OlderFri, 09 March 2007 at 4:00 am
Aniston Not Dating ‘Dirt’ Cameraman
Just to clear up a rumor you may have heard the last few weeks…
Is Jennifer Aniston dating Dirt cameraman Mike?
Says my source on the set of Courteney Cox’s salacious new show: “No, all untrue.” Apparently Dirt only has two cameramen on the show and neither are named Mike. Go figure!
Pictured is Jennifer Aniston, 38, arriving at a midtown hotel on Thursday night in New York City.
(Images via Getty)
Share This Post:
418 Comments
Could someone tell her she’s not 19 anymore? The long parted-in-the-middle hair looks stupid.
Just Jared has become the Aniston Bully Club. All these gay and lesbian pals and fat old women go to this website and say spiteful things about Jen and pretend Jolie is Mother Theresa. It is a silly sad game of self deception.
This website has become the Aniston Bully club : filled with comments from fat women with lower incomes and gay people. All who read the tabloids paper like it was an education. All who struggles desperately to pretend Jolie is some form of Saint. It’s a “shallow” deception.
Could someone tell her she’s not 19 anymore? The long parted-in-the-middle hair looks stupid.
__________________
Not does it look stupid, but it makes her horsey face look even more elongated!!! It makes her look even more of a horsey face1!! NOT A GOOD LOOK BRO!!!!
This website has become the Aniston Bully club : filled with comments from fat women with lower incomes and gay people. All who read the tabloids paper like it was an education. All who struggles desperately to pretend Jolie is some form of Saint. It’s a “shallow” deception.
I hOPE no one here has used racist, evil comments that the FANaustons have used in their posts and others I have seen!!!! These FANanustons are evil, vile,creations who represent their IDOL!!!!!
351
zzzzzzzzz Says:
March 10th, 2007 at 6:57 am - flag comment
—–
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ to you too.
How presumptious of you to say I am fat and have a low income and gay? You don’t know what you’re talking about. You can’t defend X because everything we say here are true, so you the only thing you can do is attack us. Do you really want to compare income and lifestyle? Let’s just say I can afford to lurk here every minute if I want to.
Nobody here said Angie is a saint. I just admire her work and her dedication to her family.
You again honey, presumes a lot.
People. Please. Some semblance of reality. This woman is not ‘beautiful.’ She isn’t ‘pretty’ either. I don’t mean to be mean. I’m just all about truth telling, and REALITY. If she’s beautiful, then so are Sarah Jessica Parker and Bette Midler. Don’t get me wrong, I love all these ladies. But let’s be real. Jennifer Aniston wears nice outfits, has a nice figure and a great haircut. End. of. story.
See chart below, just to give you some kind of measuring stick based in reality:
Beautiful = Monica Belluci, Angelina Jolie, Halle Berry, Charlize Theron, Natalie Portman, Jessica Alba, Ashley Judd, and Salma Hayek, to name a few.
Pretty = Nicole Kidman, Drew Barrymore, Naomi Watts, Kate Winslet, Scarlett Johannsen, Penelope Cruz, Katie Holmes, Beyonce, to name a few.
Now, you can argue about who among these two categories belongs in the ‘beautiful,’ as opposed to ‘pretty’ category…and vice versa. But it’s hard, almost impossible to say that they are not one or the other.
Jennifer Aniston. It is not hard at all. Because, I repeat - she is NOT, ‘pretty’ or ‘beautiful.’
BUT YOU FORGOT SHE HAS NOT TALENT…..
351
zzzzzzzzz Says:
March 10th, 2007 at 6:57 am - flag comment
This website has become the Aniston Bully club : filled with comments from fat women with lower incomes and gay people. All who read the tabloids paper like it was an education. All who struggles desperately to pretend Jolie is some form of Saint. It’s a “shallow” deception.
=====================
Go back to FF’s Brangelina Bully club
As for fat with lower incomes, it seems like you’re projecting your own faults on us. that’s why you love Jen so much, she’s more your speed.
The problem with botox…when it freezes the forehead, it can make the forehead “hang” lower and thus make the person’s eyes look smaller and beadier as well. That’s why some women have brow lifts too–which will probably be next on X’s agenda because this botox is giving her sort of a Cro-Magnon look.
They can adopt 20 more kids and she wouldn’t care,” says the source
RIGHT, she doesn’t care about the “adopted kids”. As she told Larry King, adoption is not her thing. If Brad and Angelina were to have another biological child, she would definitely care. Brad’s bio kids are all she cares about.
I liked her old nose better….much better. Granted she had some problems with it, but I thought it was cute. I really don’t know why should would change it, she probably could have fixed whatever breathing problem etc she had without compromising the structure of it…
358
mai suy Says:
March 10th, 2007 at 7:31 am - flag comment
People. Please. Some semblance of reality. This woman is not ‘beautiful.’ She isn’t ‘pretty’ either. I don’t mean to be mean. I’m just all about truth telling, and REALITY. If she’s beautiful, then so are Sarah Jessica Parker and Bette Midler. Don’t get me wrong, I love all these ladies. But let’s be real. Jennifer Aniston wears nice outfits, has a nice figure and a great haircut. End. of. story.
See chart below, just to give you some kind of measuring stick based in reality:
Beautiful = Monica Belluci, Angelina Jolie, Halle Berry, Charlize Theron, Natalie Portman, Jessica Alba, Ashley Judd, and Salma Hayek, to name a few.
Pretty = Nicole Kidman, Drew Barrymore, Naomi Watts, Kate Winslet, Scarlett Johannsen, Penelope Cruz, Katie Holmes, Beyonce, to name a few.
Now, you can argue about who among these two categories belongs in the ‘beautiful,’ as opposed to ‘pretty’ category…and vice versa. But it’s hard, almost impossible to say that they are not one or the other.
Jennifer Aniston. It is not hard at all. Because, I repeat - she is NOT, ‘pretty’ or ‘beautiful.’
BUT YOU FORGOT SHE HAS NOT TALENT…..
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Well said. I would definately agree that there are some women who fall into the beautiful category, then ones that would be referred to as pretty. I suppose Jennifer A. would fall into the “attractive/cute” category. She did play a very cute Rachel Green, but I don’t think many would describe her as beautiful.
I don’t understand why she doesn’t get involved with producing a movie on her own. With all of her money and contacts in the industry, I would think that there would be at least one story she would fell compassionate about and want to bring it to the big screen. The fact that she hasn’t worked in over a year makes me wonder if she is just content living with her millions, which is cool for her, but she comes across as looking rather shallow, IMO. Do something Jen !!
don’t understand why she doesn’t get involved with producing a movie on her own.
_________________________
she prefers to use other people’s money. She just hordes hers. You would think she would help her poor mother some at least.
Is it possible to get Botox injections between the nose and the upper lip? That’s where her face looks frozen.
Just in case you are reading this board Jen, you really need to apologize for that nasty hatchet job you let Leslie do for you in the Vanity Fair magazine. I did not renew my subscription because you lowered the magazine’s standards and now all they want are dumped women who will trash the ex-husband. Not your finest moment and certainly not the magazines.
Other moments that have been particularly low on the character scale are the lying about VV, the nose job, the desire to have kids, the debacle over the firing of RHI director because of you, etc. You have squandered your credibility. Now that I think about it, maybe it is too late. Sorry.
Perhaps you should pursue another career and give us all a break for awhile.
# 366. Very well put!
I never really paid attention to JA before this scandel but listening to all you unfeeling bit**es, i can’t help but empathize and champion her. She should have been a total bit*h and raked his lying, cheating, back-stabbing a** over the coals. She was way to nice, i would have chewed him a new one. All this backlash he and his “partner” get is well deserved. I mean what kind of woman wouldn’t defend another when being so utterly humiliated in public ? I’m guessing, like a previous poster mentioned ,you girls are a bunch of lesbians, and insensitive ones at that.
Way to go Sue!
368
sue Says:
March 10th, 2007 at 5:02 pm - flag comment
Well said
368
sue Says:
—————-
I am a design engineer and a mother of 3. I dislike people who lie . To lump every posters here as lebsbians makes you the insensitive one.
Just because you cannot convince posters here who are rational, sensible and think with their logical brain to understand you does not make us all a bunch of insensitive one.
You need to reaccess why people do not agree with you. Simple reason - you are wrong and the facts stated clearly indicate Ms Aniston to be one of a the many things that has been written. These are not some rumors, abstract fiction or story plucked from the air. The things written about her are events happening in her current life, interviews she gave and stated in her own words that show how she contradict herself, lie and manipulated people and the public .
LMAO, only an idiot jen hen will think calling people lesbians is an insult.
372 posts and counting..Go Jen!
70
sue Says:
March 10th, 2007 at 5:26 pm - flag comment
368
sue Says:
March 10th, 2007 at 5:02 pm - flag comment
Well said
***************
You are not even bright enough to change the name before your agree with yourself!
Gds D LOL what kind of games are you playing? I’m guessing it was you. (_?_)!
I’m just imagining what type of person would come to a JA thread and rag on a woman that’s been shi* and dumped on. This is foul.You people are just FLAWED
Pages: « 1 … 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!