Top Stories

Pax Thien Jolie’s Adoption Papers

Pax Thien Jolie’s Adoption Papers

Here are the adoptions papers that Angelina Jolie filed with authorities in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam in order to gain custody of 3-year-old son Pax Thien Jolie. The adoption agency Angelina used also issued this statement following the adoption of Pax.

Bui Thi Bich Tuyen, a nurse from Tam Binh Orphanage where Angelina adopted Pax said staff there didn’t realize she and Brad Pitt were celebrities when they first visited last year during ThanksgivingAngelina shared crayons and drew pictures with the kids.

Said Tuyen, “They looked very much like ordinary people. We thought that they were just an ordinary couple that wanted to play with the kids and give them presents. They brought lots of toys. We could already see that she had a heart for children.”

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Alicia Silverstone sounds off on Brittany Murphy's death - PopEater
  • Kate Hudson heads to a holiday party - PopSugar
  • Britney Spears heads to NYC - LaineyGossip
  • Authorities don't suspect foul play in Brittany's death - Dlisted
  • Demi Lovato attends a famous wedding - JustJaredJr
  • Tiger Woods' advice comes back to him - TheSuperficial
  • Watch the Taylor Squared V-Day kiss - Celebuzz
Dimitri Halkidis/WENN

431 Comments

Pages: « 112 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 » Show All

341Besane Says:

You know, at this point it’s really moot for Huvane to attempt to salvage the reputation of the X. The deed and lies are all done. Everybody intelligent and open minded knows that. The only ones to continue to support this very old story are the people in denial that can’t accept that the story is over. So for those that are still wearing their 3D glasses - HELLO! Follow the light. The EXIT light. The LIGHT! Out of the tunnellll!!

342gypsy Says:

That IS your opinion. The BAMPZS fans have the same opinion as the J-P’s. There are people who aside from being intelligent are also DOERS, who follow their dreams and ALSO have the talent and skill AND who are capable to multi-task without a problem. These are people who are strong enough to get out of their comfort zone, and face risks. And generally according to studies and statistics are also the happiest. Top it if you have the financial means to support the goal you have in mind and your chances of success more than doubles. ONLY people who are AFRAID puts negativity in front of any opportunities or goals therefore they stay in the dark and only criticizes others who are doing what deep inside they wish they have the confidence and strength to do. So gripe all you want, it’s not going to change our support for the JP’s.

Ok, so if i make any negative comment about the Jolie/Pitts i am automatically an Aniston fan. Please, i don’t care one way or the other about her and only care about Jolie/Pitt in as much as i think their adoption practices are crazy.

I am sure Pax will not mind having younger siblings but the truth of the matter is that young children who have been institutionalised mayhave issues that are not apparent until much later. It is usually recommended that they be at least 2 years younger than the other children in the house for the other children’s safety. Read any adoption web site and this will be stated.

To the posters who mentioned that Jolie and Pitt have stated that they want to adopt their children quickly…..Are you really telling me that just because they WANT to build there family quickly, that their WANTS should take precedence ove these children’s NEEDS. Please…if Brad has left it too lated that’s his problem.

377
gypsy Says:
March 17th, 2007 at 11:09 am - flag comment
———————
Look, why do you think these to very intellegent people have not consulted professionals? I have friends that have built families quickly be it adoption or marrying and having blended families. There have been bumps in the road, but as long as there are loving parents it works it’s way out. I’m a product of a blended family. Every one of us is accomplished and very happy! So what is your issue!?

The Fraud is moving to New York? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Sorry, I guess I better go to scream to the ocean …..Oh, I mean, Hudson River!! :-)
The whinner better stays Hollyweird. Hay, HUVANE, if you sneak around JustJared, listen to me: leave her there rotten there, don’t send her over to polute my beloved city!

Ha…

BCBG! Morning and HAPPY SAINT PATRICKS DAY TO YOU!!!!

Come on people give it up already, who the **** cares about huvane and aniston. They are in the past, leave them there. I swear some of you people are more obsess with huvane and aniston than with the Jolie-Pitts

Gypsy
Just because your paents had many kids and neglected you does not mean all parents are like that.

Sorry, a typo. “pollute”.

381
OMFG Says:
March 17th, 2007 at 11:16 am - flag comment
————————-
I’m with you! People just need to keep her relevant!

381
OMFG

No kidding! I truly dislike the backstabber. In the old Gyspy way (waving to Gyspy), she’d be sunk in the Hudson River!

Brad doesn’t mind being whoooped by Angelina. It is because he is crazy about her. Plain to see. “He is all man, he doesn’t have to prove anything to anybody”. I’m sure all men would just die to be in his shoes. :-)

Proof in the Pudding @ 03/17/2007 at 11:32 am

From Lainey

Jennifer Aniston begs for attention

Meanwhile, back in Frigid Fraud Aniston Land, things are decidely less cheerful. Camp Jen apparently relied too heavily on the post-separation p0pularity polls, when every bored housewife in America and that old delusional ****, Liz Smith, bought stock in the new no-Brad, no-Friends Jen. America’s Sweetheart will bounce back. The beloved Jennifer Aniston will enjoy a long career, even without her famous ex. Hmmm. How interesting. Six months later and it’s full scale panic. Mr & Mrs Smith is killing at the box office, Brad & Angie continue to do big business on newsstands while Aniston-related reports inspire little more than passing interest. Isn’t it bloody obvious by now that Jennifer Aniston became who she is/was by virtue ONLY of her marriage to the sexiest man alive??? So…desperate to save a campaign based primarily on post-divorce pity, Jen’s people are now scraping at the bottom of the barrel. My source says they’ve been bargaining their asses off, ‘They’re throwing Janice Min these stupid little tips, begging to put Jen in the magazine, in return for juicy stuff later on when she starts promotion for Rumour Has It. She never had to do this when she was with Brad. That was when she had it easy. Nowadays? No one cares!’ I guess this explains why every item on Jennifer Aniston these days has to do with how wonderful she’s doing and how great she looks and how she’s moved on and blah blah blah blah blah. But when you hear the same message over and over again, doesn’t it begin to stink of ‘rapidly aging has-been frantically trying to avoid obscurity??’ Yeah. I thought so. Anyway, let’s not waste any more time on leftover happy anorexics. I believe we have some fantasy sex to attend to. And when we left off, things were just getting started in the rub-a-dub.

good day to all bampzs fans,happy st pats day.

If BRAD wants to build his family quickly that his problem,he will deal with problems the why he wants.I am sure they have thought of everything.DR Jane Aronson has talked to them and will help them all the way because that were they are going to take Pax the moment he step foot in USA.

there is a new thread

I truly hope, for all of these adorable children’s sake, that you guys are right and the J P’s have everything under control. I just don’t believe that any reputable adoption specialist would encourage adoptions at the rate and order that these adoptions are taking place. However, the things i have stated on this forum are common knowledge among adopting parents, and J&P will not be able to claim ignorance of this stuff in the future if anything does go wrong. Hopefully it will never come to that, but at the rate that these two are adopting it seems inevitable to me. Having never heard either of them conduct an intelligent conversation in any of their interviews, i do not have the faith in their judgement as you guys seem to have.
Sorry, but thats how i see it

I don’t know if you’ve read this. Not a flattering pic of Brad. He looks very tired.

http://img480.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ls030507pitdj7.jpg
http://img266.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ls030507pitavt7.jpg
http://img266.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ls030507pitbtc0.jpg

He must be looking forward to Angie and the boys being back home, and to meeting the new member of the family.

338
bermy girl Says:

March 17th, 2007 at 10:05 am - flag comment
If Huvane is NOT orchestrating the negative press, then he and his client are up the creek - by doing the Vanity Fair article and other articles/antics a while back they created a monster and now the press and other dummies in the public can’t view his client as anything other than a woman scorned. Pity might have seemed attractive at the time, but 2 years later it’s a turn-off to would-be suitors and employers.

If he and his client ARE orchestrating the negative press then they are truly clueless. It hasn’t enhanced his client’s career. Didn’t people insist on a new ending for the Breakup because they didn’t want to see her dumped again (in a movie)? Talk about limiting your career options! Also, what man wants to be involved with someone who is obsessed with smearing her ex and his new family? VV didn’t last too long. And the smear job will have done nothing to slow down the careers of B and A, or the happiness and growth of their family.

————————————-

Excellent post bermy! I agree - I’ve sometimes wondered of late, if Huvane wasn’t deliberately trying to deep-six her career. Truly, it makes no sense. This is a case of Maniston cutting off her nose to spite her face - or to sue another cliche, she was unable to see the forest for the trees. The trees being an immediate gratification in sharing rags and mags with the ‘new’ super hot coupling of ‘Brangelina.’ Maniston’s ego is such, that she only saw the immediate payback of sharing magazine and ragazine covers and having her name attached to theirs - starting a tabloid ‘war.’ I’m sure at the time, and even in the several months that followed she may not have been able to see the way in which she was taking a sledgehammer to her own career. Like you say, she is the eternal victim and woman scorned - everywhere BUT Hollywood, as they know her for the lying media manipulator she and her PR guru Huvane are, and bottomline THAT is the only place that counts in the end. Brad Pitt isn’t her tormentor, or the person that ‘did this to her,’ in HW - he is the same upstanding honest good hearted man he always was. THAT is what the reality is, and that is why she’s made more enemies than she even knows.

As I said a long time ago — if she had wanted to repair some of the damage she’s done, she would do her best, in small subtle positive ways to make it seem as if there is no grudge and no ill-will (NOT by saying there is no ill-will and bad feelings), but by actually saying happy positive things, and deigning to use Brad’s name (and even -gasp!- Angelina’s), and wishing their family the best.

What she calls ‘moving on,’ is actually the opposite - because her statements are negative, and have to do with the ‘triangle’ she and her publicist created — essentially, what she’s doing then, is equivalent to saying to the public, “Please, I’ve moved on - and I forgive Brad for beating me.” These kinds of statements only fire up her hater fan base, and confirm that she had reason to be upset to begin with. Consequently the haters think to themselves, “Jen is even more wonderful than we knew, she can forgive that lying cheat for doing this to her.” It’s a passive aggressive tactic. It’s negative, couched in a positive. It really is abhorrent, and makes me loathe her almost as much as if she hadn’t said ANYTHING.

She’s a liar. She’s disingenuous. That’s the truth. I mean after all, it would only be natural for someone CLAIMING she’ll love a person “for the rest of (her) life,” to wish him well publicly, KNOWING how a fraction of said public (her fans) may perceive him and his new family. But she never has - and of course, that statement was yet another passive aggressive Vanity Fair moment - designed to give her her cake, so she could eat it too. She didn’t really mean it. She does not love or care about Brad Pitt.

Kylie Minogue was in a similar situation as Maniston, with her ex-boyfriend Olivier Martinez. The tabloid media, particularly the UK and Aussie tabloid media (some of the worst rags in existence) were all ready to make Kylie the new singing dancing ‘Pop’ Jennifer Aniston. Tabloid after tabloid screamed that Olivier had been cheating and that is why they broke up. Kylie is very much loved, especially after conquering cancer as she’s done - so they went after Olivier with guns blasting - even attaching Angie to him, dragging up things and maligning his character ala what Maniston did to Brad. The truth of the matter is, this man not only helped her through her illness - she lived with him in his home and he took care of her - to which she was forever grateful. This was a case where because she DID LOVE THIS MAN, she write a column telling the rags to STOP IT, and describing Olivier - the kind of man he was, in glowing wonderful terms. The fact that he was no longer with her, and may have been with someone else, was not enough for her to trash him for all time.

That’s LOVE.

Maniston sh*t all over Brad, and betrayed him as bad as Paltry in my opinion - and she still hasn’t made amends. the day she does, I’ll be the first one dropping MY grudge against her.

I won’t hold my breath, as she’s as dumb as she is fug.

I really hope, for these four adorable children’s sake, that the J/P’s are on top of everything. I just don’t really believe that any reputable adoption specialist would recommend the rate and order of their adoptions. If they do run into trouble down the line, and at this rate it is only a matter of time, they can’t plead ignorance because the potential problems should be common knowledge to them if they have done any homework. I am sorry, but i just don’t have the same faith in their intelligence as you guys have, having never heard them utter anything remotely intelligent in any of their interviews.

First of all… i just start posting in this forum 2-3 weeks ago and I NEVER posted anything negative about Brad and Angie!! “Dulce” is a common name, so that Dulce it was NOT me!!

I mean, if i posted something negative about brad and angie; why i will use the same user name again??, haters keep changing user names because they are cowards!! So it was NOT me!!

It really makes me so SICK that someone say that i’m a Jennifer Aniston fan; because i don’t like her and i don’t think she is a good person at all!! She is a passive aggressive person who blames everybody for her problems except her and she is a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!! And belive me… Maniston is ALL that and MUCH WORSE!! I’m studying Psychology and i know the signs and Maniston is NOT a good person and she is really FAKE!!

And freidaflo… i don’t need your pity!! I mean, the only reason i wanted to know about the NATIONAL ENQUIRER article was because everyone here keeps saying that it’s a lie. So i just wanted to know of what they were talking about!! So freidaflo… STOP being so JUDGMENTAL!!!

Peasfully Disagree w/Piper @ 03/17/2007 at 12:22 pm

381
OMFG Says:

March 17th, 2007 at 11:16 am - flag comment
Come on people give it up already, who the **** cares about huvane and aniston. They are in the past, leave them there. I swear some of you people are more obsess with huvane and aniston than with the Jolie-Pitts

@@@@@@@%%%%%@@@@@

I agree. I’d love for the JP fans to be the bigger persons and not allow these wonderful threads celebrating the continued good fortune of BAMPZS to get so bogged down with the constant worry about who’s spying and why. It doesn’t matter to me about Huvane or Huvanne etc because as I see it, BAMPZS have won every war, every battle. Keeping the past alive when Brad & Angelina keep moving into the future not being concerned says to me that whatever anybody may or may not be trying to negatively orchestrate doesn’t factor in their lives. I follow Jolie & Pitts lead on it and wish others would too. IT;s such a waste of time and energy.

Peasfully Disagree w/Piper @ 03/17/2007 at 12:33 pm

gypsy Says:

March 17th, 2007 at 12:01 pm - flag comment
I truly hope, for all of these adorable children’s sake, that you guys are right and the J P’s have everything under control. I just don’t believe that any reputable adoption specialist would encourage adoptions at the rate and order that these adoptions are taking place. However, the things i have stated on this forum are common knowledge among adopting parents, and J&P will not be able to claim ignorance of this stuff in the future if anything does go wrong. Hopefully it will never come to that, but at the rate that these two are adopting it seems inevitable to me. Having never heard either of them conduct an intelligent conversation in any of their interviews, i do not have the faith in their judgement as you guys seem to have.
Sorry, but thats how i see it

@@@@@@@@@@@%%%%%

You really have it so polarized that if someone didnt think for themselves and do their own research than yeah, your negative predictions would probably be seen as the end of it. Sorry to disapoint, but I know more than a few people who have adopted back to back and for years with one family ending up with 8 kids added to their 3 natural born. Lifes good, lifes great, all the kids are thriving and loved. Why don’t you check out some of the REAL adoption family blogs and just read how wrong you are. They’re out there just waiting to educate you about what you are missenformed about. Im so amazed at your arrogance about how you think a reputable adoption pro would never encourage prospective parents. So arrogant and pompous of you and really sad because its clear that you want this family to NOT be in control so yo can say “I told you so.” Will not happen.

isitreallythatserious? @ 03/17/2007 at 12:42 pm

391
gypsy Says:
March 17th, 2007 at 12:01 pm - flag comment
——————–
Who die and made you an adoption expert? Right no one! Children are brought into families back to back and no one blinks an eye yet on this one so called experts are coming out of the woodwork to tell this family how to live. Look at Brit S who had kids back to back add Shar J. kids to the mix and all of those kids are under the age of four….the same should apply there right? but you don’t make a peep about that crap and let’s not forget Heidi K and Seal…or the Steven S. and Kate K. who have a tons of kids back to back to back at that yet you are not calling them out with your expert opinion….nope.

“Intelligent conversation” in interviews…lmao. Do you think that most of these interviews want to talk about their political views and such….no they want personal business/stupid question. Last time I check Angie rubs elbows with some of the greatest minds (political and others) in the world and left them feeling like they learned something and I’m sure she and Brad have contracted the corrected source to make sure that all of their children will have a smooth transition during this time.
Go get a kite and fly it in a rainstrom plz!

the bald truth @ 03/17/2007 at 12:52 pm

My God…Cliqua-insane is on the bloody boil again. I think if Ms Aniston walked down her street..Cliniqua the fat white boy would have a heart attack. Can’t understand why the loons are so obsessed with Ms Aniston…could be coz they’re subconciously terrified that they will one day have their partner tempted away by a ****..and after all they said about a marriage ain’t working if someone can just come in and steal your man…hahaha.

Are you really using Britney Spears as an example of responsible family building….OMG i think i rest my case…..you are a moron and not worth talking too

Pages: « 112 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.