OlderSat, 10 February 2007 at 5:45 pm
Jennfier Aniston Topless in ‘The Break-Up’
Poor Jennifer Aniston.
Photos of Jennifer Aniston topless in The Break-Up have officially leaked and are making the rounds on the Internets. In the film, Jen has a nude scene with co-star (and ex-boyfriend) Vince Vaughn where she walks through their apartment in a state of undress to tease him.
The photos are real and were published by French weekly magazine Choc.
Share This Post:
728 Comments
I guess Anna Nicole was getting just too much attention…
Im glad angeline do sucks is out of here!! I couldn’t understand what she was saying with wrong spellings and wrong grammar..
anyways, enough of bring brangelina along in this thread… they have nothing to do with this.. we are concentrating on how un attractive Jen is…. and oh, how badly she acts as well!
126
hmmmmm Says:
February 10th, 2007 at 8:19 pm
I guess Anna Nicole was getting just too much attention…
***************************************************
it’s sad that anna nicole is dead! really, i’d rather hear about anna nicole over jen anytime and any day!!!!!!!!!!
122
ANGELINA DO SUCK Says:
February 10th, 2007 at 8:15 pm
***********************************
Angry…?
she is such a low life minipulative *****. This Monster is forever scheming,and for what ? she has no TALENT. The Creature can’t even buy looks . She is a zero minus actress. Give it up girl. Go shopping with Buffy and Tiff, forget about acting.
Peace~
101
Leprechaun Says:
February 10th, 2007 at 8:00 pm
http://i13.tinypic.com/33p65hi.png
Please take note, the one on the left is way better looking than the one nekked on the right.
———————-
Ahahahahahahahahahaha!!! NOOOOOOOOO!! It hurts, it hurts, it hurts! Hahahahaha!
…gasp….sob…phew…haaaa.
…and hey #105, Margaret - ask Huvane to let you have the night off, kay??….even if Angelina changed her mind and decided she was not going to have a children’s charity w/ St John, you do know NO ONE ON THE PLANET would bat an eye because she gives away 1/3rd of her income, has donated 4 million this year already, is a UN Global Humanitarian Award Recipient and has about a half dozen other charities and organizations that she founded and funded, CAPICHE you dumb mothaf***er?! LOL…but as is, her charity with St John is still happening and it will be one more amazing thing she has done among hundreds of others…so shelve the concern you DON’T have for the kids, ya fake hypocritical b**ch!
Finally Margaretard, here’s some “food for thought” FOR YOU….
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2007/02/CHINNIFER MANISTONS-childrens-charity-still-mia.BECAUSE SHE’S NEVER HAD THE INCLINATION TO HELP ANYONE OTHER THAN HER OWN TRAINWRECK SELF in LIFE - SHE’D RATHER BUY HER COLORIST A NEW MERCEDES SEDAN, POOR KIDS ARE NOT ON CHIN MANISTONS RADA, NOR ARE ANY OTHER LESS FORTUNATES.php
Maniston’s Children’s Charity Still MIA mainly because she’s never thought of spending her 110 million on anyone else but Chinnifer ‘FUG’ Maniston.
113
Observer2 Says:
February 10th, 2007 at 8:09 pm
105
Margaret Says:
February 10th, 2007 at 8:01 pm
=========================
For real, she tried to pull this sh*t on the other (B&A) thread and she was corrected,
but it isn’t like she ever lets the facts get in the way of a good argument
February 10th, 2007 at 8:22 pm
101
Leprechaun Says:
February 10th, 2007 at 8:00 pm
Please take note, the one on the left is way better looking than the one nekked on the right.
———————-
Ahahahahahahahahahaha!!! NOOOOOOOOO!! It hurts, it hurts, it hurts! Hahahahaha!
…gasp….sob…phew…haaaa.
…and hey #105, Margaret - ask Huvane to let you have the night off, kay??….even if Angelina changed her mind and decided she was not going to have a children’s charity w/ ** John, you do know NO ONE ON THE PLANET would bat an eye because she gives away 1/3rd of her income, has donated 4 million this year already, is a UN Global Humanitarian Award Recipient and has about a half dozen other charities and organizations that she founded and funded, CAPICHE you dumb mothaf***er?! LOL…but as is, her charity with ** John is still happening and it will be one more amazing thing she has done among hundreds of others…so shelve the concern you DON’T have for the kids, ya fake hypocritical b**ch!
Finally Margaretard, here’s some “food for thought” FOR YOU….
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2007/02/CHINNIFER MANISTONS-childrens-charity-still-mia.BECAUSE SHE’S NEVER HAD THE INCLINATION TO HELP ANYONE OTHER THAN HER OWN TRAINWRECK SELF in LIFE - SHE’D RATHER BUY HER COLORIST A NEW MERCEDES SEDAN, POOR KIDS ARE NOT ON CHIN MANISTONS RADA, NOR ARE ANY OTHER LESS FORTUNATES.php
Maniston’s Children’s Charity Still MIA mainly because she’s never thought of spending her 110 million on anyone else but Chinnifer ‘FUG’ Maniston.
105
Margaret Says:
February 10th, 2007 at 8:01 pm
_______________________
Margaret, please read carefully on what your link said, the following is an excerpt :
………In September 2005, luxury apparel maker St. John hired Jolie as its new spokesmodel. As part of the arrangement, the company agreed to create a foundation benefiting children’s causes, which Jolie was to oversee. …….
Read the bold faced print above . This is St. John’s RESPONSIBILITY to create a foundation. Jolie models St John’s clothing. She is NOT St. John’s management team. Employees DONT butt into the internal affair of St John.
Please write to the CEO of St. John and ask them. Jolie has NO part of this UNTIL a foundation is created.
~Is she smiling or crying in this picture?
Peace~
Ewwwwwwwww! she needs so much plastic surgery on her face.
she’s taking PR lessons from Paris Hilton
I am a Brad and Angie fan ,but come on you guys are being beyond cruel.
Just ignore her I do.
Margaret Says:
Nice try but Margaret, can’t you comprehend what you read? Lack a good education? ST JOHN TO SET UP CHARITY, NOT ANGELINA. OK? Radar wrong when they tried a similar story before, they do no research for the truth, print any old lie, LIKE YOU.
Now back to this pix. MAY BE HER WORST PIX EVER. If done deliberately to get attention will backfire because who will want to hire this unattractive person when there is C Diaz, K Hudson, SJP, Sandra B, Drew B, and others for romantic comedy roles.
People people people!!!
This is just a naked photo of a person grimacing that should have never been leaked (or stolen or whatever it was). Her boobs are fine…..or do you prefer blown up fake ones like Anna Nicole’s? Every 37-year-old I know would be delighted to have a skinny bod like this. Her face is grimacing, the picture should have never been taken, and now because we’re in the Internet age it’s shot round the world. I’m not a Jennifer Anniston fan. but if it’s the BAMSZ fans hooting and hollering, please please try to rise above this. I think Brad and Angie would NOT be happy with your behavior at all.
for comedy, there are many who are better than aniston
Kate Hudson
Cameron Diaz
Sara Jessica Parker
Sandra Bullock
Julia Roberts
Reese Witherspoon
to #140… this has nothing to do with brangelina fans!!! this thread is about how unattractive jen is and how she can’t act… i’m sure brad and ange will not mind..
101
Leprechaun Says:
I just fell out of my chair laughing at this. PRICELESS!!
101 leprechaun says: yes that is funny!! a little mean, but funny
140
leetle UN Says:
================
Thinking of taking your advice………ummmmmmmmmmmmm
NO!!! I don’t like her!
#
141
checkers Says:
February 10th, 2007 at 8:39 pm
to #140… this has nothing to do with brangelina fans!!! this thread is about how unattractive jen is and how she can’t act… i’m sure brad and ange will not mind..
**********************************************
OK then let’s try again:
No matter who you are or whom you like in the way of actors or what you like in the way of bodies, I think it’s cruel and childish to snort at a woman’s body in a picture that should have never been taken or leaked. I hope my children don’t grow up to be like you. But since I may be in the minority in this circus, I’ll just go to bed. A gossip blog is probably the last place to try to impart a bit of humanity….we all get to hide behind our fake names. If Jared ran a contest called “Prove you are not as ugly as Jen,” how many of you would send in naked pictures taken at inopportune times?
Now Cliniqua and the rest….that’s all she’s got! Give a gal credit for putting everything (!) out there for her “art”. Yeah, she does have a nice body, but anyone with her money and free time can have one if they so desire. What gets me is that she just really is always so damn UNCOMFORTABLE in her own skin! Whether she’s Rachel or Jen, it makes no difference….she’s just always so AWARE of herself. I’ve always wondered why she became an actress - does anyone know?
Soon we will see a Life & Style cover on “Jen’s Heartbreak” about the boobie pictures. And nobody will care.
146
leetle UN Says:
February 10th, 2007 at 8:52 pm
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You do realize that Aniston is filming a nude scene for a movie. IF she didn’t want nude pics out there, then don’t agree to do a nude scene. It’s pretty damn simple.
She can’t have it both ways. Though she tries.
Don’t cry while you’re the one prancing around on celuloid naked.
Inopportune time? I have yet to see a good time, lol.
This is taken off her movie and just showed a bit more then the movie showed, the face stays the same.
Sorry, this was not just a bad photo shot.
Pages: « 1 … 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 … 30 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!