around and we will see in next couple of years. I rest my case!

Sam, please check this site as you seem interested in Karma:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma

WordNet’s definition of Karma is a simplification of a concept that is fundamental to the Dharmic religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism. Most Hindus and Buddhists don’t think that Karma will only affect your next incarnation though they believe it will do so.

If we were to take your definition of Karma, you wouldn’t know how Brad and Angelina will fare - as what they have done in this life will only determine their destiny in their next life. You won’t be around to know.

Here are some snippets from Wikipedia:

Karma literally means “deed” or “act” and more broadly names the universal principle of cause and effect, action and reaction which governs all life. Karma is not fate, for man acts with free will creating his own destiny. According to the Vedas, if we sow goodness, we will reap goodness; if we sow evil, we will reap evil. Karma refers to the totality of our actions and their concomitant reactions in this and previous lives, all of which determines our future. The conquest of karma lies in intelligent action and dispassionate response.
Karma is considered to be a spiritually originated law. Many Hindus see God’s direct involvement in this process, while others consider the natural laws of causation sufficient to explain the effects of karma.[10][11][12] Karma is not punishment or retribution, but simply an extended expression or consequences, of natural acts. The effects experienced are also able to be mitigated by actions and are not necessarily fated. That is to say, a particular action now is not binding to some particular, pre-determined future experience or reaction; it is not a simple, one-to-one correspondence of reward or punishment.

___________

And your maths still suck. Between May and September is 4 to 5 months depending on how you count it. Thats’ plenty of time for Brad and Angelina to decide if they wanted to be in a committed relationship or not. They did after all know each other as friends and work colleagues since January 2004.

_________________

As for TRL, well, without proof of what David said, you have nothing but allegations about what David said. We’ve already established that you maths sucks. You appear to have a tendency to simplify things without doing proper research (like just quoting wordNet’s definition of Karma to me). Perhaps your powers of observation and hearing aren’t much chop either.

However, enough. No more bandying of words with you by me, on this thread. You may, if you wish, have the last word on this. You have my permission.

Dear Liliyan

I have watched TRL and u can check and entertainment website if you are so desperate for the transcript.

And for your information Karma is a Hindu word and I happen to be of that religion . So i dont need your explanation for that word. Check with any of your Asian words to find out what exactly that means! before opening your mouth. Since we pay for what we do in this birth only brad and Angie don ot have to wait for next birth.

For Math-> Between September and May it is 9 months.According to you Brad and Angie wanted to be committed in September .It takes 9 months to carry a child so according to you first thing they tried after they realized to be in committed relationship is make baby.
Have you ever had a baby Honey? I have 3 Kids. You don’t get pregnant first time you have sex without protection. Probably you have to go and look wikipedia for that also unless you know anyone can go and edit stuff in wikipedia.

.Do you think you are G W Bush or any other lawmaker. You are not significant enough to grant me permission. So, honey I don’t need your permission for anything. Period. No more posting here. Get a Life!

Sorry to add between are you counting from september 2005- may 2006? or may 2006 to September 2006 Hon? I am talking about the former and it has 9 months I think you skipped couple of your math classes So put your glasses on before pointing fingers at me. Amen!

I call bull @ 02/18/2007 at 5:08 pm

Sam, why are you so worried whether Angie got knocked up July August or September? Jennifer hooked up with Vince in July 2005. Adulteress! By your standards she is.

And poor, poor lylian, you are castings your pearls before swine!

701
I call bull Says:
————————————————

LOL quite a character you guys are. It was all 3 who caused all this chaos. But definitely Brad is the prick. More than Angie…………..he had a commitment waiting at home. If he couldn’t keep his d**k in his pants bad for him…no one can guarantee he will stick with Angie either. And if they got together for Baby it is a very wrong reason to be together..He could have adopted also. Hope all this doesn’t go the Woody Allen family way.Creepy!

701
I call bull Says:
February 18th, 2007 at 5:08 p
And poor, poor lylian, you are castings your pearls before swine!
——————————————————————-
ROTFL! Unfortunately the pearls are fake in my opinion like BA.

I liked her more when she was with Brad Pitt,he made her look good next to him.

I call bull @ 02/21/2007 at 2:56 pm

703
Amelie Says:

February 20th, 2007 at 8:07 pm
701
I call bull Says:
February 18th, 2007 at 5:08 p
And poor, poor lylian, you are castings your pearls before swine!
——————————————————————-
ROTFL! Unfortunately the pearls are fake in my opinion like BA.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Perhaps, but the swine is still a swine. ROTFLMAOPIMP!!!!!!

I call bull @ 02/21/2007 at 3:11 pm

FROM ANOTHER THREAD:

1386
hmmmmmmm Says:

February 21st, 2007 at 9:26 am
1376
jq Says:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

On an entertainment show last night, they questioned CC about dirt pushing the mike directly in front of her face while menuevering a certain someone else back into a corner without speaking to her. You could hear her starting to pipe up but the she shut up as she got shuffled into the background. They even asked Cheryl Crow about a ring she she was wearing on her left hand. But NOBODY had any interest in what the third one had to say. Shapes of things to come? I hope so

———————————————————-
re: Her hookup w/Keanu

A=the source is Star ragazine

B= “I think Jen would welcome an invitation from him to go out, but he hasn’t asked,” says the source. “Jen was really taken with him- he’s funny and really self-effacing and in many
ways is actually pretty shy.”

Hehehe girl can’t even get lucky in a ficticious story

A=the source is Star ragazine

B= “I think Jen would welcome an invitation from him to go out, but he hasn’t asked,” says the source. “Jen was really taken with him- he’s funny and really self-effacing and in many
ways is actually pretty shy.”

Hehehe girl can’t even get lucky in a ficticious story

And now she’s she’s suddenly interested in politics, after they obviously snubbed her the entertainment tv interview.

TRANSPARENT & DESPARATE

706
I call bull Says:
———————————-

I can take anything real over anything fake any day! Swine included LOL

Jose Taquitos @ 02/22/2007 at 9:34 am

I like to swim.

On Jennifer Aniston suing Blogger Perez Hilton over the above topless picture ….. here are my thoughts …

Aniston agree to the above scene and surely she knows it’s a footage that might be be used . I have zero respect for the fact that now she is insisting on suing for it. Why now ? because everyone is making fun of her ? because she look damn ugly ? because she gets herself back into the news ? because it generate more interest in her or the movie/dvd sales ? Greed ? more greed ?

She was proud of her body to have agreed with the above outake before.. so i really do not understand why she needs to sue now.

At the rate she is going , Aniston is making a BIG mockery out of herself and all her silly PR action. Aniston showed everyone that she and her PR reads blogs, forum and fansites. — they know the bloggers have a mind of their own and do not care for some sh*t publicist telling them what to post or not to post . This drives Aniston nuts daily reading all the post stating her FRAUD . Aniston care enough of what some gossip monger say about her to warrant her time and effort to sue against some unknown blogger ?

Sometimes you wonder who post on these site damaging Brad and Angelina’s character …it’s definitely from the PR camp of the nut Aniston.

So can someone please send me this picture cuz i cant find it anywhere. PLEAAASSEEEEE Outkast23o@aol.com or Rmacky023@aim.com

her titz are meh.. ive seen better.. ive seen worse..

Jamilla she’s still fugly to me

Yup I’ve seen better boobies than that saggy jugs.

Courteney @ 03/07/2007 at 2:07 am

Definitely not a looker. I am much better than her.

I thought she going to adopt. Is she going to deny it once again? media HO at best!

think of yourself as neutral between angie and jennifer its really no doubt that Angelina is far more beautiful than Jennifer!!!!

thats reality!!!!!

Pages: « 119 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.