OlderBrad Pitt Kisses Another Woman
… on set the of The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. So, don’t get your panties in a bunch!
Brad was spotted shooting kissing scenes with a female co-star on Thursday evening on the set of his new film, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button in New Orleans, Louisiana. Kissy, kissy!
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is out in 2008 and tells the story of an odd romance that sparks between a woman of 30 and a man who, at 50, begins aging backwards.
Yesterday morning, Brad took baby Shiloh, 10 months, to play with the other tots on the movie set.
UPDATE :: The lucky gal is supposedly actress Julia Ormond, 42, but it doesn’t look like her at all. actress Megan Brown.
You can also watch the video of Brad Pitt kissing on set. One of the female paparazzi in the background says, “Lucky girl!”
1,011 Comments
good morning bamzsers, I hope everyone is enjoying this day! :)
PT- again, thank you. I think you need your own show on the comedy channel, you have a gift for satire. :lol: :lol:
ne1 know how i save brad kissy vid to my computer?
#
839
Lady G Says:
March 4th, 2007 at 9:16 am - flag comment
_____________________________________
Thank you for this post. I too have had to deal with toxic parents. I take it you read the book on toxic parents?
thanks P.T.love it babe!
844
anustin Says:
March 4th, 2007 at 10:00 am - flag comment
if brad and anjie doesn’t care with that brainless TITIANAS BEAMHEAD,why should i.this people are(trump.douglas,beams etc…are ignorant!maybe b/coz BAMSZ fans are allover the world and they know that we are going to defend this family in everyway.GO CLINIQUA!THUMBS UP TO U!
***********
Can someone say [crazy] and [deranged] lol.
You people are insane. Tatiana Beams doesn’t control all media in all the land fools!
At the time of Jolie’s adoption scandal in 2002, ALL media outlets were reporting EXACTLY what Beams is simply saying NOW. Get it? Look it up. Look up “Jolie Cambodian adoption scandal 2002″ and you will see EXACTLY what Beams is saying now - reports from CNN, Washington Post, Fox EVERYWHERE. Are they all conspiring against Jolie? Do you understand? Beams is not saying anything that wasn’t in the news in 2002. Beams is not saying anything that wasn’t in the news in 2002. It WAS REPORTED THEN BY THESE MEDIA OUTLETS that the Cambodian adoption laws became stricter because of Jolie’s scandal!!!! Look it up you fools!! It’s all there, 5 YEARS AGO. Do you understand? All of your “investigating” is fluff and more fluff - because ANYONE CAN LOOK IT UP AND SEE THAT BEAMS ISN’T SAYING ANYTHING DIFFERENT THEN WHAT WAS SAID 5 YEARS AGO.
I realize your hard on is to prove Beams is an aweful creature because she has merely spoken the truth about Jolie. Beams has not been vicious or unkind - only called it what it is. Do you seriously think (well, Cliniqua is a certifable nut job) that Page Six of the NY POST don’t know the facts? Cliniqua is a crazy whack job, the rest of you must be extremely bored to go on about an “investigation.”
As I said, just look it up and read all the news about the Cambodian adoption scandal for yourself.
PT - Thank you ….. After I got my cup of coffee, I went right to JJ’s specifically hoping to find your brilliant work. You always give me giggles when I read your analysis.
I laughed so hard at this one about Shi’s blankie:
* OuttaTouch points out that the blankie is monogrammed “SP”. (Sidebar: Those of you who know me know those are MY INITIALS, too, so how can OuttaTouch be positive that that’s Shiloh’s blankie and the little bugger didn’t steal mine?)
Again, I think that you are a very talented, funny writer. I was watching a special on CNN last week called “Chasing Angelina” and it was covering the lengths that paps and rags will go to to publish stories about celebrities. Larry Hackett from CNN said that many publicists are c/o about blog sites because they dont’ have to legitimitize their stories (as if the rags do).
But, what Larry Hackett went on to say is that people who are blogging in some cases are genius/very funny and some of these people should be writing Hollywood scripts. You are who I thought of.
Keep it up! So many people here look forward to it. Hey about this? Could Jared just give you a thread each week, a salary so you could dissect the tabs even more? Just thinkin’…..
gogreen no one cares what you think fcuk off.
628
guli Says:
March 3rd, 2007 at 6:06 pm - flag comment
Wooopp!!!! Sorry Ale,x we are still #1 we just beat UM. OK, its time for my wine
==========================================
Guli - I have to find a bandaid to stop my maize-n-blue blood from running all over my keyboard. OUCH! We will be seeing you again in the Fall though, and just may be able to overcome your beloved Buckeyes……
Have a good day. Gonna try to catch up on this post - it got so long since I left last night to see Zodiac. A little long, but I enjoyed it. Mark Ruffalo has eyes to die for!
Thanks for the tab recap Passing Through it was funny.
Someone has already posted the facts behind AJ’s adoption of Maddox. It was an in-depth read and showed how AJ was not held responsible for the problems with the adoption agency in question. I suggest those who want to make a scandal out of it, look it up for themselves. BP and AJ know that their adoption of their fourth child will be scrutinized by critics and people who want to smear them, so they will be sure to follow the letter of law in that country. Critics have tried to smear and attack AJ when she adopted Maddox to no avail. Maddox is still a Jolie-Pitt and he is still thriving with love and care. Zahara is still a Jolie-Pitt and she is a still thriving with love and care. All this information has been rehash and rehash. Those with hidden agendas and Gossip columnist with bogus experts are only trying to stir up controversy and get hits for their web sites. Meanwhile, the Jolie-Pitts continue to live their lives and expand their family. I wish them all the best.d
GoGreen…ritzygal is that you again in one of your newer names????
856
GoGreen Says:
_______
LOL GoGreen = Tatiana Beams.
Tatiana Beams is a fraud.
From SimplyBrad
Benjamin Button mention: How did you become involved with “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”? David Fincher: I read a script many, many years ago. It’s a really beautiful story, but I didn’t feel that it was makeable in that incarnation. I told Brad [Pitt] about it years ago, and then it was being offered to him, but they didn’t have a director, so they brought it to me, then I worked on it for about four years, and now it’s finally at a place where the studio wanted to throw the kind of money that it would take to execute it. So here we are in New Orleans, making it.
There is more in the article but I’m not a member :(
GoGreen…do you mean Go rachel Green? Or you are just environmentally concious? Just asking…
PT– The Kingsford charcoal (burning bridges — burning X — love it) got to me today as well as Jolie as a clinging, insecure limpet. Your weekly roundup is a breath of fresh air. and a good release of humor just when it is needed!!!
Bonnie Fuller is a desperate woman.
Question—- Why everytime Bonnie Fuller speaks she does it VERY SLOW? And the way she utter words she seems so elementary. But heck, she got one vivid imagination.
PT, thanks for tabs reports.
856
GoGreen/Mary/Chloe/or whatever name you changed Says:
_________________
admit it, you are a certifiable paid staff from Huvanne who tried very hard to take on Cliniqua. . So far it hasnt worked, has it?
dont lie. all your posts reflect your INTENT.
well, go and ask Huvanne for a pay raise, tell him your job is harder than you think.
Good morning, thank you everyone for the research.
I love this family.
Cliniqua, keep up the good work.
Hey fellow fans….there’s another hater, her name is “sherkthethird” on the last thread about Angelina Adoption in Vietnam. She reminds me of “yen”,”reality” & “finally” harassing the other poster who support Angelina. She been at it for over few pages already. Do you think she’ll be ranting for 8 hours just like “finally”. Could it be “sherkthethird” got a raise from Huvane that is why she rants more often.
Some of these haters prefer to post on old threads so they will not get detected. Typical Anuston fans tactic.
Also, one of their tactics, pretend not be a fan of Aniston you just dislike Angelina kind of thing. Yeah right, if you dislike Angelina & not a fan of Aniston why keep on posting on every thread about Angelina? And have the decency to read all out posts even it is 30 pages long…What a bunch of nutjobs these Anuston fans are.
Cliniqua - Do you have a target on your back? I like the passion and information that you bring to this site.
There were about 5 or 6 of us contributing our research and opinions to the Tat Beams intrigue yesterday, but because your personality is bigger than ours, you caught the heat. Well, I’ll send you a fan to deflect any future heat directed at you when a group of us are reading, writing and learning about a subject that we find interesting.
857
Izzie Says:
March 4th, 2007 at 11:25 am - flag comment
PT - Thank you ….. After I got my cup of coffee, I went right to JJ’s specifically hoping to find your brilliant work. You always give me giggles when I read your analysis.
I laughed so hard at this one about Shi’s blankie:
* OuttaTouch points out that the blankie is monogrammed “SP”. (Sidebar: Those of you who know me know those are MY INITIALS, too, so how can OuttaTouch be positive that that’s Shiloh’s blankie and the little bugger didn’t steal mine?)
————————
Izzie, that specific part of PT’s Tabloid report cracked me up too!! :lol:
Cliniqua you have many screen names. You are micro, PR Intern, BCBG, passing through, KT22, KK1, lylian julia, bermy girl, ntt, sandisk, faye and who knows how many more. Hilarious! Go ahead Cliniqua and have your different screen names defend “themselves” as “not” being you - that’ll be fun! Where do all these new names who sound just like you come from? The voices in your head….One whack fan making herself into a few whck job fans. Fun to watch!
Yes, you will make up different screen names to praise your own posts and do the same amongst the different screen names themselves. You will also agrue with yourself once in a while so that people don’t catch on that it’s ALL YOU. Below is one example of you responding to you - you defend yourself pretty good! Anyone with half a brain, and Jared knows your kind of crazy - it’s not difficult to detect your voice and Cliniqua “isms.” Over 800 post and most of them are CLINIQUA. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA.
So go ahead Cliniqua, what screen name will defend you first…????!!!!!
663
CLINIQUA Says:
March 3rd, 2007 at 7:50 pm - flag comment
Greetings all,
I’ve been catching up here since I did my research on the phony Page Six adoption expert, ‘Tatiana Beams.’
Boy, has it been extremely good reading in here today - thanks to all who responded and weighed in on my post!
Thanks to PR Intern, YOU are a gem - and I hope you stick around and post more. What you’ve written about today really is enlightening, and makes so much so sense. I especially liked your timeline re Aniston and how Page Six slowly turned on Angelina. These posts are keepers and I intend to save them all to reference back to.
Also, to the people who don’t know what to make of Don’t Shoot Me — I’ve read all of her posts today while catching up - her posts are positive and in support of Angelina and the family — and not only should she NOT get banned, I believe if she’s possibly someone on the inside, it’s great that she’s here! May I ask that you PLEASE go back and read ALL of her posts and judge for yourself. Even if she’s not the real deal - what she has to say is still all positive, so I don’t get why a few people are going after her. Read her posts again. I may be one of the few fans who think that Jon Voight is redeemable, and still has things to offer his children if he’s gotten his own sh*t together. So I really liked that ‘Don’t Shoot me’ one-liner, about Angie talking to him again. Also, the fact that when Angelina is home she is totally hands on with her baby (and very likely doesn’t let too many other people hold her - esp if Brad is working), fit the AJ as I’ve come to know her. She is the only child now who cannot walk - so I also don’t find that little piece of info from ‘Don’t shoot me’ odd at all, it also IMO, is TOTALLY in character that AJ would be the only one always holding the baby at home. I would have loved to see that little girl’s face when Mommy returned home from her short trip. Something in the way that Shi is looking at the lady with dark hair in Brad’s on-set pics - made me think that perhaps Shi is thinking she looks like Mommy…she just seems fascinated with the lady at first before she sees the cookie. hahaha!
Anyway, just to repeat…don’t ban ‘Don’t Shoot Me.’
I think we have a few people on this site who actually might be in the know…PR Intern, perhaps Don’t shoot me…and others — and we don’t want to inadvertently shoot our ownselves in the foot.
read posts carefully.
Ladies, I suggest you write to the publisher of the Tat Beams’ article to link you up with the woman if she exist. We’ll eagerly await their reply.
GoGreen, you are obviously very new and green. Cliniqua is Cliniqua.
Pages: « 1 … 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 … 41 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!