Top Stories

Brad & Angelina: Baby on the Way

Brad & Angelina: Baby on the Way

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are making the proper arrangements to adopt a child (probably a baby boy) from from Vietnam and find a sibling for Maddox, 5, Zahara, 2, and 10-month-old Shiloh. The superstar couple and their big news make their way onto the cover of this week’s Us Weekly and People Magazine.

Us Weekly first reported the news last month but the Associated Press didn’t officially report on Angelina filing adoption papers until last week.

Brad, Angelina, Zahara, and Shiloh were last spotted out on a Monday morning stroll in the French Quarter while Maddox was in school.

Since January, the Jolie-Pitt family has settled into their $3.5 million mansion in New Orleans, where Brad has been filming The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (kissing another woman!). But soon they’ll return home to Los Angeles, where Brad will wrap up his Button filming.

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Paris Hilton's on a billboard...and isn't happy - TheSuperficial
  • Levi Johnston and Jon Gosselin film together - Dlisted
  • David Beckham and Cruz sport matching 'dos - LaineyGossip
  • Carrie Prejean: Sex tape was "the worst mistake of my life" - PopEater
  • Penelope Cruz is bella in Rome - PopSugar
  • Taylor Lautner covers Men's Health's December issue - JustJaredJr
  • Check out Emma Watson's Elle Girl outtakes - Celebuzz
Photo: RHS/WENN

996 Comments

# 1

First!! Thanks JJ

# 2

i’m the first!:)

# 4

darn, you beat me to first place QQQQ!:)

# 5

Who cares? Are they the only ones parenting children in the world?

# 6

I do care. I love this family soooooooooooo much

# 7

We care because they represent more than parents. Thanks Angellina for being a voice in Darfur. Thanks for being a brave woman .
This is the latest news:
KHARTOUM, Sudan - Gunmen have killed two African Union peacekeepers and critically wounded a third in Sudan’s western Darfur region, the AU said Wednesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The peacekeeping mission said it was “deeply concerned” the gunmen were believed to belong to the Sudan Liberation Army, the rebel faction that signed the Darfur Peace Agreement in May 2006.

That signatories of the accord would attack peacekeepers is a severe blow to international attempts to promote the peace process and persuade other warring factions to join it.

The gunmen abducted and killed the two peacekeepers while they were “on administrative duty” Monday in the Darfur town of Graida, the AU said. “A third soldier was critically injured,” the statement said, without giving details of how the attack was carried out.

“This deplorable and condemnable act was perpetrated by gunmen believed to be elements belonging to Sudan Liberation Movement or Army (Minni Minnawi faction), which is in full control of Graida,” the statement said, referring to the leader of the SLA who signed the peace agreement.

In Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, where the African Union has its headquarters, an official said the slain peacekeepers were Nigerian.

“They were just shopping. They were unarmed and they were attacked by unidentified men,” said Mahmoud Kane, the head of the African Union’s Darfur Integrated Task Force.

The deaths brought to 11 the number of AU military personnel who have been killed on duty since the force was deployed to Darfur in 2004. Another peacekeeper is listed as missing.

With the 7,000-member AU force overwhelmed in a region the size of Texas, the U.N. Security Council last year recommended replacing it with more than 20,000 U.N. peacekeepers. The Sudanese government has rejected this, insisting the AU needs only technical assistance and equipment from the United Nations.

Also Monday, about 30 gunmen of groups that signed the May accord surrounded an office for the implementation of the peace agreement in El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur, and “threatened the officer-in-charge,” the AU said.

The African Union is “deeply concerned that these, and other recent incidents of this nature, occurred in El Fasher and Graida, both of them strongholds of the signatories.”

The AU said the slain peacekeepers’ vehicle was stolen. It called on the Minnawi faction to investigate the attack and ensure the vehicle is returned.

More than 200,000 people have died and more than 2.5 million people have been displaced in four years of fighting in Darfur. The conflict began when members of the region’s ethnic African tribes took up arms against what they saw as decades of neglect and discrimination by the Arab-dominated government in Khartoum.

The government is accused of unleashing a pro-government Arab militia that has committed many of the atrocities in the conflict.

Several rebel factions refused to sign the May accord, leading to an escalation in fighting.

# 8

Anon, NOOOOOOOOO, they’re not the only parents in the world, but they are, at least, trying to make a difference! what have you done to make a difference in a child and/or anyone’s life or a community???? if you don’t fit any of the described above, then do yourself a favor and keep quiet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

# 9

Good for them. If they are willing and able to adopt, more power to them.

I hope everything works well for them both.

If you don’t care you don’t need to post. Seriously Angelina is doing more than her fair share to help the orphans, women and refugees around the world. Angelina you have our supports as much as you want. Best wishes to you and your family.

Thanks Jared and Audrey!

I am happy for the Jolie-Pitt Family and I hope that more blessing comes their way. They can give a child(ren) a good home and I say more power to them.

Rock on BAMZS+1!

[Fug Face Maniston] @ 03/07/2007 at 10:53 am

Awwwww.

Angie is so brave an her work for UNHCR is adorable. You have to love and admire that woman.
What a woman.

I love this couple, but come on…poor little Shiloh is only 10 months…if they keep adding children, there is no possible way to give all those kids the necessary attention…they are saving a life, but I always think, at what expense? Just because you save a child from poverty and place them in wealth, does not always make it right…they need a connection to their parents and if they add 10 kids, you know they cannot possibly carry on full-time duties with their social schedules…they kids will be pushed off on nannies…I know I’m probably offending a lot of Brangelina lovers, but it’s my opinion and they are not perfect…I love them, but hey, give Sholih and Zee some time before adding on a new kid to the brood…

From Lainey @ 03/07/2007 at 10:58 am

The Cover Pitts

Us Weekly and People have both put the Family on the cover, pimping the Pitts who are always good to sell at newsstands… and why not? Look at them!

Nothing new in terms of content: it’s a boy, around 4 years old, they began the procedure months ago, could be a while yet before they bring him home – all things you already know. What’s new from my sources is that the couple is already prepared and bracing for backlash from critics over suspicion into the adoption process which is why they supposedly have given the green light to Vietnamese officials to reveal as much information as possible without compromising crucial information to encourage transparency and avoid another “Malawi”. Scrutiny into this aspect of the situation is not a concern.

However, what does irritate them are the questions about the timeline and why the adoption so soon after the Chosen One’s arrival. Rumour has it Brad sees this not as a challenge about their parenting but a challenge about race. I’m told he was on the phone some time late last week and he mentioned something to the effect of (my source paraphrased) – “we got pregnant with Shiloh less than a year after bringing Z home and I don’t recall anyone saying that was too short. So is it because it’s too short or is it because Shiloh is biological?”

Also – Maddox is rumoured to have traveled with Angelina last week with a quick stop in Vietnam. Have received multiple reports of sightings on a Cathay Pacific flight, Angie and Madd were in Business Class, very low key, Maddox was sleepy but apparently still full of personality and hugged his mom a lot, they were on their way to Hong Kong presumably connecting to LA back to NOLA.

Will keep you posted.

I hope you don’t mind my writing three times, please everyone who has a soul, do not let HW entertainment and tabloid sensationalism blind your eyes to the serious issues around the world that are being raised. Tabloids use Angelina to make money by selling lies, open your eyes and ears to the issues, stop paying attention to irrevelant tabloid gossips, although I do support People mag. for trying to find out the facts before printing. Please help raise awareness for the women issues around the world like Angelina does. Many thanks to the fans who research and contribute to these efforts.

She said that about Madona adopting from a place that does not allow adoption and she is break their rules by trying to adopt as a single parent since its not allowed to let two people living together to adopt there.

People’s cover and US Weekly’s cover say it all:

Brad loves Shiloh

Angie Loves Zee (& Mad & Viet Boy and every other godforsaken urchin that will come along)

Thanks Just Jared. Congrats to BP and AJ. I wish them all the best. It is good to see a superstar couple such as BP and AJ give their time, money and name to worthwhile causes. It also good to see them open their hearts and home(s) to needy children as well as have their own. Best wishes to BAMZS+1.

Jennifer chose her life no one make that choice for her, if she wanted Brad, she had to make comprise.
In relationships you don’t suppose to see yourself only, you have to see your husband or partner too. Jennifer is so selfish she refused to have a baby with Brad. Don’t blame Brad or Angie for that. It’s time to move on, let Jolie- Pitt family live their life.

I don’t want to sound bitter a do like what she is doing to help the world but she can adopt anywhere she wants that wouldn’t be breaking any rules.

How will they communicate with a four year old Vietnamese boy? He probably won’t speak English at first.

so what if went around adopting a bunch of orphans.. will you guys stalk me too?
i mean BIG DEAL! shes getting another kid
so what. there are bigger and better things going on in the world.

[Fug Face Maniston] @ 03/07/2007 at 11:04 am

Oh Zahara, Turn that frown upside down. [lmao] Crack a smile for once kiddo.

Once she understands the quality of life she’s living. she’ll never stop smiling.

don’t worry, he’s still young and he will be able to pick up english pretty quickly. oh! just as long as the family speaks ‘english’ to him daily!:)

Isabelle II @ 03/07/2007 at 11:05 am

13
T Says:

Aparently you’ve never heard of Irish Twins. These are two bilogical kids born at seprate times but within the same year. I’ve know children from families with more than one pair. They are very happy with a lot less money!! :lol:

Mediterranean @ 03/07/2007 at 11:07 am

A boy from Far East, a girl from African, then a Sagittarius one.

Brad can have two 3 A TABLE teams. He really wants his soccer dream to come true.

Thanks Rachel, I fully concur with your view. So much for these idolising stalkers. There are so many other people, famous and non-famous that adopt and are good parents. But do they get the JoliePitt treatment? No. When Angie was with Billy Bob she didn’t get such accolades, despite adopting Maddox then. Probably because Billy is fugly. This is what it boils down to, they’re getting the extra attention because of their looks not deeds. STOP IDOLISING AND GET A LIFE Y’ALL.

Peace.

Anon Says:

STOP IDOLISING AND GET A LIFE Y’ALL.
====================================================
What is it to you if I idolize them or not? It’s my life, ain’t yours!!

Anon, the problem is that the MEDIA only pays attention to Brad and Angie? The MEDIA should pay attention to other celebrities as well, but the MEDIA doesn’t and only choose to pick on the Brangelina and they know that it sells whenever talking about the Brangelina!!!!!! Get through your thick SKULL Anon and Rachel!!!!!!!!!!!!

16
roses Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 10:59 am - flag comment
She said that about Madona adopting from a place that does not allow adoption and she is break their rules by trying to adopt as a single parent since its not allowed to let two people living together to adopt there.
================

If you don’t mind, please go to the previous Brad Pitt thread. We discussed that “breaking the rules” at length. There are very intelligent posts on that thread, and they are a real pleasure to read.

Mediterranean @ 03/07/2007 at 11:12 am

Zahara does not smile because she does not want to have wrinkles on her face. You, as a woman, have to pay attention on this kind of thing even at 2 of age.

Of course, my answer sounds so ridiculous as much as the question of why she doesn’t smile at all.

#
30
Anon Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 11:08 am - flag comment

Thanks Rachel, I fully concur with your view. So much for these idolising stalkers. There are so many other people, famous and non-famous that adopt and are good parents. But do they get the JoliePitt treatment? No. When Angie was with Billy Bob she didn’t get such accolades, despite adopting Maddox then. Probably because Billy is fugly. This is what it boils down to, they’re getting the extra attention because of their looks not deeds. STOP IDOLISING AND GET A LIFE Y’ALL.

Peace.

****

wow, I think I love you. LOL
I cant grasp this crap im reading.. why are they idolizing them to the point of getting LIVID when someone posts other views.
i guarantee you if any of these freaks approached BRANGELINA with this STALKER LIKE attitude, they would be hit with a restraining order..
give it up people.

I admire them alot for their courage and love towards their causes, i am not up to criticising them , i am an african and i have been staying in Europe for about three years now and i can say this with all authority, the upbringing here is totally and i mean totally different FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD, i know it is all about making the world a round place and all and everyone learning to love onE another , it ain’t going to happen never , cultures, traditions will always be different and with four kids i pray to God they know what lies ahead , because it will be tough many times and easy for just a little time, i wish them the best but something tells me they are ready for the journey but are not really sure how it is going to lead.

35
Mediterranean Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:12 am - flag comment
Zahara does not smile because she does not want to have wrinkles on her face. You, as a woman, have to pay attention on this kind of thing even at 2 of age.

Of course, my answer sounds so ridiculous as much as the question of why she doesn’t smile at all.
===================================
LOOOOOOOOL

isitreallythatserious? @ 03/07/2007 at 11:13 am

15
T Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 10:58 am - flag comment
———–

My mother was raise with eight brothers in a house with both parents who worked and turned out quite well. I know of a guy who is the youngest of 22 children and all of the kids turned out to be productive members of society.

JP’s have the resources available to them that these most families do not have and from what it seems, both parents (and their families) are very involved in their children’s daily life and one of them is at home while the other works. I don’t see the problem.

[Fug Face Maniston] @ 03/07/2007 at 11:15 am

[hey hey] Don’t you have any self respect or pride? lol

African Girl @ 03/07/2007 at 11:15 am

I tell ya…It’s like with every new thread, comes memory loss. I can’t believe some are still going on about breaking the law or AJ carrying Zee and BP carrying Shiloh (at different times) is an indication of who loves which child they love.

Roses–she is not breaking the rules. A local radio station (Chicago) this morning was discussing this. Vietnamese law/rules says (I’m paraphrasing)–couples and single men and women can adopt over the age of 25. Cohabitating cannot adopt together, but one or the other can. She is going through an American agency so all of the U.S. rules will be followed as well as the Vietnamese rules. When the child gets here, Brad can adopt it if he chooses (which of course he will). She did not talk against Madonna adopting–she said she personally would not adopt from a country where there were no legal adoption rules. Vietnam has regulations and rules and she is following them.

i think that ANON and RACHEL are jealous that Brad and Angie are not adopting them! That is why they are talking sh***t and not knowing their sh***t……..

Hiya Rachel, Seems like we are on the same page and everyone else on this blog is in lala land. A breath of fresh air indeed… But this is exactly what happens if your life has no focus and is quite bland, you tend to focus on hype and the trivialities of so-called celebrities…

44
Anon Says:

why would you care what we do with our time?

Anon and Rachel, you calling us having no lives. The thing is we BAMZS fans do and we have our priorities! But, if you’re both are here, then we’re all in the same boat! SO THINK BEFORE YOU OPEN YOUR SH****T!!!!

wtf @ they have alot of courage?

they adopted a bunch of orphans.. they didnt cure AIDS..
my neighbor adopted 11 kids through out her life.. from all ages
and i dont see this huge following.. come on..
your beloved BRANGELINA does it PARTLY for the publicity.. after all they DID have an affair…

how about a chinese girl?

isitreallythatserious? says

JP’s have the resources available to them that these most families do not have and from what it seems, both parents (and their families) are very involved in their children’s daily life and one of them is at home while the other works. I don’t see the problem.
=====================================================
ITA … my parents raised seven of us and they had problems because of financial reasons … but all of us became productive members of society anyway. With Brad and Angelina finances are not a problem, and they have said that one will be at work while the other one works, and they have already demonstrated this. So I really don’t see the problem. Besides, as Lainey’s article has mentioned (whether correct or not) I guess it’s because of the race and adoption issue. Heidi Klum is not being chastised for having three kids in three years (no one has brought up the too close together issue) and neither was Britney (and I guess it’s because their children were biological).

Something about adopting children of another race with golden boy Brad Pitt seems to touch something so deep in people that Angelina Jolie has been pilloried and condemned beyond reason.

from Lainey @ 03/07/2007 at 11:21 am

“We got pregnant with Shiloh less than a year after bringing Z home, and I don’t recall anyone saying that was too short. So is it because it’s too short, or is it because Shiloh is biological?”

Brad

isitreallythatserious? @ 03/07/2007 at 11:22 am

To Rachel and Anon

Why are you here to preach this idolize crap here? You won’t change anyone’s mind for they will do what they want to do and that’s their choice but why waste your valueable time on this subject? Maybe it’s because you two are wish others to get a life that you desperately seek? B/c it’s clear that you guys are the one idolizing here.

Again, RACHEL, you sound so freaken stupid for building this “affair” thing in your head and “publicity” thing. Talk to us when you know your facts better and when you’re ready to carry an intellectual conversation! This goes for ANON as well…….

#
44
Anon Says:

Hiya Rachel, Seems like we are on the same page and everyone else on this blog is in lala land. A breath of fresh air indeed… But this is exactly what happens if your life has no focus and is quite bland, you tend to focus on hype and the trivialities of so-called celebrities…

*******
im telling you.. these freaks needs to leave the house and meet some people.
this boderline-stalking sh!t is pretty scary

Where I live, work’s up and it’s time to go home. Peace out - I’ll leave you all to your mindless, idol worshipping drivvle. Dream on people, you’ll never be neither Brad or Angie’s personal a.s.s. wipers - THEY ARE UTTERLY CAPABLE OF DOING DOING THAT THEMSELVES!!!

If she gets pregnant again, all will be forgiven and I will stop the evil plotting with the NYP, P6, TB, ritzygal, both Huvanes and liz smith to bring her down.

But only IF…

African Girl @ 03/07/2007 at 11:25 am

44
Anon Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 11:17 am - flag comment
But this is exactly what happens if your life has no focus and is quite bland, you tend to focus on hype and the trivialities of so-called celebrities…
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ROTFLMAO….Hummm, yeah okay. If you say so….lol. So, do tell us more about a life not focused on hype and the trivialities of so-called celebrities.

Everybody hush now, we’re gonna get a lesson about the unfocusing on hype and the trivialities of so-called celebrities on a celebrity blog from someone who is not focused on celebrities.

So sheeessssh and focus! Don’t make me repeat myself…..

The next adoption will probably an African child closer to Z’s age, someone she can relate to in balance of things. Shiloh might also get another biological sibling to balance things out for her. And than the family would be complete.

[Fug Face Maniston] @ 03/07/2007 at 11:26 am

Lol.. [#54] That was a funny post. God bless you.

Anon and Rachel
I love how you accuse the other posters of having no life, of being idolizers. So hmmmm. Exactly how much time have you devoted to posting and reading the posts. Mmmmm. I’d say we are all in the same boat–reading and posting–no life!
You guys, Anon and Rachel, are so funny with your half truths and snarky comments. Thanks for the laughs. Made my morning.

Fug Face, your posts are at times rubbing the wound on the Brangelina by agreeing with the haters! sometimes, it makes me wonder about YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

4 years? he fits to Maddox
Other Mam and Dad shop Teddys. Brad and Angelina procure a child.

WOW.

Congratulate.

Parents of the year!

20/20, Rachel, Anon — quit changing your names and responding to yourself. If you don’t like to BAMZS, .. then why spend so much of your “precious” time stalking them ? you are obviously googling, searching, researching, commenting on BAMZS each and every move they make.

Admit it that you can’t stay away from all the intelligent BAMZS supporters and posters here . Admit it that you are BAMZS closet admirer. Admit it that you are inspired by what Brad and Angelina does :)

Life is just simple… we will welcome you here - just play nice :)

Hmm, again the pattern, somebody posts negative first (Anon), then agrees with “some other poster” (Rachel) and then both of them agree with each other that we BAMZS lovers have no lives, and then a third one (20/20) appears, seeming independent of the first two …. this is such a freakin’ pattern in all BAMZS threads in JustJared that you can set a clock by it.

I’m starting to be Cliniquaish in my thinking about Huvane paying people to blog. No one can be this negative all this time in all BAMZS threads, with exactly the same M.O. and saying exactly the same sh*t.

Ace Tomato @ 03/07/2007 at 11:30 am

Let’s see . . . if only I was successful enough at what I do to be a millionaire, naturally good looking, funny and interesting, lucky enough to have found someone who is also very successful, good looking and wealthy, kind and funny, lucky enough to be able to have children, big hearted enough to adopt others, creative and dedicated enough to things outside shallow celebrity life to travel the world and participate in trying to improve it on a world scale with personal commitment while also pursuing creative interests like architecture and art, while raising my family . .

I’m sorry, what’s NOT to idolize there?

Who would not want to achieve that life?

love of children @ 03/07/2007 at 11:30 am

I don’t think Angie will ever have another biological child. She prefers adopting, and there is nothing wrong with that.

isitreallythatserious? @ 03/07/2007 at 11:30 am

53
Rachel Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:22 am - flag comment
——
I did go out and met your daddy last night and he told me he’ll bring your meds today hun…..j/k!

56
African Girl Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:25 am - flag comment
—————–
LMAO and ITA! Too bad she/he left before the lesson but knowing these preachers…she/he will be back shortly!

We have to learn to continue the intelligent conversations even while we have visitors in the house who want to make the thread go otherwise.

bradlovesangie @ 03/07/2007 at 11:31 am

Now there is only one thing left to do. To get married!

44
Anon Says:

This is a celebrity blog, what do you expect ? discussing the current political or economic situation. ? Please, if this thread make you irritated , then don’t browse!

maybe, Matt’s prediction that brad and angie will get married in year 2007 is correct after all!:) would be awesome!

Angie will have another biological kid, she said so herself.

angie should get another biological child since they have such good genes!:) hehehe. if they are going to adopt next, i think it would be from India!!!!!

Mediterranean @ 03/07/2007 at 11:35 am

love of children,

Do you want to bet? I bet that she is going to get pregnant and the baby will born under the sign of Sagittarius!

I think that I am getting obsessive with the Sagittarius baby :)

ITA These are 3 in 1.

Roses #18 does not smell like a Rose. I am glad someone directed her to the old thread, where the subject she is raising has been beaten to death.

JoliePitt–
You just gotta love these folks like Anon and Rachel — they come on to a blog/board friendly to the Jolie-Pitts and waste their precious time telling us we have no life, we are stalkers etc., all the while spewing half truths. You have to wonder about them that they are so bitter and feel they have to post such nasty things about a couple they insist they can find nothing to admire about and find nothing to socially etc., redeem themselves. I always figure folks like Anon and Rachel were dumped by a boyfriend and husband and can’t move on. Or they literally have no life, so they have to try and make one by being disagreeable. Or they are just whiny, immature, cruel, mean babies. Part of the reason I like JJ’s site is for the most part people are able to have an intelligent discussion about the various entries without dealing with the attacks that you see in a Perez or FF 1st or TMZ posting. It is nice to be able to have a discussion even with folks like Rachel and Anon who try to ruin things for those folks who are happy for the couple. Let’s face it folks like Rachel and Anon are mean-spirited and most likely have no life. They stuck it out thru over 60 posts–reading each one! Hahaha for being not interested.

Casual observer @ 03/07/2007 at 11:36 am

There are many like Brad & Angelina all over, famous and not. Adopting a child from a different race or physically challanged, doing charity work (special shout out to missionaries), etc are as common as your next door neighbor, fellow church goer and peace corps volunteer. These people must be very popular now in their communities. I don’t think an adoption deserves another cover on the tabs however. It’s a bit over the top. They should hold back now on covers until the baby arrives and is pictured with his/her parents. And for the love of _, can the tabs not have _in the same issue as Brad & Angelina just once?

Mediterranean @ 03/07/2007 at 11:37 am

See you later!

I have to feed the one I love.

More power to Brad and Angie for adding another child. They love each other and they love children, so let them add to their brood. I believe Brad and Angie will have another biological child someday. I do hope so.

Am I the ONLY one that didn’t think the news of another adoption was a big deal? I mean not big enough to be on all of the tabloid covers. I think the tabloids are desperate!

i cant wait till all these “adopted” babies grow up and write TELL ALL BOOK about how Fake ANGELINA was and what a loser BRAD was :)

Anon and Rachel- A loser would be someone spending their time reading and commenting about people they don’t care about. People that read and comment about people they like would be called a fan. Now, Preparation Rach, do us all a favor and go blog about something you care about. Asshat.

75
Dancer Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:35 am - flag comment
===============================
DANCER……i think that ANON and RACHEL are still young at hearts and mind. They sound and speak like children with no facts, details and with grudges. If they are not kids, they are teenagers who got dumped by their first love, that is WHY they have to spend as much time on this blog to get their frustations out!:) LOOOOOOOOOL

Good Morning all. This was a surprise. I trust People so it’s true now. I didn’t know People had their new issues ready so early in the week.

68
bradlovesangie Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:31 am - flag comment
=====================================================

They love each other and I don’t think a piece of paper will make them love each other more. There is nothing wrong with NOT wanting to get married. If both are happy with what they have and are committed to their children. Why change anything?

Also don’t you think they feel married in all ways possible at this time? Even if their isn’t a piece of paper saying the are? So marriages should be so lucky and they do share that piece of paper!

African Girl @ 03/07/2007 at 11:40 am

please Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 10:46 am - flag comment

Thank you for this article.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

35
Mediterranean Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:12 am - flag comment
Zahara does not smile because she does not want to have wrinkles on her face. You, as a woman, have to pay attention on this kind of thing even at 2 of age.

Of course, my answer sounds so ridiculous as much as the question of why she doesn’t smile at all.

~~~~~

Lmao…no, no Medi, you are right on target. Why, If I had taken a page out of Zee’s book and started earlier, I won’t be…well let’s just say my dermatologist won’t be #1 on my speed dial.

morning susie! my work is a little better today so i am chatting away!:)

May God help Brad and Angie when these cute adorable little children all become moody, emotional, out of control teenagers…one after another.

Thanks for the new thread j@red!!

18
roses Says:
****
Pls go read the last thread and you’ll find a lot of data.

70
JoliePitt Says:
******
truly awesome if his prediction comes true

[Fug Face Maniston] @ 03/07/2007 at 11:41 am

[JoliePitt] You picking on me again? Lmaoo

Just because I [Like] Brad and Angelina doesn’t mean I cant Laugh at a Funny post.

I haven’t agreed with any post insulting Brangelina, I agreed with a post pointlessly pointing out “Idolization”

Please don’t pick on me [JP] I’m still crying from the last font smack down you gave me. Lol

just saying @ 03/07/2007 at 11:41 am

Too many too soon.

Angelina has said that they want to adopt first than have a second bio kid. I’m thinking since the new kid will be older it will be easier for her to handle a baby when the time is right.

21
I do care because Jen do like children Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:01 am - flag comment
Jennifer chose her life no one make that choice for her, if she wanted Brad, she had to make comprise.
In relationships you don’t suppose to see yourself only, you have to see your husband or partner too. Jennifer is so selfish she refused to have a baby with Brad. Don’t blame Brad or Angie for that. It’s time to move on, let Jolie- Pitt family live their life.

=================
ITA. Maniston underestimate the power of a child in a man’s heart. but the real issue, she never want a kid but keep lying to the public and her husband. after 2 years of separation, Brad gonna have 4 kids, she still zero kid with a biological clock slowly ticking away.

to all haters and basically a MANISTON LOVERS,just go away and wait for another sensational news about chinniston,but by the way it seems nobody paying attention to her now!i could see another

why doesn’t US weekly let us know how Billy Bob Thortan and Gwyneth Paltrow are coping with the new baby news as well? Lmao!

isitreallythatserious? @ 03/07/2007 at 11:44 am

79
420 Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:37 am - flag comment

————

ITA! I don’t think that Brad and Angelina adopting again is that big of news considering that both have said over and over again that they want a lot of children and to raise them while they are young.

With the rags of course they are desperate but they also know that Brad and Angelina on the cover will get them big their rags off racks. So any story they can put on the cover about them …they will.

male. check! vietnam. check! shortly after shiloh’s 1st birthday. possible check! it’s nice to see predictions i made months ago actually happen. thanks brad & angie :)

next up…a little girl from haiti, late 2008.

to all haters and basically a MANISTON LOVERS,just go away and wait for another sensational news about chinniston,but by the way it seems nobody paying attention to her now!i could see another MEG RYAN PHENOMENON!.GETTING OLD,UGLIER,MORE BORING THAN EVER AND NO MOVIES!!!!pls producers give chinniston some jobs!!!!all her fans are getting wild now!

just saying @ 03/07/2007 at 11:44 am

Marriage would make adoptions easier. That’s all.

87
clark Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:41 am - flag comment
May God help Brad and Angie when these cute adorable little children all become moody, emotional, out of control teenagers…one after another.
====================================================
Hmmm, so what if they are teenagers one after another. They outgrow that phase anyway. It’s not like Angie does not know what being a rebellious teen-ager is — she was a major one herself. In fact, she already addressed this during her Vogue interview.

I saw or read an interview with Jennifer Aniston, when she was in Australia promoting The Breakup, in that interview she said she does not beleive in compromising, I am going to look for the exact quote, That is why she is where she is today. Maybe she is happy this way. But more and more people even die hard fans are realizing that children was an obvious issue. I wonder what stunt she is going too pull next.

89
[Fug Face Maniston] Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:41 am - flag comment
[JoliePitt] You picking on me again? Lmaoo

Just because I [Like] Brad and Angelina doesn’t mean I cant Laugh at a Funny post.

I haven’t agreed with any post insulting Brangelina, I agreed with a post pointlessly pointing out “Idolization”

Please don’t pick on me [JP] I’m still crying from the last font smack down you gave me. Lol
===================================
LMAO, but i am keeping my eyes on ya!:)

prediction @ 03/07/2007 at 11:47 am

Next to the next child: a four year old girl from another African country. (for Z)

90
just saying Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:41 am - flag comment

=====================================================

Would you say the same thing if all of them were bio-children? I don’t think so. As they say to each it’s own.

And I happen to be from a family of nine children and we all turn out great are very close and doing already when it comes to our careers.

100
sad Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:45 am - flag comment
I saw or read an interview with Jennifer Aniston, when she was in Australia promoting The Breakup, in that interview she said she does not beleive in compromising, I am going to look for the exact quote, That is why she is where she is today. Maybe she is happy this way. But more and more people even die hard fans are realizing that children was an obvious issue. I wonder what stunt she is going too pull next.
====================================
Maniston doesn’t believe in compromising????!!!! She definitely deserves to be alone all her life in that case! I mean, life is about compromising!

Why are you bringing up Aniston here? She is not relevant.

JoliePitt- I see you have your a**kicking Charlie’s Angels gear on today. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Medi- what’s wrong wtih a scorpio?????They still can bring a baby in under that sign(mine). lol :lol:

#7
please-
thank you for the news article on the killing of the soldiers in Sudan. It is so sad for them and their famililies and now we see why AJ could not go to Darfur last week. :cry:

To cotinue to talk about Brad and __ is a way her fans want to waste BAMZS fans’ time. VV is her X, why are her fans not talking about him? Talking about __ is a continued distraction.

diamondhead @ 03/07/2007 at 11:49 am

From Lainey:

[...]I’m told he was on the phone some time late last week and he mentioned something to the effect of (my source paraphrased) – “we got pregnant with Shiloh less than a year after bringing Z home[...]

Yeah, I’d say it was less than a year! Jolie got pregnant barely 2 months after bringing Zahara home! And they had been together barely 5 months when Jolie got knocked up - that’s the hazy honeymoon faze, everyone knows the hazy crazy honeymoon faze lasts about 2 years. The longest relationship Jolie has had was with BBT, just over 2 years. She’s always moved on after the honeymoon faze is over - it’s been almost 2 years with Pitt…and they do have kids, hopefully it will last.

sweet gherkins! who the hell gives a crap about how traniston feels?!! she is so far removed from this situation she may as well not even be on planet earth anymore!

African Girl @ 03/07/2007 at 11:50 am

96
gitane Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:44 am - flag comment
male. check! vietnam. check! shortly after shiloh’s 1st birthday. possible check! it’s nice to see predictions i made months ago actually happen. thanks brad & angie

next up…a little girl from haiti, late 2008
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ha ha…we’re gonna change your name to Madame G - The All seeing and Knowing one. Say, madame G, can you tell us when these Fanistons are gonna move on…if they’ll ever move on?

97
cookie Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:44 am - flag comment
to all haters and basically a MANISTON LOVERS,just go away and wait for another sensational news about chinniston,but by the way it seems nobody paying attention to her now!i could see another MEG RYAN PHENOMENON!.GETTING OLD,UGLIER,MORE BORING THAN EVER AND NO MOVIES!!!!pls producers give chinniston some jobs!!!!all her fans are getting wild now!

====================================================
Oh, now, cookie, don’t insult Meg Ryan. I used to like her — besides, big difference between Maniston and Meggie == Meg was cute and had talent, and her movies once upon a time made money. It was only when she hooked up with Russell Crowe and dumped her husband that people lost interest in her.

Jane Public @ 03/07/2007 at 11:52 am

#
18
roses Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 10:59 am - flag comment

She said that about Madona adopting from a place that does not allow adoption and she is break their rules by trying to adopt as a single parent since its not allowed to let two people living together to adopt there.
****************************
B*tch, learn the facts before you open your ignorant mouth.
This is the facts: You can adopt in Vietnam if you are single or married, it DOES NOT say you cannot have a man/woman in your life.

COVER STORY: Brad & Angelina Prepare for Baby No. 4
WEDNESDAY MARCH 07, 2007 09:55 AM EST

By Jason Lynch and Mary Green

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s decision to add a child from Vietnam to their family has been a long time coming.

For months the couple have been preparing to find a sibling for Maddox, 5, Zahara, 2, and 10-month-old Shiloh, a “process that began shortly after Shiloh was born [in May],” a source tells PEOPLE in its new issue.

It wasn’t until March 2 that a Vietnamese official revealed that Jolie, 31, had filed preliminary papers to adopt a child – according to one adoption worker, “a boy between the ages of 3 and 5.”

(Vu Duc Long, the head of the country’s international adoption department, told the Associated Press on Wednesday that the boy is between the ages of 3 and 4 and from the Tam Binh orphanage on the outskirts of Ho Chi Minh City.)

But the source close to Jolie says there are still a few more steps before welcoming a new family member. “It’s wonderful that people are excited about it,” says the friend. “But she is only at the beginning of a very comprehensive and detailed process.”

Why Vietnam? Jolie has traveled extensively in Southeast Asia and has visited the country at least twice. After adopting Maddox from Cambodia and Zahara from Ethiopia, she mused to Good Morning America in December that it might be a good idea to “balance the races so there’s another African person in the house for Z [and] another Asian person in the house for Mad.”

As they navigate adoption red tape, the family of five has been happily settled in New Orleans since January, where Pitt, 43, has been filming the romance The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.

Locals frequently spot them strolling through the French Quarter, buying baby clothes (a “Dirty South” T-shirt for Maddox, a black dress for Zahara and a hot-pink onesie for Shiloh) and dining out with Button costar Cate Blanchett.

Soon they’ll return home to L.A., where Pitt will resume filming. Jolie, meanwhile, continues to speak out about the atrocities in Darfur as she awaits the phone call that will enable her to officially add to her brood. The good news can’t come soon enough. “I just want more kids,” she told PEOPLE recently. “I’m having a great time.”

For more on this story, including details on Brad and Angelina’s visit to the orphanage and Angelina’s mission to Darfur, pick up this week’s PEOPLE, on newsstands Friday.

just saying @ 03/07/2007 at 11:52 am

Even if biological, still would be TOO MANY TOO SOON. Sorry!

She just blasted Madonna a couple months ago and is now up to the same trickery.

98
just saying Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:44 am - flag comment

=====================================================

I never got the impression that either Angie nor Brad was about making things easier.

Seems to me it’s all about what others want. It’s their lives and they have the right to do whatever they want as long as it is within the law.

Also, Angie did address the issue in her Vogue article.

#115 just saying Says:
++++++++++++++++++

ah yes, and we’ll all just jump on your bandwagon since you are indeed the expert on child-rearing and parenting…..

how many children do you have?

111
Rachel Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:50 am - flag comment
they are trying to win over the public
with all these orphans.
like who cares
====================================================
You’ve been SAYING OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN that you don’t care. I believe Shakespeare was right in saying in Hamlet “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”

100
sad Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:45 am - flag comment
I saw or read an interview with Jennifer Aniston, when she was in Australia promoting The Breakup, in that interview she said she does not beleive in compromising, I am going to look for the exact quote, That is why she is where she is today. Maybe she is happy this way. But more and more people even die hard fans are realizing that children was an obvious issue. I wonder what stunt she is going too pull next.

+++++++++++

ITA. Its so obvious, Brad from 0 kid with that hag for 7yrs to 4 kids within 2 yrs. with Angelina. That’s so obvious kid was one of theissue, Brad was gentleman enouch not to uncover her fraud. and she had the guts to let her friend said its Brad who do not want kid. ? pleaese.

to: sophie @ 03/07/2007 at 11:57 am

How many do you have?

God Bless this family!! I love the way that they are so compassionate and their love for everyone around the world.. Very inspiring.. I wish them all the best.. I love this family!!

Jane Public @ 03/07/2007 at 11:58 am

9
20/20 Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 11:00 am - flag comment

People’s cover and US Weekly’s cover say it all:

Brad loves Shiloh

Angie Loves Zee (& Mad & Viet Boy and every other godforsaken urchin that will come along)
*************************
Now, this is the most ignorant of all statements so far, today.

gitane Says:

next up…a little girl from haiti, late 2008.
——————————————-

no way! too dark. and if they think they have it bad now with z’s hair…

Casual observer @ 03/07/2007 at 12:00 pm

94
420 Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:44 am - flag comment
why doesn’t US weekly let us know how Billy Bob Thortan and Gwyneth Paltrow are coping with the new baby news as well? Lmao!

Thank You. If they have to drag _out from the attic they they should do the same with Billy Bob, moth balls and all. I think the children’s hoopla will die down soon and shift to Dannielynn. They had a show on the paps chasing Dannielynn Smith. It was worse than chasing Angelina. Should that baby inherit the half billion dollars expected, or even the minimum 100 million dollars, we won’t ever hear about any other celebrity baby ever again. She is a Texas Oil Tycoon’s heiress, kind of like Christina Onassis. Of course we will always have JJ to get the latest info on the Jolie-Pitt kids.

Ciao.

more than you for sure! ’cause only childless people would make judgemental statements about the parenting style of felow parents

116
Chase Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:54 am - flag comment
She just blasted Madonna a couple months ago and is now up to the same trickery.

What’s with all these people who post without thinking or reading up on the matter? Chase, put down the tabs and get your facts straight. Go to the earlier Brad thread and read up on Lylian’s post where she so adroitly rebutted each and every one of TBeams accusations, especially the one about adopting single, and about the Madonna issue. I would have brought it over but it’s a little long.

Just saying–
You must come from a small family or a large one that didn’t get along. Many of us are from large families and we turned out all right and are close to our siblings. What about folks who have twins, triplets, quads and more? Especially those to whom it was a biological fate rather than an engineered one (i.e. invitro or something). They have the resources and the love to have a large family. In fact, didn’t Brad come from one? Four kids? Can’t remember. I think, from what I see in the media and hear from their interviews with regards to their philosophies, that they are doing a wonderful job. Anyone who has the love, patience and resources to adopt a child and love them as your own-kudos to them! I don’t care if they are Meg Ryan, Mia Farrow, etc. I do have doubts about Sharon Stone’s parenting skills, but hey this is a Brad and Angie blog.

diamondhead @ 03/07/2007 at 12:01 pm

76
Casual observer Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:36 am - flag comment
There are many like Brad & Angelina all over, famous and not. Adopting a child from a different race or physically challanged, doing charity work (special shout out to missionaries), etc are as common as your next door neighbor, fellow church goer and peace corps volunteer. These people must be very popular now in their communities. I don’t think an adoption deserves another cover on the tabs however. It’s a bit over the top. They should hold back now on covers until the baby arrives and is pictured with his/her parents. And for the love of _, can the tabs not have _in the same issue as Brad & Angelina just once?

____________________________________________________________________

So true. Then there’s also the point that Pitt has hundreds of millions of dollars. It’s a fact they already have 5 nannies - then there’s the house cleaners to clean up after the kids, the chefs to feed the kids…..it’s not in any way, shape, or form, any kind of “sacrifice” and it doesn’t make them “soulful”- as some people make it out to be. Who are the real heros? And why are they always announing every time they pee? Many celebrities adopt quietly and go about their lives quietly.

It’s the parents who work their bag off to put food on the table, cloths on the backs of kids who are the real heros. The real heros go unrecognized because of blogs like this glorifying and idolizing 2 celebrities with hundreds of millions of dollars.

[Fug Face Maniston] @ 03/07/2007 at 12:03 pm

111
Rachel Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 11:50 am - flag comment

ur still here? [lmao] I think ur the one who needs a life…

isitreallythatserious? @ 03/07/2007 at 12:04 pm

125
20/20 Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:59 am - flag comment
OMG….did you really just post that? A true sign of ignorance here yet I’m the one with the issues huh?

————————————————

ppl have had back to back to back kids before and they have done just fine with less resource and family involvement. The JP’s have all that and more so why can’t they adopted and birth as many children as they want? To me, they seem to have done a great job so far (b/c all three children look health from pics) and have said many times over that they spend individual time with each child to make them feel just as speacial as the others.

They are really going to have to MAKE time for each other now that they’re going to have four little ones to give all their attention to.

110 African Girl

:lol: my friends don’t call me the “all-knowing gypsy” for nothin’! as for predictions for the fanistons, i’m afraid i can’t help you there. i can only predict the course of people who have brains.

as for brad and angie having too many kids too soon, that’s not anybody’s call to make but theirs. they know how much they can handle and they’ve already said they want to have all their kids while they’re still young. i actually think adopting a toddler is very smart of them. not only will madd have a little brother close to his age, this child isn’t in diapers and will be ready for school in a year or less. so next year the jolie-pitts will have two sons in school, zee will be potty-trained (if the little diva decides that what she wants to be) and shiloh will be walking. then they can bring another infant into the family.

They have already outgrown the Malibu beach house now for sure.

[Fug Face Maniston] @ 03/07/2007 at 12:07 pm

Not my clone again. using other peoples names to post under is lame.

I really think they want to hurry and complete their family soon which means she will be pregnant pretty soon. Brad is in his 40s and wants a gang of kids before 5O.. maybe that is why they’re in a rush?

Why are people discussing the x again. Totally irrelevant!!!! Keep this thread clean, no more x.

Worth to repost @ 03/07/2007 at 12:10 pm

924
Brangelinafan Says:

March 6th, 2007 at 9:17 pm - flag comment
587
coyote27 Says:
March 6th, 2007 at 10:30 am - flag comment

Lylian: I assume you posted the comments below and I’m going to respond to them one by one as a lawyer who has practised extensively in Asia.

___________

Coyote: That’s right, Jolie probably wouldn’t have known initially but soon found out BECAUSE THERE WAS A SCANDAL ABOUT IT. THEY BLOCKED MADDOXs’ VISA FOR A FEW DAYS/WEEKS because they didn’t know if the adoption was legal. Why is it so difficult for you to just look it up? It’s all there.

Lylian: I did look it up and so I know that angleina was investigated on her adoption of Maddox. that’s how I know that she was not guilty of anything other then using what was then the largest adoption agency in America for adoptions in Cambodia.

Coyote: So, the point is, Jolie was involved with a scandal because she didn’t know - then she turns around and accuses Madonna saying “she should have known” - that’s the point, the hypocricy. Madonna didn’t know and Jolie didn’t know. But Jolie, as usual, engages in the hypocrisy and is so righteous about it when the exact same thing happened to her!!

LYlian: Cambodia was on the list of single parent adoptions back in 2000 and 2001, before the US closed its doors to adoption there because of the dubious activities of the adoption agency.

On the other hand Madonna knew that:

(a) Malawi was NOT ON the List allowing for International adoption

(b) MADONNA HERSELF SAID IN AN INTERVIEW THAT THE LAWS FOR INTERNATIONAL ADOPTION DID NOT EXIST SO SHE AND HER ADOPTION LAWYERS JUST DID WHAT THEY COULD AND MADE IT UP AS THEY WENT A LONG.

(c) the Malawian NGOs challenging madonna’s adoption actually claims the laws have been BREACHED. I believe one of the claims was that there is minimum residency requirement before someone can adopt a malawian child.

If in fact, Malawi had this minimum residency requiremnet and Madonna did not satisfy the law, then her adoption IS ILLEGAL.

If however, it was as Madonna claimed, the laws were simply unclear, then it would be a different matter. If the laws of adoption in malawi were not clear, then Madonna got approvals from various agencies, which is where the allegations of undue influence, preferential treatment to a woman who just donated US$1.0 million to orphanages in Malawi came in. That in itself could be ILLEGAL too, depending on what was given, what was promised, for the approvals to be given. Depending on what you gave, what you promised, you can be guilty of bribery.

So, I follow the Malawian NGO’s case with interest. Are they alleging a straight out illegality or are they alleging improper conduct on the part of Madonna or what? I’m not clear and neither are you.

I will say that what ever the case, I’m happy that little David was adopted, got out of the orphanage and appears to be much loved in the Ritchie home.

As for Angelina’s alleged adoption in Vietnam, Vietnamese law appears to allow single parents to adopt and married couple to adopt. However, the law does not say anything about UNMARRIED COUPLES ADOPTING. You could argue that the law is unclear. Or you could argue that Vietnamese law is very clear: Single People may adopt.

Under US law, Angelina is not married which means, she is a single woman. Under US laws of intestacy, Angelina will NOT BE REGARDED AS BRAD’S WIFE SHOULD BRAD DIE SUDDENLY WITHOUT A WILL. Under US laws, Angelina may not even be entitled to company health benefits which are extended to the legally married spouse because she isn’t legally married. In her position as a partner for a period of 18 months, it is not even clear if the presumption of joint tenancy applies to Angelina and Brad in respect of their family home in NO. If you were legally married and hold the family home in joint names with your husband, the law presumes, at least in my part of the world and probably in the US too, that you and your husband hold the family home as joint tenants and not tenants in common. I won’t explain what that means but trust me, it has significant legal importance.

So, for Angelina to apply as a single woman, in Vietnam, is not illegal. it is very clear to me that Angelina is a single woman. She is not Brad’s legally wedded wife and lacks many rights under US law. Why do you think that homosexuals want the right to marry? Aside from the desire to be accepted as a member of society, the law gives different rights to legally married couples, which they don’t to cohabitating couples.

If the Vietnamese authorities elect to treat Angelina as a single woman they certainly are justified doing so. And if Angelina’s did not bribe, did not make promises to donate funds to the country’s orphanages, but applied as any other single parent, the vietnamese authorities can interpret their own laws as they see fit.

Coyote: Regardless if Jolie knew about it, which she didn’t, she was still involved with the scandal and THAT 2002 SCANDAL CAUSED CAMBODIA IS CLOSE IT’S DOORS TO ADOPTION.

Lylian: The scandal of cambodia was not of Angelina’s making. She didn’t cause the adoption agency to do illegal things. The authorities did not investigate the seattle adoption agency because of Angelina’s adoption of Maddox. If you say that Angleina’s adoption caused the scandal, then so did the hundreds, may be thousands of cambodian adoptions which were made through this same agency. Surely, you are not saying that as a celebrity, Angleina should be made responsible for the scandal but not the other adoptees coz they aren’t celebrities.

On the other hand, Madonna’s scandal is ENTIRELY OF HER OWN MAKING. She chose to (in her own words) ” make it up as she went along”. As a lawyer, I can only say, she was badly advised. To risk a matter as important as adoption, regardless of whether you are a celebrity or not, by making up the rules as you go along, is just plain DUMB.

If you have done your homework and read things without the glasses of a bigot, you would see the difference in both cases. But as I’ve said before, you cannot expect a bigot to be fair.

—-

God bless you! Thank you for dealing with this troll in a positive manner. You are so much more better than me. That post is a kepper.

was just saying @ 03/07/2007 at 12:11 pm

I guess four kids in two years is not too many too soon. You guys are right. I am wrong.

arctic cat @ 03/07/2007 at 12:11 pm

92
+++ Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:42 am - flag comment
21
I do care because Jen do like children Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:01 am - flag comment
Jennifer chose her life no one make that choice for her, if she wanted Brad, she had to make comprise.
In relationships you don’t suppose to see yourself only, you have to see your husband or partner too. Jennifer is so selfish she refused to have a baby with Brad. Don’t blame Brad or Angie for that. It’s time to move on, let Jolie- Pitt family live their life.

=================
ITA. Maniston underestimate the power of a child in a man’s heart. but the real issue, she never want a kid but keep lying to the public and her husband. after 2 years of separation, Brad gonna have 4 kids, she still zero kid with a biological clock slowly ticking away.

________________

Plus, Aniston is NEVER mother material. Look at her, smoking up the chimney, tanning, plastics etc. She is the me me me child-woman. Brad said, with children, ,”….children are first, and you are second…”.

Jen is better off getting more dogs. Her children will suffer if ever she becomes a mother.

Angelina is letting Brad make up for lost time.

[Fug Face Maniston] @ 03/07/2007 at 12:14 pm

Oh no.. [Not again] just mentioned the [x] again.. Oops, So did I.
When will it end. [Never]

Isabelle II (Post #27)

Good morning! I haven’t seen you post in a while! You been busy (or just lurking, like me?)

US Magazine @ 03/07/2007 at 12:15 pm

Aniston quit smoking.

[Fug Face Maniston] @ 03/07/2007 at 12:15 pm

lol

African Girl @ 03/07/2007 at 12:16 pm

132
gitane Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:05 pm - flag comment
110 African Girl

my friends don’t call me the “all-knowing gypsy” for nothin’! as for predictions for the fanistons, i’m afraid i can’t help you there. i can only predict the course of people who have brains.

~~~~~~~~~~~

Right, right….No brain, no brainwave to read. Oh all knowing Gypsy lady, you one in a million. Say, with your powers and my voodoo background, I’m sure we can come up with ano alternative for these pesky l’il buggers.

130
diamondhead Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:01 pm - flag comment

Yes, yes , we know they are several unknown, celebrities adopting….. blah, blah, blah. but all these persons are not famous and would not help the magazines sale. I ‘m sure Brad and Angie wouln’t like this kind of attention either. cos this will certainly lead to all these naysayers backlash just like Madonna. I knew Meg Ryan, Sarrah Stone and a few other’s celebrity adopting news were also released in the People’s and a few tab. but it didn’t have so much buzz because they were not as big as Brad and Angie or Madonna.
I would prefer this kind of healthy news than Brit showing her pantyless genitalia, Paris and Lyndsay drunk, all night party, which actors are dating , divorcing, tanning…… afterall, People’s and Us were celebrity mag, what else do they report ? but hottest couple in HW.

I think people are getting things mixed up or maybe not. It seems like some think that adopting is charity and commend Angelina & Brad for doing so. The thinking seems like if they are “not like them” it has to be charity. How could you possibly love another child from a different race unless it was charity? Some “applaud” them for doing charity work. Adopting, if I’m not mistaken means that you want a child. Does wanting a child make you a humanitarian? Or it it charity only if you adopt from an orphanage? People are confusing the two. It’s simple, they are adopting because they love children and they want another child. They do humanitarian work, because it’s fulfilling and want to make a difference in the world. I just feel uneasy that some actually think the adoptions are just another form of charity.

B&A are Lame @ 03/07/2007 at 12:18 pm

God they’re lame…..poor Shiloh. Yet another child for her mother to resent and hate her for because this child is more deserving of her “feeling” than Shiloh is.

Newsflash, Angelina…ALL of your children are now privileged, including Maddox and Zahara. They’re not going to remember their hardship they suffered before they were 7 months old.

They’re so not concerned about Shiloh, AT ALL. That poor kid doesn’t even get a full year of her mother’s attention.

isitreallythatserious? @ 03/07/2007 at 12:19 pm

128
diamondhead Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:01 pm - flag comment
———
Well why don’t you go start a blog that recognizes these real heroes while we post on a celeb blogs about celebs. I get your point but honestly….this is not the place to discuss that.

To the too soon camp….four kids in two years….yes but all four of the kids are not under the age of two. Z is two, Shi will be one in May and Mad will be six in August(I think). A four year old won’t be that much of an issue for them to handle when he is adopted by the JP’s.

Jane Public @ 03/07/2007 at 12:20 pm

Dancer Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 11:15 am - flag comment

Cohabitating cannot adopt together, but one or the other can.
****************************
Exactly

143
US Magazine Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:15 pm - flag comment
Aniston quit smoking
========
Really ? but she was spotted recently at the Oscar afterparty or pre-party smoking, drinking with her goddes circle.

How many kids does Rosie have?

145 African Girl

voodoo? now we’re talking! i’ve dabbled a little in charms and hexes meself. however, i can’t think of any root we could put on them to make them worse off than they are. if anything, our curses would be an improvement.

to : please @ 03/07/2007 at 12:23 pm

Rosie has four kids.

To Us Weekly @ 03/07/2007 at 12:24 pm

Jen was spotted SMOKING and drinking wine with Sheryl Crow and friends in LA attending a B-day dinner.This was reported in US Weekly 2 weeks ago!

isitreallythatserious? @ 03/07/2007 at 12:25 pm

148
B&A are Lame Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:18 pm - flag comment
xxxxxxxxxx

Rachel, Yen, Anon….is that you? I guess you couldn’t stay away from us loons for you only been gone all of ten minutes. WB!

grettings from Holland

Hi guys, good morning, evening, thanks jared for the new thread, and congratulation to Bragelina for the new kids in their family,
guys, i just came from the bragellinaespanol.blogs wheres lamiga (former vid in Youtube) she has alot videos of Bragelina, a nice blog but with spanish. anyway, they just have a thread that while Angie was in Darfur, Brad , Holly and Bill Pitt went to The Audobon Aquarium of the Americas in NOLA, they said Brad hold Shiloh, Holllyl with Maddox and Bill Pitt carried Zahara, and they have picturs too, but it tooks by visitors of that park, it seems they have a good days bbl
time 18.25

What is all this to do about Angelina being the one who filed? What country lets a man adopt without being married? I guess only Western countries only because even gay couples (men) have adopted.

143
US Magazine Says

I’m sure she’s gonna smoke like a chimney again after seeing all these blissful picture of Brad and his new family.

piper, with a low @ 03/07/2007 at 12:28 pm

Wow… these haters are such drama queens.

Trying to make a dramatic exit when you know that they’re just lurking, waiting for someone to address them directly.

Whatever!

Some people don’t grasp the concept of ‘wasting time’. The very fact that these folks spent so much time pontificating about people they don’t know, don’t like, among people they don’t respect say more about them than anything. Yes, functional human beings have to do things that they don’t like– coming to a BAMZS thread on Just Jared’s website isn’t one of them.

So get a clue, ‘wipes!

Mediterranean @ 03/07/2007 at 12:29 pm

to JoliePitt and African Girl,

Frankly, I had enough of this ridiculous question for sometime.

Oh my God, I have already been too late to forbid my daughter to smile. Damn! She love to laugh. Damn, damn, damn!

Jane Public @ 03/07/2007 at 12:30 pm

87
clark Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:41 am - flag comment
May God help Brad and Angie when these cute adorable little children all become moody, emotional, out of control teenagers…one after another.
*********************
Many people have raised mulitple teenagers, and got through it in one piece.

Gitane
Oh…Kindred spirits!!! I know, usually, you want to render your enemies senseless but these ones already are. Okay, how about we blind them to everything JP?

Mediterranean @ 03/07/2007 at 12:31 pm

Jen quits smoking OF WHAT? There are many things have been smoked by her, so which one, she quits?

The biggest problem with x is too much talking with no action . Talk is cheap .. but getting off your butt and actually making things happen in life is the challenge ! Making Life work for you and loved one is never easy. It takes committment, effort , compromise .

I believed most of BAMZS posters, majority who are married with kids do knows what it takes to make a marriage work and and the effort to raise a family as a unit.

Living a life as a single or life of committed relationship but separate individual lifestyle is totally different from being a cohesive family unit and doing things together , compromising , understanding and making things work as a committed family unit. The later takes effort on both parties.. great effort !

The way that Brad and Angelina are doing everything together shows their committment to each other and to the family. By adding another child to the family shows their intense commitment to raise a family together for a very long haul. They are doing what they both enjoy intensely, a fulfilled relationship with their love for parenting and children. What else can you say about them except Beautiful Hearts Beautiful Family !

Impeach Bush, NOW @ 03/07/2007 at 12:32 pm

87
clark Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:41 am - flag comment
May God help Brad and Angie when these cute adorable little children all become moody, emotional, out of control teenagers…one after another.
********************************
I raised four teenagers, and NONE of them were out of control. You apparently have a lot to learn.

I have a subscription to People magazine. So, I should see soon what the full article says. I am not surprised that they are adding to their family now. I would not be surprised if they wait less than year to have another baby either a biological or through adoption.

157
hanna Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:26 pm - flag comment

Thank you for this news. The Senior Pitts seems to be enjoying their role as the grandparents of Brad and Angie kids.

i am glad for them but i am just wondering how come they can adopt so fast since thousands of parents have been waiting for years …

US Magazine @ 03/07/2007 at 12:35 pm

Sources tell US that the former Mr. Brad Pitt isn’t batting an eye over the adoption announcement. “She doesn’t care what Brad and Angelina do anymore. She has moved on” a source close to the actress tells US.
(70% of the people polled by the magazine said “Yes” Jen has moved on)

[Fug Face Maniston] @ 03/07/2007 at 12:39 pm

Lol @ [Ghana girl]

Mediterranean @ 03/07/2007 at 12:42 pm

Yes, she has moved on, but still backward.

It’s a great news!!!

I like this happy family is expanding!!!

Angie said they want to rise children while they are still young and I think they plan to have another bio-baby in a year or two, so this is the right moment for new adoption!!!

They are such a wonderful family!!!

170
US Magazine Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:35 pm - flag comment
Sources tell US that the former Mr. Brad Pitt isn’t batting an eye over the adoption announcement. “She doesn’t care what Brad and Angelina do anymore. She has moved on” a source close to the actress tells US.
(70% of the people polled by the magazine said “Yes” Jen has moved on

oh she cares…

lamassabrosona @ 03/07/2007 at 12:43 pm

Thank you Jared…. I love love love the whole family…. :)

It is a new great video of the perfect couple in YouTube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQJGf-zsFIg

:)

163 AfricanGirl

if we do that we’ll end their suffering. i, for one, enjoy the thought of their agony. and, if we blind them to all things jolie-pitt, how will they ever learn about what’s going on in the world? they may not understand it, but they are getting an education.

172
Mediterranean Says:
********
LOL

Isabelle II @ 03/07/2007 at 12:45 pm

142
briseis Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:15 pm - flag comment
Isabelle II (Post #27)

Good morning! I haven’t seen you post in a while! You been busy (or just lurking, like me?)
========================

HEY GIRL!! the answer is YES and YES
Some times I just get so wiped out reading the back and forth S**T I think I resorted to lurking during the HUGE feud between Cliniqua and another regular. I swear it took days to ge right. then someone started that people shoudn’t have private convos[sorry]. And this was all comming from the fans here, when the haters but in I JUST HAD GET OUT for a while.

I heard that ___was a an oscar pre-party. But it’s like if I don’r see her photo there I’m not feeling it. They had Oprah’s face everywhere

Oh well thanks for the greet!

hanna- thank you for posting about the spanish blog. Did you see a picture of Mad there? Because lamey said someone saw he and AJ on a flight and I was wondering if it was true.

Mediterranean @ 03/07/2007 at 12:45 pm

hugubdfbbfhjkkkkfkkkkjkkkkkkfkgkkkgkgkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkrkrkrekrmeiieoeoeoepoeoorioerriporeoioooooeropnreopneroiriii

164
Mediterranean Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:31 pm - flag comment
Jen quits smoking OF WHAT? There are many things have been smoked by her, so which one, she quits?
========================================
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Mediterraneanç_i(uij @ 03/07/2007 at 12:46 pm

uirjurjrkrjtutrurt

Mrs. Smith @ 03/07/2007 at 12:47 pm

148/B&A are lame….Another candidate for Jared’s Hall of Shame -Most Stupid Posts category. Please take a bow. We await your next noteworthy post with bated breaths, as soon as you take a break from reading the National Enquirer.

It really galls me how these bloody rags are constantly wondering about ‘how ____is coping,’ whenever there is an announcement from Brad and Angie re pregnancy, adoption. By the time they are on their 6th child, about 7 years after the divorce, I suppose they will still be wondering about her coping capabilities! UGGGH!

Thanks for the new thread Jared.

what happened to the link..

Isabelle II:

I know what you mean about that huge feud and the comment about private convos (but what can you do if for example right now I wanted to shout out to you and there’s no other way to do it except JustJared?)

Anyway, glad to see you’re posting again and just going on with your love for the Jolie-Pitts (like me)!

But US mag poll is NOT a scientic poll.

Let me tell you. For testing the fairness of their poll, I once clicked, clicked, and clicked. In one hour, I put in 4000 votes. You dont even have to wait for the next clicking.

All you need is a fast computer to refresh and a hi speed connection. Try it yourself !!!!!

Jen fans are famous for over-active fingers.

pondering..... @ 03/07/2007 at 12:52 pm

hindsight looking back and recalling the news,

- golden globes was on 1/16/07 -shortly thereafter Angie left for Vietnam - so this was probably the date of their 1st filing

- around 1/20/07 .. news and tabs started reporting about x planning to adopt 2 kids in US. These made great headline for about a week or so before x publicist refute the news.

is that coincident or what as far as x always having some sort of similar news around time when some major happenings with B&A’s life

2 posts gone..what is going on?! grr

Lainey's Post @ 03/07/2007 at 12:55 pm

Nothing new in terms of content: it’s a boy, around 4 years old, they began the procedure months ago, could be a while yet before they bring him home – all things you already know. What’s new from my sources is that the couple is already prepared and bracing for backlash from critics over suspicion into the adoption process which is why they supposedly have given the green light to Vietnamese officials to reveal as much information as possible without compromising crucial information to encourage transparency and avoid another “Malawi”. Scrutiny into this aspect of the situation is not a concern.

However, what does irritate them are the questions about the timeline and why the adoption so soon after the Chosen One’s arrival. Rumour has it Brad sees this not as a challenge about their parenting but a challenge about race. I’m told he was on the phone some time late last week and he mentioned something to the effect of (my source paraphrased) – “we got pregnant with Shiloh less than a year after bringing Z home and I don’t recall anyone saying that was too short. So is it because it’s too short or is it because Shiloh is biological?”

Also – Maddox is rumoured to have traveled with Angelina last week with a quick stop in Vietnam. Have received multiple reports of sightings on a Cathay Pacific flight, Angie and Madd were in Business Class, very low key, Maddox was sleepy but apparently still full of personality and hugged his mom a lot, they were on their way to Hong Kong presumably connecting to LA back to NOLA.

Will keep you posted.

good news jj.i will buy people mag because they always know the facts.i am so happy for them especially mad,who will have a little brother to play with.

Maddox was at the park with Grandma and Holly.

Medi- is your daughter trying to post? :lol:

Lainey's Post @ 03/07/2007 at 12:59 pm

Nothing new in terms of content: it’s a boy, around 4 years old, they began the procedure months ago, could be a while yet before they bring him home – all things you already know. What’s new from my sources is that the couple is already prepared and bracing for backlash from critics over suspicion into the adoption process which is why they supposedly have given the green light to Vietnamese officials to reveal as much information as possible without compromising crucial information to encourage transparency and avoid another “Malawi”. Scrutiny into this aspect of the situation is not a concern.

However, what does irritate them are the questions about the timeline and why the adoption so soon after the Chosen One’s arrival. Rumour has it Brad sees this not as a challenge about their parenting but a challenge about race. I’m told he was on the phone some time late last week and he mentioned something to the effect of (my source paraphrased) – “we got pregnant with Shiloh less than a year after bringing Z home and I don’t recall anyone saying that was too short. So is it because it’s too short or is it because Shiloh is biological?”

Also – Maddox is rumoured to have traveled with Angelina last week with a quick stop in Vietnam. Have received multiple reports of sightings on a Cathay Pacific flight, Angie and Madd were in Business Class, very low key, Maddox was sleepy but apparently still full of personality and hugged his mom a lot, they were on their way to Hong Kong presumably connecting to LA back to NOLA.

Will keep you posted.

the real tita @ 03/07/2007 at 1:00 pm

#30: Anon, so what’s making your head explode? The fact that Angie gets more attention now or that anything they do is news? and Rachel, are you upset in the knowledge that even if you adopt a hundred kids, no paps will ever stalk you?

Why is it so impossible to get into your thick heads that they are what they are because they are stars and we love them? You are not and nor will you be so stop with the useless whining. Envy and jealousy aren’t virtues…they are cardinal sins and they will eat you up.

Focus your energy into improving your lot and maybe you won’t be so miserable about someone else’s fortune.

Jane Public @ 03/07/2007 at 1:00 pm

#
159
+++ Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 12:28 pm - flag comment

143
US Magazine Says

I’m sure she’s gonna smoke like a chimney again after seeing all these blissful picture of Brad and his new family.
*****************
Don’t believe the spin, Traniston is still smoking.

trying one more time

168
+++ Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:35 pm - flag comment
157
hanna Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:26 pm - flag comment

Thank you for this news. The Senior Pitts seems to be enjoying their role as the grandparents of Brad and Angie kids.

******
Brad and his kids

Mediterranean @ 03/07/2007 at 1:01 pm

Sorry, friends. While I was preparing the bath for her, she wrote these things. When I didn’t hear any scream, I knew that she was up to something.

Pardon again

trying one more time

168
+++ Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:35 pm - flag comment
157
hanna Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:26 pm - flag comment

Thank you for this news. The Senior Pitts seems to be enjoying their role as the grandparents of Brad and Angie kids.

******

http://img62.imageshack.us/my.php?image=aquarium2b005bo2.jpg

182
Mediterraneanç_i(uij Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:46 pm - flag comment
uirjurjrkrjtutrurt
================

So, medi, that was your 3 year old blogging? I was wondering if it was a foreign language you wrote. :lol:

hi susie,

we just finished with dinner, and even washdishes, everything is done, so i can sit again on my pc, well, susie, i didn/t see Maddox on that pics, i just can see holly wears yellow skirt and black top, and also brad’s butt (hot) with slingers maybe he’s with Shiloh, i like that blogs, they give some new update thrads, and from that you can go to SimplyBrad of Pitt Impression, but I like Just Jared too, feel BAMZSers support our Bragelina, so just wait for the news announcement of Brad or Angie, about the adoptions, its their bussiness, just wait and calm down, enjooy the pics
and also thebragelineespanol.blogs says, Angie has a new ad of Shiseido (vid) unforrtunatelyy i could’t posted the links, anyone? can teach me how to links the post thanks
time : 19.07

jane public says,i think maniston just wants to on the news.who cares if she smokes . people who says is soon shouldnot judge them.they have the resources and determination to have a big family and i support them

Thanks Hanna for the tidbit on the Museum siting, and thanks Angelah for the links.

hanna- it looks like in the picture angelah posted #197, that you can see a blurry shadow in front of Holly. I guess it’s Mad. I’m not sure if AJ would take Mad to a war torn area anyways especially when she is there for work with UNHRC. JMO To post the links, highlight your address bar, go under Edit window and hit copy, then bring it here and go under edit again and hit paste. This might get lost in translation though. Do you have kids?

Angelah- thank you posting the pics, do you see Mad?

Medi- I thought that was your daughter, the quiet times are the worse times! LOL :lol: :lol:

greetings from Holland,

the smile of your children are beutifull
the smile of Brad and Angie children are beutifull
the smile of my child is beutifulll
every smile of children always beutifull,

remember the smile of your children makes your world completely…

Going to buy People magazine. The cover is too cute.
Don’t care for Us Weekly.

piper, with a low @ 03/07/2007 at 1:17 pm

148
B&A are Lame Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:18 pm - flag comment
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sean Preston didn’t have a full year of his mother’s attention before Jaden came along. And his second year isn’t starting on a high note, is it?

197
Mediterranean Says:

LOL!! My 3 yr old son has sent an email similar to that to a collegue of mine:)

faye says i totally agree with you.angelah says thanks for the nice pics,this shows what a normal family they are

Thanks Hanna the Museum sighting :D

i hope whenwhen their child comes, they will be given privacy to bond with him

hi angelah

ya, those pic that i saw on that blogs, thanks anyway for the links, and can you see the people there, so normal with Brad, i just a bit jealous that woman so shy smile to Brad, i wish i could be there (my dream..) like i want to have a body like angie, so skinny (because i have been gained for 13 kilos) …….

another candid moment and look who brad’s heart and attention naturally go to…shiloh. if it had been angelina, grandma pitt would be holding the baby and ange would be holding z. holly would still be with mad.

he’s not even paying attention to the other two. he just has shi and that’s all that counts.

just like in india when they got out of their minivan and walked into the airport. brad holding shi pretended to care about waiting for the others to catch up but the truth is, he doesn’t and pretty much left them all behind.

you remember. admit it.

she can say how much she loves each child (yeah right!) until she’s blue in the face but no father (who always wanted kids of his own) will really and truly feel non-partisan. I don’t care what he’s said in the past.

it will always be his biological kids that he will feel more towards. I guess in that way, they balance each other out.

20/20 says shut the **** up,you are nothing but a pest.you speak like a castrated bull.i think you are as empty in the inside as in the outside.people like you should be flagged from this site.we will not allow you to mess up this thread.you are an idiot and your behavior is questionable

#193 Lainey’s Post Says:

++++++++++

I do not think Maddox went with AJ, remember the carriage ride he took with grandma Jane, Shiloh, Holly (and I think Z was next to Holly). that was while AJ was gone.

rumors, rumors….

Mr. and Mrs. Smith @ 03/07/2007 at 1:36 pm

212
20/20 Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 1:26 pm - flag comment
________________________________________________________________

I can’t even be mad at your post cause your posts are making me laugh too much.

Thank you angelah for the pics.When were they taken?I just connected and I didn’t have the time to read previous posts.

Hey BAMZS+1 fans! Whatever are we going to do with the next letter. I hope Maddox has chosen the name wisely, but we’ll know soon enough.

CMAR are you out there?

These magazines had some of their biggest sellers with the “Yes, I’m Pregnant” and
“It’s a Girl!” issues. They know who sells magazines, and it’s not the X.

#212 20/20 Says:

why so judgemental? you don’t even know these people, you have absolutely no idea what BP feels or doesn’t. do you have any adopted kids in your family? I do, and there is absolutely NO DIFFERENCE in how that child gets treated! loved just as much as anyone else, at least in our family.

you must lead a sad life to be so angry

Don’t respond to the ignorant haters.

natural ..... @ 03/07/2007 at 1:40 pm

212
20/20 Says:
———————
what a naive thing to write about. if you even have children of your own .. it’s natural for parents to “pamper” the youngest child simply because .. they are the youngest .. and have yet to be able to be independent like the older 2 years old or 5 years old child. It’s a normal action of any parents in this world !!!!!!!!!

Don’t go picking on them .. you are just faulting B & A on every darn thing that they do.

20/20-

http://justjared.buzznet.com/tags/brad-pitt/page/7/

look at the archive, the thread “Brad and Angie out of Indie”

Brad carried Mad and Z. Angie carried Shiloh

isitreallythatserious? @ 03/07/2007 at 1:41 pm

212
20/20 Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 1:26 pm - flag comment
————-
You are getting all that from a few in the moment pics to sum up Brad and Angelina relationship with their kids? Do you or do you not realize how ignorant you sound when post about something like that? I guess using your tea leaves and 10/5 vision makes you feel like you are giving an informed opinion but it makes you come off like the donkey you really are.

20/20- clearly you are another barren womb, just like The Chin. Why don’t you see if you can find someone to have kids with, hopefully they won’t look like you :evil:, then come back here and tell us how you love 1 more than the other!

I don’t think Angelina took Mad with her. It is way too dangerous there and she takes her work for UNHCR very seriously, plus we did see him with Grandma. :lol:

do it I say @ 03/07/2007 at 1:43 pm

flag 20/20

i am sorry that i respnded to a hater.this one has being here since morning.i should be in my best behavior and ignore .sorry for using foul language

221
BCBG Says:

http://justjared.buzznet.com/tags/brad-pitt/page/7/

look at the archive, the thread “Brad and Angie out of Indie”

Brad carried Mad and Z. Angie carried Shiloh

______________

can somebody save that pic, for future reference.

I agree with #220, Don’t respond to the haters, there are some positive posts here to respond to. Let’s concentrate on them.

it takes alot more than money to raise a family- just look at the messed up rich kids already buzzing out of every hollywood club. These two barely had time to form a relationship before 3 additional kids join them. Her mother has just died and she has had serious mental health problems- i work in the health sector and there are good reasons why that sort of personal history prevents/delays people from adopting and certainly when they are grieving. babies only bring happiness if your content in yourself and ready for one- otherwise they can bring exhaustion and anxiety and isolation. I don’t like/dislike any of them but i think it is too early to be adopting more children.And for waht its worth, now i’ve got started , maybe jen didn’t have kids because she didn’t think the relatioship was strong enough- i know few people nowadays do things not for themselves but maybe she did- and did the right thing.

The real lou @ 03/07/2007 at 1:54 pm

Wow,some of the trolls lurking this site have really lost their minds.Angelina and Brad have a hold on these people,that’s for sure!I can’t stand Paris Hilton but do I google her name and look for articles about her?NO!Do I go from site to site seeking out her pictures just to go on a thread to trash her?NO!Another thing I find just as scary the trolls are also being obsessed with certain posters on this site.(CLINIQUA seems to be very popular)Obsessing over people you claim to dislike and you call us crazy?LOL!

# 212
———————
what a naive thing to write about. if you even have children of your own .. it’s natural for parents to “alway carry” the baby of the house simply because .. they are the youngest .. and have yet to be able to be independent like the older 2 years old or 5 years old child, who can wait, talk and have ability at least to communicate. It’s a normal action and instinct of any parents in this world !!!!!!!!!

Don’t go picking on them .. you are just faulting B & A on every darn thing that they do.

I just want you to know there is “anon”, BAMZS fan and “Anon”, X’s fan.

anon says that is your opinion and i DONOT AGREE.i think they can handle as maNY CHILDREN as they want because they have the love and care to spread aroun.people who have the resources and donot help should be ashamed of them selves

230
anon Says:

blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

_ did do the right thing - for herself. Now Brad and Angelina are doing the right thing for themselves.

All the posts show that there is no hard and fast rule of how many, how soon, etc people should grow a family. Everyone has a different experience and perspective so ultimately it’s up to the family concerned to make the right choices for them.

Sorry, but I found this from Poster Anon (#230) so hilarious:

maybe jen didn’t have kids because she didn’t think the relatioship was strong enough- i know few people nowadays do things not for themselves but maybe she did- and did the right thing.

Sheesh, together with a man for SEVEN AND 1/2 YEARS and she didn’t think the relationship was strong enough? Then, she’s right, if it wasn’t strong after all that time then it would never be, and they were right to be divorced. And you, as a Jenfan, should be happy then that Brad took that unwanted, weak relationship that he had with Jen and moved on, and so should Jennifer. And as for Brad and Angelina being together and having so many children so soon, that ain’t your problem now, is it? Just be happy for Jennifer and leave Brad and Angelina alone.

i am kinda confuse i thought anon was bamzs fan

We’ve been over this before, but X certainly has every right to not have kids. In fact, if she isn’t sure, she SHOULDN’T have them. The problem is that she married a guy who clearly ALWAYS wanted a family, and I believe she kept him dangling for a long time on the baby front.

The real lou @ 03/07/2007 at 2:09 pm

#230 anon,Thank you for your bias opinion,I don’t agree.I have a Mother that is a therapist and a uncle who is a psychologist and they are both FINE with Angelina adopting again.The funny thing is my Mother told me back in Dec when she saw Angelina on GMA that the next child they adopted would be a boy age 3 or 4.

Hi Ida,

I have been busy with work, we are being audited, so there is a lot to be done.

I have been lurking a lot , looking at all the beautiful pics of the family. I try to igone the haters, it is unmistakale that Brad and Angie love all thier children, but the haters choose to believe otherwise. The funny thing is they are basing their argument on the number of times, each parent has held a child, this is just laughable.

anon is BAMZS fan, there is one that writes her name as Anon as in capital A, she’s X’s fan. She comes in to BAMZS thread everyone once in a while to write nonsense. Don’t confuse anon with Anon.

isitreallythatserious? @ 03/07/2007 at 2:11 pm

230
anon Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 1:51 pm - flag comment
—————–
My grandparents met and married after just three months of knowing each other and nine kids and 52 years later…they are still together. Time doesn’t matter when it comes to have a strong or weak relationship…two ppl can just click and be able to have a great partnership that is life long.

Now with the mental health of Angelina Jolie, unless you have treated her personally, I don’t think you are able to give her a sound diagnosis of her mental state. If Angelina has these “serious mental health” issue you are speaking about then why was she able to adopted Maddox let alone adopted Z in the first place? The person who did her home study would have been able to pick up on these suppose mental issue she have and would not have allowed her to adopted. And let’s not forget that Brad has been living with her for the last two years and I’m sure he would have seen these mental issue by now and would have either A. ran the opposite way with the kids or B. seeking the necessary help for her and their family. I’m going with B for I don’t see Brad allowing someone who could harm the children (mentally and emotionally) to see after them for most of the day.

Lastly….everyone keep saying that the Jolie - Pitts started this process a little bit after Shiloh was born which was months before her mother died and the child they are adopting will not be in their home tomorrow or anytime soon, so I don’t understand why you are bring her mother’s death up. I’m sure AJ is grieving but her mother would want her to move on and live her life.

hi susie,

thanks for teach me for the links, i ‘ll try later hopefully. yes i have one child (son)
next week ( 12 March) he’ll be 7 years, he’s good mix product (asian and ducht)
i am a single mom since my son 2 months, so i am working for old people, who you called it in US, my duties like helping them for bathing, feeding etc,

OT Looks like In touch finally started to pick on another couple http://intouchweekly.hollywood.com/content/cover/img_cover.gif

piper, with a low @ 03/07/2007 at 2:19 pm

Haters are reaching… clearly, intelligence is not within their grasp.

piper, with a low @ 03/07/2007 at 2:22 pm

247
bluemoon Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 2:19 pm - flag comment
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

In Touch are fcuking losers!!

Shiloh isn’t the only one getting a brother. Hello… Maddox and Zahara.

247
bluemoon Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 2:19 pm - flag comment

Lmao at the title who will get suri.

nope, we are not admitt that Brad only cares for Shiloh
yep, we are admitt that Brad CARES for Maddox, Zahara and Shiloh

take that…

Mediterranean @ 03/07/2007 at 2:24 pm

Why do we believe in what Lainey wrote about the Jolie-Pitts after seeing Maddox with his grandmother with Shiloh in her arms and Holly on the carriage while Angie was away in Africa?

to NTT and BESANE,

My daughter was only responding the irrational haters in the way they will understand.

I just read #232, I think she’s trying to confuse the fans, this ‘anon’ is not BAMZS fan when the real anon comes you will know from the write-up. I think Anon is now writing her name as anon. You can see Anon’s posts on the first page.

dragonfly @ 03/07/2007 at 2:26 pm

128
diamondhead Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 12:01 pm - flag comment

It’s a fact they already have 5 nannies - then there’s the house cleaners to clean up after the kids, the chefs to feed the kids…..

**********************************************

5 nannies? They do not have 5 nannies.

And “chefs”? Hahaa!!!

Soooo NOT True. Yes, they have 1 nanny, and probably a cook/housekeeper, but they both cook for the kids regularly, and appear to be very hands-on parents.

Sheesh. Haul yourself back to Female First or Dlisted where the rest of the knuckle-dragging troglodytes live and thrive off of making stuff up and telling each other lies until they believe their own delusions.

the haters are so desperate that they donot make logical arguments

230
anon Says:
________________
Not every hollywood children are messed up. There are many hollywood children who are responsible and successful people.

G Paltrow comes from parents and grand parents who are in the entertainment business. She doesnt seem mess up to me. While growing up, her mother who is also an actress quit acting full time. Her mother took the children every summer to England and did stage plays. Tom Hanks’ son is also doing well. So dont generalize.

The most important thing is the parents. If the parents are committed, loving, understand to PUT THE CHILDREN 1ST, and themselves (parents) second, those children will grow well.

We all know, Angie lighten up her work schedule and move to NO as a stay at home mom. We’ve all seen that when one parent works, the other stays home with the kids.

We know also that they travel to the 3rd world countries a lot. Anybody who’ve seen what the conditions of any emerging countries will come to APPRECIATE what they have. This is what Bill Gates said he would expose his children to other countries so that they would stay grounded.

One of the most important life skill is to be able to adapt and to improvise. In life, when you work and in the management level, you’re paid, and paid well to solve problems. Part of Brad and Angie’s philosophy of raising their children is like the training of a future CEO. I was very impressed when I read the peopel mag.

From people mag (end of year issue) p.74

“……In one place we stay, Mad has an Xbox. But we dont have that anywhere else. So, it’s exciting when he gets to play it, because he knows he cant have it all the time. Same with Z. We’ve tried to make them very adaptable, so when we go to a country like India or certain parts of Nambia, they’re happy to play with sticks and rocks outside-they’re happy to blend”.

No one can predict the future whether these children will be an actor/actress, doctor, lawyer, engineer etc. But I guarantee you that these children will grow up to be self-assured, independent, and responsible people.

The real lou @ 03/07/2007 at 2:28 pm

#239 hey hey,LMAO!That was hilarious!Now off to the store before picking up the 2 little one’s from school.BBL.

I believe Us weekly and Lainey have the same source.

250
Mediterranean Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 2:24 pm - flag comment
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And she also said I love BAMZS, LOL

Yay, Maddox is getting a sidekick. Shiloh, Zahara, another boy… good for them, but MADDOX STILL RUNS THE SHOW in their household. He started the whole thing and people are still mad. LOL

please says thanks for the correction i was almost loosing it

there is a video of JA on TMZ and in it she is seen coming out of a place with sam rockwell (he’s the one who she hugs and kisses at the end) brad’s co-star in AOJJ.

dragonfly says:

Sheesh. Haul yourself back to Female First or Dlisted where the rest of the knuckle-dragging troglodytes live and thrive off of making stuff up and telling each other lies until they believe their own delusions.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I love love love the knuckle-dragging troglodytes description, so funny!!!! It’s so true that at FF they get any old tab story about Angelina (usually NE) and run with it, believing that Brad and Angelina fight all the time, she is controlling, etc and they already have predictions on when they will split. But they never ever paid attention to either the Newsweek interview of Brad or the Vogue interview of Angelina, or even the TV interviews she did during the promotion of TGS. They are really steeped in their own delusional brine that they don’t know which side is up and which is down, all they know is that they cannot stand to see Brad and Angelina together.

isitreallythatserious? @ 03/07/2007 at 2:34 pm

247
bluemoon Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 2:19 pm - flag comment
———————
LMAO! About time the start in on TomKat. My vote is the Travoltas or L. Ron Hubbard will get Suri but who knows.

260
20/20 Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 2:33 pm - flag comment

errrr… And?

253
ida Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 2:26 pm - flag comment
the haters are so desperate that they donot make logical arguments

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
that’s why it is exhausting arguing with them.

can post the link to the new pics with grandma Pitt?

i hope when they return to LA, they can still have the freedom to move around freely,i hope the paparazzi give them a break

Who will get Suri? Brad and Angie!!

credit: Gerber @ 03/07/2007 at 2:37 pm

165Gerber Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 12:32 pm

The biggest problem with Jen is too much talking with NO action . Talk is cheap .. but getting off your butt and actually making things happen in life is the challenge ! Making Life work for you and loved one is never easy. It takes committment, effort , compromise .

I believed most of BAMZS posters, majority who are married with kids do knows what it takes to make a marriage work and and the effort to raise a family as a unit.

Living a life as a single or life of committed relationship but separate individual lifestyle is totally different from being a cohesive family unit and doing things together , compromising , understanding and making things work as a committed family unit. The later takes effort on both parties.. great effort !

The way that Brad and Angelina are doing everything together shows their committment to each other and to the family.

By adding another child to the family shows their intense commitment to raise a family together for a very long haul. They are doing what they both enjoy intensely, a fulfilled relationship with their love for parenting and children. What else can you say about them except Beautiful Hearts Beautiful Family !

260
20/20 Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 2:33 pm - flag comment
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You’re on the wrong thread…

The entertainment industry puts a lot of burden on the celebrities. They want them to get married and then they talk about their marriage being in trouble, like they are doing for Tom and Katie. All they want is to sell bad stories.

Mr. and Mrs. Smith @ 03/07/2007 at 2:41 pm

Who here thinks that Us Weekly put that “Angelina promised a large donation to the orphanage the day she get her child” comment from an official on purpose to taint the article in a negative way towards Angie? To be honest, I don’t think any official said anything like that at all to that magazine. Remember, this is the same magazine that twists articles around to say Angie or Brad told them things when they did not. I was also pleased when I read that neither Angie’s or Brad’s reps got back to them with replies to that comment. I like that they don’t waste their time answering Us magazine when they can go to People magazine. It’s also good that all this negativity is happening now and in about 3-4 months time when the little boy comes, it will all have blown over.

266
ida Says:
“““““““`
We all can hope, but I am sure it is not likely to happen. Anything with them sells. Look at all the tabloids lately, they are on the covers every week

lol says that is funny

#260, 20/20 says:

Oh, who the f*ck cares? Go post it on the JA thread! Oh, I forgot, there isn’t a new one!!! Ha ha ha! Oh well, go whine to Jared to post a new Jennifer Aniston thread, tell him to salvage any news on her and post it, so you can have your own sandbox to play in.

dragonfly @ 03/07/2007 at 2:45 pm

261
briseis Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 2:33 pm - flag comment
love love love the knuckle-dragging troglodytes description, so funny!!!! It’s so true that at FF they get any old tab story about Angelina (usually NE) and run with it, believing that Brad and Angelina fight all the time, she is controlling, etc and they already have predictions on when they will split.
****************************

LMAO!! Glad that tickled your funny bone, cuz damn. Just DAMN. How much more unevolved and primitive can you get than these posters? They make Jabba the Hut look like a sophisticated conversationalist.

hanna- we have some things in common. I am a single mom too. My boys are 3 and 4. You have a birthday coming up, how fun! :) I also did some home health care when I was studying to be a nurse. It’s great to get to know you. :) :)

A note on this so called “serious mental problems”. Many, dare I say most, people go through difficult mental times in their teens and early 20’s. It is not rare to feel lost, confused, depressed etc… it is common to feel these emotions. Because Angelina is in the spot light, we all know what she went through. Now here’s the part that the haters cannot seem to get around, she has grown, she has changed, she has found a purpose for her life, she has said this herself. To call her mental now is just straight up ignorant. Take a good look at her life, she is a happy beautiful woman with three very loved children, she is successfull, she is an inspiration- llok at all the awarness she brought to refugees, she is loved by a man who loves her, now if that is the sign of a seriously mentally sick person then where do I sign up?????

dragonfly @ 03/07/2007 at 2:48 pm

270
Mr. and Mrs. Smith Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 2:41 pm - flag comment
Who here thinks that Us Weekly put that “Angelina promised a large donation to the orphanage the day she get her child” comment from an official on purpose to taint the article in a negative way towards Angie?
**********************************************

I think they put in there so that later they can say she never made the donation, and make a story out of that. A donation that was possibly never promised in the first place.

#265 annon says:
++++++++++++

if you did not see the pics with Maddoc and grandma Pitt in teh carriage then you are certainly no BAMZS fan….’cause they were everywhere after last weekend!

I don’t care what US have to say this week, because People will have the “official” details. So, US weekly could (Depending what they worte) end looking like an ass, that’s why I love that People have the same cover story.

The entertainment industry puts a lot of burden on the celebrities. They want them to get married and then they talk about their marriage being in trouble, like they are doing for Tom and Katie. All they want is to sell bad stories.
++++++++++++++++++++
That’s how they work, first they write a billion articles on how 2 people are dating, will date, like each other, will get married etc.. the minute they start dating or get married the tabloids start with the problems, cheating, divorce is soon campaing.

no need to give haters URL, they just want to waste our time.

tell them to go do their own searching.

those pics were in the previous thread.

dragonfly says us weekly are so out of touch.they try to turn something positive into negative.it cannot work

276
dragonfly Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 2:48 pm - flag comment
270
Mr. and Mrs. Smith Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 2:41 pm - flag comment
Who here thinks that Us Weekly put that “Angelina promised a large donation to the orphanage the day she get her child” comment from an official on purpose to taint the article in a negative way towards Angie?
**********************************************

I think they put in there so that later they can say she never made the donation, and make a story out of that. A donation that was possibly never promised in the first place.
====================================================
ITA. Watch, radaronline.com will run with this story again, and make a big stink about it. See, they love to do this, since they cannot fault Angelina’s humanitarian efforts, then they make stories about their donations, knowing how tabs and irresponsible blogs pick up on made-up stories (like the Namibia donation). Then ignorant posters will say that they never came through with their donations and bash them for it. Ay-ay-ay.

African Girl @ 03/07/2007 at 2:55 pm

Gitane
Aaaah, thank goodness, for a moment there, I thought the hex backfired and I had blindly myself to everything JP. Fortunately, it was just my silly computer. Anyway, you are so right….but we can’t take too much pleasure in their suffering, you know personal gain and all. Oy, sometimes this powers aren’t that much fun.

97
cookie Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 11:44 am - flag comment
to all haters and basically a MANISTON LOVERS,just go away and wait for another sensational news about chinniston,but by the way it seems nobody paying attention to her now!i could see another MEG RYAN PHENOMENON!.GETTING OLD,UGLIER,MORE BORING THAN EVER AND NO MOVIES!!!!pls producers give chinniston some jobs!!!!all her fans are getting wild now!
_______

They blame for Brad for dumping her because they know without Brad’s connection, she will just be another actress on lifetime.
When she was with Brad, she had movies offer but not anymore.

I hope she doesn’t get Meg Ryan’s lip. I like Meg but don’t know why she would go and change her face. she was pretty in sleepless in seattle

the real tita @ 03/07/2007 at 2:57 pm

#212: 20/20, please check your vision or your logic. It’s seriously impaired.

Now what would you have Brad do when he goes out with the kids? Sling one over his shoulder, carry one in each arm? so when they add another kid, should he put that one on top of his head or should that one hold on to his neck or leg while he’s walking?

ARE YOU THAT STUPID? OR ARE YOU TELLING US THAT IS HOW YOUR FATHER CARRIED YOU AND YOUR SIBLINGS WHENEVER YOU WENT OUT? WHAT DID YOUR MOTHER DO? WHO DID SHE CARRY? CERTAINLY NOT YOU, THE WAY THAT YOU TURNED OUT TO BE!! IDIOT!!

http://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AIDObama, Pitt invited to speak at MSU conference
Steve Koehler
News-Leader
Two internationally recognizable names could be added to the speakers’ list of the third-annual Missouri State University Public Affairs Conference next month.
Democratic president candidate Barack Obama and former Springfieldian Brad Pitt have been invited to speak at the event, which will be held April 17-20.
“They are not saying no. Brad Pitt is still in play,” said Ken Rutherford, organizer of the conference entitled “One World, Many Voices

US Magazine put that in there to show how she’s greasing the palms of these officials to get preferential treatment and hopscotch over the ordinary peons (your bretheren) who may be waiting to adopt as well.

justsoyouknow @ 03/07/2007 at 2:58 pm

#
262
20/20 Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 2:33 pm - flag comment

there is a video of JA on TMZ and in it she is seen coming out of a place with sam rockwell (he’s the one who she hugs and kisses at the end) brad’s co-star in AOJJ.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

hes hot much hotter than brad . they are probably going to make a movie together. jens a producer now and shes working with meryl streep. i bet he would rather work with her than brad anyday

Jen Reacts to the Adoption

March 7, 2007

Sources tell Us that the former Mrs. Brad Pitt isn’t batting an eye over the adoption announcement. “She doesn’t care what Brad and Angelina do anymore. She has moved on,” a source close the actress tells Us.

I don’t know why us weekly needed to go there. It’s like DUH of course she moved on a long time ago with Vince Vaughn. It’s just her fans and the tabloids stuck in the past. It’s like poor Vince doesn’t even exist.

http://www.nola.com/entertainment/t-p/index.ssf?/base/entertainment
Camera ready
Famed filmmaker praises New Orleans as a movie town
Wednesday, March 07, 2007
By Doug MacCash
Art critic
Post-Katrina New Orleans is ready for its close-up.

“People here have real faces, like human beings,” director David Fincher said of the New Orleans extras who’ve fleshed out the scenes of “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,” the big-budget motion picture starring Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett that’s nearing completion after four months of shooting in and around the Crescent City.

Not everyone on the other side of the camera came in for disdain. “Benjamin Button” star Brad Pitt, who also starred in “Se7en” and “Fight Club,” is a Fincher favorite.
“There’s something amazing about him,” Fincher said. “He can say horrible (things) and if he smiles at you, you say, ‘Oh, OK.’

“I trust him. When he says I’ve got to do this this way, you go, ‘OK.’ ”

-

280
sophie Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 2:48 pm - flag comment
#265 annon says:
++++++++++++

if you did not see the pics with Maddoc and grandma Pitt in teh carriage then you are certainly no BAMZS fan….’cause they were everywhere after last weekend!

**********

hmmm so i need to spend every minute of my life on the net in case there are new pics of bamzs around :)
i don’t understand why so-called bamzs fans are angry at everything… you didn’t follow the news one week, you missed some pics, bam! you are blamed for not being a fan… i bet angelina and brad are sweet individuals. but not their fans for sure…

I called up several adoption agencies , licensed and recognized by Vietnam

1-314-890-0086. I told her that I want to adopt a boy from Vietnam, that I’m single living with a boyfriend. She said their agency will not take my application. She said this is “just the agency policy”, nothing to do with the VietNam law. Vietnam doesnt care about cohabitating .

1-214-342-8388. They said they will take my application even I’m living with my boyfriend.

So it’s NOT the VietNam having the issue. It’s just different agency has different policy.

Angie complies with the law.

justsoyouknow @ 03/07/2007 at 3:01 pm

#
289
20/20 Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 2:58 pm - flag comment

US Magazine put that in there to show how she’s greasing the palms of these officials to get preferential treatment and hopscotch over the ordinary peons (your bretheren) who may be waiting to adopt as well.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

yea when jen adopts she will wait and take her time just like the other people

290 says why do always use brad for comparism.that means you lunatics cannot move on.brad is 43 years old hotter than ever with the love of his life and beloved children.you must be fuc king halucinating

piper, with a low @ 03/07/2007 at 3:04 pm

Again, people’s skewed, prejudiced perceptions takes precedence over photographic/videotaped proof.

For those ‘concerned’ that Angelina’s adoption of another child may be symptomatic of her ongoing grief over mother, where the h#ll were these ‘concerned’ people when Howard K. Stern propped up a grieving, and clearly, chemically impaired Anna Nicole on ET and the Insider, not to mention the photo spreads for the tabs? Where was the call to arms when she was jerking around the possible father of her child, again, with the assistance of HKS?

Anna Nicole was the personification of grief hinging on perversion and yet, here you are, on a BAMZS thread, questioning a woman who was there during her mother’s illness and subsequent death. Isn’t it possible that along the way, Marcheline prepared her daughter for the inevitable as opposed to Anna Nicole, who was so fixated on her own drama/warped sense of cultural relevance, she missed that her son was in trouble, or worse, fostered an environment where opportunistic @$$holes could profit from both her and her son’s chemical impairment/deathes?

Angelina is 7 years younger, has more children, and definitely have a firmer grip on reality, her life, the lives of her children, and the well-being of her man than Anna Nicole ever had and yet, pathetic, grasping @$$holes continually try to punch holes into something that Angelina, clearly, invested time, energy, and love into?

Bizarro Logic– just when I thought you were on vacation, you’re back with the vengeance of a mentally stunted kindergartener!

Yeah, 2 years, 3 kids, one VV later, the tabs and jenfans haven’t moved on. And Jen herself is still coping. :lol:

295
justsoyouknow Says:

just so you know, you are a idiot.

justsoyouknow @ 03/07/2007 at 3:08 pm

of course jen has moved on she’s the biggest and most beautiful star in hollywood. she doesn’t need brad or vince or anyone. everyone loves her

just go to tmz and read the comments about big chin,hilarious.every bamzs fans should go see those comments ha ha ha hahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Darfur gunmen kill 2 peacekeepers

By MOHAMMED OSMAN,

Associated Press Writer

1 hour, 20 minutes ago

KHARTOUM, Sudan - Gunmen have killed two African Union peacekeepers and critically wounded a third in Sudan’s western Darfur region, the AU said Wednesday.

The peacekeeping mission said it was “deeply concerned” the gunmen were believed to belong to the Sudan Liberation Army, the rebel faction that signed the Darfur Peace Agreement in May 2006.

That signatories of the accord would attack peacekeepers is a severe blow to international attempts to promote the peace process and persuade other warring factions to join it.

The gunmen abducted and killed the two peacekeepers while they were “on administrative duty” Monday in the Darfur town of Graida, the AU said. “A third soldier was critically injured,” the statement said, without giving details of how the attack was carried out.

“This deplorable and condemnable act was perpetrated by gunmen believed to be elements belonging to Sudan Liberation Movement or Army (Minni Minnawi faction), which is in full control of Graida,” the statement said, referring to the leader of the SLA who signed the peace agreement.

In Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, where the African Union has its headquarters, an official said the slain peacekeepers were Nigerian.

“They were just shopping. They were unarmed and they were attacked by unidentified men,” said Mahmoud Kane, the head of the African Union’s Darfur Integrated Task Force.

The deaths brought to 11 the number of AU military personnel who have been killed on duty since the force was deployed to Darfur in 2004. Another peacekeeper is listed as missing.

With the 7,000-member AU force overwhelmed in a region the size of Texas, the U.N. Security Council last year recommended replacing it with more than 20,000 U.N. peacekeepers. The Sudanese government has rejected this, insisting the AU needs only technical assistance and equipment from the United Nations.

Also Monday, about 30 gunmen of groups that signed the May accord surrounded an office for the implementation of the peace agreement in El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur, and “threatened the officer-in-charge,” the AU said.

The African Union is “deeply concerned that these, and other recent incidents of this nature, occurred in El Fasher and Graida, both of them strongholds of the signatories.”

The AU said the slain peacekeepers’ vehicle was stolen. It called on the Minnawi faction to investigate the attack and ensure the vehicle is returned.

More than 200,000 people have died and more than 2.5 million people have been displaced in four years of fighting in Darfur. The conflict began when members of the region’s ethnic African tribes took up arms against what they saw as decades of neglect and discrimination by the Arab-dominated government in Khartoum.

The government is accused of unleashing a pro-government Arab militia that has committed many of the atrocities in the conflict.

Several rebel factions refused to sign the May accord, leading to an escalation in fighting.

301
justsoyouknow Says:

ok great, then everyone should be happy, now it’s time for you to move on.. Off you go.

#293 anon Says

+++++++++++

every minute on the net? you must not eat then either, ’cause those pics were plastered all over tabloids prominently displayed at the checkout lines.

and..I believe it was YOU who satrted unpleasantries today, my sweet!

yea when jen adopts she will wait and take her time just like the other people

ROTFLMAOPIMP!!!

You guys are so hilarious today! WHEN JEN ADOPTS? HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR! She will wait and take her time just like the other people at the DOG KENNEL waiting for a new puppy, is what you mean. Jen adopt a real live baby? With the way she is — a needy, manipulative beeyotch? That will be the day! HAR HAR HAR!! Laughter is really the best medicine, thank you haters for making me feel so good today!

If Jen really wanted to adopt, with all her money, she should have gotten a baby by now unless she is waiting for the blonde, blue-eyed baby — then she will have to wait awhile, there’s a very high premium for those.

piper, with a low @ 03/07/2007 at 3:13 pm

291
LOL Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 2:59 pm - flag comment
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I just don’t get it; why is there still an ongoing dialogue between US Mag (aka, their sources) and ___, regarding her ex-husband of nearly two years.

Most human beings are capable of giving off the ‘Don’t go there’ vibe and yet, ___ can’t or won’t. Clearly, ___’s future cooperation with US isn’t worth a thing, so ___, along with the millions of the weary are stuck with this stupid line of questioning.

ntt—-Ain’t that the truth? If you go on X’s imdb site, there aren’t many future projects in the pipeline. There’s no guy–unless there’s that poor unnamed cameraman who probably changed his phone number. And identity. And moved. And she’s had the boobs and nose done, and no one cares except those hardcore fans–all four of them. And Brad and Angie keep on moving forward.

Ladies, dlisted is down, Anon, now calling herself anon is from there, so she’s temporarily stuck on JJ today, you might have to ignore her.

Mediterranean @ 03/07/2007 at 3:16 pm

Susie,

How are you?

As you said, when we don’t hear them screaming, they do something to make you scream! Right?

African Girl @ 03/07/2007 at 3:19 pm

248
piper, with a low Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 2:19 pm - flag comment
Haters are reaching… clearly, intelligence is not within their grasp.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lmao…BEST LINE EVERRRRRR!!!!

#308 please Says:

hey, thanks for the heads up…I knew I had seen anon/Anon before!

Jen has moved on, but the same can’t be said about her fans.

Mr. and Mrs. Smith @ 03/07/2007 at 3:21 pm

289
20/20 Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 2:58 pm - flag comment
________________________________________________________________

All your comments do is make me laugh. You are so delusional that it’s too funny.

302 says you are desulusional.that ugly face fake every thing.what a loser

You got punked @ 03/07/2007 at 3:21 pm

Us weekly knows if they put “how jen’s coping” in there her fans will run to buy the mag. ..Then they open it up and see she moved on and doesn’t even care. HAHAHA

Sam Rockwell hotter than Brad?

Forgive me, but has he ever been named hottest man alive? Does anyone outside HW even know who he is? I mean, he’s a good actor and all but HOTTER THAN BRAD? har har har! You FANISTONS ARE REALLY REACHING! Next thing you know you will say that the cameraman she has supposedly hooked up with is HOTTER THAN BRAD!!!

Even Julia Roberts doesn’t say that her cameraman husband Danny Moder is hotter than Benjamin Bratt, Dylan McDermott or any of the gazillion guys she hooked up with before she married Danny. She may think so privately, but she has never said so publicly.

Medi- I’m good, tired though. Yes, the silence is the worst with kids, nothing good is ever going on! lol. I’m going to try to get a little nap in with my younger one, hope your day is going well. :)

BBL

isitreallythatserious? @ 03/07/2007 at 3:24 pm

302
justsoyouknow Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 3:08 pm - flag comment
of course jen has moved on she’s the biggest and most beautiful star in hollywood. she doesn’t need brad or vince or anyone. everyone loves her
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
LMAO! Ok then I guess we don’t need to bring her down by discussing her in this thread.

Great David Fincher article.

Famed filmmaker praises New Orleans as a movie town
Wednesday, March 07, 2007
By Doug MacCash
Art critic
Post-Katrina New Orleans is ready for its close-up.

“People here have real faces, like human beings,” director David Fincher said of the New Orleans extras who’ve fleshed out the scenes of “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,” the big-budget motion picture starring Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett that’s nearing completion after four months of shooting in and around the Crescent City.

Unlike the pool of camera-conscious Hollywood extras he’s used to, New Orleanians lack the “weird nose job, and that lip thing,” Fincher said. “They look like they have real lives.”

Fincher, the renowned director of contemporary noir classics such as “Se7en,” “Fight Club” and the newly released “Zodiac,” addressed 250 communications and film students Sunday afternoon at the University of New Orleans Performing Arts Center. The intimate two-chair format was similar to the Bravo TV series “Inside the Actor’s Studio,” with university provost and film critic Rick Barton posing questions.

Fincher, 44, was raised in Marin County, Calif. — George Lucas was a childhood neighbor — during a filmmaking boom in that part of the state. Once, he said, his grade-school classmates came to school with their heads shaved, having been extras in a science fiction movie.

Inspired by the 1969 movie “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid,” he edged his way into movie-making, first as a special effects technician at Lucas’ Industrial Light and Magic (on “Return of the Jedi”), then as a television commercial director (Nike, Coca-Cola, Levi’s) and music video director (George Michael, Paula Abdul, the Rolling Stones). In 1992 he directed his first feature, “Alien 3,” a production marked by studio meddling and critical drubbing.

Fincher, wearing a chocolate-colored suede jacket, suppressed a cough throughout Sunday’s interview, but nonetheless charmed the crowd with wry, expletive-laced recollections of behind-the-scenes filmmaking. He warned his eager audience that the process may not be as rewarding as they imagine.

“It’s hard to go through all the nonsense of getting a movie made,” he said, citing the early mornings and bad coffee. “The only satisfaction you can get is by doing the work the best you can. . . . There is no actual ego justification for the self-mutilation we put ourselves through.”

He laid part of the hardship at the feet of actors.

“I don’t believe in coddling actors,” he said, referring to his demanding shooting schedule. “We pay them enough. . . . I don’t want (to hear about) their hangovers, being tired or being cranky.”

Fincher recalled that perennial bad-boy Robert Downey Jr. complained of the long hours and fast pace on “Zodiac.” The director joked that one sure technique for getting actors to leave their trailers was to lure them with a fishing line baited with a mirror or cell phone.

“Actors want to be liked,” Fincher said. “I don’t believe in that; it’s obsequious.”

As the director groused conspiratorially, audience members, many dressed with Spielbergian insouciance in baseball caps and worn tennis shoes, guffawed with approval.

Not everyone on the other side of the camera came in for disdain. “Benjamin Button” star Brad Pitt, who also starred in “Se7en” and “Fight Club,” is a Fincher favorite.

“There’s something amazing about him,” Fincher said. “He can say horrible (things) and if he smiles at you, you say, ‘Oh, OK.’

“I trust him. When he says I’ve got to do this this way, you go, ‘OK.’ ”

No matter how profitable, studio executives, Fincher lamented, are rarely pleased with the outcome of a film. The critically acclaimed “Zodiac” was based on the frustrating real-life pursuit of a 1960s and ’70s serial killer who was never caught. Fincher said that although he’d warned executives repeatedly that “Zodiac” would have a much different tone than his 1995 edge-of-your-seat cop thriller “Se7en,” executives were disappointed that “Zodiac” didn’t mirror the fictional action film.

“When they saw it, they said, ‘It’s not “Se7en.” These people just sit in a room and drink coffee from Styrofoam cups.’ ”

He seems to anticipate a similar misunderstanding when “Benjamin Button” is finished. Loosely based on an F. Scott Fitzgerald short story, it is the tale of a man magically born at age 80 and who gets younger as time goes by. Or, as Fincher described it, it’s about a newborn who looks like “a cross between Einstein and a Shar-Pei,” but, “because of his good fortune, gets to be Brad Pitt.”

Along his reverse-chronological path, Button/Pitt falls in love with a woman who ages normally (Cate Blanchett), which led studio executives to embrace the project as a simple love story. Not surprisingly, perhaps, Fincher feels the story is a bit darker and more complex.

“I think it’s a story about death,” he said, “to love somebody enough to be there when they breathe their last breath.”

Fincher said his father died two years ago at about the same time some of his friends were having their first child.

“It’s easy to have babies; it’s hard to be there when somebody dies,” he said.

Fincher said he considered shooting the Victorian-era period piece in Baltimore, where the short story was set, but decided on the Crescent City instead.

“We looked at Baltimore,” he said. “It lacked a certain warmth. It lacked the sense of history and patina of New Orleans.”

Fincher praised New Orleans as a location, noting that both rural and urban sets were easily available. To realize the city’s “enormous potential,” as a movie-making magnet, Fincher said, “you need four or five large, workable sound stages, an influx of cash to make a real workable physical plant.”

Asked to discuss the complications of filmmaking in the post-Katrina environment, Fincher minimized the hardship.

“The challenges of shooting after Katrina,” he said, “were the same as for anybody moving back: getting labor, getting plywood.”

justsoyouknow

needs to

putdownthecrackpipe

that ***** rr was bitten by a doso sorry, i mean the dog.she gets on my nerves, just canot stand her

this thread is not about big chin,she is what she is a d list fake *****.donot discuss her on this thread

hi everyone

IMO she commited suicid career with the VF interview and the circus around , and she’s so dumb that she was proud of it ; sad ;

the real tita @ 03/07/2007 at 3:32 pm

#247: bluemoon, have you ever seen a picture of Tom’s cousin, William Mapother? If you can find a picture of him, compare it to Suri’s (esp. the latest video on the celeb shows). I think the guy’s on that series Lost. Believe it or not, the resemblance is so uncanny (the eyes are a dead giveaway) that if he said he was the father, he could get away with it better than Birkhead could with Dannielynn.

Not everyone on the other side of the camera came in for disdain. “Benjamin Button” star Brad Pitt, who also starred in “Se7en” and “Fight Club,” is a Fincher favorite.

“There’s something amazing about him,” Fincher said. “He can say horrible (things) and if he smiles at you, you say, ‘Oh, OK.’

love that , Bradley , He’s a charmer… :)

Thanks Prez and bdj for the article, very interesting read, cheers.

[Fug Face Maniston] @ 03/07/2007 at 3:34 pm

Hmmmmm…..

I just read that ANGELINA might NOT get the kid she wants to adopt cuz she isnt married to BRAD
haha!

I usually dont mention x but what is all this about her adopting? She told Larry King adoption wasnt for her. Course you cant believe everything she says.

Love the JoliePitts!

Mr. and Mrs. Smith @ 03/07/2007 at 3:35 pm

Okay, to bring this thread back to the discussion of Brad and Angelina and not __, here’s a good article that mentions them. Enjoy. :-)

Tourists go extra mile to do good
More travelers are taking volunteer vacations. A new website aims to help them plan.
By Kimi Yoshino, Times Staff Writer
March 7, 2007

Blame Angelina and Brad and their do-gooding, orphanage-visiting ways. Or maybe it’s all the hurricanes, tsunamis and tornadoes.

Whatever the reason, more tourists — such as college students on spring break, jet-setting luxury travelers and retiring baby boomers — are using their vacations to volunteer.

In the latest example of the growth of “voluntourism,” United Way, one of the nation’s oldest and largest community service organizations, and CheapTickets.com will unveil a website today to link travelers with volunteer work.

“You always had some college kids who go with their church ministry and they build roofs somewhere, but now it’s really something where the industry has taken notice,” said Cathy Keefe, spokeswoman for the Travel Industry Assn. of America. “It’s come a long way from the idea that it’s all crunchy-granola people.”

Recent surveys by online travel company Orbitz, competitor Travelocity and the travel industry group all show increasing interest in volunteer vacations. An even stronger indicator of the interest, Keefe said, is that more travel agencies and tour companies are offering specific volunteer opportunities. In some cases, people can add a day to their trips to focus on a specific cause.

The website doesn’t require visitors to book a vacation with CheapTickets or donate to United Way — but both options are a click away. Still, the site is mostly a way to link tourists with United Way’s 1,300 local chapters by logging on to CheapTickets .com, said Randy Punley, United Way’s director of corporate partnerships.

After travelers decide on their destinations, they can go to the site (volunteer.cheaptickets.com) to pick the specific location for their volunteer work and then select their particular social issue, such as homelessness, domestic violence and drug abuse.

To attract the travelers who might be interested in mixing a good time with good deeds, Punley said, “we’re on MTV, MySpace, Facebook, YouTube.”

Last year, about 100 college students volunteered in Biloxi, Miss., and Foley, Ala., as part of United Way’s inaugural Alternative Spring Break program. This month, more than 300 18-to-24-year-olds — more than 40% of them repeat volunteers — will head to Louisiana for more post-hurricane relief work.

Baltimore resident Brian Pham, 21, saw one of United Way’s ads on MTV last spring and ended up in Biloxi, roofing and framing homes for hurricane victims still stuck in trailers supplied by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

In June, he went on a vacation to New York, where he donated time at a day-care center, a home for the elderly and a women’s shelter. Now, he’s in Louisiana for a month as one of United Way’s project managers.

“I don’t even know what words to describe it. Fulfillment, I guess,” said Pham, who took time off from his family’s real estate company to volunteer. “You just feel like you’re doing so much to save the world.”

And it’s not just young idealists helping out. Richard Degnan, a senior executive for Williams-Sonoma Inc., took a four-week jaunt to Africa last year. On his trip, the 40-year-old San Francisco resident visited four countries and took two high-priced safaris. He also spent two days at three orphanages, where he played with children and dropped off suitcases full of clothes. It just didn’t seem right, he said, to go to Africa and not do any volunteer work.

“I know this is going to sound a bit silly, but to be honest, I think it’s because of people like Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie,” said Degnan, referring to the celebrity couple’s globe-hopping visits to orphanages and refugee camps. “They’ve glamorized it.”

The orphanages were not what he expected. They were clean and the kids seemed happy and well cared for. But the children were still needy.

“They all craved physical attention — especially little kids want to be held, picked up,” Degnan said. “There’s just not enough people to give them enough attention.

“Now that I’ve done this once, wherever I go, I will always do this.”

Melissa Thornley, 35, spent last Christmas break in Honduras, building homes for the poor. She caught a truck every day at 7 a.m. that took her into the mountains, where she worked four or five hours.

“I was doing physical work, but in a way, it was relaxing,” said Thornley, managing director for a film editing company in Chicago that produces commercials. “When you’re in advertising, we’re not really contributing very much…. I wanted it to feel like I was doing something good over the holidays.”

She booked her trip through i-to-i.com, a British company that allows tourists to book specific volunteer travel. Among the choices: panda conservation in China, coaching baseball in the Dominican Republic and saving sea turtles in Costa Rica.

Although i-to-i.com has been around since 1994, North American bookings increased more than 300% from 2002 to 2005. Last year, the company arranged 5,000 volunteer vacations worldwide, spokeswoman Amy Kaplan said.

“Vacation travel is all about recharging our batteries,” said Randy Wagner, chief marketing officer for Orbitz Worldwide, which owns CheapTickets. “The traditional way is to go to the beach, recharge and you feel great. Now people are telling us that they feel just as great when they give back.”
http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-fi-voluntourism7mar07,1,7765787.story?track=rss&ctrack=1&cset=true

Thanks for the fincher article, great read :D and we can add Jake G, to the lists of actors who complain about Fincher.

327
the real tita Says:
+++++++++
LMAO Damn you Andrew Morton for not writing that bio of Tom.

You got punked @ 03/07/2007 at 3:36 pm

327
the real tita Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 3:32 pm - flag comment
#247: bluemoon, have you ever seen a picture of Tom’s cousin, William Mapother? If you can find a picture of him, compare it to Suri’s (esp. the latest video on the celeb shows). I think the guy’s on that series Lost. Believe it or not, the resemblance is so uncanny (the eyes are a dead giveaway) that if he said he was the father, he could get away with it better than Birkhead could with Dannielynn.
—————————————
When I saw the recent pics of Suri I thought the same thing. She has the same nose and eyes.

dragonfly @ 03/07/2007 at 3:38 pm

289
20/20 Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 2:58 pm - flag comment
US Magazine put that in there to show how she’s greasing the palms of these officials to get preferential treatment and hopscotch over the ordinary peons (your bretheren) who may be waiting to adopt as well.

**************************************

Oh yeah, because, sure…if US Magazine says she has pledged 2 million it MUST be true. ::rollseyes::

Get a clue. How would US know that info about the money? It’s most likely made up and fabricated by US Mag, you YOU buy it and are already spouting it like gospel. I shoulda known.

[Fug Face Maniston] @ 03/07/2007 at 3:39 pm

[x] [x] [x] [x] She gets mentioned so much I’m starting to like her. [Eww]
Her lame swagger is really Hurting-Feelings.

Mr. and Mrs. Smith @ 03/07/2007 at 3:40 pm

330
Rachel Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 3:34 pm - flag comment
________________________________________________________________

Keep on dreaming honey, okay? Maybe you’ll have sweet dreams.

mr and mrs smith says thanks for the article.today show were talking about more and more people doing charity vacation.thank God for brad and angie for paving the way

yes susie, welcome to the club….

#330 Rachel Says:

++++++++++++++

weren’t you just bitten by a dog? dog must have been rabid

333
bluemoon Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 3:36 pm - flag comment
Thanks for the fincher article, great read and we can add Jake G, to the lists of actors who complain about Fincher.

I read that too.. Jake did not like shooting take after take… But it does come off as a bit whiney…
It’s cool that Brad and Fincher have such a great bond, Sounds like they have enormous respect for each other …
He is a great director..Loved all of his movies so far.

330
Rachel Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 3:34 pm - flag comment
-
This pathetic old hag is back and the only contribution she can make is the article she read from a banana leaf. haha!

342
justsoyouknow Says:

thanks for the reminder of the depth of compassion and class that Jen fan’s have..

Ladies, I don’t think we should keep engaging people who call a kid ‘dumb’ in our conversation (#132), this people are not worth anyone’s time and energy.

I was going to write #342 as in justsoyouknow.

JoliePitt @ 03/07/2007 at 3:50 pm

hey! the trolls are still here?

Thank you Just Jared for these wonderful news. Anyway, ignore the haters and suppot Brad and Angie on their quest to make a difference in this world. Thank God for people like them. I admire them. The word is “admire” not obssesed or worship, we know the difference. Ignore the haters okay.

JoliePitt @ 03/07/2007 at 3:54 pm

RACHEL and ANON, you losers are still here? I thought you have lives and I don’t! I was away from my PC for 3 hours to attend a meeting for work! Now, I am back 3 hours later, you’re both still here???? Darn! You’re both are in love with Brad and Angie and not to mention you consider Brangelina as your idols, JUST ADMIT IT!!!!!!!!!!!

Prez,

Thanks for posting that great article about David Fincher. I have read where Jake G and Robert D had dissed him, but Mark Ruffalo had praised him. Thank goodness he had the courage to say that actors get paid a lot of money, and so he has no patience with their hangovers and other BS. And I love it where he praised Brad. Brad is loved by most directors … even Darren Aronofsky, who was to have directed him in The Fountainhead, had high praise for him even after he bowed out of that movie.

342
justsoyouknow Says:
March 7th, 2007 at 3:42 pm - flag comment

The only thing you can do is agree to pathetic old hag, Rachel “Green”. You have no substance at all.

of course jen has moved on she’s the biggest and most beautiful star in hollywood. she doesn’t need brad or vince or anyone. everyone loves her..
Are you trying to convince yourself? Opps, you forgot to tell us she has the best hair, nose, chin, boobs in HW.

Tate Donovan, Brad Pitt and and Vince Vaughn all left Aniston. That’s hard to swallow, isn’t it?

bye bamzs fans

Good for them. I admire them a lot because they use their celebrity for good. Let the Jolie-Pitts be happy and enjoy their lives. They make a good change from the train wrecks in HW.

For all those who like to laugh and enjoy a humorous slant to news; check out Defamers take on the adoption and Chin’s reaction

http://defamer.com/hollywood/brad-pitt/pitt-and-jolie-will-soon-receive-fedex-tracking-number-for-new-vietnamese-baby-also-hows-jen-holding-up-242326.php

susie
Did you read the answers in the Tomkat topic? those are freaking funny. This one is my favorite
By “lower profile,” do you mean he won’t be wearing his lifts? Either way it’s good they put out the warning that he will be underfoot. A starlet could trip over him and break something.

That Defamer article is not exactly very flattering for Brad and Angelina either.

301lmao Says:
****
LMAO!

piper, with a low @ 03/07/2007 at 4:41 pm

350
julia Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 3:57 pm - flag comment
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Actually, that smile seems more on the annoyed side. It’s almost as if he’s grinding his teeth after spotting the paps.

bluemoon- I just went and read it. Very funny. I love their site for some laughs.

355
Defamer Says:
today I am ready for the on-slaught of accusations. I made it clear that reading the article was for people with a sense of humor.

What are we in the 1950’s? It is sick how all you women condone BP dumping JA (if that is even the case, you all use that as an excuse that BP left) becuase she was not ready to have a baby. If that is even true?? Which I highly doubt .. Whats wrong with a womens right to have things in life before she has a kid? If any of are mothers you know that once that happens things change forever. I waited 9 years with my husband (we established our own business and for me to in upper management prior to starting a family, nothing wrong with timelines) None of you actually know if they had a time line. Barefoot and pregnant, have we not come further then that in 2007? And for all of you to say that she has not moved on … well you wont let her. Everyone are alwys talking about her and what she is doing or not doing, for people that are not fans of someone (JA) you sure do know a lot about someone you dont like?

Please provide the words from BP;s mouth that he left because she would not have a kid?? Is that fact available???

Anon you must have gotten lost. This sight is for those who love Brand And Angie and the kids. I think Jennifer A has a sight you might want to visit.

hi guys,
i just saw some vid (lamiga collections) at brangelinaespanol.blog, and one of them
had a vid of BAMZS and it tooks by people in the car, i heard the voices of Maddox,
Brad and Angie, it’s about 18 seconds

359
captd Says

Is it? Where does it say that?? It is a public blog ..

what is the www adress

first and last post @ 03/07/2007 at 4:52 pm

Re: #47 Rachel Says:
A.“my neighbor adopted 11 kids through out her life.. from all ages
B. and i dont see this huge following..
C. BRANGELINA does it PARTLY for the publicity..
D. after all they DID have an affair…”
Your neighbor should be commended. But how do you legitimately go from sentence A to sentence B? This reflects illogical reasoning on your part and you will probably get all excited that I “called you a hater”…I’m not calling you a hater, but I am questioning the premise for your post…what you are not grasping is that the JP’s are in a position of influence regarding adoption, international concerns and they are able to reach a far greater population. They have the media’s attention which your neighbor does not.
C. Absolutely yes, Brangelina does it for publicity such that even close colleagues such as Matt Damon and George Clooney have stated in interviews the JP’s bring attention to issues that get muddled in the general news…there is certainly nothing wrong with that. Most “celebrities” know the power of the media so why not bring attention to personal issues that are important to them. I don’t understand why anyone would have a problem with that.
D. Your statement they had an affair is certainly presumptuous, definitely unfounded. This issue has been addressed so many times on many other threads that you obviously are a “hit and run poster” who doesn’t bother to read because you are too self absorbed with flinging unproven baiting irrational statements. If you are so convinced, prove it with direct interviews from the parties involved, Aniston’s statement verified with a link, date, article etc addressing that as a fact will do…until then your post is not credible and every post you write will not be taken seriously. Ahhh, but the whole point of your post is you don’t want to or feel you have to prove your statement. You and Anon should post at FF or dlist, they are more your speed, posters don’t research or substantiate and no one seems to care about facts. You’ll like it there.

360
hanna Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 4:49 pm - flag comment
hi guys,
i just saw some vid (lamiga collections) at brangelinaespanol.blog, and one of them
had a vid of BAMZS and it tooks by people in the car, i heard the voices of Maddox,
Brad and Angie, it’s about 18 seconds

———————————————————-
Is it a new video?Give us the link.

it is 2007.

360
hanna Says
+++++++
Link please

i found it..

Move on … cant tell by this blog.

JoliePitt @ 03/07/2007 at 4:59 pm

359
Admit it Says:

March 7th, 2007 at 4:47 pm - flag comment
====================================
Brad and jen, they are in their late 30’s, going to early 40’s AND they already have the millions to be considered financialLY stabbled to start a family. NO EXCUSE!!!

As for you and me, we are normal people and we have to work hard to make the thousands and it takes a lot of our energy and time, SO STARTING A FAMILY LATE, I believe is the norm. I am too a business owner and in my early 30’s and ready to start a family, but I won’t let money$ be the factor, instead what’s holding me is a man I considered kind-hearted, humorous and down to earth! As for Jen IF she loves Brad and knowing the fact that they already have the finance, good age and love each other, THEN WHAT IS THE HOLD UP? The only few things I can think of is that JEN is too busy with her film career right after married Brad and continue to say baby is on the way, when in fact babies were never on the way and is still not on the way AND this is even after Brad has 3 kids in two years. REALLY JEN HAD NO INTENTIONS OF HAVING KIDS when she was with Brad and if she did plan to have kids, but because of her poor choices IT IS TOO LATE as Brad! Why it is too late!!! Simply because Jen choose career over family!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hi Meli,
I don’t know is it new or old vid, but I think before Angie went to Darfur,
this site is Brangelinaespanol.blogs, sorry i can not links, b/c i dont know how to do that, yes susie tought me how to links, but i find this blog if i first lurked brangelinafans.blog then you can see the links on the right side,

oops my mistake, I forgot to post the link.
***********

JPs walking

hanna- I got to that site, but what do I go under to see the video with Mad’s voice?

hi susie,

click on the right side and you can see : brangelinaalbum, of vid of Brangelina,
alot of vid collection of lamiga, oh by the way i think lamiga is jj fans too, so if you lamiga read this, you are a Bamsz trully fans..

Awwwwwwwwww, they speak. I wish I would see them walking down the street.
thanks hanna,
thanks angelah

here’s a link to the site:

http://brangelinaenespanol.blogspot.com/2006_03_01_brangelinaenespanol_archive.html

Thanks hanna and angelah.I think it’s from 3/16,when this picture was taken.

http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h203/gomapyr/IMG_0812.jpg

368
JoliePitt Says:
Please provide the interview where BP dumped her b/c she wouldnt have kids please??

As you are not an actress you do not understand that working is very small window, please dont pretend you actually know what the reason why they didnt have kids were.

That no excuse statement is just selfish of you to say, you are not a close personal friend or family member, you have no idea what the excuse/reason was? The Excuse here is that BP was having an affair. You all use JP as the excuse, I am ashamed for all you women that condone it and then kid a women while she is down. She is human. She has to endure eveything for everyone to watch and everyone of you kick her while she is down. You guys lose your minds when someone says something negative about people you dont even know, you could never handle what she has been thru.

So I ask you, where is the fact of him leaving b/c of no kids???

Angelah,

Thanks for the link. It is such a cute video, I imagine it would sound like me if I actually had the chance to video them. Thank goodness no other papz were taping them …