Brad Pitt’s Boxers on Display

JJ you never need to explain or apologize to us–we are here at your discretion.

As far as kids walking without holding on to something–I’ve seen them as young as 7 months, but usually it’s 9 or 10 months. Since Shiloh is 9 months today, and since we’re seeing her wearing little hard-soled shoes, I’d bet she’s at least walking and holding on to tables or chairs–and maybe she’s even taken those first steps on her own.

On Shiloh walking. Neither of my kids walked until they were 15 months. They did start pulling up and creeping much younger than that but not fully walking until 15 months. It seems the normal age range is 10 months til 15 months for babies to start walking. I also noticed in my mommy’s group that the smaller, lighter babies walked much earlier while the boys and bigger babies walked later. Girls usually walk earlier too.

Susie–Yes, I hope you didn’t think I meant kids that walked about 10 months were slow. And it’s true girls and lighter babies get around at an earlier age. Frankly, when they first walk, it’s such a hair-raising time because they are into everything and falling and bumping into things–I don’t think it’s a bad thing for them to walk later at all. The friend of mine whose son walked at 7 1/2 months was stressed because he was so young and clumsy and always hurting himself.

kidi- I did not read into your post at all, I was just posting what I saw first hand. I barely set my boys down ever so they crawled and walked much later and I don’t know if they would have been earlier or if that was just them, I still carry them all the time, they are 3 and 4 and I love the closeness.. I definately had no problem with them not being mobile, much less stress for me too.

I really don’t think Brad has a problem with the Art Exhibit itself, it was the use of the pic on the cover of Vanity Fair without permission.
Brad loves photography and Artistic expression , I mean this picture is tame compared to some of his photo shoots out there.
I have no issue with Jared putting it up.

103
TO JARED SAYS:

February 27th, 2007 at 1:55 pm - flag comment
Dear Jared:
Please ban CLINIQUA. She’s the one giving BAMZS fans a bad name.
——————————–
This is crazy, CLINIQUA does not give the BAMZS fans a bad name.
You can’t ban others for having an opinion.

Jared thank you for the new thread with all the latest news about BAMZS.

The only time Brad was not pleased by this pictures it was because Vanity Fair used those pictures for their cover without his authorisation. Brad posed for this pictures to be taken and of course the artist has every right to use them in exhibitions to promote his work because THAT IS THE REASON THE PICTURES WHERE TAKEN IN THE FIRST PLACE. And Brad seems completely aware and cool with that since HE POSED FOR THEM. His only problem was with the MAGAZINE and not with the artist.

And as for the media trying to cause any conspiracy about Angie and Brad’s mum it just shows their desperation and ridiculousness. Brad and Angie have been visiting Brad’s parents in Missouri many times before as Angie have said in her interview and Brad’s parents have also visit them many times too when they where in Namibia and L.A. And just for the record Brad’s mum was already in town from the past weekend and that was long before Angie left for Africa. And there is nothing more normal that a grandmother to take care of the kids while the parents have to work.

Jane Pitt came to see her grandchildren and be with them while their mother had to be away for some days. Angie was scheduled to do this trip long time ago. She didn’t just take a plane and went to Africa.

People who wants to believe that there is any kind of problems are in huge a denial and completely delusional.

oh jared, why don’t you ban those loonies, who criticize and accuse wentworth miller of being gay!!

I don’t think Brad has a problem with the pics. Didn’t he send a letter to Wilson after the whole VF incident? I think the article was posted at bradforums or here.

CLINIQUA SAYS:
February 27th, 2007 at 1:43 pm

Bottomline, it is JARED’S blog and if you don’t like what he has to post, if you find yourself having to hold your breath everytime you click on JJ….then don’t. I’m sorry but this is getting tedious, we keep having discussion on how people are entitled to their opinions on JJ, then why isn’t Jared entitled to post whatever he wants? Honestly, I am trying to understand the issue here…how many times have you or anyone else gotten on Perez Hilton’s case for posting certain things? What about Dlisted? I can safely assume…never yet there is no qualms about picking on Jared. I guess it is the nice guys finishing last syndrome at play here.

I like Jared but sometimes I wish he would be a little like PH and the Dlisted guy. It seems he’s allowed this to happen by entertaining people’s complaints and trying to do what’s RIGHT but Instead of being praised for it, he gets smacked at every turn. Maybe if he had ignored us and did whatever pleased him…. like all the other blogs do, we won’t have people questioning his every move or believing they have a say on how he chooses to conduct his site.

And the idea that maybe…just maybe there is something sinister afoot…that maybe Jared has been paid off or some fans have been bought off is just ludicrous. This is a freaking blog for goodness sakes not parliament. Why must we carry on like it’s life or death?

93
first and last post SAYS:

February 27th, 2007 at 1:36 pm - flag comment
To Jared,
The regular posters on your blog recognize you as Brad and Angie supporters but because you are, unfortunately you become a target as well by those who just want to attack anyone who supports this family. You are well within your rights to determine who posts here and for me as a long time lurker and regular of the BAMZS threads, I hope you continue to use your prerogative to eliminate derogatory and meanful posters. There should be no acceptance of or silence towards hateful disparaging remarks with a vile attitude and intent amongst civilized respectful individuals.
If one is intelligent…expressions of extreme distain or acrimony can be written eloquently without insult and degradation to another human being. As an advocate of free speech, I purport that freedom to express oneself does not mean freedom to randomly hate especially directed at those who cannot defend themselves without ramifications, such as immediate removal and permanent ostracism from the site unless proven and consistent behavior modification.
It is your task and as the overseer and manager of this site it must be overwhelming and frustrating at times, but you are doing a great job and there is no need for you to explain, apologize, justify or concede to anyone’s request. Do not jeopardize your site with unwarranted legal ramifications with pressure to post photos you are not legally entitled to…we all lose if you do. The Just Jared BAMZS threads have an incredibly highly intelligent, educated and sophisticated base of posters and lurkers from all over the world who congregate here to read, obtain information and links from each other, who exchange thoughts and ideas on a multitude of topics and who support one another.
I can only speak for myself but like me, I suspect the majority respect and appreciate you and the forum you have provided for us to meet like-minded. Others need not stay if they do not abide by your rules. They can gather at sites that cater to their like-minded orientation of hostility and anger. Thank you Jared and your associates.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Very well said. Thanks for that

114
think positive! SAYS:

February 27th, 2007 at 2:12 pm - flag comment
Jared thank you for the new thread with all the latest news about BAMZS.

The only time Brad was not pleased by this pictures it was because Vanity Fair used those pictures for their cover without his authorisation. Brad posed for this pictures to be taken and of course the artist has every right to use them in exhibitions to promote his work because THAT IS THE REASON THE PICTURES WHERE TAKEN IN THE FIRST PLACE. And Brad seems completely aware and cool with that since HE POSED FOR THEM. His only problem was with the MAGAZINE and not with the artist.

And as for the media trying to cause any conspiracy about Angie and Brad’s mum it just shows their desperation and ridiculousness. Brad and Angie have been visiting Brad’s parents in Missouri many times before as Angie have said in her interview and Brad’s parents have also visit them many times too when they where in Namibia and L.A. And just for the record Brad’s mum was already in town from the past weekend and that was long before Angie left for Africa. And there is nothing more normal that a grandmother to take care of the kids while the parents have to work.

Jane Pitt came to see her grandchildren and be with them while their mother had to be away for some days. Angie was scheduled to do this trip long time ago. She didn’t just take a plane and went to Africa.

People who wants to believe that there is any kind of problems are in huge a denial and completely delusional.

=====================================================
GREAT POST TP